The present invention relates generally to integrated circuits and more particularly to an electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection structure utilized with such circuits.
Devices are utilized extensively in integrated circuits to protect the circuits from electrostatic discharge (ESD) events. Hereinafter these types of devices will be referred to as ESD protection structure. Besides the strength of the ESD protection structure, the most important parameter of the device is a triggering voltage (VT1) of the ESD protection structure. To describe the importance of this parameter in more detail refer now to the following discussion in conjunction with the accompanying Figures.
In a preferred embodiment the incoming ESD event is conducted to the LDNMOS device 102. To describe how the ESD protection structure operates to protect an integrated circuit, refer now to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
Typically in a 0.35 μm smart power technology, the supply voltage is 25V and the breakdown voltage of the weakest device is 43V. Hence, for this type of technology, VT1 must be between 25V and 43V in order to guarantee a proper ESD protection. The device 102 shown in
Referring to both
In case of an ESD event the inherent parasitic bipolar device of the lateral DMOS transistor will bear the brunt of the current. This bipolar transistor—comprising the NDMOS' drain as collector, body as base and source as emitter—is triggered by impact ionisation. Carriers are generated inside the NDMOS' drain region when a large voltage with respect to the body is applied to the drain contact. The generated holes will travel to the next body contact row. In
Accordingly, what is needed is an ESD protection structure in which the triggering voltage is reduced for certain applications. The ESD protection structure must be cost effective, simple to implement and adaptable to existing integrated circuits. The present invention addresses such a need.
An electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection structure is disclosed. The ESD protection structure comprises an active device. The active device includes a plurality of drains. Each of the drains has a contact row and at least one body contact row. The at least one body contact row is located on the active device in a manner to reduce the amount of voltage required for triggering the ESD protection structure.
A system and method in accordance with the present invention utilizes a LDNMOS transistor as ESD protection element with optimised substrate contacts. The ratio of substrate contact rows to drain contact rows is smaller than one (1) in order to reduce the triggering voltage of the inherent bipolar transistor.
The present invention relates generally to integrated circuits and more particularly to an electrostatic discharge protection structure utilized with such circuits. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
Applicants have discovered that the drain voltage required for snapback depends on the amount of carriers and on the distance the carriers have to travel. A larger drain voltage results in an increased amount of carriers. Therefore, the voltage drop caused by these carriers increases. A longer distance is equivalent to a larger resistance seen by the carriers. Therefore, fewer carriers and a smaller drain voltage are needed for the triggering. A system and method in accordance with the present invention utilizes a lateral DNMOS transistor as ESD protection element with contact rows that are optimized to minimize the triggering voltage of the protection structure. In a preferred embodiment the ratio of substrate contact rows to drain contact rows is smaller than one (1) in order to reduce the triggering voltage of the inherent bipolar transistor.
To describe the features of the present invention in more detail, refer now to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
The LDNMOS device in accordance with the present invention is optimized to minimize the voltage needed to protect the devices. This optimization will be described in more detail hereinafter.
Due to added resistance circuit element 911a and 911b, the voltage on node 935 becomes more positive. As the high voltage, applied to the entire circuit via VDD, increases, the hole current increases, as does the positive voltage at node 935.
The positive voltage at node 935 eventually becomes greater than the voltage at the source terminal 937 of the LDNMOS device, which forward biases parasitic diode 939, an internal part of the LDNMOS device.
Current flows from the source to ground, which limits the rate of increase of voltage on node VDD. This current flows from the drain, through the source terminal 937 to ground, and is multiplied by the current gain of the parasitic lateral bipolar device formed by the drain, body, and source diffusions of the LDNMOS device.
The TLP measurement for the improved design in accordance with the present invention is shown in
In this particular technology, an LDNMOS device will breakdown at 30V. As before mentioned in the conventional design shown in
A system and method in accordance with the present invention provides an ESD protection element with optimised substrate contacts. The ratio of substrate contact rows to drain contact rows is smaller than one (1) in order to reduce the triggering voltage of the inherent bipolar transistor.
Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, although the present invention has been described in the context of a LDNMOS device, one of ordinary skill recognizes a group of active devices such as LDNMOS or LDPMOS with all of its parasitic devices can be utilized as ESD protection structure and their use would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, the parasitic devices include, but are not limited to, drift region extension of drain, which adds resistance between parasitic drain: body N:P junction and external circuitry, body resistance as disclosed in the present application. Source to body diodes, drain to body diodes and gate capacitors to the body.
In addition other devices can be utilized external to the LDNMOS or the LDPMOS device including, but not limited to integrated diodes, or silicon rectifiers, which protect elements of the ESD protection device itself, like the gate part of the device, from destruction due to over voltage and resistors, which used in combination with the diodes, protect elements of the ESD protection circuit itself from peak transient voltages and current. Furthermore, it is understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that although for the technology described in the present application, approximately a 4:1 ratio is drain contact rows to body contact rows is optimal many other ratios could be provided and may be effective for placing the triggering voltage in a desired range. For example, the ratio could be as low as 2:1 and as great as 100:1 and their use would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4682202 | Tanizawa | Jul 1987 | A |
4853757 | Kuramitsu et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5031018 | Shirato et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5040050 | Chave | Aug 1991 | A |
5789791 | Bergemont | Aug 1998 | A |
5859456 | Efland et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5977595 | Ham | Nov 1999 | A |
6323074 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6462384 | Kwon | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6501106 | Osajima | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6552372 | Wu et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6573568 | Lin et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6614633 | Kohno | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6664599 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6682993 | Wu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6720623 | Chen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6794715 | Liu et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6815775 | Ker et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815776 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835623 | Shiau et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835627 | Whiston et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6858901 | Ker et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6898062 | Russ et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6987293 | Sakamoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7141831 | Vashchenko et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7217966 | Vashchenko et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
20020158299 | Castro Simas et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040075145 | Shbib | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040178453 | Duvvury et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050179087 | Lin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070120190 A1 | May 2007 | US |