Embedded motion sensing technology for integration within commercial ultrasound probes

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11631342
  • Patent Number
    11,631,342
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 13, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 18, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
An ultrasound system including an ultrasound machine and an ultrasound probe. The ultrasound probe includes an ultrasound transducer, ultrasound circuitry, a six degree of freedom (6-DOF) sensor, and a probe housing. The probe housing encases the ultrasound transducer and the 6-DOF sensor. By embedding motion-sensing technology directly within the housing of the ultrasound transducer, the position and orientation of the ultrasound probe can be tracked in an automated manner in relation to an indicator mark on the ultrasound screen. This allows assisting technologies to mitigate human error that arises from misalignment of the transducer indicator.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to ultrasound probes, ultrasound probe systems, and ultrasound probe training systems.


BACKGROUND ART

Medical ultrasound hardware utilizes a mechanical transducer to broadcast high-frequency acoustic waves through the human body and then measure the reflection as a means for imaging. To use ultrasound imaging in the clinical setting, ultrasound operators must follow a strict convention to ensure that the image is oriented appropriately and the underlying anatomy is diagnosed correctly. By convention, the transducer is marked with a protruding indicator that must be oriented towards a patient's head or anatomic-right side during scanning. To aid guidance, a matching probe indicator icon is displayed on the screen of the ultrasound machine as a reference (generally on the left side of the screen). Maintaining this strict orientation takes on added significance when performing image-guided interventions (e.g., needle insertion), which may result in catastrophic implications if not performed correctly. For instance, a common pitfall, especially for novice users, is to inadvertently reverse the indicator default setting and erroneously orient the transducer as they are performing an incorrectly oriented, image-guided medical intervention.


However, by embedding motion-sensing technology directly within the housing of the ultrasound transducer (ultrasound probe), the position and orientation of the device can be tracked in relation to an indicator mark on the ultrasound screen in an automated manner, allowing assisting technologies to mitigate human error that arises from misalignment of the transducer indicator. As an example, motion sensors can be used to detect misalignment and provide visual or auditory alerts to notify the user about the probe indicator alignment (e.g., a probe indicator icon moves along the ultrasound screen in relation to the actual probe's orientation relative to a patient's body-rather than a preset position).


Furthermore, motion sensing hardware is employed by commercial solutions that provide real-time or just-in-time refresher training of ultrasound skills in a simulated environment. These simulators employ a motion-controlled handheld device in the shape of an ultrasound probe to recreate the experience of using a real device on a wide selection of pre-recorded patient cases with or without serious clinical pathologies. However, these simulators are currently only available as dedicated workstations or software packages for personal computers (PCs) and require an ad hoc external handheld motion sensing peripheral device for control. As a result, it is not possible to currently integrate the benefits of ultrasound training simulators within a real ultrasound device. The addition of an embedded motion sensor directly inside an ultrasound transducer will make this possible.


Having motion-sensing technology embedded directly within the housing of an ultrasound transducer will enable ultrasound devices to operate in two separate modes: a standard mode that allows the user to scan real patients using the traditional physics of ultrasound as is done currently, and a training mode that will instead allow the user to employ the same ultrasound probe as a motion sensing peripheral to navigate a multitude of existing patient cases augmented with annotations that help the operator expand and refine his or her knowledge of ultrasound imaging.


A typical handheld motion sensor utilizes various sensing components to measure displacement and orientation in three-dimensional (3D) space. While many technologies exist for tracking motion in space, inertial solutions allow the sensor package to retain a small form factor and work without needing additional external components to act as a fixed point of reference. Most inertial solutions combine accelerometers, gyroscopes, and a magnetometer in a single package to measure inertial motion and relate the orientation of the device with respect to the gravity vector and the earth's magnetic field. Whereas it has been previously proposed that this technology reside in a plastic casing of its own, it is now proposed that the electronic hardware be embedded and integrated within the plastic housing of current medical ultrasound transducers.


Also, to improve the fidelity of the simulation in training mode, an additional sensor (a “6+1 DOF” sensor) may be added to the embedded package for measuring compression, allowing the user to investigate the elastic properties of the underlying anatomy in the simulated environment by pressing the tip of the device against a surface with varying amounts of force.


DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention can be described generally as an ultrasound system that includes an ultrasound machine and an ultrasound probe. The ultrasound machine displays an ultrasound image, and the ultrasound probe communicates with the ultrasound machine. The ultrasound probe includes an ultrasound transducer, ultrasound circuitry, a six degree of freedom (6-DOF) sensor, and a probe housing. The probe housing encases the ultrasound transducer and the 6-DOF sensor.


The ultrasound transducer transmits acoustic waves and measures the reflected waves to produce a reflected wave signal. The ultrasound circuitry receives the reflected wave signal from the ultrasound transducer and transmits an image signal to the ultrasound machine. The 6-DOF sensor measures the position and orientation of the ultrasound probe. Accordingly, the position and the orientation of the ultrasound probe may be tracked.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic of an embodiment of the disclosed ultrasound system.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of an embodiment of the disclosed ultrasound system shown in standard mode, where the ultrasound probe is used to scan a real patient.



FIG. 3 is a schematic of an embodiment of the disclosed ultrasound system shown in training mode, where the same ultrasound probe as shown in FIG. 2 is now is used as a motion sensing peripheral to navigate existing patient cases.



FIG. 4 is a schematic of an embodiment of the disclosed ultrasound system that includes a compression sensor.





BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of presently-preferred embodiments of the invention and is not intended to represent the only forms in which the present invention may be constructed or utilized. The description sets forth the functions and the sequence of steps for constructing and operating the invention in connection with the illustrated embodiments. However, it is to be understood that the same or equivalent functions and sequences may be accomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to be encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention.


The ultrasound system 100 includes an ultrasound machine 102 and an ultrasound probe 104. The ultrasound machine 102 displays an ultrasound image 106. In a version of the invention, the image displayed by the ultrasound machine 102 includes a probe indicator icon 108. In another embodiment, the ultrasound probe 104 also includes a reference indicator 110, which is a direction indicator to orient the ultrasound probe 104.


The ultrasound probe 104 communicates with the ultrasound machine 102. In a version of the invention, the ultrasound probe 104 communicates with the ultrasound machine 102 through a data cable 112. In other versions, the communication is wireless.


The ultrasound probe 104 includes an ultrasound transducer 114, ultrasound circuitry 116, a six degree of freedom (6-DOF) sensor 118, and a probe housing 120. The probe housing 120 encases the ultrasound transducer 114 and the 6-DOF sensor 118.


The ultrasound transducer 114 transmits acoustic waves 122 and measures the reflected acoustic waves 122 to produce a reflected wave signal 124. The ultrasound circuitry 116 receives the reflected wave signal 124 from the ultrasound transducer 114 and transmits an image signal 126 to the ultrasound machine 102. The 6-DOF sensor 118 measures the position and orientation of the ultrasound probe 104.


Preferably, the 6-DOF sensor 118 is an inertial sensor. In an embodiment, the 6-DOF sensor 118 includes an accelerometer 130, a gyroscope 132, and a magnetometer 134. The 6-DOF sensor 118 can be used to detect misalignment and provide a visual alert (for example, in conjunction with the probe indicator icon 108) or an auditory alert to the user about the reference indicator 110 alignment.


In a version of the invention, the ultrasound probe 104 also includes a sensing head 128 at which the ultrasound transducer 114 transmits acoustic waves 122 and measures reflected waves.


In a preferred version, the ultrasound probe 104 also includes a compression sensor 136 that measures the force 138 applied to the sensing head 128. In that version, the probe housing 120 also encases the compression sensor 136. The compression sensor 136 allows the user to investigate the elastic properties of the underlying anatomy in the simulated environment by pressing the tip of the device (for example, the sensing head 128) against a surface with varying amounts of force 138. Preferably, the compression sensor 136 is a resistive strain gauge or other mechanical means that will not interfere with the operation of the ultrasound transducer 114. If the compression sensor 136 interferes with the operation of the ultrasound transducer 114, in some versions the compression sensor 136 may be disabled mechanically when the ultrasound system 100 is operated in the standard mode. In an alternative embodiment, the ultrasound transducer 114 (which is typically built using a highly sensitive piezoelectric element) can itself be used to measure compression directly without a separate compression sensor 136.


With motion-sensing technology embedded directly within the probe housing 120, the ultrasound system 100 can operate in two separate modes: a standard mode that allows the user to use the ultrasound probe 104 to scan real patients using the traditional physics of ultrasound as is done currently, and a training mode that will instead allow the user to employ the same ultrasound probe 104 as a motion sensing peripheral to navigate existing patient cases, perhaps augmented with annotations 140 that help the operator expand and refine his or her knowledge of ultrasound imaging.


More specifically, an ultrasound system 100 equipped with this novel kind of ultrasound probe 104 allows the machine to provide an additional mode of operation for training (training mode). When the training mode is enabled, the user can move the ultrasound probe 104 on the patient's body, a medical mannequin, or other arbitrary surface to navigate a pre-recorded patient case. The software loaded on the ultrasound machine 102 will respond to the motion of the ultrasound transducer 114 in a simulated environment in the same manner as when operating the ultrasound machine 102 in traditional mode (standard mode) with the real physics of ultrasound. The added benefit of the training mode is that the ultrasound operator can correlate what is observed in the real patient with a large library of pre-recorded real and simulated ultrasound cases that may exhibit a wide range of known pathologies. Furthermore, pre-recorded real and simulated ultrasound data may be augmented with additional anatomical annotations 140 that provide further insight on the details of how to use ultrasound imaging in the clinical setting. Those anatomical annotations 140 may include the labeling of pathologies or anatomical structures that are visible in the ultrasound data.


