Elevator systems are in widespread use for carrying passengers between various levels in buildings, for example. Access to an elevator car requires that elevator car doors open when the car is at a landing at which a passenger desires to board the elevator car, for example. Each landing includes hoistway doors that move with the elevator car doors between open and closed positions.
There are various known arrangements for coupling the elevator car doors to the hoistway doors so that the door mover that causes movement of the car doors also causes desired movement of the hoistway doors. Most door coupling arrangements include a set of vanes supported on the elevator car door structure and an interlock including rollers supported on the hoistway door structure. When the rollers are received adjacent the vanes, it is possible to move both doors together. The movement of the car doors includes one of the vanes pushing on one of the rollers to move the hoistway door in one direction and the other vane pushing on the other roller to move the hoistway door in the other direction.
It is believed that elevator door system components account for approximately 50% of elevator maintenance requests and 30% of callbacks. Almost half of the callbacks due to a door system malfunction are related to one of the interlock functions.
Another drawback associated with known interlock arrangements is that the components require space between the elevator car and the hoistway wall and that leads to an increase in a gap between the sills of the elevator car and the hoistway enclosure. This gap must be within a certain limit to meet code requirements in some locations. Proposals for reducing the gap have included adding components to the landing sill. Adding components for this purpose, however, increases cost and introduces additional potential sources of callbacks.
An illustrative example elevator door interlock includes a base, a plurality of interlock bumpers supported on the base, and a latch supported on the base for movement relative to the base between a door locking position and a released position. The plurality of interlock bumpers are supported on the base with a gap between the plurality of interlock bumpers. Each of the interlock bumpers includes a contact surface configured to contact at least one vane supported on an elevator car door. Each of the interlock bumpers remains rotationally fixed relative to the base. The latch includes a latch bumper that is situated relative to the gap such that the at least one vane contacts the latch bumper and urges the latch into the released position when at least one vane is at least partially in the gap.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of the previous paragraph, a first distance separates the latch bumper from a first one of the interlock bumpers when the latch is in the locking position, a second distance separates the latch bumper from the first one of the interlock bumpers when the latch is in the released position, the first distance is smaller than the second distance and the second distance is at least as large as the gap.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs, the latch is situated relative to the gap when the latch is in the released position so that the latch does not carry any load associated with movement of an associated hoistway door.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs, the latch comprises a flat plate, the latch includes a locking surface configured to engage a stop when the latch is in the locking position, and the latch comprises a weight near one end to bias the latch into the locking position.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs, the base comprises a door hanger for a hoistway door.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs includes a switch that provides an indication whether the latch is in the locking position and the latch comprises a switch contact that cooperates with the switch when the latch is in the locking position and separated from the switch when the latch is in the released position.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs includes at least one bumper support secured to the base. The base comprises a flat surface, the at least one bumper support includes a plurality of surfaces that are perpendicular to the flat surface, the plurality of surfaces of the at least one bumper support respectively support one of the plurality of interlock bumpers, and a position of the bumpers relative to the respective bumper support surface is selectively adjustable.
Another illustrative example elevator door interlock includes a base, a plurality of interlock bumpers supported on the base with a gap between the plurality of interlock bumpers, and a latch supported on the base for movement relative to the base between a door locking position and a released position. Each of the interlock bumpers includes a contact surface configured to contact at least one vane supported on an elevator car door. The latch includes a latch bumper that is situated relative to the gap such that the at least one vane contacts the latch bumper and urges the latch into the released position when the at least one vane is at least partially in the gap. The latch bumper is situated relative to the gap when the latch is in the released position so that the latch does not carry any load associated with movement of an associated hoistway door.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs, a first distance separates the latch bumper from a first one of the interlock bumpers when the latch is in the locking position, a second distance separates the latch bumper from the first one of the interlock bumpers when the latch is in the released position, the first distance is smaller than the second distance, and the second distance is at least as large as the gap.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs, each of the interlock bumpers remains rotationally fixed relative to the base.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs, the latch comprises a flat plate, the latch includes a locking surface configured to engage a stop when the latch is in the locking position, and the latch comprises a weight near one end to bias the latch into the locking position.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs, the base comprises a door hanger for a hoistway door.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs includes a switch that provides an indication whether the latch is in the locking position and wherein the latch comprises a switch contact that cooperates with the switch when the latch is in the locking position and the switch contact is separated from the switch when the latch is in the released position.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door interlock of any of the previous paragraphs includes at least one bumper support secured to the base. The base comprises a flat surface, the at least one bumper support includes a plurality of surfaces that are perpendicular to the flat surface, the plurality of surfaces of the at least one bumper support respectively support one of the plurality of interlock bumpers, and a position of the bumpers relative to the respective bumper support surface is selectively adjustable.
An illustrative example elevator door assembly includes at least one elevator car door, at least one vane situated for movement with the elevator car door, at least one hoistway door, a base supported for movement with the hoistway door, a plurality of interlock bumpers supported on the base with a gap between the plurality of interlock bumpers, and a latch supported on the base for movement relative to the base between a door locking position and a released position. Each of the interlock bumpers includes a contact surface configured to contact the vane when the elevator car door is adjacent the hoistway door. The interlock bumpers remain rotationally fixed relative to the base. The latch includes a latch bumper that is situated relative to the gap such that the vane contacts the latch bumper and urges the latch into the released position as the elevator car door approaches the hoistway door. The latch does not carry any load associated with lateral movement of the hoistway door caused by engagement between the vane and any of the plurality of interlock bumpers.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door assembly of any of the previous paragraphs, a first distance separates the latch bumper from a first one of the interlock bumpers when the latch is in the locking position, a second distance separates the latch bumper from the first one of the interlock bumpers when the latch is in the released position, the first distance is smaller than the second distance, and the second distance is at least as large as the gap.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door assembly of any of the previous paragraphs, the latch comprises a flat surface, the latch includes a locking surface configured to engage a stop when the latch is in the locking position, and the latch comprises a weight near one end to bias the latch into the locking position.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door assembly of any of the previous paragraphs, the base comprises a door hanger of the hoistway door.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door assembly of any of the previous paragraphs includes a switch that provides an indication whether the latch is in the locking position and wherein the latch comprises a switch contact that cooperates with the switch when the latch is in the locking position and the switch contact is separated from the switch when the latch is in the released position.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the elevator door assembly of any of the previous paragraphs includes at least one bumper support secured to the base, the base comprises a flat surface, the at least one bumper support includes a plurality of surfaces that are perpendicular to the flat surface, the plurality of surfaces of the at least one bumper support respectively support one of the plurality of interlock bumpers, and a position of the bumpers relative to the respective bumper support surface is selectively adjustable.
The various features and advantages of an example embodiment will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
Embodiments of this invention provide an elevator door interlock that requires less space compared to previous interlock designs. By reducing the amount of space required by the interlock, it becomes possible to reduce the amount of space needed between the elevator car and the hoistway wall. Additionally, the gap between the elevator car door sill and the landing door panel can be reduced compared to other interlock configurations.
Embodiments of this invention separate the door unlocking and door moving functions. In previous interlocks, a roller used to unlock the door lock also carried a significant portion of the load associated with opening the hoistway door. By separating the unlocking and door moving functions, the latch of the interlock does not need to bear the load associated with opening the hoistway door, which can contribute to realizing a thinner interlock.
Additionally, embodiments of this invention reduce costs associated with the interlock assembly and field installation. Maintenance costs are lower because example embodiments reduce the likelihood for costs associated with callbacks based on interlock problems or malfunction.
One difference between the example interlock 30 and previous interlock arrangements is that the bumpers 40 and 42 remain rotationally fixed relative to the base 32. Previous interlock arrangements typically included rollers that rotated relative to the hoistway door or associated components of the interlock. By eliminating rollers, the example embodiment reduces the potential for noise associated with interlock operation. By remaining rotationally fixed relative to the base 32 during engagement with the vanes 28 and while the doors 24 and 26 open or close, the bumpers 40 and 42 provide a simpler, less expensive and more reliable arrangement than previous interlock designs. Depending on the material selected for the bumpers 40 and 42, there may be some deflection of the material, which may be considered relative movement between the bumpers 40 and 42 (or at least their contact surfaces) and the base 32, however, such movement is not the same as rotational movement associated with a roller.
The interlock 30 includes a latch 50 supported by the base 32 so that the latch 50 is moveable between a locking position (shown in
The latch 50 includes a latch bumper 54 that is configured to be contacted by a vane 28 as the elevator car doors 24 approach the hoistway doors 26. When the latch 50 is in the locking position as shown in
By separating the locking and moving functions and eliminating the requirement that the latch 50 carry any load associated with moving the hoistway door 26, the latch 50 can be thinner. In the illustrated example, the latch 50 comprises a single flat plate. A thinner latch 50 contributes to reducing the space needed to accommodate the interlock 30 in a hoistway. Another feature of separating the locking and moving functions is that the bearing and latch connection can be simplified and less expensive compared to previous latch configurations, which saves cost and reduces the complexity of the interlock.
In the illustrated example a locking surface 56 on the latch 50 engages a stop 58 that is secured in a fixed positon at a landing when the latch 50 is in the locking position so that the hoistway doors 26 cannot open when the latch 50 is in the locking position. In the released position shown in
The illustrated example includes a switch contact 62 near one end of the latch 50. The switch contact 62 cooperates with a switch 64 that provides an indication when the latch 50 is in the locking position, which corresponds to the hoistway door 26 being locked. In the released position, the switch contact 62 does not make any contact with any portion of the switch 64, which provides an indication that the door is unlocked.
Using flat plates for the latch 50 and the base 32, for example, allows for making a thinner interlock that requires less space and allows for the elevator door 24 to be closer to the hoistway door 26 and the hoistway wall because less clearance is required between them to accommodate components of the interlock.
By contrast, a conventional interlock shown in
In this embodiment the door lock includes a stop 58′ and the latch includes a locking surface 56′ that engages the stop 58′ in the locking position shown in
The interlock bumpers 40 and 42 are adjustable relative to the bumper support 34 to adjust a lateral position of the interlock bumpers 40 and 42 relative to the hoistway door 26. In this example the interlock bumpers 40 and 42 are supported on threaded rods that are received in threaded openings in the bumper support 34. Rotating the bumpers 40, 42 and their respective rods allows for changing the position of each bumper independently. The bumper positions should be set to accommodate the vanes 28 by setting the gap between the bumpers 40 and 42 and aligning the bumpers with the position of the vanes 28. The adjustable positions of the interlock bumpers 40 and 42 relative to the door hanger makes it easier for a technician to achieve alignment between the vanes 28 on the elevator car doors and all interlocks 30′ along the hoistway without requiring any relative adjustments between the latch 50 and the switch 64.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/967,771, filed on May 1, 2018.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1950150 | Norton | Mar 1934 | A |
3315767 | Walter | Apr 1967 | A |
3638762 | Johns | Feb 1972 | A |
4094385 | Maeda | Jun 1978 | A |
4457405 | Johns | Jul 1984 | A |
4923055 | Holland | May 1990 | A |
5474448 | Andreiko | Dec 1995 | A |
5538106 | McHugh | Jul 1996 | A |
5651427 | Kulak | Jul 1997 | A |
5651428 | Ahigian | Jul 1997 | A |
5718055 | Pierce | Feb 1998 | A |
5732796 | Ahigian | Mar 1998 | A |
5959266 | Uchiumi | Sep 1999 | A |
6089355 | Seki | Jul 2000 | A |
6173813 | Rebillard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6446759 | Kulak | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6474448 | Zappa | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7147084 | Jahkonen | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7252179 | Oberleitner | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7350623 | Kinoshita | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398862 | Dziwak | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7650971 | Pillin | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8939262 | Schienda | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9260275 | Reuter | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9302886 | Tantis | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9637350 | Mittermayr | May 2017 | B2 |
9656835 | Kitazawa | May 2017 | B2 |
9663329 | Zappa | May 2017 | B2 |
9834413 | Mittermayr | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9845224 | Rasanen | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10196237 | Kattainen | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10322910 | Dharmaraj | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20010003319 | Itoh | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20120000729 | Marvin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120000732 | Draper | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20160145074 | Kattainen | May 2016 | A1 |
20170190547 | Dharmaraj | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180079621 | Fauconnet | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180118514 | Bruno | May 2018 | A1 |
20180229972 | Kulak | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180265334 | Kulak | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190337765 | Wang | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190337767 | Tracey | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190337768 | Kulak | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190337769 | Khzouz | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200115192 | Montigny | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201610675 | Oct 2010 | CN |
204057608 | Dec 2014 | CN |
204369335 | Jun 2015 | CN |
103693538 | Jul 2015 | CN |
104773637 | Jul 2015 | CN |
103693539 | Nov 2015 | CN |
103803389 | Nov 2015 | CN |
104176604 | Mar 2016 | CN |
104444734 | Mar 2016 | CN |
105645239 | Jun 2016 | CN |
105936467 | Sep 2016 | CN |
106006324 | Oct 2016 | CN |
106044504 | Oct 2016 | CN |
106081819 | Nov 2016 | CN |
106081820 | Nov 2016 | CN |
106395582 | Feb 2017 | CN |
107176530 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107614412 | Jan 2018 | CN |
2426076 | Mar 2012 | EP |
3048075 | Mar 2018 | EP |
415931 | Sep 1934 | GB |
2358623 | Aug 2001 | GB |
H0812228 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H10203742 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2005008371 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2005077808 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006080094 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2011104818 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011137545 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2014122358 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2016085678 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016176033 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017023927 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017187560 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 19 17 2026 dated Sep. 5, 2019. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 19 17 2040 dated Sep. 23, 2019. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19172106.7, dated Jan. 31, 2020. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 19 17 2105 dated Sep. 27, 2019. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 19 17 2084 dated Mar. 18, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220024725 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15967771 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 17480664 | US |