Embodiments herein generally relate to security printing and more particularly to systems, devices, and methods that print gloss marks and infrared marks that overlap one another within a uniform region.
In the area of security printing, documents are protected from copying, forging and counterfeiting using multiple techniques. Some methods of security printing use standard materials such as papers inks and toners; however, more typically security printing requires special and expensive materials. Example documents needing security printing include legal documents, negotiable documents, prescriptions, etc., where a user would like to be able to have a high level of confidence that the document is genuine.
Some printing techniques enable printing small overt security features that could not easily be copied by a digital copier, if at all. However documents protected with such features can potentially be reproduced with reverse engineering.
An exemplary method controls a marking engine using a processor to print a uniform region having a visually uniform color for a normal observer within all areas of the uniform region on printing media. The method also controls the marking engine (using the processor) to print different gloss patterns within the uniform region. The different gloss patterns have first (e.g., relatively higher ink-pile level) gloss regions and second (e.g., relatively lower ink-pile level) gloss regions. The gloss is created off the sides between the regions, and the regions can have similar gloss. The gloss level difference at the boundaries between the first and second gloss regions forms “gloss marks” which can be numbers, characters, images, structures, glyphs, etc. The method further controls the marking engine (using the processor) to print different infrared patterns within the uniform region to form “infrared marks” which can also be numbers, characters, images, structures, etc.
The method can further control the marking engine (using the processor) to print a plurality of the uniform regions. In such cases, the gloss marks and the infrared marks are positioned to cross the uniform regions.
In some embodiments, the infrared patterns are positioned only within the first (high-ink-pile level) gloss regions and are not positioned within the second (low-ink-pile level) gloss regions. Thus, the gloss marks and the infrared marks overlap one another within the uniform region. The gloss marks are only observable at a non-perpendicular angle to the printed media that reflects different gloss levels differently (as shown in
A printing apparatus embodiment herein includes a processor, a media path operatively (directly or indirectly) connected to the processor, a media storage unit at one end of the media path, and a marking engine positioned along the media path to receive printing media from the media storage. The marking engine prints marks on the printing media to produce printed media. Further, an output unit is at a second end of the media path. The output unit outputs the printed media.
The processor controls the marking engine to print a uniform region having the visually uniform color for an observer within all areas of the uniform region. The processor also controls the marking engine to print different gloss patterns within the uniform region. The different gloss patterns have first and second gloss regions, and the gloss difference at the boundaries between the first and second gloss regions forms gloss marks. Additionally, the processor controls the marking engine to print different infrared patterns within the uniform region to form infrared marks. In some embodiments, the infrared patterns are only within the first gloss regions and are not within the second gloss regions.
These and other features are described in, or are apparent from, the following detailed description.
Various exemplary embodiments of the systems and methods are described in detail below, with reference to the attached drawing figures, in which:
As mentioned above, some printing techniques enable printing small overt security features that are not easily copied by a digital copier. To provide security without using specialized and expensive equipment and toners, devices and methods herein utilize small overt security features within multiple gloss levels and infrared marks (e.g., watermarks). This accomplishes security, with a minimum of three-different combinations of gloss and infrared marks, so that the infrared watermark is a subset of the gloss level watermark. While gloss level can be viewed without a special tool, the infrared signal requires a special tool such as an infrared camera to verify. The infrared embedded gloss level appears the same as the non-infrared version without the infrared camera.
Markings made using gloss level differentiation (sometimes referred to herein as gloss level markings) is a security technique that does not require a special tool to view, and is an especially strong anti-copying technique. Gloss level markings use a pair of colors that appear to be about the same CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow, black) color when viewing straight on (perpendicular to the page) but show a differential gloss when tilting due to the pile height of the toner or ink. One example would be Clow=K and Chigh=CMYK where high and low indicate gloss pile height and gloss level.
Note that in
To add another level of protection to the security printing, the devices and methods herein provide a two level anti-copying/anti-fraud feature by embedding infrared watermarks within the gloss level markings. The first level provides human-readable gloss level markings of text or other designs to show content on the page that cannot be copied with digital copiers and scanners. At the second level, infrared marks are embedded in all or a part of the gloss level markings. This provides a covert message that forgers could miss when they presume that all they need to do is to defeat the overt gloss level anti-copying feature. Effectively, the infrared watermark signal is disguised as a visible gloss level feature to divert the attention of a forger who would otherwise look for ways to defeat the infrared mark if that was a clearly noticeable security feature.
In the gloss level marking process, two different colorant quadruplets can have a constant or almost constant “black” color, but have different gloss levels. In essence, the gloss level marking process alternates between k-black and rich-black, for example between (0,0,0,255) and (255,255,255,255). This is a simplified view ignoring, for example, ink limits of a certain device. One component of gloss level markings is fine detail behavior. In order to get a good differential gloss, the gloss level markings use small character structures. Small structures loosen the requirement on color matching, because fine detail color changes are much harder to see than fine detail luminance changes. With this additional input, the gloss level markings use a second quadruplet pair of (0,0,0,205) & (255,255,255,205).
In order to get an infrared signature, the devices and methods herein alternate between the two different quadruplet pairs. The infrared contrast can actually be very low (20% in one numerical example, but roughly 10%-20% in actual prints), but that it is still easily viewable with standard infrared cameras.
As shown in
Besides embedding the infrared information via the Chigh-light and Chigh-dark pair, the infrared printing can also be embedded with another pair of pixels Clow-light and Clow-dark creating a color quadruplet to embed the gloss level and infrared via a cross combination of color pairs. While using the low color quadruplet pair (Clow-dark and Clow-light), this produces a better infrared print and gloss level; however, when using such a low color quadruplet pair, the colors are no longer the same viewed straight on. Therefore, in applications where hiding the gloss level markings is less important, the low color quadruplet pair are used, which provides a better infrared print. Where hiding the gloss level markings is more important, the high color quadruplet pair is used.
As mentioned above, the gloss marks are only observable at a non-perpendicular angle to the printed media that reflects different gloss levels differently. As shown in
Thus, as shown in greater detail below, the devices and methods herein provide an approach to make current covert gloss level more difficult to copy, reverse engineer or reproduce via digital machines by using the gloss level markings as a “decoy” to embed an infrared watermark within the gloss level markings.
While printing in item 170, as shown by item 172, the method controls the marking engine (again using the processor) to print different gloss patterns within the uniform region. Any conventionally known method of printing gloss patterns (such as those disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication 2010/0128321, relevant portions relating to gloss patterning techniques of which are incorporated herein by reference) or any gloss patterning methods developed in the future can be used with embodiments herein. The different gloss patterns have first (e.g., relatively higher (or lower)) gloss regions and second (e.g., relatively lower (or higher)) gloss regions (based, for example, on the height of the toner or ink printed). In other words, the first gloss regions have the same CMYK color, but have a different gloss level (either higher or lower) when compared to the second gloss regions.
Thus, the first and second gloss regions appear about the same when viewed perpendicular (at 0°) to the printed media, but show a differential gloss when tilting (viewed at a non-perpendicular angle to the printed media) due to the pile height of the toner or ink. The gloss difference at the boundaries between the first and second gloss regions produced by item 172 forms “gloss marks” that can only be observed when viewing at a non-perpendicular angle to the printed media. The gloss marks can be numbers, characters, images, structures, etc.
While printing in item 170, as shown by item 174, the method controls the marking engine (using the processor) to print different infrared patterns within the uniform region to form “infrared marks.” The method can then output the printed media as shown by item 176. Again, any infrared printing method, whether currently known or developed in the future, can be used with embodiments herein. The infrared marks can be numbers, characters, images, structures, etc.
In item 170, the method can further control the marking engine (using the processor) to print a plurality of the uniform regions on a given printing area (e.g., a sheet of print media). In such cases, the gloss marks and the infrared marks can be positioned to continue across the uniform regions.
In some embodiments, the infrared patterns can be positioned only within the first (high) gloss regions and are not positioned within the second (low) gloss regions of the gloss marks. This embodiment therefore essentially uses three types pixels of the same CMYK color (color triplets) to cause the underlying gloss mark pattern to appear within the infrared marks (see
By using three such distinct gloss/infrared characteristics for the pixels, the infrared marks form larger characters, structures, or pictures that are patterned by the underlying gloss marks. This is shown most clearly in
Thus, as shown above, the gloss marks and the infrared marks overlap one another within the uniform region and the infrared watermark is a subset of the gloss level watermark. The gloss marks are only observable at a non-perpendicular angle to the printed media that reflects different gloss levels differently, and the infrared marks are only observable within the infrared spectrum of electromagnetic radiation.
The input/output device 226 is used for communications to and from the computerized device 200. The processor 224 controls the various actions of the computerized device. A non-transitory (non-volatile) computer storage medium device 220 (which can be optical, magnetic, capacitor based, etc.) is readable by the processor 224 and stores instructions that the processor 224 executes to allow the computerized device to perform its various functions, such as those described herein. Thus, as shown in
In either type of device, the processor 224 controls the marking engine 210 to print a uniform region having the visually uniform color for an observer within all areas of the uniform region. The processor 224 also controls the marking engine 210 to print different gloss patterns within the uniform region. The different gloss patterns have first and second gloss regions, and the gloss difference at the boundaries between the first and second gloss regions forms gloss marks. Additionally, the processor 224 controls the marking engine 210 to print different infrared patterns within the uniform region to form infrared marks. In some embodiments, the infrared patterns are only within the first gloss regions and are not within the second gloss regions.
Many computerized devices are discussed above. Computerized devices that include chip-based central processing units (CPU's), input/output devices (including graphic user interfaces (GUI), memories, comparators, processors, etc. are well-known and readily available devices produced by manufacturers such as Dell Computers, Round Rock Tex., USA and Apple Computer Co., Cupertino Calif., USA. Such computerized devices commonly include input/output devices, power supplies, processors, electronic storage memories, wiring, etc., the details of which are omitted herefrom to allow the reader to focus on the salient aspects of the embodiments described herein. Similarly, scanners and other similar peripheral equipment are available from Xerox Corporation, Norwalk, Conn., USA and the details of such devices are not discussed herein for purposes of brevity and reader focus.
The terms printer or printing device as used herein encompasses any apparatus, such as a digital copier, bookmaking machine, facsimile machine, multi-function machine, etc., which performs a print outputting function for any purpose. The details of printers, printing engines, etc., are well-known by those ordinarily skilled in the art. The embodiments herein can encompass embodiments that print in color, monochrome, or handle color or monochrome image data. All foregoing embodiments are specifically applicable to electrostatographic and/or xerographic machines and/or processes.
In addition, terms such as “right”, “left”, “vertical”, “horizontal”, “top”, “bottom”, “upper”, “lower”, “under”, “below”, “underlying”, “over”, “overlying”, “parallel”, “perpendicular”, etc., used herein are understood to be relative locations as they are oriented and illustrated in the drawings (unless otherwise indicated). Terms such as “touching”, “on”, “in direct contact”, “abutting”, “directly adjacent to”, etc., mean that at least one element physically contacts another element (without other elements separating the described elements). Further, the terms automated or automatically mean that once a process is started (by a machine or a user), one or more machines perform the process without further input from any user.
It will be appreciated that the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims. Unless specifically defined in a specific claim itself, steps or components of the embodiments herein cannot be implied or imported from any above example as limitations to any particular order, number, position, size, shape, angle, color, or material.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6032004 | Mirabella, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
7639400 | Hains | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7852515 | Eschbach et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7894103 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8064100 | Braun et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8064102 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8111432 | Eschbach et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8482802 | Tai et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20080302263 | Eschbach et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305444 | Eschbach et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100128321 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100231980 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140085392 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |