This application relates to an elevator car having lateral suspension provided by electromagnets mounted on the car and a car follower to create a repulsive magnetic force. Preferably, the car follower has a pair of electromagnets which are interconnected to move together.
Elevator cars are typically guided for movement upwardly and downwardly by passive suspension systems including spring biased rollers moving along rails. One challenge faced by elevator designers is the control of lateral vibration. Any vibrations that occur as the car moves laterally reduce the ride quality, which is undesirable.
One problem with addressing lateral vibrations is that the vibrations occur across a range of frequencies. Fully addressing these vibrations is not possible with typical passive suspension systems. In particular, to address low frequency vibration, a high spring stiffness for the passive suspension would be necessary. On the other hand, a high spring stiffness would not address the high frequency vibration, which would require a lower spring stiffness. Thus, passive suspension systems have not been able to address a wide band of vibration frequencies.
It has been proposed to utilize magnetic suspension members in combination with these passive suspensions. These combined systems have not always been fully acceptable either. Moreover, these systems have a resultant noise which would be undesirable.
Other suspensions rely solely upon magnetic suspension elements. These suspension elements have typically used an attractive magnetic force. That is, a steel rail is provided, and an electromagnet is provided on the car. The electromagnet is attracted to the steel rail. An electromagnet and guide rail are associated with each side of the car. Thus, in an idealized situation, two opposed attractive forces center the car between the two rails. However, in practice, this system would actually be unstable. Should the car move slightly toward either side, which would be the natural effect of an additional lateral force, then the system would become quickly unstable. In particular, the attractive force between the rail and the electromagnet is proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance. As the car moves closer to one of the two rails, the attractive force would also increase. Thus, should the car move closer to one rail, the attractive force pulling the car further toward that rail would also begin to overcome the attractive force pulling the car toward the other rail. One other problem with this type of system is poor controllability. There could be a good deal of power loss in the steel rail, and current saturation. Further, the shape of the rail would make controllability difficult.
A system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,510,925 would rely upon repulsive magnetic forces. A repulsive magnetic force would have the opposite correction to an attractive magnetic force, and would thus tend to center a car.
The system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,510,925 has a separate car follower associated with each of the two guide rails. These car followers are connected through springs to the car. Thus, the car followers are not free to move relative to the car, and are each independent of the other. These facts would make it more difficult to control the lateral vibration, and could, in fact, cause additional lateral and even vertical vibrations.
In a disclosed embodiment of this invention, a car follower portion having an electromagnet faces an electromagnet associated with the car at each of a pair of guide rails. A repulsive force is created between the electromagnets on the car follower portion and the car. The electromagnets can be better controlled than permanent magnets. A control can adjust the field strength of the electromagnets to control the magnitude of the repulsive force. Thus, the use of electromagnets associated with both of the follower portions and the car provides benefits over the prior art.
In another feature, and in the preferred embodiment, the car follower portions associated with the two guide rails are interconnected into a single car follower. The car follower is able to move relative to the car in the horizontal plane which is perpendicular to the axis of movement of the car. However, the car follower does move with the car along the direction of travel. The car follower is guided along both rails. Should there be a lateral vibration, the repulsive force between the car follower and the car will ensure that this force will be dampened or reduced. A more standard, or even rigid, guide can be used between the guide rails and the car follower. While the feature of the single car follower is preferably utilized with electromagnets, it can also provide benefits when used with permanent magnets.
These and other features of this invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
The car follower 22 includes a horizontally extending crossing member 32 connected at a universal joint 34 to a vertically extending member 36. The electromagnets 24 are mounted on the vertically extending member 36.
The electromagnets 24 sit opposed to an electromagnet 26 mounted on a vertically extending bar 40 associated with the car 28. As shown in
The electromagnets 24 sit opposed to an electromagnet 26 mounted on a vertically extending bar 40 associated with the car 28. As shown in
While it is perhaps easier to visualize movement of car follower 22, in fact, it would probably be more accurate to state that during operation, the car 28 is free to move relative to the car follower 22. The car follower 22 would tend to be guided between the guide rails 25 and thus the adjustment due to the repulsive force on the electromagnets 24 and 26 will likely cause the car 28 to move laterally between the car follower electromagnets 24.
With the present invention, a repulsive force is provided and maintained between the electromagnets associated with the car and the car follower. As a lateral vibration affects either the car follower or the car, the repulsive magnetic force would tend to center the car between the opposed rails. In this way, lateral vibrations will not affect the ride quality for the elevator car.
The control shown schematically at 30 in
Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a person of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/19501 | 6/20/2003 | WO | 00 | 12/19/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/007549 | 1/27/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4838172 | Morishita et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5141082 | Ishii | Aug 1992 | A |
5308938 | Roberts et al. | May 1994 | A |
5368132 | Hollowell | Nov 1994 | A |
5810120 | Jamieson | Sep 1998 | A |
5864102 | Jamieson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6305502 | He et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6510925 | DeJong | Jan 2003 | B1 |
20020017434 | Orrman et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20080110701 | Ito et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090103227 | Morishita | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1262439 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 067 083 | Mar 2005 | EP |
01156293 | Jun 1989 | JP |
7-215634 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10245178 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10245179 | Sep 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060175150 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |