This invention generally relates to elevator door systems. More particularly, this invention relates to an assembly with a unique roller guide for guiding rollers along a rail for moving an elevator door.
Typical elevator door systems include a door frame supported by rollers that roll along a rail so that the door can be moved between opened and closed positions. The rollers typically are driven along the rail using mechanical links, cables, linear motors or other assemblies. In most instances, the rail is made of a metal material while the rollers include a metal or plastic wheel with a flexible material around the circumference of the wheel that rides along the rail. The flexible material is provided on the roller to dampen or reduce noise and vibration during door movement. Another purpose for providing a flexible material around the circumference of the roller is to provide traction control.
One difficulty associated with conventional roller and rail assemblies is that the rail surface is subject to wear and corrosion. Typical rails are made from steel or aluminum and require a surface treatment to resist wear and corrosion. Although various attempts have been made to coat rails, no surface protection method to date has proven completely satisfactory, in part, because of the unavoidable presence of abrasive debris in an elevator hoistway. Coatings are also undesireably expensive.
The challenge of designing a roller and rail system has become further complicated by the introduction of powered rollers for moving elevator doors. In these instances, the roller and rail interaction must not only support the door but also provide sufficient traction for moving the door. Competing design considerations come into play because the roller must maintain a reasonable contact footprint while, at the same time, having a small enough diameter to fit within the available space design constraints of a typical elevator system.
This invention addresses the needs for prolonging the life of the roller and rail system while enhancing available traction and increasing the longevity of the elevator door assembly. This invention avoids the shortcomings and drawbacks described above.
In general terms, this invention is an assembly for use in an elevator door system that includes a rail and at least one roller that is adapted to move along the rail. The rail includes at least one supporting surface along one side. A resilient track is at least partially received by the supporting surface on the rail. The roller then rolls along the track as the door is moved relative to the rail.
In one example, the track is a flexible insert that is snapped into place on the rail. The track can be removed and replaced over time as may be required.
In another example, the track is a sprayed on material that forms a resilient surface on the supporting surface of the rail.
In another example, the track is a flexible insert that includes several different pieces. Each of the pieces can be made from a different material, for example, to achieve different friction characteristics at different locations along the length of the rail. For example, higher friction is desired at the ends of the rail where the rollers accelerate and decelerate as the elevator door is moved from one extreme to another. A central portion of the track can include a smoother surface that provides quieter door operation.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiments. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
An elevator door assembly 20 includes a door frame 22 supported by a conventional support device 24. The door frame 22 is supported to move along a rail 26 through the movement of rollers 28 so that the door can be moved between opened and closed positions, for example.
A resilient track 30 is included on one side of the rail 26. As best seen in
The first portion 32 and second portion 34 of the track 30 preferably include a traction surface 38, which can be realized in various forms. In one example, the surface of the track 30 is knurled or provided with a roughened surface for increased traction between the roller 28 and the track 30. The central portion or third portion 36 of the track 30 preferably includes a smooth surface 40 that allows for quiet roller operation as the roller rolls along the track 30. The two ends of the track preferably provide enhanced traction to facilitate better acceleration and deceleration at the ends of movement of the door. Since the velocity of the door is typically constant through a central portion of its motion, the smooth surface 40 preferably is provided along a central portion of the track 30. In practice, the third portion 36 typically is much longer than the end portions 32 and 34.
In one example, the first portion 32, the second portion 34 and the third portion 36 of the track 30 are separate pieces of flexible material. Each of the pieces can be individually and selectively replaced as may be needed over the life of the door assembly. Further, each of the track portions can be made from a different material to achieve different friction characteristics along different portions of the rail. Although three portions are illustrated and discussed, it is, of course, possible to use fewer or more portions as the needs of a particular situation may require. Separate pieces allow for easier maintenance or repair since only selected portions may be removed without disassembling the entire roller and rail assembly.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In another example, the resilient track is applied using a spray coating technique. The track 30, in this example, can be applied and replenished over time as may be needed using a conventional spraying technique for applying a flexible material on a supporting surface of the rail 26.
The track 30 preferably is made from a flexible, resilient material. Example materials include polyurethane, polyester elastomers, fluoroelastomers, vulcanized synthetic rubber, other elastomers or other rubber materials. Incorporating a resilient track on the rail provides several advantages compared to prior roller and rail constructions. The track 30 eliminates the need for attempting expensive corrosion and wear resistant measures on the metallic surface of the rail. Moreover, the choice of materials for the rail 26 are expanded and can include softer, more easily extruded materials than was previously possible.
Another advantage to the inventive arrangement is that the roller design is greatly simplified. There is no longer a need to accommodate a flexible material around the exterior of the roller. Moreover, the choice of materials usable for the roller is expanded to include hardenable alloys, stainless steels, chromium, nickel, ceramics, other metals or glasses. Still further, the design of the roller itself is greatly simplified, and can become a simple ring or spool-shaped roller. A more simplified roller configuration allows for more versatility in applying coatings to the roller that will enhance wear resistance and corrosion resistance.
Another advantage to using the inventive system is that a roller drive mechanism can be incorporated into the rollers. For example, in
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations or modifications to the disclosed examples of the inventive arrangement may become apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes, however, do not necessarily depart from the scope or spirit of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/648,016, which was filed on Aug. 25, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,945,364 issued Sep. 20, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1881014 | Ayers | Oct 1932 | A |
1881017 | Jacobson | Oct 1932 | A |
2303263 | Fisher | Nov 1942 | A |
2493162 | Olds | Jan 1950 | A |
2611920 | Borden | Sep 1952 | A |
3426480 | Dzamba | Feb 1969 | A |
3855732 | Sheaf | Dec 1974 | A |
4016920 | Shepard | Apr 1977 | A |
4177881 | Kappenhagen | Dec 1979 | A |
4262451 | Dallaire | Apr 1981 | A |
4355486 | Sherwood | Oct 1982 | A |
4905345 | Lunenschloss et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5036621 | Iwasaki | Aug 1991 | A |
5165142 | Pilsbury | Nov 1992 | A |
5594316 | Hayashida | Jan 1997 | A |
5655626 | Spiess | Aug 1997 | A |
5667039 | Spiess | Sep 1997 | A |
5701973 | Tracey | Dec 1997 | A |
5711112 | Barten et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5852897 | Sukale | Dec 1998 | A |
5959373 | Cho | Sep 1999 | A |
6543581 | Durand et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6581332 | Kim | Jun 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040124038 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09648016 | Aug 2000 | US |
Child | 10735201 | US |