Electrostatic polymer aerosol deposition and fusing of solid particles for three-dimensional printing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10919215
  • Patent Number
    10,919,215
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 22, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 16, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
An additive manufacturing system has an aerosol generator to aerosolize a powder, a deposition surface, a surface charging element to apply a blanket charge to the deposition surface, a charging print head to selectively remove portions of the blanket charge from the deposition surface, and a transport system to transport the aerosol powder from the aerosol generator to the deposition surface, the transport system having an aerosol charging element to apply charge opposite of the blanket charge to the aerosol powder. An additive manufacturing process includes creating an aerosol from a powder at a spray generator, charging the aerosol to produce a charged aerosol having a first charge, forming a blanket charge on a deposition surface having a second charge of an opposite polarity from the first charge, selectively removing regions of the blanket charge, and transporting the charged aerosol to the charged regions to form structures on the charged regions from the charged aerosol.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to polymer spray deposition, more particularly to polymer spray deposition using powders.


BACKGROUND

Custom manufacturing of parts is a growing industry and has wide ranging applications. Traditionally, injection molding machines and other machining techniques were used to create models of objects or to create the objects themselves. More specifically, heated materials like glass, metals, thermoplastics, and other polymers are injected into an injection mold specifically formed in the shape of the desired object. The material can cool in the mold and take on the shape of the mold to form the object. Injection molds are expensive and time-consuming to create and changes to the shape of the object are difficult to accommodate without further increasing the time and expense of creating the object.


The additive manufacturing industry arose in response to the expense, time, and difficulty in changing injection molds to create models or objects themselves. Known additive manufacturing techniques include fused deposition modeling (FDM), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), and jetting systems among others. Each known additive manufacturing technique has limitations in materials, expense, and/or volume capabilities that prevent the production of small run, customized manufacturing and prototyping using a complete set of thermoplastic materials. Further, known additive manufacturing techniques are unable to accurately create a part with mechanical properties, surface finish, and feature replication of the quality object produced by traditional techniques like injection molding.


In situations in which additive manufacturing does not produce parts of sufficient performance for an application, an entire industry of rapid computer numerical control (CNC) machining and rapid injection molding using low cost tools has arisen. However, these techniques are significantly more expensive than additive manufacturing techniques and have their own process limitations.


The industry was forced to decide between a high quality, high volume capability object produced by the traditional, but expensive, inflexible, and time-consuming techniques like injection molding and additive manufacturing techniques that produced a lower quality object, perhaps without the desired structural integrity, and sometimes without the desired materials, but with greater speed and flexibility.


For example, FDM and SLS are limited in the type of material able to be used and create a less than 100% density object. Rapid CNC molding has better quality objects with great feature detail and finishes, but remains expensive. Prototypes created with the known additive manufacturing techniques are often refined until a final design is selected at which point an injection mold is created for large scale, high quality injection molding production. Such a multi-phase production process is also time-consuming and expensive.


One method involves polymer spray deposition (PSD). This process forms a spray or aerosol of polymer drops and charges them to cause them to selectively deposit on a charged surface. The formation of the aerosol may take many forms. Many of them typically require controlled temperature and an inert atmosphere. These typically result in higher costs and more complex manufacturing environments.


SUMMARY

An embodiment is an additive manufacturing system that has an aerosol generator to aerosolize a powder, a deposition surface, a surface charging element to apply a blanket charge to the deposition surface, a charging print head to selectively remove portions of the blanket charge from the deposition surface, and a transport system to transport the aerosol powder from the aerosol generator to the deposition surface, the transport system having an aerosol charging element to apply charge opposite of the blanket charge to the aerosol powder.


Another embodiment is an additive manufacturing process that includes creating an aerosol from a powder at a spray generator, charging the aerosol to produce a charged aerosol having a first charge, forming a blanket charge on a deposition surface having a second charge of an opposite polarity from the first charge, selectively removing regions of the blanket charge, and transporting the charged aerosol to the charged regions to form structures on the charged regions from the charged aerosol.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of a three-dimensional additive manufacturing system.



FIG. 2 shows another view of a three-dimensional additive manufacturing system.



FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of a return and recycling path.



FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of a three-dimensional additive manufacturing system with a support material.



FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a method of three-dimensional additive manufacturing.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

The embodiments here provide the benefits of three-dimensional, digital, additive manufacturing techniques with a broader range of thermoplastic materials than would otherwise be attainable. They result in feature size resolution of the produced objects similar in complexity and structural integrity to more traditional manufacturing techniques, such as injection molding processes. The systems and methods here can aerosolize and create three-dimensional objects out of high molecular weight polymers powders and other thermoplastics, such as nylon, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polypropylene, polysulfone, and acetal. The use of powders may alleviate some of the manufacturing restraints on temperature and atmospheres that affect fluids.



FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an example polymer deposition system 100 that includes an aerosol generator 102, a transport system 104, a multi-nozzle array 106, and an object production stage 108. The aerosol generator 102 receives powder from a powder source 110 and. The aerosol of the powder can be formed in many different methods well known in the art, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,862,646, or found at www.tsi.com/small-scale-powder-disperser-3443. In one embodiment, a stream of high velocity gas is blown into a container partially filled with power. The airflow entrains the particles and the chaotic nature of the flow mixes the air and powder such that it creates an aerosol. This aerosol can be removed from the container with another flow or a vacuum.


A transport system 104 then transports the aerosolized powder from the aerosol generator 102 to a multi-nozzle array 106 that dispenses the powder onto a surface in the object production stage. The transport system 104 includes a charge element 116 that charges the spray with a charge of a first polarity. As will be discussed in more detail later, the deposition surface will have regions with an opposite charge to attract the aerosolized powder particles to those regions. The charged aerosol is then applied to the surface using the multi-nozzle array to the deposition surface. Any ‘waste’ or leftover material may be recycled by the material recycler 120.



FIG. 2 shows an alternative view of an additive manufacturing system 200. The aerosol generator 206 aerosolizes a powder shown as particles 204. The transport system 208, possibly consisting of an air stream 202, transports the aerosolized powder from the aerosol generator 206 to the deposition surface 214. In one embodiment, the transport system may include tubing, with insulation as needed, a sheath flow of air, and possible filtration. In addition, the transport stream may include an inertial impactor to allow size selection, as well as filters as needed.


Charge element 210 applies a charge of a first polarity to the aerosol. This may involve a set of electrodes on either side of the transport system to generate an electric field through which the aerosol passes. The deposition surface 214 will receive the charged particles such as 216. In one embodiment, the deposition surface resides on a stage 218 that may be a three-axis (x, y, and z) stage that moves relative to the deposition nozzle array.


Prior to the charged particles reaching the deposition surface selective regions of the deposition surface received an opposite charge. In one embodiment, a first charging device such as a corotron 220 (a corona charging device) applies a blanket charge to the deposition surface, the charge being of a opposite polarity to the first polarity. While FIG. 2 shows the charging device 220, it will only be present prior to the arrival of the powder spray.


After the blanket charge formed on the deposition surface, another charging device, such as an ionographic print head, neutralizes the charge from the non-part portions of the surface. The particles will be attracted to the portions of the deposition surface that still have the opposite charge.


Once the particles from the powder spray reach the deposition surface and ‘stick’ to the oppositely charged regions, the parts or other structures will begin to form. During or after formation of the parts, the powder material may undergo heating to fuse the material into the parts. Fusing can be achieved through the application of heat and/or pressure. Heat can be applied through the use of an infrared source, a heated roller, or the use of high temperature air. Other embodiments may involve application of ultraviolet light to cure powder formations made from UV-curable powders. In addition, the powder aerosol may also be pressurized to assist with the fusing.


As the powder material collects in the selected regions of the deposition surface, portions of the powder spray will fall off the deposition surface. In some embodiments, the powder material that does not stick could be recycled back to the aerosol generator 206. The material recycling will typically occur away from the heat or other energy used to fuse the parts forming at the charged regions of the deposition surface. FIG. 3 shows an example of the recycling path 120 from FIG. 1. The powder material flows past the deposition surface 214 and some of the particles 216 are attracted to the regions of the deposition surface 214.


As shown in FIG. 4, once the powder material is fused to form the parts such as 300, an optional support material 302 may fill in the gaps such as 308 to create a smooth flat surface. The material could reach the gaps from a nozzle 304 and a doctor blade 306 or other implement would smooth it in to the gaps to provide more structurally robust parts.



FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of an overall process flow. At 400, a deposition surface receives a blanket charge at 400. Another device, such as an ionographic print head, selectively neutralizes charge from the deposition surface at 402. Meanwhile, the system generates an aerosol from a powder at 404 and transports it to the deposition surface 406. While the aerosol is in transport, it undergoes charging at 408. As the aerosol reaches the deposition surface it is fused onto the surface to form the desired structures at 410. In an optional step, a support material fills the gaps, discussed previously.


In this manner, three-dimensional additive manufacturing can create parts in a manufacturing process using powders. This may provide a less complex and less expensive manufacturing process for formation of a polymer for spray deposition.


It will be appreciated that variants of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. An additive manufacturing system, comprising; a powder source; an aerosol generator to use a flow of gas to aerosolize powder from the source to produce an aerosol powder; a deposition surface; a surface charging element to apply a blanket charge to the deposition surface; a charging print head to selectively remove portions of the blanket charge from the deposition surface; and a transport system comprising one of either a second flow of gas or a vacuum, to transport the aerosol powder from the aerosol generator to the deposition surface, the transport system having an aerosol charging element to apply charge opposite of the blanket charge to the aerosol powder within the transport system such that the aerosol forms the part being manufactured on portions of the deposition surface where charge remains; a nozzle to receive the aerosol powder from the transport system to dispense the aerosol powder onto the deposition surface; and a movable object production stage to hold the deposition surface, the movable object production stage being translatable relative to the nozzle.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising an inertial impactor in the transport system to select sizes of particles.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a filter in the transport system.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a dispenser to dispense a supporting material between the structures.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the surface charging element comprises a corotron.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the charging print head comprises a ionographic print head.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the transport system comprises tubing to contain the aerosol powder as the aerosol powder moves between the aerosol generator and the deposition surface.
US Referenced Citations (54)
Number Name Date Kind
2291046 Lange Jul 1942 A
2551582 Carlson May 1951 A
2862646 Hayford et al. Dec 1958 A
3052213 Schaffert Sep 1962 A
3068115 Gundlach Dec 1962 A
3330683 Simm Jul 1967 A
3554815 Otto Jan 1971 A
3626833 Koch Dec 1971 A
3649829 Randolph Mar 1972 A
3702258 Gibbons et al. Nov 1972 A
3717875 Arciprete et al. Feb 1973 A
3779166 Pressman Dec 1973 A
3797926 Fotland et al. Mar 1974 A
3873025 Qvarnstrom Mar 1975 A
3926114 Matuschke Dec 1975 A
3977323 Pressman et al. Aug 1976 A
4034670 Zavodny Jul 1977 A
4222059 Crean et al. Sep 1980 A
4384296 Torpey May 1983 A
5103763 Goldowsky Apr 1992 A
5204697 Schmidlin Apr 1993 A
5270086 Hamlin Dec 1993 A
5314119 Watt May 1994 A
6066285 Kumar May 2000 A
6382524 James May 2002 B1
6576861 Sampath et al. Jun 2003 B2
6622335 Anderson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6934142 Grosse et al. Aug 2005 B2
7083830 Minko Aug 2006 B2
8132744 King et al. Mar 2012 B2
8272579 King et al. Aug 2012 B2
8511251 Sato Aug 2013 B2
8552299 Rogers et al. Oct 2013 B2
8720370 Rebstock May 2014 B2
8742246 Toyoda et al. Jun 2014 B2
9021948 Pattekar May 2015 B2
10500784 Johnson Dec 2019 B2
20020053320 Duthaler et al. May 2002 A1
20050000231 Lee Jan 2005 A1
20060035033 Tanahashi et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070194157 Golden Aug 2007 A1
20090014046 Yu et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090155732 Limb et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100154856 Yuichi et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110017431 Yang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110150036 Lee et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154558 Peter et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120227778 Leonov Sep 2012 A1
20130087180 Stark et al. Apr 2013 A1
20140146116 Paschkewitz May 2014 A1
20150210009 Johnson et al. Jul 2015 A1
20160229119 Renn Aug 2016 A1
20170192382 Baecker Jul 2017 A1
20180015730 Essien Jan 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
2227834 Aug 2011 EP
2868390 May 2015 EP
3196003 Jul 2017 EP
1035235 Apr 1951 FR
9313897 Jul 1993 WO
9709125 Mar 1997 WO
2004028707 Apr 2004 WO
2006122645 Nov 2006 WO
2015183644 Dec 2015 WO
2016205743 Dec 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Bhat, Pradeep P., “Formation of beads-on-a-string structures during break-up of viscoelastic filaments,” Aug. 2010, vol. 6:625-631, Nature Physics, 7 pages.
Le, Hue P., “Progress and Trends in Ink-jet Printing Technology,” Jan./Feb. 1998, vol. 42:49-62, Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 16 pages, found at: http://www.imaging.org/ist/resources/tutorials/inkjet.cfm.
Oliveira, Monica S., “Iterated Stretching, Extensional Rheology and Formation of Beads-on-a-String Structures in Polymer Solutions,” Jan. 20, 2006, Special Issue of JNNFM on Extensional Flow, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 36 pages.
Owen, M., “Misting of non-Newtonian Liquids in Forward Roll Coating,” Jul. 13, 2011, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, vol. 166:1123-1128, 6 pages.
Shi, X.D., “A Cascade of Structure in a Drop Falling from a Faucet,” Jul. 8, 2004, vol. 265:219-222, Science, 4 pages.
Chapter 15, “Ink Jet Printing”, 14 pages, found at http://www.lintech.org/comp-per/15INK.pdf.
Marple, A. and Liu, Y.H.: “Characteristics of Laminar Jet Impactors”, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 8, No. 7, Jul. 1974, pp. 648-654.
Bailey, Adrian G.: “The Science and technology of electrostatic powder spraying, transport and coating”, Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 45, 1998, pp. 85-120.
Domnick, et al.: “The Simulation of Electrostatic Spray Painting Process with High-Speed Rotary Bell Atomizers. Part II: External Charging”, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. vol. 23, 2006, pp. 408-416, URL: http://www.ppsc-journal.com.
Kelly, Ryan T, et al.: “The ion funnel: theory, implementations, and applications”, Mass Spectrometry Reviews,vol. 29, 2010, pp. 294-312.
Crowe, Clayton et al.: “Multiphase Flows With Droplets and Particles”, CRC Press, LLC, 1998.
TSI Product Information for Small Scale Power Disperser 3433, https://www.tsi.com/products/aerosol-generators-dispersers/powder-generators/small-scale-powder-disperser-3433/ printed May 10, 2019.
Bingheng et al., “Development Trends in Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing,” Engineering 2015, 2015(1)(1); 85-89.
N. N.: “Filament Extension Atomizer, Next Generation Spray Technology for Difficult Spray Materials,” Sep. 8, 2016, found at https://www.parc.com/content/attachments/FEA-Spray_fact_sheet_20160808.pdf.
Mcclure, Max, “Stanford Researchers' Cooling Glove Better than Steroids—and Helps Solve Physiological Mystery Too”, Stanford Report, Aug. 29, 2012, 3 pages, retrieved from the Internet: http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/august/cooling-glove-research-082912.html, retrieved on Dec. 19, 2014.
Matheson, Rob, “Cool Invention Wins First Place at MADMEC”, MIT News Office, Oct. 17, 2013, 3 pages, retrieved from the Internet: http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2013/madmec-design-competition-1017, retrieved on Dec. 19, 2014.
Vanhemert, Kyle, “MIT Wristband Could Make AC Obsolete”, Wired.com, Oct. 30, 2013, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.wired.com/2013/10/an-ingenious-wristband-that-keeps-your-body-at-theperfect-temperature-no-ac-required/, retrieved on Dec. 19, 2014.
Francioso, L., “Flexible thermoelectric generator for ambient assisted living wearable biometric sensors”, Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, Issue 6, Mar. 15, 2011, pp. 3239-3243.
http://www.stacoolvest.com/, retrieved on Dec. 19, 2014.
http://www.steelevest.com/, retrieved on Dec. 19, 2014.
http://veskimo.com/, retrieved on Dec. 19, 2014.
http://glaciertek.com/, retrieved on Dec. 19, 2014.
Chen, A., “Dispenser-printed planar thick-film thermoelectric energy generators,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 21(10), 2011.
Hewitt, A.B., “Multilayered Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Composite Based Thermoelectric Fabrics,” Nano Letters, 12 (3), pp. 1307-1310, 2012.
Arens, E., “Partial- and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort—Part I: Uniform environmental conditions,” Journal of Thermal Biology, vol. 31, Issues 1-2, Jan. 2006, pp. 53-59.
Arens, E., “Partial- and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort—Part II: Non-uniform environmental conditions,” Journal of Thermal Biology, vol. 31, Issues 1-2, Jan. 2006, pp. 60-66.
Bullis, Kevin, “Expandable Silicon”, MIT Technology Review, Dec. 14, 2007, URL: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/409198/expandable-silicon/, retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 23, 2014.
“Ortho-Planar Spring”, BYI Mechanical Engineering Website, URL: http://compliantmechanisms.byu.edu/content/ortho-planar-spring, retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 23, 2014.
S.-J. Kim, J.-H. Wea and B.-J. Cho: “A wearable thermoelectric generator fabricated on a glass fabric,” Energy Environmental Science, 2014.
L. Francioso, C. De Pascali, A. Taurino, P. Siciliano, A. De Risi: “Wearable and flexible thermoelectric generator with enhanced package,” In Proc. SPIE 8763, Smart Sensors, Actuators, and MEMS VI, 876306, May 2013.
C. Huizenga, H. Zhang, E. Arens, D. Wang: “Skin and core temperature response to partial-and whole-body heating and cooling,” Journal of Thermal Biology, vol. 29, Issues 7-8, Oct.-Dec. 2004, pp. 549-558.
Sholin, V. et al: “High Work Function Materials for Source/Drain Contacts in Printed Polymer Thin Transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, 2008.
Zhuo, Li, et al.: “Highly Conductive, Flexible, Polyurethane-Based Adhesives for Flexible and Printed Electronics,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 23, p. 1459-1465, wileyonlinelibrary.com.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190061233 A1 Feb 2019 US