1. Field
The present invention relates to an elevator and an arrangement for stopping an elevator car in an emergency braking situation.
2. Description of Related Art
In the case of more sophisticated elevators, deceleration of the elevator car in normal situations, i.e. when the elevator car is to be brought to a stop at a landing, is usually implemented using motor braking. However, according to regulations, elevators must be provided with a device capable of emergency braking, which is activated in abnormal situations, such as situations caused by power failures or certain disturbances affecting safety. The emergency brake used is e.g. the normal elevator brake, which keeps the elevator car stationary in normal situations when the car is at a landing. Especially in elevators without counterweight, but also in counterweighted traction sheave elevators having a counterweight that is particularly light in relation to the elevator car, emergency braking of the elevator car during upward travel together with the effect of gravity may produce a deceleration of the elevator car large enough to cause a potential risk to passenger safety. In fast counterweighted elevators, as a result of sudden stopping of the traction sheave, the ropes will start sliding at a high speed while the frictional grip is reduced, which again may cause new problems.
The object of the present invention is to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks and to create a simple arrangement for stopping a moving elevator car in the event of an emergency stop, an arrangement that is reliable and safe for the passengers. The invention aims at a solution where the elevator car of an elevator without counterweight is not decelerated too effectively or not necessarily decelerated at all by application of an emergency brake during upward travel. A further object of the arrangement of the invention is to allow an elevator car traveling upwards in an emergency braking situation to continue moving upwards at least partially freely in spite of the braking, the movement of the car being thus decelerated safely and slowly and finally stopped due to gravity.
The elevator and the arrangement are discussed below. Some embodiments are characterized by what is disclosed in the claims.
Inventive embodiments are also presented in the description part and drawings of the present application. The inventive content disclosed in the application can also be defined in other ways than is done in the claims below. The inventive content may also consist of several separate inventions, especially if the invention is considered in the light of explicit or implicit sub-tasks or with respect to advantages or sets of advantages achieved. In this case, some of the attributes contained in the claims below may be superfluous from the point of view of separate inventive concepts. Within the framework of the basic concept of the invention, Similarly, the various details described in conjunction with each embodiment example features of different embodiments of the invention can be applied used in conjunction with other embodiment examples as wells.
The starting point in the implementation of the inventive concept is to avoid the decelerating effect of the brake on the elevator car when the elevator car is moving upwards, but the invention can also be applied in a way that allows the decelerating effect of the brake on the elevator car to be transmitted so as to decelerate upward motion of the elevator car with less force than its downward motion. In a preferred case, the invention can be implemented using a coupling between the rotary motions of the traction sheave and brake wherein the transmission of force from the brake to the traction sheave is implemented using a one-way clutch or the like, whereby the force is only transmitted when the traction sheave is rotating in one direction of rotation.
The arrangement of the invention has the advantage that the movement of the elevator car in the case of elevators without counterweight is not decelerated too fast in emergency braking situations, and thus the passengers in the car undergo no risk due to sudden stopping of the elevator car. Besides a safe structure, an additional advantage is a dependable structure that is reliable in operation.
In the following, the invention will be described in detail by referring to an embodiment example and the attached drawings, wherein
The elevator receives its hoisting power from the hoisting machine 5 by virtue of the friction between the traction sheave 6 and the hoisting ropes 3. The elevator car suspension presented in
Fitted on the central axle 10 is also the brake 19, which consists of a brake wheel 15 fitted on the axle 10 and brake shoes 16 arranged to be pressed into engagement with the brake wheel 15 when the brake 19 of the elevator is activated. This brake 19 is used as the normal holding brake of the elevator to hold the elevator car 1 stationary at the landing and also as an emergency brake in abnormal situations. The brake may have any suitable construction provided that the brake is adapted to prevent and brake the rotary motion of the axle 10.
When the machine is operated to drive the elevator car 1 in the up direction, the hoisting machine 5 is arranged to rotate the inner ring 11 of the one-way clutch clockwise in the situation illustrated in
In an emergency braking situation, the brake 19 is arranged to stop the rotation of the axle 10 and therefore also the rotation of the inner ring 11 of the one-way clutch. However, in an emergency braking situation during upward travel, i.e. when the axle 10 is rotating clockwise in the case illustrated in
Correspondingly, when the emergency brake is engaged during downward travel, the wedge rollers 13 remain wedged between the inner ring 11 of the one-way clutch and the traction sheave 6, and consequently the brake 19 stops the traction sheave 6 and therefore also the movement of the elevator car 1.
It is obvious to a person skilled in the art that the invention is not exclusively limited to the example described above, but that it can be varied within the scope of the claims presented below. Thus, for example, the one-way clutch used in the arrangement may be different from the above-described wedge-roller one-way clutch. It may be some other type of wedge-roller one-way clutch or even a one-way clutch or corresponding element of a completely different type, e.g. a friction-element one-way clutch.
It is likewise obvious to a skilled person that the suspension of the elevator car can be implemented in a manner differing from the above description. A desired suspension ratio can be achieved e.g. by adding diverting pulleys and disposing them differently.
It is further obvious to a skilled person that, instead of being used in an elevator without counterweight, the arrangement of the invention can equally well be used in a counterweighted elevator.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20060329 | Apr 2006 | FI | national |
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/F12007/000080, filed on Apr. 2, 2007 (also known as World Intellectual Property Organization International Publication No. WO 2007/113374 A1), in the Receiving Office of the National Board of Patents and Registration of Finland (“NBPRF”); and claims priority from that application and Finnish Patent Application No. 20060329: filed on Apr. 4, 2006, in the NBPRF; the entire contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1834937 | Buettell | Dec 1931 | A |
1921554 | Wellman et al. | Aug 1933 | A |
2225278 | Robin et al. | Dec 1940 | A |
3762512 | McIntyre | Oct 1973 | A |
4412600 | Ito et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4977982 | Bialy et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5007505 | Lindegger | Apr 1991 | A |
5230406 | Poon | Jul 1993 | A |
5310022 | Sheridan et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324007 | Freneix | Jun 1994 | A |
5363942 | Osada | Nov 1994 | A |
5370208 | De Jong | Dec 1994 | A |
5386889 | Pipes | Feb 1995 | A |
5595272 | Zhou | Jan 1997 | A |
5638929 | Park | Jun 1997 | A |
5695031 | Kurita et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5779588 | Mann et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788018 | Mendelsohn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6170625 | Tanaka | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6374953 | Casas | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374964 | Mustalahti et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
20030085078 | Simmonds et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050126862 | Ito | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060289240 | Sakita | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070089937 | Ito | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070170409 | Ito | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070227833 | Aulanko et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080264729 | Mustalahti et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 264 615 | Sep 1974 | DE |
0 687 643 | Dec 1995 | EP |
1 457 700 | Sep 2004 | EP |
20041044 | Jun 2004 | FI |
2489800 | Mar 1982 | FR |
2 001 214 | Jan 1979 | GB |
06-199483 | Jul 1994 | JP |
2003-042202 | Feb 2003 | JP |
1004250 | Mar 1983 | SU |
1252298 | Aug 1986 | SU |
1744027 | Jun 1992 | SU |
WO 2005050051 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005121006 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006010781 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006038284 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EPO, Machine Translation, FR 2489800 A, Aug. 11, 2014, pp. 1-6. |
Office Action from the European Patent Office dated Jul. 27, 2009, for counterpart European Patent Application No. 07 704 786.8-1256. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090223748 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/FI2007/000080 | Apr 2007 | US |
Child | 12230836 | US |