The invention relates to an electrostatic sprayer for a coating product that comprises, inter alia, a rotating bowl and several electrodes distributed around the rotation axis of the bowl.
In the field of the electrostatic spraying of coating products, it is known to use an electrostatic field to improve the deposition performance on the objects to be coated.
In the case of a so-called “internal” or “contact” charge, the coating product comes into contact with an electrode brought to a non-zero electric potential, such that each droplet or particle of coating product sprayed is assigned an electrostatic charge q when it detaches from the rim of the rotating bowl. When such a droplet or particle thus charged is subjected to an electrostatic field, it undergoes a Coulomb force proportional to its charge and the intensity of this field. One drawback of this charge mode results from the fact that, if the coating product is conductive, which is in particular the case for hydrosoluble coating products, it is necessary to isolate the sprayer brought to the high voltage from its supply system for supplying coating product that is at the earth potential. To do that, it is known, for example from EP-A-0,274,322, to use one or more reservoirs onboard a multiaxial robot. This approach is generally satisfactory, but yields a relatively complex coating product spraying installation.
In the case of a so-called “external” or “Corona effect” charge, the droplets or particles of coating product that leave the edge of the rotating bowl pass in the vicinity of electrodes brought to a non-zero electric potential, such that they encounter ions bombarded by these electrodes and end up being electrostatically charged and attracted by the object to be coated, which is at the earth potential. This charging mode makes it possible to keep the coating product at the earth potential for spraying, without risk of short-circuiting the high-voltage generator. It is, however, very sensitive to dirtying of the electrodes. In particular, the charging phenomenon used to direct the droplets or particles toward the object to be coated depends on the creation of an electric current between the electrodes and their environment, in particular the object to be coated and the bowl, by ionization of the air around the electrodes. One can also see that the droplets or particles that leave the bowl become charged via the influence with a sign opposite that of the electric potential applied to the electrode. For example, if the electrode is brought to a negative potential, the droplets or particles leaving the bowl are positively charged. Yet in some cases, an electrode may begin to become dirty, for example due to movements of the sprayer in directions perpendicular to the rotation axis of the bowl, such that the electrodes penetrate deeply in the cloud of coating product emitted by the bowl and are covered with product. The ionization current emitted by the electrodes may also decrease in intensity due to variations in the distance between the sprayer and the object to be coated or due to an obstacle or a cloud of already charged droplets forming a screen between these electrodes and this object. These phenomena are difficult to foresee and cause runaway of the dirtying and a sharp drop in the electrostatic charge of the cloud of coating product. Indeed, if the ionization current decreases, the droplets or particles which, upon leaving the bowl, are charged with a sign opposite that of the electrodes, are attracted by these electrodes and tend to be deposited thereon and on their mechanical supports. Runaway of the dirtying phenomenon then occurs and the particles that quickly cover the electrodes further decrease the ionization current, to the point that the charge by Corona effect is stopped. It is then necessary to interrupt production to clean the electrodes. This requires constant monitoring of the installation, since if an intervention does not occur quickly, the parts to be treated are not correctly coated and must be subject to a recovery procedure, which is both long and costly.
The invention more particularly aims to resolve these drawbacks by proposing a new electrostatic sprayer for coating product with external charging, with a reliabilized operation.
To that end, the invention relates to an electrostatic sprayer for coating products with an external charge comprising a bowl rotating around a rotation axis, means for driving the rotation of the bowl around this axis, several first electrodes distributed around this axis and each able to emit, when the sprayer is operating and at least partially toward an object to be coated, a first stream of ions from a first tip, the first tips being fitted into a first circle centered on the rotation axis and perpendicular thereto. According to the invention, the sprayer comprises second electrodes each able to emit, when the sprayer is operating and primarily or exclusively toward the edge of the bowl, a second stream of ions, with the same sign as the ions of the first ion streams, from second tips fitted into a second circle centered on the rotation axis, perpendicular thereto and the radius of which is different from that of the first circle. Furthermore, each second tip is positioned, in a plane radial to the rotation axis, in a dihedron, the origin of which is on an axis extending a first electrode toward the rear, the apical angle of which is equal to 90° and which is centered on an axis oriented toward the edge of the bowl.
Owing to the invention, the second electrodes makes it possible to create, using the second stream of ions, an electrostatic field between their tips and the bowl, this electrostatic field being less influenced by outside phenomena, whether aeraulic or electrostatic, that the new electrostatic field has created between the first electrodes and the object to be coated. In other words, the ionization phenomenon that exists in the vicinity of the second electrodes is more constant than that which exists in the vicinity of the first electrodes. Thus, the polarity of these droplets or particles is reversed due to their encounter with the ion current from the second electrodes, and as a result of this reversal and polarity, these droplets or particles are electrostatically pushed back by the first and second electrodes, which have a lower risk of becoming dirty than in the known external charging installations.
According to advantageous but optional aspects of the invention, such a sprayer may incorporate one or more of the following features, considered in any technically allowable combination:
The invention also relates to a spraying installation for a coating product that comprises at least one sprayer as described above.
The invention will be better understood and other advantages thereof will appear more clearly in light of the following description of four embodiments of a sprayer according to its principle, provided solely as an example and done in reference to the appended drawings, in which:
The installation 1 illustrated in
The installation 1 also comprises a sprayer 10 of the rotating electrostatic type, which comprises a bowl 20 forming a member for spraying a liquid coating product and supported by a body 30 inside which a turbine 40 is mounted for driving the rotation of the bowl 20 around an axis X30 of the sprayer 10 that is defined by the body 30. The turbine 40 is shown in dotted lines in
The front of the sprayer 10 is defined as its side turned toward the objects O to be coated. The rear of the sprayer 10 is defined as its side turned opposite these objects. Thus, the part 32 is oriented toward the rear of the sprayer 10. During operation of the installation 1, a front part of the sprayer is closer to the object O being coated than a rear part.
The body 30 also contains a high-voltage unit 60 that powers eight electrodes 100 that are each mounted at the end of a finger 110 made from an electrically insulating material. Reference A110 denotes the longitudinal axis of a finger 110. As more particularly shown by
Skirt air outlet orifices 36 are provided on the body 30, around the bowl 20, and allow the flow of air jets J for configuring a cloud of droplets G leaving the edge 22 of the bowl 20.
During normal operation, and as shown in
As shown in
This corresponds to the traditional operation of an external charge electrostatic sprayer, and the electrodes 100 make up first electrodes that emit a stream of ions making up the ionization current I1, at least partially toward the object O to be coated.
The tips 102 of the electrodes 100 are distributed on an imaginary circle C100 that is centered on the axis X30 and perpendicular thereto. Reference R100 denotes the radius of this circle.
As shown in
To avoid this runaway phenomenon of dirtying, each finger 110 is equipped with a second electrode 200 that extends along an axis A200 perpendicular to the axis A110 and the tip 202 of which is oriented toward the edge 22 of the bowl 20. In practice, the axis A200 is oriented toward the bowl, more specifically the edge 22, and the electrode 200 is rectilinear.
A finger 110 therefore constitutes a mechanical support and positioning member, relative to the body 30 and the bowl 20, of an electrode 100 and an electrode 200.
In practice, as emerges from
A stopper 204 closes off each orifice 111 opposite the tip 202 of the electrode 200 that it contains. This stopper is made from an electrically insulating material, preferably the same as that of the finger 110.
During operation, and according to a phenomenon similar to that explained regarding the electrodes 100, an ionization phenomenon of the air occurs near the tip 202 of each electrode 200, such that an ionization current I2 develops, this current flowing toward the closest mass, i.e., the edge 22 of the bowl 20. The total intensity of the current emitted by a finger 110 increases by 10 to 20% relative to the traditional configuration. In other words, the sum of the intensities of the currents I1 and I2 emitted from the two tips 102 and 202 supported by this finger is approximately 60 μA.
It will be noted that this ionization current I2 is only slightly disrupted by the potential presence of the obstacle formed by the cloud N of droplets previously negatively charged near the end 114 of the finger 110 or due to the fact that a quantity of paint is deposited in the basin 112 of the finger 110.
In other words, the electrostatic field created between each electrode 200 and the bowl 20 is influenced by the outside conditions less than that created from an electrode 100. The electrostatic field at the second electrodes 200 is said to be less “susceptible” than that at the first electrodes 100. Thus, the ionization phenomenon that occurs from the tips 202 of the electrodes 200 is substantially constant, irrespective of the electrostatic and aeraulic environment of the end 114.
As a result, when the droplets G, which are positively charged, leave the edge 22, they necessarily encounter negative ions coming from the ion current I2, to the point that their polarity is reversed and they become negative. They are therefore necessarily pushed back by the end 114 of a finger 110 that includes two electrodes 100 and 200 at a negative potential, even if the ionization phenomenon due to the tips 102 of the first electrodes 100 is only partial, as indicated above, in the configuration of
The tips 202 of the second electrodes 200 are distributed on a circle C200 that is centered on the axis X30 and perpendicular thereto, like the circle C100. Reference R200 denotes the radius of the circle C200.
The radii R100 and R200 are different. More specifically, the radius R200 is smaller than the radius R100. In other words, the tips 202 of the electrodes 200 are situated, radially relative to the axis X30, inside the tips 102 of the electrodes 100.
In the plane of
In the plane of
It will be understood that the effectiveness of the second electrodes 200 is reinforced by the fact that their tips 202 are oriented globally toward the bowl 20. One should therefore ensure proper positioning of each of these electrodes in a radial direction relative to the axis A110 of the finger 110 on which is mounted.
Yet it is sometimes necessary to disassemble the fingers 110 from the sprayer 10 for maintenance operations. The mounting of each of the fingers 110 on the body 30 inches a satisfactory orientation owing to indexing means of each finger 110 in rotation around its axis A110.
As shown in
In the second to fourth embodiments of the invention illustrated in
In the second embodiment, each finger 110 is equipped, near an electrode 100, with two electrodes 200 and 200′ that are similar to the electrode 200 of the first embodiment and the tips 202 and 202′ of which are positioned, systematically relative to a plane P200 that is radial with respect to the axis X30 and containing the axis A110, inside a dihedron D300 defined as in the first embodiment.
In the third embodiment shown in
The electrodes C300 are used to push back the droplets of coating product that could come back toward the surface of the part 110 turned opposite the bowl 20, in particular due to movements of the sprayer 10 within a cloud of droplets being sprayed toward an object O.
In the first three embodiments, the second electrodes 200 and optionally 200′, or even the third electrodes 300, are supported by the fingers 110, which also support the first electrodes 100.
In the fourth embodiment, the electrodes 100 are supported by fingers 110, while the electrodes 200 are supported by fingers 210 separate from the fingers 100. This makes it possible to position the electrodes 200 independently of the electrodes 100, and if applicable, to have a number of electrodes 200 different from the number of electrodes 100 as in the example of
The invention has been described above in the case of a sprayer for a liquid coating product. It is also applicable to an externally charged rotating electrostatic sprayer for a powdered spraying product.
The technical features of the embodiments and alternatives considered above may be combined.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1361039 | Nov 2013 | FR | national |
This is a National Stage application of PCT international application PCT/EP2014/074343, filed on Nov. 12, 2014 which claims the priority of French Patent Application No. 1361039 entitled “ELECTROSTATIC SPRAYER OF COATING PRODUCT AND PROJECTION ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A SPRAYER”, filed Nov. 12, 2013, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/074343 | 11/12/2014 | WO | 00 |