This invention generally relates to elevator systems. More particularly, this invention relates to roping arrangements for supporting an elevator car.
Elevator systems often use a traction drive arrangement for moving a car and counterweight within a hoistway. Load bearing members such as steel ropes or flat belts typically support the weight of the counterweight and the elevator car. A drive machine controls movement of at least one traction sheave, which moves the load bearing members and the car and counterweight in a known manner.
A variety of roping strategies for supporting cars and counterweights within a hoistway are known. With different elevator system configurations, different challenges are presented for achieving an effective roping configuration while accommodating the other components that typically are needed within a hoistway. In many instances, it is possible to use a 1:1 roping ratio and support opposite ends of the load bearing members on the top of the counterweight and car, respectively. Other configurations, present more design challenges.
Some system configurations are not suitable for a 1:1 roping arrangement. One example is a system having more than one elevator car within a single hoistway. Different roping and component arrangements are needed to accommodate more than one elevator car in a hoistway.
For some such situations it is desirable to have a 2:1 roping ratio. Underslung car roping arrangements have been proposed for such situations. One difficulty with known arrangements is that they introduce complexities for trying to accommodate other components within the hoistway. For example, the sides of an elevator car typically must accommodate guide rollers that follow the guide rails within the hoistway. Elevator governor ropes and governor components typically extend along the sides of the car within the hoistway. Positioning tapes and traveling cables for supplying power or communication signals typically also must be accommodated along the sides of an elevator car. Therefore, it is not usually possible to route load bearing members about the sides of an elevator car.
At the same time, however, arranging load beating members along the front of an elevator car typically interferes with door operation, or requires an unusual drive machine configuration. A typical elevator drive machine has a drive sheave that accommodates the load bearing members when they are relatively very close together. Such spacing between the load bearing members does not make it possible to maintain car balance and route the load bearing members about the front of an elevator car without potentially interfering with the operation of the door components or the clearance at the hoistway opening at a landing.
It is desirable to have the ability to incorporate a 2:1 roping ratio that does not require significant alteration of other elevator system components. This invention addresses that need.
An exemplary disclosed elevator car assembly includes an elevator car. A plurality of sheaves are supported for rotational movement relative to the car and for vertical movement with the car as the car moves within a hoistway, for example. At least a first one and a second one of the sheaves are positioned near one edge of the frame. At least a third one and a fourth one of the sheaves are positioned near an oppositely facing edge of the frame. The first sheave is laterally spaced a first distance from the second sheave. The third sheave is laterally spaced a second, greater distance from the fourth sheave.
In one example, the first and second sheaves rotate about axes that are aligned at an oblique angle relative to the one edge of the frame. In one example, the first sheave axis is traverse to the second sheave axis.
An exemplary disclosed elevator assembly includes an elevator car and a plurality of load bearing members that at least partially support the car. A plurality of sheaves are supported for vertical movement with the car. The sheaves guide the load bearing members under the car. The load bearing members are a first distance apart near a first side of the car and a second, further distance apart near a second, oppositely facing side of the car.
In one example, the load bearing members near the second side of the car extend along oppositely facing lateral sides of the car.
One example includes at least one door supported for lateral movement along the second side of the car within an operating range. The load bearing members along the second side of the car are outside of the operating range. The load bearing members along the first side of the car are close enough together to accommodate being driven by a conventional traction sheave without requiring modification to a drive machine.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
A plurality of load bearing members 32, 34, 36 and 38 at least partially support the car 22 and facilitate movement of the car in a known manner within a hoistway. The load bearing members 32-38 in one example comprise flat belts having at least one elongated tension member coated with a polymer jacket. In another example, the load bearing members comprise steel ropes. The disclosed example embodiments are useful with a variety of load bearing members.
In the illustrated example of
The load bearing members 32 and 34 are directed around a first sheave 40 while the load bearing members 36 and 38 are directed around a second sheave 42. The first sheave 40 and the second sheave 42 are positioned relatively close together and spaced apart by a first distance.
As can be appreciated from
One advantage to the disclosed example is that the load bearing members 32-38 can be kept spaced apart a distance that corresponds to a conventional traction sheave design. A machine supported near the top of a hoistway having a traction sheave that drives the load bearing members with the load bearing members relatively close together can be used while still achieving a 2:1 roping ratio and having the load bearing members extend along either the lateral sides 28 or the front side 24. Having the load bearing members spaced apart a second distance controlled by the spacing between the third sheave 43 and the fourth sheave 44 near the front side 24 of the car 22 allows for a much greater spacing between the load bearing members 32, 34 and 36, 38. Such greater spacing allows for the load bearing members to extend along the front side 24 of the elevator car 22 (in the example of
Additionally, the disclosed example allows for arranging load bearing members in a 2:1 roping ratio with an underslung car that leaves at least most of the lateral sides 28 of the car unobstructed by the load bearing members to accommodate other necessary components within an elevator hoistway.
One example support frame 60 for such an underslung arrangement is shown in
In one example, each primary support member 62 and the corresponding sheave supports 66 comprise a mounting bracket that may be positioned at a variety of angles relative to the plank beam 64. In such an example, each mounting bracket is separately positionable to provide a customizable arrangement of the path followed by the load bearing members underneath the elevator car.
Similarly, a third sheave axis 83 and a fourth sheave axis 84 are transverse to each other and aligned at an oblique angle relative to an oppositely facing edge 85 on the car 22.
As can be appreciated from
As the support frame 60 is secured to the car frame, the sheaves 40-44 are supported for vertical movement with the car within a hoistway, for example.
The disclosed example provides an efficient way of providing a 2:1 roping arrangement with an underslung car in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Keeping the load bearing members closer together behind the car 22 and farther apart from each other in front of the car 22 allows for accommodating conventional elevator system components while still achieving the desired roping ratio and overall elevator system configuration.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/006261 | 2/25/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/15/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/093485 | 9/8/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
304823 | Hutchinson | Sep 1884 | A |
0849840 | Foster | Apr 1907 | A |
849840 | Foster | Apr 1907 | A |
0974439 | Schwab | Nov 1910 | A |
1027628 | Schwab | May 1912 | A |
1805227 | Rugg | May 1931 | A |
1896776 | James | Feb 1933 | A |
1896777 | James | Feb 1933 | A |
5663538 | Sakita | Sep 1997 | A |
5699879 | Sakita | Dec 1997 | A |
5865274 | Kiji et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877462 | Chenais | Mar 1999 | A |
5957243 | Root et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6126023 | Durrant-Whyte et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6273217 | Hikita | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6360849 | Hikita | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364065 | Hikita | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6554107 | Yumura et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6860367 | Ericson | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7032716 | Meyle et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7117979 | Angst et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156209 | Koeppe, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178635 | Meissner et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7296661 | Petricio Yaksic | Nov 2007 | B1 |
20050082121 | Deplazes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087402 | Haegi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050279584 | Reuter et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060016641 | Koeppe | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060163009 | Ishii et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060289240 | Sakita | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070039785 | Smith et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1371596 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1698580 | Sep 2006 | EP |
4345486 | Dec 1992 | JP |
4361960 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5051185 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5132257 | May 1993 | JP |
6305648 | Nov 1994 | JP |
8133611 | May 1995 | JP |
7157243 | Jun 1995 | JP |
7172716 | Jul 1995 | JP |
8133630 | May 1996 | JP |
9110316 | Apr 1997 | JP |
200344437 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001226050 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001240318 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001247265 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001251188 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001335244 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002220164 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002255460 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003160283 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004155519 | Jun 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080164103 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |