The present invention relates to an electronically controlled valve coupled to a lift cylinder which, in turn, is coupled to a carriage assembly, wherein the valve is controlled so as to close in the event of an unintended descent of the carriage assembly.
A materials handling vehicle is known in the prior art comprising a base unit including a power source and a mast assembly. A fork carriage assembly is coupled to the mast assembly for vertical movement relative to the power source with at least one cylinder effecting vertical movement of the carriage assembly. A hydraulic system is coupled to the cylinder for supplying a pressurized fluid to the cylinder, and includes an ON/OFF blocking valve positioned in a manifold for preventing the carriage assembly from drifting downwardly when raised via the cylinder to a desired vertical position relative to the power source. A metering valve, also positioned in the manifold, defines the rate at which pressurized fluid is metered to the cylinder to raise the carriage assembly and metered from the cylinder to lower the carriage assembly. A velocity fuse, i.e., a mechanical valve, is positioned in a base of the cylinder to prevent an unintended descent of the carriage assembly in excess of approximately 120 feet/minute. The velocity fuse has a fixed setpoint such that it is closed and stops fluid flow at the cylinder when the carriage assembly downward speed exceeds about 120 feet/minute. Hence, such fuses will not permit controlled downward movement of a carriage assembly at a speed in excess of about 120 feet/minute. However, it would be desirable to allow an intended descent of a carriage assembly in a controlled manner at a speed in excess of 120 feet/minute to improve productivity.
It is noted that when a velocity fuse closes, it closes very quickly resulting in a hydraulic fluid pressure spike occurring within the cylinder. Such a pressure spike can cause the cylinder to bow, buckle or otherwise deform. It would be desirable to reduce such pressure spikes. It would also be desirable to eliminate the velocity fuse so as to remove cost from the vehicle.
It is also known in the prior art to use flow control valves in place of velocity fuses. Those valves are designed to limit the flow of hydraulic fluid from a lift support cylinder such that a carriage assembly is prevented from moving downwardly at a speed in excess of about 120 feet/minute. Because such valves are mechanical, they too will not permit controlled downward movement of a carriage assembly at a speed in excess of about 120 feet/minute.
These deficiencies are addressed by the present invention, wherein an electronically controlled valve is provided which effects functions previously performed by the prior art velocity fuse/flow control valve and ON/OFF blocking valve.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, a materials handling vehicle is provided comprising: a base; a carriage assembly movable relative to the base; at least one cylinder coupled to the base to effect movement of the carriage assembly relative to the base; and a hydraulic system to supply a pressurized fluid to the cylinder. The hydraulic system includes an electronically controlled valve coupled to the cylinder. Further provided is a control structure for controlling the operation of the valve.
The control structure is preferably capable of energizing the valve so as to open the valve to permit the carriage assembly to be lowered in a controlled manner to a desired position relative to the base. The control structure de-energizes the valve in response to an operator-generated command to cease further descent of the carriage assembly relative to the base. The control structure further functions to close the valve in the event of an unintended descent of the carriage assembly in excess of a commanded speed. This serves to allow an intended, controlled descent of the carriage assembly at a desired speed, including speeds greater than 120 feet/minute, while preventing an unintended descent of the carriage assembly at a speed greater than a commanded speed. The valve preferably functions as a check valve when de-energized so as to block pressurized fluid from flowing out of the cylinder, and allows pressurized fluid to flow into the cylinder during a carriage assembly lift operation.
Preferably, the valve is positioned in a base of the cylinder. In accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention, the valve comprises a solenoid-operated, normally closed valve. This valve closes substantially immediately upon being de-energized. In accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention, the valve comprises a solenoid-operated, normally closed, proportional valve.
The control structure may comprise: an encoder unit associated with the carriage assembly for generating encoder pulses as the carriage assembly moves relative to the base; and a controller coupled to a commanded speed input device, the encoder unit and the valve for receiving the encoder pulses generated by the encoder unit and determining the rate of descent of the carriage assembly based on the received encoder pulses. The controller functions to de-energize the valve causing it to move from its powered open state to its closed state in the event the carriage assembly moves downwardly at a speed in excess of the commanded speed. Alternatively, in place of an encoder, a differential pressure sensor may be provided in the cylinder to sense a fluid pressure difference across an orifice associated with the cylinder. The orifice may be within the valve coupled to the cylinder. An increase in fluid pressure difference across the orifice occurs when an increase in fluid flow out of the cylinder is taking place, which corresponds to an increase in downward speed of the carriage assembly. Hence, the differential pressure sensor generates signals to the controller indicative of the downward speed of the carriage assembly. If an unexpected increase in fluid pressure difference across the orifice occurs due to an unexpected increase in fluid flow out of the cylinder, which unexpected pressure change is indicative of an unintended rate of descent of the carriage assembly, the controller functions to de-energize the valve causing it to move from its powered open state to its closed state.
