Elevator systems typically require periodic maintenance, repair or both. Routine maintenance typically occurs on a scheduled basis. The type of elevator system and the components that are installed typically dictate the maintenance schedule. The actual need for maintenance, however, is typically dictated by use of the elevator system. Preset maintenance schedules, therefore, can result in maintenance being performed before it is necessary. This introduces additional cost and takes up the time of elevator mechanics who might otherwise perform other services on other systems.
For purposes of repairing an elevator system a mechanic typically has to visit the installation, diagnose the situation and take any corrective action that may be required.
There have been advances in remote elevator monitoring including communications between elevator systems and central control facilities that are located remotely from the installation of the elevator system. In most instances, however, there still is a need for dispatching a mechanic to the elevator system to perform the required repair or adjustment.
An exemplary elevator system includes a controller that is configured to determine a condition of at least one elevator system component. A message transceiver is coupled with the controller. The message transceiver is configured to send a notification message to a remotely located mobile station that includes an indication of the condition determined by the controller. The message transceiver is configured to receive a response message from the remotely located mobile station that indicates how the controller can address the determined condition.
In one example, the message transceiver is a short message service (SMS) transceiver and the notification and response messages each comprise a SMS message. The notification message provides a mechanic with an indication of a current condition of at least one component of the elevator system. The response message allows the mechanic to provide an indication to the controller of the elevator system for automatically responding to the condition that is the subject of the notification message.
An exemplary method of addressing a condition of an elevator system includes using a controller of the elevator system to determine a condition of at least one component of the elevator system. The controller communicates with a message transceiver regarding the determined condition. The message transceiver sends a notification message to a remotely located mobile station. The notification message includes an indication of the determined condition. A response message received from the remotely located mobile station indicates how the controller can address the determined condition.
The various features and advantages of a disclosed example embodiment will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The elevator system 20 includes a plurality of operational components 27. Example components schematically represented at 27 include a printed circuit board.
Movement of the elevator car 22 depends upon the operation of movement components schematically shown at 28. Example elevator system movement components include a machine, motor, brake, drive, hoisting ropes, sheaves and other components used for moving the elevator car 22.
A controller 30 is configured to control operation of the elevator system 20, in part, by determining a condition of at least one of the elevator system components. The controller 30 is configured to determine when an elevator system component is malfunctioning or if there is a problem associated with a component, for example. Given this description and known techniques for programming a controller to determine elevator system component conditions, those skilled in the art will be able to realize a controller that will perform the functions of the example controller 30 in a manner that meets the needs of their particular situation.
The controller 30 communicates with a message transceiver 32 that is configured to wirelessly communicate with a mobile station 34. The message transceiver 32 is configured to send notification messages to the mobile station 34 regarding conditions determined by the controller 30. The message transceiver 32 is also configured to receive response messages from the mobile station 34 that include an indication of how the controller 30 can address a determined condition that is the subject of a notification message. The illustrated example arrangement allows for using wireless communication techniques such as messaging services to facilitate automated elevator system maintenance and repair in a manner that does not require a mechanic visiting the site of the elevator system to perform diagnosis and adjustment, for example.
In one example, the message transceiver 32 communicates with the mobile station 34 over a wireless link available through a conventional cellular phone service provider. The messages transmitted between the mobile station 34 and the message transceiver 32 in one example comprise short message service (SMS) messages. In one such example, the mobile station 34 comprises a cellular phone or a smart phone.
With the illustrated example, a mechanic or technician can receive a message regarding a condition of an elevator system, determine whether some action taken by the elevator system itself might address that condition and send a message that serves as an instruction to the elevator system for addressing the condition. The illustrated example allows for utilizing the knowledge and experience of the mechanic without requiring a mechanic to be onsite at the location of the elevator system and without requiring the mechanic to perform any action for addressing a system that the mechanic becomes aware of through a notification message received on the mobile station 34.
In one example, the remote station portion 42 includes memory that has a plurality of predetermined SMS messages. The controller 30 selects an appropriate message from the memory and provides it to the transceiver 32, which transmits that message to one or more remotely located mobile stations 34. In some examples, each of the plurality of inputs 44 is dedicated to a particular type of condition that can be determined by the controller 30.
The example transceiver 32 includes a plurality of outputs 48 in communication with the remote station portion 42 of the controller 30. When a response message is received from the mobile station 34, the transceiver 32 provides an indication regarding the response message to the controller 30. In some examples, the actual content of the response message will be provided directly to the controller 30. The controller 30 is programmed to recognize the content of a response message and to take action following a corresponding instruction indication, for example.
The illustrated example transceiver portion 32 is configured as a cellular communication device having its own subscriber identity module (SIM) card 52, which allows for the message transceiver 32 to communicate over wireless channels facilitated by cellular communication service providers, for example. The SIM card 52 in the illustrated example works like a SIM card included in a mobile station, for example.
As illustrated in
In this example, a serial connection between controllers facilitates communications with the transceiver 32. The controller 30 linked directly to the transceiver (i.e., without any other intervening controllers between it and the transceiver 32) serves as a master controller while the others are slaves for purposes of communications through the transceiver 32. Such a serial arrangement conserves wiring for connecting the transceiver 32 to a plurality of controllers 30.
A single transceiver 32 also may communicate with a plurality of mobile stations 34 when a corresponding plurality of predetermined phone numbers for those mobile stations is programmed into the transceiver 32.
Once the failure condition information has been collected at 62 it will be classified at 66. One example includes classifying the information as pertaining to a need for elevator maintenance, pertaining to a condition in which an elevator is blocked or pertaining to a condition in which an elevator is running but with disturbances. Classifying the condition allows for identifying the status of the elevator system component at 68.
In some examples, the controller 30 may be able to take action to address the situation as schematically shown at 70 by activating a component reset, for example. Whenever it is necessary to send a notification message, the determined status of the component is communicated through a notification message such as a SMS message. The status information determined by the controller 30 is shown at 72 in
Example determinations regarding components associated with the motion control subsystem 28 includes checking encoder wiring at 90, checking parameter setup at 92 and checking load weighing at 94. If one or more of those checks reveals a deviation from a desired performance, a notification message indicating a need for elevator maintenance will be sent.
Example determinations regarding the door control subsystem schematically shown at 26 include checking door panels at 96, checking door close buttons at 98 and checking the setup for door time at 100.
Given this description, those skilled in the art will realize other determinations or conditions to include for purposes of generating a notification message.
The illustrated example allows for detecting elevator failures and operating conditions in an automated fashion and allowing for a mechanic or technician to remotely react to those determinations for purposes of making an adjustment in the operation or condition of one or more elevator system components. In some cases, a mechanic may direct the controller 30 to take corrective action by sending an appropriate response message without requiring the mechanic to arrive on site. This facilitates returning an elevator car to service more quickly and, for example, allows a trapped passenger to exit an elevator car much sooner than a mechanic would be able to arrive at the location of the elevator system.
In some examples, the controller 30 provides a notification that a response message was received with updated condition information in a follow-up notification message sent by the transceiver 32. This allows a mechanic to verify correction or to determine a need for further attention.
In some examples the mechanic may send an inquiry message to the transceiver 32 requesting status information from the controller 30. This allows a mechanic to evaluate an elevator system remotely even when the controller 30 has not determined that a notification message should be sent.
One of the features of the illustrated example is that it takes advantage of existing communication technology and provides an economical solution for addressing elevator maintenance, service and repair requirements anywhere where cellular communication services are available.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed example may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/056261 | 10/14/2011 | WO | 00 | 4/8/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/055346 | 4/18/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3209324 | Diamond | Sep 1965 | A |
3973648 | Hummert | Aug 1976 | A |
4512442 | Moore et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4568909 | Whynacht | Feb 1986 | A |
4697243 | Moore | Sep 1987 | A |
4771865 | Hinderling | Sep 1988 | A |
6330936 | Lence Barreiro et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6364066 | Bolch | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6439350 | Lence Barreiro et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484125 | Huang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6543583 | Lence Barreiro et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6604611 | Liu et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6854565 | Perala | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6998995 | Nakajima | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7073633 | Weinberger | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079982 | Ogura et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7350626 | Lence | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7448473 | Lindberg | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7617029 | Loda | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7699142 | Wurth | Apr 2010 | B1 |
8069958 | Lence-Barreiro | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8893858 | Shi | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20030000777 | Lence Barreiro et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20090218178 | Lence-Barreiro | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2243738 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2312057 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2002060152 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2007320703 | Dec 2007 | JP |
1999-0074721 | Oct 1999 | KR |
20050057891 | Jun 2005 | KR |
20070091263 | Sep 2007 | KR |
2007045837 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2011034527 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic China, First Search, Application No. 201180074145.0 dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2011/056261 dated Apr. 24, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2011/056261 dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 11874088.5, received Jun. 22, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140262629 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |