The present invention relates generally to electrophoretic displays. More specifically, an improved driving scheme for an electrophoretic display is disclosed.
The electrophoretic display (EPD) is a non-emissive device based on the electrophoresis phenomenon of charged pigment particles suspended in a solvent. It was first proposed in 1969. The display usually comprises two plates with electrodes placed opposing each other, separated by using spacers. One of the electrodes is usually transparent. A suspension composed of a colored solvent and charged pigment particles is enclosed between the two plates. When a voltage difference is imposed between the two electrodes, the pigment particles migrate to one side and then either the color of the pigment or the color of the solvent can be seen according to the polarity of the voltage difference.
There are several different types of EPDs. In the partition type of EPD (see M. A. Hopper and V. Novotny, IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev., Vol. ED 26, No. 8, pp. 1148-1152 (1979)), there are partitions between the two electrodes for dividing the space into smaller cells in order to prevent undesired movement of particles such as sedimentation. The microcapsule type EPD (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,961,804 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,026) has a substantially two dimensional arrangement of microcapsules each having therein an electrophoretic composition of a dielectric solvent and a suspension of charged pigment particles that visually contrast with the solvent. Another type of EPD (see U.S. Pat. No. 3,612,758) has electrophoretic cells that are formed from parallel line reservoirs. The channel-like electrophoretic cells are covered with, and in electrical contact with, transparent conductors. A layer of transparent glass from which side the panel is viewed overlies the transparent conductors. Yet another type of EPD comprises closed cells formed from microcups of well-defined shape, size and aspect ratio and filled with charged pigment particles dispersed in a dielectric solvent, as disclosed in co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 09/518,488, filed on Mar. 3, 2000.
One problem associated with these EPDs is reverse bias. A reverse bias condition could occur when the bias voltage on a particular cell changes rapidly by a large increment or decrement and in conjunction with the presence of a stored charge resulting from the inherent capacitance of the materials and structures of the EPD. The reverse bias condition affects display quality by causing charged pigment particles in affected cells to migrate away from the position to which they have been driven. The following description along with FIG.
Suppose drive voltage generator 116 applies a square wave Vin to the upper electrode 112 and the lower electrode 114. The waveform of the voltage applied across the electrophoretic dispersion layer 102, Ved, has overshooting and undershooting portions as shown in
One solution to the aforementioned reverse bias problem has been disclosed by Hideyuki Kawai in application U.S. Ser. No. 10/224,543, filed Aug. 20, 2002, US patent publication 20030067666, published Apr. 10, 2003. The solution attempts to address the undershooting phenomenon by applying an input biasing voltage that has a smooth waveform and meets certain time constant requirements. However, this solution is difficult and costly to implement. Therefore, there is a need for an improved driving scheme for an EPD.
The present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, or a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network wherein program instructions are sent over optical or electronic communication links. The order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.
A detailed description of one or more preferred embodiments of the invention is provided below with drawing figures that illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention. While the invention is described in connection with such embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to any embodiment. On the contrary, the scope of the invention is limited only by the appended claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. For the purpose of example, numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the present invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
The whole content of each document referred to in this application is incorporated by reference into this application in its entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
A. Overview of the Electrical Connectivity Between the Drive Voltage Generator and the EPD
In an active matrix implementation of the EPD 100 as shown in
In addition, the pixel electrode 320 is connected to the drain terminal of a transistor 326, which is configured to control the application of biasing voltages to the pixel electrode 320. In one alternative embodiment, a switching component other than a transistor, such as a diode, is used in place of the transistor 326. The gate terminal of transistor 326 is connected to a gate line 328, or G 328. The source terminal of the transistor 326 is connected to a source line 334, or S 334. As shown in
Alternatively, in a direct drive implementation of the EPD 100,
B. Overview of the Drive Voltage Generator
One example process for the drive voltage generator 116 to drive display data to the EPD 100 involves a number of different control signals. For example, to transfer a certain level of voltage to the source lines, control signal 524 and control signal 526 are involved. Specifically, the control signal 524 enables the data register 504 to store the display data that are on a data line 522. Then, after the control signal 526 reaches a certain state, such as the falling edge of the signal, the data latch 506 transfers a portion of the stored display data to the drivers, such as the source driver 508. Based on certain bits in the display data, one embodiment of the source driver 508 transfers one of the multiple-level voltages 520 from the power supply 500 to the source lines. In addition, depending on the state of the driving cycle, the control signal 528 may cause the gate driver 512 to turn off the transistors on its gate lines, such as transistor 326 and transistor 346 on the gate line 328.
C. Use of Switches to Mitigate Effect of Reverse Bias
1. Active Matrix Implementation
The display states of the pixels shown in the array portion 300 of
Under the bipolar approach, a driving biasing voltage of a first polarity drives the cells to a first display state, and a second biasing voltage of the opposite polarity drives those cells to a second state. For example, a positive bias voltage may be applied to the cells so that a state in which the charged pigment particles are at or near the viewing surface of the display is reached. A negative bias voltage may also be applied to those cells so that the charged pigment particles are in a position at or near the non-viewing side of the display.
a. Uni-Polar Approach
Using the cells 302 and 304 shown in
During the second driving phase 602, selected cells are driven to the white state. In one example case, the color of the dielectric solvent in the dispersion layer 342 is driven to the white state. The common line and source line 334 are held at ground potential and the source line 336 at a positive voltage level. The gate driver 512 applies a high voltage to the gate line 328 and turns on the transistor 346 to transfer the voltage on the source line 336 to the drain of the transistor 346 and to the pixel electrode 340. As a result, the white charged pigment particles in the dispersion layer 342 are driven to the position at or near the common electrode 344 on the viewing side of the display. Then the gate driver 512 applies a low voltage to the gate line 328 and in effect turns off the transistor 346. After a time period 605, the source line 336 is set to 0 volt. This also allows the charge on the cell 304 to be slowly discharged to 0 volt through the off transistor. The duration of the switch off time 604 and 606 depends on the characteristics of the electrophoretic dispersion, dielectric material, and the thickness of each layer.
b. Bipolar Approach
Using the cell 302 as shown in
Similar to the uni-polar approach discussions above, one embodiment of the drive voltage generator 116 turns off the transistors 326 and 346 after all the cells are driven to the designated states. After time duration 702, all source lines are then set to ground (0 volt). The charge at each cell is then slowly discharged through the high impedance of the off transistor. The switch off duration of the transistor switch off time 704 depends on the characteristics of the electrophoretic dispersion, dielectric material, and the thickness of each layer.
2. Direct Drive Implementation
As an illustration, the direct drive implementation of the EPD 100 described in this section involves white positively charged pigment particles and either black or some other contrasting background color dielectric solvent. Also, as shown in
a. Uni-Polar Approach
After the segments reach their desired color states, the segment switch 544, the common switch 546, and the background switch 548 are turned off. After a time period 803, the drivers, such as 538, 540, and 542, set 0 volt on the lines. This allows the charges on the segments and the background to be slowly discharged to 0 volt through the high impedance of the off switches.
During phase 802, the common remains at 0 volt. The segment electrode of the segment 426 is driven by the segment line 410 with 0 volt and with the segment switch 544 turned on. The background electrode of the background 432 is driven by the background line 416 with also 0 volt and with the background switch 548 turned on. During this phase of the driving cycle, both the segment 426 and the background 432 show the color of the solvent (background), or black in this example. On the other hand, the segment line 414 is driven to a positive voltage. The segment 430 instead shows the color of the particles, or white in this example. After the segments reach their desired color states, the segment switch 544, the common switch 546, and the background switch 548 are turned off. After a time period 805, the drivers, such as 538, 540, and 542, set 0 volt on the lines. This allows the charges on the segments and the background to be slowly discharged to 0 volt through the high impedance of the off switches. The switch off duration of the transistor switch off time 804 and 806 depends on the characteristics of the electrophoretic dispersion, dielectric material, and the thickness of each layer.
b. Bi-Polar Approach
c. Pre-Drive Approach
In a typical EPD, the charge property of the particles relates to the field strength that the particles experience. For instance, after the particles are under a strong field for a period of time, the reverse bias effect is greatly reduced. Due to the capacitance characteristics of an EPD cell, the field strength is the strongest during the transition from a positive driving voltage to a negative driving voltage or vice versa. In
A plurality of pre-drive driving approaches for EPDs are now described with reference to
To provide background,
In
According to
The reverse bias phenomenon is caused by the capacitor charge holding characteristics of the insulating layer and the sealing layer. At any bias voltage transition, these layers, functioning as a capacitor, will not charge or discharge instantly. Without a special driving waveform design, a reverse polarity bias voltage will apply to the dispersion layer and cause particles migrate to the opposite direction of the desired state.
A similar degradation of the quality may also be observed with a black pixel, according to
To resolve the reverse bias issue, according to one embodiment, driving Phase A is separated into two phases. The first phase is called the pre-driving phase, and the second phase is called the driving phase. The voltage amplitude and duration of the pre-driving phase are higher and longer, respectively, than the amplitude and duration of the driving phase, to overcome the reverse bias effect. Otherwise, the reverse bias effect will be present as illustrated in
The voltage amplitudes and durations of the two phases may be optimized, together or individually, to overcome the reverse bias effect.
In Scheme I as shown in
In Scheme II as shown in
The voltage and duration of each phase of the driving schemes may be adjusted, according to specific display and driver requirements, based on the pre-drive mechanisms disclosed above.
D. Example Systems and Applications
Numerous applications utilize the illustrated system 900 in one form or another. Some examples include, without limitation, electronic books, personal digital assistants, mobile computers, mobile phones, digital cameras, electronic price tags, digital clocks, smart cards, and electronic papers.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the process and apparatus of the improved driving scheme for an electrophoretic display. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
This application claims domestic priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 as a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/973,810, filed Oct. 25, 2004, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated into this application by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3612758 | Evans et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
4143947 | Aftergut et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4259694 | Liao | Mar 1981 | A |
4443108 | Webster | Apr 1984 | A |
4972099 | Amano et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5266937 | DiSanto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5272477 | Tashima et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5754584 | Durrant et al. | May 1998 | A |
5831697 | Evanicky et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5923315 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961804 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6005890 | Clow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019284 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045756 | Carr et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069971 | Kanno et al. | May 2000 | A |
6111248 | Melendez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6154309 | Otani et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6335718 | Hong et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6532008 | Guralnick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6639580 | Kishi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657612 | Machida et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671081 | Kawai | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674561 | Ohnishi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686953 | Holmes | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6774883 | Muhlemann | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6796698 | Sommers et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6885495 | Liang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902115 | Graf et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6903716 | Kawabe et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914713 | Chung et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930818 | Liang et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6932269 | Sueyoshi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950220 | Abramson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6970155 | Cabrera | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995550 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7046228 | Liang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7177066 | Chung et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7242514 | Chung et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7349146 | Douglass et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7504050 | Weng et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7626444 | Clewett et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7701436 | Miyasaka | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7710376 | Edo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733311 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7800580 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7839381 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7952558 | Yang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7999787 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8035611 | Sakamoto | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044927 | Inoue | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8054253 | Yoo | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20020021483 | Katase | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033792 | Inoue | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030011868 | Zehner et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035885 | Zang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067666 | Kawai | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095090 | Ham | May 2003 | A1 |
20030137521 | Zehner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030227451 | Chang | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040112966 | Pangaud | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120024 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040219306 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227746 | Shih | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246562 | Chung et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263450 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001812 | Amundson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050162377 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163940 | Liang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179642 | Wilcox et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185003 | Dedene et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210405 | Ernst et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219184 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060049263 | Ou et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060050361 | Johnson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060132426 | Johnson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139305 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139309 | Miyasaka | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060164405 | Zhou | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187186 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192751 | Miyasaka et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209055 | Wakita | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238488 | Nihei et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262147 | Kimpe et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070035510 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046621 | Suwabe et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070046625 | Yee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070052668 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070032 | Chung et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080926 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070080928 | Ishii et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091117 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103427 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109274 | Reynolds | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132687 | Johnson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146306 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159682 | Takanak et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182402 | Kojima | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188439 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200874 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070247417 | Miyazaki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262949 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276615 | Cao et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070296690 | Nagasaki | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080150886 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080211833 | Inoue | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080303780 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090096745 | Sprague et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090267970 | Wong et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100134538 | Sprague et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100194733 | Lin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100194789 | Lin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238203 | Stroemer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283804 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295880 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110096104 | Sprague et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110175875 | Lin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175945 | Lin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110216104 | Chan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110298776 | Lin | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120120122 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120274671 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120320017 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03282691 | Dec 1991 | JP |
2002-014654 | Jan 2002 | JP |
1020090129191 | Dec 2009 | KR |
WO 0167170 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 2005004099 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005004099 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005031688 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034076 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005031688 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005034076 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2009049204 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2010132272 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Allen, K. (Oct. 2003). Electrophoretics Fulfilled. Emerging Displays Review: Emerging Display Technologies, Monthly Report—Oct. 2003, 9-14. |
Bardsley, J.N. & Pinnel, M.R. (Nov. 2004) Microcup™ Electrophoretic Displays. USDC Flexible Display Report, 3.1.2. pp. 3-12-3-16. |
Chaug, Y.S., Haubrich, J.E., Sereda, M. and Liang, R.C. (Apr. 2004). Roll-to-Roll Processes for the Manufacturing of Patterned Conductive Electrodes on Flexible Substrates. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 814, I9.6.1. |
Chen, S.M. (Jul. 2003) The Applications for the Revolutionary Electronic Paper Technology. OPTO News & Letters, 102, 37-41. (in Chinese). |
Chen, S.M. (May 2003) The New Applications and the Dynamics of Companies. TRI. 1-10. (In Chinese). |
Chung, J., Hou, J., Wang, W., Chu, L.Y., Yao, W., & Liang, R.C. (Dec. 2003). Microcup® Electrophoretic Displays, Grayscale and Color Rendition. IDW, AMD2/EP1-2, 243-246. |
Ho, Andrew. (Nov. 2006) Embedding e-Paper in Smart Cards, Pricing Labels & Indicators. Presentation conducted at Smart Paper Conference, Nov. 15-16, 2006, Atlanta, GA. |
Ho, Candice. (Feb. 1, 2005) Microcup® Electronic Paper Device and Applicaiton. Presentation conducted at USDC 4th Annual Flexible Displays & Microelectronics Conference 2005. |
Ho, C.,& Liang, R.C. (Dec. 2003). Microcup® Electronic Paper by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. Presentation conducted at FEG, Nei-Li, Taiwan. |
Hopper, & Novotny, (1979) An Electrophoretic Display, Its Properties, Model and Addressing. IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev., ED 26, No. 8, pp. 1148-1152. |
Hou, J., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Weng, X., Li, H. and Pereira, C. (May 2004). Reliability and Performance of Flexible Electrophoretic Displays by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. SID Digest, 32.3, 1066-1069. |
Howard, Robert E., (Feb. 2004) Better Displays with Organic Films. Scientific American, pp. 76-81. |
Lee, H., & Liang, R.C. (Jun. 2003) SiPix Microcup® Electronic Paper—An Introduction. Advanced Display, Issue 37, 4-9 (in Chinese). |
Liang, R.C. (Feb. 2003) Microcup® Electrophoretic and Liquid Crystal Displays by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. Presentation conducted at the Flexible Microelectronics & Displays Conference of U.S. Display Consortium, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. |
Liang, R.C. (Apr. 2004). Microcup Electronic Paper by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Process. Presentation at the Flexible Displays & Electronics 2004 of Intertech, San Fransisco, California, USA. |
Liang, R.C. (Oct. 2004) Flexible and Roll-able Display/Electronic Paper—A Technology Overview. Paper presented at the METS 2004 Conference in Taipie, Taiwan. |
Liang, R.C., (Feb. 2005) Flexible and Roll-able Displays/Electronic Paper—A Brief Technology Overview. Flexible Display Forum, 2005, Taiwan. |
Liang, R.C., Hou, J., Chung, J., Wang, X., Pereira, C., & Chen, Y. (2003). Microcup® Active and Passive Matrix Electrophoretic Displays by a Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. SID Digest, 20.1. |
Liang, R.C., Hou, J., & Zang, H.M. (Dec. 2002) Microcup Electrophoretic Displays by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. IDW , EP2-2, 1337-1340. |
Liang, R.C., Hou, J., Zang, H.M., & Chung, J. (Feb. 2003). Passive Matrix Microcup® Electrophoretic Displays. Paper presented at the IDMC, Taipei, Taiwan. |
Liang, R.C., Hou, J., Zang, H.M., Chung, J., & Tseng, S. (2003). Microcup® Displays : Electronic Paper by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. Journal of the SID, 11(4), 621-628. |
Liang, R.C., Zang, H.M., Wang, X., Chung, J. & Lee, H., (Jun./Jul. 2004) << Format Flexible Microcup® Electronic Paper by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Process >>, Presentation conducted at the 14th FPD Manufacturing Technology EXPO & Conference. |
Liang, R.C., & Tseng, S. (Feb. 2003). Microcup® LCD, A New Type of Dispersed LCD by a Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Process. Paper presented at the IDMC, Taipei, Taiwan. |
Nikkei Microdevices. (Dec. 2002) Newly-Developed Color Electronic Paper Promises—Unbeatable Production Efficiency. Nikkei Microdevices, 3. (in Japanese, with English translation). |
Wang, X., Kiluk, S., Chang, C., & Liang, R.C. (Feb. 2004). Microcup® Electronic Paper and the Converting Processes. ASID, 10.1.2-26, 396-399, Nanjing, China. |
Wang, X., Kiluk, S., Chang, C., & Liang, R.C., (Jun. 2004) Microcup® Electronic Paper and the Converting Processes. Advanced Display, Issue 43, 48-51. |
Wang, X., Li, P., Sodhi, D., Xu, T. and Bruner, S. et al., (Feb. 2006) Inkjet Fabrication of Multi-Color Microcup® Electrophorectic Display. The Flexible Microelectronics & Displays Conference of U.S. Display Consortium. |
Wang, X., Zang, HM., and Li, P. (Jun. 2006) Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Process for Full Color Electrophoretic Film. SID Digest, pp. 1587-1589. |
Zang, H.M. (Feb. 2004). Microcup Electronic Paper. Presentation conducted at the Displays & Microelectronics Conference of U.S. Display Consortium, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. |
Zang, H.M. (Oct. 2003). Microcup® Electronic Paper by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. Presentation conducted at the Advisory Board Meeting, Bowling Green State University, Ohio, USA. |
Zang, H.M. & Hou, Jack, (Feb. 2005) Flexible Microcup® EPD by RTR Process. Presentation conducted at 2nd Annual Paper-Like Displays Conference, Feb. 9-11, 2005, St. Pete Beach, Florida. |
Zang, H.M., & Liang, R.C. (2003) Microcup Electronic Paper by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. The Spectrum, 16(2), 16-21. |
Zang, H.M, Hwang, J.J., Gu, H., Hou, J., Weng, X., Chen, Y., et al. (Jan. 2004). Threshold and Grayscale Stability of Microcup® Electronic Paper. Proceeding of SPIE—IS&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE vol. 5289, 102-108. |
Zang, HM., Wang, W., Sun, C., Gu, H., and Chen, Y. (May 2006) Monochrome and Area Color Microcup® EPDs by Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing Processes. ICIS ' 06 International Congress of Imaging Science Final Program and Proceedings, pp. 362-365. |
Kishi, et al., Development of In-plane EPD, SID 2000 Digest, pp. 24-27. |
Swanson, et al., High Performance EPDs, SID 2000 Digest, pp. 29-31. |
Kao, WC., Ye, JA., Chu, MI., and Su, CY. (Feb. 2009) Image Quality Improvement for Electrophoretic Displays by Combining Contrast Enhancement and Halftoning Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2009, vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 15-19. |
Kao, WC., (Feb. 2009) Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Dispaly. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2009, vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 1-5. |
Kao, WC., Ye, JA., and Lin, C. (Jan. 2009) Image Quality Improvement for Electrophoretic Displays by Combining Contrast Enhancement and Halftoning Techniques. ICCE 2009 Digest of Technical Papers, 11.2-2, 2 pgs. |
Kao, WC., Ye, JA., Lin, FS., Lin, C., and Sprague, R. (Jan. 2009) Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Display with 16 Gray Levels. ICCE 2009 Digest of Technical Papers, 10.2-2, 2 pgs. |
Kao, WC., Fang, CY., Chen, YY., Shen, MH., and Wong, J. (Jan. 2008) Integrating Flexible Electrophoretic Display and One-Time Password Generator in Smart Cards. ICCE 2008 Digest of Technical Papers, P4-3. (Int'l Conference on Consumer Electronics, Jan. 9-13, 2008), 2 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,197, filed Mar. 11, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,330, filed May 3, 1010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,513, filed May 5, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/695,830, filed Jan. 28, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/695,817, filed Jan. 28, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/255,028, filed Oct. 26, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/295,628, filed Jan. 15, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/296,832, filed Jan. 20, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/311,693, filed Mar. 8, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/351,764, filed Jun. 4, 2010. |
Korean Patent Office, “International Search Report & Written Opinion”, dated Dec. 7, 2010, application No. PCT/US2010/033906, 9 pages. |
Current Claims for Korean application No. PCT/US2010/033906, 1 page, dated May 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,238, filed Jun. 3, 2008, Office Action, Nov. 9, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,197, filed Mar. 11, 2008, Wang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/155,513, filed May 5, 2008, Sprague et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/004,763, filed Jan. 11, 2011, Lin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/152,140, filed Jun. 2, 2011, Lin. |
Sprague, R.A. “Active Matrix Displays for e-Readers Using Microcup Electrophoretics”. Presentation conducted at SID 2011, 49 International Symposium Seminar and Exhibition, dated May 18, 2011, 20 pages. |
Sprague, R.A. (May 18, 2011) Active Matrix Displays for e-Readers Using Microcup Electrophoretics. Presentation conducted at SID 2011, 49 Int'l Symposium, Seminar and Exhibition, May 15-May 20, 2011, Los Angeles Convention Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/772,330, filed May 3, 2010, Office Action, Apr. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,238, filed Jun. 3, 2008, Final Office Action, May 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,197, filed Mar. 11, 2008, Notice of Allowance, May 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/289,403, filed Nov. 4, 2011, Lin et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070070032 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10973810 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11607757 | US |