Accordingly, the disclosed solution can mitigate human error that arises from misalignment of the transducer's reference indicator 110 thorough manual and automatic misalignment detection.


Manual misalignment detection—The ultrasound operator can validate the appearance of a desired anatomical region with a pre-recorded case and verify that he or she oriented the ultrasound probe 104 correctly when scanning a patient. This approach does not need any additional equipment or modification beyond the disclosed embedded motion sensor.


More specifically, to calibrate the system, the user places the ultrasound probe 104 at a known position with respect to the ultrasound machine 102. This is necessary to track the position of the ultrasound probe 104 with respect to the ultrasound machine 102 without the aid of any additional sensor or technology. The ultrasound machine 102 provides the user with an on-screen visual reference to establish how the sensor should be aligned (for example, with the probe indicator icon 108). AU existing ultrasound machines provide such reference in the form of a small colored circle on the side of the screen. For the disclosed application it may be also useful, but not necessary, to show a visual representation of the patient's body on-screen to provide additional guidance.


The ultrasound operator may then scan the patient's body, a medical mannequin, or other arbitrary surface. The embedded 6-DOF sensor 118 informs the ultrasound machine 102 about the position of the 6-DOF sensor 118 throughout the scanning session.


Software in the ultrasound machine 102 continuously monitors the position and orientation of the ultrasound probe 104 during the scanning session using the readings from the 6-DOF sensor 118. The calibration procedure noted above allows the software to compute the relative position of the 6-DOF sensor 118 with respect to the ultrasound machine 102. If the software detects that the ultrasound probe 104 is not aligned correctly according to established medical conventions, then a visual or audio alert is generated to inform the operator about the hazard.


Automatic misalignment detection—If additional means (as explained below) are available for determining the position of the ultrasound unit with respect to the ultrasound transducer 114, software on the device can determine automatically whether or not the current orientation of the ultrasound transducer 114 is correct by checking if the expected medical conventions are being honored. This solution does not require a separate calibration step, and it may be more accurate over the extent of the scanning session.


More specifically, this approach requires two-point motion sensing solution where a reference beacon 142 is placed at fixed position on the ultrasound machine 102 and the receiver is placed inside the ultrasound probe, preferably as part of the 6-DOF sensor 118. During the ultrasound scanning process, the two-point sensor solution informs the ultrasound machine 102 about the position of the 6-DOF sensor 118 relative to the ultrasound machine 102 throughout the scanning session. Software on the ultrasound machine 102 continuously monitors the position and orientation of the ultrasound probe 104 with respect to the ultrasound machine 102 during the scanning session using the readings from the two-point sensor solution (that is, the reference beacon 142 in conjunction with the 6-DOF sensor 118). If the software detects that the ultrasound probe 104 is not aligned correctly according to established medical conventions, then a visual or audio alert is generated to inform the operator about the hazard.


While the present invention has been described with regards to particular embodiments, it is recognized that additional variations of the present invention may be devised without departing from the inventive concept.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

This invention may be industrially applied to the development, manufacture, and use of ultrasound probes, ultrasound probe systems, and ultrasound probe training systems.

Claims
  • 1. An embedded ultrasound training system, the ultrasound training system having a standard mode and a training mode, the ultrasound training system comprising: (a) an ultrasound machine configured to operate in the standard mode and the training mode;(b) an ultrasound probe operatively connected to the ultrasound machine, the ultrasound probe comprising: (i) a sensing head;(ii) an ultrasound transducer that, when operated, transmits acoustic waves from and measures reflected waves received at the sensing head to produce a reflected wave signal,(iii) ultrasound circuitry, the ultrasound circuitry configured to receive the reflected wave signal from the ultrasound transducer and transmitting an image signal to the ultrasound machine,(iv) an inertial sensor, the inertial sensor configured for measuring a position and an orientation of the ultrasound probe; and(v) a probe housing encasing the ultrasound transducer, the inertial sensor, and a compression sensor; and(c) a library of pre-recorded ultrasound cases connected to the training mode to simulate the functioning of the ultrasound probe as if in the standard mode, wherein when the ultrasound transducer is active in the standard mode, a user can scan a patient through transmitted acoustic waves and reflected waves, and wherein when the ultrasound transducer is inactive in the training mode, the ultrasound probe functions as a motion sensing peripheral in a simulated environment to navigate the library of pre-recorded ultrasound cases, whereby, the position and the orientation of the ultrasound probe are displayed on the ultrasound machine.
  • 2. The ultrasound system of claim 1, where the ultrasound transducer is a piezoelectric element.
  • 3. An ultrasound system, comprising: (a) an ultrasound machine configured for operating in a standard mode and a training mode; and(b) an ultrasound probe operatively connected to the ultrasound machine, the ultrasound probe comprising: (i) an ultrasound transducer configured for transmitting acoustic waves and measuring reflected waves to produce a reflected wave signal,(ii) ultrasound circuitry configured for receiving the reflected wave signal from the ultrasound transducer and configured for transmitting an image signal to the ultrasound machine,(iii) a motion sensor configured for measuring a position and an orientation of the ultrasound probe, and(iv) a probe housing encasing the ultrasound transducer, wherein the ultrasound transducer is configured for scanning a patient in the standard mode, and wherein the ultrasound probe is configured for use as a motion sensing peripheral in the training mode.
  • 4. The ultrasound system of claim 3, further comprising a library of pre-recorded ultrasound cases connected to the training mode to simulate the functioning of the ultrasound probe as if in the standard mode.
  • 5. The ultrasound system of claim 3, wherein the ultrasound probe further includes a reference indicator, the reference indicator comprising a direction indicator to orient the ultrasound probe.
  • 6. The ultrasound system of claim 3, wherein the ultrasound probe further includes a sensing head at which the ultrasound transducer transmits the acoustic waves and measures the reflected waves.
  • 7. The ultrasound system of claim 6, wherein the ultrasound transducer is configured to measure a force on the sensor head.
  • 8. The ultrasound system of claim 7, wherein the ultrasound transducer comprises a piezoelectric element.
  • 9. The ultrasound system of claim 3, wherein the motion sensor is an inertial sensor.
  • 10. The ultrasound system of claim 3, wherein the motion sensor comprises an accelerometer.
  • 11. The ultrasound system of claim 3, wherein the ultrasound probe further comprises a compression sensor that measures a force on the ultrasound probe, and the probe housing encases the compression sensor.
  • 12. The ultrasound system of claim 11, where the compression sensor comprises a resistive strain gauge.
  • 13. A method, comprising the steps of: (a) providing an ultrasound machine configured for operating in a standard mode and providing a training mode; and providing an ultrasound probe operatively connected to the ultrasound machine, the ultrasound probe comprising: (i) an ultrasound transducer configured for transmitting acoustic waves and measuring reflected waves to produce a reflected wave signal,(ii) ultrasound circuitry configured for receiving the reflected wave signal from the ultrasound transducer and configured for transmitting an image signal to the ultrasound machine,(iii) a motion sensor configured for measuring a position and an orientation of the ultrasound probe, and(iv) a probe housing encasing the ultrasound transducer, wherein the ultrasound transducer is configured for scanning a patient in the standard mode, and wherein the ultrasound probe is configured for use as a motion sensing peripheral in the training mode; and(b) using the ultrasound system in the standard mode by: (i) activating the ultrasound transducer,(ii) operating the ultrasound probe to scan the patient, the ultrasound transducer transmitting the acoustic waves and measuring the reflected waves to produce the reflected wave signal,(iii) the ultrasound circuitry receiving the reflected wave signal from the ultrasound transducer and transmitting the image signal to the ultrasound machine, and(iv) the ultrasound machine displaying an ultrasound image.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising using the ultrasound system in the training mode by switching to the training mode from the standard mode, measuring a position and orientation of the ultrasound probe, and employing the ultrasound probe as the motion sensing peripheral to navigate a library of pre-recorded ultrasound cases based on the measured position and orientation of the ultrasound probe.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of using the ultrasound system in the training mode further comprises coordinating a probe indicator icon to the motion sensor such that the probe indicator icon moves in a coordinated fashion to a reference indicator of the ultrasound probe, and the library of pre-recorded ultrasound cases responds to the measured position and orientation of the ultrasound probe.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of coordinating the probe indicator icon in relation to the inertial sensor comprises wirelessly coupling the motion sensor to a reference beacon connected to the ultrasound training system.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, further comprising the steps of: (a) detecting a misalignment between the probe indicator icon and the reference indicator; and(b) providing an alert to a user about the detected misalignment.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the alert is visual.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the alert is auditory.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of using the ultrasound system in the training mode further comprises the step of augmenting the library of pre-recorded ultrasound cases with one or more anatomical annotations before navigating the library of pre-recorded ultrasound cases.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/037,796 filed Jul. 17, 2018 for Embedded Motion Sensing Technology for Integration within Commercial Ultrasound Probes, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/481,725 filed May 25, 2012 for Embedded Motion Sensing Technology for Integration within Commercial Ultrasound Probes, which applications are incorporated in their entirety here by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (269)
Number Name Date Kind
1488233 Diehl Mar 1924 A
1762937 Staud Jun 1930 A
2019121 Rewal Oct 1935 A
2112019 Gyger Mar 1938 A
2127610 Moore Aug 1938 A
2705049 Brooks Mar 1955 A
2705307 Nyswander Mar 1955 A
2722947 Sragal Nov 1955 A
2886316 Ayala May 1959 A
4040171 Cline et al. Aug 1977 A
4838863 Allard et al. Jun 1989 A
4838869 Allard Jun 1989 A
4994034 Botich et al. Feb 1991 A
5231381 Duwaer Jul 1993 A
5513992 Refait May 1996 A
5609485 Bergman Mar 1997 A
5678565 Sarvazyan Oct 1997 A
5689443 Ramanathan Nov 1997 A
5701900 Shehada et al. Dec 1997 A
5704791 Gillio Jan 1998 A
5755577 Gillio May 1998 A
5767839 Rosenberg Jun 1998 A
5776062 Nields Jul 1998 A
5791908 Gillio Aug 1998 A
5800177 Gillio Sep 1998 A
5800178 Gillio Sep 1998 A
5800179 Bailey Sep 1998 A
5800350 Coppleson et al. Sep 1998 A
5827942 Madsen et al. Oct 1998 A
5882206 Gillio Mar 1999 A
5889237 Makinwa Mar 1999 A
5934288 Avila et al. Aug 1999 A
6001472 Ikeda et al. Dec 1999 A
6048312 Ishrak et al. Apr 2000 A
6063030 Vara et al. May 2000 A
6068597 Lin May 2000 A
6074213 Hon Jun 2000 A
6113395 Hon Sep 2000 A
6117078 Lysyansky Sep 2000 A
6122538 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6156213 Dudley et al. Dec 2000 A
6193657 Drapkin Feb 2001 B1
6267599 Bailey Jul 2001 B1
6468212 Scott et al. Oct 2002 B1
6502756 F.ang.hraeus Jan 2003 B1
6511427 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B1
6548768 Pettersson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570104 Ericson et al. May 2003 B1
6654000 Rosenberg Nov 2003 B2
6663008 Pettersson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665554 Charles et al. Dec 2003 B1
6666376 Ericson Dec 2003 B1
6667695 Pettersson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674427 Pettersson et al. Jan 2004 B1
6689966 Wiebe Feb 2004 B2
6693626 Rosenberg Feb 2004 B1
6694163 Vining Feb 2004 B1
6698660 F.ang.hraeus et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714213 Lithicum et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714901 Cotin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719470 Berhin Apr 2004 B2
6722574 Skantze et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732927 Olsson et al. May 2004 B2
6750877 Rosenberg et al. Jun 2004 B2
6780016 Toly Aug 2004 B1
6816148 Mallett et al. Nov 2004 B2
6836555 Ericson et al. Dec 2004 B2
6854821 Ericson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6864880 Hugosson et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878062 Bjorklund et al. Apr 2005 B2
6896650 Tracey et al. May 2005 B2
6916283 Tracey et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927916 Craven-Bartle Aug 2005 B2
6929183 Pettersson Aug 2005 B2
6929481 Alexander et al. Aug 2005 B1
6947033 F.ang.hraeus et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958747 Sahlberg et al. Oct 2005 B2
6966495 Lynggaard et al. Nov 2005 B2
6992655 Ericson et al. Jan 2006 B2
7002559 Ericson Feb 2006 B2
7035429 Andreasson Apr 2006 B2
7037258 Chatenever et al. May 2006 B2
7050653 Edso et al. May 2006 B2
7054487 Ericson et al. May 2006 B2
7072529 Hugosson et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089308 Fransson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094977 Ericson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7110604 Olsson Sep 2006 B2
7120320 Petterson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7121465 Rignell Oct 2006 B2
7127682 Sandstrom et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143952 Ericson Dec 2006 B2
7145556 Pettersson Dec 2006 B2
7154056 Bergqvist et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162087 Bryborn Jan 2007 B2
7167164 Ericson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7172131 Pettersson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175095 Pettersson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176896 Fahraeus et al. Feb 2007 B1
7180509 Fermgard et al. Feb 2007 B2
7195166 Olsson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202861 Lynggaard Apr 2007 B2
7202963 Wiebe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7239306 Fahraeus et al. Jul 2007 B2
7246321 Bryborn et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248250 Pettersson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249256 Hansen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249716 Bryborn Jul 2007 B2
7254839 Fahraeus et al. Aug 2007 B2
7278017 Skantze Oct 2007 B2
7281668 Pettersson et al. Oct 2007 B2
7283676 Olsson Oct 2007 B2
7293697 Wiebe et al. Nov 2007 B2
7295193 Fahraeus Nov 2007 B2
7296075 Lynggaard Nov 2007 B2
7321692 Bryborn et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333947 Wiebe et al. Feb 2008 B2
7345673 Ericson et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353393 Hansen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7356012 Wiebe et al. Apr 2008 B2
7371068 Lloyd et al. May 2008 B2
7382361 Burstrom et al. Jun 2008 B2
7385595 Bryborn et al. Jun 2008 B2
7408536 Hugosson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7415501 Burstrom Aug 2008 B2
7418160 Lynggaard Aug 2008 B2
7422154 Ericson Sep 2008 B2
7441183 Burstrom et al. Oct 2008 B2
7457413 Thuvesholmen et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457476 Olsson Nov 2008 B2
7543753 Pettersson Jun 2009 B2
7588191 Pettersson et al. Sep 2009 B2
7600693 Pettersson Oct 2009 B2
7649637 Wiebe et al. Jan 2010 B2
7670070 Craven-Bartle Mar 2010 B2
7672513 Bjorklund et al. Mar 2010 B2
7701446 Sahlberg et al. Apr 2010 B2
7710408 Ericson May 2010 B2
7751089 Fahraeus et al. Jul 2010 B2
7753283 Lynggaard Jul 2010 B2
7777777 Bowman et al. Aug 2010 B2
7788315 Johansson Aug 2010 B2
7794388 Draxinger et al. Sep 2010 B2
7806696 Alexander et al. Oct 2010 B2
7833018 Alexander et al. Nov 2010 B2
7850454 Toly Dec 2010 B2
7857626 Toly Dec 2010 B2
7871850 Park Jan 2011 B2
7931470 Alexander et al. Apr 2011 B2
8244506 Butsev et al. Aug 2012 B2
8294972 Chung Oct 2012 B2
8428326 Falk et al. Apr 2013 B2
8480404 Savitsky Jul 2013 B2
8480406 Alexander et al. Jul 2013 B2
8556635 Toly Oct 2013 B2
8721344 Marmaropoulos et al. May 2014 B2
9128116 Welch et al. Sep 2015 B2
9251721 Lampotang Feb 2016 B2
9436993 Stolka et al. Sep 2016 B1
9870721 Savitsky et al. Jan 2018 B2
9911365 Siassi Mar 2018 B2
10052010 Feddema Aug 2018 B2
10132015 Woodruff et al. Nov 2018 B2
11011077 Garcia Kilroy May 2021 B2
20010031920 Kaufman et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020076581 McCoy Jun 2002 A1
20020076681 Leight et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020088926 Prasser Jul 2002 A1
20020099310 Kimchy et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020168618 Anderson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173721 Grunwald et al. Nov 2002 A1
20040043368 Hsieh et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040087850 Okerlund et al. May 2004 A1
20050119569 Ohtake Jun 2005 A1
20050181342 Toly Aug 2005 A1
20050214726 Feygin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228617 Kerwin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050283075 Ma et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060020204 Serra et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060098010 Dwyer et al. May 2006 A1
20070088213 Poland Apr 2007 A1
20070161904 Urbano Jul 2007 A1
20070232907 Pelissier et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070236514 Agusanto Oct 2007 A1
20070238085 Colvin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080009743 Hayasaka Jan 2008 A1
20080137071 Chow Jun 2008 A1
20080187896 Savitsky Aug 2008 A1
20080200807 Wright et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204004 Anderson Aug 2008 A1
20080269606 Matsumura Oct 2008 A1
20080294096 Uber et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080312884 Hostettler et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006419 Savitsky Jan 2009 A1
20090043195 Poland Feb 2009 A1
20090046912 Hostettler Feb 2009 A1
20090124906 Caluser May 2009 A1
20090130642 Tada et al. May 2009 A1
20090209859 Tsujita et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090266957 Cermak Oct 2009 A1
20090305213 Burgkart et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311655 Karkanias et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100055657 Goble et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100104162 Falk et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100179428 Pedersen Jul 2010 A1
20100268067 Razzaque et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100277422 Muresianu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110010023 Kunzig et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110306025 Sheehan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120021993 Kim et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120058457 Savitsky Mar 2012 A1
20120143142 Klein Jun 2012 A1
20120150797 Landy et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179039 Pelissier et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120200977 Nestler Aug 2012 A1
20120219937 Hughes et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120237102 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120237913 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238875 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120251991 Savitsky et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130046523 Van Dinther Feb 2013 A1
20130064036 Lee et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130065211 Amso et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130137989 Chen May 2013 A1
20130158411 Miyasaka Jun 2013 A1
20130179306 Want et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130236872 Laurusonis et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140087347 Tracy Mar 2014 A1
20140114194 Kanayama et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140119645 Zimet May 2014 A1
20140120505 Rios et al. May 2014 A1
20140170620 Savitsky et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140228685 Eelbode Aug 2014 A1
20140272878 Shim et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150056591 Tepper et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150078639 Hausotte Mar 2015 A1
20150084897 Nataneli et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150086956 Savitsky et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150140538 Savitsky et al. May 2015 A1
20150154890 Savitsky et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150213731 Sato Jul 2015 A1
20160104393 Savitsky et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160259424 Nataneli et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160314715 Savitsky et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160314716 Grubbs Oct 2016 A1
20160328998 Pedersen et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170018204 Savitsky et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170028141 Fiedler et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170035517 Geri Feb 2017 A1
20170046985 Hendrickson et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170110032 O'Brien Apr 2017 A1
20170270829 Bauss Sep 2017 A1
20170352294 Nataneli et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180137784 Savitsky et al. May 2018 A1
20180197441 Rios Jul 2018 A1
20180211563 Savitsky et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180330635 Savitsky et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180366034 Casals Gelpi Dec 2018 A1
20190057620 Eggert Feb 2019 A1
20190231436 Panse Aug 2019 A1
20190321657 Hale Oct 2019 A1
20190371204 Savitsky et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200126449 Horst Apr 2020 A1
20200138518 Lang May 2020 A1
20200242971 Wang et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200242972 Petrinec et al. Jul 2020 A1
20210128125 Sitti et al. May 2021 A1
20210134186 Savitsky et al. May 2021 A1
20210186311 Levy et al. Jun 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
1103223 May 2001 EP
2801966 Nov 2014 EP
2127610 Mar 1999 RU
1994040171 Nov 2014 RU
2006060406 Jun 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
Chung, Gregory, “Effects of Simulation-Based Practice on Focused Assessment . . . ”, Military Medicine, Oct. 2013, vol. 178.
Aligned Management Associates, Inc., Corporate home page describing organizing committee, overview, Procedicus MIST[trademark]-suturing module 30.0, 6 pgs., obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
American Academy of Emergency Medicine, conference: 11th annual scientific assembly preconference ultrasound courts, http://www. aaem.org/education/scientificassembly/sa05/precon/ultrasound.shtml, 6 pgs, obtained from website Feb. 16, 2005.
Barbosa, J. et al., “Computer education in emergency medicine residency programs,” http://www.med-ed-online.org/res00002.htm, 8 pgs, obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
Brannam, Let al, “Emergency nurses utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients,” Acad Emerg Med, 11(12):1361-1363, Dec. 2004.
Calvert, N. et al., “The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review and economic evaluation/executive summary,” Health Tech Assess 2003, 7(12), 4 pgs.
Center for Human Simulation, corporate home page describing overview/people, http://www.uchsc.edu, 7 pgs, obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
CIMIT News, “The medical access program: new CIMIT initiative to benefit underserved patients/partners telemedicine and CIMIT launch new initiative: stay connected, be healthy/highlights: operating room of the future plug-and-play project,” http://www.cimit.org, Jan. 2005; Vol. (2), 2 pgs., obtained from website Mar. 1, 2005.
Colt, H. G. et al., “Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training,” Chest 2001; 120:1333-1339.
Computer Motion, “About computer motion: technology to enhance surgeons capabilities, improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs/corporate alliances/products solutions for surgical innovation/training on the da Vinci[registered] surgical system-introduction,” 2002 Computer Motion, http://www.computermotion.com, 6 pgs.
Delp, Setal, “Surgical simulation—an emerging technology for training in emergency medicine,” Presence, 6(2):147-159, Apr. 1997 (abstract).
Dorner, R. et. al., “Synergies between interactive training simulations and digital storytelling: a component-based framework,” Computer Graphics, 26(1):45-55, Feb. 2002 (abstract).
Duque, D. and Kessler S., “Ultrasound guided vascular access,” Amer Coli Emerg Phy., http://www.nyacep.org/education/articles/ultrasound%20vascular%20access.htm, 2 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Espinet, A. and Dunning J., “Does ultrasound-guided central line insertion reduce complications and time to placement in elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery,” Inter Cardiovascular Thoracic Surg, 3:523-527, 2004; http:/licvts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/3/3/523, 6 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005 (abstract).
Gallagher, A. G. et al., “Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterization laboratory,” Lancet, 364:1538-1540, Oct. 23, 2004.
Gallagher, A. G. et al., “Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures,” AM Coli Surg, 197(3):479-488, Sep. 2003.
Gausche, M. et. al., “Effect on out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial,” JAMA, 283(6):783-790, Feb. 9, 2000.
Gore, D. C. and Gregory, S. R., “Historical perspective on medical errors: Richard Cabot and the Institute of Medicine,” J Amer Coli Surg, 197(4), 5 pgs, Oct. 2003.
Grantcharov, T. P. et. al., “Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training,” Br J Surg, 91(2):146-150, Feb. 1, 2004 (abstract).
Grantcharov, T. P. et al., “Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills,” Am J Surg, 185(2):146-149, Feb. 1, 2004 (abstract).
Haluck, R. S., et al., “Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality A survey of program directors in general surgery,” Arch Surg, 135(7):786-792, Jul. 1, 2000.
Helmreich, R. L., “On error management: lessons from aviation,” BMJ, 320:781-785, Mar. 2000.
Huckman, R. S. and Pisano, G. P., “Turf battles in coronary revascularization,” N Engl J Med, http://www.nejm.org, 4 pgs, 352(9):857-859, Mar. 3, 2005.
Immersion Corporation, URL: http://www.immersion.com/corporate/products/, corporate home page describing Immersions surgical training simulators—“Wireless Data Glove: The CyberGiove[registered]II System,” 5 pgs, obtained from the website Nov. 17, 2005 and Jan. 24, 2008.
injuryboard.com, “Reducing complications associated with central vein catheterization,” URSL: http://www.injuryboard.com/view.cfm/Article=668, 5 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Intersense, home page listing motion tracking products, http://www.isense.com/prodcuts.aspxid=42 , 1 pg, obtained from website Jan. 24, 2008.
Jemmett, M. E., et al., “Unrecognized misplacement of endotracheal tubes in a mixed urban to rural emergency medical services setting,” Acad Emerg Med, 10(9):961-964, Sep. 2003.
Katz, S. H. and Falk, J. L., “Misplaced endotrachial tubes by paramedics in an urban medical services system,” Annals Emerg Med, 37:32-37, Jan. 2001.
Lewis, R., “Educational research: time to reach the bar, not lower it,” Acad Emerg Med, 12(3):247-248, Mar. 2005.
Liu, A. et, al., “A survey of surgical simulation: applications, technology, and education,” Presence, 12(6):1-45, Dec. 2003.
Manchester Visulations Centre, “Webset project-bringing 3D medical training tools to the WWW,” http://www.sve.man.ac.uklmvc/research/previous/website, 3 pgs, obtained from the website Sep. 8, 2004.
McLellan, H., “Virtual realities,” Mclellan Wyatt Digital, 33 pgs.
Medical Simulation Corporation, corporate home page describing management team/frequently asked questions, http://www.medsimulation.com/about_msc/key_employees.asp, 7 pgs, obtained from website Nov. 25, 2004.
Medtronic, “The StealthStation[registered] treatment guidance system,” the corporate home page describing the company fact sheet and profile; http://www.medtronic.com/Newsroom, 4 pgs, obtained from website Mar. 5, 2005.
Mort, T. C., “Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts,” Anesth Analg, 99(2):607-613, Aug. 2004, 1 pg, obtained from website Sep. 8, 2004 (abstract).
Nazeer, S. R., et al., “Ultrasound-assisted paracentesis performed by emergency physicians v.s. the traditional technique: a prospective, randomized study,” Amer J of Emer Med, 23:363-367, 2005.
NCA Medical Simulation Center, Tutorial-simulation for medical training, http://Simcen.usuhs.millmiccaie, 4 pgs, 2003.
Next Dimension Imaging, “Products-Anatomy Analyzer 2,” http://www.nexted.com/anatomyanalyzer.asp, 2 pgs, obtained from website Dec. 7, 2004.
Norris, T. E. et al., “Teaching procedural skills,” J General Internal Med, 12(S2):S64-S70, Apr. 1997.
On the Net Resources—Education and Training, URL: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge_base/education.html, corporate home page regarding internet sites regarding education and training, 16 pgs, obtained from website Jan. 8, 2005.
Osberg, K. M., “Virtual reality and education: a look at both sides of the sword,” http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-93-7/, 19 pgs, Dec. 14, 1992, obtained from website Jan. 21, 2008.
Osmon, S. et al., “Clinical investigations: reporting of medical errors: an intensive care unit experience,” Grit Care Med, 32(3), 13 pgs, Mar. 2004.
Ponder, M., et al., “Immersive VR decision training: telling interactive stories featuring advanced human simulation technologies,” Eurographics Association 2003, 10 pgs.
Primal, corporate home page describing resources for teaching healthcare practitioners, 2 pgs, obtained from website.
Prystowsky, J. B. et al., “A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement,” Am J Surg 1999; 177(2): 171-175 (abstract).
Reachin, “Medical Training Development Centre/Reachin technologies AB has entered into a corporation with Mentice AB,” Jan. 20, 2004, 4 pgs, obtained from website Nov. 9, 2004.
Rothschild, J. M., “Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization,” NCBI, Nat Lib Med, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/, HSTAT 21, 6 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Rowe, R. and Cohen, R. A., “An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator,” Anesth Analg 2002, 95:62-66,.
Sensable Technologies, “PHANTOM Omni Haptic Device,” 2 pgs, http://www.sensable.com/haptic-ohantom-omni.htm., obtained from website Jan. 24, 2008.
Shaffer, K., “Becoming a physician: teaching anatomy in a digital age,” NEJM, Sep. 23, 2004; 351(13):1279-81 (extract of first 100 words—no abstract).
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16037796 Jul 2018 US
Child 17374795 US
Parent 13481725 May 2012 US
Child 16037796 US