1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection and, in particular, to ESD circuits comprising a silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) device and a metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) triggering device.
2. Description of the Related Art
Generally, to protect semiconductor chips from damage from electrostatic charge (ESD) during manufacturing, ESD protection circuits are configured between an input pad and an input stage of semiconductor chips. The ESD protection circuit remains open during normal operating mode such that the input stage and internal circuits of the semiconductor chip normally function. When the ESD occurs at an input of the ESD protection circuit, the circuit enters a short state to dissipate ESD discharge, protecting internal circuits of the semiconductor chips.
An embodiment of an electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection circuit comprises a silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) device and a metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) triggering device. The SCR device has a cathode connected to a first fixed potential and an anode. The MOS triggering device has a gate and a source connected to the first fixed potential and a drain connected to the anode. In addition, the MOS triggering device is not physically disposed in the SCR device.
An embodiment of an integrated circuit comprises the disclosed ESD protection circuit, an input pad, and an input stage. The anode of the SCR device is connected to the input pad and the input stage.
An embodiment of an integrated circuit comprises the disclosed ESD protection circuit, a core circuitry. The core circuitry is protected by the ESD protection circuit.
The invention provides an ESD protection circuit comprising a SCR device and a MOS triggering device. The MOS triggering device, not physically disposed in the SCR device and does not dominate current discharge after the SCR device is turned on in an ESD event, and thus receiving only minimal current after the SCR device is turned on, is protected from damage by ESD pulses, resulting in more robust ESD protection.
A detailed description is given in the following embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The invention can be more fully understood by reading the subsequent detailed description and examples with references made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description is of the best-contemplated mode of carrying out the invention. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention and should not be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the invention is best determined by reference to the appended claims.
In
In the ESD protection circuit 300 according to the embodiment of the invention, the MOS triggering device 320 is not in a transversal current path of the SCR device 310. After the SCR device 310 is triggered and turned on by the MOS triggering device 320, most ESD discharge current no longer flows through the MOS triggering device 320. As a result, the MOS triggering device is not damaged by ESD pulses and ESD protection is more robust.
Tables I and II show experimental results of ESD testing for applications of a conventional ESD protection circuit and an ESD protection circuit according to an embodiment of the invention. Table I shows experimental results of ESD testing for structures in
The invention provides an ESD protection circuit comprising a SCR device and a MOS triggering device. The MOS triggering device, not physically disposed in the SCR device and does not dominate current discharge after the SCR device is turned on in an ESD event, and thus receiving only minimal current after the SCR device is turned on, is protected from damage by ESD pulses, resulting in more robust ESD protection.
While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. To the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements as would be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.