Elevator systems typically include a car that moves along guiderails within a hoistway between different levels in a building. A variety of machine configurations are used to move the car as desired. Various braking arrangements are used to maintain the elevator car at a desired landing.
Another feature typical of elevator systems is a safety braking arrangement. A governor device typically detects an overspeed condition and activates a safety braking device that is mounted on an elevator car or counterweight, for example. A safety braking device typically applies a braking force to the guiderail to decelerate the car or counterweight and bring it to a stop. One example arrangement is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,538,706. As shown in that document, a brake pad is forced against a surface of the guiderail during a brake application.
One attempt at avoiding applying a braking force to the guiderail surface is shown in the published application WO 2004/033354. In that document, brake pads apply a braking force to the sides of rollers that are disposed on opposite sides of the guiderail.
An exemplary elevator braking device comprises a brake housing. At least one roller is supported by the brake housing. The roller is arranged to be selectively moveable between a first position in which the roller does not engage a guide rail and a second position in which the roller can engage and roll along the guide rail. At least one biasing member is supported by the brake housing. The biasing member biases the roller toward the guide rail. At least one braking surface is supported by the brake housing. The braking surface engages a periphery of the roller that faces the side of the guiderail. Friction between the periphery of the associated roller and the braking surface provides a stopping force.
An exemplary method of decelerating a vertically moving mass in an elevator system includes providing at least one braking device on the vertically moving mass. The braking device has at least one roller that engages a surface of the guiderail. The roller is biased toward the guiderail. The roller is permitted to roll along the guiderail without sliding along it. A braking force is applied to a periphery of the roller that faces the guiderail using at least one braking surface that engages the periphery of the roller.
The various features and advantages of the disclosed examples will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The example of
The example of
In one example, the biasing members 36 each have a contour corresponding to shape of the periphery of the rollers 32 so that the biasing members 36 do not engage the portion 40 but does engage the portion 42. This allows for applying braking force by the biasing members 36, for example.
As can be appreciated from
Another example includes having the roller 132 has a corresponding braking surface internal to the braking device. The roller 132 is this example remains in a single vertical position relative to the base and engages the guiderail when the braking device 26 (and the elevator car) shifts laterally responsive to the roller 32 engaging the guide rail.
One feature of the illustrated examples is that they provide a progressive safety device. The resilience of the biasing members 36 (e.g., leaf springs or another resilient member) and the presence of the rollers 32 on opposite sides of the guiderail 24 allows for progressively applying a braking force as the rollers 32 are urged further toward the second position.
The illustrated examples avoid the drawbacks associated with attempting to apply a braking force to a guiderail surface. A variety of actuating arrangements including known governor configurations are useful for moving the rollers 32 between the first and second positions for a brake application using the example elevator braking device arrangements.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the scope of legal protection given to this invention, which can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/069392 | 12/23/2009 | WO | 00 | 5/11/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/078862 | 6/30/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3509970 | Gabler | May 1970 | A |
4176826 | Gray et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4538706 | Koppensteiner | Sep 1985 | A |
5002158 | Ericson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5964322 | Thompson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6109398 | Lempio et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6318507 | Jin | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6997287 | Sasaki | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7398863 | Liebetrau et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8186483 | Sirigu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20020125079 | Mattlar et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20080296098 | Sato et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
S4991055 | Aug 1974 | JP |
59-5021 | Feb 1984 | JP |
200401386 | Nov 2005 | KR |
2004033354 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Search for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980163162.4 dated Dec. 11, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2009/069392 dated Aug. 25, 2010 |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2009/069392 dated Jul. 5, 2012. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 09852683.3, dated Oct. 12, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120222918 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |