The present invention relates to an electrostatic precipitator and more particularly to an electrostatic precipitator and control system.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/401,082 entitled “Electronic Air Cleaners and Associated Systems and Methods” shows an electrostatic air cleaner collecting electrodes which carry a collection media, in particular, an open-cell structure that has been used to collect and remove particles such as dust, pollen, smoke, pathogens, and other contaminants from air by use of electric corona discharge, charging and collection components.
U.S. Ser. No. 14/401,802 shows an air cleaner that has an air cleaner that has an ionizing stage with exciting and corona electrodes and a collection stage with collecting and repelling electrodes. When a corona electrode is operated in an environment that includes certain chemicals, such as silicone, the electrodes may accumulate chemical particles which reduce performance and require that the electrodes be cleaned or replaced from time to time. J. H. Davidson, P. J. McKinney. Chemical Vapor Deposition in the corona discharge of electrostatic air cleaners. Journal of Electrostatics. 29(2): 102-110, 1998.
The electrostatic device described herein may be used as an electrostatic air cleaner and/or particle separator. It is an object to deliver air with predetermined air quality with changing intake air contamination level and air volume while maintaining optimum power consumption. Accordingly, an object is to improve energy consumption while optimizing the cleaning or separation efficiency.
It is an object to provide an electrostatic air cleaner that may be controlled to provide indoor (post-cleaner) air that has a specified level of contamination at a reduced power consumption.
It is an object to provide an electrostatic particle separator which may have the capacity to remove particles from an airflow and sort the particles by size.
It is an object to be able to rapidly change the voltage across the corona electrodes and across the repelling electrodes.
It is an object of the invention to extend the time between cleaning and/or replacement of the corona electrodes in an electrostatic air cleaner. This may be accomplished by reduction of the corona electrode voltage at times where the air quality requirements can met using a reduced corona voltage.
An electrostatic precipitator (ESP) is a filtration device that removes particles, like dust and smoke, from a flowing gas using the force of an induced electrostatic charge minimally impeding the flow of gases through the device. Electrostatic precipitators may be used as air filters, purifiers, and/or conditioners. An electrostatic precipitator may have several types of electrodes. One type of electrode is a corona electrode. Another type may be collecting electrodes. There may be other types of electrodes such as an exciting electrode and a repelling electrodes. Each type of electrode referred to herein may be a single electrode or plural electrodes. Typically electrodes of the same type of kept at the same potential. The exciting electrode may be a single piece structure or more than one piece electrically connected to each other. The corona electrodes may be a corona wire routed across the air flow path one time or more than one time and an electrostatic device may have one corona wire or multiple corona wires routed across an airflow path and electrically connected to each other. The term “electrode set” is intended to include one or more electrodes of the same type. Electrode sets may be mounted such that one or more electrodes sets may be removable to facilitate cleaning and/or replacement.
Air quality targets may vary depending on many factors. Maximum power usage is not necessarily needed in order to attain the required indoor air quality. The air quality output may be varied based on operating parameters.
At a lower velocity, the voltages on both the corona electrode and the repelling electrode may be lower than at higher air velocity. The air cleaning efficiency of the electrostatic air cleaner may depend on the air velocity. The higher the air velocity, the lower the air cleaning efficiency. Higher cleaning efficiency may be achieved by increasing either the corona electrode voltage or the repelling electrode voltage, or both.
If outdoor air is comparatively clean, indoor air quality levels may be attained at a lower filtration efficiency.
Large particles may be easier to collect (i.e., to remove from the air stream) than smaller particles. Therefore, with lower voltages on the corona or the repelling electrodes, a greater amount of large particles remain in the post-cleaner (post-particle separator) air stream than with higher voltages on the above electrodes. The voltage on the electrodes and power consumption of the electrodes may be adjusted to an optimum, not necessarily the maximum, level. Some industries like pharmaceuticals or bio-science environments where particles which may constitute pathogens or unwanted contamination are to be separated based on particle size range. This will allow separation efficiency control and control of particle size range separation in changing environments.
In an electrostatic precipitator, the corona electric power as well as the collecting electrode voltage is increased or decreased depending on the treatment amount and level of air contamination to be treated.
More specifically, the electrostatic air cleaner and particle separator may have a corona electrode for generating a stream of ions between the corona electrode and an exciting electrode facing the corona electrode. An electric power supply may apply voltages to both the corona electrodes and repelling electrodes. A collector section may include a set of the plate-like collecting electrodes and a set of plate-like repelling electrode. An air blower may be provided to create air flow in the device. The electrostatic air cleaner may have a particle separator function and may be capable of collecting or separating incoming particles. Another characteristic of the electrostatic air cleaner and particle separator is that it may include a power supply control component for increasing or decreasing the voltages on the above electrodes depending on the air volume of the air blower, air contamination, and resulting air purity or particle content level.
An electric power supply may impose a sufficient voltage differential between a corona electrode and a cooperating electrode to generate a coronal discharge. As a result, a stream of ions is generated. The ions may attach to particles contained in the air stream. The combined ions and particles are electrically charged. The charged components may flow with the air stream from an ionizing section toward the collection section where they may be attracted to and collected on collecting electrodes. Collection efficiency is generally the proportion of specified particles removed from a stream. The collection (filtration) efficiency of an electrostatic precipitator depends primarily on inter alia four factors:
Bigger particles may collect more ions on their surface and may obtain greater electrical charge. Therefore, bigger particles are subjected to greater electrical (Columbic) force, which may urge the charged particles toward the collecting electrodes.
Smaller particles may collect fewer ions and are thus under lower electrical force. Such smaller particles have a greater chance of escaping and appear in post-cleaner (post-particles separator) air.
The electrostatic air cleaner may remove particles of all size ranges, albeit, with varying removal (collecting) efficiency.
Outdoor air having a high contamination level may require air volume (air velocity) to be set to the maximum level (say 500 ft./min), and for the voltages on the corona electrode and the repelling electrode be set to the maximum allowable level. The allowable level is the voltage close to the breakdown voltage of the air between electrodes. At such levels, the electrostatic air cleaner will consume maximal power and, because it is working close to the breakdown voltage level, it may produce sporadic electrical discharges like sparks or arcing.
For example, if the outdoor air is rather dirty (for example, during rush hour) and contains contaminants (particles weight per volume, i.e., pout) about 200 micrograms per cubic meter. To achieve a level, Pin, of indoor air of 2 micrograms per cubic meter the filtration efficiency Eff should be no less than
Eff=(Pout−Pin)/Pout=0.99 (1)
In order to achieve that high filtration efficiency, corona discharge voltage is kept near the corona breakdown voltage. As described in the T. Wen article, high filtration efficiency requires high power consumption and a large collector plate area.
It has been found that at a different (better) air quality level, for example, such as in light traffic conditions, inlet air may contain fewer dust particles per cubic meter. In such conditions the filtration efficiency may be reduced to achieve the same acceptable outlet air quality. For example, relatively poorer inlet air quality may require a filtration efficiency of 99% and at a better inlet air quality the same outlet air quality may be obtained at a 98% filtration efficiency. To achieve this level of the filtration efficiency, the corona electrode voltage may be decreased somewhat, for example from a 4.8 kV level to a 4.1 kV level. Power consumption in one example may drop up to 83% and still achieve the same indoor air quality.
Filtration efficiency may be controlled by changing the voltage on the repelling electrode. The repelling electrode consumes much less energy than the corona electrodes and therefore the power supply for the voltage of the repelling electrode may be a lower inertia supply allowing the repelling electrode to be controlled by simpler and more cost efficient means than would be required for an electrode requiring greater power (for example, using a linear regulator).
The air flow rate through a precipitator may be adjusted by adjustment of a blower. An energy saving may be achieved by setting the blower to deliver less air volume. Generally filtration efficiency decreases when air flow rate is increased, however air flow rate may be dictated by factors other than filtration efficiency. With increased air velocity, the corona voltage on the corona and repelling electrode voltage may be required to increase to maintain efficiency. With a decreased air velocity, one or both voltages may be decreased and still maintain the same efficiency.
It is an object to provide a power control permitting rapid changes to the electrode voltage. Power control may be achieved by changing the voltage across the corona electrodes and/or the repelling electrodes. Changing voltage of the repelling electrodes may be effected more rapidly when a low inertia supply is utilized.
For better air quality control with rapidly changing conditions, voltage on the repelling electrode may follow the changing conditions quickly, while voltage on the corona electrodes follows this change at a slower pace (i.e., changes more slowly).
Another advantage of the design is the advanced control over contamination of the corona electrode. In operation, the corona electrode may be under high voltage and therefore may be subject to electrode contamination. During operation, chemicals, like silicon, may be deposited onto the corona electrodes, which decreases the electrostatic air cleaner's performance.
The rate of chemical deposition on the corona electrodes depends in part on the corona voltage. The deposition of such chemicals requires the cleaning or replacement of the corona electrodes once their performance drops. Due to this phenomenon, the corona electrode should be periodically cleaned or replaced.
Reducing the corona electrode voltage reduces deposits to the corona electrode and thus extends the time between cleaning or replacement.
An object is to have a low ozone generation at the corona discharge. This ozone generation may be reduced by the reduction of the corona voltage. This may be accomplished when the electrostatic precipitator works on lower voltage/power levels.
An electrostatic air cleaner may have an electrostatic precipitator having an air inlet, an air outlet and at least two electrode sets. At least one air quality sensor may be positioned to monitor precipitator outlet air quality. A control system may be connected to the sensors and a power source may be connected to at least two electrode sets and responsive to the control system wherein the control system may be connected to receive the signal from the sensor and adjust a voltage at a power source output. The control system may be connected to adjust the power source outputs to achieve an air quality goal at an improved energy expenditure.
The air quality sensor may be a particle size distribution sensor, a particle concentration sensor, and/or an air flow rate sensor. Exciting electrode(s) may be positioned to cooperate with a corona electrode set. The exciting electrode set may be grounded. One of the electrode sets may include a repelling electrode set. A collecting electrode set may be at or near ground potential. The power source may have a first output connected to a corona electrode and a second output connected to a repelling electrode. The power source output connected to the first set of electrodes is independent of the power source output connected to the second set of electrodes. The control system may be responsive to an elevation senor or an air flow rate sensor. The electrostatic precipitator may have an air flow generator connected to the power source. The air flow generator may be a fan. In a personal air cleaner, the air flow may be caused by a user breathing. The electrostatic air cleaner may be a particle separator.
Various objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, along with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like components.
Moreover, the above objects and advantages of the invention are illustrative, and not exhaustive, of those that can be achieved by the invention. Thus, these and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description herein, both as embodied herein and as modified in view of any variations which will be apparent to those skilled in the art
Before the present invention is described in further detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.
Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in the smaller ranges is also encompassed within the invention, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the invention.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, a limited number of the exemplary methods and materials are described herein.
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited. The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates, which may need to be independently confirmed.
The air purification device shown in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/401,082 and the T. Wen article show devices with high voltages applied to both the corona electrode and the repelling electrode and show grounded exciting electrode(s) and collecting electrode(s). The device shown in
It has been found that collection efficiency varies based on particle size. Even when the operating parameters of an electrostatic precipitator are set for high efficiency, larger particles settle closer to the leading end of a collector and smaller particles settle progressively further from the leading end of a collector. In this way the collector may operate as a particle separator. With a low repelling electrode voltage the collection efficiency is also low. As the repelling electrode voltage increases so does the collection efficiency. The efficiency for large particles will reach a maximum at a relatively lower voltage and as voltage is increased the particle size subjected to maximal efficiency decreases.
The power source 308 may generate high voltage that may be applied to the corona electrode 103 and to the repelling electrode 105 as shown in
These voltages may be controlled separately (independently) or together depending on the specific requirements.
The electrostatic air cleaning device 301 may have maximum filtration efficiency when the voltages on both the repelling and the corona electrodes are set at the maximum level.
The fan 303 speed and incoming air quality may be related to collection performance.
The air velocity of incoming air provided to the air velocity monitor 307 and may be processed by the control system 309. The control system 309 may adjust voltage levels for the power source 308 and either increase or decrease voltages across the corona 103 and repelling 105 electrodes in order to achieve air quality requirements, filtration efficiency, or energy savings.
An air quality sensor 305 such as an Amphenol SM-PWM-01A SMART Dust Sensor or a Waveshare Dust Sensor Detector Module with Sharp GP2Y1010AU0F may be used.
Lowering the air velocity generated by the fan 303 permits the electrostatic air cleaner 301 to maintain necessary filtration efficiency at a reduced voltage. The air velocity monitor 307 may send a corresponding signal to the control system 309. The control system 309 may decrease the voltages generated by the power source 308 in accordance with either a pre-programmed value, a measured air quality level, or a required filtration efficiency. Air quality may be measured by the sensor 306, and the filtration efficiency is a result of a calculation in accordance with equation (1).
The control system may also use other environmental parameters including, but not limited to, elevation, air humidity, etc. Additional measures of environmental parameters or conditions allows for complicated and comprehensive power source 308 control via control system 309.
At high elevations, corona electrode voltage should be decreased in accordance with the Paschen law. In thinner air, the corona onset voltage and air breakdown voltage may be lower than at sea level. An additional air pressure monitor (not shown) may measure air pressure and send a corresponding signal to the control system 309.
The electrostatic air cleaner 301 may change its filtration efficiency due to other factors such as electrode contamination or other factors that cannot be readily predicted. In this case, the control system 309 may sense the difference in the filtration efficiency and change power source 308 output voltages to a level where the filtration efficiency is satisfactory. Filtration efficiency may be controlled by changing the voltage on the repelling electrodes. The repelling electrodes consume much less energy than the corona electrodes and therefore the power source may include a power supply 308a (
The air cleaner 301 may be installed as a recirculating air cleaner having its air inlet and air outlet in a closed space, like a building or residence or an exterior intake system having an outdoor air inlet and an air outlet inside a closed space like a building or other enclosure. The particular air quality requirements and installation will inform the operation of the control system 309.
The techniques, processes and apparatus described may be utilized to control operation of any device and conserve use of resources based on conditions detected or applicable to the device.
The invention is described in detail with respect to preferred embodiments, and it will now be apparent from the foregoing to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects, and the invention, therefore, as defined in the claims, is intended to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Thus, specific apparatus for and methods of controlling electrostatic air cleaners have been disclosed. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the disclosure. Moreover, in interpreting the disclosure, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1650097 | Schmidt | Nov 1927 | A |
1931436 | Walther | Oct 1933 | A |
1957560 | Thompson | May 1934 | A |
2142129 | Wilhelm et al. | Jan 1939 | A |
2271597 | Lionel | Feb 1942 | A |
2526402 | Palmer | Oct 1950 | A |
2771963 | Warren | Nov 1956 | A |
2997130 | Nodolf | Aug 1961 | A |
3040497 | Schwab | Jun 1962 | A |
3157479 | Boles | Nov 1964 | A |
3452225 | Gourdine | Jun 1969 | A |
3504482 | Goettl | Apr 1970 | A |
3518462 | Brown | Jun 1970 | A |
3710588 | Martinez | Jan 1973 | A |
3751715 | Edwards | Aug 1973 | A |
3816980 | Schwab | Jun 1974 | A |
3831351 | Gibbs et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3959715 | Canning | May 1976 | A |
3960505 | Marks | Jun 1976 | A |
4057405 | Cheney et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4077785 | Hartshorn | Mar 1978 | A |
4098591 | Diepenbroek et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4124359 | Geller | Nov 1978 | A |
4160202 | James et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4166729 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4177047 | Goland | Dec 1979 | A |
4178156 | Tashiro et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4231766 | Spurgin | Nov 1980 | A |
4246010 | Honacker | Jan 1981 | A |
4259093 | Vlastos et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4259707 | Penney | Mar 1981 | A |
4264343 | Natarajan et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4290003 | Lanese | Sep 1981 | A |
4390830 | Laugesen | Jun 1983 | A |
4390831 | Byrd et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4433281 | Herklotz et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4486704 | Gustafsson et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4490159 | Malts | Dec 1984 | A |
4516991 | Kawashima | May 1985 | A |
4549887 | Joannou | Oct 1985 | A |
4604112 | Ciliberti et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4613346 | Reyes et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4643745 | Sakakibara | Feb 1987 | A |
4673416 | Sakakibara et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689056 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4719535 | Zhenjun et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4789801 | Lee | Dec 1988 | A |
4904283 | Hovis et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4980796 | Huggins | Dec 1990 | A |
5035728 | Fang | Jul 1991 | A |
5055118 | Nagoshi | Oct 1991 | A |
5068811 | Johnston et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5108470 | Pick | Apr 1992 | A |
5123524 | Lapeyre | Jun 1992 | A |
5251171 | Yamauchi | Oct 1993 | A |
5254155 | Mensi | Oct 1993 | A |
5330559 | Cheney et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332485 | Thompson | Jul 1994 | A |
5332562 | Kersey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336299 | Savell | Aug 1994 | A |
5395430 | Lundgren et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5466279 | Hattori et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5526402 | Dent et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5573577 | Joannou | Nov 1996 | A |
5628818 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5679121 | Kim | Oct 1997 | A |
5689177 | Nielsen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5707428 | Feldman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5807425 | Gibbs | Sep 1998 | A |
5827407 | Wang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5846302 | Putro | Dec 1998 | A |
5914454 | Imbaro et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922111 | Omi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5993521 | Loreth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6129781 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187271 | Lee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6245131 | Rippelmeyer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251171 | Marra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6504308 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527834 | Jörder et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6635106 | Katou et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656248 | Ilmasti | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660061 | Josephson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6764533 | Lobiondo | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790259 | Rittri et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805732 | Billiotte et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6831271 | Guevremont et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6888314 | Krichtafovitch et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6937455 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6984987 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008469 | Vetter et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019244 | Weaver | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7048780 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7112238 | Joannou | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7150780 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163572 | Liang et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7182805 | Reaves | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7264659 | Moshenrose | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7316735 | Tomimatsu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332019 | Bias et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351274 | Helt et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7393385 | Coffey et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7405672 | Taylor | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7431755 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7438743 | Strauss | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452410 | Bergeron et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7513933 | Coppom et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531027 | Tepper et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531028 | Mello et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534288 | Bromberg | May 2009 | B2 |
7553353 | Lepage | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569100 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582144 | Krigmont | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7582145 | Krigmont | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594958 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597750 | Krigmont | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7608135 | Mello et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7652431 | Krichtafovitch | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7717980 | Tepper et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736418 | Graß | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753994 | Motegi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758675 | Naito et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780761 | Gu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815719 | McKinney et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7833322 | Botvinnik et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857884 | Bohlen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857890 | Paterson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7896957 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914604 | Mello et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7942952 | Gale | May 2011 | B2 |
7998255 | Blum | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8043412 | Carlson | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049426 | Krichtafovitch | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092768 | Miller et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8211208 | Chan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241396 | Ursem et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8241397 | Gu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8277541 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8278797 | Sashida | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8349052 | Noh et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357233 | Chan | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366813 | Tokuda et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388900 | Benedek et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8404020 | Farmer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414687 | Li | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8454733 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460433 | Gefter et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8492733 | Klochkov et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8506674 | Brown-Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8551228 | Chan | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574345 | Ursem et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597415 | Noh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608826 | Al-Hamouz | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608838 | Wong et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623116 | Karlsson | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8624476 | Sekoguchi | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8663362 | Hagan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690996 | Ji et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702848 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8721775 | Chesebrough | May 2014 | B2 |
8736043 | Konno et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8741018 | Belcher et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760830 | Ikeda | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8845782 | Metteer | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873215 | Waddell | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8889079 | Zahedi | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8920537 | Seike | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8999040 | Johansson | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9028588 | Hess | May 2015 | B2 |
9089849 | Gu et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9216233 | Ota et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9308537 | Krichtafovitch | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9308538 | Genereux et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9327293 | McKinney et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9387487 | McGrath | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9441845 | Waddell | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9453651 | Park | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9457118 | Ota et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9488382 | Krichtafovitch | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9550189 | Oertmann | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9630186 | Back | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9797864 | McKinney | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20020134932 | Guevremont et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152890 | Leiser | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020190658 | Lee | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005824 | Katou et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030131727 | Fissan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040023411 | Fenn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040105802 | Duncan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040212329 | Krichtafovitch | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060177356 | Miller | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060185511 | Tepper | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060278074 | Tseng | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278082 | Tomimatsu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286017 | Hakka | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070148061 | Lau et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080030920 | Krichtafovitch | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080092743 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080121106 | Tepper et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080282772 | Petinarides | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090114090 | Gu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090235817 | Gu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235821 | Mochizuki et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090320426 | Braunecker et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100051709 | Krichtafovitch | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089240 | Krichtafovitch | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095848 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100155025 | Jewell-Larsen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100229724 | Tokuda et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243885 | Tepper et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110084611 | Schlitz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110286892 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120073436 | Li | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130021715 | Jewell-Larsen | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130047857 | Bohlen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047858 | Bohlen et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047859 | Bohlen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130074690 | Tomimatsu et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130220128 | Gu et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130284025 | Johansson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140150659 | McGrath | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174294 | Krichtafovitch | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140345463 | Urata | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140373717 | Wang | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150013541 | Vandenbelt et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150059580 | Clement | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150246595 | Forejt et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260147 | Schenk et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150323217 | Krichtafovitch | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150343454 | Tyburk | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013013 | Waddell | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160184834 | Genereux et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160236205 | Seeley et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170008008 | Umase | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170021363 | Krichtafovitch | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170072406 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170354977 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170354979 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170354980 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170354981 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2319732 | May 1999 | CN |
1926651 | Mar 2007 | CN |
201210251 | Mar 2009 | CN |
100552854 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101657247 | Jun 2013 | CN |
103706479 | Apr 2014 | CN |
105034756 | Nov 2015 | CN |
205066003 | Mar 2016 | CN |
1114935 | Nov 1991 | DE |
0332624 | Jan 1992 | EP |
2700452 | Feb 2014 | EP |
1490315 | Nov 1977 | GB |
2010025811 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2012039826 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2013173528 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2015084112 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wen, T.-Y., Wang, H., Krichtofovich, I., Mamishev, A., Novel Electrodes of an Electrostatic Precipitator for Air Filtration, submitted to Journal of Electronics Nov. 12, 2014, Journal of Electrostatics, 73 (2015), pp. 117-124. (Year: 2014). |
Wen, T., Wang, H., Krichtofovich, I., Mamishev, A., Novel Electrodes of an Electrostatic Precipitator for Air Filtration, submitted to Journal of Electronics Nov. 12, 2014, Seattle, Washington. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200188932 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |