The present invention relates generally to an electronic over-acceleration and over-speed protection system for an elevator.
Elevators include a safety system to stop an elevator from traveling at excessive speeds in response to an elevator component breaking or otherwise becoming inoperative. Traditionally, elevator safety systems include a mechanical speed sensing device typically referred to as a governor and safeties or clamping mechanisms that are mounted to the elevator car frame for selectively gripping elevator guide rails. If the hoist ropes break or other elevator operational components fail, causing the elevator car to travel at an excessive speed, the governor triggers the safeties to slow or stop the car.
The safeties include brake pads that are mounted for movement with the governor rope and brake housings that are mounted for movement with the elevator car. The brake housings are wedge shaped, such that as the brake pads are moved in a direction opposite from the brake housings, the brake pads are forced into frictional contact with the guide rails. Eventually the brake pads become wedged between the guide rails and the brake housing such that there is no relative movement between the elevator car and the guide rails. To reset the safety system, the brake housing (i.e., the elevator car) must be moved upward while the governor rope is simultaneously released.
One disadvantage with this traditional safety system is that the installation of the governor, including governor and tensioning sheaves and governor rope, is very time consuming. Another disadvantage is the significant number of components that are required to effectively operate the system. The governor sheave assembly, governor rope, and tension sheave assembly are costly and take up a significant amount of space within the hoistway, pit, and machine room. Also, the operation of the governor rope and sheave assemblies generates a significant amount of noise, which is undesirable. Further, the high number of components and moving parts increases maintenance costs. Finally, in addition to being inconvenient, manually resetting the governor and safeties can be time consuming and costly. These disadvantages have an even greater impact in modern high-speed elevators.
An elevator safety system includes a speed detector, an acceleration detector, a mechanical safety, an electromagnetic trigger, and a controller. The speed detector monitors a speed of an elevator system mass including, for example, a car or a counterweight. The acceleration detector monitors an acceleration of the mass. The safety is connected to the mass, and the electromagnetic trigger is connected to the safety. The controller releases the trigger to engage the safety when the speed detector signals an over-speed condition or the acceleration detector signals an over-acceleration condition. The controller also automatically resets the trigger.
In elevator system 10 as shown in
As described above, there are many disadvantages to traditional elevator safety systems including mechanical governors. Embodiments of the present invention therefore include an electronic system capable of triggering the machine room brake and releasing an electromagnetic safety trigger with low hysteresis and with minimal power requirements to engage the safeties when particular car over-speed and/or over-acceleration conditions are detected. The electromagnetic trigger may be reset automatically and may be released to engage the safeties during the reset procedure. An over-speed and over-acceleration detection and processing system is configured to decrease response time and to reduce the occurrence of false triggers caused by conditions unrelated to passenger safety, such as passengers jumping inside the elevator car.
Acceleration detector 44 may be an electronic device that is configured to measure the acceleration of the car 16. Acceleration detector 44 may be, for example, an accelerometer. One type of accelerometer that may be used is a micro electromechanical system (MEMS) that commonly consists of a cantilever beam with a proof mass (also known as seismic mass). Under the influence of acceleration, the proof mass deflects from its neutral position. The deflection of the proof mass may be measured by analog or digital methods. For example, the variation in capacitance between a set of fixed beams and a set of beams attached to the proof mass may be measured.
Controller 48 may be, for example, a circuit board including microprocessor 48A, input/output (I/O) interface 48B, indicators 48C (which may be, for example, light emitting diodes), and safety chain switch 48D. Controller 48 is powered by power source 50 with battery backup 52.
As shown in
In embodiments where speed detector 42 is a tachometer, the tachometer may be mounted to an idler sheave on top of car 16. The idler sheave will rotate at a speed related to the speed of car 16. The tachometer may therefore be configured to measure the speed of the car indirectly by measuring the speed at which the idler sheave rotates. In an alternative embodiment employing a tachometer, for example, in an elevator system with a 1:1 roping arrangement that does not include an idler sheave on the car, a static rope may be suspended in the hoistway adjacent to car 16 and the tachometer may be connected to the rope. For example,
Controller 48 receives inputs from speed detector 42 and acceleration detector 44, and provides an output electromagnetic safety trigger 46. Controller 48 also includes safety chain switch 48D, which forms a part of safety chain 64 of elevator system 40. Safety chain 64 is a series of electro-mechanical devices distributed inside the hoistway and connected to the elevator drive and brake in the machine room.
Electromagnetic safety trigger 46 is arranged on car 16 to be connected to the car safeties, which, for clarity, are not shown in
During operation of elevator system 40, speed detector 42 and acceleration detector 44 sense the speed and acceleration of car 16 traveling inside the hoistway. Controller 48 receives signals from speed detector 42 and acceleration detector 44, and interprets the information to determine if an unsafe over-speed and/or over-acceleration condition has occurred. In the event car 16 experiences an unsafe over-speed and/or over-acceleration condition, controller 48 first opens safety chain switch 48D to safety chain 64 of elevator system 40. Opening switch 48D breaks safety chain 64 to interrupt power to the elevator drive 66 (typically located in the machine room at the upper end of the hoistway) and activate or drop brake 68 on the drive sheave of elevator drive 66. In the event that movement of car 16 is unaffected by dropping the machine room brake 68 (for example, if cables 12 connected to car 16 fail), the over-speed or over-acceleration condition continues to be sensed, and controller 48 releases electromagnetic safety trigger 46. Releasing safety trigger 46 causes the elevator safeties, including, for example, safeties 24 shown in
In
During elevator operation, electromagnetic safety trigger 46 is operable to engage safeties 70, 70B in the event an unsafe over-speed or over-acceleration condition is detected for car 16. As illustrated in
After the safety condition for car 16 has been resolved, trigger 46 may be automatically reset. Linear actuator 74 is configured to extend to position electromagnet 76 to grab link 72, i.e. reestablish the magnetic connection, after link 72 has moved to engage safeties 70, 70B. Linear actuator 74 may then retract electromagnet 76, which is magnetically connected to link 72 to compress spring 78 and disengage safeties 70, 70B. Finally, trigger 46 may engage safeties 70, 70B during a reset operation by causing electromagnet 76 to release link 72 while linear actuator 74 is retracting.
Electromagnet 96 is configured to be magnetized when in a de-energized state and demagnetized when in an energized state. Therefore, during normal safe operation of car 88, electromagnet 96 holds link 92 and compressed coil spring 98 without the need for a continuous supply of electricity. When an unsafe over-speed or over-acceleration condition is detected, trigger 86 may be released to engage the safety connected to lift rod 90 by sending an electrical pulse to electromagnet 96 to defeat the magnetic connection to link 92, thereby releasing the energy stored in compressed spring 98 to cause spring 98 to decompress. Decompressing spring 98, in turn, moves link 92 to move lift rod 90 and thereby engage the safety to slow or stop car 88.
Linear actuator 94 is an electrical actuator including electric motor 94a operably connected to drive shaft 94b. Motor 94a may employ, for example, a ball screw or worm screw drive system to translate the rotational motion of motor 94a into linear motion of shaft 94b. In any case, motor 94a may be non-backdrivable to make trigger 86 more energy efficient and less complex. Non-backdrivable actuators may be set to a particular position, e.g. the extension or retraction position of shaft 94b, and held there without supplying the actuator with a continuous supply of electricity. Drive shaft 94b will only move during a reset operation, first to connect to electromagnet 96, and then to move the safety mechanism back to its reset location.
Although trigger 86 shown in
Generally speaking, elevator systems are designed to detect and engage the elevator safeties under runaway and free fall conditions. A runaway condition is when the elevator machine room brakes fail to hold the car as it travels in either direction generating a threshold maximum acceleration. A free fall condition is an elevator traveling down at 1 g. Activation of the safeties commonly means that disengaging the drive system and dropping the machine room brake has failed or is expected to fail to stop the elevator car from traveling at unsafe speeds and/or accelerations.
Elevator codes specify the maximum speed at which the safeties are required to apply a stopping force to the elevator. Some jurisdictions also specify two speed settings, one to drop the brake and disengage the drive system and one to apply the safeties.
Passengers in elevators can create disturbances over a short period of time that will make the system appear to be over-speeding and/or over-accelerating. Elevator safety devices should not react to these disturbances. Examples of passenger disturbances that do not create unsafe conditions include jumping in the car or bouncing causing the car to oscillate. A passenger can cause, for example, a 2 to 4 hertz oscillation with a 0.4 m/s (1.3 ft/s) amplitude. The safeties should also not be falsely engaged under emergency braking or buffer strikes. Speed signals are usually obtained by some form of traction encoder or transducer including, for example, the tachometer arrangements described above. These devices are subject to momentary false readings due to traction loss. Embodiments of over-acceleration and over-speed detection and processing systems according to the present invention detect elevator system runaway and free fall conditions by distinguishing between over-acceleration and over-speed caused by conditions unrelated to passenger safety and over-acceleration and over-speed caused by unsafe conditions. Upon detecting an actual runaway and/or free fall condition, the systems electronically activate the machine room brake and, where appropriate, trigger the safeties.
Over-acceleration and over-speed detection and processing systems include an electromechanical speed detector and an acceleration detector connected and configured to send signals to a controller as described with reference to and shown in
The raw speed signal captured by the speed detector can be subject to a variety of errors, the most typical being slipping of, for example, a tachometer employed as the speed detector. In order to reduce the impact of such errors on the system, the sensed speed can be combined with a sensed acceleration in such a way as to create a combined (filtered) speed that has an overall smaller error. The filtered speed can be calculated (step 126) using, for example, a proportional plus integral (PI) filter with the measured acceleration fed into the loop to adjust for error conditions including, for example, slippage of the speed detector.
The filtered speed can be calculated as a function of the sensed speed and the sensed acceleration (step 126) by initially multiplying a speed error by a gain to determine a proportional speed error. The speed error is also integrated, and the integrated speed error is multiplied by the gain to determine an integrated proportional speed error. The proportional speed error, the integrated proportional speed error, and the measured acceleration are summed to determine a filtered acceleration. The filtered acceleration is integrated to determine the filtered speed. The filtered speed calculation may be implemented in a continuous loop in which the speed error is equal to the sensed speed minus the filtered speed calculated by the controller in the previous cycle through the loop. The effect of the PI filtering is to make the acceleration information dominate at higher frequencies where the acceleration detector displays higher accuracy than the speed detector, and the speed information dominate at lower frequencies where the speed detector displays higher accuracy than the acceleration detector.
In some embodiments, the acceleration error and the speed error can be monitored during normal elevator operation to detect a failure in the speed or the acceleration detector. The acceleration error and the speed error can be put through a low pass filter and a detector error may be declared if the acceleration error or speed error exceeds a threshold error level.
In addition to calculating the filtered speed (step 126), method 120 includes comparing the filtered speed to a threshold speed to determine if the mass has reached an over-speed condition (step 128). An initial over-speed detection point typically occurs when the speed of the elevator mass exceeds an over-speed threshold that is commonly specified by industry code authorities. The drive and brake system are de-energized when the threshold over-speed is exceeded. However, if an over-speed condition is detected without additional conditions, the system will be sensitive to a variety of disturbances including, for example, people jumping in the car. In order to mitigate these disturbances, a variety of processing techniques may be used, including, for example, signaling an over-speed condition only when the speed of the mass exceeds the threshold speed for a continuous period of time (“over-speed period of time”).
The over-speed period of time may be a fixed value including, for example, 1 second. Alternatively, the over-speed period of time may be calculated as a function of the amount that the filtered speed exceeds the threshold speed. For example,
As described above, in certain circumstances dropping the drive sheave brake will fail to stop the elevator mass, signaling a runaway condition. Method 120 therefore can include the step of releasing an electromechanical safety trigger to engage an elevator safety when the mass stays in the over-speed condition after the drive sheave mechanical brake has been dropped. The trip point at which a runaway condition is signaled can be a function of the speed VT at which the mass accelerating at a set rate A will take a set amount of time Ts to reach a code required speed Vc for applying the stopping force of the safeties. As an example, a 1 m/sec elevator accelerating at an acceleration of 0.26 g may travel from an initial over-speed threshold of 1.057 m/s to a code required speed Vc of 1.43 m/s in 145 milliseconds. It requires 25 milliseconds to activate and engage the safeties. Therefore, the trip speed VT=1.35 m/s, which is the speed at 120 milliseconds (145−25) from 1.057 m/s. This trip speed allows the necessary time (25 milliseconds) to activate the safeties before the code required speed is reached.
In addition to runaway conditions, a separate unsafe condition known as free fall must be accounted for in elevator safety systems. As the name implies, a free falling elevator system mass is falling unimpeded by any braking or safety activation. Mathematically, a free fall condition occurs when the mass is traveling down at 1 g. Because, a free falling mass is unencumbered by brakes or safeties, it will travel from the initial over-speed threshold to the point at which the safeties must start to apply a stopping force in a shorter period of time than a runaway. For example, a 1 m/sec elevator in free fall can travel from an over-speed threshold of 1.057 m/sec to the code required trip point in 45 milliseconds. If the elevator safety system uses the speed of the mass alone, the actuation of the safeties would have to start at a much lower speed, resulting in more false trips from non-safety related disturbances. Therefore a filtered acceleration qualified by speed may be used to remove disturbances and allow for a quicker reaction time.
Method 120 therefore can also include the steps of comparing a filtered acceleration to a threshold acceleration, and measuring how long the mass has been in the over-speed condition. The filtered acceleration is calculated as part of calculating the filtered speed of the mass (step 126) and is equal to the sum of the proportional speed error, the integrated proportional speed error, and the measured acceleration. In the event the filtered acceleration and the over-speed time exceed set thresholds, method 120 can also include dropping the drive sheave brake and engaging the elevator safety simultaneously. For example, the machine room brake and the safeties can be actuated if the filtered acceleration exceeds 0.5 g and the elevator mass is traveling down at a speed greater than the over-speed threshold continuously for 10 milliseconds. Requiring a relatively small continuous period of time over the speed threshold avoids tripping on impact conditions such as a person impacting the platform in a jump. Qualifying the acceleration with the speed information prevents trips during other events including, for example, emergency stops and buffer strikes.
Method 120 can also include filtering raw acceleration measurements at one or more frequencies in order to lessen the influence of external disturbances. Filtering the measured acceleration can include filtering the measured acceleration through one or more of a low pass filter and a bandstop filter in a range of hoistway resonances. For example, the measured acceleration can first be run through a low pass filter to remove high frequency disturbances. Next the acceleration can be run though a bandstop filter to remove the effects from non-safety related oscillations including, for example, people jumping in the car and system excitation during emergency stops. The goal of the bandstop filter is to lessen the effects of hoistway resonances, which can include, for example, 10 db cut off at frequencies 2.5 to 6 Hz.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the claims that follow.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/001646 | 3/16/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/15/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/107407 | 9/23/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5366044 | Jamieson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5869794 | Spiess | Feb 1999 | A |
6161653 | Skalski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173813 | Rebillard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253879 | Skalski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
7228943 | Kugiya et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7267201 | Ito | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7344003 | Kimura et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353916 | Angst | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7533763 | Kattainen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7721852 | Ishioka et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729806 | Ohira | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7849972 | Higashinaka | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8297413 | Kigawa et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8631909 | Draper et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20040079591 | Mueller | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070089938 | Ishioka et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080017456 | Ito | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080060882 | Nuebling | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20120000729 | Marvin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120000732 | Draper et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1860077 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1369372 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1604935 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1780160 | May 2007 | EP |
1864934 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2004010177 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2007521203 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2009023823 | Feb 2009 | JP |
20040029816 | Apr 2004 | KR |
0037348 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0039016 | Jul 2000 | WO |
03091142 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004083091 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005044709 | May 2005 | WO |
2008057116 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
State Intellectual Property Office, P.R. China, First Office Action, Feb. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action, May 21, 2013, 5 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, Office Action, Oct. 15, 2012, 5 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Dec. 18, 2009, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120000731 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |