This invention generally relates to elevator brakes and, more particularly to elevator machine brakes including a piezoelectric brake actuator.
Elevator systems are widely known and used. Typical arrangements include an elevator cab that moves between landings in a building, for example, to transport passengers or cargo to different levels in the building. A motorized elevator machine moves a rope or a belt, which typically supports the weight of the cab so that it moves through a hoistway.
The elevator machine includes a machine shaft rotationally driven by the machine motor. A sheave is supported on the machine shaft and rotates with the machine shaft. The ropes or belts are typically tracked through the sheave such that the machine motor may rotate the sheave in one direction to lower the cab and rotate the sheave in the opposite direction to raise the cab. The elevator machine typically includes a solenoid-actuated brake that engages a disk or flange that rotates with the machine shaft to hold the machine shaft and sheave when the cab is at a selected landing.
Operationally, the solenoid-actuated brake may be switched on or off to respectively engage or disengage the disk or flange associated with the machine shaft. Switching the solenoid-actuated brake on and off often produces undesirable noise as the brake contacts the disk or flange to apply a braking force. Additionally, solenoid-actuated brakes may be considerably bulky and expensive, may produce excessive heat, and may require additional auxiliary parts to achieve a desired level of operation. One example auxiliary part is a proximity sensor to determine a position of the brake. Such parts add to the expense and maintenance of known solenoid-actuated brakes.
There is a need for a quieter, simplified and compact elevator machine brake. This invention addresses those needs and provides enhanced capabilities while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of the prior art.
An exemplary braking device useful in an elevator system selectively varies the braking force applied to a rotating portion of the elevator machine by controlling an influence on a shape-changing material of a brake actuator that controls engagement between a brake member and the rotating portion.
One example elevator machine includes a motor that rotationally drives a machine shaft. An elevator machine brake applies a braking force to a disk, which is coupled to the machine shaft, to control movement of an elevator car as it slows or stops rotation of the machine shaft. One example elevator machine brake includes a bias member that applies a bias force to cause engagement between a braking member and the disk. The brake actuator operates against the bias force to allow selective movement of the disk and shaft.
In one example, the brake actuator moves between a plurality of different braking positions. A controller determines the plurality of different braking positions and controls an input to the brake actuator.
In another example, the position of the brake actuator is determined based upon at least one of the influence on the brake actuator or an electric output from the brake actuator. The controller uses the electric input, a detected piezoelectric stack voltage or both, for example, to determine the position of the brake actuator and thus the position of a braking member relative to the rotating portion.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiments. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
A controller 26 operates the motor 12 and the elevator machine brake 20. The controller 26 may be integrated with the elevator machine 10 or may be located remotely from the elevator machine 10. In one example, the controller 26 selectively controls power to the motor 12 and selectively varies the braking force that the elevator machine brake 20 applies to the disk 22.
The linkage 42 is operatively associated with a brake actuator 48 that is at least partially supported by an actuator housing 50. The actuator housing 50 is mounted on a rigid portion of the brake or machine assembly 52.
The bias member 38 applies a bias force to the linkage 42 that urges the caliper brake pad 44 towards the second braking surface 46 and the disk 22 toward the brake pad 34 to provide a braking force on both sides of the disk 22. A fully applied braking position is illustrated in
In one example, an applied influence such as an electric field, electric current, a voltage or a magnetic field, for example, controls the brake actuator 48 to move the linkage 42 against the bias force to reduce or eliminate the braking force on the disk 22, as illustrated in
The illustrated brake actuator 48 comprises a known shape-changing material that changes shape in response to the selected influence. The shape change is not necessarily a change in geometrical shape. Rather, the crystal or molecular structure of the material changes shape responsive to the applied influence in a known manner. Such a shape change often results in an elongation or contraction of the material within the actuator 48.
In one example, the material of the brake actuator 48 changes shape by expanding in response to the applied influence to move the linkage 42 against the bias force to reduce or eliminate the braking force on the disk 22. When the influence is removed, the material contracts and the bias force applies the braking force to the disk 22.
In another example, the material expands to apply the braking force.
In one example, the shape-changing material of the brake actuator 48 includes a known piezoelectric material. As known, piezoelectric material changes shape in response to an electrical input, such as an electric current or a voltage. The change in the shape is proportional to the magnitude of the electrical input and the change may be positive or negative (i.e., expanding in a nominal direction or contracting in the nominal direction) depending on the polarity of the electrical input, for example.
In another example, the shape-changing material of the brake actuator 48 includes a known magnetostrictive material. As known, magnetostrictive material changes shape in response to a magnetic field. The change in shape typically is proportional to the magnitude of the magnetic field. The shape change may be positive or negative (i.e., expanding in a nominal direction or contracting in the nominal direction) depending on the orientation of the magnetic field, for example.
Other examples include an electrorestrictive material that changes responsive to an electrical influence in a controllable or periodic manner. A variety of such materials are known.
One feature of the example brake actuator 48 that is advantageous is the relatively small size of the brake actuator 48 compared to solenoid actuators. The small size of the brake actuator 48 reduces the amount of design space required in the elevator brake 20, consumes less energy, and provides a longer usage life. Moreover, the light weight of the brake actuator 48 reduces the overall weight of the elevator brake 20 compared to previously known elevator brakes.
An actuator having a shape-changing material has advantages compared to solenoid actuators used in known elevator machine brakes. For example, the actuator 48 having a shape-changing material is selectively and precisely controllable to precisely control the magnitude of a braking force. This allows for avoiding the noises associated with known arrangements where the brake pads were either fully applied or fully released with no gradual control of movement between those positions. It is known that the amount of influence (i.e., electrical current) provided to the shape-changing material, for example a piezoelectric stack, changes the size of the stack (i.e., causes expansion or contraction). In the example of
In one example, the brake actuator 48 moves the linkage 42 between a plurality of different braking positions. The plurality of different braking positions result from different influences on the brake actuator 48. In one example, the controller 26 determines a required initial braking force in a braking application and activates the brake actuator 48 with a corresponding influence on the brake actuator 48 to generate the required braking force on the disk 22. If the initial braking force is not adequate to slow or stop the rotating machine shaft 14 as the car approaches its destination, the controller determines a second, greater braking force and changes the influence to generate the greater braking force. Such gradual brake application reduces noise and enhances passenger comfort and ride quality such gradual brake application was not possible with previous, known actuators.
In another example, the controller 26 selectively varies the braking force to gradually increase or decrease the braking force applied to the disk 22. Selectively varying the braking force may advantageously reduce noise in the elevator machine brake 20 and allow smoother movement of an elevator cab.
Compared to prior art elevator machine brakes, utilizing the example brake actuator 48 may allow reducing a gap 54 between the brake pads 36, 46 and the braking surfaces on the disk 22, thereby further reducing any “clamping” noise that otherwise occurs upon engagement between the brake pads 34, 44 and the disk 22.
In other examples, the controller 26 selectively varies the braking force in response to an emergency situation. Emergency situations may occur when an elevator cab is in free fall, for example. A selected influence on the brake actuator 48 moves the linkage 42 in the direction of the bias force to supplement the bias force and provides a gradually applied additional emergency braking force on the disk 22 in a free fall situation. This type of control enhances passenger comfort as known emergency stopping devices are not capable of gradual brake force application but the illustrated actuators 48 are.
Positively or negatively energizing the brake actuator 48 may also be utilized to move the linkage 42 in a manner to release it from a stuck, engaged or disengaged position, for example. For example, a positive voltage may be used during brake applications. If the brake is stuck in an applied position, a negative voltage can be applied to cause a reverse response by the shape-changing material to release the brake components. Using the actuators 48 in this manner can reduce a need for manual maintenance procedures.
Another feature of the disclosed examples is that the actuators 48 provide position information regarding the brake components. This eliminates the need for additional position sensors.
The condition of the brake actuator 48, and thus the position of the linkage 42 and the brake pads relative to the disk 22, is determined in one example based upon at least one of the selected influence on the brake actuator 48 or a measurable output from the brake actuator 48. In one example, the brake actuator 48 includes a piezoelectric material and the controller 26 uses the electric influence or an electric output such as a voltage level from the piezoelectric material to determine the position of the linkage 42 relative to the disk 22. That is, predetermined input or output values correspond to predetermined piezoelectric material conditions and corresponding brake positions such that for a given input or output, the brake actuator 48 position can be determined. Given this description, those skilled in the art will realize how to use such information to make position determinations for their particular brake arrangement.
In other examples, the controller 26 uses a piezoelectric actuator voltage output to monitor and correct for brake pad wear. The piezoelectric actuator voltage outputs correspond to predetermined positions for applying a braking force such that the controller 26 detects brake pad wear when the actual position for a given input is different than an expected position (as determined from the output voltage). In one example, when the controller 26 detects a different than expected actual position (i.e., brake pad wear), the controller 26 automatically adjusts control parameters to provide desired braking, provides a service indication regarding the detected brake pad wear, or both.
In other examples, the controller 26 uses the position information to detect whether the shape-changing material of the brake actuator 48 is effective for applying a braking force and to ensure that the motor 12 is not driving through the applied braking force.
One feature of the example elevator brake 20 without the bias member 38 that may provide an advantage is the added size advantage. Without the bias member 38, the rigid caliper arm 40 is reduced in size (i.e., the rigid caliper arm 40 is moved closer to the disk 22). The compact size of the piezoelectric brake actuator 48 may reduce the amount of design space required in the elevator brake 20. Additionally, the lighter weight without the bias member 38 and associated structural support components may reduce the overall weight and cost of the elevator brake 20 compared to previously known elevator brakes.
Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US05/06264 | 2/25/2005 | WO | 00 | 4/11/2011 |