1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of electrospinning fibers from polymer solutions.
2. Background of the Invention
Nanofibers are useful in a variety of fields from clothing industry to military applications. For example, in the biomaterial field, there is a strong interest in developing structures based on nanofibers that provide a scaffolding for tissue growth effectively supporting living cells. In the textile field, there is a strong interest in nanofibers because the nanofibers have a high surface area per unit mass that provides light but highly wear-resistant garments. As a class, carbon nanofibers are being used for example in reinforced composites, in heat management, and in reinforcement of elastomers. Many potential applications for nanofibers are being developed as the ability to manufacture and control the chemical and physical properties improves.
Electrospray/electrospinning techniques can be used to form particles and fibers as small as one nanometer in a principal direction. The phenomenon of electrospray involves the formation of a droplet of polymer melt at an end of a needle, the electric charging of that droplet, and an expulsion of parts of the droplet because of the repulsive electric force due to the electric charges. In electrospraying, a solvent present in the parts of the droplet evaporates and small particles are formed but not fibers. The electrospinning technique is similar to the electrospray technique. However, in electrospinning and during the expulsion, fibers are formed from the liquid as the parts are expelled.
Glass fibers have existed in a sub-micron range for some time. Small micron diameter fibers have been manufactured and used commercially for air filtration applications for more than twenty years. Polymeric melt blown fibers have more recently been produced with diameters less than a micron. Several value-added nonwoven applications, including filtration, barrier fabrics, wipes, personal care, medical and pharmaceutical applications may benefit from the interesting technical properties of nanofibers and nanofiber webs. Electrospun nanofibers have a dimension less than 1 μm in one direction and preferably a dimension less than 100 nm in this direction. Nanofiber webs have typically been applied onto various substrates selected to provide appropriate mechanical properties and to provide complementary functionality to the nanofiber web. In the case of nanofiber filter media, substrates have been selected for pleating, filter fabrication, durability in use, and filter cleaning considerations.
A basic electrospinning apparatus 10 is shown in
The electrospinning process has been documented using a variety of polymers. One process of forming nanofibers is described for example in Structure Formation in Polymeric Fibers, by D. Salem, Hanser Publishers, 2001, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. By choosing a suitable polymer and solvent system, nanofibers with diameters less than 1 micron have been made.
Examples of fluids suitable for electrospraying and electrospinning include molten pitch, polymer solutions, polymer melts, polymers that are precursors to ceramics, and/or molten glassy materials. The polymers can include nylon, fluoropolymers, polyolefins, polyimides, polyesters, and other engineering polymers or textile forming polymers. A variety of fluids or materials besides those listed above have been used to make fibers including pure liquids, solutions of fibers, mixtures with small particles and biological polymers. A review and a list of the materials used to make fibers are described in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2002/0090725 A1 and 2002/0100725 A1, and in Huang et al., Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63, 2003, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Patent Appl. Publication No. 2002/0090725 A1 describes biological materials and bio-compatible materials to be electroprocessed, as well as solvents that can be used for these materials. U.S. Patent Appl. Publication No. 2002/0100725 A1 describes, besides the solvents and materials used for nanofibers, the difficulties of large scale production of the nanofibers including the volatilization of solvents in small spaces. Huang et al. give a partial list of materials/solvents that can be used to produce the nanofibers.
Despite the advances in the art, the application of nano-fibers has been limited due to the narrow range of processing conditions over which the nano-fibers can be produced. Excursions either stop the electrospining process or produce particles of electrosprayed material.
One object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and a method for improving the process window for production of electrospun fibers.
Another object is to provide an apparatus and a method which produce nano-fibers in a controlled gaseous environment.
Yet another object of the present invention is to promote the electrospinning process by introducing charge carriers into the gaseous environment into which the fibers are electospun.
Still another object of the present invention is to promote the electrospinning process by controlling the drying rate of the electrospun fibers by controlling the solvent pressure in the gaseous environment into which the fibers are electospun.
Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a novel apparatus for producing fibers. The apparatus includes an extrusion element configured to electrospin a substance from which the fibers are to be composed by an electric field extraction of the substance from a tip of the extrusion element. The apparatus includes a collector disposed from the extrusion element and configured to collect the fibers, a chamber enclosing the collector and the extrusion element, and a control mechanism configured to control a gaseous environment in which the fibers are to be electrospun.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a novel method for producing fibers. The method includes providing a substance from which the fibers are to be composed to a tip of an extrusion element, applying an electric field to the extrusion element in a direction of the tip, controlling a gaseous environment about where the fibers are to be electrospun, and electrospinning the substance from the tip of the extrusion element by an electric field extraction of the substance from the tip into the controlled gaseous environment.
A more complete appreciation of the present invention and many attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical, or corresponding parts throughout the several views, and more particularly to
The extrusion element 24 communicates with a reservoir supply 30 containing the electrospray medium such as for example the above-noted polymer solution 14. The electrospray medium of the present invention includes polymer solutions and/or melts known in the art for the extrusion of fibers including extrusions of nanofiber materials. Indeed, polymers and solvents suitable for the present invention include for example polystyrene in dimethylformamide or toluene, polycaprolactone in dimethylformamide/methylene chloride mixture (20/80 w/w), poly(ethyleneoxide) in distilled water, poly(acrylic acid) in distilled water, poly(methyl methacrylate) PMMA in acetone, cellulose acetate in acetone, polyacrylonitrile in dimethylformamide, polylactide in dichloromethane or dimethylformamide, and poly(vinylalcohol) in distilled water. Thus, in general, suitable solvents for the present invention include both organic and inorganic solvents in which polymers can be dissolved.
The electrospray medium, upon extrusion from the extrusion element 24, is guided along a direction of an electric field 32 directed toward the collector 28. A pump (not shown) maintains a flow rate of the electrospray substance to the extrusion element 24 at a desired value depending on capillary diameter and length of the extrusion element 24, and depending on a viscosity of the electrospray substance. A filter can be used to filter out impurities and/or particles having a dimension larger than a predetermined dimension of the inner diameter of the extrusion element 24. The flow rate through the extrusion element 24 should be balanced with the electric field strength of the electric field 32 so that a droplet shape exiting a tip of the extrusion element 24 is maintained constant. Using the Hagen-Poisseuille law, for example, a pressure drop through a capillary having an inner diameter of 100 μm and a length of about 1 cm is approximately 100−700 kPa for a flow rate of 1 ml/hr depending somewhat on the exact value of viscosity of the electrospray medium.
A high voltage source 34 is provided to maintain the extrusion element 24 at a high voltage. The collector 28 is placed preferably 1 to 100 cm away from the tip of the extrusion element 24. The collector 28 can be a plate or a screen. Typically, an electric field strength between 2,000 and 400,000 V/m is established by the high voltage source 34. The high voltage source 34 is preferably a DC source, such as for example Bertan Model 105-20R (Bertan, Valhalla, N.Y.) or for example Gamma High Voltage Research Model ES30P (Gamma High Voltage Research Inc., Ormond Beach, Fla.). Typically, the collector 28 is grounded, and the fibers 26 produced by extrospinning from the extrusion elements 24 are directed by the electric field 32 toward the collector 28. As schematically shown in
U.S. Ser. No. 10/819,916, entitled “Electrospinning of Polymer Nanofibers Using a Rotating Spray Head,” whose contents were incorporated by reference, describe that the rotational speed of a spray head produces a fiber collection with preferential orientations. For example, a rotatable spray head when spun at high angular speeds increases a preferred orientation of the deposited fibers. Indeed,
By rotating the spray head, a centrifugal force exists on the electrospun fibers aiding in the development of a fiber collection having a preferred orientation. In another embodiment, the collector can be rotated alone or in an opposite fashion to the spray head.
In this embodiment, the collector can be a conveyor configured to convey a belt in an opposite direction to the tip of a stationary or a counter-rotating extrusion element. The conveyor by translating the belt circumferentially about the spray head can produce on the belt deposited oriented fibers. In the present invention, rotation of the collector at the angular speed given previously for the spray head yields oriented fibers even if the spray head is stationary. In this case, the collector rotates or otherwise travels in a circumferential direction to collect the oriented fibers, and by making multiple passes permits a fiber collection to be deposited.
The distance between the tip of the extrusion element 24 and the collector 28 is determined based on a balance of a few factors such as for example a time for the solvent evaporation rate, the electric field strength, and a distance/time sufficient for a reduction of the fiber diameter. These factors and their determination are similar in the present invention to those in conventional electrospinning. However, the present inventors have discovered that a rapid evaporation of the solvents results in larger than nm-size fiber diameters.
Further, the differences in fluid properties of the polymer solutions utilized in electrospraying and those utilized in electrospraying, such as for example differences in conductivity, viscosity and surface tension, result in quite different gaseous environments about electrospraying and electrospinning apparatuses. For example, in the electrospray process, a fluid jet is expelled from a capillary at high DC potential and immediately breaks into droplets. The droplets may shatter when the evaporation causes the force of the surface charge to exceed the force of the surface tension (Rayleigh limit). Electrosprayed droplets or droplet residues migrate to a collection (i.e., typically grounded) surface by electrostatic attraction. Meanwhile, in electrospinning, the highly viscous fluid utilized is pulled (i.e., extracted) as a continuous unit in an intact jet because of the inter-fluid attraction, and is stretched as the pulled fiber dries and undergoes the instabilities described below. The drying and expulsion process reduces the fiber diameter by at least 1000 times. In electrospinning, the present invention recognizes that the complexities of the process are influenced by the gaseous atmospheres surrounding the pulled fiber, especially when polymer solutions with relatively low viscosities and solids content are to be used to make nanofibers (i.e., less than 100 nm in diameter).
With reference to
A distinctive feature observable at the tip is referred to in the art as a Taylor's cone 44. As the liquid jet 42 dries, the charge per specific area increases. Often within 2 or 3 centimeters from the tip of the capillary, the drying liquid jet becomes electrically unstable in region referred to as a Rayleigh instability region 46. The liquid jet 42 while continuing to dry fluctuates rapidly stretching the fiber 26 to reduce the charge density as a function of the surface area on the fiber.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the electrical properties of the gaseous environment about the chamber 22 are controlled to improve the process parameter space for electrospinning. For example, electronegative gases impact the electrospinning process. While carbon dioxide has been utilized in electrospraying to generate particles and droplets of material, no effects prior to the present work have been shown for the utilization of electronegative gases in an electrospinning environment. Indeed, the nature of electrospinning in which liberal solvent evaporation occurs in the environment about the extrusion elements and especially at the liquid droplet at the tip of the extrusion element would suggest that the addition of electronegative gasses would not influence the properties of the spun fibers. However, the present inventors have discovered that the introduction into the gaseous environment of electronegative gases (e.g., carbon dioxide, sulfur hexafluoride, and freons, and gas mixtures including vapor concentration of solvents) improves the parameter space available for electrospinning fibers. Suitable electronegative gases for the present invention include CO2, CO, SF6, CF4, N2O, CCl4, CCl3F, CCl2F2 and other halogenerated gases.
By modifying the electrical properties of the gaseous environment about the extrusion element 24, the present invention permits increases in the applied voltage and improved pulling of the liquid jet 42 from the tip of the extrusion element 24. In particular, injection of electronegative gases appears to reduce the onset of a corona discharge (which would disrupt the electrospinning process) around the extrusion element tip, thus permitting operation at higher voltages enhancing the electrostatic force. Further, according to the present invention, injection of electronegative gases and as well as charge carriers reduces the probability of bleeding-off charge in the Rayleigh instability region 46, thereby enhancing the stretching and drawing of the fiber under the processing conditions.
As illustrative of the electrospinning process of the present invention, the following non-limiting example is given to illustrate selection of the polymer, solvent, a gap distance between a tip of the extrusion element and the collection surface, solvent pump rate, and addition of electronegative gases:
a polystyrene solution of a molecular weight of 350 kg/mol,
a solvent of dimethylformamide DMF,
an extrusion element tip diameter of 1000 μm,
an A1 plate collector,
˜0.5 ml/hr pump rate providing the polymer solution,
an electronegative gas flow of CO2 at 8 lpm,
an electric field strength of 2 KV/cm,
and
a gap distance between the tip of the extrusion element and the collector of 17.5 cm.
With these conditions as a baseline example, a decreased fiber size can be obtained according to the present invention, by increasing the molecular weight of the polymer solution to 1000 kg/mol, and/or introducing a more electronegative gas (such as for example Freon), and/or increasing gas flowrate to for example 20 lpm, and/or decreasing tip diameter to 150 μm (e.g. as with a Teflon tip). With most polymer solutions utilized in the present invention, the presence of CO2 gas allowed electrospinning over a wide range of applied voltages and solution concentrations compared to spinning in presence of nitrogen gas. Thus, the gaseous environment surrounding the extrusion elements during electrospinning influences the quality of the fibers produced.
Further, blending gases with different electrical properties can be used to improve the processing window.
One example of a blended gas includes CO2 (at 4 lpm) blended with Argon (at 4 lpm). Other examples of blended gases suitable for the present invention include, but are not limited to, CO2 (4 lpm) with Freon (4 lpm), CO2 (4 lpm) with Nitrogen (4 lpm), CO2 (4 lpm) with Air (4 lpm), CO2 (7 lpm) with Argon (1 lpm), CO2 (1 lpm) with Argon (7 lpm).
As shown in
The present inventors have also discovered that the electrospinning process is affected by introducing charge carriers such as positive or negative ions, and energetic particles.
Similarly, the present inventors have discovered that exposure of the chamber 22 to a radioisotope, such as for example Po 210 (a 500 microcurie source) available from NRD LLC., Grand Island, N.Y. 14072, affects the electrospinning process and in certain circumstances can even stop the electrospinning process. Accordingly, in one embodiment of the present invention as shown in
Further, the present inventors have discovered that retarding the drying rate is advantageous because the longer the residence time of the fiber in the region of instability the lower the electric field strength can be while still prolonging the stretching, and consequently improving the processing space for production of nanofibers. The height of the chamber 22 and the separation distance between a tip of the extrusion element 24 and the collector 28 are, according to the present invention, designed to be compatible with the drying rate of the fiber. The drying rate for an electrospun fiber during the electrospining process can be adjusted by altering the partial pressure of the liquid vapor in the gas surrounding the fiber.
For instance, when a solvent such as methylene chloride or a blend of solvents is used to dissolve the polymer, the rate of evaporation of the solvent will depend on the vapor pressure gradient between the fiber and the surrounding gas. The rate of evaporation of the solvent can be controlled by altering the concentration of a solvent vapor in the gas. The rate of evaporation also affects the Rayleigh instability. Additionally, the electrical properties of the solvent (in the gas phase) influence the electrospinning process. As shown in
For temperature ranges from ambient to approximately 10° C. below the boiling point of the solvent, the following solvents are suitable:
Dimethylformamide: ambient to ˜143° C.
Methylene chloride: ambient to ˜30° C.
Water: ambient to ˜100° C.
Acetone: ambient to ˜46° C.
Solvent partial pressures can vary from near zero to saturation vapor pressure. Since saturation vapor pressure increases with temperature, higher partial pressures can be obtained at higher temperatures. Quantities of solvent in the pool vary with the size of the chamber and vary with the removal rate by the vent stream. For a chamber of about 35 liters, a solvent pool of a volume of approximately 200 ml can be used. Hence a temperature controller 51 as shown in
Hence, the present invention utilizes a variety of control mechanisms to control the gaseous environment in which the fibers are being electrospun for example to alter the electrical resistance of the environment or to control the drying rate of the electrospun fibers in the gaseous environment. The various control mechanisms include for example the afore-mentioned temperature controllers to control a temperature of a liquid in a vapor pool exposed to the gaseous environment, flow controllers to control a flow rate of an electronegative gas into the gaseous environment, extraction elements configured to control an injection rate of ions introduced into the gaseous environment, and shutters to control a flux of energetic particles into the gaseous environment. Other mechanisms known in the art for controlling the introduction of such species into a gaseous environment would also be suitable for the present invention.
