Patent Grant
10783733
The present disclosure relates to an electronic voting system and a control method.
During these years, some local governments are holding electronic voting. In an electronic voting system, authentication information regarding voters and votes cast by the voters should not be associated with each other in order to keep the votes secret.
In an electronic voting system disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication (Translation of PCT Application) No. 2011-517825, a voting participation ticket is transmitted to a communication terminal used to authenticate a voter, and the communication terminal anonymizes and transmits the voting participation ticket in order to keep the voter anonymous.
In addition, the electronic voting system needs to be reliable, and stored votes need to be resistant to alteration. In “Blockchain-based Electronic Voting System for Collective Intelligence”, Information Processing, vol. 57, issue 12, pp. 1204-1209, a blockchain is used to make a system reliable and prevent alteration to votes.
When a blockchain is used to manage voting in an electronic voting system, voters and votes are undesirably associated with each other if a blockchain including voting results is disclosed. As a result, a secret ballot is not achieved.
One non-limiting and exemplary embodiment provides an electronic voting system and the like that achieve a secret ballot.
In one general aspect, the techniques disclosed here feature an electronic voting system including a terminal, a plurality of authentication servers, and a plurality of voting servers. Each of the plurality of authentication servers includes an authentication processor configured to receive, from the terminal, authentication data including a first identifier (ID) associated with a voter and authentication information regarding the voter and configured to authenticate the voter using the received authentication data, a first memory storage configured to store a first blockchain including first transaction data indicating that the authentication processor has authenticated the voter, and a first synchronizing processor configured to synchronize the first blockchain stored in the first memory storage with one or more of other authentication servers. Each of the plurality of voting servers includes a voting processor configured to receive, from the terminal, voting data including a second ID associated with a vote cast by the voter and voting information indicating the vote, the second ID being different from the first ID, a second memory storage configured to store a second blockchain including, as second transaction data, the voting information included in the voting data received by the voting processor, and a second synchronizing processor configured to synchronize the second blockchain stored in the second memory storage with one or more of other voting servers. The terminal includes a data generating processor configured to generate the authentication data and transmit the generated authentication data to one of the plurality of authentication server. The data generating processor is further configured to generate the voting data, after the authentication performed by the authentication server is successfully completed by transmitting the authentication data to the authentication server, and transmit the generated voting data to one of the plurality of voting servers.
According to the present disclosure, a secret ballot is achieved.
It should be noted that general or specific embodiments may be implemented as a system, a method, an integrated circuit (IC), a computer program, a computer-readable storage medium such as a compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), or any selective combination thereof.
Additional benefits and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will become apparent from the specification and drawings. The benefits and/or advantages may be individually obtained by the various embodiments and features of the specification and drawings, which need not all be provided in order to obtain one or more of such benefits and/or advantages.
An electronic voting system according to an aspect of the present disclosure is an electronic voting system including a terminal, a plurality of authentication servers, and a plurality of voting servers. Each of the plurality of authentication servers includes an authentication processor configured to receive, from the terminal, authentication data including a first identifier (ID) associated with a voter and authentication information regarding the voter and configured to authenticate the voter using the received authentication data, a first memory storage configured to store a first blockchain including first transaction data indicating that the authentication processor has authenticated the voter, and a first synchronizing processor configured to synchronize the first blockchain stored in the first memory storage with one or more of other authentication servers. Each of the plurality of voting servers includes a voting processor configured to receive, from the terminal, voting data including a second ID associated with a vote cast by the voter and voting information indicating the vote, the second ID being different from the first ID, a second memory storage configured to store a second blockchain including, as second transaction data, the voting information included in the voting data received by the voting processor, and a second synchronizing processor configured to synchronize the second blockchain stored in the second memory storage with one or more of other voting servers. The terminal includes a data generating processor configured to generate the authentication data and transmit the generated authentication data to one of the plurality of authentication servers. The data generating processor is further configured to generate the voting data, after the authentication performed by the authentication server is successfully completed by transmitting the authentication data to the authentication server, and transmit the generated voting data to one of the plurality of voting servers.
According to this aspect, the electronic voting system can easily determine whether the ID used to authenticate the voter has already been used, that is, presence or absence of reuse of the ID, using a blockchain technique. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot while easily suppressing reuse of the ID used for the authentication.
For example, each of the plurality of authentication servers further includes a first transaction data generating processor configured to, if the authentication of the terminal is successfully completed, generate first transaction data, the first transaction data indicating that the authentication of the terminal has been successfully completed, and a first block generating processor configured to generate a first block including the first transaction data, and configured to connect the generated first block to the first blockchain.
According to this aspect, the electronic voting system uses data including IDs different between authentication of a legitimate voter and voting performed after the authentication. As a result, even after a result of the authentication and a vote are disclosed after an election, for example, a voter who has cast the vote is not identified. In addition, by managing data indicating the authentication and data indicating the vote using different blockchains, alteration to the data can be suppressed. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot.
For example, each of the plurality of voting servers further may include a second transaction data generating processor configured to, if the voting data is received from the terminal, generate the second transaction data, the second transaction data indicating the vote included in the received voting data and a second block generating processor configured to generate a second block including the second transaction data, and configured to connect the generated second block to the second blockchain.
According to this aspect, the electronic voting system stores, in the blockchain, data including the vote cast by the voter. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot while suppressing alteration to the vote cast by the voter.
For example, the second transaction data generating processor may generate a third block including third transaction data indicating that the authentication processor has been enabled to authenticate a plurality of electors, connect the generated third block to the second blockchain, generate a fourth block including fourth transaction data indicating that, as a result of the authentication of the voter performed by one of the plurality of authentication servers, the terminal has been enabled to receive a vote from the voter, and connect the generated fourth block to the second blockchain.
According to this aspect, the electronic voting system prompts the voter to input the vote on the basis of the authentication of the voter performed by the authentication server. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot while suppressing inputting of a vote by an unauthenticated voter.
For example, each of the plurality of voting servers may further include an anonymizing processor configured to determine whether the second transaction data generated by the second transaction data generator satisfies a predetermined criterion of anonymization, and configured to, if the predetermined criterion is satisfied, cause the second block generating processor to generate the second block and connect the second block to the second blockchain.
According to this aspect, the electronic voting system suppresses generation of a block until voters cast a plurality of votes and the criterion of anonymization is satisfied. If a plurality of votes that do not satisfy the criterion of anonymization are stored in a block, the votes included in the block might be compared with authentication data depending on the votes, and a secret ballot might not be achieved. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot whose secrecy is higher by anonymizing votes for each block.
For example, even when the anonymizing processor has determined that the second transaction data does not satisfy the predetermined criterion, if a certain voting period has ended, the second block generating processor may generate the second block and connect the second block to the second blockchain.
According to this aspect, when a voting period has ended without the criterion of anonymization being satisfied, the electronic voting system does not leave votes outside a block. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot whose secrecy is higher by anonymizing votes for each block without leaving votes outside a block.
For example, if the first ID included in the received authentication data is already included in the first blockchain, the authentication processor is configured to fail the authentication of the voter and prevent the terminal from transmitting the voting data.
According to this aspect, the electronic voting system stores, in the blockchain, data indicating that the voter has been authenticated. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot while suppressing alteration to the authentication of the voter.
For example, if the second ID included in the received voting data is already included in the second blockchain, the voting processor is configured to discard the received voting data.
According to this aspect, the electronic voting system can easily determine whether the ID used for voting has already been used, that is, presence or absence of reuse of the ID, using a blockchain technique. The electronic voting system therefore achieves a secret ballot while easily suppressing reuse of the ID used for the voting.
In addition, an electronic voting system according to an aspect of the present disclosure is an electronic voting system including a plurality of authentication servers and a plurality of voting servers. Each of the plurality of authentication servers includes an authentication processor configured to receive, from a terminal, authentication data including a first ID associated with a voter and authentication information regarding the voter, and configured to authenticate the voter using the received authentication data, a first memory storage configured to store a first blockchain including first transaction data indicating that the authentication processor has authenticated the voter, and a first synchronizing processor configured to synchronize the first blockchain stored in the first memory storage with one or more of other authentication servers. Each of the plurality of voting servers includes a voting processor configured to receive, from the terminal, voting data including a second ID associated with a vote cast by the voter and voting information indicating the vote, the second ID being different from the first ID, a second memory storage configured to store a second blockchain including, as second transaction data, the voting information included in the voting data received by the voting processor, and a second synchronizing processor configured to synchronize the second blockchain stored in the second memory storage with one or more of other voting servers.
According to this aspect, as with the foregoing electronic voting system, the electronic voting system achieves a secret ballot using a terminal that is not included therein.
In addition, a method for controlling a voting server according to an aspect of the present disclosure is a method for controlling one of a plurality of voting servers in an electronic voting system. The method includes receiving, from a terminal, voting data including an ID associated with a vote cast by a voter and voting information indicating the vote, storing, in a memory storage, a blockchain including, as transaction data, the voting information included in the received voting data, synchronizing, by a processor, the stored blockchain with one or more of other voting servers, generating, by the processor, if the voting data is received from the terminal, transaction data indicating the vote included in the received voting data, generating, by the processor, a block including the generated transaction data and connecting the generated block to the blockchain, and determining, by the processor, whether the generated transaction data satisfies a predetermined criterion of anonymization and, if the criterion is satisfied, generating the block and connecting the block to the blockchain.
According to this aspect, the voting server suppresses generation of a block until voters cast a plurality of votes and the criterion of anonymization is satisfied. If a plurality of votes that do not satisfy the criterion of anonymization are stored in a block, the votes included in the block might be compared with authentication data depending on the votes, and a secret ballot might not be achieved. The voting server therefore achieves a secret ballot whose secrecy is higher by anonymizing votes for each block.
In addition, a method for controlling an electronic voting system according to an aspect of the present disclosure is a method for controlling an electronic voting system including a terminal, a plurality of authentication servers, and a plurality of voting servers. The method includes receiving, from the terminal and by each of the plurality of authentication servers, authentication data including a first ID associated with a voter and authentication information regarding the voter; authenticating, by each of the plurality of authentication servers, the voter using the received authentication data; storing, in each of the plurality of authentication servers, a first blockchain including first transaction data indicating that the voter has been authenticated; synchronizing, by each of the plurality of authentication servers, the stored first blockchain with one or more of other authentication servers; receiving, from the terminal and by each of the plurality of voting servers, voting data including a second ID associated with a vote cast by the voter and voting information indicating the vote, the second ID being different from the first ID; storing, in each of the plurality of voting servers, a second blockchain including, as second transaction data, the voting information included in the received voting data received; synchronizing, by each of the plurality of voting servers, the stored second blockchain with one or more of other voting servers; generating, by a terminal, the authentication data and transmit the generated authentication data to one of the plurality of authentication servers; generating, by the terminal, the voting data after the authentication performed by the authentication server is successfully completed by transmitting the authentication data to the authentication server; and transmitting, by the terminal, the generated voting data to one of the plurality of voting servers.
As a result, the same advantageous effects as those produced by the electronic voting system are produced.
It should be noted that these general or specific aspects may be implemented as a system, a method, an IC, a computer program, a computer-readable recording medium such as a CD-ROM, or any selective combination thereof.
An embodiment will be specifically described hereinafter with reference to the drawings.
The embodiment that will be described hereinafter is a general or specific example. Values, shapes, materials, components, arrangement positions and connection modes of the components, steps, the order of the steps, and the like mentioned in the following embodiment are examples, and do not limit the present disclosure. Among the components described in the following embodiment, ones not described in the independent claims, which define broadest concepts, will be described as arbitrary components.
An electronic voting system that achieves a secret ballot will be described in the present embodiment.
1. System Configuration
The electronic voting system is a system for enabling voters to electronically vote using voting terminals. The electronic voting system performs an authentication process regarding voting between the voting terminals and authentication servers and then performs a voting process between the voting terminals and voting servers. A period in which the electronic voting system receives votes from the voters will be referred to as a “voting period”. People who vote using the electronic voting system will be referred to as “voters”, and people who have a right to vote will be referred to as “electors”.
The electronic voting system will be described hereinafter with reference to the drawings.
1.1 Overall Configuration of Electronic Voting System 10
The authentication servers 200a to 200c authenticate voters and manage information indicating authenticated voters. The authentication servers 200a to 200c use a known blockchain technique for the authentication of voters and the management of information. That is, the authentication servers 200a to 200c manage a transaction history of virtual transactions using a blockchain. Coins (also referred to as “authentication coins”) will be subjected to virtual transactions in the following description, but virtual transactions need not employ coins. In addition, the authentication servers 200a to 200c share a blockchain storing a transaction history of authentication coins and prevent alteration to the transaction history by mutually approving the blockchain. The authentication coins are generated by the authentication servers 200a to 200c and transmitted to the voting terminals 100a to 102c. After voters are successfully authenticated, the voting terminals 100a to 102c transmit the authentication coins to the authentication servers 200a to 200c. The transmission of the authentication coins will be referred to as an “authentication transaction”. The authentication coins are virtual coins, and the authentication servers 200a to 200c manage a transaction history of the authentication coins. The authentication coins each include an ID for identifying itself. The IDs of the authentication coins are associated with IDs assigned to electors in one-to-one correspondence. The IDs of the authentication coins will be referred to as “authentication IDs”.
The voting servers 300a to 300c manage votes cast by the voters. The voting servers 300a to 300c use a known blockchain technique to manage the votes. That is, the voting servers 300a to 300c manage a transaction history of virtual transactions using a blockchain. Coins (also referred to as “voting coins”) will be subjected to virtual transactions in the following description, but virtual transactions need not employ coins. In addition, the voting servers 300a to 300c share a blockchain storing a transaction history of voting coins and prevent alteration to the transaction history by mutually approving the blockchain. The authentication coins are generated by the voting servers 300a to 300c and transmitted to the voting terminals 100a to 102c through the authentication servers 200a to 200c. The transmission of the voting coins will be referred to as a “voting transaction” and transmission of the voting coins to candidates from the voting terminals 100a to 102c corresponds to voting in an election. The voting coins are virtual coins, and the voting servers 300a to 300c manage a transaction history of the voting coins. The voting terminals 100a to 102c transmit the voting coins to candidates during voting by the voters. The number of voting coins obtained by the candidates is the number of votes obtained by the candidates in electronic voting. The voting coins correspond to ballots used in a conventional election. The voting coins each include an ID for identifying itself. The IDs of the voting coins are associated with votes cast by the voters in one-to-one correspondence. The IDs of the voting coins will be referred to as “voting IDs”.
The IDs of the authentication coins and the IDs of the voting coins are different from each other.
The electronic voting system 10 is, for example, divided into three subsystems A, B, and C. The number of subsystems is not limited to three, and may be any number equal to or larger than 2.
The electronic voting system 10 distributes processes among the authentication servers 200a to 200c and the voting servers 300a to 300c and shares information so that the electronic voting system 10 can be used in a national or local election. The authentication servers 200a to 200c and the voting servers 300a to 300c prevent alteration to a transaction history by mutually approving the blockchain.
When voters vote using the voting terminal 100a provided at a polling station, for example, the authentication server 200a and the voting server 300a are also provided at the polling station. In this case, the subsystems A, B, and C are provided for polling stations. In a national election conducted in Japan, for example, tens of thousands of subsystems are used.
When voters vote at home through a network, on the other hand, the authentication server 200a and the voting server 300a may be provided for each attribute of electors (gender, place of residence, occupation, etc.). In this case, the subsystems A, B, and C are provided in accordance with the attributes of the electors.
A blockchain is a series of blocks, which are recording units, connected to one another as a chain. Each block includes a plurality of pieces of transaction data and a hash value of a previous block. More specifically, a block B2 includes a hash value of a previous block B1. A block B3 includes, as a hash value of the block B2, a hash value calculated from a plurality of pieces of transaction data included in the block B2 and the hash value of the block B1. Alteration to recorded transaction data is thus effectively prevented by connecting blocks as a chain while including the content of previous blocks as hash values.
If past transaction data is altered, hash values of blocks change. In reality, therefore, it is extremely difficult to make the altered block look like an original one, because all subsequent blocks need to be corrected.
Each piece of transaction data indicates generation and transmission of a new coin. The coin corresponds to an authentication coin or a voting coin.
The transaction data illustrated in
The voting terminal 100a, the authentication server 200a, and the voting server 300a will be described hereinafter in this order. The same holds for the other voting terminals, the other authentication servers, and the other voting servers.
1.2 Configuration of Voting Terminal 100a
The voting terminal 100a receives authentication information regarding a voter and a vote input by the voter and displays various pieces of information. The voting terminal 100a may be a mobile terminal owned by the voter (more specifically, a mobile phone terminal, a smartphone, or a personal computer) or a terminal prepared in a polling station.
The display unit 111 is a display device for displaying a voting screen. The term “screen” refers to a screen displayed, as an image, on a display device such as a liquid crystal display or an organic electroluminescent (EL) display. The same holds in the following description.
The input unit 112 receives authentication information and a vote from the voter during voting.
The transaction data generation section 113 generates authentication data for authenticating the voter and voting data for voting performed by the voter. The transaction data generation section 113 generates authentication transaction data for transmitting an authentication coin during authentication and voting transaction data for transmitting a voting coin during voting performed by the voter. The authentication data includes authentication information including an authentication ID unique to the voter and an electronic signature (also simply referred to as a “signature”) of the voting terminal 100a. The electronic signature is generated using a signature key for a hash value of the authentication information. The authentication transaction data is transaction data indicating a transaction for transmitting an authentication coin from the voting terminal 100a to the authentication server 200a. The authentication transaction data will also be referred to as “first transaction data”.
The voting data includes a vote in electronic voting and a signature of the voting terminal 100a. The vote is specifically information indicating a candidate to vote for or information indicating confidence or non-confidence. The voting transaction data is transaction data indicating a transaction for transmitting a voting coin, which has been transmitted from the authentication server 200a, to a candidate. The voting transaction data will also be referred to as “second transaction data”.
The transaction data generation section 113 generates authentication data and transmits the generated authentication data to the authentication server 200a. After the transaction data generation section 113 transmits the authentication data to the authentication server 200a and the authentication server 200a successfully authenticates the voter, the transaction data generation section 113 generates voting data and transmits the voting data to the voting server 300a.
The signature key used by the voting terminal 100a to generate a signature may be held by the voting terminal 100a in advance or, when authentication information is received from the voter, obtained from the authentication server 200a.
The communication unit 114 is a communication interface for communicating with the authentication server 200a and the voting server 300a. The communication may be based on transport layer security (TLS). In this case, the communication unit 114 may hold a private key for TLS communication.
1.3 Configuration of Authentication Server 200a
When the voting terminal 100a has accessed the screen data generation unit 211 for authentication, the screen data generation unit 211 generates screen data for drawing an authentication screen. More specifically, the screen data generation unit 211 generates screen data for drawing, on the voting terminal 100a, a screen for receiving authentication information from the voter.
The transaction data verification section 212 receives authentication transaction data from the voting terminal 100a and verifies the received authentication transaction data. After receiving authentication transaction data from the voting terminal 100a, the transaction data verification section 212 verifies whether a signature included in the received authentication transaction data is legitimate and whether the authentication information is legitimate. In the verification of the legitimacy of the authentication information, for example, whether the authentication information has been issued by the electronic voting system 10 in advance and whether the authentication information has been used twice or more during the voting period are verified. Whether the authentication information has been used twice or more is verified by referring to the storage unit 216 and determining whether the storage unit 216 stores an authentication transaction based on the authentication information. If verifying that the authentication information is legitimate as a result of the verification, the transaction data verification section 212 stores the authentication transaction data in the storage unit 216. The synchronization unit 215 transmits the legitimate authentication transaction data to the authentication servers 200b and 200c for synchronization.
After receiving the voting transaction data from the voting server 300a, the transaction data verification section 212 verifies whether a signature included in the voting transaction data is legitimate.
The transaction data generation section 213 generates authentication transaction data regarding an authentication transaction. The transaction data generation section 213 generates, in an initialization process, authentication transaction data for generating new authentication coins as many as the number of electors. Holders of the authentication coins at this moment are the electors.
The transaction data generation section 213 also generates voting transaction data for transmitting a voting coin, which has originally be transmitted from the voting server 300a, to the voting terminal 100a. The transaction data generation section 213 corresponds to a first transaction data generator.
The block generation unit 214 implements a consensus algorithm between the authentication servers 200a to 200c. The consensus algorithm may be one called “practical Byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT)” or may be another known consensus algorithm. If a consensus is reached about one or more authentication transactions using the consensus algorithm, the block generation unit 214 generates a block including authentication transaction data and stores the block in the storage unit 216. The block generation unit 214 then connects the generated block to a blockchain stored in the storage unit 216. The block generation unit 214 corresponds to a first block generator.
The synchronization unit 215 synchronizes blocks of a blockchain and authentication transaction data between the authentication servers 200a to 200c. The blocks of the blockchain are synchronized between the authentication servers 200a to 200c in a peer-to-peer manner. When authentication transaction data has been received from the voting terminal 100a and the transaction data verification section 212 has verified the legitimacy of the authentication transaction data, for example, the synchronization unit 215 transmits copies of the authentication transaction data to the authentication servers 200b and 200c in order to store the verified authentication transaction data in the storage units 216 of the authentication servers 200b and 200c. When the synchronization unit 215 has received authentication transaction data from the authentication servers 200b and 200c, on the other hand, the synchronization unit 215 stores the received authentication transaction data in the storage unit 216.
The storage unit 216 is a storage device storing authentication transaction data and blocks of a blockchain. The blockchain stored in the storage unit 216 will be referred to as a “first blockchain”.
The communication unit 217 is a communication interface for communicating with the voting terminal 100a and the voting server 300a. The communication may be based on TLS. In this case, the communication unit 217 may hold a private key for TLS communication.
The transaction data verification section 212 and the transaction data generation section 213 correspond to an authentication unit 212A that receives, from the voting terminal 100a, authentication data including the authentication ID (i.e., a first ID) associated with the voter and authentication information regarding the voter and that authenticates the voter using the received authentication data.
1.4 Configuration of Voting Server 300a
The voting terminal 100a accesses the screen data generation unit 311 for voting, and the screen data generation unit 311 generates screen data, which is drawing data for drawing a voting screen. More specifically, the screen data generation unit 311 obtains information regarding candidates from the candidate database 312 and generates screen data, which is drawing data for drawing a screen for receiving voting information from the voter, the screen being displayed on the voting terminal 100a.
The candidate database 312 is a database storing information regarding candidates. The candidate database 312 at least stores information for identifying candidates. More specifically, the candidate database 312 stores, as the information for identifying candidates, character strings indicating names of the candidates and may also store images of the candidates' faces or the like.
The transaction data verification section 313 receives voting transaction data from the voting terminal 100a and verifies the received voting transaction data. The transaction data verification section 313 verifies whether a signature included in the voting transaction data is legitimate and whether voting information is legitimate. In the verification of the legitimacy of the voting information, for example, whether the voting information has been issued by the electronic voting system 10 in advance and whether the voting information has been used twice or more during the voting period are verified. Whether the voting information has been used twice or more is verified by referring to the storage unit 318 and determining whether the storage unit 318 stores the voting information. If verifying that the voting information is legitimate as a result of the verification, the transaction data verification section 313 stores the voting transaction data in the storage unit 318. The synchronization unit 317 transmits the legitimate voting transaction data to the voting servers 300b and 300c for synchronization.
The transaction data generation section 314 generates voting transaction data regarding a voting transaction. The transaction data generation section 314 generates, in an initialization process, voting transaction data for generating new voting coins as many as the number of electors. A holder of the voting coins at this moment is the voting server 300a. Next, the transaction data generation section 314 generates voting transaction data (corresponds to third transaction data) for transmitting the voting coins to the authentication server 200a. The generated voting transaction data includes information indicating a holder of the voting coins (i.e., information indicating the authentication server 200a) and a signature of the voting server 300a. After the voting transaction data for transmitting the voting coins to the authentication server 200a is generated, the authentication server 200a holds the voting coins. The transaction data generation section 314 corresponds to a second transaction data generator.
The anonymization unit 315 determines the anonymity of voting transaction data stored in the storage unit 318. The anonymization unit 315 determines whether voting transaction data that is stored in the storage unit 318 and that is not yet included in a blockchain satisfies a certain criterion of anonymization. If determining that the voting transaction data satisfies the criterion of anonymization, the anonymization unit 315 causes the block generation unit 316 to generate a block. The criterion of anonymization is determined in advance on the basis of the number of electors and the number of candidates. The criterion of anonymization is, for example, k=3 of k-anonymity and l=2 or more of l-diversity. Description of k-anonymity and l-diversity can be found in “Privacy Protection Guide”, 6.1 k-anonymity (pp. 135-138), 6.5 l-diversity (pp. 157-159). Even if the criterion of anonymization is not satisfied, the anonymization unit 315 transmits a request to generate a block to the block generation unit 316 when an end time of a voting period has come, that is, when the voting period has ended. The criterion of anonymization can be regarded as a criterion of anonymity.
The block generation unit 316 implements a consensus algorithm between the voting servers 300a to 300c. The block generation unit 316 implements the consensus algorithm between the voting servers 300a to 300c on the basis of a request to implement the consensus algorithm transmitted from the anonymization unit 315. The consensus algorithm may be PBFT or may be another known consensus algorithm. If a consensus is reached, using the consensus algorithm, about voting transaction data for which the criterion of anonymization is satisfied, the block generation unit 316 generates a block including voting transaction data and stores the block in the storage unit 318. The block generation unit 316 then connects the generated block to a blockchain stored in the storage unit 318. The block generation unit 316 corresponds to a second block generator.
The block generation unit 316 also generates a block (corresponds to a third block) including voting transaction data (third transaction data) for transmitting voting coins to the authentication server 200a and connects the generated block to the blockchain. The third transaction data indicates that the authentication unit 212A (transaction data verification section 212) has become able to authenticate the electors.
The block generation unit 316 also generates a block (corresponds to a fourth block) including voting transaction data (fourth transaction data) for transmitting the voting coins from the authentication server 200a to the voting terminal 100a and connects the generated fourth block to a second blockchain. The fourth transaction data indicates that, as a result of the authentication of the voters performed by the authentication server 200a, the voting terminal 100a has become able to receive votes from the voters.
The synchronization unit 317 synchronizes blocks of a blockchain and voting transaction data between the voting servers 300a to 300c. The blocks of the blockchain are synchronized between the voting servers 300a to 300c in a peer-to-peer manner. When voting transaction data has been received from the voting terminal 100a and the transaction data verification section 313 has verified the legitimacy of the voting transaction data, for example, the synchronization unit 317 transmits copies of the voting transaction data to the voting servers 300b and 300c in order to store the verified voting transaction data in the storage units 318 of the voting servers 300b and 300c. When the synchronization unit 317 has received voting transaction data from the voting servers 300b and 300c, on the other hand, the synchronization unit 317 stores the received voting transaction data in the storage unit 318.
The storage unit 318 is a storage device storing voting transaction data and blocks of a blockchain. The blockchain stored in the storage unit 318 will be referred to as a “second blockchain”.
The communication unit 319 is a communication interface for communicating with the voting terminal 100a and the authentication server 200a. The communication may be based on TLS. In this case, the communication unit 319 may hold a private key for TLS communication.
The transaction data verification section 313 and the transaction data generation section 314 correspond to a voting unit 313A that receives, from the voting terminal 100a, voting data including voting IDs (i.e., second IDs) associated with votes cast by the voters and different from authentication IDs and voting information indicating the votes.
1.5 Voting Sequence Between Voting Terminals and Servers
A process performed by the electronic voting system 10 will be described hereinafter. Here, a process will be described in which voters are authenticated between the voting terminals 100a to 102c and the authentication servers 200a to 200c using authentication coins and voting is performed between the voting terminals 100a to 102c and the voting servers 300a to 300c using voting coins. In order to allow only authenticated voters to vote, voting coins are transmitted to the voting terminal 100a through the authentication server 200a.
An initialization process, a voting process, an ending process, and a process for disclosing voting results will be described hereinafter in this order.
The initialization process illustrated in
In step S101, the authentication server 200a performs an authentication initialization process. In the authentication initialization process, authentication transaction data for generating authentication coins including IDs (also referred to as “elector IDs”) distributed to electors in advance as authentication IDs is generated, and then a block including the generated authentication transaction data is generated. At this stage, holders of the authentication coins are electors identified on the basis of the elector IDs (refer to
In step S102, the voting server 300a performs a voting initialization process. In the voting initialization process, voting transaction data for generating voting coins as many as the number of electors is generated, and then a block including the generated voting transaction data is generated. At this stage, a holder of all the voting coins is the voting server 300a (refer to
In step S103, the voting server 300a generates voting transaction data for transmitting the voting coins generated in step S102 to the authentication server 200c and then generates a block including the generated voting transaction data. The voting server 300a transmits the generated voting transaction data to the authentication server 200c. Although a case in which the voting coins are transmitted to the authentication server 200c will be described as an example, the voting coins may be transmitted to the authentication server 200a or 200b, instead. At this stage, information indicating a holder of the voting coins transmitted to the authentication server 200c indicates the authentication server 200c (refer to
In step S104, the authentication server 200c performs a process for synchronizing with the authentication servers 200a and 200b. In this synchronization process, the authentication server 200c transmits the received voting transaction data to the authentication servers 200a and 200b using the synchronization unit 215. The synchronization units 215 of the authentication servers 200a and 200b store the voting transaction data received from the synchronization unit 215 of the authentication server 200c.
The voting process illustrated in
In step S201, the voting terminal 100a accesses the authentication server 200a. The voting terminal 100a accesses a website provided by the authentication server 200a, for example, and employs hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), HTTP over secure sockets layer (SSL)/transport layer security (TLS) (HTTPS), or the like.
In step S202, the authentication server 200a generates screen data regarding an authentication screen for obtaining an elector ID of a voter in accordance with the access in step S201 and transmits the screen data to the voting terminal 100a.
In step S203, the voting terminal 100a displays the authentication screen on the basis of the screen data transmitted in step S202 and receives authentication information regarding an elector ID of a voter. The voter views the authentication screen displayed on the voting terminal 100a and inputs, to the voting terminal 100a, the elector ID distributed in advance. The voter may manually input the elector ID or input the elector ID by reading a barcode or a two-dimensional code indicating the elector ID using the voting terminal 100a.
In step S204, the voting terminal 100a generates authentication transaction data using the elector ID input in step S203 as an authentication ID.
In step S205, the voting terminal 100a transmits the authentication transaction data generated in step S204 to the authentication server 200a. Although a case in which the authentication transaction data is transmitted to the authentication server 200a will be described as an example, the authentication transaction data may be transmitted to the authentication server 200b or 200c, instead. The authentication server 200a receives the transmitted authentication transaction data.
In step S206, the authentication server 200a verifies the authentication transaction data received from the voting terminal 100a in step S205. In the verification of the authentication transaction data, a blockchain of the authentication transaction data stored in the storage unit 216 is referred to, and whether the elector ID included in the authentication transaction data received from the voting terminal 100a is stored in the blockchain. If it is determined that the elector ID is not stored in the blockchain, the verification of the authentication transaction data is successfully completed. If it is determined that the elector ID is already stored, the verification of the authentication transaction data fails.
If the verification of the authentication transaction data fails in step S206, the authentication server 200a performs an error process (not illustrated). In the error process, for example, an error message is transmitted to the voting terminal 100a. The error message may include a message such as “Not an elector” or “Already authenticated. Same elector ID unavailable”. In the error process, a future voting action, such as transmission of voting data performed by the voting terminal 100a, is prohibited.
If the verification of the authentication transaction data is successfully completed in step S206, the process proceeds to step S207.
In step S207, the authentication server 200a transmits copies of the authentication transaction data to the authentication servers 200b and 200c. The authentication servers 200b and 200c verify the received authentication transaction data.
In step S208, the authentication servers 200a to 200c implement the consensus algorithm. By implementing the consensus algorithm, it is verified that the received authentication transaction data indicates a legitimate transaction. The authentication servers 200a to 200c generate a block including the verified authentication transaction data. As a result, a block including the authenticated elector ID is generated, and even if authentication transaction data including the same elector ID is received thereafter, it can be determined that the same elector ID has been used twice by referring to the blockchain. At this stage, the holder of an authentication coin including the authenticated elector ID of the elector has been changed to the authentication server 200a (refer to
In step S209, the authentication server 200a generates voting transaction data for transmitting a voting coin to the voting terminal 100a that has transmitted the authentication transaction data in step S205 and transmits the generated voting transaction data to the voting terminal 100a and the voting server 300a.
In step S210, the authentication server 200a transmits copies of the generated voting transaction data to the authentication servers 200b and 200c to synchronize the voting transaction data. The authentication servers 200a to 200c store the voting coin relating to the generated voting transaction data as a used coin.
In step S211, the voting server 300a verifies the voting transaction data received from the authentication server 200a in step S209. In the verification of the voting transaction data, a blockchain of the voting transaction data stored in the storage unit 318 is referred to, and whether a voting ID included in the voting transaction data received from the authentication server 200a is stored in the blockchain is determined. If it is determined that the voting ID is not stored in the blockchain, the verification of the voting transaction data is successfully completed. If it is determined that the voting ID is already stored in the blockchain, the verification of the voting transaction data fails.
If the verification of the voting transaction data fails in step S211, the voting server 300a performs an error process (not illustrated). In the error process, for example, an error message is transmitted to the voting terminal 100a. The error message may include a message such as “Already voted. Same ID unavailable”. In the error process, a future voting action, such as transmission of voting data performed by the voting terminal 100a, is prohibited.
In step S212, the voting server 300a transmits copies of the voting transaction data to the voting servers 300b and 300c. The voting servers 300b and 300c verify the received voting transaction data.
In step S213, the voting servers 300a to 300c implement the consensus algorithm. By implementing the consensus algorithm, it is verified that the received voting transaction data indicates a legitimate transaction. The voting servers 300a to 300c generate a block including the verified voting transaction data. At this stage, the holder of a voting coin transmitted to the voter for whom the verification of the authentication transaction data has been successfully completed in step S206 has been changed to the voting terminal 100a (refer to
In step S221, the voting terminal 100a accesses the voting server 300a. The voting terminal 100a accesses a website provided by the voting server 300a, for example, and employs HTTP, HTTPS, or the like.
In step S222, the voting server 300a generates screen data regarding a voting screen for voting performed by the voter in accordance with the access in step S221 and transmits the screen data to the voting terminal 100a. At this time, the voting server 300a refers to the candidate database 312 and generates screen data including a list of candidates. The voting screen is a screen used to select a candidate to vote for.
In step S223, the voting terminal 100a displays the voting screen on the basis of the screen data transmitted in step S222 and receives information indicating a candidate to vote for. The voter views the voting screen displayed on the voting terminal 100a and inputs voting information, which indicates a candidate to vote for. The voter may input the voting information by operating the screen displayed on the display device or by manually inputting information such as a name of the candidate to vote for. Upon receiving, from the voter, the voting information indicating the candidate to vote for, the voting terminal 100a generates voting transaction data including the voting information. The voting transaction data is used to transmit the voting coin to the candidate to vote for. The voting terminal 100a transmits the generated voting transaction data to the voting server 300a.
In step S224, the voting server 300a verifies the voting transaction data received from the voting terminal 100a in step S223. In the verification of the voting transaction data, the blockchain of the voting transaction data stored in the storage unit 318 is referred to, and whether the voting ID included in the voting transaction data received from the voting terminal 100a is stored in the blockchain is determined. If it is determined that the voting ID is not stored in the blockchain, the verification of the voting transaction data is successfully completed. If it is determined that the voting ID is already stored in the blockchain, the verification of the voting transaction data fails.
If the verification of the voting transaction data fails in step S224, the voting server 300a performs an error process (not illustrated). In the error process, for example, an error message is transmitted to the voting terminal 100a. The error message may include a message such as “Already voted. Same voting ID unavailable”.
If the verification of the voting transaction data is successfully completed in step 224, the process proceeds to step S225.
In step S225, the voting server 300a transmits copies of the voting transaction data to the voting servers 300b and 300c. The voting servers 300b and 300c verify the received voting transaction data and store the voting transaction data in the storage unit 318.
In step S226, the voting servers 300a to 300c implement the consensus algorithm. By implementing the consensus algorithm, it is verified that the received voting transaction data indicates a legitimate transaction. If it is verified that the received voting transaction data indicates a legitimate transaction, a block including the verified voting transaction data is generated. As a result, a block including the voting ID that has been used for voting is generated, and even if voting transaction data including the same voting ID is received thereafter, it can be determined that the same voting ID has been used twice by referring to the blockchain. At this stage, the holder of the voting coin used by the voter for voting has been changed to a candidate X, for whom the voter has voted (refer to
The consensus algorithm need not be implemented in step S226 every time, and may be implemented only when a certain condition is satisfied. The certain condition is, for example, that voting transaction data included in a block satisfies the criterion of anonymization. This will be described hereinafter.
First, the criterion of anonymization will be described.
Here, k=2 of k-anonymity and I=3 of l-diversity will be described as an example of the criterion of anonymization.
If the block generation unit 316 generates a block including a plurality of pieces of voting transaction data before the plurality of pieces of voting transaction data satisfy the criterion of anonymization, candidates for whom voters have voted can be identified. This is because a malicious third party who can refer to both a blockchain storing authentication transaction data and a blockchain storing voting transaction data can identify electors from the blockchain storing the authentication transaction data and candidates for whom the electors have voted from the blockchain storing the voting transaction data at the same moment.
If a block including a piece of voting transaction data illustrated in
Even if a malicious third party refers to a blockchain storing authentication transaction data and identifies voters, therefore, it is difficult to identify the voters from voting coins since a blockchain storing voting transaction data at the same moment includes a plurality of voting coins. As a result, it is difficult to identify correspondences between voters and candidates for whom the voters have voted, that is, a candidate for whom each voter has voted is not identified.
As illustrated in
If the anonymization unit 315 determines in step S231 that the voting transaction data satisfies the criterion of anonymization (YES in step S231), the voting servers 300a to 300c implement the consensus algorithm in step S226.
If the anonymization unit 315 determines that the voting transaction data does not satisfy the criterion of anonymization (NO in step S231), on the other hand, the voting process ends without the consensus algorithm being implemented. In this case, if the anonymization unit 315 determines that a voting process performed for a voter different from a voter who has performed the foregoing voting process satisfies the criterion of anonymization (YES in step S231), the block generation unit 316 implements the consensus algorithm and generates a block.
As a result, a plurality of pieces of voting transaction data that satisfy the criterion of anonymization are included in a block. Even if the block is disclosed, therefore, correspondences between voters and candidates for which the voters have voted are not identified, that is, the votes are kept secret.
As illustrated in
In step S302, the storage unit 318 generates a block including voting transaction data stored in the storage unit 318 but not yet included in a blockchain and connects the generated block to the blockchain. At this time, the block may be generated and connected to the blockchain even if the voting transaction data stored in the storage unit 318 but not yet included in the blockchain does not satisfy the criterion of anonymization.
In step S303, the voting servers 300a to 300c implement the consensus algorithm. Step S303 is the same as step S226.
As a result, the voting servers 300a to 300c can connect all voting transaction data to a blockchain.
The process illustrated in
Although a case in which the voting server 300a is accessed will be described as an example, the same holds when the voting server 300b or 300c is accessed.
In step S401, the screen data generation unit 311 of the voting server 300a determines whether it is a period in which voting results may be disclosed. The period in which voting results may be disclosed will also be referred to as a “disclosure period”. A disclosure period comes after an end of a voting period, for example, that is, after voting ends. If the screen data generation unit 311 determines in step S401 that it is a disclosure period (YES in step S401), the process proceeds to step S402. If not (NO in step S401), the process proceeds to step S411.
In step S402, the screen data generation unit 311 obtains a blockchain storing voting transaction data stored in the storage unit 318.
In step S403, the screen data generation unit 311 generates screen data regarding a voting result screen on the basis of information included in the blockchain obtained in step S402. The screen data generation unit 311 then transmits the generated screen data to the terminal 110 to display the voting result screen on the terminal 110.
In step S411, the screen data generation unit 311 performs an error process. In the error process, for example, an error message is transmitted to the terminal 110. The error message may include a message such as “Not a disclosure period. Voting results unavailable”.
Now, an example of a screen displayed on the voting terminal 100a for voting in the electronic voting system 10 and a screen displayed on the voting terminal 100a for disclosure of voting results will be described.
The voting terminal 100a illustrated in
The screen illustrated in
The terminal 110 illustrated in
The screen illustrated in
The terminal 110 presents voting results with this kind of screen.
1.6 Advantageous Effects Produced by Embodiment
An electronic voting system 10 according to the present embodiment employs data including IDs different between authentication of legitimate voters and voting performed after the authentication. As a result, even if results of authentication and votes are disclosed after an election, for example, voters who have cast the votes are not identified. In addition, since data indicating the authentication and data indicating the votes are stored in different blockchains, the data is not altered. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot.
In addition, the electronic voting system 10 stores data including votes cast by voters in a blockchain. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot while suppressing alteration to the votes cast by the voters.
In addition, the electronic voting system 10 enables voters to vote on the basis of authentication of the voters performed by the authentication servers 200a to 200c. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot while avoiding voting performed by unauthenticated voters.
In addition, the electronic voting system 10 does not generate a block until voters cast a plurality of votes and the criterion of anonymization is satisfied. If a plurality of votes that do not satisfy the criterion of anonymization are stored in a block, the votes including in the block might be compared with authentication data using information indicating the correspondence of a generation time of the block depending on the votes, and a secret ballot might not be achieved. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot whose secrecy is higher by anonymizing votes for each block.
In addition, when a voting period has ended without the criterion of anonymization being satisfied, the electronic voting system 10 does not leave votes outside a block. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot whose secrecy is higher by anonymizing votes for each block without leaving votes outside a block.
In addition, the electronic voting system 10 determines whether an ID used to authenticate a voter has already been used, that is, presence or absence of reuse of an ID, using a blockchain technique. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot while easily suppressing reuse of an ID used for authentication.
In addition, the electronic voting system 10 stores, in a blockchain, data indicating that a voter has been authenticated. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot while suppressing alteration to the authentication of the voter.
In addition, the electronic voting system 10 easily determines whether an ID used for voting has already been used, that is, presence or absence of reuse of an ID, using a blockchain technique. The electronic voting system 10 therefore achieves a secret ballot while easily suppressing reuse of an ID used for voting.
2. Modifications
Although the present disclosure has been described on the basis of the embodiment, it is needless to say that the present disclosure is not limited to the embodiment. The present disclosure includes the following cases.
(1) Although the authentication servers and the voting servers are described as different apparatuses in the above embodiment, the authentication servers and the voting servers may be the same apparatuses, instead.
(2) Although authentication and voting are achieved by transmitting authentication coins and voting coins in the above embodiment, the coins are used as an example of a virtual transaction tool, and the virtual transaction tool is not limited to coins.
(3) Although a block is generated when it has been determined that the criterion of anonymization is satisfied in the above embodiment, a block may be generated without the criterion of anonymization being satisfied if the number of votes exceeds a certain percentage of electors. As a result, even if voting results are one-sided, alteration to voting results can be prevented by generating a block.
(4) Although the authentication servers transmit voting coins to the voting terminals in the above embodiment, voting transactions in which voting coins are transmitted to the voting terminals may be transmitted to the voting servers, instead. Alternatively, the voting servers may receive voting transactions from the authentication servers and verify the voting transactions. In this case, the transmission of the voting coins to the voting terminals can also be managed using a blockchain.
(5) Although the disclosure of voting results is performed on the basis of access from a voting terminal in the above embodiment, any terminal capable of accessing a voting server may be used. Alternatively, a voting server may disclose a blockchain including a voting transaction.
(6) Although electronic voting for an election has been described as an example in the above embodiment, the electronic voting system may be used for conventional voting or a questionnaire, instead. When the electronic voting system is used for a decision-making process in a general meeting of stockholders or a questionnaire, for example, alteration to a decision or results of the questionnaire can be prevented.
(7) Each apparatus in the above embodiment is specifically a computer system including a microprocessor, a read-only memory (ROM), a random-access memory (RAM), a hard disk unit, a display unit, a keyboard, and a mouse. The RAM or the hard disk unit stores a computer program. Each apparatus achieves the functions thereof when the microprocessor operates in accordance with the computer program. The computer program is obtained by combining a plurality of instruction codes indicating commands for a computer in order to achieve the certain functions.
(8) Some or all of the components of each apparatus in the above embodiment may be achieved by a single system large-scale integration (LSI) circuit. The system LSI circuit is a super-multifunctional LSI circuit fabricated by integrating a plurality of components on a single chip and is specifically a computer system including a microprocessor, a ROM, and a RAM. The RAM stores a computer program. The system LSI circuit achieves functions thereof when the microprocessor operates in accordance with the computer program.
Alternatively, each of the components of each apparatus may be achieved by a single chip, or some or all of the components of each apparatus may be achieved by a single chip.
Although the term “system LSI circuit” has been used, a term “IC”, “LSI circuit”, “super LSI circuit”, or “ultra LSI circuit” might be used depending on a degree of integration. In addition, some or all of the components of each apparatus in the above embodiment need not necessarily be achieved by an LSI circuit and may be achieved by a dedicated circuit or a general-purpose processor, instead. A field-programmable gate array (FPGA) that can be programmed after an LSI circuit is fabricated or a reconfigurable processor capable of reconfiguring connections and settings of circuit cells inside an LSI circuit may be used, instead.
If a technique for fabricating an integrated circuit that replaces LSI becomes available as a result of evolution of semiconductor technologies or derivative techniques, the functional blocks may be integrated using the technique. Application of biotechnology is one of such possibilities.
(9) Some or all of the components of each apparatus may be achieved by an IC card or a separate module removably attached to each apparatus. The IC card or the module is a computer system including a microprocessor, a ROM, and a RAM. The IC card or the module may include the super-multifunctional LSI circuit. The IC card or the module achieves functions thereof when the microprocessor operates in accordance with a computer program. The IC card or the module may be tamper-resistant.
(10) The present disclosure may be one of the above-described methods. The present disclosure may be a computer program that achieves one of the methods or may be a digital signal including the computer program.
In addition, the present disclosure may be a computer-readable recording medium storing the computer program or the digital signal, such as a flexible disk, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, a magneto-optical (MO) disk, a digital versatile disc (DVD), a DVD-ROM, a DVD-RAM, a Blu-ray disc (BD; registered trademark), or a semiconductor memory. In addition, the present disclosure may be the digital signal stored in the recording medium.
In addition, the present disclosure may be the computer program or the digital signal transmitted through an electrical communication line, a wireless or wired communication line, a network typified by the Internet, datacasting, or the like.
In addition, the present disclosure may be a computer system including a microprocessor and a memory. The memory may store the computer program, and the microprocessor may operate in accordance with the compute program.
In addition, the present disclosure may be implemented by another independent computer system by storing the program or the digital signal in the recording medium and transporting the recording medium or by transporting the program or the digital signal through the network or the like.
(11) The above embodiment and the modifications may be combined with one another.
The electronic voting system 10 according to the present embodiment may be described as follows but not limited to these.
(a) An electronic voting system includes a voting terminal, a plurality of authentication servers, and a plurality of voting servers. The voting terminal includes a first transaction generator that generates a blockchain transaction. The first transaction generator generates an authentication transaction from an ID of an elector, transmits the authentication transaction to one of the plurality of authentication servers, generates a second voting transaction from a first voting transaction in which a right of voting is granted from the authentication server, and transmits the second voting transaction to one of the plurality of voting servers. Each of the plurality of authentication servers includes a first transaction verifier that receives the authentication transaction from the voting terminal and that verifies the authentication transaction, a second transaction generator that generates a blockchain transaction, and a first block generator that generates a block. The transaction verifier receives the authentication transaction, verifies whether two or more of an ID included in the authentication transaction exist in a blockchain, and if so, determines that the ID has been used twice. If the transaction verifier has successfully completed the authentication transaction, the second transaction generator generates the first voting transaction from a third voting transaction received from the voting server and transmits the first voting transaction to the voting terminal. Each of the plurality of voting servers includes a second transaction verifier that receives the second voting transaction from the voting terminal and that verifies the second voting transaction, a third transaction generator that generates a blockchain transaction, and a second block generator that generates a block. The second transaction verifier receives the second voting transaction from the voting terminal, verifies whether two or more of a right of voting included in the second voting transaction exist in a blockchain, and if so, determines that the right of voting has been used twice. The third transaction generator generates a third voting transaction of the right of voting and transmits the third voting transaction to the authentication server.
(b) In the electronic voting system according to (a), each of the plurality of voting servers further includes an anonymizer that determines, when a block of a blockchain is generated, whether a predetermined criterion of anonymization is satisfied. If determining that a plurality of voting transactions satisfy the predetermined criterion of anonymization, the anonymizer requests the second block generator to generate a block.
(c) In the electronic voting system according to (b), even when the criterion of anonymization is not satisfied, the anonymizer of each of the plurality of voting servers requests the second block generator to generate a block if determining that a voting period has ended.
As a result, whether a voter is an elector is determined between the voting terminal and the authentication server. If so, the authentication server grants the right of voting to the voting terminal, the right of voting having been originally granted from the voting server. The voting terminal can vote using the granted right of voting. Since the voting server verifies whether the right of voting has been used twice, illegitimate voting can be prevented without information regarding the elector. In addition, the voting server prevents alteration to a voting result using a blockchain for a voting transaction. Furthermore, even when there is a malicious third party who can refer to a blockchain of authentication transactions, a candidate for whom each voter has voted is not identified by anonymizing a voting transaction at the same moment as the authentication transaction during generation of a block. As a result, a safe electronic voting system can be constructed.
Although the electronic voting system and the like according to one or a plurality of aspects have been described above on the basis of the embodiment, the present disclosure is not limited to the embodiment. The one or plurality of aspects may include modes obtained by modifying the embodiment in various ways conceivable by those skilled in the art without deviating from the scope of the present disclosure and modes constructed by combining components in different embodiments.
The electronic voting system in the present disclosure achieves a secret ballot.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-057525 | Mar 2018 | JP | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6021200 | Fischer | Feb 2000 | A |
| 10546296 | Narasimhan | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 20060237535 | Watson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060289638 | Schilling | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20080105742 | Kim | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20110113439 | Delegue et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20160027229 | Spanos | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20170017954 | McDonough | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170046689 | Lohe | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170048209 | Lohe et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170048234 | Lohe | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170048235 | Lohe | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170109955 | Ernest | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170300978 | Narasimhan | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20190036932 | Bathen | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190088062 | Unagami | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190088063 | Unagami | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3364351 | Aug 2018 | EP |
| 3127275 | Jan 2019 | EP |
| 3457622 | Mar 2019 | EP |
| 2011-517825 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| WO-2005004023 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Antonopoulos, “Mastering Bitcoin,” O'Reilly Media, Inc., all pages. (Year: 2014). |
| Navya et al., “Electronic voting machine based on Blockchain technology and Aadhar verification,” International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, vol. 4, Issue 2, posted Feb. 28, 2018, all pages. (Year: 2018). |
| Tarasov et al., “The Future of E-Voting,” IADIS International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 148-165. (Year: 2017). |
| Hanifatunnisa et al., “Blockchain Based E-Voting Recording System Design,” IEEE, all pages. (Year: 2017). |
| Mudliar et al., “A Comprehensive Integration of National Identity with Blockchain Technology,” 2018 International Conference on Communication, Information & Computing Technology (ICCICT), Feb. 2-3, Mumbai, India, IEEE, all pages. (Year: 2018). |
| Shaheen et al., “Temper Proof Data Distribution for Universal Verifiability and Accuracy in Electoral Process Using Blockchain,” all pages. (Year: 2017). |
| The Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 15, 2018 for European Patent Application No. 18182012.7. |
| Shigeichiro Yamasaki, “Blockchain based Electric Voting System for Corrective Intelligence”, IPSJ Magazine, vol. 57, No. 12, Nov. 15, 2016, pp. 1204-1209 (Partial Translation). |
| Hiroshi Nakagawa, “Introduction to Privacy Protection”, Keiso shobo, Jan. 2016, pp. 135-138, pp. 157-159 (Partial Translation). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190019367 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62531159 | Jul 2017 | US |