In the embodiment where the valve comprises a solenoid-operated, normally closed, proportional valve, the controller preferably slowly closes the valve in the event the carriage assembly moves downwardly at a speed in excess of the commanded speed as sensed by the encoder, or an unexpected increase in fluid pressure difference occurs across an orifice, as sensed by the differential pressure sensor. For example, the controller may cause the valve to move from its powered open position to its closed position over a time period of from about 0.3 second to about 1.0 second. Alternatively, the controller may cause the valve to move from its powered open position to its closed position over a time period of from about 0.5 second to about 0.7 second.
The base may comprise a power unit and the carriage assembly may comprise a platform assembly which moves relative to the power unit along a mast assembly. Alternatively, the base may comprise a load handler assembly and the carriage assembly may comprise a fork carriage assembly which moves relative to the load handler assembly.
In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the control structure controls the operation of the valve such that the valve is closed in the event the following two conditions are met: 1) unintended descent of the carriage assembly in excess of the commanded speed, and 2) unintended descent of the carriage assembly in excess of a predefined threshold speed, such as 120 feet/minute. The control structure is preferably capable of energizing the valve so as to open the valve to permit the carriage assembly to be lowered in a controlled manner to a desired position relative to the base at a speed in excess of the predefined threshold speed.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, a materials handling vehicle is provided comprising: a base; a carriage assembly movable relative to the base; at least one cylinder coupled to the base to effect movement of the carriage assembly relative to the base; and a hydraulic system to supply a pressurized fluid to the cylinder. The hydraulic system includes an electronically controlled valve coupled to the cylinder. Further provided is control structure to control the operation of the valve such that the valve is closed in the event of a loss of pressure in the fluid being supplied by the hydraulic system to the valve.
The control structure may be capable of energizing the valve so as to open the valve to permit the carriage assembly to be lowered in a controlled manner to a desired position relative to the base. Preferably, the control structure de-energizes the valve when the carriage assembly is not being lowered in a controlled manner relative to the base.
The valve may function as a check valve when de-energized so as to block pressurized fluid from flowing out of the cylinder, and allowing pressurized fluid to flow into the cylinder during a carriage assembly lift operation.
The control structure may comprise: an encoder unit associated with the carriage assembly for generating encoder pulses as the carriage assembly moves relative to the base; and a controller coupled to the encoder unit and the valve for receiving the encoder pulses generated by the encoder unit and monitoring the rate of descent of the carriage assembly based on the received encoder pulses. The controller functions to de-energize the valve causing it to move from its powered open state to its closed state in the event the carriage assembly moves downwardly in an unintended manner at a speed in excess of a commanded speed. Alternatively, the controller functions to de-energize the valve causing it to move from its powered open state to its closed state in the event the carriage assembly moves downwardly in an unintended manner at a speed in excess of a commanded speed and a predefined speed.
In the event the rate of descent of the carriage assembly exceeds a commanded speed or an unexpected fluid pressure drop occurs in the cylinder, the controller may slowly close the valve over a period of time greater than or equal to 0.1 second.
Referring now to the drawings, and particularly to
A mast piston/cylinder unit 50 is provided in the first mast 28a for effecting movement of the second mast 28b and the platform assembly 30 relative to the first mast 28a and the power unit 20, see
The load handling assembly 40 comprises a first structure 42 which is movable back and forth transversely relative to the platform assembly 30, as designated by an arrow 200 in
A piston/cylinder unit 70 is provided in the second structure 44 for effecting vertical movement of the fork carriage assembly 60 relative to the second structure 44, see
A hydraulic system 80 is illustrated in
Positioned within or coupled to the base 50d of the cylinder 50a is a first electronically controlled valve 300, which valve is coupled to the first manifold 90 and the controller 400, see
During a platform assembly 30 lowering operation, the electronically controlled valve 300 is energized such that it is opened to allow pressurized fluid in the cylinder 50a to return to a holding or storage reservoir 100 resulting in the second mast 28b, the platform assembly 30 and the load handling assembly 40 moving downwardly relative to the power unit 20. An encoder unit 401 is provided for generating encoder pulses as a function of movement of the platform assembly 30 relative to the power unit 20, see
The encoder unit 401 comprises an encoder 402 which generates pulses to the controller 400 (not shown in
In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, if the rate of unintended descent of the platform assembly 30 exceeds a commanded speed and a predefined threshold speed, such as when there is a loss of hydraulic pressure in the fluid metered from the cylinder 50a, the controller 400 generates a signal, i.e., turns off power to the valve 300, causing the valve 300 to close. As used herein, “an unintended descent in excess of a commanded speed and a predefined speed” means that the rate of descent of the carriage assembly: 1) exceeds a commanded speed, as defined above, and 2) exceeds a predefined threshold speed, such as a fixed speed of 120 feet/minute. In this alternative embodiment, if the intended rate of descent is 90 feet/minute and the actual or sensed rate of descent is 125 feet/minute, the controller will generate a signal to turn off power to the valve. Further with regards to the alternative embodiment, if the intended rate of descent is 150 feet/minute and the sensed rate of descent is 130 feet/minute, the controller will not generate a signal to turn off power to the valve. Still further with regards to the alternative embodiment, if the intended rate of descent is 90 feet/minute and the sensed rate of descent is 110 feet/minute, the controller will not generate a signal to turn off power to the valve.
As noted above, the predefined threshold speed may comprise a fixed speed of 120 feet/minute. However, the predefined threshold speed may comprise a fixed speed greater than or less than 120 feet/minute. It is noted that, in response to an operator-generated command to lower the platform assembly 30, the controller 400 may energize the valve 300 so as to open the valve 300 to allow the platform assembly 30 to be lowered at a rate in excess of 120 feet/minute. For this operation, however, the descent is intended and controlled. Hence, in this embodiment, the controller 400 does not de-energize the valve 300 during a controlled descent of the platform assembly 30 at speeds in excess of 120 feet/minute, i.e., the threshold speed.
In accordance with the present invention, the valve 300 can be rapidly closed. However, because the valve 300 is a proportional valve, its closing can be controlled such that the valve 300 closes over an extended time period. In the illustrated embodiment, the closing of the valve 300 is controlled by varying the control current to the valve 300. For example, the controller 400 may cause the valve 300 to close over an extended time period, such as between about 0.3 to about 1.0 second and, preferably, from about 0.5 to about 0.7 second, so that a portion of the kinetic energy of the moving platform assembly 30, the load handling assembly 40 and any loads on the assemblies 30 and 40 is converted into heat, i.e., a pressure drop occurs across an orifice within the valve 300 resulting in heating the hydraulic fluid. Consequently, the magnitude of a pressure spike within the cylinder 50a, which occurs when the piston 50b stops its downward movement within the cylinder 50a, is reduced.
Closing the valve 300 over an extended time period will result in the platform assembly 30 moving only a small distance further than it would otherwise move if the valve 300 were closed immediately. For example, if the controller 400 begins to close the valve 300 when the platform assembly 30 is moving at a speed of 200 feet/minute and 0.5 second later moves the valve 300 to a near completely closed state such that the speed of the platform assembly 30 is 40 feet/minute, the platform assembly 30 will have moved only one foot during that extended time period (0.5 second). When the platform assembly 30 comes to a complete stop, it will have moved a total distance of about 1.042 feet.
In the illustrated embodiment, a control structure comprises the combination of the controller 400 and the encoder unit 401; however, other structures can be used to make up the control structure as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, a differential pressure sensor (not shown) may be associated with the cylinder 50a to sense fluid pressure differences across an orifice, such as an orifice within the valve 300. The sensor may comprise two fluid ports positioned on opposing sides of the orifice within the valve 300. Those ports communicate with a differential pressure sensor, which senses differences in fluid pressure across the orifice within the valve 300. An increase in fluid pressure difference across the orifice may occur when an increase in fluid flow out of the cylinder 50a occurs. In response to such fluid pressure differences, the pressure sensor generates signals to the controller 400, which signals may be indicative of the downward speed of the carriage assembly 30. If an unexpected increase in fluid pressure difference occurs across the orifice due to an unexpected increase in fluid flow out of the cylinder 50a, thereby indicating an unintended descent of the platform assembly 30, the controller 400 functions to de-energize the valve 300 causing it to move from its powered open state to its closed state.
