Elevator systems include a variety of devices for providing control over movement of the elevator car. Elevator governors for protecting against over speed conditions are well known. Most elevator governors include a tripping mechanism located near the top of the hoistway. A governor rope extends along the length of the hoistway wrapping around a governor sheave associated with the tripping mechanism and an idler sheave associated with a tension weight near an opposite end of the hoistway. The elevator car is connected with the rope so that the rope moves as the elevator car moves. If the elevator car moves at a speed that is higher than desired, the speed of rotation of the governor sheave activates the tripping mechanism.
Governors in elevators systems are used for two purposes. One use of an elevator governor is for activating or dropping the machine brake and interrupting power to the machine motor in the event of an over speed condition. The other use is for activating elevator safeties that engage the guide rails, for example, in the event of a further over speed condition. Given that the governor reaction to each over speed condition is not independent, it is difficult to achieve specific control over the speed at which the governor performs both functions. Additionally, relying upon a single governor tripping mechanism for both functions introduces additional challenges when satisfying some codes for low speed elevators.
An exemplary elevator system includes an elevator car. A first governor sheave is supported on the elevator car for movement with the elevator car. The first governor sheave is supported for rotational movement relative to the elevator car responsive to movement of the elevator car. A first governor tripping mechanism is supported on the first governor sheave. The first governor tripping mechanism provides an indication to perform a first governor function for controlling the speed of the elevator car responsive to the elevator car moving at a speed above a first threshold speed. A second governor sheave is supported on the elevator car for movement with the elevator car and for rotational movement relative to the elevator car responsive to movement of the elevator car. A second governor tripping mechanism is supported on the second governor sheave. The second governor tripping mechanism provides an indication to perform a second, different governor function for controlling movement of the elevator car responsive to the elevator car moving at a speed above a second threshold speed.
An exemplary method for controlling movement of an elevator car includes providing an indication from a first governor tripping mechanism to perform a first governor function for controlling a speed of the elevator car responsive to the elevator car moving at a speed above a first threshold speed. The first governor tripping mechanism is supported on a first governor sheave that is supported on the elevator car. A second tripping mechanism is supported on a second governor sheave that is also supported on the elevator car. An indication from the second governor tripping mechanism is provided to perform a second, different governor function for controlling movement of the elevator car responsive to the elevator car moving at a speed above a second threshold speed.
The separate governor tripping mechanisms each supported on its own governor sheave provides specific control over the tripping mechanism reaction at a desired, corresponding threshold speed. The separate tripping mechanisms on their own governor sheaves also provides more flexibility and a more reliable arrangement compared to using a single tripping mechanism to perform both functions.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
A governor assembly 30 is provided for protecting against over speed conditions in which the elevator car 22 moves at a speed that is higher than a desired speed. The governor assembly 30 includes a first governor sheave 32 supported on the elevator car 22 for movement with the elevator car 22 as it moves along the guide rails 24. The first governor sheave 32 rotates relative to the elevator car 22 as the car 22 moves along the guide rails 24. A second governor sheave 34 is also supported on the elevator car 22 and is rotatable relative to the elevator car 22. A governor rope 36 has ends that remain near ends of the hoistway, for example, in which the elevator car 22 is situated. In one example, an upper end is fixed and a lower end is attached to a hanging mass to maintain a desired tension on the governor rope 36. The hanging mass is situated to allow for limited, guided vertical movement in some examples. The governor rope 36 at least partially wraps around each of the governor sheaves 32 and 34 so that each sheave rotates as the elevator car 22 moves relative to the governor rope 36.
In this example, the biasing member 44 comprises a magnet that cooperates with a magnetic portion 46 for maintaining the centrifugal elements 42 in a first inactivated position (illustrated in
Although the illustrated examples include magnetic biasing members, other embodiments include different biasing members such as springs.
The second governor sheave 34 supports a second governor tripping mechanism 50 that includes centrifugal elements 52. A biasing member 54, which is a magnet in this example, biases the centrifugal elements 52 into a retracted position (shown in
In an illustrative example, the biasing member 54 comprises a magnet that cooperates with a magnetic portion 56 for maintaining the centrifugal elements 52 in a first position relative to the second governor sheave 34 at speeds below the second threshold speed.
The illustrated governor assembly 30 includes separate governor sheaves 32 and 34 and separate governor tripping mechanisms 40 and 50 to provide separate, independent control over the two distinct governor functions. This independent control over each function increases the accuracy with which each function is performed. The independent mechanisms also provide greater flexibility for addressing a variety of situations.
For example, it is possible to independently control the first threshold speed at which the machine brake is dropped (and power to the machine motor is interrupted) and the second, higher threshold speed at which supplemental brakes such as the elevator safeties 60 are engaged. The first threshold speed and second threshold speed can be selected to meet the needs of a particular situation. The separate governor sheaves 32 and 34 and the corresponding separate tripping mechanisms provide precise control over the activation provided by each tripping mechanism to separately address the different over speed conditions associated with the two different threshold speeds. Such an arrangement is superior to a governor assembly that relies upon a single tripping mechanism to provide activation of the machine brake and a supplemental brake, for example, at different threshold speeds.
In one example, each tripping mechanism is dedicated to controlling elevator speed in a specific direction. The first governor sheave 32 and its first tripping mechanism 40 are used for controlling upward movement of the elevator car 22. The second tripping mechanism 50 in such an example is used for controlling a speed of downward movement of the elevator car 22. Having two independently activated tripping mechanisms provides the ability to select different threshold speeds for the respective directions.
The example of
The tripping mechanisms 40 and 50 can comprise the same components. The force exerted by the second biasing member 54 in some examples is greater than the force exerted by the first biasing member 44, so that the second tripping mechanism 50 provides an indication for activating the supplemental brake at a higher speed compared to that at which the first tripping mechanism 40 provides an indication to activate the machine brake 26 (and interrupt power to the motor). In one example, a stronger magnet is used for the biasing member 54 of the second tripping mechanism 50 compared to that biasing member 44 used for the first tripping mechanism 40. In another example, the centrifugal elements 52 of the second tripping mechanism 50 are configured differently than the centrifugal elements 42 of the first tripping mechanism 40. For example, different weights may be used to alter the speeds at which the tripping mechanisms provide their respective indications. Different weight allows for all centrifugal elements and magnets to be the same and have different tripping speeds. Those skilled in the art who have the benefit of this description will realize how to configure two tripping mechanisms to realize two separate threshold speeds at which each provides an indication for performing a corresponding governor function.
One feature of the illustrated example is that the governor sheaves 32 and 34 rotate about separate axes 45 and 55, respectively. That arrangement combined with the profile of the tripping mechanisms 40 and 50 allows for realizing a relatively narrow governor assembly 30 having a width w shown in
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/023890 | 2/7/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/5/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/108859 | 8/16/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1977452 | Neuschotz | Oct 1934 | A |
3695396 | Jones | Oct 1972 | A |
4083432 | Lusti | Apr 1978 | A |
4977982 | Bialy et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5052523 | Ericson | Oct 1991 | A |
5299661 | Pramanik | Apr 1994 | A |
5310022 | Sheridan et al. | May 1994 | A |
5407028 | Jamieson | Apr 1995 | A |
5487450 | Gerber | Jan 1996 | A |
5513723 | Luebke | May 1996 | A |
5797472 | Kamani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6170614 | Herkel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6360847 | Okada | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6454054 | Tanino et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6564907 | Sasaki | May 2003 | B1 |
6691834 | Sanchez et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6752246 | Takai et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6988593 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014014 | Mueller | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7475756 | Maury et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7537090 | Vantanen | May 2009 | B2 |
7575099 | Oh et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7607516 | Simon et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8069956 | Okada | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8342294 | Madoz Michaus et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20040134726 | Sanchez et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080245617 | Madoz Michaus et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090014256 | Matsuoka | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20120103732 | Kwon | May 2012 | A1 |
20130220739 | Okada | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140367206 | Della Porta | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150083528 | Kattainen | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150136544 | Dube | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2243739 | Oct 2010 | EP |
8002848 | Jan 1996 | JP |
2009154984 | Jul 2007 | JP |
03055780 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2006070436 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2008079106 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Search Report for Application No. 2011800669091 dated Jan. 26, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2011/023890 dated Aug. 22, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2011/023890 dated Nov. 18, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130306409 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |