Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6526247
-
Patent Number
6,526,247
-
Date Filed
Tuesday, May 15, 200123 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, February 25, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 399 265
- 399 266
- 399 267
- 399 270
- 399 275
- 399 276
- 399 277
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
The invention relates generally to processes for electrostatic image development, and setpoints that provide uniform image development. In particular, an apparatus and process having a magnetic brush that implements hard carriers and a rotating magnetic core within a shell is disclosed. The process implements one or more of the following optimum setpoints: a range of shell surface speeds that provide uniform toning density, a range of shell surface speeds that prevent toner plate-out, a skive spacing that minimizes sensitivity to variation, a magnetic core speed that minimizes sensitivity to variation, and an imaging member spacing that minimizes sensitivity to variation.
Description
BACKGROUND
The invention relates generally to processes for electrostatic image development, and setpoints that provide uniform image development.
Processes for developing electrostatic images using dry toner are well known in the art. A process that implements hard magnetic carriers and a rotating magnetic core is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,546,060 and 4,473,029. The rotating magnetic core promotes agitated flow of the toner/carrier mixture, which improves development relative to certain other development processes. In spite of such improvements, certain image artifacts still occur, some of which are the result of process setpoints. Therefore, a more robust process without image artifacts is generally desired.
SUMMARY
A process for developing electrostatic images comprising depositing a uniform toner density on an electrostatic image using a magnetic brush comprising hard magnetic carriers, a rotating shell, and a rotating plurality of magnets inside the rotating shell, without plating-out the rotating shell with toner.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
presents a side cross-sectional view of an apparatus for developing electrostatic images, according to an aspect of the present invention.
FIG. 2
presents a side schematic view of a discharged area development configuration of the
FIG. 1
apparatus with a background area passing over a magnetic brush.
FIG. 3
presents a side schematic view of a discharged area development configuration of the
FIG. 1
apparatus with an area that is being toned passing over a magnetic brush.
FIG. 4
presents a plan view of an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image.
FIG. 5
presents a plan view of
FIG. 4
electrostatic imaging member after development.
FIG. 6
presents a plot of toning density versus position for the developed image of FIG.
5
.
FIG. 7
presents a plan view of an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image.
FIG. 8
presents a plan view of
FIG. 7
electrostatic imaging member after development.
FIG. 9
presents a plot of toning density versus position for the developed image of FIG.
8
.
FIG. 10
presents a plot of core speed versus toning density.
FIG. 11
presents a plot of skive spacing versus toning density.
FIG. 12
presents a plot of electrostatic imaging member spacing relative to the magnetic brush shell versus toning density.
FIG. 13
presents a cross-sectional view of a toning station that implements the development apparatus of FIG.
1
.
FIG. 14
presents a toned image comprising a solid area followed by a half-tone or grey area.
FIG. 15
presents development process of the
FIG. 14
image, according to an aspect of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Various aspects of the invention are presented in
FIGS. 1-15
, which are not drawn to scale, and wherein like components in the numerous views are numbered alike. Referring now specifically to
FIG. 1
, an apparatus and process are presented, according to an aspect of the invention. An apparatus
10
for developing electrostatic images is presented comprising an electrostatic imaging member
12
having an electrostatic image and a magnetic brush
14
comprising a rotating shell
18
, a mixture
16
of hard magnetic carriers and toner (also referred to herein as “developer”), and a rotating plurality of magnets
20
inside the rotating shell
18
. A process for developing electrostatic images, according to an aspect of the invention, comprises depositing a uniform toner density on the electrostatic image using the magnetic brush
14
comprising hard magnetic carriers, a rotating shell
18
, and a rotating plurality of magnets
20
inside the rotating shell
18
, without plating-out the rotating shell
18
with toner. As used herein, “plate-out” refers to a condition wherein the external surface of the rotating shell
18
is coated with toner particles to the extent that the image is affected.
The magnetic brush
14
operates according to the principles described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,473,029 and 4,546,060, the contents of which are fully incorporated by reference as if set forth herein. The two-component dry developer composition of U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,060 comprises charged toner particles and oppositely charged, magnetic carrier particles, which (a) comprise a magnetic material exhibiting “hard” magnetic properties, as characterized by a coercivity of at least 300 gauss and (b) exhibit an induced magnetic moment of at least 20 EMU/gm when in an applied field of 1000 gauss, is disclosed. As described in the '060 patent, the developer is employed in combination with a magnetic applicator comprising a rotatable magnetic core and an outer, nonmagnetizable shell to develop electrostatic images. When hard magnetic carrier particles are employed, exposure to a succession of magnetic fields emanating from the rotating core applicator causes the particles to flip or turn to move into magnetic alignment in each new field. Each flip, moreover, as a consequence of both the magnetic moment of the particles and the coercivity of the magnetic material, is accompanied by a rapid circumferential step by each particle in a direction opposite the movement of the rotating core. The observed result is that the developers of the '060 flow smoothly and at a rapid rate around the shell while the core rotates in the opposite direction, thus rapidly delivering fresh toner to the photoconductor and facilitating high-volume copy and printer applications.
The electrostatic imaging member
12
of
FIGS. 1-3
is configured as a sheet-like film. However, it may be configured in other ways, such as a drum, depending upon the particular application. A film electrostatic imaging member
12
is relatively resilient, typically under tension, and a pair of backer bars
32
may be provided that hold the imaging member in a desired position relative to the shell
18
, as shown in FIG.
1
.
According to a further aspect of the invention, the process comprises moving electrostatic imaging member
12
at a member velocity
24
, and rotating the shell
18
with a shell surface velocity
26
adjacent the electrostatic imaging member
12
and co-directional with the member velocity
24
. The shell
18
and magnetic poles
20
bring the mixture
16
of hard magnetic carriers and toner into contact with the electrostatic imaging member
12
. The mixture
16
contacts that electrostatic imaging member
12
over a length indicated as L. The electrostatic imaging member is electrically grounded
22
and defines a ground plane. The surface of the electrostatic imaging member facing the shell
18
is a photoconductor that can be treated at this point in the process as an electrical insulator, the shell opposite that is grounded is an electrical conductor. Biasing the shell relative to the ground
22
with a voltage V creates an electric field that attracts toner particles to the electrostatic image with a uniform toner density, the electric field being a maximum where the shell
18
is adjacent to the electrostatic imaging member
12
. According to an aspect of the invention, toner plate-out is avoided by the electric field being a maximum where the shell
18
is adjacent to the electrostatic imaging member
12
, and by the shell surface velocity
26
being greater than or equal to a minimum shell surface velocity below which toner plate-out occurs on the shell
18
adjacent the electrostatic imaging member
12
.
This aspect of the invention is explained more fully with reference to
FIGS. 2 and 3
, wherein the apparatus
10
is presented in a configuration for Discharged Area Development (DAD). Cross-hatching and arrows indicating movement are removed for the sake of clarity.
FIG. 2
represents development of a background area (no toner deposited), and
FIG. 3
represents development of a toned area (toner deposited). Referring specifically to
FIG. 2
, the surface of the electrostatic imaging member
12
is charged using methods known in the electrostatic imaging arts to a negative static voltage, −750 VDC, for example, relative to ground. The shell is biased with a lesser negative voltage, −600 VDC, for example, relative to ground. The difference in electrical potential generates an electric field E that is maximum where the imaging member
12
is adjacent the shell
18
. The electric field E is presented at numerous locations proximate the surface of the shell
18
with relative strength indicated by the size of the arrows. The toner particles are negatively charged in a DAD system, and are not drawn to the surface of the imaging member
12
. However, the toner particles are drawn to the surface of the shell
18
where the electric field E is maximum (adjacent the electrostatic imaging member
12
). Plate-out is avoided by moving the surface of the shell
18
through the contact length L faster than plate-out is able to occur (the minimum shell surface velocity below which toner plate-out occurs on the shell
18
adjacent the electrostatic imaging member
12
). Plate-out on the remainder of the shell
18
is prevented by the agitated motion of the mixture
16
induced by the rotating magnet poles
20
, and by avoiding placement of any biased structure adjacent the shell
18
, other than the electrostatic imaging member
20
, that would generate a plate-out causing electric field.
The existence of plate out may be determined experimentally in at least two ways. One, for example, is the appearance of image artifacts as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,029. Alternatively, the magnetic brush
14
may be operated for an extended period of time and subsequently removed. The surface of the shell
18
may then be inspected for plate-out.
Referring now to
FIG. 3
, the apparatus
10
of
FIGS. 1 and 2
is shown with a discharged area of the electrostatic imaging member
12
passing over the magnetic brush
14
. The static voltage of −750 VDC on electrostatic imaging member
12
has been discharged to a lesser static voltage, −150 VDC, for example, by methods known in the art such as a laser or LED printing head, without limitation. Note that the sense of the electric field E is now reversed, and negative toner particles
46
are attracted to and adhere to the surface of the electrostatic imaging member. A residual positive charge is developed in the mixture
16
, which is carried away by the flow of the mixture
16
. Although described in relation to a DAD system, the principles described herein are equally applicable to a charged area development (CAD) system with positive toner particles.
Referring now to
FIGS. 4-6
, a DAD development process is presented wherein the shell surface velocity
26
(
FIG. 1
) is too slow. The member velocity
24
is presented in
FIGS. 4 and 5
for reference purposes. Referring specifically to
FIG. 4
, the electrostatic imaging member
12
has an electrostatic image comprising a charged area
28
and a discharged area
30
. Referring specifically to
FIG. 5
, the electrostatic imaging member
12
is presented after passing through the development zone L (FIG.
1
). The discharged area
30
of
FIG. 4
is now toned. Still referring to
FIG. 5
, there is a zone
32
of greater toner density on the leading edge of the electrostatic image than on the balance
34
of the electrostatic image. A plot of toner density versus position is presented in FIG.
6
.
Referring now to
FIGS. 7-9
, a DAD development process is presented wherein the shell surface velocity
26
(
FIG. 1
) is too fast. The member velocity
24
is presented in
FIGS. 7 and 8
for reference purposes. Referring specifically to
FIG. 7
, the electrostatic imaging member
12
has the same electrostatic image as
FIG. 4
comprising the charged area
28
and the discharged area
30
. Referring specifically to
FIG. 8
, the electrostatic imaging member
12
is presented after passing through the development zone L (FIG.
1
). The discharged area
30
of
FIG. 7
is now toned. Still referring to
FIG. 7
, there is a zone
36
of greater toner density on the trailing edge of the electrostatic image than on the balance
34
of the electrostatic image. A plot of toner density versus position is presented in FIG.
9
.
Therefore, according to a further aspect of the invention, the shell surface velocity
26
is greater than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density
32
on leading edges of the electrostatic image than on the balance
34
of the electrostatic image (FIGS.
4
-
6
), and less than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density
36
on trailing edges of the electrostatic image than on the balance
34
of the electrostatic image (FIGS.
7
-
9
). Stated differently, there is a maximum shell surface velocity above (greater than) which toner density
36
on the trailing edges is noticeably greater than on the balance
34
of the electrostatic image, and there is a minimum shell surface velocity below (less than) which toner density
36
on the leading edges is noticeably greater than on the balance
34
of the electrostatic image, the shell surface velocity being greater than or equal to the minimum shell surface velocity and less than or equal to the maximum shell surface velocity. In practice, the toned image is transferred to a print media, such a sheet of paper or overhead transparency, without limitation, and the term “noticeably greater” means that the difference in toning density is discernable by the unaided human eye.
According to a further aspect of the invention, the minimum shell velocity is 40% of the member velocity and the maximum shell velocity is 105% of the member velocity. According to a preferred embodiment, the minimum shell velocity is 50% of the member velocity
24
and the maximum shell velocity is 105% of the member velocity
24
. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the minimum shell velocity is 50% of the member velocity
24
and the maximum shell velocity is 100% of the member velocity
24
. According to a preferred embodiment, the magnitude of the member velocity
24
is at least 11.4 inches per second and, more preferably, is at least than 15 inches per second. The development zone length L is preferably greater than 0.25 inches.
According to a further aspect of the invention, certain further setpoints are optimized to improve image uniformity. Referring now to
FIG. 10
, a plot of core speed versus toning density is presented, showing a core speed setpoint
34
, and an actual maximum
36
. Here, toning density refers to the transmission density of the toned image on the photoconductor or on the receiver. The core speed is preferably set at the speed where the slope is approximately zero and also a maximum. Gearing limitations may prevent the core speed setpoint
34
from corresponding to the actual maximum
36
. According to a preferred embodiment, the setpoint
34
is close enough to the actual maximum such that gear chatter does not appear in the developed image.
Referring now to
FIG. 11
, a plot of skive spacing versus toning density is presented, showing a skive space setpoint
38
, and an actual maximum
40
. Skive spacing S is presented in FIG.
1
. Skive spacing is preferably set at the spacing S where the slope is approximately zero and also a maximum. Referring now to
FIG. 12
, a plot of film spacing relative to the shell
18
is presented, showing a film spacing setpoint
42
and an actual minimum
44
. Film spacing M is presented in FIG.
1
. Film spacing is preferably set at the spacing M where the slope is approximately zero and also a minimum. In
FIGS. 11 and 12
, the setpoints
38
and
42
are not set at the actual maximum
40
and minimum
44
, respectively, in order to illustrate application of the invention in realistic situations wherein mechanical tolerances, for example, +/−0.003 inches, are taken into account. The invention is useful if the optimum operating point falls within the tolerance range. The curves presented in
FIGS. 10-12
are determined experimentally, and can vary depending upon the particular application.
Referring now to
FIG. 13
, a development station is presented of the type that implements the development apparatus
10
according to the present invention. The toning station has a nominally 2″ diameter stainless steel toning shell containing a 14 pole magnetic core. Each alternating north and south pole has a field strength of approximately 1000 gauss. The toner has diameter 11.5 microns. The hard magnetic carrier has diameter of approximately 30 microns and resistivity of 10
11
ohm-cm. The starting point for tests at process speeds greater than 110 PPM was to increase toning station speeds proportionally to photoconductor speed, as shown below.
Image artifacts can be produced during toning at high process speeds by the countercharge in the developer, for example the positive charges noted in FIG.
3
. The countercharge can cause solid areas to have dark leading edges and light trail edges. For solid areas embedded in halftone fields, a halo artifact can occur at the trail edge of the solid area, as presented in FIG.
14
. Referring to
FIG. 14
, the photoconductor
12
comprises a developed image
48
having an elongate solid area
50
followed by a half-tone area
52
. Note that an undeveloped halo area
54
immediately follows the solid area
50
. The halo area
54
is generated due to build up of positive charge in the developer
16
while toning the solid area
50
.
For a given shell speed and photoconductor speed, the extent of the halo can be used to estimate the value of shell speed needed to prevent this problem. Referring now to
FIG. 15
, development of image
48
of
FIG. 14
is presented. The trailing edge of the solid area
50
is at the center of the toning zone of width L. The toning shell adjacent the trail edge has been exposed to the solid area for time
t=
(
L/
2)/
V
s
, (1)
where V
s
is toning shell velocity. The time t in seconds also represents a number of toning time constants and countercharge removal time constants. Until this location on the toning shell leaves the toning zone, it will be adjacent the photoconductor for a distance x on the photoconductor, with x given by
x=t
(
V
m
−V
s
), (2)
where V
m
is the photoconductor velocity. From (1) and (2),
x=
(
L/
2)(
V
m
−V
s
)/
V
s
. (3)
Where x={fraction (5/16)}″ for the extent of the halo at 110 PPM, with the halo measured from the trail edge of the solid to the point in the subsequent gray area where image density has recovered to half its normal density. The toning nip has effective width L of approximately 0.352″. According to this example, V
s
greater than 75% of V
m
reduces the halo to less than {fraction (1/16)}″ in length. According to an aspect of the invention, the halo is minimized, but not entirely eliminated, since the countercharge is removed by flow of the developer
16
. Increasing shell speed Vs increases the flow rate of developer, increases the rate of removal of countercharge from the development zone L, and minimizes halo.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with reference to specific illustrative embodiments thereof, it is not intended that the invention be limited to those illustrative embodiments. Those skilled in the art will recognize that variations and modifications can be made without departing from the true scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the claims that follow. For example, the invention can be used with electrophotographic or electrographic images. The invention can be used with imaging elements or photoconductors in either web or drum formats. Optimized setpoints for some embodiments may be attained using reflection density instead of transmission density, and the exact values of optimum setpoints may depend on the geometry of particular embodiments or particular characteristics of development in those embodiments. It is therefore intended to include within the invention all such variations and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Claims
- 1. A process for developing electrostatic images, comprising:moving an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image at a member velocity; rotating a shell with a shell surface velocity adjacent said electrostatic imaging member and co-directional with said member velocity; and rotating a plurality of magnetic poles inside said shell, said shell and said magnetic poles bringing a mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers into contact with said electrostatic imaging member thereby depositing toner on said electrostatic image; said shell surface velocity being greater than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image, and less than a shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image.
- 2. The process of claim 1, wherein said member velocity is at least 11.4 inches per second.
- 3. The process of claim 1, wherein said member velocity is greater than 15 inches per second.
- 4. The process of claim 1, further comprising a development zone length where said mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers contact said electrostatic imaging member that is greater than 0.25 inches.
- 5. The process of claim 1, wherein said shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is less than 40% of said member velocity, and shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is greater than 105% of said member velocity.
- 6. The process of claim 1, wherein said shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is less than 50% of said member velocity, and shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is greater than 105% of said member velocity.
- 7. The process of claim 1, wherein said shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on leading edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is less than 50% of said member velocity, and shell surface velocity that creates noticeably greater toner density on trailing edges of said electrostatic image than on the balance of said electrostatic image is greater than 100% of said member velocity.
- 8. A process for developing electrostatic images, comprising:moving an electrostatic imaging member having an electrostatic image at a member velocity, said electrostatic image having leading edges and trailing edges; rotating a shell with a shell surface velocity adjacent said electrostatic imaging member and co-directional with said member velocity; and rotating a plurality of magnetic poles inside a shell and rotating said shell with a shell surface velocity co-directional with said member velocity, said shell and said magnetic poles bringing a mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers into contact with said electrostatic imaging member thereby depositing toner on said electrostatic image with a toner density wherein (a) there is a minimum shell surface velocity below which toner density on said leading edges is noticeably greater than on the balance of said electrostatic image, and (b) there is a maximum shell surface velocity above which toner density on said trailing edges is noticeably greater than on the balance of said electrostatic image, said shell surface velocity being greater than or equal to said minimum shell surface velocity and less than or equal to said maximum shell surface velocity.
- 9. The process of claim 8, wherein said member velocity is at least 11.4 inches per second.
- 10. The process of claim 8, wherein said member velocity is greater than 15 inches per second.
- 11. The process of claim 8, further comprising a development zone length where said mixture of toner and hard magnetic carriers contact said electrostatic imaging member that is greater than 0.25 inches.
- 12. The process of claim 8, wherein said minimum shell velocity is 40% of said member velocity and said maximum shell velocity is 105% of said member velocity.
- 13. The process of claim 8, wherein said minimum shell velocity is 50% of said member velocity and said maximum shell velocity is 105% of said member velocity.
- 14. The process of claim 8, wherein said minimum shell velocity is 50% of said member velocity and said maximum shell velocity is 100% of said member velocity.
US Referenced Citations (86)
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number |
Date |
Country |
03-170978 |
Jul 1991 |
JP |
04-097268 |
Mar 1992 |
JP |
10-161423 |
Jun 1998 |
JP |
WO 8500438 |
Jan 1985 |
WO |
Provisional Applications (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
|
60/204882 |
May 2000 |
US |