The present invention relates generally to micro-electromechanical (MEM) drop-on-demand liquid emission devices such as, for example, ink jet printers, and more particularly such devices which employ an electrostatic actuator for driving liquid from the device.
Drop-on-demand liquid emission devices with electrostatic actuators are known for ink printing systems. U.S. Pat. No. 5,644,341 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,668,579, which issued to Fuji et al. on Jul. 1, 1997 and Sep. 16, 1997, respectively, disclose such devices having electrostatic actuators composed of a single diaphragm and opposed electrode. The diaphragm is distorted by application of a voltage differential between two electrodes. Relaxation of the diaphragm expels an ink droplet from the device. Other devices that operate on the principle of electrostatic attraction are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,739,831, U.S. Pat. No. 6,127,198, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,318,841; and in U.S. Publication No. 2001/0023523.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,345,884 teaches a device having an electrostatically deformable membrane with an ink refill hole in the membrane. An electric field applied across the ink deflects the membrane and expels an ink drop.
IEEE Conference Proceeding “MEMS 1998,” held Jan. 25-29, 2002 in Heidelberg, Germany, entitled “A Low Power, Small, Electrostatically-Driven Commercial Inkjet Head” by S. Darmisuki, et al., discloses a head made by anodically bonding three substrates, two of glass and one of silicon, to form an ink ejector. Drops from an ink cavity are expelled through an orifice in the top glass plate when a membrane formed in the silicon substrate is first pulled down to contact a conductor on the lower glass plate and subsequently released. There is no electric field in the ink. The device occupies a large area and is expensive to manufacture.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,357,865 by J. Kubby et al. teaches a surface micro-machined drop ejector made with deposited polysilicon layers. Drops from an ink cavity are expelled through an orifice in an upper polysilicon layer when a lower polysilicon layer is first pulled down to contact a conductor and is subsequently released.
One such device is disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/155,306 filed in the names of Gilbert A. Hawkins and James M. Chwalek on May 23, 2002. That device includes an electrostatic drop ejection mechanism that employs an electric field for driving liquid from a chamber in the device. Structurally coupled, separately addressable first and second dual electrodes are positioned on opposed sides of a third electrode. The first and second electrodes are movable in a first direction to draw liquid into the chamber and in a second direction to emit a liquid drop from the chamber.
In above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,127,198, air trapped between the distortable diaphragm and the opposed, fixed electrode is compressed when a voltage is applied to the electrode. The air chamber must have a relatively large volume to accommodate the compressed air; reducing the number of ejection nozzles that can be located in a given area.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,212 provides a vented space between a distortable diaphragm and the opposed, fixed electrode. The vent is a very thin slot around the perimeter of the device. Because the mechanism relies on hydrophobic layers between the electrodes to keep the chamber clear of fluid, the cross-sectional area of the perimeter vent gap is by necessity insufficient to provide adequate venting. The thickness of the vent is given in the patent as 0.5 μm. Even assuming that the entire perimeter on an 80 μm device were vented (although it is likely that, say, 25% of the perimeter would be used to anchor the device), the area of the vent would be only about 120 μm2; as calculated below by approximating the area as the surface area of a cylinder:
The perimeter of the vent would be approximately 240 μm, for an area-to-perimeter ratio of 0.5 μm. This would be a very slowly venting device; and therefore would be slow to fire and refill.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a micro-electromechanical (MEM) drop-on-demand liquid emission device of the type discussed that is able to actuate and refill rapidly by providing a vent hole in the rear of the fixed electrode. As an example, a 20 μm diameter vent hole in the fixed electrode provides an area of 300 μm2 with a perimeter of only 60 μm for an area-to-perimeter ratio of 5 μm. Thus, all other things being equal, the present invention would be able to actuate and refill approximately 10 times faster than would the device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,212.
According to a feature of the present invention, an emission device for ejecting a liquid drop includes a first chamber of variable volume adapted to receive a liquid. The chamber has a nozzle orifice through which a drop of received liquid can be emitted. An electrically addressable, deformable electrode is associated with the first chamber such that movement of the deformable electrode in a first direction increases the first chamber's volume to draw liquid into the first chamber and movement of the deformable electrode in a second direction decreases the first chamber's volume to emit a drop of liquid from the first chamber through the nozzle orifice. A fixed electrode, of predetermined perimeter, opposes to the deformable electrode to define a second chamber there between such that control of relative voltage differences between the movable and the fixed electrodes selectively moves the deformable electrode in one of the first and second directions. The variable volume contains a dielectric material and is vented to a source of such dielectric material through an opening of predetermined cross-sectional area in the fixed electrode. The ratio of the cross-sectional area of the opening to the perimeter of the fixed electrode is greater than 0.5 μm and is preferably about 5 μm.
As described in detail herein below, the present invention provides a novel drop-on-demand liquid emission device. The most familiar of such devices are used as printheads in ink jet printing systems. Many other applications are emerging which make use of devices similar to ink jet printheads, but which emit liquids (other than inks) that need to be finely metered and deposited with high spatial precision.
Drop-on-demand liquid emission device 10 includes a plurality of electrostatic drop ejection mechanisms 20.
A portion of deformable electrode 28 is sealingly attached to outer wall 25 to define a liquid chamber 30 adapted to receive the liquid, such as for example ink, to be ejected from nozzle orifice 24. The liquid is drawn into chamber 30 through one or more refill ports 32 from a supply, not shown, typically forming a meniscus in the nozzle orifice. Ports 32 are sized as discussed below. Dielectric material fills the region on the side of deformable electrode 28 opposed to chamber 30. The dielectric material is preferably air or other dielectric gas, although a dielectric liquid may be used.
Typically, deformable electrode 28 is made of a somewhat flexible conductive material such as polysilicon, or a combination of layers having a central conductive layer surrounded by an upper and lower insulating layer. For example an alternative electrode 28 comprises a thin film of polysilicon stacked between two thin films of silicon nitride, each film for example, being one micron thick. In the latter case, the nitride acts to stiffen the polysilicon film and to insulate it from liquid in the chamber 30.
Addressable electrode 28 is preferably at least partially flexible and is spaced from a fixed electrode 34 such that the two electrodes are generally axially aligned with nozzle orifice 24.
Fixed electrode 34 is preferably made from a conductive central body, and is rigidly attached to walls 26. A first passivation layer 35 provides insulation of electrode 34 from the structural supports 44, while a second passivation layer 36 provides insulation of fixed electrode 34 from deformable electrode 28 during pulldown, when the two electrodes will be brought into mechanical contact. The thicknesses of passivation layers 35 and 36 are determined by the breakdown voltages of the passivation materials and the voltages applied when the electrodes are brought into contact.
Referring to
Subsequently (say, several microseconds later) deformable electrode 28 is de-energized, that is, the potential difference between electrodes 28 and 34 is made zero. Deformable electrode 28 begins to move from the position illustrated in
Referring again to
A second fluid path 42 shown in
Reference is made to commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/155,306 filed in the names of Gilbert A. Hawkins and James M. Chwalek on May 23, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4908679 | Vora et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5300444 | Hachisuka et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5644341 | Fujii et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5668579 | Fujii et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5739831 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764258 | Hetzer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5804084 | Nasby et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5890745 | Kovacs | Apr 1999 | A |
5907791 | Cappuzzo et al. | May 1999 | A |
6082208 | Rodgers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6127198 | Coleman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174820 | Habermehl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6235212 | Silverbrook | May 2001 | B1 |
6318841 | Coleman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332669 | Kato et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345884 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357865 | Kubby et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
20010023523 | Kubby et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9009677 | Aug 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040119782 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |