Electrostatic image developing process with optimized setpoints

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6526247
  • Patent Number
    6,526,247
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 15, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 25, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates generally to processes for electrostatic image development, and setpoints that provide uniform image development. In particular, an apparatus and process having a magnetic brush that implements hard carriers and a rotating magnetic core within a shell is disclosed. The process implements one or more of the following optimum setpoints: a range of shell surface speeds that provide uniform toning density, a range of shell surface speeds that prevent toner plate-out, a skive spacing that minimizes sensitivity to variation, a magnetic core speed that minimizes sensitivity to variation, and an imaging member spacing that minimizes sensitivity to variation.
Description




BACKGROUND




The invention relates generally to processes for electrostatic image development, and setpoints that provide uniform image development.




Processes for developing electrostatic images using dry toner are well known in the art. A process that implements hard magnetic carriers and a rotating magnetic core is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,546,060 and 4,473,029. The rotating magnetic core promotes agitated flow of the toner/carrier mixture, which improves development relative to certain other development processes. In spite of such improvements, certain image artifacts still occur, some of which are the result of process setpoints. Therefore, a more robust process without image artifacts is generally desired.




SUMMARY




A process for developing electrostatic images comprising depositing a uniform toner density on an electrostatic image using a magnetic brush comprising hard magnetic carriers, a rotating shell, and a rotating plurality of magnets inside the rotating shell, without plating-out the rotating shell with toner.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

presents a side cross-sectional view of an apparatus for developing electrostatic images, according to an aspect of the present invention.





FIG. 2

presents a side schematic view of a discharged area development configuration of the

FIG. 1

apparatus with a background area passing over a magnetic brush.





FIG. 3

presents a side schematic view of a discharged area development configuration of the

FIG. 1

apparatus with an area that is being toned passing over a magnetic brush.





FIG. 4

presents a plan view of an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image.





FIG. 5

presents a plan view of

FIG. 4

electrostatic imaging member after development.





FIG. 6

presents a plot of toning density versus position for the developed image of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 7

presents a plan view of an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image.





FIG. 8

presents a plan view of

FIG. 7

electrostatic imaging member after development.





FIG. 9

presents a plot of toning density versus position for the developed image of FIG.


8


.





FIG. 10

presents a plot of core speed versus toning density.





FIG. 11

presents a plot of skive spacing versus toning density.





FIG. 12

presents a plot of electrostatic imaging member spacing relative to the magnetic brush shell versus toning density.





FIG. 13

presents a cross-sectional view of a toning station that implements the development apparatus of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 14

presents a toned image comprising a solid area followed by a half-tone or grey area.





FIG. 15

presents development process of the

FIG. 14

image, according to an aspect of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Various aspects of the invention are presented in

FIGS. 1-15

, which are not drawn to scale, and wherein like components in the numerous views are numbered alike. Referring now specifically to

FIG. 1

, an apparatus and process are presented, according to an aspect of the invention. An apparatus


10


for developing electrostatic images is presented comprising an electrostatic imaging member


12


having an electrostatic image and a magnetic brush


14


comprising a rotating shell


18


, a mixture


16


of hard magnetic carriers and toner (also referred to herein as “developer”), and a rotating plurality of magnets


20


inside the rotating shell


18


. A process for developing electrostatic images, according to an aspect of the invention, comprises depositing a uniform toner density on the electrostatic image using the magnetic brush


14


comprising hard magnetic carriers, a rotating shell


18


, and a rotating plurality of magnets


20


inside the rotating shell


18


, without plating-out the rotating shell


18


with toner. As used herein, “plate-out” refers to a condition wherein the external surface of the rotating shell


18


is coated with toner particles to the extent that the image is affected.




The magnetic brush


14


operates according to the principles described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,473,029 and 4,546,060, the contents of which are fully incorporated by reference as if set forth herein. The two-component dry developer composition of U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,060 comprises charged toner particles and oppositely charged, magnetic carrier particles, which (a) comprise a magnetic material exhibiting “hard” magnetic properties, as characterized by a coercivity of at least 300 gauss and (b) exhibit an induced magnetic moment of at least 20 EMU/gm when in an applied field of 1000 gauss, is disclosed. As described in the '060 patent, the developer is employed in combination with a magnetic applicator comprising a rotatable magnetic core and an outer, nonmagnetizable shell to develop electrostatic images. When hard magnetic carrier particles are employed, exposure to a succession of magnetic fields emanating from the rotating core applicator causes the particles to flip or turn to move into magnetic alignment in each new field. Each flip, moreover, as a consequence of both the magnetic moment of the particles and the coercivity of the magnetic material, is accompanied by a rapid circumferential step by each particle in a direction opposite the movement of the rotating core. The observed result is that the developers of the '060 flow smoothly and at a rapid rate around the shell while the core rotates in the opposite direction, thus rapidly delivering fresh toner to the photoconductor and facilitating high-volume copy and printer applications.




The electrostatic imaging member


12


of

FIGS. 1-3

is configured as a sheet-like film. However, it may be configured in other ways, such as a drum, depending upon the particular application. A film electrostatic imaging member


12


is relatively resilient, typically under tension, and a pair of backer bars


32


may be provided that hold the imaging member in a desired position relative to the shell


18


, as shown in FIG.


1


.




According to a further aspect of the invention, the process comprises moving electrostatic imaging member


12


at a member velocity


24


, and rotating the shell


18


with a shell surface velocity


26


adjacent the electrostatic imaging member


12


and co-directional with the member velocity


24


. The shell


18


and magnetic poles


20


bring the mixture


16


of hard magnetic carriers and toner into contact with the electrostatic imaging member


12


. The mixture


16


contacts that electrostatic imaging member


12


over a length indicated as L. The electrostatic imaging member is electrically grounded


22


and defines a ground plane. The surface of the electrostatic imaging member facing the shell


18


is a photoconductor that can be treated at this point in the process as an electrical insulator, the shell opposite that is grounded is an electrical conductor. Biasing the shell relative to the ground


22


with a voltage V creates an electric field that attracts toner particles to the electrostatic image with a uniform toner density, the electric field being a maximum where the shell


18


is adjacent to the electrostatic imaging member


12


. According to an aspect of the invention, toner plate-out is avoided by the electric field being a maximum where the shell


18


is adjacent to the electrostatic imaging member


12


, and by the shell surface velocity


26


being greater than or equal to a minimum shell surface velocity below which toner plate-out occurs on the shell


18


adjacent the electrostatic imaging member


12


.




This aspect of the invention is explained more fully with reference to

FIGS. 2 and 3

, wherein the apparatus


10


is presented in a configuration for Discharged Area Development (DAD). Cross-hatching and arrows indicating movement are removed for the sake of clarity.

FIG. 2

represents development of a background area (no toner deposited), and

FIG. 3

represents development of a toned area (toner deposited). Referring specifically to

FIG. 2

, the surface of the electrostatic imaging member


12


is charged using methods known in the electrostatic imaging arts to a negative static voltage, −750 VDC, for example, relative to ground. The shell is biased with a lesser negative voltage, −600 VDC, for example, relative to ground. The difference in electrical potential generates an electric field E that is maximum where the imaging member


12


is adjacent the shell


18


. The electric field E is presented at numerous locations proximate the surface of the shell


18


with relative strength indicated by the size of the arrows. The toner particles are negatively charged in a DAD system, and are not drawn to the surface of the imaging member


12


. However, the toner particles are drawn to the surface of the shell


18


where the electric field E is maximum (adjacent the electrostatic imaging member


12


). Plate-out is avoided by moving the surface of the shell


18


through the contact length L faster than plate-out is able to occur (the minimum shell surface velocity below which toner plate-out occurs on the shell


18


adjacent the electrostatic imaging member


12


). Plate-out on the remainder of the shell


18


is prevented by the agitated motion of the mixture


16


induced by the rotating magnet poles


20


, and by avoiding placement of any biased structure adjacent the shell


18


, other than the electrostatic imaging member


20


, that would generate a plate-out causing electric field.




The existence of plate out may be determined experimentally in at least two ways. One, for example, is the appearance of image artifacts as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,029. Alternatively, the magnetic brush


14


may be operated for an extended period of time and subsequently removed. The surface of the shell


18


may then be inspected for plate-out.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, the apparatus


10


of

FIGS. 1 and 2

is shown with a discharged area of the electrostatic imaging member


12


passing over the magnetic brush


14


. The static voltage of −750 VDC on electrostatic imaging member


12


has been discharged to a lesser static voltage, −150 VDC, for example, by methods known in the art such as a laser or LED printing head, without limitation. Note that the sense of the electric field E is now reversed, and negative toner particles


46


are attracted to and adhere to the surface of the electrostatic imaging member. A residual positive charge is developed in the mixture


16


, which is carried away by the flow of the mixture


16


. Although described in relation to a DAD system, the principles described herein are equally applicable to a charged area development (CAD) system with positive toner particles.




Referring now to

FIGS. 4-6

, a DAD development process is presented wherein the shell surface velocity


26


(

FIG. 1

) is too slow. The member velocity


24


is presented in

FIGS. 4 and 5

for reference purposes. Referring specifically to

FIG. 4

, the electrostatic imaging member


12


has an electrostatic image comprising a charged area


28


and a discharged area


30


. Referring specifically to

FIG. 5

, the electrostatic imaging member


12


is presented after passing through the development zone L (FIG.


1


). The discharged area


30


of

FIG. 4

is now toned. Still referring to

FIG. 5

, there is a zone


32


of greater toner density on the leading edge of the electrostatic image than on the balance


34


of the electrostatic image. A plot of toner density versus position is presented in FIG.


6


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 7-9

, a DAD development process is presented wherein the shell surface velocity


26


(

FIG. 1

) is too fast. The member velocity


24


is presented in

FIGS. 7 and 8

for reference purposes. Referring specifically to

FIG. 7

, the electrostatic imaging member


12


has the same electrostatic image as

FIG. 4

comprising the charged area


28


and the discharged area


30


. Referring specifically to

FIG. 8

, the electrostatic imaging member


12


is presented after passing through the development zone L (FIG.


1


). The discharged area


30


of

FIG. 7

is now toned. Still referring to

FIG. 7

, there is a zone


36


of greater toner density on the trailing edge of the electrostatic image than on the balance


34


of the electrostatic image. A plot of toner density versus position is presented in FIG.


9


.




Therefore, according to a further aspect of the invention, the shell surface velocity


26


is greater than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density


32


on leading edges of the electrostatic image than on the balance


34


of the electrostatic image (FIGS.


4


-


6


), and less than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density


36


on trailing edges of the electrostatic image than on the balance


34


of the electrostatic image (FIGS.


7


-


9


). Stated differently, there is a maximum shell surface velocity above (greater than) which toner density


36


on the trailing edges is noticeably greater than on the balance


34


of the electrostatic image, and there is a minimum shell surface velocity below (less than) which toner density


36


on the leading edges is noticeably greater than on the balance


34


of the electrostatic image, the shell surface velocity being greater than or equal to the minimum shell surface velocity and less than or equal to the maximum shell surface velocity. In practice, the toned image is transferred to a print media, such a sheet of paper or overhead transparency, without limitation, and the term “noticeably greater” means that the difference in toning density is discernable by the unaided human eye.




According to a further aspect of the invention, the minimum shell velocity is 40% of the member velocity and the maximum shell velocity is 105% of the member velocity. According to a preferred embodiment, the minimum shell velocity is 50% of the member velocity


24


and the maximum shell velocity is 105% of the member velocity


24


. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the minimum shell velocity is 50% of the member velocity


24


and the maximum shell velocity is 100% of the member velocity


24


. According to a preferred embodiment, the magnitude of the member velocity


24


is at least 11.4 inches per second and, more preferably, is at least than 15 inches per second. The development zone length L is preferably greater than 0.25 inches.




According to a further aspect of the invention, certain further setpoints are optimized to improve image uniformity. Referring now to

FIG. 10

, a plot of core speed versus toning density is presented, showing a core speed setpoint


34


, and an actual maximum


36


. Here, toning density refers to the transmission density of the toned image on the photoconductor or on the receiver. The core speed is preferably set at the speed where the slope is approximately zero and also a maximum. Gearing limitations may prevent the core speed setpoint


34


from corresponding to the actual maximum


36


. According to a preferred embodiment, the setpoint


34


is close enough to the actual maximum such that gear chatter does not appear in the developed image.




Referring now to

FIG. 11

, a plot of skive spacing versus toning density is presented, showing a skive space setpoint


38


, and an actual maximum


40


. Skive spacing S is presented in FIG.


1


. Skive spacing is preferably set at the spacing S where the slope is approximately zero and also a maximum. Referring now to

FIG. 12

, a plot of film spacing relative to the shell


18


is presented, showing a film spacing setpoint


42


and an actual minimum


44


. Film spacing M is presented in FIG.


1


. Film spacing is preferably set at the spacing M where the slope is approximately zero and also a minimum. In

FIGS. 11 and 12

, the setpoints


38


and


42


are not set at the actual maximum


40


and minimum


44


, respectively, in order to illustrate application of the invention in realistic situations wherein mechanical tolerances, for example, +/−0.003 inches, are taken into account. The invention is useful if the optimum operating point falls within the tolerance range. The curves presented in

FIGS. 10-12

are determined experimentally, and can vary depending upon the particular application.




Referring now to

FIG. 13

, a development station is presented of the type that implements the development apparatus


10


according to the present invention. The toning station has a nominally 2″ diameter stainless steel toning shell containing a 14 pole magnetic core. Each alternating north and south pole has a field strength of approximately 1000 gauss. The toner has diameter 11.5 microns. The hard magnetic carrier has diameter of approximately 30 microns and resistivity of 10


11


ohm-cm. The starting point for tests at process speeds greater than 110 PPM was to increase toning station speeds proportionally to photoconductor speed, as shown below.




Image artifacts can be produced during toning at high process speeds by the countercharge in the developer, for example the positive charges noted in FIG.


3


. The countercharge can cause solid areas to have dark leading edges and light trail edges. For solid areas embedded in halftone fields, a halo artifact can occur at the trail edge of the solid area, as presented in FIG.


14


. Referring to

FIG. 14

, the photoconductor


12


comprises a developed image


48


having an elongate solid area


50


followed by a half-tone area


52


. Note that an undeveloped halo area


54


immediately follows the solid area


50


. The halo area


54


is generated due to build up of positive charge in the developer


16


while toning the solid area


50


.




For a given shell speed and photoconductor speed, the extent of the halo can be used to estimate the value of shell speed needed to prevent this problem. Referring now to

FIG. 15

, development of image


48


of

FIG. 14

is presented. The trailing edge of the solid area


50


is at the center of the toning zone of width L. The toning shell adjacent the trail edge has been exposed to the solid area for time








t=


(


L/


2)/


V




s


,  (1)






where V


s


is toning shell velocity. The time t in seconds also represents a number of toning time constants and countercharge removal time constants. Until this location on the toning shell leaves the toning zone, it will be adjacent the photoconductor for a distance x on the photoconductor, with x given by








x=t


(


V




m




−V




s


),  (2)






where V


m


is the photoconductor velocity. From (1) and (2),








x=


(


L/


2)(


V




m




−V




s


)/


V




s


.  (3)






Where x={fraction (5/16)}″ for the extent of the halo at 110 PPM, with the halo measured from the trail edge of the solid to the point in the subsequent gray area where image density has recovered to half its normal density. The toning nip has effective width L of approximately 0.352″. According to this example, V


s


greater than 75% of V


m


reduces the halo to less than {fraction (1/16)}″ in length. According to an aspect of the invention, the halo is minimized, but not entirely eliminated, since the countercharge is removed by flow of the developer


16


. Increasing shell speed Vs increases the flow rate of developer, increases the rate of removal of countercharge from the development zone L, and minimizes halo.




Although the invention has been described and illustrated with reference to specific illustrative embodiments thereof, it is not intended that the invention be limited to those illustrative embodiments. Those skilled in the art will recognize that variations and modifications can be made without departing from the true scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the claims that follow. For example, the invention can be used with electrophotographic or electrographic images. The invention can be used with imaging elements or photoconductors in either web or drum formats. Optimized setpoints for some embodiments may be attained using reflection density instead of transmission density, and the exact values of optimum setpoints may depend on the geometry of particular embodiments or particular characteristics of development in those embodiments. It is therefore intended to include within the invention all such variations and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.



Claims
  • 1. A process for developing electrostatic images, comprising:moving an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image at a member velocity; rotating a shell with a shell surface velocity adjacent said electrostatic imaging member and co-directional with said member velocity; and rotating a plurality of magnetic poles inside said shell, said shell and said magnetic poles bringing a mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers into contact with said electrostatic imaging member thereby depositing toner on said electrostatic image; said shell surface velocity being greater than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image, and less than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image.
  • 2. The process of claim 1, wherein said member velocity is at least 11.4 inches per second.
  • 3. The process of claim 1, wherein said member velocity is greater than 15 inches per second.
  • 4. The process of claim 1, further comprising a development zone length where said mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers contact said electrostatic imaging member that is greater than 0.25 inches.
  • 5. The process of claim 1, wherein said shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is less than 40% of said member velocity, and shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is greater than 105% of said member velocity.
  • 6. The process of claim 1, wherein said shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is less than 50% of said member velocity, and shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is greater than 105% of said member velocity.
  • 7. The process of claim 1, wherein said shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is less than 50% of said member velocity, and shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is greater than 100% of said member velocity.
  • 8. A process for developing electrostatic images, comprising:moving an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image at a member velocity, said electrostatic image having leading edges and trailing edges; rotating a shell with a shell surface velocity adjacent said electrostatic imaging member and co-directional with said member velocity; and rotating a plurality of magnetic poles inside a shell and rotating said shell with a shell surface velocity co-directional with said member velocity, said shell and said magnetic poles bringing a mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers into contact with said electrostatic imaging member thereby depositing toner on said electrostatic image with a toner density wherein (a) there is a minimum shell surface velocity below which toner density on said leading edges is noticeably greater than on the balance of said electrostatic image, and (b) there is a maximum shell surface velocity above which toner density on said trailing edges is noticeably greater than on the balance of said electrostatic image, said shell surface velocity being greater than or equal to said minimum shell surface velocity and less than or equal to said maximum shell surface velocity.
  • 9. The process of claim 8, wherein said member velocity is at least 11.4 inches per second.
  • 10. The process of claim 8, wherein said member velocity is greater than 15 inches per second.
  • 11. The process of claim 8, further comprising a development zone length where said mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers contact said electrostatic imaging member that is greater than 0.25 inches.
  • 12. The process of claim 8, wherein said minimum shell velocity is 40% of said member velocity and said maximum shell velocity is 105% of said member velocity.
  • 13. The process of claim 8, wherein said minimum shell velocity is 50% of said member velocity and said maximum shell velocity is 105% of said member velocity.
  • 14. The process of claim 8, wherein said minimum shell velocity is 50% of said member velocity and said maximum shell velocity is 100% of said member velocity.
US Referenced Citations (86)
Number Name Date Kind
4473029 Fritz et al. Sep 1984 A
4496643 Wilson et al. Jan 1985 A
4531832 Kroll et al. Jul 1985 A
4546060 Miskinis et al. Oct 1985 A
4602863 Fritz et al. Jul 1986 A
4634286 Pike Jan 1987 A
4637973 Shigeta et al. Jan 1987 A
4671207 Hilbert Jun 1987 A
4714046 Steele et al. Dec 1987 A
4764445 Miskinis et al. Aug 1988 A
4825244 Hediger Apr 1989 A
4887132 Joseph et al. Dec 1989 A
4922302 Hill et al. May 1990 A
4949127 Matsuda et al. Aug 1990 A
4967236 Rodenberg et al. Oct 1990 A
5001028 Mosehauer et al. Mar 1991 A
5019796 Lee et al. May 1991 A
5040003 Willis Aug 1991 A
5043760 MacLellan et al. Aug 1991 A
5047807 Kalyandurg Sep 1991 A
5049471 Higashiguchi et al. Sep 1991 A
5061586 Saha et al. Oct 1991 A
5063399 Zeman et al. Nov 1991 A
5066981 Kalyandurg Nov 1991 A
5084739 Kalyandurg et al. Jan 1992 A
5095340 Mahoney Mar 1992 A
5104761 Saha et al. Apr 1992 A
5106714 Saha et al. Apr 1992 A
5111245 DeCecca et al. May 1992 A
5132732 Kalyandurg et al. Jul 1992 A
5138388 Kamp et al. Aug 1992 A
5146278 Kroll et al. Sep 1992 A
5148220 Hilbert et al. Sep 1992 A
5162854 Hilbert et al. Nov 1992 A
5182608 Kroll et al. Jan 1993 A
5184194 Mosehauer et al. Feb 1993 A
5190841 Saha et al. Mar 1993 A
5190842 Saha et al. Mar 1993 A
5196887 Hilbert et al. Mar 1993 A
5227265 DeBoer et al. Jul 1993 A
5237127 DeCecca et al. Aug 1993 A
5239342 Kubo et al. Aug 1993 A
5241327 Rubin et al. Aug 1993 A
5245388 Rydelek et al. Sep 1993 A
5247331 Rydelek Sep 1993 A
5255053 Green et al. Oct 1993 A
5268249 Saha et al. Dec 1993 A
5268719 Rydelek et al. Dec 1993 A
5280302 Rubin et al. Jan 1994 A
5282002 Jacobs et al. Jan 1994 A
5291259 Weitzel et al. Mar 1994 A
5293201 Kamp et al. Mar 1994 A
5296894 Green et al. Mar 1994 A
5296898 Rubin et al. Mar 1994 A
5296905 Yousey et al. Mar 1994 A
5298358 Rubin et al. Mar 1994 A
5300988 Westbrook et al. Apr 1994 A
5306592 Saha Apr 1994 A
5313993 Corby et al. May 1994 A
5325161 Saha et al. Jun 1994 A
5332645 Saha et al. Jul 1994 A
5339140 Zeman et al. Aug 1994 A
5344731 Deboer et al. Sep 1994 A
5347345 Osterhoudt Sep 1994 A
5347347 Hilbert et al. Sep 1994 A
5376492 Stelter et al. Dec 1994 A
5400124 Kass et al. Mar 1995 A
5409791 Kaukeinen et al. Apr 1995 A
5484680 Goto et al. Jan 1996 A
5489975 Kaukeinen et al. Feb 1996 A
5500320 Saha Mar 1996 A
5512404 Saha Apr 1996 A
5592268 Uehara et al. Jan 1997 A
5640656 Hilbert et al. Jun 1997 A
5701550 Lofftus et al. Dec 1997 A
5705307 Tyagi et al. Jan 1998 A
5713064 Kasiske et al. Jan 1998 A
5732311 May et al. Mar 1998 A
5748218 Stelter et al. May 1998 A
5835832 Rimai et al. Nov 1998 A
5853941 Rimai et al. Dec 1998 A
5923933 Anzai et al. Jul 1999 A
5923937 Thompson et al. Jul 1999 A
5926679 May et al. Jul 1999 A
5998076 Mahabadi et al. Dec 1999 A
6125257 Sekine et al. Sep 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
03-170978 Jul 1991 JP
04-097268 Mar 1992 JP
10-161423 Jun 1998 JP
WO 8500438 Jan 1985 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/204882 May 2000 US