This invention generally relates to static connector systems. More particularly, this invention relates to a device for securing an end of a load bearing arrangement.
Elevator systems typically include some form of load bearing member, such as roping or a belt for supporting and moving the cab through the hoistway as desired. In some configurations, the belt couples a counterweight to the cab. Regardless of the specific configuration of the elevator system, it typically is necessary to secure ends of the belt to an appropriate structure within the elevator system.
A variety of configurations of assemblies for securing the ends of a belt in an elevator system have been used. One example includes a cast socket and wedge arrangement where a portion of the belt is secured between the socket and the wedge. One disadvantage is that the casting process is relatively expensive and the integral nature of the casting arrangement limits access to the belt-engaging surfaces within the socket. This makes it difficult to treat the belt-engaging surfaces, such as by knurling the belt-engaging surfaces, to enhance the gripping characteristics. Additionally, it is difficult to achieve tolerances desirable for uniform load distribution.
Another example socket is formed from sheet metal and includes two sheet metal parts bent generally into a U-shape. The U-shaped parts are then joined with a dovetail joint and welded along the joint to form the socket. Shoe parts with knurled belt-engaging surfaces are inserted in the sheet metal parts. One drawback of this arrangement is a limited load carrying capacity. It is often difficult to bend sheet metal into the desired configuration if the sheet metal is over ¼ inch thick. Therefore, it is typically unfeasible to use thicker sheet metal to increase the load carrying capacity of the socket and larger and more cumbersome shoe parts are required.
Another shortcoming of current arrangements is that the arrangements do not provide the desired dimensional tolerances for many situations. One particular issue is presented by the need to establish and maintain a parallel alignment between opposite sides of the socket and opposite sides of the wedge. Without a truly parallel alignment, the forces on the load bearing member are not evenly distributed and belt life may be compromised.
There is a need for an improved elevator load bearing termination arrangement. This invention addresses that need and overcomes the shortcomings described above.
One example socket for securing an end of an elongated load bearing member in an elevator system includes at least one first socket member that at least partially forms the socket. Second socket members that are separate and distinct from each other and from the first socket member are spaced apart from each other for receiving a load-bearing member. Each second socket member is rigidly fixed to the at least one first socket member.
One example method of making a socket for use in an elevator system uses a first socket member and second socket members that are separate, distinct pieces. The method includes inserting a plurality of tabs that extend either the first socket member or the second socket members into a corresponding plurality of recesses in the other of the first socket member or the second socket members. This rigidly secures the first socket member and the second socket members together.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
In the illustrated example, a socket 24 includes side plates 26a and 26b (i.e., first socket members) and keeper parts 28a and 28b (i.e., second socket members) between the side plates 26a and 26b. The keeper parts 28a and 28b and the side plates 26a and 26b are distinct, separate pieces that are rigidly secured together and cooperate with a wedge 30 to secure the end of the load bearing member 22 in a desired position. The example device 10 has advantages in simplifying the manufacture and assembly of the socket 24 and allowing scaling of the design to a variety of load requirements. Additionally, the example device 10 facilitates flatness, parallelism, and dimensional control, which eliminates the need for insert shoe parts.
As can be appreciated from one or more of the drawings, the device 10 includes relatively few parts, including the side plates 26a and 26b, the keeper parts 28a and 28b, the wedge 30, and a connector portion 32 that are assembled together to form the socket 24.
In the illustrated example, the side plates 26a and 26b each include recesses 34 such as slots for assembling the socket 24. In this example, the recesses 34 comprise openings through each side plate 26. Each of the keeper parts 28a and 28b includes tabs 38 with beveled end portions that are received at least partially into a corresponding recess 34. In the illustrated example, the tabs 38 include a generally rectangular cross-sectional profile. Given this description, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize suitable profiles other than rectangular to meet their particular needs.
The side plates 26a and 26b also each include a connector opening 36 for receiving the connector portion 32. In the illustrated example, the connector portion 32 includes a bridge member 44 having an internally threaded opening 33 that receives a rod 35 that secures the device 10 to a support in a known manner. In some examples, a pin P (
In one example, the recesses 34, connector openings 36, tabs 38, and shape of the side plates 26a and 26b and keeper parts 28a and 28b are laser cut from a metal block. Given this description, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize alternative processes and materials for making the socket 24.
In the illustrated example, the side plates 26a and 26b are spaced a uniform distance apart (i.e., are parallel), and the keeper parts 28a and 28b are transverse to each other and generally perpendicular to the side plates 26a and 26b. The terms “parallel” and “perpendicular” as used in this description refer to the nominal relative positioning between the parts and are not intended to be restrictive in a strict geometrical sense.
In the illustrated example, some of the recesses 34 are aligned along a first plane P1 and other recesses 34 are aligned along a second plane P2 with a desired oblique angle α such as 15° between them. In this example, the angle α corresponds to the position of the keeper parts 28a and 28b relative to one another.
In this example, the beveled end portions of the tabs 38 form channels 40 with the recesses 34. In one example, the channels 40 receive a filler material 42 (e.g., braze, solder, or weld filler material) to secure the keeper parts 28a and 28b together with the side plates 26a and 26b. Although the illustrated example shows the beveled end portions of the tabs 38 being flush with the side plates 26a and 26b, in some examples the tabs 38 extend completely through the recesses 34 or only partially into the recesses 34.
Likewise, the connector portion 32 includes a bridge member 44 having beveled ends 46 that are received into the respective connector openings 36. This provides a locking connection similar the locking connection between the tabs 38 and the recesses 34. The bridge member 44 transfers load from the side plates 28a and 28b to the rod 35. Given this description, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize suitable bridge member 44 shapes and configurations other than what is shown to meet their particular needs.
In one example, one or more the surfaces of the wedge 30 and keeper parts 28a and 28b are treated to enhance the gripping characteristics of the socket 24. In one example, contact surfaces 50 of the keeper parts 28a and 28b and wedge 30 are milled, knurled, or grooved in a known manner to increase friction with the load bearing member 22. The separate, distinct keeper parts 28a and 28b provide the benefit of being easily accessible for treatment before assembly with the side plates 26a and 26b.
As can be appreciated from the drawings and description, the designed size of the side plates 26a and 26b and keeper parts 28a and 28b can be scaled up or down to accommodate a variety of desired load bearing capacities. Since the side plates 26a and 26b and keeper parts 28a and 28b are formed or cut from metal blocks instead of bent sheet metal as in some prior designs, there are fewer manufacturing limitations that inhibit scale up compared to previously known arrangements. Additionally, this facilitates flatness, parallelism, and dimensional control.
In another example, the angle α and a wedge angle ω (
This provides the advantage of increasing the breaking strength of the load bearing member 22. In some prior arrangements, breaking of the load bearing member occurs at the entrance of the socket. At this point, tensile stress from the load is a maximum. The stress in the load bearing member is a combination of the tensile stress and orthogonal compressive stress from wedging force. As a result, with evenly distributed wedging pressure, von Mises stress at the entrance of the socket is a maximum. By selecting the right geometry of wedge/socket surfaces, the pressure is redistributed in such a way that maximum pressure will be inside of the socket where tensile stress is lower. That will increase the breaking force of the load bearing member.
In one example, to facilitate precise assembly of the device 10, a positioning member 52 as shown in
To assemble the device 10, the tabs 38 of the keeper parts 28a and 28b are fit into the recesses 34 of the side plates 26a and 26b. In one example, there is some play between the tabs 38 and openings 36. The positioning member 52 is then inserted into the socket 24 between the keeper parts 28a and 28b and side plates 26a and 26b. A positioning member in the shape of the bridge member 44 is also used for aligning the tops of the side plates 28a and 28b. The keeper parts 28a and 28b, side plates 26a and 26b, and positioning member 52 are then clamped together and the distinct pieces are welded, brazed, or soldered (for example) to secure the parts together before removing the positioning member 52. The positioning member 52 maintains a precise alignment between the side plates 26a and 26b and keeper parts 28a and 28b during the welding, brazing, or soldering process. This feature provides the benefit of establishing a precise socket 24 assembly, which is desired for maintaining a wedge in a desired position and achieving uniform load distribution on a load bearing member.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/033569 | 8/29/2006 | WO | 00 | 2/3/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/027030 | 3/6/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2130040 | Siler | Sep 1938 | A |
2482231 | white | Sep 1949 | A |
2540887 | Hyatt | Feb 1951 | A |
2977654 | Page | Apr 1961 | A |
3335470 | Baer | Aug 1967 | A |
3811155 | Stafford | May 1974 | A |
3825984 | Linko et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3905711 | Rogers | Sep 1975 | A |
4295749 | McBride | Oct 1981 | A |
4561154 | Briscoe et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4572565 | Epstein | Feb 1986 | A |
4602891 | McBride | Jul 1986 | A |
4643609 | Biass | Feb 1987 | A |
4716991 | Riechers | Jan 1988 | A |
4718788 | Briscoe | Jan 1988 | A |
RE32847 | Briscoe et al. | Jan 1989 | E |
5199137 | Edwards | Apr 1993 | A |
5553360 | Lucas et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5988929 | Doan | Nov 1999 | A |
6058575 | Dagan | May 2000 | A |
6345419 | Traktovenko | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394007 | Lewis et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6484368 | Rivera et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6513204 | Rivera et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6662408 | Perez et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6994487 | Traktovenko et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7607204 | Ach | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20020154945 | Ericson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040089641 | Launais et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050132873 | Diaz Supisiche et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1395539 | Feb 2003 | CN |
1424975 | Jun 2003 | CN |
2511953 | Sep 1976 | DE |
3143217 | May 1983 | DE |
1642854 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2789609 | Aug 2000 | FR |
1242385 | Sep 1989 | JP |
5039180 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5172190 | Jul 1993 | JP |
2001165245 | Jun 2001 | JP |
1318758 | Jun 1987 | SU |
1736982 | May 1992 | SU |
0073131 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0151400 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0153185 | Jul 2001 | WO |
02085772 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on May 18, 2007 for PCT/US2006/033569. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on Dec. 5, 2008 for PCT/US2006/033569. |
Russian Office action dated Nov. 30, 2011. Russian Federation Application No. 2009111408. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090307876 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |