1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to signaling system for railroads, and in particular to an electronic vital relay used to detect the presence of a train or a broken rail in particular track sections and/or track fault conditions between track sections.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Railroad systems, such as electrified railroad systems that employ power frequently track circuits, utilize signaling systems to provide signals for train operators and to control the operation of railroad crossing gates and warning lights. In such systems, each track circuit is bounded by insulated joints so that the presence of a train can be defined to a unique section of track. Railroad signaling systems use what is termed a vital relay or track relay to detect the presence of a train or a broken rail in particular track sections and/or track fault conditions between track sections (i.e., a fault in the insulated joint connecting two track sections). The signaling system only permits trains to pass and/or crossing gate and warning light systems to be in an off condition when the relay is in an operated condition. The relay will drop out of an operated condition if a train or a broken rail is in the particular track section being controlled or if there is otherwise a fault on the system which prevents an accurate detection of the presence of a train.
A typical use of a vital relay in a track circuit is shown in
The signaling system for this stretch of railroad is based on continuous train detection using a track circuit for each track section such as section T. Signaling energy for the track circuits is provided from a central source S having a frequency of, for example, 50, 60 Hz or 100 Hz, and is distributed along the stretch of railroad by the line wires 6 and 7. Energy is supplied across the rails of section T at the left or transmitting end through a track transformer 8 from the line wires 6 and 7. Even though AC energy is used, the supply connections are such that the instantaneous polarity of the rails on each side of the insulated joints 3 are opposite, as indicated by the polarity markings at the rails 1 and 2. The supply connections include a selected resistor 11 which limits the current flow when a train shunts the rails 1 and 2 at the transmitting end. At the other or receiving end of section T, a vital relay circuit 12 is connected across the rails 1 and 2 through a track transformer 13 and a control coil 14 (alternatively, they may be directly connected) and to the line wires 6 and 7 through a local coil 15. As discussed above, the vital relay circuit 12 detects the presence of a train or a broken rail and/or an insulated joint track fault condition in the section T, which detection is in turn used by the signaling system to provide signals for train operators.
As will be appreciated, if a train is not present and no rail is broken in the section T, a substantial amount of current will be present in the control coil 14. However, if a train is present in the section T, it will shunt the rails 1 and 2, thereby resulting in little or no current in the control coil 14. Similarly, there will be little or no current in the control coil 14 if a rail is broken in the section T. In addition, if the insulating joints 3 are intact, the current in the control coil 14 and the current in the local coil 15 will be substantially in phase. However, if a fault condition develops at the insulating joints 3, the current in the control coil 14 and the current in the local coil 15 will be out of phase. These principles are utilized by vital relays to detect the presence of trains and fault conditions in track sections.
A common type of vital relay in use in electrified railroad systems is what is known as a vane relay. A vane relay operates by a principle similar to that of a watt-hour meter. A vane relay includes a vane positioned in the magnetic gap between two coils (i.e., the control coil 14 and the local coil 15). The vane is responsive to the product of: (i) the current in the control coil, (ii) the current in the local coil, and (iii) the cosine of the angular difference of the current in the two coils. Maximum torque in a first direction is produced in the vane if current of a certain magnitude is present and the angular difference is zero (cosine of 0°=1), and maximum torque is produced in a second, opposite direction if current of a certain magnitude is present and the angular difference is 180° (cosine of 180°=−1). In addition, as the level of current decreases, the level of torque in either direction will decrease. The vane is fitted with a ladder structure so that a multiplicity of electrical contacts will close only when the vane rotates with sufficient torque in the first direction, which proves that the current in the two windings is nominally in phase and the current is of sufficient magnitude, i.e., there is not a train or a broken rail in the track section and there is no insulated joint fault condition. Just as important for railway train detection purposes, the contacts will not close if the phase relationship is reversed (indicates a fault at insulating joints 3), regardless of the magnitude of the product of current and angular difference, or if the current in one of the windings is not of sufficient magnitude (i.e., substantially zero) (indicates the presence of a train or broken rail).
The problem with vane relays is that, as an electromechanical device with moving parts, they require considerable preventive maintenance to assure reliable operation. In addition, because vane relays are a product based device, the control current required to close the contacts is inversely effected by the local voltage. If local voltage regulation is poor, safety or reliable operation can be impacted. For example, if the local voltage decreases, track current decreases proportionally, but the control current required to maintain the track relay energized is increased. In such a situation, the potential exists for the track relay to drop and falsely indicate that the track circuit is occupied. Alternatively, at increased local voltage, the rail current is greater, but the current that is required to maintain the track relay energized is decreased. This increases the risk of the track relay's failure to drop in the presence of a broken rail.
The present invention relates to a signaling method for a railroad system having a plurality of track sections that are connected to one another. Each of the track sections is bounded on either side by an insulated joint. Signaling energy is provided to the track sections by a source, and the source has line wires connected thereto. The method includes measuring a track current on a first one of the track sections at a first location thereon, wherein the signaling energy is provided to first one of the track sections at a second location thereon. The method further includes measuring a local voltage on the line wires, determining whether a magnitude of the track current meets or exceeds a threshold value independent of the local voltage, and determining whether the track current and the local voltage are nominally in phase with one another in a manner that is independent of the step of determining whether the magnitude of the track current meets or exceeds the threshold value. Finally, the method includes providing a first signal only if the magnitude is determined to meet or exceed the threshold value and the track current and the local voltage are determined to be nominally in phase with one another. The first signal is an indication-that a train is not present in the first one of the track sections, that the first one of the track sections does not have a broken rail, and that the particular insulated joints that bound the first one of the track sections do not include a fault condition. The first signal may cause a relay of the railroad system to be in an operated condition, or, alternatively, the first signal may be provided directly to a signaling system of the railroad system. In the preferred embodiment, the step of determining whether the track current and the local voltage are nominally in phase with one another includes synchronously rectifying the local voltage in response to the phase relationship between the local voltage and the track current.
The present invention also relates to a vital relay arrangement for a railroad system having a plurality of track sections connected to one another. Each of the track sections are bounded by insulated joints. Signaling energy is provided to the track sections by a source having line wires connected thereto. The vital relay arrangement includes a control transformer for generating a track voltage signal that is proportional to a track current on a first one of the track sections at a first location thereon, wherein the signaling energy is provided to the first one of the track sections at a second location thereon, and a local transformer for generating a local voltage signal that is proportional to a local voltage on the line wires. The vital relay arrangement also includes a means for converting the track voltage signal to a DC voltage, a means for determining whether the DC voltage meets or exceeds a voltage threshold value, and a means, independent of the means for determining whether the DC voltage meets or exceeds a voltage threshold value, for determining whether the track voltage signal and the local voltage signal are nominally in phase with one another. The vital relay arrangement provides a first signal only if the DC voltage is determined to meet or exceed the voltage threshold value and the track voltage signal and the local voltage signal are determined to be nominally in phase with one another. The first signal is an indication that a train is not present in the first one of the track sections, that the first one of the track sections does not have a broken rail, and that the particular insulated joints that bound the first one of the track sections do not include a fault condition. Preferably, the means for determining whether the track voltage signal and the local voltage signal are nominally in phase with one another uses synchronous rectification and therefore includes a synchronous rectifier. The synchronous rectifier may include a solid state relay coupled, for example, optically, to a synchronous switching element, wherein the solid state relay receives the track voltage signal and controls the switching of the synchronous switching element based thereon, and wherein the synchronous switching element receives the local voltage signal. The vital relay arrangement also preferably includes an averaging filter that receives the synchronous output voltage signal from the synchronous switching element and produces an averaged output voltage signal that is used to indicate whether the track voltage signal and the local voltage are nominally in phase with one another. The vital relay arrangement may include a relay, wherein the first signal causes the relay to be in an operated condition. Alternatively, the first signal may be provided directly to a signaling system of the railroad system.
These and other advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description and attached drawings, wherein:
As seen in
In addition, the AC voltage output of the control transformer 25 (which is proportional to the control/track current) is input into high speed solid state relay 60. The solid state relay 60 in turn optically transmits a control signal based on the received input voltage signal to synchronous switching element 65. As seen in
The output of synchronous switching element 65 is input into averaging filter 75. Averaging filter 75 produces a DC output signal that is an average of the AC voltage signal that is input thereto. It should be noted that the inductance value of the inductor forming a part of the averaging filter 75 is extremely high, e.g., on the order of 50-150 Henries. The use of averaging filter 75 is preferred to ensure that level detector 80, described below, responds only if the synchronous switching element 65 is operating properly. If a peak filter (simple capacitor) were used instead, a sequence of component failures could satisfy the level detector 80 regardless of phase differential between the control/track current and the local voltage. Of chief concern is a series of component failures, each of which is undetectable, followed by a shorted synchronous switching element 65, the consequence being continued operation regardless of phase reversal and therefore continued operation of the output in the event of a failed insulated joint.
The voltage signal output by the averaging filter 75 is input into level detector 80. As described above in connection with level detector 50, level detector 80 will output an oscillating signal, e.g., a square wave, only when the voltage output by averaging filter 75 meets or exceeds a predetermined threshold voltage value, and will output nothing if the voltage output by averaging filter 75 is less than the predetermined threshold voltage value (including negative values). The predetermined threshold voltage value is chosen to correspond to the voltage that would be output by averaging filter 75 in cases where the AC voltage that is proportional to the control/track current and the AC voltage that is proportional to the local voltage are nominally in phase, meaning they are in phase within a particular predetermined amount. For example, the AC voltage that is proportional to the control/track current and the AC voltage that is proportional to the local voltage may be considered to be nominally in phase when they are at least within 45° of one another. Such tolerance to phase shift is necessary because in operation, the control input will typically lag the local input due to the inductance of the rails. Thus, as will be appreciated, level detector 80 will output an oscillating signal only when the AC voltage that is proportional to the control/track current and the AC voltage that is proportional to the local voltage are nominally in phase, because it is only then that output of synchronous switching element 65 and averaging filter 75 will output a positive polarity signal of sufficient magnitude.
Diodes 85, 90, 95 and 100 are coupled to local transformer 65 as shown in
The output level detector 80 and positive source +L are input into a half-wave doubler circuit 105. As is known in the art, a half-wave doubler circuit receives a DC source voltage and produces a DC output voltage of polarity opposite (the magnitude may differ) to that of its source voltage only if it also receives a second, oscillating input such as a square wave input. If either the source voltage or the oscillating input is missing, the half-wave doubler circuit outputs nothing. Essentially, a half-wave doubler circuit functions as a fail-safe AND gate, i.e. it produces an opposite polarity output only with an oscillating input AND an applied source voltage. Both inputs, oscillating and source voltage, are required for an opposite polarity output. With only one of the two inputs, no component or combination of component failures can produce an opposite polarity output. Examples of suitable half wave doubler circuits for use in the present invention are shown in
Thus, in
The output of half-wave doubler circuit 105 is input into optical isolator/vital AND gate 55. As noted above, optical isolator/vital AND gate 55 also receives the output of level detector 50. The optical isolator/vital AND gate 55 will output an oscillating signal only if: (i) the output of level detector 50 is an oscillating signal (meaning that the control/track current has been determined to be of sufficient magnitude to indicate that no train is present and not rail is broken), AND (ii) the output of half-wave doubler circuit 105 is a negative polarity voltage signal (meaning that the control/track current and local voltage are nominally in phase and thus there is not an insulated joint fault condition); if either signal is missing, then optical isolator/vital AND gate 55 outputs nothing.
The output of optical isolator/vital AND gate 55 is input into half-wave doubler circuit 110. Also input into the half-wave doubler circuit 110 is the negative source (−L) generated by diodes 85, 90, 95 and 100. The half-wave doubler circuit 110 will output a positive polarity signal only if the input it receives from optical isolator/vital AND gate 55 is an oscillating signal. Thus, a positive polarity signal output from the half-wave doubler circuit 110 proves that the control/track current is greater than the predetermined threshold value (e.g., 50 mA) and that the local AND control/track currents are nominally in phase. Because control/track input current magnitude and phase comparison are independently determined according to the present invention, sensitivity to control/track current is not influenced by phase or magnitude of the local input.
The output of the half-wave doubler circuit 110 may be used directly as an input to the railroad signaling system in question, wherein it acts as the vital relay output. However, in most applications, the output of the half-wave doubler circuit 110 is not of sufficient power for that purpose. Thus, as an alternative, as shown in
On each positive excursion at A of the control transformer 25, the pseudo contact of K1 closes and a 200 microsecond negative going pulse is delivered to terminal e of the 555 timer 140. In response, its output on pin f switches high for a much greater time, controlled by the resistor and capacitor connected to pins g & h. Additionally, the pseudo contacts of K2, coupled to 12V to 5V DC to DC converter 143, close and gate the triac 145 ON. The time is set to approximately 75% of one half the period of the operating frequency. For example, for 50 or 60 Hz applications, the time is set to approximately 6 milliseconds, and for 100 Hz applications, the time is set to approximately 3 milliseconds. It is expected B of the local transformer 75 is nominally in phase with A of the control transformer 25 and therefore the triac 145 is turned ON for a substantial portion of time during which A and B are simultaneously positive. It is important that the gate of the triac 145 be switched OFF before the negative half-cycle of A is initiated otherwise it will remain ON continuously and disrupt the synchronous rectification process. Limiting ON time of the gate of the triac 145 also allows for a moderate amount of phase shift of local with respect to control. By limiting the ON time of the gate of the triac 145 to 75% of one-half the period of the operating frequency, a phase shift of approximately 45 degrees can be tolerated. In track circuit operation, the control input will lag local due to inductance of the rails, and therefore, tolerance to phase shift is necessary. Thus, if A and B are nominally in phase, a positive voltage the level detector 80 and the half-wave doubler 105, thereby producing a negative polarity voltage signal that, as discussed above in connection with
If A and B are out of phase, meaning they are not nominally in phase, which can occur resulting from a failed insulated joint 3, synchronous rectification will produce a negative voltage. The level detector 80 will not respond to a negative voltage and thus the failed insulated joint 3 is detected because the relay 120 will de-energize.
It is shown that synchronous rectification is critical to the task of ensuring that local and control are essentially in phase but it is of great importance to ensure no component failures can mask the in phase relationship. For example, if the triac 145 or gate control thereof fails and the triac 145 is either shorted or ON continuously, the voltage at A1 will revert to a sine wave instead of half-wave rectification. In that event, the averaging filter 75 will average the input to the level detector 80 to zero volts; the level detector 80 will not respond and the relay 120 will de-energize. The averaging filter 75 was selected instead of a peak filter because its failure modes preclude the possibility of continued operation with a series of component failures.
Peak filtering is realized with a single capacitor. Under normal conditions, a peak filter will produce a much greater voltage than an averaging filter like averaging filter 75. However, the level detector 80 can be scaled to operate at a significantly greater voltage and, therefore, a peak filter could operate just as well. Sequential component failures are undetectable, however, and can result in inability to detect phase reversal as the result of a failed insulated joint 3. With a single capacitor, if either connection opens, the level detector 80 input will revert to positive half sine wave DC pulses. The level detector 80 will respond with an output approximately one-half the time corresponding to each input pulse. The pulsating response will ripple through to the final output stage (115), producing reduced voltage to the relay 120, but still sufficient to retain the relay 120 in an energized state. Thus, an open lead to the peak filter capacitor is undetectable. Subsequently, if the triac 145 or control thereof fails and it is continuously in conduction, the level detector 80 will continue its pulsating response with the relay 120 held energized. If phase reversal then occurs as a result of a failed insulated joint 3 it will be undetected and jeopardize integrity of the signal system.
With the averaging filter 75, disconnection of either capacitor thereof decreases the voltage to the level detector 80 and response to an AC input averages an output to zero. If both capacitors open, the net DC that is produced will decrease, but the level detector 80 will marginally continue to function. Thereafter, if the triac 145 shorts, it will provide an AC input to the averaging filter 75, which in turn will produce an output that is well blow the level required by level detector 80 (it will be at or near zero). The failure of triac 145 is thus detectable.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention which is to be given the breadth of the claims appended in any and all equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2537298 | Baughman | Jan 1951 | A |
2541879 | Martin | Feb 1951 | A |
2887570 | Leroy | May 1959 | A |
3011050 | Staples | Nov 1961 | A |
3263074 | Ihrig | Jul 1966 | A |
3287554 | Staples | Nov 1966 | A |
3819933 | Grundy | Jun 1974 | A |
4065081 | Huffman et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4188002 | Gilcher | Feb 1980 | A |
4258312 | Gilcher | Mar 1981 | A |
4298179 | Gilcher | Nov 1981 | A |
4314306 | Darrow | Feb 1982 | A |
4407470 | Gilcher | Oct 1983 | A |
4498650 | Smith et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4535959 | Gilcher | Aug 1985 | A |
4652776 | George | Mar 1987 | A |
4723739 | Franke | Feb 1988 | A |
5330134 | Ehrlich | Jul 1994 | A |
5737173 | Ross et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6494409 | Franke | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6545886 | Ireland | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060266889 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |