The invention is in the field of microcavity plasma devices, also known as microdischarge devices or microplasma devices.
Microcavity plasma devices produce a nonequilibrium, low temperature plasma within, and essentially confined to, a cavity having a characteristic dimension d below approximately 500 μm. This new class of plasma devices exhibits several properties that differ substantially from those of conventional, macroscopic plasma sources. Because of their small physical dimensions, microcavity plasmas normally operate at gas (or vapor) pressures considerably higher than those accessible to macroscopic devices. For example, microplasma devices with a cylindrical microcavity having a diameter of 200-300 μm (or less) are capable of operation at rare gas (as well as N2 and other gases tested to date) pressures up to and beyond one atmosphere.
Such high pressure operation is advantageous. An example advantage is that, at these higher pressures, plasma chemistry favors the formation of several families of electronically-excited molecules, including the rare gas dimers (Xe2, Kr2, Ar2, . . . ) and the rare gas-halides (such as XeCl, ArF, and Kr2F) that are known to be efficient emitters of ultraviolet (UV), vacuum ultraviolet (VUV), and visible radiation. This characteristic, in combination with the ability of microplasma devices to operate in a wide range of gases or vapors (and combinations thereof), offers emission wavelengths extending over a broad spectral range. Furthermore, operation of the plasma in the vicinity of atmospheric pressure minimizes the pressure differential across the packaging material when a microplasma device or array is sealed.
Research by the present inventors and colleagues at the University of Illinois has resulted in news microcavity plasma device structures as well as applications. As an example, semiconductor fabrication processes have been adapted to produce large arrays of microplasma devices in silicon wafers with the microcavities having the form of an inverted pyramid. Arrays with 250,000 devices, each device having an emitting aperture of 50×50 μm2, have been demonstrated with a device packing density and array filling factor of 104 cm−2 and 25%, respectively. Other microplasma devices have been fabricated in ceramic multilayer structures, photodefinable glass, and Al/Al2O3 structures.
Microcavity plasma devices developed over the past decade have a wide variety of applications. An exemplary application for a microcavity plasma device array is to a display. Since the diameter of single cylindrical microcavity plasma devices, for example, is typically less than 200-300 μm, devices or groups of devices offer a spatial resolution that is desirable for a pixel in a display. In addition, the efficiency of a microcavity plasma device can exceed that characteristic of conventional plasma display panels, such as those in high definition televisions.
Early microcavity plasma devices exhibited short lifetimes because of exposure of the electrodes to the plasma and the ensuing damage caused by sputtering. Polycrystalline silicon and tungsten electrodes extend lifetime but are more costly materials and difficult to fabricate.
Large-scale manufacturing of microcavity plasma device arrays benefits from structures and fabrication methods that reduce cost and increase reliability. Previous work conducted by some of the present inventors has resulted in thin, inexpensive metal/metal oxide arrays of microcavity plasma devices. Metal/metal oxide lamps are formed from thin sheets of oxidized electrodes, are simple to manufacture and can be conveniently fabricated by mass production techniques such as roll-to-roll processing. In some manufacturing techniques, the arrays are formed by oxidizing a metal screen, or other thin metal sheet having cavities formed in it, and then joining the screen to a common electrode. The metal/metal oxide lamps are light, thin, and can be flexible.
The invention provides ellipsoidal microcavity plasma devices and arrays that are formed in layers that also seal the plasma medium, i.e., gas(es) and/or vapors. No separate packaging layers are required and, therefore, additional packaging can be omitted if it is desirable to do so. A preferred microcavity plasma device includes first and second thin layers that are joined together. A half ellipsoid microcavity or plurality of half ellipsoid microcavities is present in one or both of the first and second thin layers and electrodes are arranged with respect to the microcavity to excite a plasma within the microcavities upon application of a predetermined voltage to the electrodes. In preferred embodiments, the ellipsoidal microcavities are formed in glass. In other embodiments, the ellipsoidal microcavities are formed in other materials that are transparent to a wavelength of interest, including many types of ceramics and polymers.
A method for forming a microcavity plasma device having a plurality of half or fill ellipsoid microcavities in one or both of the first and second thin layers is also provided by a preferred embodiment. The method includes defining a pattern of protective polymer on the first thin layer. Powder blasting forms half ellipsoid microcavities in the first and/or second thin layers. The second thin layer is joined to the first layer. The patterning can be conducted lithographically or can be conduced with a simple screen.
The invention provides microcavity plasma devices and arrays having ellipsoidal microcavities fabricated in glass or other materials, such as ceramic or polymer materials, that are transparent at the wavelength(s) of interest. Devices and arrays of the invention are extremely robust and inexpensive to fabricate. Microcavities are formed in thin layers, which are transparent and can be flexible. As the microcavities are formed directly in transparent material and preferred arrays are completed upon a hard sealing of the two transparent sheets, no further packaging of the array is necessary. The packaging layer that seals vapor(s) and/or gas(es) into the microcavities is realized by the same sheet that serves as the substrate in which the microcavities are formed.
The invention also provides powder blasting methods of manufacturing microcavity plasma devices and arrays of microcavity plasma devices. Microcavities having an ellipsoidal (“egg shell” or “half egg shell”) geometry are produced in thin sheets of glass, ceramics or polymers by an inexpensive nanopowder blasting technique that allows for considerable control over the cavity cross-section. Methods of the invention can produce large arrays of microplasma devices that substantially consist of a pair of thin glass, ceramic or polymer sheets.
A preferred microcavity plasma device includes first and second thin layers that are joined together. A half ellipsoid or full ellipsoidal microcavity (or plurality of half ellipsoid or full ellipsoidal microcavities) is defined, and one or both of the first and second thin layers and electrodes are arranged with respect to the microcavity to excite a plasma within said microcavities upon application of a predetermined voltage to the electrodes.
A method for forming a microcavity plasma device having a plurality of half or full ellipsoid microcavities in one or both of first and second thin layers is also provided by a preferred embodiment. The method includes defining a pattern of protective polymer on the first thin layer. Powder blasting forms half ellipsoid microcavities in the first and, if desired, second thin layers. The second thin layer is joined to the first layer. The patterning can be conducted lithographically or can be conduced with a simple screen.
Preferred embodiments will now be discussed with respect to the drawings. The drawings include schematic figures that are not to scale, which will be fully understood by skilled artisans with reference to the accompanying description. Features may be exaggerated for purposes of illustration. From the preferred embodiments, artisans will recognize broader aspects of the invention.
The sheets 14a and 14b can be very thin, the thickness being limited only by the ability to handle large sheets during manufacturing. In example prototype glass arrays produced in the laboratory, the thickness t2 of each glass sheet was nominally 600 μm to 1 mm. It is expected that glass sheets at least as thin as 300 μm will also be acceptable. Typical major diameters (height or vertical dimension) (2×t1) of the egg-shaped microcavities 12 were 100 μm to 1 mm in the laboratory experiments. Typical minor diameters t3 (width or horizontal dimension) of the central region of the microcavities 12, which is the characteristic dimension of the microcavities, were in the range of 10-500 μm. The dimensions labeled d1, d2, and d3 represent, respectively, the transverse width of an ellipsoidal cavity 12, and the horizontal and vertical spacing between adjacent rows and columns of cavities 12 in the array 10.
The steps discussed above are repeated to produce an identical microcavity array pattern in another glass substrate, and the two glass substrates are joined as the cavities are filled with the desired gas or vapor and sealed to produce the array 10. In another variation, the second glass sheet 14a does not have any microcavities, but is a plain glass sheet with the electrode 16. The microcavities in such a case possess a “half-egg” shape, but can also support plasma generation. Indeed, experiments with “half-ellipsoidal” microcavity plasma devices show them to produce an intense glow that is more spatially localized (around the axis transverse to the glass sheets) than is the case with full ellipsoids.
Higher resolution and more precise spacing are offered by a preferred embodiment fabrication process that is illustrated in
Fabrication methods of the invention enable reproducible tailoring of the microcavity cross-sectional geometry for the purpose of achieving a desired electric field profile within the cavity. As an example, prolonging the powder blasting produces a pronounced tapering of the half-cavity being formed. This has been demonstrated experimentally, and such tapering has the effect of accentuating the electric field in this region when the two half-cavities are bonded together and a voltage is applied to the electrodes. In an experimental example, cavities with a pronounced taper were produced with an electric field that is much weaker along the vertical axis (major diameter) of the cavity than near the walls of the microcavity at its central region near the minor diameter (walls intersected by the minor diameter. If the powder blasting step is intentionally shortened in time, the cavity sidewalls will be nearly vertical at the mid-plane of the cavity, resulting in an electric field profile that is much more spatially uniform.
The aspect ratio of blasted microcavities is also dependent on the pressure of the blasting process, the type of powder material used in the blasting, and the type of masking materials used in the fabrication. Typical values of the aspect ratio (depth to width) of the microcavity can be range between 1:1 and 3:1. Such aspect ratios can be achieved with a pressure of about 30 psi to 120 psi.
Additional embodiment microcavity plasma device arrays are realized with alternative electrode placements and patterns and other variations. In illustrating the additional embodiments, the reference numbers from
In
The embodiments illustrated in
Central electrode microcavity plasma devices of the invention fabricated in glass provide additional options for tailoring the electric field. Experimental devices in accordance with the
In a variation of the
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it should be understood that other modifications, substitutions and alternatives are apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Such modifications, substitutions and alternatives can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which should be determined from the appended claims.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This invention was made with Government assistance under U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant Nos. F49620-03-1-0391 and AF FA9550-07-1-0003. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3755027 | Gilsing | Aug 1973 | A |
3908147 | Hall et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3970887 | Smith et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4808883 | Iwaya et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5200973 | Ford | Apr 1993 | A |
5574327 | Cammack et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
6016027 | DeTemple et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6139384 | DeTemple et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6194833 | DeTemple et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6437507 | Ha | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6456007 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6541915 | Eden et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563257 | Vojak et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6657370 | Geusic | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6695664 | Eden et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6815891 | Cliff et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828730 | Eden et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6867548 | Eden et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7112918 | Eden et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126266 | Park et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7195733 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20020113553 | Vojak et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030080664 | Eden et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080688 | Eden et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030132693 | Eden et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030164684 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030230983 | Vonallmen | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040100194 | Eden et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040134778 | Stelzle et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160162 | Eden et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050148270 | Eden et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050191783 | Toyoda et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195393 | Karanassios | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050269953 | Eden et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012297 | Lee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038490 | Eden et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060071598 | Eden et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082319 | Eden et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084262 | Qin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060284558 | Kwon et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070108906 | Kang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070108910 | Eden et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114936 | Park et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070170866 | Eden et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070200499 | Eden et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070236146 | Kang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080003142 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080129185 | Eden et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080290799 | Eden et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100001629 | Eden et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003109523 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-0045540 | Jun 2003 | KR |
10-2005-0113533 | Feb 2005 | KR |
WO 2007011865 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007011865 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007087285 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007087371 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008013820 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100072893 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |