Claims
- 1. An electrostatically sprayable insecticidal formulation suitable for use in an electrostatic spraying apparatus to spray plants to give an even coating of the insecticide on the leaves of said plants, the formulation having after spraying a spray droplet size in the range of from about 50 to about 200 microns in diameter, and consisting essentially of a solution of from 0.5 to 50% by weight of an insecticide in an inert organic solvent medium, said medium being a mixture of inert organic solvents or a mixture of inert organic solvents and an antistatic agent, formulated so that the formulation has a resistivity at 20.degree. C. in the range 1.times.10.sup.6 to 1.times.10.sup.10 ohm centimeters, and a viscosity at 20.degree. C. in the range 5 to 50 centistokes, and the insecticide being of formula: ##STR6## where R is hydrogen, and R.sup.1 is selected from the group consisting of: (i) a group of formula: ##STR7## where X is selected from hydrogen, chlorine and methyl, and (ii) a group of formula: ##STR8## where Y and Z are selected from halogen, methyl, and a group of formula R.sup.2 R.sup.3 C.dbd.CH--, where R.sup.2 and R.sup.3 are selected from chlorine, bromine, methyl, ethyl, halo-substituted methyl and halo-substituted ethyl.
- 2. A formulation as claimed in claim 1 having a viscosity at 20.degree. C. in the range 5 to 25 centistokes.
- 3. An electrostatically sprayable insecticidal formulation as claimed in claim 1 consisting essentially of a solution of from 0.5 to 10% by weight of an insecticide selected from the group consisting of permethrin and cypermethrin in an organic solvent medium comprising from 15 to 25% of an alcoholic or ketonic solvent, from 10 to 20% by weight of a hydrocarbon solvent and from 55 to 65% by weight of cottonseed oil, the formulation having a viscosity at 20.degree. C. in the range 5 to 50 centistokes and a resistivity at 20.degree. C. in the range 10.sup.6 to 5.times.10.sup.8 ohm centimeters.
- 4. A method of treating a plant infested by insects, said method consisting essentially of the step of electrostatically spraying the plant with an insecticidally effective amount of a formulation as claimed in claim 1 so as to provide an even coating of the insecticide on the leaves of said plant.
Priority Claims (1)
| Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
| 52970/77 |
Dec 1977 |
GBX |
|
Parent Case Info
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 969,434, filed Dec. 14, 1978, now abandoned.
US Referenced Citations (2)
| Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
|
3996375 |
Frensch et al. |
Dec 1976 |
|
|
4173651 |
Muramoto et al. |
Nov 1979 |
|
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
| Number |
Date |
Country |
| 1209524 |
Oct 1970 |
GBX |
| 1413491 |
Nov 1975 |
GBX |
| 1569707 |
Jun 1980 |
GBX |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
| Entry |
| Chemical Abstracts 84:131121x (1976). |
| Chemical Abstracts 87:97291c (1977). |
| Maas-"ULV Application and Formulation (pp. 61-71) Techniques", N.V. Philips-Duphar, Amsterdam, Neth. (1971). |
| Law et al.-Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 9, 1966, pp. 501-506. |
Continuations (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
| Parent |
969434 |
Dec 1978 |
|