Patent Grant
8565628
This invention pertains to the field of electrophotographic printing and more particularly to measuring and compensating for non-uniformity in a printer.
Electrophotography is a useful process for printing images on a receiver (or “imaging substrate”), such as a piece or sheet of paper or another planar medium, glass, fabric, metal, or other objects as will be described below. In this process, an electrostatic latent image is formed on a photoreceptor by uniformly charging the photoreceptor and then discharging selected areas of the uniform charge to yield an electrostatic charge pattern corresponding to the desired image (a “latent image”).
After the latent image is formed, charged toner particles are brought into the vicinity of the photoreceptor and are attracted to the latent image to develop the latent image into a visible image. Note that the visible image may not be visible to the naked eye depending on the composition of the toner particles (e.g., clear toner).
After the latent image is developed into a visible image on the photoreceptor, a suitable receiver is brought into juxtaposition with the visible image. A suitable electric field is applied to transfer the toner particles of the visible image to the receiver to form the desired print image on the receiver. The imaging process is typically repeated many times with reusable photoreceptors.
The receiver is then removed from its operative association with the photoreceptor and subjected to heat or pressure to permanently fix (“fuse”) the print image to the receiver. Plural print images, e.g., of separations of different colors, are overlaid on one receiver before fusing to form a multi-color print image on the receiver.
Electrophotographic (EP) printers typically transport the receiver past the photoreceptor to form the print image. The direction of travel of the receiver is referred to as the slow-scan, process, or in-track direction. This is typically the vertical (Y) direction of a portrait-oriented receiver. The direction perpendicular to the slow-scan direction is referred to as the fast-scan, cross-process, or cross-track direction, and is typically the horizontal (X) direction of a portrait-oriented receiver. “Scan” does not imply that any components are moving or scanning across the receiver; the terminology is conventional in the art.
Various components, such as belts and drums, used in the electrophotographic process can have mechanical or electrical characteristics that result in periodic objectionable nonuniformities in print images, such as streaks (extending in-track) or bands (extending cross-track). For example, drums can experience runout: they can be elliptical rather than circular in cross-section, or mounted slightly off-center, so that the radius of the drum at a particular angle with the horizontal varies over time. Belts can have thicknesses that vary across their widths (cross-track) or along their lengths (in-track). Damped springs for mounting components can experience periodic vibrations, causing the spacing between the mounted components to change over time. These variations are generally periodic in nature, that is, each variation cycles through various magnitudes repeatedly in sequence, at a characteristic and generally fixed frequency.
Various schemes have been proposed for correcting the nonuniformities resulting from these mechanical variations. U.S. Pat. No. 7,058,325 to Hamby et al. deposits a test patch, measures its density, and corrects using a feedback or feed-forward control routine. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0226361 by Tomita et al. describes measuring multiple patterns, each containing multiple rows of toner, possibly set at different angles on the page, and combining the measurement results to determine image adjustments. U.S. Pat. No. 7,755,799 to Paul et al. also measures test patches, and uses a defect once-around signal to synchronize the measurements to the rotation of the drum. The once-around signal is derived from an optical sensor monitoring the drum's position. Paul describes that the phase of a periodic banding defect (a non-uniformity extending cross-track) is difficult to measure because, unlike frequency, it varies from page to page.
The various schemes discussed above require additional sensors or calculations on low-amplitude, noisy data to determine the phase of banding defects and other periodic nonuniformities. Moreover, multiple components in a printer can have individual nonuniformities, which interact with each other. This results in significant noise in measured density data. There is an ongoing need, therefore, for an improved way of characterizing the periodic nonuniformities in an electrophotographic printer.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of compensating for non-uniformity in an electrophotographic printer, comprising:
providing the electrophotographic printer with a rotatable imaging component having an intentional periodic variation;
forming a test patch by depositing toner on a test surface using the rotatable imaging component, the test patch having a length;
measuring the respective densities of a plurality of points along the length of the test patch using a density sensor;
using a processor to automatically detect, using the measured densities, respective angular positions of the intentional periodic variation in the test patch and respective amounts of an unintentional periodic variation in the test patch at one or more of the plurality of points;
using the processor to automatically produce a non-uniformity map that relates the detected angular positions with the detected amounts at one or more of the plurality of points
receiving an image signal representing a print image to be deposited on a receiver by the printer, the image signal including a plurality of regions arranged around the rotatable imaging component;
rotating the rotatable imaging component and, for each successive region in the image signal:
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of compensating for non-uniformity in an electrophotographic printer, comprising:
providing the electrophotographic printer with a rotatable photoreceptor having an intentional periodic variation;
forming a test target by image-wise charging the surface of the photoreceptor, the test target having a length;
measuring the respective potentials of a plurality of points along the length of the test target;
using a processor to automatically detect, using the measured potentials, respective angular positions of the intentional periodic variation in the test target and respective amounts of an unintentional periodic variation in the test target at one or more of the plurality of points;
using the processor to automatically produce a non-uniformity map that relates the detected angular positions with the detected amounts at one or more of the plurality of points;
receiving an image signal representing a print image to be deposited on a receiver by the printer, the image signal including a plurality of regions arranged around to the rotatable imaging component; and
rotating the rotatable imaging component, and, for each successive region in the image signal:
An advantage of this invention is that it provides reliable measurement of, and correction for, unintentional variations without needing possibly-unreliable encoders. It also corrects for the intentional variations to provide a high-quality image. It can correct for variations in belts regardless of precession of the belts on their drive members. The measurements of the intentional variation can provide information about the phase and amount of the unintentional variation. This information can be used for system identification and diagnostics. Various embodiments do not require dedicated phase or once-around sensors or complex calculations. Various embodiments clearly identify the phase of the rotatable imaging component using a high magnitude for the intentional variation. This clearly differentiates error-causing components from each other. Another advantage of the invention is that it correlates sensor output to intentional variation, providing a measurement of the gain of the detection system that can be used to detect calibration drift of the sensor itself.
The above and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent when taken in conjunction with the following description and drawings wherein identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical features that are common to the figures, and wherein:
The attached drawings are for purposes of illustration and are not necessarily to scale.
As used herein, the terms “parallel” and “perpendicular” have a tolerance of ±10°.
In the following description, some embodiments will be described in terms that would ordinarily be implemented as software programs. Those skilled in the art will readily recognize that the equivalent of such software can also be constructed in hardware. Because image manipulation algorithms and systems are well known, the present description will be directed in particular to algorithms and systems forming part of, or cooperating more directly with, systems and methods described herein. Other aspects of such algorithms and systems, and hardware or software for producing and otherwise processing the image signals involved therewith, not specifically shown or described herein, are selected from such systems, algorithms, components, and elements known in the art. Given the systems and methods as described herein, software not specifically shown, suggested, or described herein that is useful for implementation of any embodiment is conventional and within the ordinary skill in such arts.
A computer program product can include one or more storage media, for example; magnetic storage media such as magnetic disk (such as a floppy disk) or magnetic tape; optical storage media such as optical disk, optical tape, or machine readable bar code; solid-state electronic storage devices such as random access memory (RAM), or read-only memory (ROM); or any other physical device or media employed to store a computer program having instructions for controlling one or more computers to practice the method(s) according various embodiment(s).
The electrophotographic process can be embodied in devices including printers, copiers, scanners, and facsimiles, and analog or digital devices, all of which are referred to herein as “printers.” Various embodiments described herein are useful with electrostatographic printers such as electrophotographic printers that employ toner developed on an electrophotographic receiver, and ionographic printers and copiers that do not rely upon an electrophotographic receiver. Electrophotography and ionography are types of electrostatography (printing using electrostatic fields), which is a subset of electrography (printing using electric fields).
A digital reproduction printing system (“printer”) typically includes a digital front-end processor (DFE), a print engine (also referred to in the art as a “marking engine”) for applying toner to the receiver, and one or more post-printing finishing system(s) (e.g., a UV coating system, a glosser system, or a laminator system). A printer can reproduce pleasing black-and-white or color onto a receiver. A printer can also produce selected patterns of toner on a receiver, which patterns (e.g., surface textures) do not correspond directly to a visible image. The DFE receives input electronic files (such as Postscript command files) composed of images from other input devices (e.g., a scanner, a digital camera). The DFE can include various function processors, e.g., a raster image processor (RIP), image positioning processor, image manipulation processor, color processor, or image storage processor. The DFE rasterizes input electronic files into image bitmaps for the print engine to print. In some embodiments, the DFE permits a human operator to set up parameters such as layout, font, color, paper type, or post-finishing options. The print engine takes the rasterized image bitmap from the DFE and renders the bitmap into a form that can control the printing process from the exposure device to transferring the print image onto the receiver. The finishing system applies features such as protection, glossing, or binding to the prints. The finishing system can be implemented as an integral component of a printer, or as a separate machine through which prints are fed after they are printed.
The printer can also include a color management system which captures the characteristics of the image printing process implemented in the print engine (e.g., the electrophotographic process) to provide known, consistent color reproduction characteristics. The color management system can also provide known color reproduction for different inputs (e.g., digital camera images or film images).
In an embodiment of an electrophotographic modular printing machine useful with various embodiments, e.g., the NEXPRESS 2100 printer manufactured by Eastman Kodak Company of Rochester, N.Y., color-toner print images are made in a plurality of color imaging modules arranged in tandem, and the print images are successively electrostatically transferred to a receiver adhered to a transport web moving through the modules. Colored toners include colorants, e.g., dyes or pigments, which absorb specific wavelengths of visible light. Commercial machines of this type typically employ intermediate transfer members in the respective modules for transferring visible images from the photoreceptor and transferring print images to the receiver. In other electrophotographic printers, each visible image is directly transferred to a receiver to form the corresponding print image.
Electrophotographic printers having the capability to also deposit clear toner using an additional imaging module are also known. The provision of a clear-toner overcoat to a color print is desirable for providing protection of the print from fingerprints and reducing certain visual artifacts. Clear toner uses particles that are similar to the toner particles of the color development stations but without colored material (e.g., dye or pigment) incorporated into the toner particles. However, a clear-toner overcoat can add cost and reduce color gamut of the print; thus, it is desirable to provide for operator/user selection to determine whether or not a clear-toner overcoat will be applied to the entire print. A uniform layer of clear toner can be provided. A layer that varies inversely according to heights of the toner stacks can also be used to establish level toner stack heights. The respective color toners are deposited one upon the other at respective locations on the receiver and the height of a respective color toner stack is the sum of the toner heights of each respective color. Uniform stack height provides the print with a more even or uniform gloss.
Referring to
Each receiver, during a single pass through the five modules, can have transferred in registration thereto up to five single-color toner images to form a pentachrome image. As used herein, the term “pentachrome” implies that in a print image, combinations of various of the five colors are combined to form other colors on the receiver at various locations on the receiver, and that all five colors participate to form process colors in at least some of the subsets. That is, each of the five colors of toner can be combined with toner of one or more of the other colors at a particular location on the receiver to form a color different than the colors of the toners combined at that location. In an embodiment, printing module 31 forms black (K) print images, 32 forms yellow (Y) print images, 33 forms magenta (M) print images, and 34 forms cyan (C) print images.
Printing module 35 can form a red, blue, green, or other fifth print image, including an image formed from a clear toner (i.e. one lacking pigment). The four subtractive primary colors, cyan, magenta, yellow, and black, can be combined in various combinations of subsets thereof to form a representative spectrum of colors. The color gamut or range of a printer is dependent upon the materials used and process used for forming the colors. The fifth color can therefore be added to improve the color gamut. In addition to adding to the color gamut, the fifth color can also be a specialty color toner or spot color, such as for making proprietary logos or colors that cannot be produced with only CMYK colors (e.g., metallic, fluorescent, or pearlescent colors), or a clear toner or tinted toner. Tinted toners absorb less light than they transmit, but do contain pigments or dyes that move the hue of light passing through them towards the hue of the tint. For example, a blue-tinted toner coated on white paper will cause the white paper to appear light blue when viewed under white light, and will cause yellows printed under the blue-tinted toner to appear slightly greenish under white light.
Receiver 42A is shown after passing through printing module 35. Print image 38 on receiver 42A includes unfused toner particles.
Subsequent to transfer of the respective print images, overlaid in registration, one from each of the respective printing modules 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, receiver 42A is advanced to a fuser 60, i.e. a fusing or fixing assembly, to fuse print image 38 to receiver 42A. Transport web 81 transports the print-image-carrying receivers to fuser 60, which fixes the toner particles to the respective receivers by the application of heat and pressure. The receivers are serially de-tacked from transport web 81 to permit them to feed cleanly into fuser 60. Transport web 81 is then reconditioned for reuse at cleaning station 86 by cleaning and neutralizing the charges on the opposed surfaces of the transport web 81. A mechanical cleaning station (not shown) for scraping or vacuuming toner off transport web 81 can also be used independently or with cleaning station 86. The mechanical cleaning station can be disposed along transport web 81 before or after cleaning station 86 in the direction of rotation of transport web 81.
Fuser 60 includes a heated fusing roller 62 and an opposing pressure roller 64 that form a fusing nip 66 therebetween. In an embodiment, fuser 60 also includes a release fluid application substation 68 that applies release fluid, e.g., silicone oil, to fusing roller 62. Alternatively, wax-containing toner can be used without applying release fluid to fusing roller 62. Other embodiments of fusers, both contact and non-contact, can be employed. For example, solvent fixing uses solvents to soften the toner particles so they bond with the receiver. Photoflash fusing uses short bursts of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation (e.g., ultraviolet light) to melt the toner. Radiant fixing uses lower-frequency electromagnetic radiation (e.g., infrared light) to more slowly melt the toner. Microwave fixing uses electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range to heat the receivers (primarily), thereby causing the toner particles to melt by heat conduction, so that the toner is fixed to the receiver.
The receivers (e.g., receiver 42B) carrying the fused image (e.g., fused image 39) are transported in a series from the fuser 60 along a path either to a remote output tray 69, or back to printing modules 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 to create an image on the backside of the receiver, i.e. to form a duplex print. Receivers can also be transported to any suitable output accessory. For example, an auxiliary fuser or glossing assembly can provide a clear-toner overcoat. Printer 100 can also include multiple fusers 60 to support applications such as overprinting, as known in the art.
In various embodiments, between fuser 60 and output tray 69, receiver 42B passes through finisher 70. Finisher 70 performs various paper-handling operations, such as folding, stapling, saddle-stitching, collating, and binding.
Printer 100 includes main printer apparatus logic and control unit (LCU) 99, which receives input signals from the various sensors associated with printer 100 and sends control signals to the components of printer 100. LCU 99 can include a microprocessor incorporating suitable look-up tables and control software executable by the LCU 99. It can also include a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), programmable logic device (PLD), programmable logic controller (PLC) (with a program in, e.g., ladder logic), microcontroller, or other digital control system. LCU 99 can include memory for storing control software and data. Sensors associated with the fusing assembly provide appropriate signals to the LCU 99. In response to the sensors, the LCU 99 issues command and control signals that adjust the heat or pressure within fusing nip 66 and other operating parameters of fuser 60 for receivers. This permits printer 100 to print on receivers of various thicknesses and surface finishes, such as glossy or matte.
Image data for writing by printer 100 can be processed by a raster image processor (RIP; not shown), which can include a color separation screen generator or generators. The output of the RIP can be stored in frame or line buffers for transmission of the color separation print data to each of the respective LED writers, e.g., for black (K), yellow (Y), magenta (M), cyan (C), and red (R), respectively. The RIP or color separation screen generator can be a part of printer 100 or remote therefrom. Image data processed by the RIP can be obtained from a color document scanner or a digital camera or produced by a computer or from a memory or network which typically includes image data representing a continuous image that needs to be reprocessed into halftone image data in order to be adequately represented by the printer. The RIP can perform image processing processes, e.g., color correction, in order to obtain the desired color print. Color image data is separated into the respective colors and converted by the RIP to halftone dot image data in the respective color using matrices, which comprise desired screen angles (measured counterclockwise from rightward, the +X direction) and screen rulings. The RIP can be a suitably-programmed computer or logic device and is adapted to employ stored or computed matrices and templates for processing separated color image data into rendered image data in the form of halftone information suitable for printing. These matrices can include a screen pattern memory (SPM).
Further details regarding printer 100 are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,641, issued on Aug. 19, 2003, to Peter S. Alexandrovich et al., and in U.S. Publication No. 2006/0133870, published on Jun. 22, 2006, by Yee S. Ng et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Referring to
A receiver, Rn, arriving from supply unit 40 (
A power supply 105 provides individual transfer currents to the transfer backup members 113, 123, 133, 143, and 153. LCU 99 (
LCU 99 sends control signals to the charging subsystem 210, the exposure subsystem 220 (e.g., laser or LED writers), and the respective development station 225 of each printing module 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 (
Imaging member 111 includes photoreceptor 206. Photoreceptor 206 includes a photoconductive layer formed on an electrically conductive substrate. The photoconductive layer is an insulator in the substantial absence of light so that electric charges are retained on its surface. Upon exposure to light, the charge is dissipated. In various embodiments, photoreceptor 206 is part of, or disposed over, the surface of imaging member 111, which can be a plate, drum, or belt. Photoreceptors can include a homogeneous layer of a single material such as vitreous selenium or a composite layer containing a photoconductor and another material. Photoreceptors can also contain multiple layers.
An exposure subsystem 220 is provided for image-wise modulating the uniform electrostatic charge on photoreceptor 206 by exposing photoreceptor 206 to electromagnetic radiation to form a latent electrostatic image (e.g., of a separation corresponding to the color of toner deposited at this printing module). The uniformly-charged photoreceptor 206 is typically exposed to actinic radiation provided by selectively activating particular light sources in an LED array or a laser device outputting light directed at photoreceptor 206. In embodiments using laser devices, a rotating polygon (not shown) is used to scan one or more laser beam(s) across the photoreceptor in the fast-scan direction. One dot site is exposed at a time, and the intensity or duty cycle of the laser beam is varied at each dot site. In embodiments using an LED array, the array can include a plurality of LEDs arranged next to each other in a line, all dot sites in one row of dot sites on the photoreceptor can be selectively exposed simultaneously, and the intensity or duty cycle of each LED can be varied within a line exposure time to expose each dot site in the row during that line exposure time.
As used herein, an “engine pixel” is the smallest addressable unit on photoreceptor 206 or receiver 42 (
The exposure subsystem 220 can be a write-white or write-black system. In a write-white or charged-area-development (CAD) system, the exposure dissipates charge on areas of photoreceptor 206 to which toner should not adhere. Toner particles are charged to be attracted to the charge remaining on photoreceptor 206. The exposed areas therefore correspond to white areas of a printed page. In a write-black or discharged-area development (DAD) system, the toner is charged to be attracted to a bias voltage applied to photoreceptor 206 and repelled from the charge on photoreceptor 206. Therefore, toner adheres to areas where the charge on photoreceptor 206 has been dissipated by exposure. The exposed areas therefore correspond to black areas of a printed page.
A development station 225 includes toning shell 226, which can be rotating or stationary, for applying toner of a selected color to the latent image on photoreceptor 206 to produce a visible image on photoreceptor 206. Development station 225 is electrically biased by a suitable respective voltage to develop the respective latent image, which voltage can be supplied by a power supply (not shown). Developer is provided to toning shell 226 by a supply system (not shown), e.g., a supply roller, auger, or belt. Toner is transferred by electrostatic forces from development station 225 to photoreceptor 206. These forces can include Coulombic forces between charged toner particles and the charged electrostatic latent image, and Lorentz forces on the charged toner particles due to the electric field produced by the bias voltages.
In an embodiment, development station 225 employs a two-component developer that includes toner particles and magnetic carrier particles. Development station 225 includes a magnetic core 227 to cause the magnetic carrier particles near toning shell 226 to form a “magnetic brush,” as known in the electrophotographic art. Magnetic core 227 can be stationary or rotating, and can rotate with a speed and direction the same as or different than the speed and direction of toning shell 226. Magnetic core 227 can be cylindrical or non-cylindrical, and can include a single magnet or a plurality of magnets or magnetic poles disposed around the circumference of magnetic core 227. Alternatively, magnetic core 227 can include an array of solenoids driven to provide a magnetic field of alternating direction. Magnetic core 227 preferably provides a magnetic field of varying magnitude and direction around the outer circumference of toning shell 226. Further details of magnetic core 227 can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,120,379 to Eck et al., issued Oct. 10, 2006, and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,728,503 to Stelter et al., issued Apr. 27, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Development station 225 can also employ a mono-component developer comprising toner, either magnetic or non-magnetic, without separate magnetic carrier particles.
Transfer subsystem 50 (
As described above, electrophotographic printers contain many rotatable imaging components, such as drums or belts. The angular position of a component is the percentage of a full revolution or cycle of an index point on the component with respect to a home position, expressed in degrees (100%=360°). For example, for a drum, each quarter-turn rotation increases or decreases the angular position of the drum by 90°. Similarly, for a belt, as the index point moves halfway along the belt from the home position, the angular position of the belt increases or decreases from 0° to 180°. The index point and the home position do not have to be marked, or be any physical structure. They can be defined electronically using encoders.
Since each receiver has a different phase, defect areas occur at different positions on each receiver. In this example, receiver 842a has defect area 850a near its trailing edge. Receiver 842b has no defect area. Receiver 842c has defect area 850c near its leading edge. Receiver 842d has defect area 842d in its middle.
According to various embodiments, non-uniformity of a rotatable electrophotographic imaging component is compensated. The component has an intentional periodic variation that produces density variations in a test target, or potential variations on the photoreceptor. First, the characteristics of the intentional and unintentional variations are measured and optionally separated from each other, preferably without any compensation being applied during the measurement period. The angular position of the intentional variation is correlated with the amount of an unintentional variation at one or more test points. Second, the correlation is used to print a compensated image. An image signal with multiple regions of data is received. For each region, an angular position of the intentional variation in that region is determined, and the correlation is used to determine the correction required for the unintentional variation. The image data in the region are adjusted to compensate, and corresponding toner is deposited. This provides a print image that corresponds to the image signal and that does not exhibit visible non-uniformities, or other artifacts, that are due to the unintentional variations. Compensation is discussed below. Various embodiments described herein can be used together with compensation for other sources of artifacts in a printer that experience periodic variations.
As used herein, “amount of a variation” and similar terms mean the size or quantity of a variation with respect to a selected reference. For example, the amount of a variation at a given point or in a given sample area in a test patch with an aim density of 2.0 can be the difference between 2.0 and the actual density printed at that point or in that sample area. If the sample area is darker, e.g., density=2.5, the amount of variation is 0.5. If the sample area is lighter, e.g., density=1.5, the amount of variation is −0.5.
In
In
In
In step 410, the electrophotographic printer is provided (e.g., printer 100,
In step 415, a test patch is formed by depositing toner on a test surface using the rotatable imaging component. In various embodiments, the test surface is a receiver, an intermediate web or drum, or a photoreceptor. Other components can be used in forming the test patch.
In one example, referring back to
In step 420, the respective densities of a plurality of points along the length of the test patch are measured using a density sensor, such as a CCD or densitometer. Other points, or multiple points at the same in-track location along the length of the test patch, can be measured. Some or all of the measured points can be used for determining the non-uniformity map, discussed below. The test patch can be measured before or after fusing. Measuring before fusing can reduce interference among effects; measuring after fusing can provide density data more representative of the user's view of the print. Step 420 is followed by step 425.
The measured densities of the plurality of points together compose a density signal. In embodiments in which the test patch is intended to represent a constant density over its area, the density signal exhibits variations due to the combined effect of the intentional variation and the unintentional variation. A processor is used to separate the intentional and unintentional variations. The unintentional variations are then correlated to the angular positions of the intentional variation. When printing, the correlation is used to determine the appropriate correction for the unintentional variation. The angular position of the intentional variation is detected to permit the processor to infer the error in the image due to the unintentional variation at a certain phase with respect to the intentional variation.
Specifically, in step 425, a processor (e.g., LCU 99,
In various embodiments, the processor detects the phase of the intentional variation by performing a Fourier transform of the measured density data and selecting the resulting computed phase corresponding to a known frequency of the intentional variation. In other embodiments, the processor detects data values above or below selected power thresholds in the Fourier-transformed data. In an example, the intentional variation is a sinusoid with a period of 360° of rotation of the imaging component. The highest signal level measured at a consistent angle of rotation over several revolutions of the imaging component is determined to be the peak of the waveform, and is assigned a selected phase, e.g., 0°. The phase of any other point on the component is thus the phase of the peak plus the difference in angle of rotation between the peak and the point.
To detect the angular position of the intentional variation, the detected phase can be multiplied by the rotational frequency of the component to provide a mapping between elapsed time since the measurement was taken and angular position. Elapsed time since a peak was detected can be divided by rotational frequency to determine angular position.
The processor also detects the respective amounts of at least one unintentional periodic variation in the test patch at one or more of the plurality of points. In various embodiments, the intentional-variation components of the FFT of the measured signal are removed from the FFT. An inverse FFT is then performed to reconstruct the signal representing only the unintentional variation. The reconstructed signal is sampled at the angles of rotation corresponding to the desired points to determine the amounts of variation. It is not required that the data for all points measured be used to detect phase, or that amounts of variation be detected at all points measured. Step 425 is followed by step 430.
In various embodiments, the processor can include, or communicate with, a phase-locked loop (PLL). The PLL can be locked to the phase and frequency of the rotatable imaging component. In an example, the measured data points are applied as they are measured to a Schmitt-triggered buffer whose output synchronizes the PLL. The processor can use the phase of the PLL as a representation of the intentional periodic variation, and therefore detect the phase of the variation by reading the phase of the PLL.
In step 430, the processor is used to automatically produce a non-uniformity map by correlating the detected respective angular positions with the respective detected amounts at one or more of the plurality of points. The non-uniformity map therefore relates detected angular positions of the intentional periodic variation to corresponding amounts of the unintentional variation at the corresponding angular positions of one or more of the plurality of points. This is described further with respect to
At the conclusion of step 430, the non-uniformity map has been provided. If compensation is to be performed using the produced non-uniformity map, step 430 is followed by step 450.
Step 450 begins the compensation using a produced non-uniformity map, whether just-produced or previous-produced and stored in, and retrieved from, a memory. In step 450, an image signal representing a print image to be deposited on a receiver by the printer is received. The image signal includes a plurality of regions arranged around the rotatable imaging component. In various embodiments, a region is a row of the image extending in the cross-track direction, or a group of contiguous rows, or a group of multiple rows, some contiguous and others not, or forming multiple non-contiguous groups of contiguous rows. Step 450 is followed by step 455.
In step 455, the rotatable imaging component is rotated and a reference phase of the intentional periodic variation is detected. The reference phase corresponds to a selected reference point in the image signal. The phase can be detected by using the sensors described above for measuring the phase, or with other sensors or PLLs. For example, a low-resolution density sensor with a Schmitt-triggered output buffer can provide a signal indicating when density has exceeded a selected level. An electrometer can also be used to measure the potential of the latent image on the photoreceptor, or a densitometer can be used to measure a continuous test strip of a selected density (before variations). Any of the above can be combined with a PLL. Step 455 is followed by steps 460-480, which are repeated for each successive region in the image signal.
In step 460, a region phase of the intentional periodic variation is determined using the reference phase. The region phase corresponds to the region being processed; for example, each row of the image has a successively-incrementing phase. In an embodiment, the region phase is the reference phase plus the angular motion of the imaging component since the reference phase was detected. Angular motion can be measured directly, e.g., with an encoder, or indirectly by multiplying the elapsed time of rotation and the average angular velocity. Step 460 is followed by step 465.
In step 465, the produced non-uniformity map is used to determine a correction value corresponding to the determined region phase. The correction value indicates how the image data for the region should be adjusted to compensate for the unintentional variation. In various embodiments, the produced non-uniformity map is also used to determine a correction value appropriate for adjusting the image data to compensate for the intentional variation. Specifically, in these embodiments the processor produces the non-uniformity map so that the non-uniformity map relates the detected phase of the intentional periodic variation to the respective amounts of unintentional variation and also to the amounts of intentional variation. Step 465 is followed by step 470.
In step 470, the image data of the region are automatically adjusted with the correction value using the processor. The correction values can be applied by adding, multiplying, or applying a matrix transform (linear or nonlinear). The correction values can be applied to each pixel of the image, blocks of the image, or the whole region. Step 470 is followed by step 475.
In step 475, toner corresponding to the adjusted image data of the region is deposited on the receiver using the rotatable imaging component. In various embodiments, such as that described above using the toning shell and the receiver, other printer components are also used in depositing the toner. Step 475 is followed by decision step 480. Decision step 480 determines whether there are more regions to be printed. If not, printing is complete. If so, the next step is step 460.
In step 1225, the processor automatically detects, using the measured potentials, respective angular positions of the intentional periodic variation in the test target and respective amounts of an unintentional periodic variation in the test target at one or more of the plurality of points. The processor directly detects the angular position of the intentional variation, and hence of the rotatable component. This is in contrast to other embodiments, in which the processor determines the phase of the intentional variation, which is the angular position of the intentional variation with respect to the beginning of the next print image to be deposited, as discussed above with respect to
In step 1230, the processor is used to automatically produce a non-uniformity map that relates the detected angular positions with the detected amounts at one or more of the plurality of points. Step 1230 is optionally followed by step 450, as discussed above.
Step 450, receiving the image signal, is followed by step 1255. In step 1255, the rotatable imaging component is rotated. Steps 1260, 1265, 470, and 475 are performed for each successive region in the image signal, in a selected order, e.g., the order of occurrence on the component.
In step 1260, a region angular position of the intentional variation in the region under consideration is determined. This is the angular position of the intentional variation most representative of the image data in this region. For small (e.g., single-line) regions, a single angular position can be selected. For larger regions, the angular position of the center or toner-mass centroid of the region can be used, or that of the leading or the trailing edge of the region, or another position a selected percentage of the way or selected distance across the region. Step 1260 is followed by step 1265.
In step 1265, the produced non-uniformity map is used to determine a correction value corresponding to the determined region angular position. The correction value is then used to adjust the image data of the region in step 470, as described above with respect to
In this example, curve 610 is defined as
f610(θ)=5 sin(θ)
for each angle θ on [0°, 710°]. Curve 620 is defined as
f620(θ)=sin(4θ)+cos(2θ+60°).
The average of the absolute values of curve 610 at the simulated points is 3.17. The corresponding average for curve 620 is 0.81. Therefore the average amount of variation of curve 610 is approximately 3.9× the average amount of variation of curve 620, i.e., the average amount of unintentional variation (curve 620) is smaller than the average amount of intentional variation (curve 610). The frequency of curve 610 is readily visible in curve 630. Curve 620 can be extracted from curve 610 by Fourier-transforming it, removing the frequency components of curve 610, and inverse Fourier-transforming the result to reconstitute curve 620. In various embodiments, the intentional variation is a pure sinusoid having exactly one frequency term at a selected frequency, and optionally a DC term. This permits ready removal of curve 610 from curve 630 to extract curve 620. However, even if the intentional variation is not a pure sinusoid, and even if it is truncated at 360° (e.g., if curve 610 were 5 sin(0.75θ), so its period was 480° and it was truncated at 360°), it can still be extracted from the measured data and used to determine phase. The intentional variation is known by the processor, e.g., by being programmed in to a non-volatile memory communicatively connected to the processor. This memory holds a model of the signal of the intentional variation that the processor compares to the data values or FFT results to extract the intentional variation from the measured signal.
Marker 650 shows the angular range over which the test patch is produced. Measured points therefore fall between 90° and 450°, i.e., between 90° and 360°, and then between 0° and 90° due to wraparound. This is a full rotation of the rotatable imaging component. In various embodiments, the length of the test patch is selected to extend over 360° of the rotation of the imaging component, <360°, >360°, or ≧360°. Measuring a test patch (or combination of test patches) covering ≧360° provides data about the entire rotatable imaging component. In this example, the detected phase of the intentional periodic variation in the test patch is 90°, the angular position of the start of the test patch.
Markers 670, 680, and 690 show the angular extent of three regions of the image data. The first region extends from 360° to 405° (0° to 45°), the second from 405° to 450° (45° to 90°), and the third from 450° to 495° (90° to 135°). In this example, the first region is the beginning of the image data to be printed. Therefore, the reference phase is 0°, the angular position of the beginning of marker 670. The region phase of the first region is thus also 0°. The region phase of the second region, marker 680, is 45°. The region phase of the third region, marker 690, is 90°.
In various embodiments, the rotatable imaging component is toning shell 226 (
In various embodiments, the average amount of unintentional variation is smaller than the average amount of intentional variation. Therefore, the processor can readily identify the intentional variation in the measured data. The average amount of unintentional variation can be smaller than the average amount of intentional variation, <50% thereof, <25% thereof, <10% thereof, or <1% thereof. The average can be taken over one cycle or multiple cycles.
In other embodiments, the intentional and unintentional variations are differentiated by pattern. Specifically, the intentional variation has a selected pattern that can be distinguished from the unintentional variation. In an embodiment, the intentional variation has a spatial frequency higher than a selected threshold spatial frequency, e.g., >5 or >10 peaks per cycle.
In these embodiments, the expected unintentional variation is measured or otherwise determined empirically before production of a printer begins. A highest-frequency significant component of the unintentional variation is determined by taking the Fourier transform of the measured unintentional-variation data and selecting the highest-frequency component with a power>−20 dB or >−10 dB with respect to the signal power of the total measured signal. The threshold spatial frequency can then be selected to be higher than, or higher than twice, the frequency of the determined highest-frequency significant component of the unintentional variation.
Providing the intentional variation with a spatial frequency above the selected threshold spatial variation permits reliably distinguishing the intentional from the unintentional variation, even when the two have substantially the same amplitudes. In one example, the intentional variation includes ten peaks spaced evenly around the rotatable imaging component. The processor locates the recurring pattern at a rate of approximately ten times the rotation frequency of the rotatable imaging component, and arbitrarily chooses one of the ten peaks to identify as the 0° point. As long as the printer continues to operate, or as long as the processor maintains information in a memory about the current phase (determined by counting the peaks as they pass), the phase of the rotatable imaging component will be known and can be correlated to the unintentional variation, as described above.
In another embodiment, the intentional variation includes a pseudo-random binary or multi-level sequence that can be detected to determine the phase of the intentional variation. A Costas or other delay-locked loop can be used to lock on to the pseudo-random sequence, and the phase of the sequence (and thus of the rotatable imaging component and the intentional variation) can be recovered from the loop. Related lock-on mechanisms are used in GPS receivers, e.g., those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,578,678 to Hurd and U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,679 to Braiman, the disclosures of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In an example, the intentional variation includes a group of four rapid peaks at 0°, 15°, 30′, and 45° phase of the rotatable imaging component, and three more peaks at 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively. Provided this pattern has been determined not to be representative of unintentional variations, the controller can look for those seven peaks with those relative spacings to determine where the 0° point of the rotatable imaging component is (at the first peak in the rapid-peak group). This determination can be made even in the absence of a significant amplitude difference between intentional and unintentional variations
In various embodiments, the intentional variation is a signal with period 360° of rotation of the imaging component, but without a sinusoidal component (other than DC) having a period of greater than 20° of rotation. For example, the intentional variation can be a selected Manchester- or 8B10B-coded bit stream. The bit patterns of parts of the stream can include encoded information about the angular positions of those parts, providing finer tolerances on the measurement of angular position. In various embodiments, the difference between “1” bits and “0” bits in the pattern provides a difference in density that is visible to a density sensor, or that is visible to the human eye.
In step 510, the electrophotographic printer is provided. The printer includes a rotatable photoreceptor having an intentional periodic variation, as described above. For example, the photoreceptor can be mounted with runout, or an elliptical photoreceptor can be used, e.g., as shown in
In step 515, a test target is formed by image-wise charging the surface of the photoreceptor. The test target has a length, as described above. Step 515 is followed by step 520.
In step 520, the respective potentials of a plurality of points along the length of the test target are measured. An electrometer or other potential sensor can be used. Multiple points can be measured, as described above. Since the photoreceptor has an intentional periodic variation, the potentials vary with the intentional variation. For example, the intentional variation will bring the photoreceptor in and out of focus with an optical writer (exposure system 220 in
In step 525, a processor is used to automatically detect the phase of the intentional periodic variation in the test target using one or more of the measured potentials. The processor also detects the amount of at least one unintentional periodic variation in the test target at one or more of the plurality of points, as described above. Also, as discussed above, in other embodiments the processor detects the angular positions of the intentional periodic variation at one or more points in the test target using one or more of the measured potentials. Step 525 is followed by step 430 (
In various embodiments, a non-uniformity map of an electrophotographic printer is produced using steps 410-430 shown in
In a printer with multiple rotatable components (belts or drums), one or more of those components can have intentional variations. The intentional variations of different components can have different magnitudes and frequencies that uniquely identify them, or the same magnitudes or frequencies. In embodiments using different magnitudes or frequencies, the processor can identify the intentional variations present, e.g., by FFT analysis, then correlate the frequencies of those variations with the frequencies of noise terms observed in the measured data of the points to determine which rotatable member is introducing which unintentional variation.
Compensation for intentional or unintentional variations can be performed in various ways. Ways useful with various embodiments include those described in commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0097657, filed Oct. 12, 2009, entitled “Adaptive Exposure Printing And Printing System,” by Kuo et al., and commonly assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/748,762, filed Mar. 29, 2010, entitled “Screened Hardcopy Reproduction Apparatus Compensation,” by Tai, et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In an embodiment, the test patch is formed (
ν=[(165°−150°)/(180°−150°)]×(0.2−0.1)+0.1=0.15.
The image data for 165° is thus adjusted by subtracting 0.15. When the image data specifies a density of 1.5, the adjusted image data specifies a density of 1.35. Since the reproduced densities are higher than the aim densities, the printer will print the region at 165° close to a density of 1.5.
In various embodiments, the correction values can be subtracted from the image data (additive correction), or divided into the image data (multiplicative correction). For example, if the reproduced density at 165° is 2.5 for an aim of 2.0, the amount of variation can be determined to be 2.5/2.0=×1.25. The adjusted image data can therefore be 1.5/1.25=1.2.
In another embodiment, two test patches are formed at two or more different aim density levels, e.g., 1.0 and 2.0. The measurements at each point are combined by curve fitting as a function of aim density to produce a curve relating aim density to reproduced density. In an example, the reproduced density for an aim of 1.0 is 1.6, and an aim of 2.0 is reproduced as 2.2. The linear fit through these two points is
reproduced density=(0.6×aim density)+1.0
so the inverse of that relationship, as used for adjusting image data, is
adjusted density=(5/3×reproduced density)−5/3.
This inverse is used to determine the adjusted density to be supplied to the printer as adjusted image data for a desired reproduced density matching a desired aim density. To reproduce a density of 1.8 on the printer, for example, the image data would be adjusted to 4/3≈1.333. Linear, log, exponential, power, polynomial, or other fits can be used. The more points are used to make the fit, the more finely the actual variation can be represented, up to the amount of memory selected to be used for coefficients and measurements. As a result, adjusting the image data can include applying gains or offsets, taking powers, and other mathematical operations corresponding to the type of fit used. Corrections or fits can be made for the intentional and unintentional variation taken together or can be made for the intentional variation or unintentional variation separately. The image data can be adjusted to correct for intentional variation, and adjusted separately to additionally correct for unintentional variation.
In various embodiments, the test patch extends in the cross-track direction, and the measurement points are spread across the test patch. In other embodiments, multiple test patches arranged along the cross-track direction are used. In any of these embodiments, different amounts of variations are determined for different points along the cross-track axis. Image data adjustments are made using the fits or variation amounts for the corresponding, closest, or interpolated cross-track position.
In various embodiments, image-formation variables are adjusted rather than, or in addition to, image data. For example, the voltage of the toning shell or photoreceptor, the charger voltage, the maximum photoreceptor exposure, and the developer flow rate can be adjusted to compensate for the unintentional variation. For example, for unintentional variation due to runout on a toning roller, the toning roller bias voltage can be varied in sync with the runout to provide higher electrostatic toning forces when the gap is larger and lower forces when the gap is smaller.
The data processing system 710 includes one or more data processing devices that implement the processes of various embodiments described herein. The phrases “data processing device” or “data processor” are intended to include any data processing device, such as a central processing unit (“CPU”), a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a mainframe computer, a personal digital assistant, a Blackberry™, a digital camera, cellular phone, or any other device for processing data, managing data, or handling data, whether implemented with electrical, magnetic, optical, biological components, or otherwise. LCU 99 (
The data storage system 740 includes one or more processor-accessible memories configured to store information, including the information needed to execute the processes of various embodiments described herein. The data storage system 740 can be a distributed processor-accessible memory system including multiple processor-accessible memories communicatively connected to the data processing system 710 via a plurality of computers or devices. Alternatively, the data storage system 740 can include one or more processor-accessible memories located within a single data processor or device.
The phrase “processor-accessible memory” includes any processor-accessible data storage device, whether volatile or nonvolatile, electronic, magnetic, optical, or otherwise, including but not limited to, registers, floppy disks, hard disks, Compact Discs, DVDs, flash memories, ROMs, and RAMS.
The phrase “communicatively connected” includes any type of connection, wired or wireless, between devices, data processors, or programs in which data can be communicated. The phrase “communicatively connected” also includes a connection between devices or programs within a single data processor, a connection between devices or programs located in different data processors, and a connection between devices not located in data processors at all. Although the data storage system 740 is shown separately from the data processing system 710, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the data storage system 740 can be stored completely or partially within the data processing system 710. Similarly, although the peripheral system 720 and the user interface system 730 are shown separately from the data processing system 710, one skilled in the art will appreciate that one or both of such systems can be stored completely or partially within the data processing system 710.
The peripheral system 720 can include one or more devices configured to provide digital content records to the data processing system 710. For example, the peripheral system 720 can include digital still cameras, digital video cameras, cellular phones, or other data processors. The data processing system 710, upon receipt of digital content records from a device in the peripheral system 720, can store such digital content records in the data storage system 740.
The user interface system 730 can include a mouse, a keyboard, another computer, or any device or combination of devices from which data is input to the data processing system 710. In this regard, although the peripheral system 720 is shown separately from the user interface system 730, the peripheral system 720 can be included as part of the user interface system 730.
The user interface system 730 also can include a display device, a processor-accessible memory, or any device or combination of devices to which data is output by the data processing system 710. In this regard, if the user interface system 730 includes a processor-accessible memory, such memory can be part of the data storage system 740 even though the user interface system 730 and the data storage system 740 are shown separately in
Various embodiments described herein can be used individually, or combined, to compensate for non-uniformity of multiple imaging components in the printer. For example, potentials can be measured as shown in
The invention is inclusive of combinations of the embodiments described herein. References to “a particular embodiment” and the like refer to features that are present in at least one embodiment of the invention. Separate references to “an embodiment” or “particular embodiments” or the like do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or embodiments; however, such embodiments are not mutually exclusive, unless so indicated or as are readily apparent to one of skill in the art. The use of singular or plural in referring to the “method” or “methods” and the like is not limiting. The word “or” is used in this disclosure in a non-exclusive sense, unless otherwise explicitly noted.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations, combinations, and modifications can be effected by a person of ordinary skill in the art within the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4578678 | Hurd | Mar 1986 | A |
| 5872586 | Shio | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5881346 | Mori et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 6608641 | Alexandrovich et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6728503 | Stelter et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 7058325 | Hamby et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7120379 | Eck | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7755799 | Paul et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7855679 | Braiman | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 20060071963 | Sampath et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060133870 | Ng et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20080226361 | Tomita et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20100097657 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100329710 | Yamazaki | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110052228 | Kozitsky et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110243582 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/748,762, filed Mar. 29, 2010, Tai et al. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120226466 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
