The present invention relates to the field of hearing instruments that include implanted transducers, and more particularly, to an electrophysiological measurement method and system for positioning an implantable hearing instrument transducer relative to a middle ear component or the inner ear of a patient.
In the class of hearing aids generally referred to as implantable hearing instruments, some or all of various hearing augmentation componentry is positioned subcutaneously on or within a patient's skull, typically at locations proximate the mastoid process. In this regard, implantable hearing instruments may be generally divided into two sub-classes, namely semi-implantable and fully implantable. In a semi-implantable hearing instrument, components such as a microphone, signal processor, and transmitter may be externally located to receive, process, and inductively transmit an audio signal to implanted components, e.g. an implantable receiver and transducer. In a fully implantable hearing instrument, all of the components, e.g. the microphone, signal processor, and transducer, may be located subcutaneously. In either arrangement, the implantable transducer is utilized to stimulate a component of the patient's auditory system, e.g. a middle ear component or inner ear.
By way of example, one type of implantable transducer includes an electromechanical transducer having a magnetic coil that drives a vibratory actuator. The actuator is positioned to interface with and stimulate the ossicular chain of the patient via physical engagement. (See, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,342). In another approach, implanted excitation coils may be employed to electromagnetically stimulate magnets affixed within the middle ear. (See, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,376). In each of these approaches, a changing magnetic field is employed to induce vibration of a middle ear component, e.g. one or more bones of the ossicular chain, thereby stimulating the cochlea through its natural input, i.e. the oval window. In other approaches, an implantable transducer is located within the inner ear or in direct contact with the round window of the inner ear of a patient, wherein vibrations are imparted to the cochlear fluid of the patient. For example, the implantable transducer may be defined by a microactuator that functions like a parallel plate capacitor, wherein applied voltage changes across the “plates” yields electrostatic forces that cause one of the plates to functionally flex as a diaphragm to input vibrations to the cochlear fluid of a patient. (See, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,984,859). In another arrangement, a number of output-side electromechanical transducers may be disposed on or within a mechanical carrier that is positioned within the inner ear. (See e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,894).
In the case of implantable transducers designed to interface with the ossicular chain, the establishment/maintenance of a desired interface between the implantable transducer and the ossicular chain is important for proper instrument operation. For instance, stimulation of the ossicular chain through vibration relies at least in part on an intimate contact interface between the ossicular chain and transducer. Overloading or biasing of the implantable transducer relative to the ossicular chain can result in degraded performance of the biological aspect (movement of the ossicular chain), possibly causing an additional impairment of hearing, as well as degraded performance of the mechanical aspect (movement of the transducer). Further, if the implantable transducer is underloaded relative to the ossicular chain, e.g. a loose connection or no physical contact at all, vibrations may not be effectively communicated.
Similarly, in the case of implantable transducers designed to interface directly with an inner ear, the establishment/maintenance of a desired interface between the implantable transducer and inner ear is important for proper instrument operation. For example, proper contact positioning of an implantable transducer within or on the outside of the round window of the inner ear is needed for proper stimulation of the cochlear fluid.
As may be appreciated, at the time of implant proper setup of an implantable transducer may depend on the present condition of the middle ear and/or inner ear of a patient. For instance, the positioning of the transducer and the nature of the sound processing parameters may be determined based on patient-specific biological aspects such as damage or reduced mobility of the ossicular chain, etc. Over time, such aspects may change and additional pathological aspects may develop. These changes or developments, in turn, may affect the performance of the implanted transducer, e.g. such as by changing the engagement between the transducer and the ossicular chain or inner ear.
In view of the foregoing, a primary objective of the present invention is to provide a method and system for positioning an implantable transducer of a semi- or fully-implantable hearing instrument relative to a middle ear component of a patient (e.g. a member of the ossicular chain) or inner ear of a patient.
A further objective of the present invention is to provide a method and system for positioning an implantable hearing instrument transducer relative to a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient in a simplified manner.
Yet a further objective of the present invention is to provide for the positioning an implantable hearing instrument transducer relative to a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient utilizing a method and a system that be may readily employed at the time of implant and/or subsequent to implant to account for pathological changes.
The above-noted objectives and additional advantages are realized in an inventive method and system which provide for the supply of test signals to an implantable hearing instrument transducer, measurement of electrophysiological responses thereto so as to yield corresponding measurement signals, and processing of the measurement signals to provide an output signal indicative of the desirability of the position of the implantable transducer. By utilizing the output signals, the method and system facilitate positioning of the implantable transducer to a desired interface relative to a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient. As may be appreciated, the supply, measurement and processing capabilities may be successively employed as an implantable transducer is successively positioned at a plurality of positions (e.g. advanced and/or retracted relative to a middle ear component or inner ear) until a desired interface is achieved between the implantable transducer and a middle ear component or inner ear. By way of primary example, a desired interface may be realized upon initial implantation of the implantable transducer and/or subsequent thereto after a period of use (e.g. to account for pathological changes over time).
In one embodiment, the electrophysiological measurement may comprise the utilization of an electrocochleography (EC) measurement device to measure the cochlear microphonic, summating potential and/or compound action potential of the auditory nerve in response to test signals applied to the implantable transducer. Such electrocochleography measurement device may include an electrode positionable at the eardrum or within the middle ear of a patient. The positioning of such an electrode may, in some cases, be facilitated by the access to the middle ear afforded by the surgical approach (e.g. atticotomy) used to implant the implantable hearing instrument. In another embodiment, an auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurement device may be employed to measure the electrical potential near the region of the brain (e.g. the dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei of the brainstem) that processes the cochlear input response to test signals applied to an implantable transducer. In this embodiment, one or more electrodes positionable at various locations on the scalp of a patient may be employed to measure the ABR potentials. In each of the embodiments described above, the devices used to generate the test signals and/or to measure and/or process the detected responses may be disposed external to the patient, or they may be incorporated into the implantable components of the implantable hearing instrument.
Preferably, a source used to provide the test signals may be operatively interconnected with the electrocochleography measurement device so that the measurement signals may be obtained in timed relation to the supply of the test signals. That is, predeterminable time ranges, or time windows, may be established for obtaining the measurements signals after the supply of corresponding test signals. Further, a source may preferably be employed that provides test signals having a plurality of signal portions with different frequencies spread across a predetermined range, e.g. a predetermined range that includes a predetermined or determinable resonant frequency of the implantable transducer being positioned.
As may be appreciated, in either of the noted embodiments processing of the measurement signals may be carried out by a signal processor preprogrammed or otherwise adapted to process the measurement signals according to a predetermined algorithm(s), or control logic, and thereby provide an output signal reflecting the desirability of the position of an implantable transducer relative to a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient. In this regard, for example, processing of the measurement signals may entail the averaging of corresponding, extracted measurement values over successive time periods. Further, measurement signal values, or averaged values thereof, may be compared during processing to predetermined values or to prior measurement signal values or averages thereof to assess whether a desired interface is present between an implantable transducer and a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient. For example, as an implantable transducer is advanced during implantation, successive averaged potential measurement values may be compared until a maximum value is reached, (e.g. corresponding with a maximum amplitude electrophysiological response), thereby indicating a desired interface. Again, the repeated steps of test signal supply, response measurement, and processing/comparison of the measurements values may be carried out according to a control algorithm, as might be implemented in a computer program.
In conjunction with the inventive method and system, the responsive action of positional adjustment of an implantable transducer may be accomplished either manually or by a controllable actuator (e.g. a small motor) so as to make the process of interface optimization partially or completely automated. For example, the processor output signal may be employed as a feedback signal in an automated positioning system, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,712,754, hereby incorporated by reference.
In a further aspect of the present invention, a user interface may be provided for receiving the processor output signal and providing a user interface output in response thereto, wherein the user interface output provides an indication of the desirability of the positional interface between an implantable transducer and a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient. In this regard, the user interface may comprise either or both of an audio output device and visual output device for providing an indication(s) of the desirability of the positional interface of a implantable transducer relative to a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient. For example, by comparing successive measurement signal values as described above, a maximum value may be identified so that a single audio and/or visual indication may be provided to a user to indicate that an optimal position has been achieved. Alternatively, successive measurement signal values may be processed and provided to the user interface to provide for successive output indications of the desirability of each given position of an implantable transducer as the implantable transducer is being advanced and/or retracted relative to a middle ear component or inner ear.
It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to facilitating and/or automating the adjustment of transducers which impart a purely linear motion along a given axis, and which are adjusted along that axis. For example, an implantable transducer might be constructed to impart a rotary motion to an ossicle (e.g. the incus), wherein the implantable transducer may be brought into a greater or lesser degree of contact with the ossicle as it is rotated. In such a case, the present invention may be employed to facilitate and/or otherwise utilize the measurement signals in the control of the rotary adjustment of the transducer so as to achieve an optimum condition of loading.
Additional aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the further description provided hereinbelow.
In the illustrated system, an implanted biocompatible housing 100 is located subcutaneously on a patient's skull. The housing 100 includes a wireless audio signal link receiver/transmitter 118 (e.g. an RF signal transceiver comprising a coil element) and a signal processor 104 (e.g. comprising processing circuitry and/or a microprocessor). The signal processor 104 is electrically interconnected via wire 106 to an implanted transducer 108 for stimulating a middle ear component of a patient.
The transducer 108 is supportably positioned by a mounting apparatus 116. The mounting apparatus 116 extends through (e.g. via a hole drilled therein) and is attached to a patient's skull, typically within the mastoid process. In the illustrated embodiment, the transducer 108 may be any type of transducer having the ability to transduce electrical inputs into mechanical outputs and vice versa. More broadly, the transducer 108 may include without limitation electromagnetic transducers, piezoelectric transducers, etc.
For purposes of illustration, the transducer 108 will be described as an electromagnetic transducer in the following description. In that regard, the transducer 108 includes an actuator 112, which according to this example, is designed to transmit axial vibrations to a member of a ossicular chain of the patient (e.g. the incus 120). The transducer 108 also includes a driver (not shown on
Referring to
During operation, acoustic signals are received at the microphone 208 and processed by the SSP unit within external housing 200. As will be appreciated, the SSP unit may utilize digital processing to provide frequency shaping, amplification, compression, and other signal conditioning, including conditioning based on patient-specific fitting parameters. In turn, the SSP unit via wire 202 provides audio drive signals to the transmitter 204. Where an RF signal link is employed, such drive signals may comprise RF carrier and processed audio drive signal portions. The audio drive signals are transcutaneously transmitted by the external transmitter/receiver 204 to the implanted receiver/transmitter 118. (e.g. via inductive coupling in RF signal link embodiments).
Upon receipt of the audio drive signals, the implanted signal processor 104 processes the signals (e.g. via envelope detection circuitry) to provide a processed drive signal via wire 106 to the transducer 108. According to this example, the drive signals cause the actuator 112 to vibrate at acoustic frequencies to effect the desired sound sensation via mechanical stimulation of the ossicular chain of the patient. As above, an important factor related to proper operation of the described hearing instrument is the interface between the transducer 108, and particularly actuator 112, and the ossicular chain. That is, if a desirable interface has been established, the actuator 112 will readily communicate axial vibrations to the ossicular chain of the patient. On the other hand, if the actuator 112 is “underloaded” (no interconnection or a less than desired connection has been established), axial vibrations may not be communicated or effectively communicated. Further, if the actuator 112 is “overloaded” against the ossicular chain, transmission may be adversely effected. For instance, the patient may experience sub-optimal stimulation via the transducer 108, including decreased sensitivity to the action of the transducer 108 or the perception of distortion or noise.
Referring now to
More particularly, the electrocochleography measurement device 304 may be provided to measure the cochlear microphonic, summating potential and/or compound action potential of the auditory nerve in response to the noted test signals. The cochlear microphonic, summating potential is the electrical potential generated at the hair cell level in the cochlea. Typically, such summating potential may have a predeterminable latency range following stimulation. Further, the summating potential may have a predeterminable durational range (e.g. directly related to the test signal duration) and predeterminable absolute amplitude range. Such predeterminable ranges may be employed by test device 302 to facilitate processing of the measured potential values output by electrocochleography measurement device 304.
The action potential of the auditory nerve is an alternating current response that is generated by the cochlear end of the VIII cranial nerve and is typically viewed as representing the summed response of the synchronous firing of thousands of auditory nerve fibers. That is, the size of the action potential reflects the number of nerve fibers which are firing simultaneously. In the absence of adverse pathology, the action potential may have a predeterminable latency range (e.g. about 1.30 milliseconds to 1.70 milliseconds). Its duration may also have a predeterminable range (e.g. about 0.80 milliseconds to 1.25 milliseconds), with a predeterminable absolute amplitude range (e.g. between about 0.60 millivolts and 3.00 millivolts). Such predeterminable ranges may be employed by test device 302 to facilitate processing of the measured potential output from electrocochleography measurement device 304. As may be appreciated, measurement signal values corresponding with the measured magnitude of the summating potential and/or action potential and/or a ratio thereof may be extracted and processed by the test device 302 to assess the interface between the implantable transducer and middle ear component or inner ear of a patient, e.g. transducer 108 in middle ear procedures.
To measure the summating potential and/or action potential, the electrocochleography measurement device 304 may comprise one or more electrodes 305. As shown in
Referring again to
When used in conjunction with a semi-implantable hearing instrument system, the test signals from the reference transmitter 308 may be provided to the external wireless audio signal link transmitter/receiver 204 (e.g. via an input port as may normally receive a jack at the end of wire 202 for audio drive signal input from the microphone 208 and SSP processor 318). In turn, the external transmitter/receiver 204 transmits the test signals to the implanted receiver/transmitter 118, which provides the test signals to the implanted signal processor 104. The implanted signal processor 104 processes and supplies the test signals to drive the implantable transducer, e.g. transducer 108 in middle ear procedures.
When used in conjunction with a fully-implantable hearing instrument system, the test signals from the reference transmitter 308 may be provided to a speaker 320 for outputting acoustic test signals. In turn, an implanted microphone 322 may subcutaneously receive the acoustic test signals and provide output test signals to the implanted signal processor 104. In turn, the implanted signal processor 104 processes and supplies the test signals to drive the implantable transducer, e.g. transducer 108 in middle ear procedures.
As noted above, the electrocochleography measurement device 304 may provide measured electrical potential values to test device 302. More particularly, the measured potential values may be provided to the signal processing unit 310. In turn, the signal processing unit 310 may process the measured potential values in accordance with preset algorithms. For example, utilizing the stored reference signal information and stored algorithms corresponding with one or more of the above noted predeterminable ranges, the signal processing unit 310 may selectively extract the summating potential and/or action potential from the measured potential values. In turn, the extracted values may be averaged and/or otherwise successively compared to determine whether and when a predetermined threshold or maximum value is reached (e.g. thereby indicating a desired interface). Concomitantly, the values obtained via processing at signal processing unit 310 may be output (e.g. graphically displayed) at a user interface 314 so that medical personnel may utilize such output in conjunction with real-time positioning of the implantable transducer, e.g. transducer 108 in middle ear procedures. For example, during an implantation procedure, medical personnel may view user interface 314 to assess whether and when an implantable middle ear transducer 108 has been located to achieve the desired interface within the middle ear of a patient. In another approach, values obtained via processing at signal processing unit 310 may be utilized in conjunction with preset algorithms to provide a control signal to a transducer positioning means (e.g. a motor or piezoelectric positioner) to realize at least partially automated positioning of the implantable transducer. Further, following implantation the noted interface may be assessed from time-to-time by comparing currently measured values with previously measured values (e.g. the previously measured values having been obtained at the time of implantation).
In a modified approach to that shown in
Referring now to
As may be appreciated, the electrical potentials obtained by electrodes 405 may be provided to the measurement device 404, and the measured values may be output to the test device 302 for processing. In this regard, predeterminable latency, durational and magnitude ranges may be utilized in one or more algorithms stored within the test device 304. Such predeterminable values and algorithms may be utilized in conjunction with processing the output of measurement device 404, thereby allowing for assessment of the implantable transducer interface with a middle ear component or inner ear of a patient in a manner analogous to that previously described.
As noted, the various features described above may be utilized for positioning an implantable transducer relative to an inner ear of a patient. In this regard, the implantable transducer, or a plurality of transducers, may be disposed on or within a flexible biocompatible carrier (e.g. comprising a bio-stable advanced polymer such as suitable silicones) that is advanced into position within the inner ear through an artificial opening of the cochlea or round window. In another approach, one or a plurality of output-side electromechanical transducers may be positioned extracochlearly. For example, the transducers may be positioned relative to an opening(s) or hole(s) defined in the bony wall bordering the cochlear so that a coupling element(s) attached to the transducer(s) may be advanced to project through the opening(s) into the lymphatic inner ear space. In yet another arrangement, an electromagnetic transducer approach may be utilized, wherein a magnet is applied to the outside of the round window membrane. In turn, an excitation device (e.g. one or more electrically conductive coils) may be positioned relative to the magnet to electromagnetically stimulate the magnet and thereby directly stimulate the inner ear.
The embodiments described above are for exemplary purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. Various adaptations, modifications and extensions of the embodiment will be apparent to those skilled in the art and are intended to be within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims which follow.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/528,728, filed on Dec. 11, 2003, and entitled “ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING A MIDDLE EAR INTERFACE OF AN IMPLANTABLE HEARING INSTRUMENT TRANSDUCER”, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3752939 | Bartz | Aug 1973 | A |
3902084 | May, Jr. | Aug 1975 | A |
3902085 | Bizzigotti | Aug 1975 | A |
4428377 | Zollner et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4441210 | Hochmair et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4944301 | Widin et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947844 | McDermott | Aug 1990 | A |
4988333 | Engebretson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5024224 | Engebretson | Jun 1991 | A |
5061282 | Jacobs | Oct 1991 | A |
5069210 | Jeutter et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5085628 | Engebretson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5217011 | Bisch | Jun 1993 | A |
5282858 | Bisch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5531774 | Schulman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553152 | Newton | Sep 1996 | A |
5554096 | Ball | Sep 1996 | A |
5569307 | Schulman et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571148 | Loeb et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5603726 | Schulman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609616 | Schulman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624376 | Ball et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5702342 | Metzler et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707338 | Adams et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5772575 | Lesinski et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776172 | Schulman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788711 | Lehner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5842967 | Kroll | Dec 1998 | A |
5857958 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876425 | Gord et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879283 | Adams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899847 | Adams et al. | May 1999 | A |
5938691 | Schulman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954628 | Kennedy | Sep 1999 | A |
5991663 | Irlicht et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993376 | Kennedy | Nov 1999 | A |
5999856 | Kennedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6001129 | Bushek et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005955 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6077215 | Leysieffer | Jun 2000 | A |
6154023 | Durand | Nov 2000 | A |
6293903 | Kasic, II et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6342035 | Kroll et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6390970 | Muller | May 2002 | B1 |
6398717 | Leysieffer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6491622 | Kasic, II et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517476 | Bedoya et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537201 | Kasic, II et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540661 | Muller | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554762 | Leysieffer | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6620094 | Miller | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6705985 | Easter et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707920 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712754 | Miller et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726618 | Miller | Apr 2004 | B1 |
20020026091 | Leysieffer | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050131272 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60528728 | Dec 2003 | US |