This invention relates to an elevator toe guard assembly that may be used where an elevator pit of lesser depth than the standard is provided.
An elevator toe guard extends downwardly from the lower front sill of an elevator car. The toe guard is an important safety feature since it provides a barrier between a landing and the hoistway when the car is not aligned with the landing. For example should the car become trapped between floors, a toe guard reduces the danger of a person attempting to rescue the passengers, or the passengers themselves, falling into the hoistway. It would also prevent the possibility of a passenger's foot becoming trapped between the underneath of the elevator car and the edge of the landing if for any reason the landing doors are opened before the car is properly aligned with the floor of the landing.
Regulations and good safety practice dictate a minimum height for toe guards. Clearly in order to accommodate such a toe guard fixed to the bottom of an elevator car, the elevator pit must be sufficiently deep that the toe guard will not strike the bottom of the pit even if the elevator travels below the lowest landing and onto the buffers. On the other hand however, there is an increasing trend in modern elevator installations for a shallower pit. A shallower pit is desirable since it reduces the overall cost of installing an elevator system and represents a lesser constraint on the design of the building. Furthermore, it is often the case in older existing installations that are being updated or renewed to have a pit depth less than the standard. This represents a problem since it is undesirable and/or prohibited from a safety point of view to shorten the toe guard.
Several proposals for overcoming this problem have been described. For example, in EP-A-1118576 several mechanically complex proposals are advanced for retracting the toe guard where the pit depth is limited. However, these proposals are complex and therefore costly to produce and/or are difficult to conform to other requirements such as impact resistance.
A simpler proposal is described in WO 02/060802. In this disclosure a two-part toe guard assembly is described. One of the parts is fixed to the bottom of the elevator car whilst the other part is mounted so as to be able to slide on the fixed part. The sliding part is normally retained in its extended position under its own weight but in the event that the bottom of the toe guard should strike the floor of the pit, the sliding parts will simply be pushed upwardly relative to the fixed part thereby avoiding damage. Although this solution is an elegant and cost-effective one, it has been found in practice that it is difficult for the sliding part of the toe guard to meet some impact resistance requirements. It is an aim of the present invention therefore to provide an alternative toe guard arrangement and accordingly the present invention provides an elevator car comprising a single, rigid toe guard member slidably mounted to the bottom of the car so as to be slidable upwards in the event that the toe guard member strikes the bottom of a hoist way pit.
Thus it will be seen by those skilled in the art that in accordance with the invention whilst the toe guard still has the advantage of being retractable thereby allowing it to be used in installations with a shallower pit than the standard depth, whilst at the same time allowing the entire toe guard to comply with impact resistance requirements.
The toe guard member is preferably slidably mounted to the car door sill bracket. It may only be mounted to this bracket but preferably one or more strengthening brackets are provided that depend downwardly from the underside of the car and to which the toe guard member is slidably mounted. Such a bracket or brackets imparts a greater lateral impact resistance to the toe guard and thus facilitates meeting impact resistance requirements. The strengthening bracket(s) is preferably rigid and will therefore be shorter than the toe guard member and indeed short enough to be accommodated in the minimum vertical clearance in the pit when the elevator is at its lowest possible position—e.g. resting on its buffers.
In some embodiments a safety switch may be provided to stop the elevator in the event that the toe guard member is pushed to the upper most end of its travel. This ensures that the elevator will be stopped and the toe guard will not be damaged if it should be pushed up for any other reason than striking the base of the pit, e.g. if an object should become stuck in the shaft.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring first to
The toe guard member 10 is mounted to the door sill bracket 2 by a series of six rearwardly projecting threaded studs which are riveted to the front face of the toe guard member 10 and which move along corresponding slots. Thus a pair of studs 12 project rearwardly from close to the top edge of the toe guard plate 10 and travel within corresponding slots formed in the vertical portion 6 of the door sill bracket. Middle and lower pairs of studs 16, 18 project into corresponding pairs of vertical slots 20, 22 formed in two vertically extending brackets 24 riveted to corresponding to sill bracket gussets 8. Plastic bushings 26 are provided around each of the studs 12, 16, 18 thereby preventing direct metal to metal contact between the rear face of the toe guard member 10 and the respective brackets 6, 24.
It will be seen that three unshaped rebates are formed in the top edge of the toe guard member 10 to accommodate respective rivet heads 28 on the vertical car door sill (6). This prevents the top edge of the toe guard member 10 catching on these rivet heads 28 when it is pushed upwardly.
Operation of the toe guard assembly will now be described. In normal operation the toe guard member 10 hangs under its own weight so that each of the studs 12, 16, 18 sits at the bottom end of the respective slot 14, 20, 22. The plastic bushings substantially prevent metal to metal scraping noises being generated.
If the car should move below the lowest landing onto the buffers e.g. during maintenance or malfunction, the bottom 10a of the toe guard member may strike the pit floor. However, further downward movement of the car may be accommodated since the studs 12, 16, 18 will all be able to move up their corresponding slots 14, 20, 22 thus allowing the entire toe guard member 10 to slide upwardly. This upward movement is guided by the vertical slots 14, 20, 22 and by the plastic bushings 26. When the elevator car travels upwardly again off the buffers, the toe guard member 10 will simply fall back down again under its own weight.
Thus it will be seen that the described embodiment allows a full length toe guard member to be used even where there is insufficient pit clearance to accommodate it by allowing the toe guard member to slide upwardly relative to the bottom of the car. Furthermore, the one piece construction of the toe guard member 10 which all slides as one is both relatively inexpensive to produce but affords sufficient lateral resistance to meet elevator safety requirements.
During normal use of the elevator the cam toe guard member hangs down in the position shown in
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB04/00676 | 3/9/2004 | WO | 00 | 7/17/2006 |