This invention relates to air cleaners, and particularly to electrostatic air cleaners.
Various electrostatic air cleaner designs are known. One significant advantage of electrostatic air cleaners is the possibility of operating at a lower pressure drop compared to conventional mechanical filter air cleaners. A large pressure drop requires a powerful fan to provide the desired air flow rate, which causes noisy operation of the air cleaner.
A conventional electrostatic air cleaner may have a charging stage for charging particles in the air stream through the filter and a dust precipitation stage. The pressure drop across the air cleaner can be arranged to be near zero. The charging stage is typically a high voltage ionizer and may be arranged as a series of corona discharge electrodes (most often in the form of fine wires) sandwiched between grounded plates. Corona discharge requires sufficient voltage and power to ionize air molecules in the vicinity of the corona discharge electrodes. The corona electrodes rapidly discharge ions of one polarity that drift according to an electric field towards the grounded plates. Particles entrained in the air stream collide with these drifting ions.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,330,559 describes an electrostatic air cleaner employing a corona discharge charging stage. An ionizer is placed on the inlet side of an electrostatic air cleaning apparatus with alternating ground plates and high voltage discharge electrodes placed side-by-side.
A problem with electrostatic air cleaners of this kind is the corona discharge power consumption and by-product (like Ozone) generation.
U.S. Patent Application No. 2015/0323217 shows an electronic air cleaner with an ionizing stage at the inlet end of the cleaner. The ionizing stage has alternating corona electrodes and exciting electrodes, side-by-side. A similar configuration is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,526,402.
In conventional electrostatic air cleaners, ions flow from the corona discharge electrodes (thin wires) to the second array. Typically, a majority of the ions reach the second array (usually grounded) before they collide with the airborne particles. These ions are wasted.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,171 shows an electrostatic air cleaner with a charging stage having, in the direction of air flow, a first row of equally spaced parallel thick grounded wires in a plane perpendicular to the air flow, a row of equally-spaced parallel thin corona wires offset from the first row of grounded wires in a plane perpendicular to the air flow direction. Next, there is a second row of equally-spaced parallel thin wires which are under high voltage potential aligned with thick grounded wires in the third row. The grounded wires in the first and third rows may have chromium-nickel wires having diameter of approximately 1.0 mm. Alternatively, the first and third arrays of grounded wires may each be obtained by chemical etching of a metal plate, in which case the wires could, for example, be stainless steel and have a thickness of at least 0.5 mm to enable etching from a solid plate.
Two arrays of grounded wires may be mounted as close together as practical, for example, 20 mm, the spacing between adjacent grounded wires may be approximately 4 mm.
The corona wires are described as having the smallest possible diameter (a diameter of approximately 0.05 mm is preferred) since any reduction in the diameter below this level results in mechanical weakness of the wires. The corona wires may be made from tungsten.
The corona wires may be set off from the grounded wires with respect to the direction of air flow so that the air stream crosses the electric field lines which are defined between the corona wires and the grounded wires. Uniform dust particle charging may be achieved when the orientation of the electric field is perpendicular to the air flow direction.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,171 further discloses that the spacing between the corona wires (8 mm) is twice the spacing between the grounded wires (4 mm).
U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,171 shows a precipitation stage with a series of alternated grounded plates and high voltage plates extending parallel to each other and parallel to the direction of air flow through the air cleaner. In this way, the precipitation stage introduces only a negligible pressure drop. The plates in the precipitation stage may have a thickness of approximately 0.5 mm. The voltage supplied to the high voltage plates, and the separation between adjacent plates defines the electric field strength between the plates. The same voltage source may be used for the high voltage plates as for the corona wires, and the spacing between adjacent plates may be approximately 2 mm.
In the configuration shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,171 many of the ions are emitted from the corona electrodes travel toward the precipitation stage. Many of those ions meet the grounded third raw and settle on the grounded thick wires. This reduces the number of ions that escape the charging stage and take part in charging dust particles. The cleaning efficiency of the electrostatic air cleaner is therefore reduced.
An electrostatic precipitator (ESP) is a filtration device that removes particles, like dust and smoke, from a flowing gas using the force of an induced electrostatic charge minimally impeding the flow of gases through the device. Electrostatic precipitators may be used as air filters, purifiers, and/or conditioners. An electrostatic precipitator may have several types of electrodes. One type of electrode is a corona electrode. Another type may be collecting electrodes. There may be other types of electrodes such as an exciting electrode and a repelling electrodes. Each type of electrode referred to herein may be a single electrode or plural electrodes or an electrode array. Typically, electrodes of the same type of kept at the same potential. The exciting electrode may be a single piece structure or more than one piece electrically connected to each other. The corona electrodes may be a corona wire routed across the air flow path one time or more than one time and an electrostatic device may have one corona wire or multiple corona wires routed across an airflow path and electrically connected to each other. The term “electrode array” is intended to include one or more electrodes of the same type. Electrode arrays may be mounted such that one or more electrodes arrays may be removable to facilitate cleaning and/or replacement.
According to the advantageous features of the present invention, an air cleaner may remove particles contained in an air stream directed through an air cleaner. The air cleaner may include a charging stage for charging particles in the air stream and a precipitation stage for capturing charged particles. It is an object to provide a high ion density downstream of ionization area to increase the probability that particles in the air stream will be charged. The charging stage may have a first array of substantially parallel thin wires and a second array may be made of electrically conductive air penetrable mesh. The second array may be located upstream of the first array and may be electrically grounded. A corona discharge takes place when sufficient voltage is applied between the first and second arrays. The first array emits ions that are electrically attracted to the second array and move toward the second array. The system may have an airflow induced by a fan in the opposite direction of the ions movement. Advantageously the air flow induced by the fan may be of a sufficient magnitude to divert emitted ions away from the second array and increase concentration of ions downstream of the charging stage in order to increase the probability of an ion colliding with an airborne particle and settling on a downstream collector.
As a result of the air flow induced by the fan a majority of the ions do not reach the second array. These ions flow from the first array toward the precipitation stage. On the way to the precipitation stage, the ions settle on the dust particles and charge them. Charged particles enter the precipitation stage and settle on the collecting electrodes. The precipitation stage usually has two arrays of parallel plates (electrodes). The first array of precipitation stage are collecting electrodes and these plates are usually grounded. The second array of electrodes are the repelling electrodes and they are usually under the same voltage polarity as the first array (usually positive).
An electrostatic air cleaner may have an ionizing stage including a first electrode array located in the airflow path downstream from the second electrode array, wherein the first electrode array may include one or more substantially parallel thin wires. A precipitation stage may be located in the airflow path downstream of the ionizing stage and having at least a collecting electrode array. The second electrode array defines a second electrode array plane and said second electrode array plane is orthogonal to the airflow path. A high voltage power supply may be connected between the first electrode array and the second electrode array of the ionizing stage with an output electrical potential between a corona onset voltage and a breakdown voltage of the first electrode array and the second electrode array. The electrode configuration may be such that an ion concentration downstream of the ionizing stage is equal or larger than the ion concentration between the second electrode array and the first electrode array when under the influence of an air mover. The first electrode array may be located at a first distance from the second electrode array. The precipitation stage is located at a distance from said second electrode array that is at least 1.5 times greater than the first distance. The second electrode array of the ionizing stage may be connected to a power supply at an electrical potential equal to the ground or to a safe electrical potential for humans, for instance less than 12 V. The first electrode array is normally under positive electrical potential relative to the second electrode array.
Various objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, along with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like components.
Moreover, the above objects and advantages of the invention are illustrative, and not exhaustive, of those that can be achieved by the invention. Thus, these and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description herein, both as embodied herein and as modified in view of any variations which will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
The invention will now be described by way of example, with reference to and as shown in the accompanying drawings.
Before the present invention is described in further detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.
Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in the smaller ranges is also encompassed within the invention, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the invention.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, a limited number of the exemplary methods and materials are described herein.
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited. The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates, which may need to be independently confirmed.
A fan (not shown) may also be part of the air cleaner 100 and may blow air in the direction depicted by the arrow 106.
The precipitation stage may include one or more collecting electrodes 104 and one or more repelling electrodes 105. Usually the collecting electrodes 104 are grounded and the repelling electrodes 105 are under high voltage potential of the same polarity as the voltage applied to the first array 102.
Any electrical potential may be applied to each of these electrodes providing that the potential difference between them is substantial enough to draw charged particles away from the repelling electrodes 105 toward the collecting electrodes 104. The repelling electrodes 105 are usually under positive electrical potential, for example, in the range from 5 kV to 15 kV. The repelling electrodes 105 may be connected to the first array 102 directly or via an electrical resistor (not shown).
Ions emitted from the first array 102 travel, under the influence of an air mover such as a fan, toward the precipitation stage and settle on the dust particles in the air. These particles become electrically charged and enter the area between the collecting 104 and repelling 105 electrodes.
The more ions are in the air between the first array 102 and the precipitation stage, the greater the chances that they encounter dust particles and charge them.
In an experiment comparing ion counts at an output of a precipitator where the collector stage air velocity and inlet particle count was held constant the respective ion counts at the outlet are given for two charging stage configurations. The first charging stage configuration had an electrode geometry as shown in
The second charging stage configuration had an electrode geometry corresponding to U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,171, specifically a first row of equally-spaced parallel grounded wires having a spacing of 10 mm per wire followed by a row of equally-spaced parallel corona wires. The row of corona wires was arranged 20 mm from the first row of grounded wires. The spacing between corona wires was 20 mm and the corona wires were offset from the first row of grounded wires. A second row of ground wires was spaced 20 mm from the row of corona wires. The second row of ground wires were parallel and equally-spaced with 15 mm between each.
All grounded wires were of the diameter equal to 2 mm and all corona wires were of the diameter 0.1 mm.
The experiment was performed using corona voltages as shown in each case with an output ion count downstream of the ionizing stage. Table 1 shows the results using the second electrode configuration corresponding to the configuration geometry shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,171.
Table 2 shows the results using the first electrode configuration described above.
The ion count in Table 1 is dramatically lower than the ion count shown in Table 2. Table 1 shows that the maximum ion count at the output at the ionizer was only about 47,000 ions per cubic centimeter.
The collecting efficiency of the electrostatic air cleaner shown in Table 1 is measured at a level between 80-85% for the particles in the range between 0.3-5 microns.
The experimental results shown in Table 2 amount to approximately a 5-fold increase in the number of ions at the output of the ionizer. At a corona voltage of 20 kV the ion count was more than 200,000 per cubic centimeter.
The collecting efficiency of the electrostatic air cleaner shown in the Table 2 is measured at a level above 99% for the particles in the range between 0.3-5 microns.
The techniques, processes and apparatus described may be utilized to control operation of any device and conserve use of resources based on conditions detected or applicable to the device.
The invention is described in detail with respect to preferred embodiments, and it will now be apparent from the foregoing to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects, and the invention, therefore, as defined in the claims, is intended to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Thus, specific apparatus for and methods of the present invention have been disclosed. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the disclosure. Moreover, in interpreting the disclosure, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1650097 | Schmidt | Nov 1927 | A |
1931436 | Walther | Oct 1933 | A |
1957560 | Thompson | May 1934 | A |
2142129 | Wilhelm et al. | Jan 1939 | A |
2271597 | Lionel | Feb 1942 | A |
2526402 | Palmer | Oct 1950 | A |
2771963 | Warren | Nov 1956 | A |
2997130 | Nodolf | Aug 1961 | A |
3040497 | Schwab | Jun 1962 | A |
3157479 | Boles | Nov 1964 | A |
3504482 | Goettl | Apr 1970 | A |
3518462 | Thomas | Jun 1970 | A |
3710588 | Martinez | Jan 1973 | A |
3816980 | Schwab | Jun 1974 | A |
3831351 | Gibbs et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3959715 | Canning | May 1976 | A |
3960505 | Marks | Jun 1976 | A |
4057405 | Cheney et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4077785 | Hartshorn | Mar 1978 | A |
4098591 | Diepenbroek et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4124359 | Geller | Nov 1978 | A |
4160202 | James et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4166729 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4177047 | Goland | Dec 1979 | A |
4178156 | Tashiro et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4231766 | Spurgin | Nov 1980 | A |
4246010 | Honacker | Jan 1981 | A |
4259093 | Vlastos et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4259707 | Penney | Mar 1981 | A |
4264343 | Natarajan et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4290003 | Lanese | Sep 1981 | A |
4390830 | Laugesen | Jun 1983 | A |
4390831 | Byrd et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4433281 | Herklotz et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4486704 | Gustafsson et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4490159 | Matts | Dec 1984 | A |
4516991 | Kawashima | May 1985 | A |
4549887 | Joannou | Oct 1985 | A |
4604112 | Ciliberti et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4613346 | Reyes et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4643745 | Sakakibara et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4673416 | Sakakibara et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689056 | Noguchi | Aug 1987 | A |
4719535 | Zhenjun et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4904283 | Hovis et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4980796 | Huggins | Dec 1990 | A |
5035728 | Fang | Jul 1991 | A |
5068811 | Johnston et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5108470 | Pick | Apr 1992 | A |
5123524 | Lapeyre | Jun 1992 | A |
5251171 | Yamauchi | Oct 1993 | A |
5254155 | Mensi | Oct 1993 | A |
5330559 | Cheney et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332485 | Thompson | Jul 1994 | A |
5332562 | Kersey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336299 | Savell | Aug 1994 | A |
5395430 | Lundgren et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5466279 | Hattori et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5526402 | Dent et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5573577 | Joannou | Nov 1996 | A |
5628818 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5679121 | Kim | Oct 1997 | A |
5689177 | Nielsen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5707428 | Feldman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5807425 | Gibbs | Sep 1998 | A |
5827407 | Wang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5846302 | Putro | Dec 1998 | A |
5914454 | Imbaro et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922111 | Omi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5993521 | Loreth | Nov 1999 | A |
6129781 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187271 | Lee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6245131 | Rippelmeyer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251171 | Marra | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6504308 | Krichtafovitch | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527834 | Jorder et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6635106 | Katou et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656248 | Ilmasti | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660061 | Josephson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6764533 | Lobiondo | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790259 | Rittri et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805732 | Billiotte et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6831271 | Guevremont et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6888314 | Krichtafovitch et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6937455 | Krichtafovitch | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6984987 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008469 | Vetter et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019244 | Weaver | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7048780 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7112238 | Joannou | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7150780 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163572 | Liang | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7182805 | Reaves | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7264659 | Moshenrose | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7316735 | Tomimatsu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332019 | Bias et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351274 | Helt et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7393385 | Coffey et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7431755 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7438743 | Strauss | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452410 | Bergeron et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7513933 | Coppom et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531027 | Tepper et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531028 | Mello et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534288 | Bromberg | May 2009 | B2 |
7553353 | Lepage | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569100 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582144 | Krigmont | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7582145 | Krigmont | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594958 | Krichtafovitch | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597750 | Krigmont | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7608135 | Mello et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7652431 | Krichtafovitch | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7717980 | Tepper et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736418 | Graβ | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753994 | Motegi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758675 | Naito et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780761 | Gu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815719 | McKinney et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7833322 | Botvinnik et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857884 | Bohlen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857890 | Paterson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7896957 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914604 | Mello et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7942952 | Gale | May 2011 | B2 |
7998255 | Blum | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8043412 | Carlson | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049426 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092768 | Miller et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8211208 | Chan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241396 | Ursem et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8241397 | Gu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8277541 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8278797 | Sashida | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8349052 | Noh et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357233 | Chan | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366813 | Tokuda et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388900 | Benedek et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8404020 | Farmer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414687 | Li | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8454733 | Tanaka | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460433 | Gefter et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8492733 | Klochkov et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8506674 | Brown-Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8551228 | Chan | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574345 | Ursem et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597415 | Noh | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608826 | Al-Hamouz | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608838 | Wong et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623116 | Karlsson | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8624476 | Sekoguchi | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8663362 | Hagan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690996 | Jl | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702848 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8721775 | Chesebrough | May 2014 | B2 |
8736043 | Konno et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8741018 | Belcher et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760830 | Ikeda | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8845782 | Metteer | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873215 | Waddell | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8889079 | Zahedi | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8920537 | Seike | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8999040 | Johansson | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9028588 | Hess | May 2015 | B2 |
9089849 | Gu et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9216233 | Ota et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9308537 | Krichtafovitch | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9308538 | Genereux et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9327293 | McKinney et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9387487 | McGrath | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9441845 | Waddell | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9457118 | Ota et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9488382 | Krichtafovitch | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9550189 | Oertmann | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9630186 | Back | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9797864 | McKinney | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20020134932 | Guevremont et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152890 | Leiser | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020190658 | Lee | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005824 | Katou et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030131727 | Fissan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040023411 | Fenn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040105802 | Duncan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060177356 | Miller | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060185511 | Tepper | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060278082 | Tomimatsu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286017 | Hakka | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070148061 | Lau et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080030920 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080092743 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080121106 | Tepper et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080282772 | Petinarides | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090114090 | Gu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090235817 | Gu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235821 | Mochizuki et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090320426 | Braunecker et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100051709 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100095848 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100229724 | Tokuda et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243885 | Tepper et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110084611 | Schlitz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110286892 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120073436 | Li | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130047857 | Bohlen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047858 | Bohlen et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047859 | Bohlen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130074690 | Tomimatsu et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130220128 | Gu et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130284025 | Johansson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140150659 | McGrath | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174294 | Krichtafovitch | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140345463 | Urata et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140373717 | Wang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150013541 | Vandenbelt et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150059580 | Clement et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150246595 | Forejt et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260147 | Schenk et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150323217 | Krichtafovitch | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150343454 | Tyburk | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013013 | Waddell | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160184834 | Genereux et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160236205 | Seeley et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170008008 | Umase | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170021363 | Krichtafovitch | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170354977 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170354979 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2319732 | May 1999 | CN |
1926651 | Mar 2007 | CN |
201210251 | Mar 2009 | CN |
100552854 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101657247 | Jun 2013 | CN |
103706479 | Apr 2014 | CN |
105034756 | Nov 2015 | CN |
205066003 | Mar 2016 | CN |
4114935 | Nov 1991 | DE |
0332624 | Jan 1992 | EP |
2700452 | Feb 2014 | EP |
1490315 | Nov 1977 | GB |
2010025811 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2012039826 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2013173528 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2015084112 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wen, T., Wang, H., Krichtofovich, H., Mamishev, A., Novel Electrodes of an Electrostatic Precipitator for Air Filtration, submitted to Journal of Electronics Nov. 12, 2014, Seattle, Washington. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200188929 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |