Electrophoretic displays

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10331005
  • Patent Number
    10,331,005
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 4, 2017
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2019
    6 years ago
Abstract
A variable transmission display comprises an electrophoretic medium having electrically charged particles dispersed in a fluid, the electrophoretic medium being capable of assuming a light-transmissive state and a substantially non-light-transmissive state; a light-transmissive first electrode disposed adjacent one side of the electrophoretic medium; light-transmissive second electrodes disposed adjacent the other side of the electrophoretic medium; and voltage means for varying the potential each of the second electrodes independently of one another.
Description
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

This invention relates to electrophoretic displays, and methods for operating such displays. More specifically, this invention relates to electrophoretic displays in which solid particles and a suspending fluid are held within a cavity.


Electrophoretic displays have been the subject of intense research and development for a number of years. Such displays use a display medium comprising a plurality of electrically charged particles suspended in a fluid. Electrodes are provided adjacent the display medium so that the charged particles can be moved through the fluid by applying an electric field to the medium. In one type of such electrophoretic display, the medium comprises a single type of particle having one optical characteristic in a fluid which has a different optical characteristic. In a second type of such electrophoretic display, the medium contains two different types of particles differing in at least one optical characteristic and in electrophoretic mobility; the particles may or may not bear charges of opposite polarity. The optical characteristic which is varied is typically color visible to the human eye, but may, alternatively or in addition, be any one of more of reflectivity, retroreflectivity, luminescence, fluorescence, phosphorescence, or (in the case of displays intended for machine reading) color in the broader sense of meaning a difference in absorption or reflectance at non-visible wavelengths.


Electrophoretic displays can be divided into two main types, namely unencapsulated and encapsulated displays. In an unencapsulated electrophoretic display, the electrophoretic medium is present as a bulk liquid, typically in the form of a flat film of the liquid present between two parallel, spaced electrodes. Such unencapsulated displays typically have problems with their long-term image quality which have prevented their widespread usage. For example, particles that make up such electrophoretic displays tend to cluster and settle, resulting in inadequate service-life for these displays.


An encapsulated, electrophoretic display differs from an unencapsulated display in that the particle-containing fluid is not present as a bulk liquid but instead is confined within the walls of a large number of small capsules. Encapsulated displays typically do not suffer from the clustering and settling failure mode of traditional electrophoretic devices and provides further advantages, such as the ability to print or coat the display on a wide variety of flexible and rigid substrates.


For further details regarding encapsulated electrophoretic displays, the reader is referred to U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 5,961,804; 6,017,584; 6,067,185; 6,118,426; 6,120,588; 6,120,839; 6,124,851; 6,130,773; 6,130,774; 6,172,798; 6,177,921; 6,232,950; 6,249,271; 6,252,564; 6,262,706; 6,262,833; 6,300,932; 6,312,304; 6,312,971; 6,323,989; 6,327,072; 6,376,828; 6,377,387; 6,392,785; 6,392,786; 6,413,790; 6,422,687; 6,445,374; 6,445,489; 6,459,418; 6,473,072; 6,480,182; 6,498,114; 6,504,524; 6,506,438; 6,512,354; 6,515,649; 6,518,949; 6,521,489; 6,531,997; 6,535,197; 6,538,801; 6,545,291; and 6,580,545; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0019081; 2002/0021270; 2002/0053900; 2002/0060321; 2002/0063661; 2002/0063677; 2002/0090980; 2002/0106847; 2002/0113770; 2002/0130832; 2002/0131147; 2002/0145792; 2002/0171910; 2002/0180687; 2002/0180688; 2002/0185378; 2003/0011560; 2003/0011867; 2003/0011868; 2003/0020844; 2003/0025855; 2003/0034949; 2003/0038755; 2003/0053189; 2003/0076573; 2003/0096113; 2003/0102858; 2003/0132908; 2003/0137521; 2003/0137717; and 2003/0151702; and International Applications Publication Nos. WO 99/67678; WO 00/05704; WO 00/38000; WO 00/38001; WO 00/36560; WO 00/67110; WO 00/67327; WO 01/07961; and WO 01/08241. All of these patents and applications are in the name of, or assigned to, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) or E Ink Corporation.


Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that the walls surrounding the discrete microcapsules in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium could be replaced by a continuous phase, thus producing a so-called “polymer-dispersed” electrophoretic display in which the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discrete droplets of an electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of a polymeric material, and that the discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid within such a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display may be regarded as capsules or microcapsules even though no discrete capsule membrane is associated with each individual droplet; see for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,392,786, at column 6, lines 44-63. See also the aforementioned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0131147, and the corresponding International Application PCT/US02/06393 (Publication No. WO 02/075443). Accordingly, for purposes of the present application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic media are regarded as sub-species of encapsulated electrophoretic media.


A related type of electrophoretic display is a so-called “microcell electrophoretic display”, sometimes also called a “microcup” electrophoretic display. In a microcell electrophoretic display, the charged particles and the suspending fluid are not encapsulated within microcapsules but instead are retained within a plurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium (or substrate), typically a polymeric film. See, for example, International Applications Publication No. WO 02/01281, and published US Application No. 2002/0075556, both assigned to Sipix Imaging, Inc.


Hereinafter, the term “microcavity electrophoretic display” will be used to cover both encapsulated and microcell electrophoretic displays.


One of the problems with electrophoretic displays is the limited range of colors which each pixel of the display can produce. The prior art describes two main types of electrophoretic media. One type comprises a single type of electrically charged particle in a colored medium. This type of medium is only capable of producing two colors at each pixel; either the color of the particles or the color of the medium is seen. The second type of medium comprises two different types of electrically charged particles in an essentially uncolored medium; the two types of particles may differ in polarity of electric charge or have charges of the same polarity but differ in electrophoretic mobility. Again, this type of medium is only capable of producing two colors at each pixel, namely the colors of the two types of particles.


One approach to expanding the limited range of colors available from conventional electrophoretic displays is to place an array of colored filters over the pixels of the display. For example, consider the effect on a display comprising white particles in a black fluid of placing an array of color filters (say red, green and blue) over the individual pixels of the display. Moving the white particles adjacent the viewing surface of a pixel covered with a red filter would color that pixel red, whereas moving the white particles of the same pixel adjacent the rear surface of the display would render the pixel black. The main problem with this approach to generating color is that the brightness of the display is limited by the pixilation of the color filter. For example, if a red color is desired, the pixels covered by red filters are set to appear red, whereas the pixels covered by green and blue filters are set to appear dark, so that only a fraction of the display surface has the desired color while the remaining portion is dark, thus limiting the brightness of any color obtained. A reflective display that was capable of three optical states (black, white and color or black, white and transparent) would significant advantages in image quality, cost and ease of manufacture.


Conventional electrophoretic displays rely upon movement of electrically charged particles in an electric field under electrostatic forces; the particles move along the lines of force of the electric field. However, it is known that objects can be moved by dielectrophoretic forces, that is to say that dipoles induced in the objects by a non-uniform electric field cause the particles to move towards regions of higher field strength. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,346 to Batchelder which describes an apparatus for providing a dielectrophoretic display of visual information. In this apparatus, a “bubble” of a fluid is moved through a second, immiscible fluid in a stepwise manner by applying voltages to closely spaced electrodes, the bubble being visible against a visually contrasting background. Visual information is conveyed by the position of the bubble relative to the background. The patent suggests that a simple one-dimensional display of this type might represent the level of an analog signal by the position of the bubble. However, since the movement involved is that of a bubble against a contrasting background, such an apparatus does not appear capable of displaying an arbitrary image.


It has now been realized that using a microcavity electrophoretic medium in a dielectrophoretic display greatly simplifies the problem of generating the heterogeneous electric field required by such a display, since differences between the dielectric constant and/or conductivity between the suspending fluid and the material surrounding the suspending fluid (such as a polymeric binder in which the capsules are embedded, as described in many of the aforementioned E Ink and MIT patents and publications, or the substrate in which the cavities of a microcell electrophoretic display are formed) will result in a heterogeneous electric field which can be used to move the particles within the suspending fluid against the side walls of the cavities, thereby providing the display with a substantially transparent state.


It has further been realized that a microcavity electrophoretic medium allows for the provision of auxiliary electrodes which can be used to assist the movement of particles required to provide the display with a substantially transparent state.


Variable transmission windows represent a potentially important market for electrophoretic media. As the energy performance of buildings and vehicles becomes increasingly important, electrophoretic media can be used as coatings on windows (including skylights and sunroofs) to enable the proportion of incident radiation transmitted through the windows to be electronically controlled by varying the optical state of the media. Effective implementation of such “variable-transmissivity” (“VT”) technology in buildings is expected to provide (1) reduction of unwanted heating effects during hot weather, thus reducing the amount of energy needed for cooling, the size of air conditioning plants, and peak electricity demand; (2) increased use of natural daylight, thus reducing energy used for lighting and peak electricity demand; and (3) increased occupant comfort by increasing both thermal and visual comfort. Even greater benefits would be expected to accrue in an automobile, where the ratio of glazed surface to enclosed volume is significantly larger than in a typical building. Specifically, effective implementation of VT technology in automobiles is expected to provide not only the aforementioned benefits but also (1) increased motoring safety, (2) reduced glare, (3) enhanced mirror performance (by using an electro-optic coating on the mirror), and (4) increased ability to use heads-up displays. Other potential applications of VT technology include privacy glass and glare-guards in electronic devices.


In addition to the aforementioned advantages, variable transmission windows can be used to provide privacy. Conventional (invariable) glass windows, doors, and room partitions have the advantage of admitting natural light, but the disadvantage of not providing privacy when needed. Mechanical privacy devices such as shades, for example in the form of vertical blinds, take up space, are cumbersome to use, and are often unreliable. Privacy “veiling” can be achieved by increasing the reflection, absorption, and scattering of the glass, using mirrored, tinted or frosted glass respectively. The veiling effect increases with the ratio of the light that is reflected, absorbed, or scattered by the window to the light that is transmitted through the window. Only scatter screening provides a veiling effect that is independent on the illumination conditions in- and outside the window because scatter screening blurs the view through the window, whereas reflection or absorption veiling becomes ineffective when the illumination beyond the window is high compared to that surrounding an observer outside the window.


Frosted glass in doors, room partitions, and windows is frequently used not only to provide privacy but also to display information e.g. the name and opening hours of a business that occupies the premises whose privacy is protected by the frosted glass. Frosted glass is also frequently used for decorative purposes i.e. displaying decorative patterns. However, conventional frosted glass has two major disadvantages; the privacy screening cannot be switched off when not needed, and information on the glass cannot be changed easily and without high costs when necessary, for example when the tenant of a building changes.


Liquid crystal (LC) display technology can be used instead of frosted glass for ‘variable opacity’ privacy windows, and can also display information. However, LCD windows of any useful size are very costly, and high in power consumption.


Accordingly, variable transmission-windows using electrophoretic media have been proposed; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,327,511; 7,999,787; and 7,679,814. Such electrophoretic VT windows have the advantages of low cost per area, and require power only when switching, and offer potential for in situ deposition by spray coating. However, such windows can suffer from visible non-uniformities (mottle, streaks, or point defects)) that may make them less attractive than liquid crystal-based windows despite their reduced cost and power consumption. Achieving uniformity below visible threshold of non-uniformity in electrophoretic VT windows may erase some of the cost benefits of such windows over their liquid crystal based counterparts.


The present invention provides a variable transmission electrophoretic window (or other display) which renders non-uniformities in the electrophoretic medium less visible.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, this invention provides a dielectrophoretic display comprising:


a substrate having walls defining at least one cavity, the cavity having a viewing surface and a side wall inclined to the viewing surface;


a suspending fluid contained within the cavity;


a plurality of at least one type of particle suspended within the suspending fluid; and


means for applying to the fluid an electric field effective to cause dielectrophoretic movement of the particles to the side wall of the cavity.


This invention also provides a process for operating a dielectrophoretic display, the process comprising:


providing a substrate having walls defining at least one cavity, the cavity having a viewing surface and a side wall inclined to the viewing surface; a suspending fluid contained within the cavity; and a plurality of at least one type of particle suspended within the suspending fluid; and


applying to the fluid an electric field effective to cause dielectrophoretic movement of the particles to the side wall of the cavity.


In the dielectrophoretic display of the present invention, the suspending fluid may be substantially uncolored, and have suspended therein only a single type of particle.


At least some of the at least one type of particle may be electrically charged, and in one form of a display containing such electrically charged particles, the suspending fluid may have suspended therein a first type of particle having a first optical characteristic and a first electrophoretic mobility, and a second type of particle having a second optical characteristic different from the first optical characteristic and a second electrophoretic mobility different from the first electrophoretic mobility. The first and second electrophoretic mobilities may differ in sign, so that the first and second types of particles move in opposed directions in an electric field, and the suspending fluid may be substantially uncolored. This type of display may further comprise a backing member disposed on the opposed side of the cavity from the viewing surface, at least part of the backing member having a third optical characteristic different from the first and second optical characteristics. The backing member may comprise areas having third and fourth optical characteristics different from each other and from the first and second optical characteristics. In preferred forms of such a display, the backing member comprises areas having red, green and blue or yellow, cyan and magenta colors, and the first and second optical characteristics may comprise black and white colors.


In the dielectrophoretic display of the present invention, the cavity may have a non-circular cross-section, preferably a polygonal cross-section, as seen from the viewing surface. The at least one type of particle may be formed from an electrically conductive material, for example a metal, carbon black or a doped semiconductor.


As already indicated, in the dielectrophoretic display of the present invention, the substrate may comprises at least one capsule wall (typically a deformable wall) so that the dielectrophoretic display comprises at least one capsule. For reasons explained in the aforementioned 2003/0137717, the capsules are preferably arranged in a single layer. Alternatively, the substrate may comprise a continuous phase surrounding a plurality of discrete droplets of the suspending fluid having the at least one type of particle suspended therein (i.e., the display may be of the polymer-dispersed type), or may comprises a substantially rigid material having the at least one cavity formed therein, the substrate further comprising at least one cover member closing the at least one cavity, so that the display is of the microcell type.


In the process of the present invention, the electric field may be an alternating electric field. When the display is of the type in which at least some of the at least one type of particle are electrically charged, and the suspending fluid has suspended therein a first type of particle having a first optical characteristic and a first electrophoretic mobility, and a second type of particle having a second optical characteristic different from the first optical characteristic and a second electrophoretic mobility different from the first electrophoretic mobility, with the first and second electrophoretic mobilities differing in sign, so that the first and second types of particles move in opposed directions in an electric field, the process may further comprise:


applying an electric field of a first polarity to the cavity, thereby causing the first type of particles to approach the viewing surface and the cavity to display the first optical characteristic at the viewing surface; and


applying an electric field of a polarity opposite to the first polarity to the cavity, thereby causing the second type of particles to approach the viewing surface and the cavity to display the second optical characteristic at the viewing surface.


This invention also provides a dielectrophoretic display comprising:


a substrate having walls defining at least one cavity, the cavity having a viewing surface and a side wall inclined to the viewing surface;


a fluid contained within the cavity;


a plurality of at least one type of electrically charged particle within the fluid, the particles having a first optical characteristic;


a backing member disposed on the opposed side of the cavity from the viewing surface, at least part of the backing member having a second optical characteristic different from the first optical characteristics, the backing member being light-transmissive; and


means for applying to the substrate an electric field effective to cause dielectrophoretic movement of the particles to the side wall of the cavity.


In one form of such a dielectrophoretic display, the fluid is substantially uncolored, and has therein only a single type of particle. The cavity may have a non-circular (and preferably polygonal) cross-section as seen from the viewing surface. The single type of particle may be formed from an electrically conductive material, for example a metal or carbon black. Alternatively, the single type of particle may be formed from a doped semiconductor.


The substrate may comprise at least one capsule wall so that the dielectrophoretic display comprises at least one capsule. The display may comprise a plurality of capsules, the capsules being arranged in a single layer. Alternatively, the substrate may comprise a continuous phase surrounding a plurality of discrete droplets of the fluid having the particles therein. In another form of such a dielectrophoretic display, the substrate comprises a substantially rigid material having the at least one cavity formed therein, the substrate further comprising at least one cover member closing the at least one cavity.


The dielectrophoretic display may be arranged to have light projected on to a surface on the opposed side of the dielectrophoretic display from the viewing surface. The invention extends to a variable transmission window comprising a dielectrophoretic display of the invention.


This invention also provides a process for operating a dielectrophoretic display, the process comprising:


providing a substrate having walls defining at least one cavity, the cavity having a viewing surface and a side wall inclined to the viewing surface, a fluid contained within the cavity; and a plurality of at least one type of electrically charged particle suspended within the suspending fluid, the particles having a first optical characteristic; and a backing member disposed on the opposed side of the cavity from the viewing surface, at least part of the backing member having a second optical characteristic different from the first optical characteristic, the backing member being light-transmissive; and


applying to the substrate an electric field effective to cause dielectrophoretic movement of the particles to the side wall of the cavity.


In this process, the electric field may be an alternating electric field. The fluid may be substantially uncolored and have therein only a single type of particle. This single type of particle may be formed from an electrically conductive material, for example a metal or carbon black. Alternatively, the single type of particle may be formed from a doped semiconductor. The substrate may comprise at least one capsule wall so that the dielectrophoretic display comprises at least one capsule. The display may comprise a plurality of capsules, the capsules being arranged in a single layer. Alternatively, the substrate may comprise a continuous phase surrounding a plurality of discrete droplets of the fluid having the particles therein. In another form of such a dielectrophoretic display, the substrate comprises a substantially rigid material having the at least one cavity formed therein, the substrate further comprising at least one cover member closing the at least one cavity.


This invention also provides an electronically addressable display comprising a microencapsulated display medium including a first species having a higher dielectric constant and a second species having a lower dielectric constant; and electrodes disposed adjacent the display medium for selectively creating regions of higher and lower electric field; and wherein the first species moves toward the region of higher electric field.


In such an electronically addressable display, the display medium may comprise a bichromal microsphere having a first hemisphere and a second hemisphere differing in dielectric constants, wherein the first species of higher dielectric constant comprises the first hemisphere and the second species of lower dielectric constant comprises the second hemisphere. Alternatively, the display medium may comprise a first species of colored particles having a higher dielectric constant and a second species of colored particles having a lower dielectric constant. The first species may have a dielectric constant that is permanently higher than that of the second species. The first species may move in translational migration.


This invention also provides a process for operating a dielectrophoretic display, the process comprising:


providing a substrate having walls defining at least one cavity, the cavity having a viewing surface and a side wall inclined to the viewing surface, a fluid contained within the cavity; and a plurality of solid particles within the fluid, the particles having a dielectric constant higher than the dielectric constant of the fluid; and


applying to the substrate a non-homogeneous electric field, the electric field being greater adjacent the side wall than in the center of the cavity, thereby causing the particles to move to the side wall of the cavity.


This invention also provides a process for operating a dielectrophoretic display, the process comprising:


providing a substrate having walls defining at least one cavity, the cavity having a viewing surface and a side wall inclined to the viewing surface, a fluid contained within the cavity; and a plurality of solid particles within the fluid, the particles having a dielectric constant lower than the dielectric constant of the fluid; and


applying to the substrate a non-homogeneous electric field, the electric field being smaller adjacent the side wall than in the center of the cavity, thereby causing the particles to move to the side wall of the cavity.


This invention also provides a variable transmission display comprising:


an electrophoretic medium comprising a fluid and a plurality of electrically charged particles dispersed in the fluid, the electrophoretic medium being capable of assuming a light-transmissive state and a substantially non-light-transmissive state;


at least one light-transmissive first electrode disposed adjacent the electrophoretic medium;


a plurality of light-transmissive second electrodes disposed adjacent the electrophoretic medium on the side thereof remote from the first electrode(s); and


voltage means for varying the potential each of the second electrodes independently of one another.


In such a variable transmission display, the second electrodes and the voltage means may take the form of an active matrix backplane, with the second electrodes being arranged in a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, and the voltage means comprising row and column electrodes connecting the second electrodes in each row and column respectively.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings is a schematic section showing a white opaque state of a dielectrophoretic display of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a schematic section similar to FIG. 1 but showing a black opaque state of the display shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a schematic section similar to FIGS. 1 and 2 but showing a transparent state of the display shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.



FIGS. 4 to 6 are top plan views through the viewing surface of an experimental display in the states corresponding to FIGS. 1 to 3 respectively.



FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate the transition from the white optical state of the display shown in FIG. 4 to the transparent state shown in FIG. 6.



FIGS. 9 to 11 are schematic sections through a microcell display of the present invention in states corresponding to those of FIGS. 1 to 3 respectively.



FIGS. 12A to 12D are schematic details of dielectrophoretic switched electronically addressed contrast media of the present invention.



FIG. 13 illustrates the forces acting on a dipole in a non-uniform electric field.



FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating the variation of the contrast function with the ratio of the dielectric constants of the particle and the fluid for an insulating particle in an insulating fluid.



FIG. 15 shows a view of a variable transmission display of the present invention in which the left-hand side of the display has all its second electrodes held at the same potential, whereas on the right-hand side the second electrodes are held at differing potentials so as to impose a random pattern on the display.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As already mentioned, in one aspect this invention provides a dielectrophoretic display comprising a substrate having walls defining at least one cavity, the cavity having a viewing surface and a side wall inclined to the viewing surface; a suspending fluid contained within the cavity; a plurality of at least one type of particle suspended within the suspending fluid; and means for applying to the fluid an electric field effective to cause dielectrophoretic movement of the particles to the side wall of the cavity.


References to “viewing surface” and “side wall” herein do not imply that these surfaces are perpendicular to each other, though a substantially perpendicular arrangement of the two surfaces is preferred, since when the particles are disposed adjacent the side wall of the cavity, such a perpendicular arrangement minimizes the area of the viewing surface occupied by the particles, and hence permits the maximum amount of light to pass through the cavity. The side wall or walls of the cavity also need not be planar; for example, an encapsulated display of the present invention may use capsules as described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,067,185 having the form of “flattened spheres” (i.e., oblate ellipsoids) with curved side walls.


In this display, it is necessary that there be a difference between the dielectric constant and/or conductivity of the suspending fluid and that of the substrate to provide the heterogeneous electric field necessary for dielectrophoresis. Desirably, this difference should be made as large as possible. It may also be advantageous to use a capsule which has a non-circular, and preferably polygonal, cross-section perpendicular to the direction of the applied electric field since sharply curved regions or corners of the capsule produce increased field heterogeneity and thus assist the dielectrophoretic movement of the particles.


Those skilled in the technology of electrophoretic displays will appreciate that both electrically neutral and electrically charged particles can be moved by dielectrophoresis, since dielectrophoretic movement is dependent upon dipoles induced in the particles by the electric field and not upon any pre-existing charge on the particles. However, it appears advantageous to use electrically charged particles in the apparatus and process of the present invention since once the particles have been moved to the side wall of the capsule by dielectrophoresis, it appears desirable to use normal electrophoretic movement of the particles to disperse them; it will be appreciated that since the heterogeneity of the electric field in an encapsulated display is due to differences between the properties of the suspending fluid on the one hand and the capsule wall and surrounding material on the other, there will normally be no way of reversing the high field and low field regions in a manner similar to that used in the Batchelder apparatus, so that if the particle movement caused by dielectrophoresis is to be reversed, some applied force other than dielectrophoresis must be used.


If electrically charged particles are used in the present apparatus and process, the particles are of course subject to both electrophoretic and dielectrophoretic forces when an electric field is applied. Typically, electrophoretic movement of particles will be much more rapid than dielectrophoretic, so that to ensure that the desired dielectrophoretic movement is not subject to interference from electrophoretic movement, it is desirable to reverse the electric field at intervals; provided the field is applied for the same amount time in each direction, the electrophoretic movements will sum to zero, since electrophoretic movement is polarity-sensitive, whereas the dielectrophoretic movements will not sum to zero since dielectrophoretic movement is polarity-independent.


The dielectrophoretic movement of the particles in the apparatus and process of the present invention is affected by the material from which the particles are formed, and the size and shape of the particles. Since dielectrophoresis depends upon the induction of dipoles within the particles, it is desirable to use particles which are highly polarizable, especially conductive particles such as metals. For example, aluminum particles may be used in the present invention. It has been observed experimentally that carbon black particles, which have a reasonably high conductivity, have substantially greater dielectrophoretic mobility than substantially non-conductive titania particles. The particles may also be formed from a doped semiconductor; the type of doping is not critical provided that the particles have sufficient conductivity, but most undoped semiconductors have too low a conductivity to have high dielectrophoretic mobility.


The induced dipole, and hence the dielectrophoretic movement of the particles, is also affected by the size and shape of the particles. Since a large particle allows greater separation between the poles of a dipole than a smaller particle, increasing the size of the particles will increase dielectrophoretic mobility, although of course the particles should not be made so large as to readily visible when they lie adjacent the side wall of the capsule. For similar reasons, elongate particles, especially needle-shaped particles, will tend to have a higher dielectrophoretic mobility than spherical particles of the same volume. Anisotropically shaped particles may also be useful in the present invention.


There are two main variations of the apparatus and process of the present invention. In the first variation, the cavity contains only a single type of particle in an uncolored suspending fluid. This capsule can be switched between an “opaque” state, in which the particles are dispersed throughout the suspending fluid, and a “transparent” state, in which the particles are moved to a side wall of the capsule so that light can pass through the uncolored suspending fluid. The transparent state need not appear transparent to a viewer; as illustrated in the drawings and as described in more detail below, a reflector or filter having a color different from that of the particles may be placed on the opposed side of the capsule from the viewing surface thereof, so that in the transparent state a viewer sees the color of the reflector or filter; in the opaque state the color of the reflector or filter is of course hidden by the dispersed particles.


In the second variation, the capsules contain two different types of particles differing in at least one optical characteristic and in electrophoretic mobility and a suspending fluid which may be colored or uncolored. This capsule can be switched among three states, namely a first opaque state, in which the first type of particles are visible, a second opaque state, in which the second type of particles are visible, and a “transparent” state, in which both types of particles are moved to a side wall of the capsule by dielectrophoresis and the color of the suspending fluid is visible; if, as will typically be the case, the suspending fluid is uncolored, the transparent state is actually transparent and may be used to display the color of a reflector or filter disposed on the opposed side of the capsule from the viewing surface thereof, as previously described.


It will be appreciated that, provided that the desired color can be seen when a display of the present invention is in a transparent state, the location of the colored material is essentially irrelevant. Thus, although reference has been made above to a reflector or filter, it is not essential that this reflector or filter be a discrete integer, and color could be provided in any convenient location. Thus, for example, the colored reflector or filter could be provided by coloring (a) the substrate itself, for example the polymeric film used in a microcell form of the present display; (b) a material associated with the substrate, for example a polymeric binder used to retain capsules in a coherent layer in an encapsulated display of the invention, or a lamination adhesive layer used to secure the dielectrophoretic layer to a backplane; or (c) the pixel electrodes or another component of a backplane used to drive the display. In principle, in an encapsulated display color could be provided by dyeing the capsule walls themselves, but this does have the disadvantage that in an opaque state of a pixel the color in the portion of the capsule adjacent the viewing surface will affect the color seen at that surface when the pixel is in an opaque state. In some cases, the resultant color shift may be acceptable, or may be minimized, for example by using particles which have a color complementary to that of the color caused by the capsule wall. In other cases, color may be provided only on the parts of the capsule wall lying on the opposed side of the capsule to the viewing surface, for example by providing a radiation-sensitive color-forming material in the capsule wall and then exposing this color-forming material to radiation effective to bring about the formation of color, this radiation being directed on to the capsule from the side of the display opposite to the viewing surface.


Color could also be provided from a source separate from the display itself. For example, if a display of the present invention is arranged to operate as a light valve and backlit by projecting light on to a surface on the opposed side of the display from the viewing surface, color could be provided by imaging an appropriate color filter on to the rear surface of the display.


Except in cases where it is essential that the colored member be light transmissive, the color may be provided either by dyes or pigments, although the latter are generally preferred since they are typically more stable against prolonged exposure to radiation, and thus tend to provide displays with longer operating lifetimes.


As already indicated, no special electrode configurations are required in the display and process of the present invention; the invention can be practiced with simple parallel electrodes on opposed sides of the cavity; for example, a multi-pixel display of the invention using at least one cavity per pixel could have the conventional electrode configuration of a single pixel electrode for each pixel on one side of the cavities and a single common electrode extending across all the pixels on the opposed side of the cavities. However, this invention does not exclude the possibility that the electrodes might be shaped to enhance the dielectrophoretic effect. It may also be useful to use so-called “z-axis adhesives” (i.e., adhesives having a substantially greater conductivity parallel to the thickness of a layer of adhesive than in the plane of this layer) between one or both of the electrodes and the cavities cf. application Ser. No. 60/319,934, filed Feb. 11, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. In addition, as discussed in detail below with reference to the drawings, in some embodiments of the invention it may be advantageous to provide auxiliary electrodes to assist in redispersing the particles in the suspending fluid after the particles have be driven to the side walls by dielectrophoresis.


As already mentioned, there are three principal types of dielectrophoretic displays of the present invention. The first type is the “classical” encapsulated electrophoretic type as described in the aforementioned E Ink and MIT patents and applications. In this type of display, the substrate has the form of at least one capsule wall, which is typically deformable, and formed by depositing a film-forming material around a droplet containing the suspending fluid and the dielectrophoretic particles. The second type is the polymer-dispersed electrophoretic type in which the substrate comprises a continuous phase surrounding a plurality of discrete droplets of the suspending fluid. Full details regarding the preparation of this type of display are given in the aforementioned 2002/0131147. The third type is the microcell display, in which a plurality of cavities or recesses are formed in a substrate, filled with the suspending fluid and particles and then sealed, either by lamination a cover sheet over the recesses or by polymerizing a polymerizable species also present in the suspending fluid.


The first dielectrophoretic display (generally designated 100) of the invention shown in FIGS. 1 to 3 comprises an encapsulated dielectrophoretic medium (generally designated 102) comprising a plurality of capsules 104 (only one of which is shown in FIGS. 1 to 3), each of which contains a suspending liquid 106 and dispersed therein a plurality of a first type of particle 108, which for purposes of illustration will be assumed to be black. The particles 108 are electrophoretically mobile and may be formed of carbon black. In the following description, it will be assumed that the particles 108 are positively charged, although of course negatively charged particles could also be used if desired. Also suspended in the suspending liquid 106 is a plurality of a second type of particle 110, which is electrophoretically mobile and negatively charged, and may be formed of titania. (The triangular shape of the particles 108, and the circular shape of the particles 110 are used purely to way of illustration to enable the various types of particles to be distinguished easily in the accompanying drawings, and in no way correspond to the physical forms of the actual particles, which are typically substantially spherical. However, we do not exclude the use of non-spherical particles in the present displays.) The display 100 further comprises a common, transparent front electrode 112, which forms a viewing surface through which an observer views the display 100, and a plurality of discrete rear electrodes 114, each of which defines one pixel of the display 100 (only one rear electrode 114 is shown in FIGS. 1 to 3). (The front electrode 112 is typically provided on a support member which also provides mechanical protection for the display 100 but for simplicity this support member is omitted from FIGS. 1 to 3.) For ease of illustration and comprehension, FIGS. 1 to 3 show only a single microcapsule forming the pixel defined by rear electrode 114, although in practice a large number (20 or more) microcapsules are normally used for each pixel. The rear electrodes 114 are mounted upon a substrate 116, which contains areas of differing color, as described in more detail below with reference to FIGS. 4 to 8.


Typically the liquid 106 is uncolored (i.e., essentially transparent), although some color may be present therein to adjust the optical properties of the various states of the display. FIG. 1 shows the display 100 with the front electrode 112 positively charged relative to the rear electrode 114 of the illustrated pixel. The positively charged particles 108 are held electrostatically adjacent the rear electrode 114, while the negatively charged particles 110 are held electrostatically against the front electrode 112. Accordingly, an observer viewing the display 100 through the front electrode 112 sees a white pixel, since the white particles 110 are visible and hide the black particles 108.



FIG. 2 shows the display 100 with the front electrode 112 negatively charged relative to the rear electrode 114 of the illustrated pixel. The positively charged particles 108 are now electrostatically attracted to the negative front electrode 112, while the negatively charged particles 110 are electrostatically attracted to the positive rear electrode 114. Accordingly, the particles 108 move adjacent the front electrode 112, and the pixel displays the black color of the particles 108, which hide the white particles 110.



FIG. 3 shows the display 100 after application of an alternating electric field between the front and rear electrodes 112 and 114 respectively. The application of the alternating electric field causes dielectrophoretic movement of both types of particles 108 and 110 to the side walls of the capsule 104, thus leaving the major portion of the area of the capsule 104 essentially transparent. Accordingly, the pixel displays the color of the substrate 116.


To redisperse the particles 108 and 110 uniformly throughout the suspending liquid 106 from their positions shown in FIG. 3, a series of short direct current voltages of alternating polarity is applied between the front and rear electrodes 112 and 114, thereby causing the particles 108 and 110 to oscillate within the suspending liquid 106; this oscillation causes the particles 108 and 110 to gradually redisperse throughout the liquid 106. Application of a longer direct current pulse of appropriate polarity will then cause the pixel to assume the state shown in FIG. 1 or 2 depending upon the polarity of the longer pulse.


In FIGS. 1 to 3, the capsules 104 are illustrated as being of substantially prismatic form, having a width (parallel to the planes of the electrodes) significantly greater than their height (perpendicular to these planes). This prismatic shape of the capsules 104 is deliberate since it provides the capsules with side walls which extend essentially perpendicular to the viewing surface of the display, thus minimizing the proportion of the area of the capsule 104 which is occupied by the particles 108 and 110 in the transparent state shown in FIG. 3. Also, if the capsules 104 were essentially spherical, in the black state shown in FIG. 2, the particles 108 would tend to gather in the highest part of the capsule, in a limited area centered directly above the center of the capsule. The color seen by the observer would then be essentially the average of this central black area and a white or colored annulus surrounding this central area, where either the white particles 110 or the substrate 116 would be visible. Thus, even in this supposedly black state, the observer would see a grayish color rather than a pure black, and the contrast between the two extreme optical states of the pixel would be correspondingly limited. In contrast, with the prismatic form of microcapsule shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the particles 108 cover essentially the entire cross-section of the capsule so that no, or at least very little, white or other colored area is visible, and the contrast between the extreme optical states of the capsule is enhanced. For further discussion on this point, and on the desirability of achieving close-packing of the capsules within the electrophoretic layer, the reader is referred to the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,067,185. Also, as described in the aforementioned E Ink and MIT patents and applications, to provide mechanical integrity to the dielectrophoretic medium, the capsules 104 are normally embedded within a solid binder, but this binder is omitted from FIGS. 1 to 3 for ease of illustration.



FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 of the accompanying drawings illustrate the white opaque, black opaque and transparent optical states of an experimental display of the present invention substantially as described above with reference to FIGS. 1 to 3 and comprising a plurality of capsules, each of which contains carbon black and white titania particles bearing charges of opposite polarity in a colorless suspending fluid. The display was prepared substantially as described in the aforementioned 2003/0137717 by encapsulating a hydrocarbon suspending fluid containing the carbon black and titania particles in a gelatin/acacia capsule wall, mixing the resultant capsules with a polymeric binder, coating the capsule/binder mixture on to an indium tin oxide (ITO) coated surface of a polymeric film to provide a single layer of capsules covering the film, and laminating the resultant film to a backplane. For purposes of illustration, the display shown in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 was formed as a single pixel with the transparent front electrode forming the viewing surface of the display, and the backplane (actually a single rear electrode) disposed adjacent a multicolored reflector.



FIG. 4 shows the display in its first, white opaque state corresponding to that of FIG. 1, with the white particles moved by electrophoresis and lying adjacent the viewing surface of the display, so that the white particles hide both the black particles and the multicolored reflector, and the display appears white. Similarly, FIG. 5 shows the display in its second, black opaque state corresponding to that of FIG. 2, with the black particles moved by electrophoresis and lying adjacent the viewing surface of the display, so that the black particles hide both the white particles and the multicolored reflector, and the display appears black. FIG. 6 shows the display in a transparent state corresponding to that of FIG. 3 caused by applying a square wave with a frequency of 60 Hz and an amplitude of 90V until no further change was visible in the display (approximately 150 seconds). The application of this square wave caused both the black and white particles to move dielectrophoretically to the side walls of the capsules, thus causing the multicolored reflector to be visible through the uncolored suspending fluid. Thus, a display of the type shown in FIGS. 1 to 6 can display three different colors, which eases the problems of building a full color electro-optic display.



FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate the transition from the white opaque state shown in FIG. 4 to the transparent state shown in FIG. 6; FIG. 7 shows the display after application of the aforementioned square wave for 10 seconds, while FIG. 8 shows the display after application of the square wave for 30 seconds. It will be seen from FIGS. 6, 7 and 8 that development of the transparent state occurs gradually as more and more particles are moved to the side walls of the capsules. In FIG. 7, the multicolored reflector is just becoming visible, while in FIG. 8 this reflector is more visible but much less clear than in the final transparent state shown in FIG. 6.



FIGS. 9 to 11 show schematic sections, similar to those of FIGS. 1 to 3 respectively, of one pixel of a microcell display (generally designated 900) of the present invention. The microcell display 900 uses essentially the same dielectrophoretic medium, comprising a suspending liquid 106 with carbon black particles 108 and white titania particles suspended therein, as the encapsulated display 100 shown in FIGS. 1 to 3; however, the form of substrate used in the display 900 differs substantially from that of the display 100. In the display 900, the substrate comprises a base member 120 and a plurality of side walls 122 extending perpendicular to the base member 120 and forming a plurality of microcells in which are confined the liquid 106 and the particles 108 and 110. The lower faces (as illustrated in FIGS. 9 to 11) of the microcells are closed by closure walls 124, which are formed by radiation polymerization of a polymerizable species originally present in the liquid 106; see the aforementioned International Application Publication No. WO 02/01281, and published US Application No. 2002/0075556. The display 900 further comprises a front electrode 112, a rear or pixel electrode 114 and a colored substrate 116 all of which are essentially identical to the corresponding integers in FIG. 1. (In the same way as in FIGS. 1 to 3, for simplicity FIGS. 9 to 11 are drawn as if there is only a single microcell to the pixel defined by the electrode 114 although in practice a single pixel may comprise multiple microcells.) The display 900 also comprises auxiliary electrodes embedded within the side walls 122 and a protective layer 126 covering the front electrode 112.


As shown in FIGS. 9 to 11, the microcell display 900 operates in a manner very similar to the encapsulated display 100 shown in FIGS. 1 to 3. FIG. 9 shows the display 900 with the front electrode 112 positively charged relative to the rear electrode 114 of the illustrated pixel. The positively charged particles 108 are held electrostatically adjacent the rear electrode 114, while the negatively charged particles 110 are held electrostatically against the front electrode 112. Accordingly, an observer viewing the display 100 through the front electrode 112 sees a white pixel, since the white particles 110 are visible and hide the black particles 108.



FIG. 10 shows the display 900 with the front electrode 112 negatively charged relative to the rear electrode 114 of the illustrated pixel. The positively charged particles 108 are now electrostatically attracted to the negative front electrode 112, while the negatively charged particles 110 are electrostatically attracted to the positive rear electrode 114. Accordingly, the particles 108 move adjacent the front electrode 112, and the pixel displays the black color of the particles 108, which hide the white particles 110.



FIG. 11 shows the display 900 after application of an alternating electric field between the front and rear electrodes 112 and 114 respectively. The application of the alternating electric field causes dielectrophoretic movement of both types of particles 108 and 110 to the side walls of the microcell, thus leaving the major portion of the area of the microcell essentially transparent. Accordingly, the pixel displays the color of the substrate 116.


Redispersion of the particles 108 and 110 from the transparent state of the display 900 shown in FIG. 11 may be effected in the same way as described above for the display 100. However, the auxiliary electrodes 126 are provided to assist in such redispersion. The auxiliary electrodes run the full width of the display (which is assumed to be perpendicular to the plane of FIGS. 9 to 11), i.e., each auxiliary electrode is associated with a full row of microcells, and the auxiliary electrodes are connected to a voltage source which, when activated, applies voltages of opposed polarities to alternate auxiliary electrodes 126. By applying a series of voltage pulses of alternating polarity to the auxiliary electrodes 126, an electric field is created in the left-right direction in FIGS. 9 to 11, which greatly assists is redispersing all the particles 108 and 110 throughout the display uniformly within the liquid 106. Voltage pulses of alternating polarity may also be applied to the electrodes 112 and 114 as previously described to further assist in redispersing the particles 108 and 110.



FIGS. 12A-12D illustrate electronically addressable contrast media (i.e., dielectrophoretic displays) of the present invention which are addressed by electrodes disposed only on the rear surface (i.e., the surface remote from the viewing surface) of the display. In these displays, as described in application Ser. No. 60/022,222 (see also U.S. Pat. No. 6,120,588, which issued on application Ser. No. 08/935,800, filed Sep. 23, 1997, which is effect the completion of application Ser. No. 60/022,222), the dielectrophoretic effect is employed to cause a species (particle) of higher dielectric constant to move to a region of higher field strength.


In FIGS. 12A and 12B, a capsule 420 contains a non-colored dye solvent complex 503. a pair of electrodes 502 are disposed adjacent the rear (non-viewing) surface of the capsule 420. (In all of FIGS. 12A-12D, as in FIGS. 1-3 and 9-11, it is assumed that the display is to be viewed from above as illustrated.) The complex 503 is stable when no field is applied across the pair of electrodes 502. However, when an electric field 506 is applied across the pair of electrodes 502, as illustrated in FIG. 12B, the complex 503 dissociates into a colored dye component 504 and a solvent component 505, with the dye component 504 moving away from the electrodes 502 towards a region of lower electric field.



FIGS. 12C and 12D illustrate electronically addressable contrast media similar to that illustrated in FIGS. 12A and 12B but using two pairs of stacked electrodes 502, 507 in place of the single pair of electrodes 502 illustrated in FIGS. 12A and 12B. The presence of the two pairs of stacked electrodes 502, 507 allows for creation of a high field region in higher 506 or a lower 508 plane, thus causing a species of higher dielectric constant to migrate to a higher or lower region respectively. In FIG. 12C, the species of higher dielectric constant is one hemisphere 440 of a bichromal sphere, this sphere having a second hemisphere 430 of lower dielectric constant than the hemisphere 440. In FIG. 12D, the species of higher dielectric constant is one species 483 of a mixture of colored species 483, 484. In both cases, the separation of the species gives the effect of differing color states. FIGS. 12C and 12D further illustrate the use of shaped material 509, which may be dielectric or conducting materials, to shape the electric fields from the electrodes 502, 507.


It will be appreciated that other electronically addressable contrast media may readily be substituted for those shown in FIGS. 12A-12D.


It will be appreciated that the present invention need not make use of a colored reflector behind the capsules but may be used to provide backlit displays, variable transmission windows and transparent displays; indeed, the present invention may be useful in any application where light modulation is desired.


It is appropriate to give some consideration to the problems involved in driving dielectrophoretic displays. The basic physical principles of dielectrophoresis are discussed below and semi-quantitative predictions are derived from a simple model. This model also relates physical and electrical properties of the components of the dielectrophoretic medium to the strength of the dielectrophoretic force.


An object of charge q in an external electric field Ee experiences a force:

F=qEe  (1)

The external field does not include the field arising from the charged object under consideration (i.e., Ee=E−Eself), since according to Newton's Laws one cannot pull oneself up by one's own bootstraps. It is advantageous to express Equation (1) in terms of potentials. The potential for force is the potential energy W

F=−∇W  (2)

and the potential for the electric field is the electrostatic potential

Ee=−∇ϕe  (3)

Accordingly, Equation (1) above can be re-written as:

W=qϕe  (4)


For any general object with a charge density function ρ(r) there are forces beyond the electrophoretic term owing to the distributed nature of the charge distribution. To realize this, it is necessary to begin by recognizing that the total electrostatic potential energy is simply the sum of all the possible electrostatic energy terms calculated as the same manner as in Equation (4) above:










W
=



S







ρ


(
r
)





ϕ
e



(
r
)



dr











(
5
)








where the integral is over the charge distribution of the object under consideration. This energy can be broken up into recognizable components by expressing the electrostatic potential as a Taylor expansion about a suitable origin:











ϕ
e



(
r
)


=



ϕ
e



(
0
)


+

r
·




ϕ
e



(
0
)




+


1
2




















r
i



r
j






2


ϕ





r
i






r
j








+






(
6
)







Substituting Equation (6) into Equation (5) gives:









W
=


q







ϕ
e



(
0
)



-

p
·

E


(
0
)



-


1
6














Q
ij






E
j





r
i





(
0
)





+






(
7
)








where q is the electric monopole:










q
=



S







ρ


(
r
)



dr











(
8
)








p is the electric dipole moment:









p
=



S







ρ


(
r
)



rdr






(
9
)








and Qij represents the components of the electric quadrupole tensor.


Equation (3) is used in the derivation of Equation (7), which shows how the various moments of the charge distribution interact with the various electric field terms. The monopole couples to the electrostatic potential, the dipole to the field (gradient or first derivative of the potential), the quadrupole to the field gradient (second derivative of the potential) etc. From the expression for electrostatic energy in Equation (7), the forces and torques on charged bodies in an external field can be determined. The translational force is determined by taking the negative gradient of Equation (7). The electrophoretic force is the first order term in the Taylor expansion, the dielectrophoretic force is the second term in the same expansion, and higher order terms represent additional forces which are not relevant for purposes of the present invention. The first term of the expansion gives the electrophoretic force already expressed by Equation (1). The second term is the dielectrophoretic force, FDEP, between a dipole and a field gradient:

FDEP=p·∇Ee  (10)


Thus, a dipole does not feel a force in a uniform electric field, but rather a field gradient is required to exert force a dipole; see FIG. 13. In FIG. 13, If the electric field were uniform, the forces Fand F+ on the two parts of the dipole would cancel to give zero net force. Because the two charges that comprise the dipole are at different positions and experience different fields, the forces do not completely cancel. The resultant force is the dielectrophoretic force on the dipole. The third term of Equation (7) shows that a quadrupole charge distribution does not experience a force in a uniform field or in a uniform field gradient, but will experience a force due to the derivative of the field gradient.


Equation (10) shows that a dipole experiences a force in the direction of increasing field strength. In other words, dipoles are attracted to regions of high electric field strength. For example, a charged air-gap capacitor will attract dielectric media, the dielectric media being polarized by the electric field in the capacitor gap.


The next step in modeling a dielectrophoretic display is to consider the dielectrophoretic force on a polarizable particle lying within a fluid medium. The particle typically has no electric dipole except that induced by an external field. In such an external field, the particle is polarized, and has an induced dipole moment that can be acted on by a field gradient. Consider a particle with a complex dielectric constant ε*p immersed in a fluid with a complex dielectric constant ε*m. Each complex dielectric constant is expressed in terms of the real dielectric constant, a conductivity σ, and the frequency of the sinusoidally varying external field ω:










ɛ
*

=

ɛ
-

j


σ
ω







(
11
)








An applied electric field of the form:

E=E0ejωt  (12)

polarizes the fluid and the particle. The important parameter when considering dielectrophoresis is the difference between the dipole moment of the particle and the same volume of the fluid. The excess dipole moment is given by the Clausius-Mosotti relation:

p=4πεma3K(ω)E  (13)

where εm is the dielectric constant of the fluid, a the radius of the particle (assumed to be spherical) and K(ω) is the difference between the complex dielectric constant of the particle (ε*p) and that of the fluid (ε*m), weighted according to the effect of field gathering:










K


(
ω
)


=



ɛ
p
*

-

ɛ
m
*




ɛ
p
*

+

2


ɛ
m
*








(
14
)







The dielectrophoretic force on the particle, using Equation (10) and taking the real component of a complex quantity, is:

FDEP=Re{p·∇Ee}=Re{4πεma3K(ω)E·∇E}  (15)

This can be transformed to give the time average dielectric force in the sinusoidal external field:

FDEP=2πεma3Re{K(ω)}∇(Erms)2  (16)

where Erms is the root-mean-square electric field strength.


There are two major cases of interest in connection with dielectrophoretic displays, namely that of an insulating particle in an insulating fluid, and of a conducting particle in an insulating fluid, and these two cases are considered separately below.


A. Insulating Particle in an Insulating Fluid


In principle, all materials act as insulators at sufficiently high frequencies and as conductors at sufficiently low frequencies. Materials normally considered to be insulators may be conductive in the 1 MHz range, and sometimes at far lower frequencies, while materials normally considered to be conductors may act as insulators at very high frequencies, perhaps in the MHz or GHz range or above. A cross-over frequency can be defined as the frequency at which the conductive and non-conductive components of the complex dielectric function of Equation (11) are equal, and conductive and conductive and insulating regimes can be defined as follows:

Conductive regime: ω<<(σ/ε)  (17A)
Insulating regime: ω>>(σ/ε)  (17B).


When a (solid) particle is immersed in a fluid, in general the cross-over frequencies of the particle and the fluid will be different, so that there will be a frequency range where one of the particle and the fluid acts as an insulating dielectric material, whereas the other component acts as a conductor. Within the insulating regime, the contrast function defined by Equation (11) above can be approximated by:










K


(
ω
)


=



ɛ
p

-

ɛ
m




ɛ
p

+

2


ɛ
m








(
18
)







From this Equation, it will be seen that if the particle has a dielectric constant that exceeds that of the fluid it will be attracted to high-field regions, whereas if the particle has a dielectric constant less than that of the fluid it will be attracted to low-field regions.



FIG. 14 is a graph showing the variation of the contrast function, as calculated from Equation (18), as a function of εpm. From FIG. 14, it will be seen that the contrast function increases monotonically with εpm, and is bounded by unity.


B. Conducting Particle in an Insulating Fluid


If, at the applied field frequency, the particle acts as a conductor, the imaginary component of its dielectric constant is much greater than the real component, and hence:

εp*≈−jσ/ω  (19).

Assuming that the surrounding fluid acts as an insulator, the magnitude of the particle's dielectric constant far exceeds the magnitude of the fluid's dielectric constant, K(ω) approaches unity, and the dielectrophoretic force is given by:

FDEP=2πεma3∇(Erms)2  (20)


Equation (20) shows that the dielectrophoretic force on a conducting particle in an insulating fluid always exceeds the dielectrophoretic force on an insulating particle. To take one practical example, the aforementioned E Ink and MIT patents and applications disclose electrophoretic media comprising carbon black and titania particles in an insulating hydrocarbon fluid. If such media are operated in a dielectrophoretic mode, the dielectrophoretic force on the carbon black particles exceeds the dielectrophoretic force on the titania particles for otherwise similar conditions.


Finally, a simple model of the dielectrophoretic behavior of an encapsulated electrophoretic medium of the general type shown in FIGS. 1-3 will be considered. Inhomogeneities in the electrophoretic layer, for example those due to differences between the fluid and the capsule walls, induce field gradients. A full analysis of this problem would require numerical field calculations, but in order to develop a first approximation about the magnitude and direction of the field gradients in such an electrophoretic layer, we consider a very simple model for the field distribution throughout a capsule by making the approximation that the electric field divides itself locally between the external components (the capsule wall and any polymeric binder, which is typically present between the capsules and serves to bind them into a mechanically coherent layer) and the internal phase (the fluid and the particles therein) in the same manner as a vertical stack of these materials with no lateral variations in geometry. This crude approximation neglects lateral field components and is expected to be particularly poor near the vertical edges of the capsules, as illustrated in FIGS. 1-3. Using this vertical stack model, the electric field in the internal phase is given by:










E
IP

=



1
+


d
e


d
IP




1
+



ɛ
IP
*


ɛ
e
*





d
e


d
IP







E
0






(
21
)








where E0 is the applied voltage, V, divided by the thickness, d, of the electrophoretic layer, i.e.:

E0=V/d  (22)

de is the local thickness of the external phase, dIP is the local thickness of the internal phase, εIP* and εe* are the complex dielectric constants of the internal and external phases. In this model, gradients in the electric field within the internal phase arise from variations in the local fraction of external phase and the difference in dielectric constant or conductivity between the internal and external phases. Also, gradients in E2 are in the plane of the substrates and point outwardly (or inwardly) along a capsule's radial direction. Typically, the external phase of an encapsulated electrophoretic medium is more conductive and has a larger dielectric constant than the internal phase. In such a medium, the electric field in the internal phase is largest in regions where the capsule is thinnest, which will be along the lateral perimeter of the capsules (i.e., the left and right hand edges of the capsules as illustrated in FIGS. 1-3), or in the case of tightly packed capsules, at the surfaces of contact with neighboring capsules.


Typically, in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium, the electrophoretic particles have a larger polarizability than the fluid, and so their dielectrophoretic mobility will be positive. The particles will thus be attracted to the thinnest regions of the capsules along the lateral extremes of the capsules and especially to the vertices of the capsules.


Consider the application of an alternating voltage to the electrophoretic medium. The electrophoretic force, Fep, acting on the particles is typically sinusoidal:

Fep˜sin ωt  (23)

and averages to zero. The dielectrophoretic force, Fdep, is proportional to the square of the electric field, so its temporal variation is:

Fdep˜sin2ωt  (24)

which has a non-zero average. Use of a high frequency alternating voltage will induce small amplitude oscillations due to the electrophoretic force and a sinusoidally-modulated but linearly-directed motion due to the dielectrophoretic force. The total velocity of a particle is given by the sum of the electrophoretic and dielectrophoretic motions:

v=vep+vdep  (25)

where

vep˜μepE0 sin ωt  (26)

and:

vdep˜μdep∇(Erms2)sin2ωt  (27)


where μdep is the dielectrophoretic mobility, which can be derived from Equation (16) and the standard formula for the drag force, Fdrag, on a particle in a viscous fluid:

Fdrag=6πμ  (27A)

From Equations (16) and (27A):










μ
dep

=



ɛ
m



a
2


Re


{

K


(
ω
)


}



3

μ






(
28
)








As mentioned above, the time-averaged migration of the particles will be toward the outer lateral edges of the capsules, and especially toward the vertices of the capsules in this direction.


The timescale for such dielectrophoretic motion can be estimated in the following manner. The gradient in the mean square electric field is approximately the difference in the mean square field between the capsule center and the edges, divided by the lateral radius of the capsule. The field at the center of the capsule is approximately:










E

IP
,
center


=



1
+


H
-

h
c



h
c




1
+



ɛ
IP
*


ɛ
e
*





H
-

h
c



h
c







E
0






(
29
)








where H is the ink thickness and hc is the height of the internal phase at capsule center. At the lateral edge of the capsule, the thickness of the internal phase goes to zero and the field at the internal phase goes to:










E

IP
,
edge


=



ɛ
e
*


ɛ
IP
*




E
0






(
30
)








The gradient in the mean square field can be approximated by:












(

E
2

)


=



E
0
2


a
c




[



(


1
+


H
-

h
c



h
c




1
+



ɛ
IP
*


ɛ
e
*





H
-

h
c



h
c





)

2

-


(


ɛ
e
*


ɛ
IP
*


)

2


]






(
31
)








where ac is the lateral radius of the capsule.


It should be noted that since practical encapsulated electrophoretic media are composites of several components, the electric field across any of the components will be a function of the electrical behavior of all the other components. For example, over short time scales, differences in dielectric constants between the various components will cause electric field lines to be bent, concentrated, or rarified in various regions. Over time scales longer than ohmic relaxation times, conductivity variations will determine these effects.


As previously mentioned, in another aspect this invention provides a variable transmission display comprising: an electrophoretic medium comprising a fluid and a plurality of electrically charged particles dispersed in the fluid, the electrophoretic medium being capable of assuming a light-transmissive state and a substantially non-light-transmissive state; at least one light-transmissive first electrode disposed adjacent the electrophoretic medium; a plurality of light-transmissive second electrodes disposed adjacent the electrophoretic medium on the side thereof remote from the first electrode(s); and voltage means for varying the potential each of the second electrodes independently of one another. The variable transmission displays or windows of the present invention are capable of displaying at least two optical states, namely: non-private (clear) and private, which may be a scattering state, or a white, black, or other color states. Thus, windows of the present invention may have clear and opaque states, clear and white states, clear and black states, or clear and colored states; other combinations of optical states may also be used.


The variable transmission windows of the present invention have two principal advantages. Firstly, such windows provide signage capabilities in addition to full area variable transmission. These signage capabilities are provided by local (pixilated) instead of global (full-area) switching to display information, including letters, graphics, images, or patterns. Such signage capability allows, useful and changing information such as name of business, opening hours, time, temperature, prices, advertizing, menus, logos, images can be displayed, and no cost is incurred by a landlord of business premises when tenants change. Such signage capability requires the use of an array of second electrodes of a size similar to that used in conventional signage, plus drivers and control electronics. However, the second electrodes used in the present windows can be substantially larger than those in, for example, electronic book readers; whereas an electronic book reader typically has about 160 second electrodes per inch (about 6.3 per millimeter), windows of the present invention may make use of second electrodes having second electrodes about ⅛ inch (about 3 mm) square.


Secondly, the decorative or informative patterns can be written on the variable transmission window to hide the non-uniformities which in practice always occur in such windows. In theory, a variable transmission window should display an absolutely uniform optical state in both its transmissive and non-transmissive optical states. The human eye is very sensitive to even minor variations in large, supposedly uniform areas of color, and in practice large variable transmission electrophoretic windows always display visible non-uniformities. The variable transmission windows of the present invention can display a simple random binary pixel pattern (“white noise”) which effectively hides display non-uniformity while providing privacy veiling and being decorative. FIG. 15 of the accompanying drawings illustrates this effect. This Figure shows a variable transmission electrophoretic display of the present invention in which the left-hand half of the display (as illustrated) is set to a uniform gray level, whereas the right-hand half of the display is set to a random pixel pattern. It will be seen from FIG. 15 that the inconsistencies in the electrophoretic medium cause readily visible defects in the supposedly uniform gray level on the left-hand side of the display, whereas such defects are much less visible in the random pattern on the right-hand side of the display. Accordingly, as may be seen from FIG. 15, the present inventions allows saving costs required to achieve coating uniformity without visible mottle, streaks, or point defects.


The present invention allows for the retrofitting of conventional windows to form electrophoretic variable transmission windows of the invention, or for the formation of windows of the invention on any desired conventional glass substrate. For example, a matrix of second electrodes, typically provided with thin film transistors (TFT's) can be formed on a self-adhesive plastic film, which can then be laminated to a glass substrate. The electrophoretic medium can them be applied by spray coating or other similar techniques over the matrix of second electrodes. Alternatively, a front plane laminate (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,982,178) can be laminated to the matrix of second electrodes.


The variable transmission windows of the present invention costs have low initial manufacturing costs than similar liquid crystal based windows, and lower power consumption in operation. In addition, as already noted, the present windows can be retrofitted to existing architectural glazing, saving considerable building costs and time.


Those skilled in the display art will appreciate that numerous changes, improvements and modifications can be made in the preferred embodiments of the invention already described without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is intended to be construed in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.

Claims
  • 1. A variable transmission display comprising: an electrophoretic medium comprising a fluid and a plurality of electrically charged particles dispersed in the fluid, the electrophoretic medium being capable of assuming a light-transmissive state and a substantially non-light-transmissive state;at least one light-transmissive first electrode disposed adjacent the electrophoretic medium;a plurality of light-transmissive second electrodes disposed adjacent the electrophoretic medium on the side thereof remote from the first electrode(s), the second electrodes being arranged in a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns; andvoltage means for varying the potential of each of the second electrodes independently of one another, the voltage means comprising row and column electrodes connecting the second electrodes in each row and column respectively.
  • 2. A variable transmission display according to claim 1 further comprising a transistor associated with each second electrode.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a division of application Ser. No. 14/638,707, filed Mar. 4, 2015 (Publication No. 2015/0177589, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,664,978, issued May 30, 2017), which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/694,156 (Publication No. 2013/0063333, now abandoned), which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/549,763 (Publication No. 2010/0045592, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,305,341, issued Nov. 6, 2012), which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/799,377, filed May 1, 2007 (Publication No. 2008/0117495, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,583,251, issued Sep. 1, 2009), which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/687,166, filed Oct. 16, 2003 (Publication No. 2004/0136048, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,744, issued Aug. 21, 2007), which itself claims benefit of Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/419,019, filed Oct. 16, 2002. The entire disclosure of all the aforementioned applications, and of all U.S. patents and published applications mentioned below, is herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (544)
Number Name Date Kind
3036388 Tate May 1962 A
3385927 Hamann May 1968 A
3406363 Tate Oct 1968 A
3460248 Tate Aug 1969 A
3560956 Sinnott Feb 1971 A
3617374 Hodson et al. Nov 1971 A
3668106 Ota Jun 1972 A
3689400 Ota et al. Sep 1972 A
3697150 Wysocki Oct 1972 A
3700802 Markin et al. Oct 1972 A
3756693 Ota Sep 1973 A
3765011 Sawyer et al. Oct 1973 A
3767392 Ota Oct 1973 A
3792308 Ota Feb 1974 A
3806893 Ohnishi et al. Apr 1974 A
3850627 Wells et al. Nov 1974 A
3870517 Ota et al. Mar 1975 A
3892568 Ota Jul 1975 A
3960439 Becker Jun 1976 A
3980476 Wysocki Sep 1976 A
4041481 Sato Aug 1977 A
4045327 Noma Aug 1977 A
4068927 White Jan 1978 A
4071430 Liebert Jan 1978 A
4088395 Gigila May 1978 A
4123346 Ploix Oct 1978 A
4126854 Sheridon Nov 1978 A
4143103 Sheridon Mar 1979 A
4187160 Zimmermann Feb 1980 A
4203106 Dalisa May 1980 A
4218302 Dalisa Aug 1980 A
4231641 Randin Nov 1980 A
4261653 Goodrich Apr 1981 A
4305807 Somlyody Dec 1981 A
4330788 Hinz May 1982 A
4345249 Togashi Aug 1982 A
4368952 Murata Jan 1983 A
4390403 Batchelder Jun 1983 A
4402062 Batchelder Aug 1983 A
4407565 Saxe Oct 1983 A
4411495 Beni Oct 1983 A
4418346 Batchelder Nov 1983 A
4419383 Lee Dec 1983 A
4430648 Togashi Feb 1984 A
4435047 Fergason Mar 1984 A
4438160 Ishikawa Mar 1984 A
4450440 White May 1984 A
4509828 Clerc Apr 1985 A
4522472 Liebert Jun 1985 A
4598960 DiSanto Jul 1986 A
4605284 Fergason Aug 1986 A
4616903 Fergason Oct 1986 A
4643528 Bell, Jr. Feb 1987 A
4648956 Marshall Mar 1987 A
4655897 DiSanto Apr 1987 A
4703573 Montgomery Nov 1987 A
4707080 Fergason Nov 1987 A
4732830 DiSanto Mar 1988 A
4741604 Kornfeld May 1988 A
4742345 DiSanto May 1988 A
4746917 DiSanto May 1988 A
4772820 DiSanto Sep 1988 A
4776675 Takaochi Oct 1988 A
4833060 Nair May 1989 A
4833464 DiSanto May 1989 A
4835084 Nair May 1989 A
4850919 DiSanto Jul 1989 A
4870398 Bos Sep 1989 A
4919521 Tada Apr 1990 A
4947157 DiSanto Aug 1990 A
4947159 DiSanto Aug 1990 A
4948232 Lange Aug 1990 A
4965131 Nair Oct 1990 A
4994312 Maier Feb 1991 A
5041824 DiSanto Aug 1991 A
5053763 DiSanto Oct 1991 A
5055371 Lee Oct 1991 A
5066105 Yoshimoto Nov 1991 A
5066946 DiSanto Nov 1991 A
5077157 DiSanto Dec 1991 A
5105185 Nakanowatari Apr 1992 A
5109354 Yamashita et al. Apr 1992 A
5119218 Yoshimoto Jun 1992 A
5128785 Yoshimoto Jul 1992 A
5138472 Jones Aug 1992 A
5167508 McTaggart Dec 1992 A
5174882 DiSanto Dec 1992 A
5177476 DiSanto Jan 1993 A
5181016 Lee Jan 1993 A
5187609 DiSanto Feb 1993 A
5216416 DiSanto Jun 1993 A
5216530 Pearlman Jun 1993 A
5220316 Kazan Jun 1993 A
5223115 DiSanto Jun 1993 A
5223823 DiSanto Jun 1993 A
5247290 DiSanto Sep 1993 A
5250938 DiSanto Oct 1993 A
5254981 DiSanto Oct 1993 A
5262098 Crowley Nov 1993 A
5266937 DiSanto Nov 1993 A
5270843 Wang Dec 1993 A
5276438 DiSanto Jan 1994 A
5279694 DiSanto Jan 1994 A
5280280 Hotto Jan 1994 A
5293528 DiSanto Mar 1994 A
5302235 DiSanto Apr 1994 A
5304439 DiSanto Apr 1994 A
5315312 DiSanto May 1994 A
5316341 Schwartz May 1994 A
5344594 Sheridon Sep 1994 A
5345251 DiSanto Sep 1994 A
5354799 Bennett Oct 1994 A
5357355 Arai Oct 1994 A
5359346 DiSanto Oct 1994 A
5377258 Bro Dec 1994 A
5383008 Sheridon Jan 1995 A
5389945 Sheridon Feb 1995 A
5390026 Lim Feb 1995 A
5398131 Hall Mar 1995 A
5402145 DiSanto Mar 1995 A
5407231 Schwartz Apr 1995 A
5411398 Nakanishi May 1995 A
5411656 Schubert May 1995 A
5412398 DiSanto May 1995 A
5460688 DiSanto Oct 1995 A
5463491 Check, III Oct 1995 A
5463492 Check, III Oct 1995 A
5467107 DiSanto Nov 1995 A
5467217 Check, III Nov 1995 A
5484292 McTaggart Jan 1996 A
5485176 Ohara Jan 1996 A
5488499 Tanaka Jan 1996 A
5499038 DiSanto Mar 1996 A
5508068 Nakano Apr 1996 A
5508720 DiSanto Apr 1996 A
5512162 Sachs Apr 1996 A
5530567 Takei Jun 1996 A
5534888 Lebby Jul 1996 A
5535027 Kimura Jul 1996 A
5538430 Smith Jul 1996 A
5561443 DiSanto Oct 1996 A
5565885 Tamanoi Oct 1996 A
5573711 Hou Nov 1996 A
5576867 Baur Nov 1996 A
5580692 Lofftus Dec 1996 A
5582700 Bryning Dec 1996 A
5594562 Sato Jan 1997 A
5604027 Sheridon Feb 1997 A
5625460 Tai Apr 1997 A
5627561 Laspina May 1997 A
5642211 Okano Jun 1997 A
5643673 Hou Jul 1997 A
5650872 Saxe Jul 1997 A
5654732 Katakura Aug 1997 A
5659330 Sheridon Aug 1997 A
5675719 Matias Oct 1997 A
5684365 Tang Nov 1997 A
5684500 Morin Nov 1997 A
5684501 Knapp Nov 1997 A
5689282 Wolfs Nov 1997 A
5694224 Tai Dec 1997 A
5699074 Sutherland Dec 1997 A
5700608 Eshelman Dec 1997 A
5707738 Hou Jan 1998 A
5708525 Sheridon Jan 1998 A
5717283 Biegelsen Feb 1998 A
5717514 Sheridon Feb 1998 A
5717515 Sheridon Feb 1998 A
5729663 Lin Mar 1998 A
5731792 Sheridon Mar 1998 A
5737115 Mackinlay Apr 1998 A
5739801 Sheridon Apr 1998 A
5745094 Gordon, II et al. Apr 1998 A
5751266 Crossland May 1998 A
5760761 Sheridon Jun 1998 A
5777782 Sheridon Jul 1998 A
5783368 Richter Jul 1998 A
5798315 Etoh Aug 1998 A
5808783 Crowley Sep 1998 A
5818556 Havens Oct 1998 A
5835075 Nomura Nov 1998 A
5852427 Buzak Dec 1998 A
5866284 Vincent Feb 1999 A
5872552 Gordon, II Feb 1999 A
5892504 Knapp Apr 1999 A
5896117 Moon Apr 1999 A
5898416 Kuijk Apr 1999 A
5900192 Richley May 1999 A
5930026 Jacobson Jul 1999 A
5933203 Wu Aug 1999 A
5961804 Jacobson Oct 1999 A
5963456 Klein Oct 1999 A
5978052 Ilcisin Nov 1999 A
6002384 Tamai Dec 1999 A
6017584 Albert Jan 2000 A
6025896 Hattori Feb 2000 A
6034807 Little Mar 2000 A
6046716 McKnight Apr 2000 A
6052106 Maltese Apr 2000 A
6054071 Mikkelsen, Jr. Apr 2000 A
6055091 Sheridon Apr 2000 A
6055180 Gudesen Apr 2000 A
6057814 Kalt May 2000 A
6064410 Wen May 2000 A
6064784 Whitehead May 2000 A
6067185 Albert May 2000 A
6081285 Wen Jun 2000 A
6097531 Sheridon Aug 2000 A
6118426 Albert Sep 2000 A
6120588 Jacobson Sep 2000 A
6120839 Comiskey Sep 2000 A
6124851 Jacobson Sep 2000 A
6128124 Silverman Oct 2000 A
6130773 Jacobson Oct 2000 A
6130774 Albert Oct 2000 A
6137467 Sheridon Oct 2000 A
6144361 Gordon, II Nov 2000 A
6147791 Sheridon Nov 2000 A
6154190 Yang Nov 2000 A
6156473 Tyagi Dec 2000 A
6172798 Albert Jan 2001 B1
6177921 Comiskey Jan 2001 B1
6184856 Gordon, II Feb 2001 B1
6211853 Takeuchi Apr 2001 B1
6211998 Sheridon Apr 2001 B1
6215540 Stephenson Apr 2001 B1
6215920 Whitehead Apr 2001 B1
6225971 Gordon, II May 2001 B1
6232950 Albert May 2001 B1
6236385 Nomura May 2001 B1
6239896 Ikeda May 2001 B1
6241921 Jacobson Jun 2001 B1
6249271 Albert Jun 2001 B1
6252564 Albert Jun 2001 B1
6262706 Albert Jul 2001 B1
6262833 Loxley Jul 2001 B1
6271823 Gordon, II Aug 2001 B1
6281643 Ebihara Aug 2001 B1
6300932 Albert Oct 2001 B1
6301038 Fitzmaurice Oct 2001 B1
6312304 Duthaler Nov 2001 B1
6312971 Amundson Nov 2001 B1
6320565 Albu Nov 2001 B1
6323989 Jacobson Nov 2001 B1
6327072 Comiskey Dec 2001 B1
6330054 Ikami Dec 2001 B1
6348908 Richley Feb 2002 B1
6359605 Knapp Mar 2002 B1
6373461 Hasegawa Apr 2002 B1
6376828 Comiskey Apr 2002 B1
6377383 Whitehead Apr 2002 B1
6377387 Duthaler Apr 2002 B1
6392785 Albert May 2002 B1
6392786 Albert May 2002 B1
6407763 Yamaguchi Jun 2002 B1
6413790 Duthaler Jul 2002 B1
6421033 Williams Jul 2002 B1
6422687 Jacobson Jul 2002 B1
6445374 Albert Sep 2002 B2
6445489 Jacobson Sep 2002 B1
6459418 Comiskey Oct 2002 B1
6462837 Tone Oct 2002 B1
6473072 Comiskey Oct 2002 B1
6480182 Turner Nov 2002 B2
6498114 Amundson Dec 2002 B1
6498674 Sheridon Dec 2002 B1
6504524 Gates Jan 2003 B1
6506438 Duthaler Jan 2003 B2
6512354 Jacobson Jan 2003 B2
6515649 Albert Feb 2003 B1
6518949 Drzaic Feb 2003 B2
6521489 Duthaler et al. Feb 2003 B2
6531997 Gates Mar 2003 B1
6535197 Comiskey Mar 2003 B1
6538801 Jacobson Mar 2003 B2
6545291 Amundson Apr 2003 B1
6556262 Stephenson Apr 2003 B1
6580545 Morrison Jun 2003 B2
6614418 Koyama Sep 2003 B2
6633306 Marz Oct 2003 B1
6639578 Comiskey Oct 2003 B1
6650462 Katase Nov 2003 B2
6652075 Jacobson Nov 2003 B2
6657612 Machida Dec 2003 B2
6657772 Loxley Dec 2003 B2
6661563 Hayashi Dec 2003 B2
6664944 Albert Dec 2003 B1
D485294 Albert Jan 2004 S
6672921 Liang Jan 2004 B1
6680725 Jacobson Jan 2004 B1
6683333 Kazlas Jan 2004 B2
6693620 Herb Feb 2004 B1
6704133 Gates Mar 2004 B2
6710540 Albert Mar 2004 B1
6721083 Jacobson Apr 2004 B2
6724519 Comiskey Apr 2004 B1
6727881 Albert Apr 2004 B1
6727882 Large Apr 2004 B1
6738039 Goden May 2004 B2
6738050 Comiskey May 2004 B2
6750473 Amundson Jun 2004 B2
6753844 Machida Jun 2004 B2
6753999 Zehner Jun 2004 B2
6762744 Katase Jul 2004 B2
6788449 Liang Sep 2004 B2
6798470 Iwanaga Sep 2004 B2
6806995 Chung Oct 2004 B2
6816147 Albert Nov 2004 B2
6819471 Amundson Nov 2004 B2
6822782 Honeyman Nov 2004 B2
6825068 Denis Nov 2004 B2
6825829 Albert Nov 2004 B1
6825970 Goenaga Nov 2004 B2
6831769 Holman Dec 2004 B2
6839158 Albert Jan 2005 B2
6842165 Inoue Jan 2005 B2
6842167 Albert Jan 2005 B2
6842279 Amundson Jan 2005 B2
6842657 Drzaic Jan 2005 B1
6859302 Liang Feb 2005 B2
6864875 Drzaic Mar 2005 B2
6865010 Duthaler et al. Mar 2005 B2
6866760 Paolini, Jr. Mar 2005 B2
6870657 Fitzmaurice Mar 2005 B1
6870661 Pullen et al. Mar 2005 B2
6885495 Liang Apr 2005 B2
6897996 Ikeda May 2005 B2
6900851 Morrison May 2005 B2
6919003 Ikeda Jul 2005 B2
6922276 Zhang et al. Jul 2005 B2
6950200 Yamada Sep 2005 B1
6950220 Abramson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6956557 Machida Oct 2005 B2
6958848 Cao et al. Oct 2005 B2
6967640 Albert et al. Nov 2005 B2
6980196 Turner et al. Dec 2005 B1
6982178 LeCain et al. Jan 2006 B2
6987603 Paolini, Jr. et al. Jan 2006 B2
6987605 Liang Jan 2006 B2
6995550 Jacobson Feb 2006 B2
7002728 Pullen et al. Feb 2006 B2
7012600 Zehner Mar 2006 B2
7012735 Honeyman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023420 Comiskey et al. Apr 2006 B2
7030412 Drzaic et al. Apr 2006 B1
7030854 Baucom et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034783 Gates Apr 2006 B2
7038655 Herb May 2006 B2
7050040 Daniel May 2006 B2
7061663 Cao et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071913 Albert Jul 2006 B2
7075502 Drzaic Jul 2006 B1
7075703 O'Neil et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079305 Paolini, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 B2
7084848 Senda Aug 2006 B2
7106296 Jacobson Sep 2006 B1
7106297 Shannon Sep 2006 B2
7109968 Albert et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110163 Webber et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110164 Paolini, Jr. et al. Sep 2006 B2
7116318 Amundson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7116466 Whitesides et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119759 Zehner et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119772 Amundson Oct 2006 B2
7148128 Jacobson Dec 2006 B2
7167155 Albert et al. Jan 2007 B1
7170670 Webber Jan 2007 B2
7173752 Doshi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176880 Amundson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7180649 Morrison et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190008 Amundson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7193625 Danner et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202847 Gates Apr 2007 B2
7202991 Zhang et al. Apr 2007 B2
7206119 Honeyman et al. Apr 2007 B2
7223672 Kazlas et al. May 2007 B2
7230604 Machida Jun 2007 B2
7230750 Whitesides Jun 2007 B2
7230751 Whitesides et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236290 Zhang et al. Jun 2007 B1
7236291 Kaga et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236292 LeCain Jun 2007 B2
7242513 Albert et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247379 Pullen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7256766 Albert et al. Aug 2007 B2
7259744 Arango Aug 2007 B2
7280094 Albert Oct 2007 B2
7283119 Kishi Oct 2007 B2
7304634 Albert et al. Dec 2007 B2
7304787 Whitesides et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312784 Baucom et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312794 Zehner Dec 2007 B2
7312916 Pullen Dec 2007 B2
7321459 Masuda et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327511 Whitesides et al. Feb 2008 B2
7339715 Webber et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349148 Doshi et al. Mar 2008 B2
7352353 Albert Apr 2008 B2
7365394 Denis et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365733 Duthaler Apr 2008 B2
7369299 Sakurai et al. May 2008 B2
7375875 Whitesides May 2008 B2
7382363 Albert et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388572 Duthaler et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391555 Albert et al. Jun 2008 B2
7411719 Paolini, Jr. et al. Aug 2008 B2
7411720 Honeyman et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420549 Jacobson Sep 2008 B2
7432907 Goden Oct 2008 B2
7442587 Amundson et al. Oct 2008 B2
7443571 LeCain et al. Oct 2008 B2
7453445 Amundson Nov 2008 B2
7477444 Cao et al. Jan 2009 B2
7492339 Amundson Feb 2009 B2
7492497 Paolini, Jr. Feb 2009 B2
7513813 Paolini, Jr. et al. Apr 2009 B2
7525719 Yakushiji Apr 2009 B2
7528822 Amundson May 2009 B2
7532388 Whitesides et al. May 2009 B2
7535624 Amundson et al. May 2009 B2
7545358 Gates et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551346 Fazel Jun 2009 B2
7554712 Patry et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561324 Duthaler et al. Jul 2009 B2
7583251 Arango Sep 2009 B2
7583427 Danner Sep 2009 B2
7598173 Ritenour Oct 2009 B2
7602374 Zehner et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605799 Amundson et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612760 Kawai Nov 2009 B2
7636191 Duthaler Dec 2009 B2
7646530 Takagi et al. Jan 2010 B2
7649666 Isobe et al. Jan 2010 B2
7649674 Danner Jan 2010 B2
7667684 Jacobson et al. Feb 2010 B2
7667886 Danner Feb 2010 B2
7672040 Sohn Mar 2010 B2
7679599 Kawai Mar 2010 B2
7679814 Paolini, Jr. et al. Mar 2010 B2
7688297 Zehner et al. Mar 2010 B2
7688497 Danner Mar 2010 B2
7705823 Nihei Apr 2010 B2
7705824 Baucom et al. Apr 2010 B2
7728811 Albert et al. Jun 2010 B2
7729039 LeCain et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733311 Amundson Jun 2010 B2
7733335 Zehner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733554 Danner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7787169 Abramson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7839564 Whitesides et al. Nov 2010 B2
7843621 Danner et al. Nov 2010 B2
7843624 Danner Nov 2010 B2
7848006 Wilcox Dec 2010 B2
7848007 Paolini, Jr. Dec 2010 B2
7859637 Amundson et al. Dec 2010 B2
7893435 Kazlas et al. Feb 2011 B2
7903319 Honeyman Mar 2011 B2
7910175 Webber Mar 2011 B2
7952557 Amundson May 2011 B2
7952790 Honeyman May 2011 B2
7956841 Albert Jun 2011 B2
7999787 Amundson Aug 2011 B2
8009348 Zehner Aug 2011 B2
8018640 Whitesides Sep 2011 B2
8034209 Danner Oct 2011 B2
8035886 Jacobson Oct 2011 B2
8064962 Wilcox et al. Nov 2011 B2
8068090 Machida Nov 2011 B2
8077141 Duthaler Dec 2011 B2
8089453 Comiskey Jan 2012 B2
8106853 Moore et al. Jan 2012 B2
8115729 Danner Feb 2012 B2
8125501 Amundson Feb 2012 B2
8129655 Jacobson et al. Mar 2012 B2
8139050 Jacobson et al. Mar 2012 B2
8174490 Whitesides May 2012 B2
8177942 Paolini, Jr. May 2012 B2
8289250 Zehner Oct 2012 B2
8300006 Zhou Oct 2012 B2
8305341 Arango Nov 2012 B2
8314784 Ohkami Nov 2012 B2
8319759 Jacobson Nov 2012 B2
8384658 Albert Feb 2013 B2
8390301 Danner Mar 2013 B2
8390918 Wilcox Mar 2013 B2
8466852 Drzaic Jun 2013 B2
8482835 LeCain Jul 2013 B2
8537103 Koyama Sep 2013 B2
8558783 Wilcox Oct 2013 B2
8610988 Zehner et al. Dec 2013 B2
8928562 Gates et al. Jan 2015 B2
9199441 Danner Dec 2015 B2
9412314 Amundson Aug 2016 B2
20010026260 Yoneda et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020060321 Kazlas May 2002 A1
20020090980 Wilcox et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020113770 Jacobson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020135861 Nakao Sep 2002 A1
20020196219 Matsunaga Dec 2002 A1
20030034950 Liang Feb 2003 A1
20030048522 Liang Mar 2003 A1
20030058223 Tracy Mar 2003 A1
20030099027 Shigehiro et al. May 2003 A1
20030102858 Jacobson Jun 2003 A1
20040011651 Becker Jan 2004 A1
20040051934 Machida Mar 2004 A1
20040105036 Danner et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119681 Albert et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040120024 Chen Jun 2004 A1
20040246562 Chung Dec 2004 A1
20050012980 Wilcox et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018273 Honeyman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050122306 Wilcox et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050122563 Honeyman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050156340 Valianatos et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050253777 Zehner Nov 2005 A1
20050259068 Nihei et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060087479 Sakurai et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060087489 Sakurai et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060209008 Nihei et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060214906 Kobayashi et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060231401 Sakurai et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070052757 Jacobson Mar 2007 A1
20070085819 Zhou Apr 2007 A1
20070091417 Cao et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091418 Danner et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070103427 Zhou et al. May 2007 A1
20070285385 Albert Dec 2007 A1
20080024429 Zehner Jan 2008 A1
20080024482 Gates Jan 2008 A1
20080043318 Whitesides Feb 2008 A1
20080048970 Drzaic Feb 2008 A1
20080130092 Whitesides Jun 2008 A1
20080136774 Harris Jun 2008 A1
20080273132 Hsu Nov 2008 A1
20080291129 Harris Nov 2008 A1
20090009852 Honeyman Jan 2009 A1
20090122389 Whitesides May 2009 A1
20090168067 LeCain et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090174651 Jacobson Jul 2009 A1
20090195568 Sjodin Aug 2009 A1
20130063333 Arango Mar 2013 A1
20150339983 Danner Nov 2015 A1
20150346578 Amundson, Jr. et al. Dec 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
2523763 Dec 1976 DE
0281204 Sep 1988 EP
0443571 Aug 1991 EP
0618715 Oct 1994 EP
0659866 Jun 1995 EP
0886257 Dec 1998 EP
1099207 May 2001 EP
1145072 Oct 2001 EP
1462847 Sep 2004 EP
1482354 Dec 2004 EP
1484635 Dec 2004 EP
1500971 Jan 2005 EP
1501194 Jan 2005 EP
1536271 Jun 2005 EP
1542067 Jun 2005 EP
1577702 Sep 2005 EP
1577703 Sep 2005 EP
1598694 Nov 2005 EP
S5998227 Jun 1984 JP
S6258222 Mar 1987 JP
S62231930 Oct 1987 JP
H0353224 Mar 1991 JP
H03118196 May 1991 JP
1995006307 Mar 1995 WO
1999010870 Mar 1999 WO
2000036560 Jun 2000 WO
2000038000 Jun 2000 WO
2000067110 Nov 2000 WO
2001007961 Feb 2001 WO
2004079442 Sep 2004 WO
2004107031 Dec 2004 WO
2006015044 Feb 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (99)
Entry
Wood, D., “An Electrochromic Renaissance?” Information Display, 18(3), 24 (Mar. 2002).
O'Regan, B. et al., “A Low Cost, High-efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 Films”, Nature, vol. 353, pp. 737-740 (Oct. 1991).
Bach, U. et al., “Nanomaterials-Based Electrochromics for Paper-Quality Displays”, Adv. Mater, 14(11), pp. 845-848 (2002).
Hayes, R.A. et al., “Video-Speed Electronic Paper Based on Electrowetting”, Nature, vol. 425, pp. 383-385 (Sep. 2003).
Kitamura, T. et al., “Electrical toner movement for electronic paper-like display”, Asia Display/IDW '01, pp. 1517-1520, Paper HCS1-1 (2001).
Yamaguchi, Y. et al., “Toner display using insulative particles charged triboelectrically”, Asia Display/IDW '01, pp. 1729-1730, Paper AMD4-4 (2001).
Chen, Y., et al., “A Conformable Electronic Ink Display using a Foil-Based a-Si TFT Array”, SID 01 Digest, pp. 157-159 (Jun. 2001).
Comiskey, B., et al., “An electrophoretic ink for all-printed reflective electronic displays”, Nature, 394, pp. 253-255 (1998).
Comiskey, B., et al., “Electrophoretic Ink: A Printable Display Material”, SID 97 Digest, pp. 75-76 (1997).
Drzaic, P., et al., “A Printed and Rollable Bistable Electronic Display”, SID 98 Digest, pp. 1131-1134 (1998).
Duthaler, G., et al., “Active-Matrix Color Displays Using Electrophoretic Ink and Color Filters”, SID 02 Digest, pp. 1374-1377 (2002).
Jo, G-R, et al., “Toner Display Based on Particle Movements”, Chem. Mater, 14, pp. 664-669 (2002).
Kazlas, P., et al., “12.1 SVGA Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Active Matrix Display for Information Applicances”, SID 01 Digest, pp. 152-155 (Jun. 2001).
Pitt, M.G., et al., “Power Consumption of Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Displays for Smart Handheld Applications”, SID 02 Digest, pp. 1378-1381 (2002).
Shiffman, R.R., et al., “An Electrophoretic Image Display with Internal NMOS Address Logic and Display Drivers,” Proceedings of the SID, 1984, vol. 25, pp. 105-115 (1984).
Webber, R., “Image Stability in Active-Matrix Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Displays”, SID 02 Digest, pp. 126-129 (2002).
Zehner, R. et al., “Drive Waveforms for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Displays”, SID 03 Digest, pp. 842-845 (2003).
Amundson, Karl, et al., “12.3: Flexible, Active-Matrix Display Constructed Using a Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Material and an Organic-Semiconductor-Based Backplane”, SID 01 Digest, pp. 160-163 (Jun. 2001).
Au, J. et al., “Ultra-Thin 3.1-in. Active-Matrix Electronic Ink Display for Mobile Devices”, IDW'02, pp. 223-226 (2002).
Bouchard, A. et al., “High-Resolution Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Display on Silicon”, SID 04 Digest, pp. 651-653 (2004).
Danner, G.M. et al., “Reliability Performance for Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Displays with Simulated Active Matrix Drive”, SID 03 Digest, 573 (2003).
Henzen, A. et al., “An Electronic Ink Low Latency Drawing Tablet”, SID 04 Digest, 1070 (2004).
Henzen, A. et al., “Development of Active Matrix Electronic Ink Displays for Handheld Devices”, SID 03 Digest, 176, (2003).
Henzen, A. et al., “Development of Active Matrix Electronic Ink Displays for Smart Handheld Applications”, IDW'02, 227 (2002).
Kazlas, P. et al., “Card-size Active-matrix Electronic Ink Display”, Eurodisplay 2002, 259 (2002).
Amundson, K., “Electrophoretic Imaging Films for Electronic Paper Displays” in Crawford, G. ed. Flexible Flat Panel Displays, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ (2005).
Gates, H. et al. “A5 Sized Electronic Paper Display for Document Viewing”, SID 05 Digest (2005).
Johnson, M. et al., “High Quality Images on Electronic Paper Displays”, SID 05 Digest, 1666 (2005).
Dalisa, A.L., “Electrophoretic Display Technology”, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., ED-24, 827 (1977).
Kornfeld, C., A Defect-Tolerant Active-Matrix Electrophoretic Display, SID Digest, 142 (1984).
Bryce, M.R., “Seeing through synthetic metals”, Nature, vol. 335, pp. 12-13, (Sep. 1988).
Egashira, N. et al., “Solid electrochromic cell consisting of Lu-diphthalocyanine and lead floride”, Proceedings of the SID, vol. 28/3, pp. 227-232 (1987).
Chiang, A. et al., “A High Speed Electrophoretic Matrix Display”, SID 80 Digest, 114 (1980).
Ji, Y. et al., “P-50: Polymer Walls in Higher-Polymer-Content Bistable Reflective Cholesteric Displays”, SID 96 Digest, 611 (1996).
Jin, S. et al., “Optically Transparent, Electrically Conductive Composite Medium”, Science, vol. 255, 446 (1992).
Lee, Lawrence L., “Fabrication of Magnetic Particles Displays”, Proceedings of the SID, vol. 18, 283 (1977).
Chiang, Anne, “Reduction of Lateral Migration in Matrix Addressed Electrophoretic Display”, Xerox Disclosure Journal, vol. 5, 73 (Feb. 1980).
Quon, W. Stephen, “Multilevel Voltage Select (MLVS): A Novel Technique to X-Y Address an Electrophoretic Display”, Correspondence, pp. 1120-1123 (1977).
Yamaguchi, Masanori et al., “Equivalent Circuit of Ion Projection-Driven Electrophoretic Display”, IEICE Transations, vol. 74, No. 12, p. 4152 (1991).
Wood, D., “An Electrochromic Renaissance?” Information Display, 18(3), 24 (Mar. 2002) Mar. 1, 2002.
O'Regan, B. et al., “A Low Cost, High-efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 Films”, Nature, vol. 353, pp. 737-740 (Oct. 24, 1991). Oct. 24, 1991.
Bach, U. et al., “Nanomaterials-Based Electrochromics for Paper-Quality Displays”, Adv. Mater, vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 845-848 (Jun. 2002). Jun. 5, 2002.
Kitamura, T. et al., “Electrical toner movement for electronic paper-like display”, Asia Display/IDW '01, pp. 1517-1520, Paper HCS1-1 (2001). Jan. 1, 2001.
Yamaguchi, Y. et al., “Toner display using insulative particles charged triboelectrically”, Asia Display/IDW '01, pp. 1729-1730, Paper AMD4-4 (2001). Jan. 1, 2001.
Chen, Y., et al., “A Conformable Electronic Ink Display using a Foil-Based a-Si TFT Array”, SID 01 Digest, pp. 157-159 (Jun. 2001). Jun. 30, 2001.
Comiskey, B., et al., “An electrophoretic ink for all-printed reflective electronic displays”, Nature, 394, pp. 253-255 (1998). Dec. 31, 1998.
Comiskey, B., et al., “Electrophoretic Ink: A Printable isplay Material”, SID 97 Digest, pp. 75-76 (1997). Dec. 31, 1997.
Drzaic, P., et al., “A Printed and Rollable Bistable Electronic Display”, SID 98 Digest, pp. 1131-1134 (1998). Dec. 31, 1998.
Duthaler, G., et al., “Active-Matrix Color Displays Using Electrophoretic Ink and Color Filters”, SID 02 Digest, pp. 1374-1377 (2002). Dec. 31, 2002.
Jo, G-R, et al., “Toner Display Based on Particle Movements”, Chem. Mater, 14, pp. 664-669 (2002). Dec. 31, 2002.
Kazlas, P., et al., “12.1 SVGA Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Active Matrix Display for Information Applicances”, SID 01 Digest, pp. 152-155 (Jun. 2001). Jun. 30, 2001.
Pitt, M.G., et al., “Power Consumption of Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Displays for Smart Handheld Applications”, SID 02 Digest, pp. 1378-1381 (2002). Dec. 31, 2002.
Shiffman, R.R., et al., “An Electrophoretic Image Display with Internal NMOS Address Logic and Display Drivers,” Proceedings of the SID, 1984, vol. 25, pp. 105-115 (1984). Dec. 31, 1984.
Singer, B. et al., “An X-Y Addressable Electrophoretic Display,” Proceedings of the SID, 18, 255 (1977) Dec. 31, 1977.
Webber, R., “Image Stability in Active-Matrix Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Displays”, SID 02 Digest, pp. 126-129 (2002). Dec. 31, 2002.
Zehner, R. et al., “Drive Waveforms for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Displays”, SID 03 Digest, pp. 842-845 (2003). Dec. 31, 2003.
Amundson, Karl, et al., “12.3: Flexible, Active-Matrix Display Constructed Using a Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Material and an Organic-Semiconductor-Based Backplane”, SID 01 Digest, pp. 160-163 (Jun. 2001). Jun. 30, 2001.
Au, J. et al., “Ultra-Thin 3.1-in. Active-Matrix Electronic Ink Display for Mobile Devices”, IDW'02, pp. 223-226 (2002). Dec. 31, 2002.
Kazlas, P. et al., “Card-size Active-matrix Electronic Ink Display”, Eurodisplay 2002, 259 (2002) Dec. 31, 2002.
Whitesides, T. et al., “Towards Video-rate Microencapsulated Dual-Particle Electrophoretic Displays”, SID 04 Digest, 133 (2004) Dec. 31, 2004.
Amundson, K., “Electrophoretic Imaging Films for Electronic Paper Displays” in Crawford, G. ed. Flexible Flat Panel Displays, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ (2005) Dec. 31, 2005.
Johnson, M. et al., “High Quality Images on Electronic Paper Displays”, SID 05 Digest, 1666 (2005) Dec. 31, 2005.
Dalisa, A.L., “Electrophoretic Display Technology”, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., ED-24, 827 (1977) Jul. 31, 1977.
Gutcho, M.H., Microcapsules and Mlcroencapsulation Techniques, Noyes Data Corp., Park Ridge NJ, (1976) Dec. 31, 1976.
Kornfeld, C., A Defect-Tolerant Active-Matrix Electrophoretic Display, SID Digest, 142 (1984). Dec. 31, 1984.
Moesner, F.M., et al., “Devices for Particle Handling by an AC Electric Field”, IEEE, 1995, p. 66 Dec. 31, 1995.
Bohnke et al., “Polymer-Based Solid Electrochromic Cell for Matrix-Addressable Display Devices.” J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 3612 (1991) Dec. 31, 1991.
Bryce, M.R., “Seeing through synthetic metals”, Nature, vol. 335, pp. 12-13, (Sep. 1988). Sep. 1, 1988.
Egashira, N. et al., “Solid electrochromic cell consisting of Lu-diphthalocyanine and lead floride”, Proceedings of the SID, vol. 28/3, pp. 227-232 (1987) Jan. 1, 1987.
Hatano, T. et al., “18:3: Bistable Paper-White Display Device Using Cholesteric Liquid Crystals”, SID 96 Digest, 269 (1996). Jan. 1, 1996.
Ji, Y. et al., “P-50: Polymer Walls in Higher-Polymer-Content Bistable Reflective Cholesteric Displays”, SID 96 Digest, 611 (1996). Jan. 1, 1996.
Jin, S. et al., “Optically Transparent, Electrically Conductive Composite Medium”, Science, vol. 255, 446 (1992). Jan. 1, 1992.
Lee, Lawrence L., “Fabrication of Magnetic Particles Displays”, Proceedings of the SID, vol. 18, 283 (1977) Jan. 1, 1977.
Pankove, Jacques I., “Color Reflection Type Display Panel”, RCA Technical Notes, No. 535 (Mar. 1962). Mar. 1, 1962.
Saitoh, M. et al., “A newly developed electrical twisting ball display”, Proceedings of the SID, vol. 23(4), pp. 249-253 (1982). Jan. 1, 1982.
Sheridon, N.K. et al., “The Gyricon—A Twisting Ball Display”, Proceedings of the SID, vol. 18, p. 289 (1977). Jan. 1, 1977.
Yamaguchi, Masanori et al.; “Equivalent Circuit of Ion Projection-Driven Electrophoretic Display”; IEICE Transations, vol. 74, No. 12, p. 4152 (1991). Dec. 1, 1991.
Sheridon, N.K., et al., “A Photoconductor-Addressed Electrophoretic Cell for Office Data Display”, SID 82 Digest, 94 (1982). Jan. 1, 1982.
Ackerman, “E Ink of Cambridge gets start-up funding”, Boston Globe, Dec. 24, 1997, p. D4 Dec. 24, 1997.
Jacobson, J., et al., “The last book”, IBM Systems J., 36, 457 (1997) Dec. 31, 1997.
Bouchard, A. et al., “High-Resolution Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Display on Silicon”, SID 04 Digest, pp. 651-653 (2004). Dec. 31, 2004.
Caillot, E. et al. “Active Matrix Electrophoretic Information Display for High Performance Mobile Devices”, IDMC Proceedings (2003) Dec. 31, 2003.
Danner, G.M. et al., “Reliability Performance for Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Displays with Simulated Active Matrix Drive”, SID 03 Digest, 573 (2003) Dec. 31, 2003.
Henzen, A. et al., “An Electronic Ink Low Latency Drawing Tablet”, SID 04 Digest, 1070 (2004) Dec. 31, 2004.
Henzen, A. et al., “Development of Active Matrix Electronic Ink Displays for Handheld Devices”, SID 03 Digest, 176, (2003) Dec. 31, 2003.
Henzen, A. et al., “Development of Active Matrix Electronic Ink Displays for Smart Handheld Applications”, IDW'02, 227 (2002) Dec. 31, 2002.
Shiwa, S. et al., “Electrophoretic Display Method Using Ionographic Technology,” SID 88 Digest (1988), p. 61 Dec. 31, 1988.
Gates, H. et al. “A5 Sized Electronic Paper Display for Document Viewing”, SID 05 Digest (2005) Dec. 31, 2005.
Vaz, Nuno A. et al., “Dual frequency addressing of polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal films”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 65, pp. 5043-5050 (1989). Jan. 1, 1989.
Yang, Y. et al., “A new architecture for polymer transistors”, Nature, vol. 372, p. 344 (1994). Jan. 1, 1994.
Ballinger, Dale O., “Magnetic recording paper is erasable”, Electronics, pp. 73-76 (Mar. 1, 1973). Mar. 1, 1973.
Blazo, Stephen F., “High Resolution Electrophoretic Display with Photoconductor Addressing”, SID Digest, p. 152 (1982). Jan. 1, 1982.
Clarisse, C. et al., “Field-Effect Transistor with Diphthalocyanine Thin Film”, Electric Letters, vol. 24, No. 11, p. 675 (May 26, 1988). May 26, 1988.
Hosaka, Hiroshi et al., “Electromagnetic microrelays: concepts and fundamental characteristics”, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 40, pp. 41-47 (1994). Jan. 1, 1994.
Murau, P., “Characteristics of an X-Y Addressed Electrophoretic Image Display (EPID)”, SID 84 Digest, 141 (1984). Jan. 1, 1984.
Pearlstein, Fred, “Electroless Plating”, Modern Electroplating, Wiley, New York, pp. 710-747 (1976). Jan. 1, 1976.
Quon, W. Stephen, “Multilevel Voltage Select (MLVS): A Novel Technique to X-Y Address an Electrophoretic Display”, Correspondence, pp. 1120-1123 (1977). Jan. 1, 1977.
Vizard, Frank, “Electric Tales: Computer chips replace wood chips in the pages of 21st century books”, Popular Science (1977). Jan. 1, 1977.
Wrighton, Mark S. et al., “Photoelectrolysis of Water by Irradiation of Platinized n-Type Semiconducting Metal Oxides”, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 22, pp. 17-19 (1977). Mar. 11, 1977.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170235206 A1 Aug 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60419019 Oct 2002 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14638707 Mar 2015 US
Child 15586760 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13694156 Nov 2012 US
Child 14638707 US
Parent 11799377 May 2007 US
Child 12549763 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12549763 Aug 2009 US
Child 13694156 US
Parent 10687166 Oct 2003 US
Child 11799377 US