While the effect of controlling the environment about an electrospinning extrusion element has been illustrated by reference to
Additionally, control of the gaseous environment in one embodiment of the present invention while improving the process window for electrospining also homogenizes the gaseous environment in which the fibers are being drawn and dried. As such, the present invention provides apparatuses and methods by which fibers (and especially nanofibers) can more uniformly develop and thus be produced with a more uniform diameter size and distribution than that which would be expected in conventional electrospinning equipment with uncontrolled atmospheres.
Thus, as depicted in
In step 606, at least one of an electronegative gas, ions, and energetic particles are injected into the gaseous environment. Alternatively or in addition, electronegative gases such as CO2, CO, SF6, CF4, N2O, CCl4, CCl3F, and C2 Cl2 F2, or mixtures thereof can be injected into the gaseous environment. When injecting ions, the ions can be generated in one region of the chamber 22 and injected into the gaseous environment. The injected ions are preferably injected into a Rayleigh instability region downstream from the extrusion element.
Further in step 606, the gaseous environment about where the fibers are to be electrospun can be controlled by introducing a vapor of a solvent into the chamber. The vapor can be supplied by exposing the chamber to a vapor pool of a liquid, including for example vapor pools of dimethyl formamide, methylene chloride, acetone, and water.
In step 608, the method preferably electrospins the substance in an electric field strength of 2,000-400,000 V/m. The electrospinning can produce either fibers or nanofibers.
The fibers and nanofibers produced by the present invention include, but are not limited to, acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymer, cellulose, cellulose acetate, chitosan, collagen, DNA, fibrinogen, fibronectin, nylon, poly(acrylic acid), poly(chloro styrene), poly(dimethyl siloxane), poly(ether imide), poly(ether sulfone), poly(ethyl acrylate), poly(ethyl vinyl acetate), poly(ethyl-co-vinyl acetate), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid), poly(methacrylic acid) salt, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(methyl styrene), poly(styrene sulfonic acid) salt, poly(styrene sulfonyl fluoride), poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile), poly(styrene-co-butadiene), poly(styrene-co-divinyl benzene), poly(vinyl acetate), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinyl chloride), poly(vinylidene fluoride), polyacrylamide, polyacrylonitrile, polyamide, polyaniline, polybenzimidazole, polycaprolactone, polycarbonate, poly(dimethylsiloxane-co-polyethyleneoxide), poly(etheretherketone), polyethylene, polyethyleneimine, polyimide, polyisoprene, polylactide, polypropylene, polystyrene, polysulfone, polyurethane, poly(vinylpyrrolidone), proteins, SEBS copolymer, silk, and styrene/isoprene copolymer.
Additionally, polymer blends can also be produced as long as the two or more polymers are soluble in a common solvent. A few examples would be: poly(vinylidene fluoride)-blend-poly(methyl methacrylate), polystyrene-blend-poly(vinylmethylether), poly(methyl methacrylate)-blend-poly(ethyleneoxide), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate)-blend poly(vinylpyrrolidone), poly(hydroxybutyrate)-blend-poly(ethylene oxide), protein blend-polyethyleneoxide, polylactide-blend-polyvinylpyrrolidone, polystyrene-blend-polyester, polyester-blend-poly(hyroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(ethylene oxide)-blend poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxystyrene)-blend-poly(ethylene oxide)).
By post treatment annealing, carbon fibers can be obtained from the electrospun polymer fibers.
Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/935,967, (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,407) filed Nov. 6, 2007, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 10/819,945, filed Apr. 8, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,297,305), the entire contents of both applications are incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/819,916, filed on Apr. 8, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,134,857), entitled “Electrospinning of Fibers Using a Rotating Spray Head,” the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/819,942, filed on Apr. 8, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,762,801), entitled “Electrospray/electrospinning Apparatus and Method,” the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The U.S. Government, by the following contract, may have a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms, as provided for by the terms of DARPA Contract No. 972-01-C-0058.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
705691 | Morton | Jul 1902 | A |
1975504 | Formhals | Oct 1934 | A |
2048651 | Norton | Jul 1936 | A |
2160962 | Formhals | Jun 1939 | A |
2168027 | Gladding | Aug 1939 | A |
2187306 | Formhals | Jan 1940 | A |
2265742 | Norton, Jr. et al. | Dec 1941 | A |
2323025 | Formhals | Jun 1943 | A |
2338570 | Childs | Jan 1944 | A |
2349950 | Formhals | May 1944 | A |
2810426 | Till et al. | Oct 1957 | A |
3280229 | Simons | Oct 1966 | A |
3475198 | Drum | Oct 1969 | A |
3490115 | Owens et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3670486 | Murray, Jr. | Jun 1972 | A |
3689608 | Hollberg et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3901012 | Safar | Aug 1975 | A |
3994258 | Simm | Nov 1976 | A |
4044404 | Martin et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4127706 | Martin et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4230650 | Guignard | Oct 1980 | A |
4323525 | Bornat | Apr 1982 | A |
4345414 | Bornat et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4468922 | McCrady et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4486365 | Kliemann et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4552707 | How | Nov 1985 | A |
4618524 | Groitzsch et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4689186 | Bornat | Aug 1987 | A |
4878908 | Martin et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4965110 | Berry | Oct 1990 | A |
5024789 | Berry | Jun 1991 | A |
5088807 | Waters et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5522879 | Scopelianos | Jun 1996 | A |
5866217 | Stenoien et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6099960 | Tennent et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106913 | Scardino et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110590 | Zarkoob et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6265333 | Dzenis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265466 | Glatkowski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6306424 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308509 | Scardino et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6375886 | Angadjivand et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382526 | Reneker et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395046 | Emig et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6486379 | Chen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492574 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6520425 | Reneker | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6554881 | Healey | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558422 | Baker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6667099 | Greiner et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7592277 | Andrady et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7762801 | Andrady et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7789930 | Ensor et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7999455 | Davis et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8052932 | Han et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010045547 | Senecal et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007869 | Pui et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020042128 | Bowlin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020084178 | Dubson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090725 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100725 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122840 | Lee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124953 | Sennett et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128680 | Pavlovic | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150669 | Pui et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173213 | Chu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175449 | Chu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030017208 | Ignatious et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030054035 | Chu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030100944 | Laksin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106294 | Chung et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030213218 | Dubson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215624 | Layman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040013819 | Hou et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040053780 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070118 | Czado | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060119015 | Wehrspohn et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080200975 | Dubson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100031617 | Ensor et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110174158 | Walls et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 217 107 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1 226 795 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 277 857 | Jan 2003 | EP |
2002-201559 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-249966 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO 9803267 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9856894 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 0022207 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0109414 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0115754 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0126610 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0126702 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0127365 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0127368 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0151690 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0168228 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0174431 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0189022 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0189023 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0216680 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0234986 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 0249535 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0249536 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0249678 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0250346 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-0250346 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02072937 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02074189 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02074191 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02092339 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02092888 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03004735 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03076702 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03080905 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004074559 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action issued May 24, 2012, in Patent Application No. 201010003786.4 (English translation only). |
Office Action issued Jul. 22, 2011 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201010003786.4 (English translation only). |
European Search Report issued Jun. 29, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 11163585.0. |
Li D. et al., “Electrospinning of Polymeric and Ceramic Nanofibers as Uniaxially Aligned Arrays”, Nano Letters, ACS, Washington, DC, vol. 3 No. 8, Aug. 1, 2003, pp. 1167-1171. |
Office Action issued Feb. 5, 2013 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201010003786.4 (English-language translation only). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/211,940, filed Aug. 17, 2011, Ensor, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/243,257, filed Sep. 23, 2011, Han, et al. |
Ravindran Periasamy, et al. “Generation of Uniformly Sized, Charged Particles in a Vacuum”, Aerosol Science and Technology (1991), pp. 256-265. |
Y.M. Shin, et al. “Experimental Chracterization of Electrospinning: The Electrically Forced Jet and Instabilites”, Polymer 42 (2001), pp. 9955-9967. |
Office Action issued Sep. 4, 2013 in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201010003786. (English translation only). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120077014 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10819945 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11935967 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11935967 | Nov 2007 | US |
Child | 13243400 | US |