Referring to
If the controller 400 determines during step 705 that the value in the first lockout memory location is 0, the controller 400 continuously monitors an operator generated commanded speed (designated “CS” in
If, after an unintended descent fault has occurred and in response to an operator-generated command to lift the platform assembly 30, the piston/cylinder unit 50 is unable to lift the platform assembly 30, then the value in the first lockout memory location remains set to 1. On the other hand, if, in response to an operator-generated command to lift the platform assembly 30, the piston/cylinder unit 50 is capable of lifting the platform assembly 30 above the first reference height plus a first reset height, as indicated by signals generated by the encoder 402, the controller 400 resets the value in the first lockout memory location to 0, see steps 714 and 716. Thereafter, the controller 400 will allow the valve 300 to be energized such that it can be opened to allow controlled descent of the platform assembly 30. Movement of the platform assembly 30 above the first reference height plus a first reset height indicates that the hydraulic system 80 is functional. The first reset height may have a value of 0.25 inch to about 4 inches.
If the controller 400 determines during step 705 that the value in the first lockout memory location is 1, the controller 400 continuously monitors the height of the platform assembly 30, via signals generated by the encoder 402, to see if the platform assembly 30 moves above the first reference height plus the first reset height, see step 714.
The structure defining the first manifold 90 may vary and that shown in
Referring to
Coupled to or near the base 70d of the cylinder 70a is a second electronically controlled valve 600, see
During a fork carriage assembly 60 lowering operation, the electronically controlled valve 600 is energized such that it is opened to allow pressurized fluid to return to the storage reservoir 100 resulting in the fork carriage assembly 60 moving downwardly relative to the load handling assembly 40. An encoder unit 701 is provided for generating encoder pulses as a function of movement of the fork carriage assembly 60 relative to the load handling assembly 40. In response to encoder pulses, the controller 400 can determine the position of the fork carriage assembly 60 relative to the load handling assembly 40 and also the speed of the fork carriage assembly 60 relative to the load handling assembly 40.
The encoder unit 701 comprises an encoder 702 fixedly coupled to the second structure 44 of the load handling assembly 40, which generates pulses to the controller 400 in response to extension and retraction of a wire or cable 704. The cable 704 is fixed at one end to the roller 70c and coupled at the other end to a spring-biased spool 703. The cable 704 rotates the spool 703 in response to movement of the fork carriage assembly 60 relative to the second structure 44. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, if the rate of descent of the fork carriage assembly 60 exceeds an operator-commanded speed, such as when there is a loss of hydraulic pressure, the controller 400 generates a signal, i.e., turns off power to the valve 600, causing the valve 600 to close. The valve 600 in the illustrated embodiment is not a proportional valve. However, a proportional valve similar to valve 300 could be used in place of the valve 600.
In accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention, if the rate of unintended descent of the fork carriage assembly 60 exceeds a commanded speed and a predefined threshold speed, such as when there is a loss of hydraulic pressure in the fluid provided to the cylinder 70a, the controller 400 generates a signal, i.e., turns off power to the valve 600, causing the valve 600 to close. An example predefined threshold speed is 120 feet/minute. It is noted that, in response to an operator-generated command to lower the fork carriage assembly 60, the controller 400 may energize the valve 600 so as to open the valve 600 to allow the fork carriage assembly 60 to be lowered at a rate in excess of 120 feet/minute. For this operation, however, the descent is intended and controlled. Hence, in this embodiment, the controller 400 does not de-energize the valve 600 during a controlled descent of the fork carriage assembly 60 at speeds in excess of 120 feet/minute.
Referring to
If the controller 400 determines during step 802 that the value in the second lockout memory location is 0, the controller 400 continuously monitors an operator generated commanded speed (designated “CS” in
If, after an unintended descent fault has occurred and in response to an operator-generated command to lift the fork carriage assembly 60, the piston/cylinder unit 70 is unable to lift the fork carriage assembly 60, then the value in the second lockout memory location remains equal to 1. On the other hand, if, in response to an operator-generated command to lift the fork carriage assembly 60, the piston/cylinder unit 70 is capable of lifting the fork carriage assembly 60 above the second reference height plus a second reset height, as indicated by signals generated by the encoder 702, the controller 400 resets the value in the lockout memory location to 0, see steps 814 and 816. Thereafter, the controller 400 will allow the valve 600 to be energized such that it can be opened to allow controlled descent of the fork carriage assembly 60. The second reset height may have a value from about 0.25 inch to about 4 inches.
If the controller 400 determines during step 802 that the value in the second lockout memory location is 1, the controller 400 continuously monitors the height of the fork carriage assembly 60, via signals generated by the encoder 702, to see if the fork carriage assembly 60 moves above the second reference height plus the second reset height, see step 814.
Referring to
The second manifold 190 comprises in the illustrated embodiment an electro-proportional valve 192, which controls the rate at which pressurized fluid is provided to the valve 600. One such valve 192 is commercially available from HydraForce Inc. under the product designation “TS10-36.” Also provided is an electronically controlled pressure release valve 194. As illustrated in
It is further contemplated that the controller 400 may turn off power to the valve 300 if the rate of descent of the platform assembly 30 exceeds a predefined, fixed threshold speed, such as 120 feet/minute. It is still further contemplated that the controller 400 may turn off power to the valve 600 if the rate of unintended descent of the fork carriage assembly 60 exceeds a predefined, fixed threshold speed, such as 120 feet/minute. In both embodiments, the controller 400 will not allow either the platform assembly 30 or the fork carriage assembly 60 to move downwardly at a speed in excess of the threshold speed. The predefined, fixed threshold speed may be defined by the manufacturer during production of the truck.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3263574 | Tennis | Aug 1966 | A |
3709331 | Smith, Jr. | Jan 1973 | A |
3843003 | Frank | Oct 1974 | A |
3947744 | Grace et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4130183 | Tjörnemark | Dec 1978 | A |
4144946 | Melocik | Mar 1979 | A |
4204460 | Andersen et al. | May 1980 | A |
4354568 | Griesenbrock | Oct 1982 | A |
4426683 | Kissell | Jan 1984 | A |
4467894 | Sinclair | Aug 1984 | A |
4485623 | Chichester et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4499541 | Yuki et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4509127 | Yuki et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4511974 | Nakane et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4517645 | Yuki et al. | May 1985 | A |
4548296 | Hasegawa | Oct 1985 | A |
4552250 | Luebrecht | Nov 1985 | A |
4592449 | Sakata et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4665698 | Trusock | May 1987 | A |
4716990 | Takeuchi | Jan 1988 | A |
4742468 | Ohashi et al. | May 1988 | A |
4817760 | Yamamura | Apr 1989 | A |
4826474 | Holmes | May 1989 | A |
4869635 | Krahn | Sep 1989 | A |
4942529 | Avitan et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943756 | Conley, III et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5011363 | Conley, III et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022496 | Klopfleisch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5044472 | Dammeyer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5238086 | Aoki et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5266115 | Taccon et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5329441 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341695 | Avitan | Aug 1994 | A |
5462136 | Schoemaker et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5526673 | Avitan | Jun 1996 | A |
5647457 | Wegdam et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649422 | Baginski et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652486 | Mueller et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657834 | Plaugher et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666295 | Bruns | Sep 1997 | A |
5680762 | Reid | Oct 1997 | A |
5687081 | Wellman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5712618 | McKenna | Jan 1998 | A |
5717588 | Yamane et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733095 | Palmer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5816366 | Briday et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5890563 | Avitan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5969302 | Nishizawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6009357 | Wellman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6125970 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135694 | Trego et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6269913 | Kollmannsberger | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6439102 | Matsuzaki et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6533076 | Haverfield et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557586 | Lockyer et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611746 | Nagai | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6785597 | Farber et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20030159576 | Schoonmaker et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167114 | Chen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040079076 | Lazaro | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3414793 | Oct 1984 | DE |
4017947 | Dec 1991 | DE |
19933559 | Jan 2001 | DE |
100 10 670 | Sep 2001 | DE |
10030059 | Dec 2001 | DE |
10110700 | Sep 2002 | DE |
0 439 436 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0439436 | Jul 1991 | EP |
2 196 447 | Apr 1988 | GB |
1168550 | Jul 1989 | JP |
03-098997 | Apr 1991 | JP |
5131299 | May 1993 | JP |
72337856 | Sep 1995 | JP |
8156674 | Jun 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060060409 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |