The present invention pertains generally to smoke analyzers. More particularly, the present invention pertains to optical devices that are used for smoke analyzers. The present invention is particularly, but not exclusively useful as an optical unit for generating signals to analyze smoke, wherein the signals are based on polarization, wavelength and scattering angle considerations.
Particles of different sizes and shapes (i.e. different materials) can become suspended in air for any of several different reasons. Tiny, condensed water droplets or ice crystals that become suspended in the atmosphere as clouds are a good example of this phenomenon. Clouds of particles, other than water, that may become suspended in air, such as dust and smoke, are also well known examples of the phenomenon. Unfortunately, smoke can be generated with many types of materials that will most likely cause undesirable consequences. In any event, and particularly in the case of smoke, it may be desirable or necessary to identify the type(s) of particles that constitute the smoke cloud.
Physically, it is well known that different types of particles, when suspended in air as a cloud, will affect light differently. In particular, it is known that particles in a cloud will scatter the light that is incident on the cloud and, depending on the nature of the particles in the cloud, the incident light will be scattered in a predictable and detectable manner. Importantly, the measurable characteristics of the scattered light depend on at least three significant factors. For one, if the incident light is polarized, when it is incident on particles in a cloud the light may change its polarization. If so, the polarization of the scattered light will be different from that of the incident light. For another, the wavelength (λ) of the incident light that interacts with the particles in the cloud will determine the extent of scattering. Further, detection of the scattered light will be influenced by where the detector is located relative to the beam path of the incident light (i.e. a scattering angle (θ)). In summary, the detection of a signal that is generated when light is scattered by a smoke cloud is dependent on the polarization of the incident light, the wavelength (λ) of the incident light, and the scattering angle (θ) where the detector happens to be located.
For purposes of the present invention, the above factors are important because different smoke and dust particles will scatter a same incident light beam differently. Further, it can be shown that relatively benign particles, though detectably different, have characteristically similar responses. Accordingly, as a group, they can be differentiated from the group of responses that are characteristically different and are typical of potentially hazardous or toxic particles (e.g. petrochemicals).
In light of the above, it is an object of the present invention to provide an optical unit for a smoke analyzer system that evaluates signals received from light scattered by a smoke cloud to determine whether the smoke includes particularly hazardous or toxic materials. Another object of the present invention is to provide an optical unit for a smoke analyzer system that generates signals for evaluation, wherein the signals are based on polarization, wavelength and scattering angle considerations. Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an optical unit for a smoke analyzer that is easy to use, is simple to manufacture and is comparatively cost effective.
A system for analyzing smoke includes a plurality of optical units, wherein each unit includes an optical emitter (E) and a pair of detectors. Each emitter is computer controlled to alternately direct a beam of horizontally polarized light (λH), or a beam of vertically polarized light (λV) along a beam path through a smoke cloud. Further, the emitters of the different optical units are controlled by the computer for sequential operation.
In addition to its emitter, each optical unit includes a horizontally polarized detector (DH) and a vertically polarized detector (DV). Both detectors are positioned at different locations having a same distance and a same scattering angle (θ) relative to the beam path. Preferably, the detectors are coplanar with the emitter and are therefore on directly opposite sides of the beam path. In operation, the horizontally polarized detector (DH) generates a signal SHH in response to λH, and it generates a signal SVH in response to λV. Similarly, the vertically polarized detector (DV) generates a signal SHV in response to λH, and it generates a signal SVV in response to λV.
For a preferred embodiment of the present invention, three coplanar optical units are used. Thus, respective emitters (E1, E2 and E3) are positioned on a circumference of a circle, with a separation arc length of 4θ between adjacent emitters. Within this arrangement, the emitter (E1) of a first optical unit generates λH and λV having a same first wavelength (λ), the emitter (E2) of a second optical unit generates λ′H and λ′V having a same second wavelength (λ′), and the emitter (E3) of a third unit generates λ″H and λ″V having a same third wavelength (λ″). Importantly, each emitter is sequentially and individually activated by the computer for a predetermined time interval to simultaneously generate response signals (S) in all detectors of the system.
The computer is also used for evaluating all of the response signals “S” for an analysis of the smoke. More specifically, this task is accomplished by computing a polarization ratio ρ(θ): wherein
ρ(θ)=σHH(θ)/σVV(θ)
with σHH(θ) and σVV(θ) each being a differential mass scattering cross section for horizontally polarized light and for vertically polarized light, respectively. In particular, for the present invention, the polarization ratio, ρ(θ), is used to identify smoke from a petrochemical (hydrocarbon) source.
In addition to the optical units mentioned above, the system of the present invention also includes filters for minimizing noise in the response signals. One filter is for removing white noise from the response signals (S), and the other is for operationally tracking the emitters. Specifically, a pre-filter is connected to each of detectors to filter a substantially d.c. component (white noise) from the outputs of the respective detectors. Additionally, the system has an oscillator that is controlled by the computer and is connected to each of the emitters. As used for the present invention, the oscillator establishes a blink rate (e.g. 3 Hz) for the transmission of light beams (e.g. λH and λV) from the respective emitters. Also, a synchronous demodulator is connected directly to the oscillator, and in series with the prefilter, for tracking the blink rate of the emitter during generation of the response signals S.
The novel features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, both as to its structure and its operation, will be best understood from the accompanying drawings, taken in conjunction with the accompanying description, in which similar reference characters refer to similar parts, and in which:
Referring initially to
In detail, each of the emitters E1, E2 and E3 includes two light emitting diodes (LEDs) that are specifically interrelated to each other. Importantly, the laser light beams 16 that are emitted from the LEDs of a respective emitter E1, E2 and E3 have a same wavelength (λ). They have, however, a different polarization. Specifically, the emitter E1 will alternately transmit a horizontally polarized light beam 16 of wavelength λH, and a vertically polarized light beam 16 of wavelength λV. Similarly, the emitter E2 will transmit light beams 16 of wavelengths λ′H and λ′V, while the emitter E3 will transmit light beams 16 of wavelengths λ″H and λ″V. Preferably, λ is substantially red light, λ′ is substantially green light, and λ″ is substantially blue light. As envisioned for the present invention, the transmission of light beams 16 from the respective emitters E1, E2 and E3 is controlled by the computer 12 through a concerted action of the sequencer 14 and the oscillator 26 to create signals S for use by computer 12 for generating an output 28.
Within the system 10, the operational positioning and orientation of the emitters E1, E2 and E3, relative to the detectors DH, DV, D′H, D′V, D″H, and D″V will perhaps be best appreciated with reference to the optical unit shown in
A preferred layout of three optical units 30 for the system 10 is presented in
By cross referencing
In the operation of the system 10, the computer 12 uses the sequencer 14 to sequentially activate the LEDs of emitters E1, E2 and E3. In concert with its operation of the sequencer 14, computer 12 also uses the oscillator 26 to establish a so-called “blink rate” for the transmission of light beams 16 from the emitters E1, E2 and E3. Accordingly, a sequence of light beams 16 having wavelengths and polarizations λH, λV, λ′H, λ′V, λ″H, and λ″V are sequentially transmitted through the smoke cloud 20, at the established “blink rate”. Consequently, for each sequence of light beams 16, all of the signals S shown in
An important aspect of the system 10 is the combined use of the pre-filter 22 and the tracking filter 24. In detail, the pre-filter 22 is used to eliminate the substantially d.c. component of background signals from the signals S. On the other hand, the tracking filter 24 is driven at the established “blink rate” to effectively isolate the received signals S. The isolated signals S can then be identified to correspond with times when a light beam 16 is being transmitted from an emitter E.
In accordance with the operation of system 10, after they have been generated and filtered, all of the signals S (see
ρ(θ)=σHH(θ)/σVV(θ)
wherein σHH(θ) and σVV(θ) are, respectively, a differential mass scattering cross section for horizontally polarized light, and a differential mass scattering cross section for vertically polarized light. As used by the system 10 of the present invention, the polarization ratio, ρ(θ), can then help identify smoke from a petrochemical (hydrocarbon) source. In particular, a succession of these normalization ratios are calculated and compared with empirical data to classify the origin of the smoke cloud 20. As shown in
While the particular Electro/Optical Smoke Analyzer as herein shown and disclosed in detail is fully capable of obtaining the objects and providing the advantages herein before stated, it is to be understood that it is merely illustrative of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention and that no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown other than as described in the appended claims.