Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claims is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 C.F.C. § 1.57.
This invention relates to ventilation systems, more particularly to roof ventilation systems that help to protect buildings against fires.
Ventilation of a building has numerous benefits for both the building and its occupants. For example, ventilation of an attic space can prevent the attic's temperature from rising to undesirable levels, which also reduces the cost of cooling the interior living space of the building. In addition, increased ventilation in an attic space tends to reduce the humidity within the attic, which can prolong the life of lumber used in the building's framing and elsewhere by diminishing the incidence of mold and dry-rot. Moreover, ventilation promotes a more healthful environment for residents of the building by encouraging the introduction of fresh, outside air. Also, building codes and local ordinances typically require ventilation and dictate the amount of required ventilation. Most jurisdictions require a certain amount of “net free ventilating area,” which is a well-known and widely used measure of ventilation.
An important type of ventilation is Above Sheathing Ventilation (“ASV”), which is ventilation of an area within a roof above the sheathing on a roof deck, such as in a batten cavity between the top of the roof deck and the underside of the tiles. Increasing ASV has the beneficial effect of cooling the batten cavity and reducing the amount of radiant heat that can transfer into the structure of the building, such as an attic space. By reducing the transfer of radiant heat into the building, the structure can stay cooler and require less energy for cooling (e.g., via air conditioners).
In many areas, buildings are at risk of exposure to wildfires. Wildfires can generate firebrands, or burning embers, as a byproduct of the combustion of materials in a wildfire. These embers can travel, airborne, up to one mile or more from the initial location of the wildfire, which increases the severity and scope of the wildfire. One way wildfires can damage buildings is when embers from the fire land either on or near a building. Likewise, burning structures produce embers, which can also travel along air currents to locations removed from the burning structures and pose hazards similar to embers from wildfires. Embers can ignite surrounding vegetation and/or building materials that are not fire-resistant. Additionally, embers can enter the building through foundation vents, under-eave vents, soffit vents, gable end vents, and dormer or other types of traditional roof field vents. Embers that enter the structure can encounter combustible materials and set fire to the building. Fires also generate flames, which can likewise set fire to or otherwise damage buildings when they enter the building's interior through vents.
A system is needed that provides adequate ventilation but protects the building against the ingress of flames, embers, ash, or other harmful floating materials. Desirably, the ventilation system should protect against the ingress of flames and/or embers while still meeting net free ventilation requirements.
The presently disclosed embodiments seek to address the issues discussed above by providing a roof vent that impedes the entry of flames and embers or other floating burning materials while still permitting sufficient air flow to adequately ventilate a building. In preferred embodiments, a roof vent includes an ember and/or flame impedance structure that substantially prevents the ingress of flames and floating embers through the vent. Embers can be as small as 3-4 mm in size. In preferred embodiments, such embers become trapped within the ember and/or flame impedance structure and extinguish naturally therein, without entering the building. In one aspect, the ember and/or flame impedance structure includes a baffle member. This structure also impedes flames inasmuch as the flames would have to traverse a circuitous route to pass through the baffle member. In another aspect, the ember impedance structure includes a fire-resistant fibrous interwoven material. In still another aspect, flame impedance is enhanced through a low profile vent design, which flames tend to pass over, in contrast to a high profile vent design (such as a dormer vent), which presents a natural entry point for flames.
Several configurations of baffle members are described. In some configurations, air flow from one side of the baffle member to the other must traverse a flow path including at least one turn of greater than 90 degrees. In addition, or as an alternative to such configurations, some configurations of baffle members provide a flow path including at least one passage having a width less than or approximately equal to 2.0 cm. The passage may have a length greater than or approximately equal to 0.9 cm.
In some embodiments, the vent system includes first and second vent members, with the first vent member permitting air flow through a hole or opening in a roof deck, and the second vent member taking the place of one or more roof cover elements (e.g., roof tiles adjacent the second vent member). The first and second vent members can be laterally displaced with respect to one another, such that flames and embers entering through the second vent member would have to traverse a flow path along the roof deck before encountering the first vent member. A fire resistant underlayment can also be provided overlying the roof deck to protect the roof deck from embers and flames. Further, supporting members, such as battens, creating an air permeable gap between the roof deck and the roof cover elements can be formed of a fire resistant material. In some embodiments, a third vent member can permit additional flow through a different hole in the roof deck, the third vent member optionally being substantially identical to the first vent member.
In other embodiments, first and second vent members can be joined to form an integrated one-piece vent. The one-piece vent may include a baffle member that prevents the ingress of flames and embers into the building. Alternately, the one-piece vent can include a fire-resistant mesh material that substantially prevents the ingress of floating embers through the vent. Such one-piece systems may be of particular use in so-called composition roofs formed of composite roof materials.
In accordance with one embodiment, a roof field vent is provided. The vent includes a first vent member comprising a first opening that permits air flow between a region below the roof and a region above the first vent member. The vent further includes a second vent member adapted to be in fluid communication with the region above the first vent member. The second vent member includes a second opening permitting air flow between regions above and below the second vent member. At least one of the first and second openings includes a baffle member, the baffle member substantially preventing the ingress of floating embers and/or flames, the baffle member configured to be oriented substantially parallel to a roof field when the vent is installed in the roof field.
In accordance with another embodiment, a roof field vent is provided. The vent includes a first vent member comprising a first opening that permits air flow between a region below the roof and a region above the first vent member. The vent further includes a second vent member adapted to be in fluid communication with the region above the first vent member. The second vent member includes a second opening permitting air flow between regions above and below the second vent member. The vent further includes an ember and/or flame impedance structure connected to one of the first and second vent members so that air flowing through one of the first and second openings flows through the ember and/or flame impedance structure. The ember and/or flame impedance structure includes an elongated upper baffle member comprising a top portion and at least one downwardly extending edge portion connected to the top portion, the top portion and the at least one downwardly extending edge portion being substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the upper baffle member. The ember and/or flame impedance structure further includes an elongated lower baffle member comprising a bottom portion and at least one upwardly extending edge portion connected to the bottom portion, the bottom portion and the at least one upwardly extending edge portion being substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the lower baffle member. The longitudinal axes of the upper and lower baffle members are substantially parallel to one another, and the edge portions of the upper and lower baffle members overlap to form a narrow passage therebetween, such that at least some of the air that flows through the ember and/or flame impedance structure traverses a circuitous path partially formed by the narrow passage.
In accordance with another embodiment, a roof segment is provided. The segment includes a portion of a roof deck comprising at least one roof deck opening. The segment further includes a first vent member installed in the roof deck at the roof deck opening, the first vent member including a first opening that permits air flow through the roof deck opening between a region below the roof and a region above the first vent member. The segment further includes a layer of roof cover elements positioned above the roof deck and engaging one another in a repeating pattern. The segment further includes a second vent member in fluid communication with the region above the first vent member, the second vent member including a second opening permitting air flow between regions above and below the second vent member, wherein the second vent member is positioned substantially within the layer of roof cover elements. At least one of the first and second openings includes a baffle member, the baffle member substantially preventing the ingress of floating embers and/or flames, the baffle member being oriented substantially parallel to the roof deck.
In accordance with another aspect, a roof vent is provided. The roof vent comprises a first vent member comprising a first opening that permits air flow between a region below a roof and a region above the first vent member. The roof vent also comprises a second vent member adapted to be in fluid communication with the region above the first vent member. The second vent member comprises a second opening permitting air flow between regions above and below the second vent member. At least one of the first and second vent members includes a fire-resistant mesh material that substantially prevents the ingress of floating embers through the first opening or the second opening.
In accordance with another aspect, a roof vent is provided, comprising first and second vent members. The first vent member comprises a first opening that permits air flow between a region below a roof and a region above the first vent member. The second vent member is adapted to be in fluid communication with the region above the first vent member. The second vent member comprises a second opening permitting air flow between regions above and below the second vent member. At least one of the first and second vent members includes an ember and/or flame impedance structure that substantially prevents the ingress of floating embers through the opening of the vent member.
All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular embodiment(s) disclosed.
The appended drawings are schematic, not necessarily drawn to scale, and are meant to illustrate and not to limit embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 4A1 is a cross sectional view of one embodiment of baffle members for use in a roof ventilation system.
FIG. 4A2 is a schematic perspective view of a section of the baffle members shown in FIG. 4A1.
FIG. 4A3 is a detail of the cross sectional view shown in FIG. 4A1.
The first vent member 100 can rest upon a roof deck 50. In some embodiments, a protective layer 40, such as a fire resistant underlayment, can overlie the roof deck 50. Thus, the protective layer 40 can be interposed between the roof deck 50 and the first vent member 100, as shown in
In some embodiments, battens 30 (see
The first vent member 100 includes a base 130 with an opening 110 (see
The second vent member 200 also includes openings 210 permitting air flow between a region below the body 205 of the second vent member 200 (e.g., the air permeable gap 32) and a region above the second vent member 200. The openings 210 include one or more baffle members 220 that substantially prevent embers or flames from passing through the opening 210. The baffle members 220 can be configured in a similar fashion to the baffle members 120 in the first vent member 100. Further, in some embodiments, baffle members are included in only one of the openings 110, 210 because in some arrangements, one set of baffle members can be a sufficient safeguard against the intrusion of embers or flames.
Providing baffle members in the openings 110, 210 can have the effect of reducing the flow rate of air through the openings 110, 210. The goal of preventing the ingress of embers or flames into the building should be balanced against the goal of providing adequate ventilation. One way of striking this balance is to provide baffle members in only one of the openings 110, 210. In some arrangements in which baffle members are present in only one of the openings 110, 210, the first vent member 100 can be laterally displaced with respect to the second vent member 200, such as by positioning the first vent member 100 upslope or downslope from the second vent member 200 (See
Because the baffle members 120, 220 can constitute a flow restriction, the first and second vent members 100, 200 may need to be rebalanced to account for the modified flow characteristics. For example, in one arrangement, the first vent member 100 includes baffle members 120 but the second vent member 200 is free of baffles to permit additional air flow through the second vent member 200. Because the second vent member 200 may permit greater air flow than the first vent member 100 in such embodiments, an additional first vent member 100 may be positioned at a further opening in the roof deck 50. The additional first vent member 100 may also include one or more baffle members 120. The second vent member 200 may fluidly communicate with both of the first vent members 100, such as by receiving air that reached the second vent member 200 from both of the first vent members 100 via the air permeable gap 32 in an “open system,” as discussed below with respect to
In some embodiments, the first vent member 100 shown in
FIGS. 4A1-4D show cross sections of several exemplary baffle members 120. Although the baffle members in FIGS. 4A1-4D are labeled as baffle members 120 for convenience, the baffle members in FIGS. 4A1-4D can be used in vent systems 10 as baffle members 120 and/or baffle members 220 (i.e., the illustrated baffle members can be provided in the first vent member 100, the second vent member 200, or both). Further, the arrows shown in FIGS. 4A1-4D illustrate the flow paths of air passing from beneath the baffle members 120 to above the baffle members 120. Embers or flames above the baffle member 120 would have to substantially reverse one of the illustrated flow paths in order to pass through the illustrated baffle members 120.
The baffle members 120 can be held in their positions relative to each other through their connection with the generally planar member 130 at the end of the baffle members 120 (see
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4A1-4A3, air flowing through the baffle members 120 encounters a web 121 of a baffle member 120, then flows along the web 121 to a passage between flanges or edge portions 122 of the baffle members 120. As shown in FIG. 4A3, air flowing from one side of the baffle members 120 traverses a passage bounded by the flanges 122 having a width W and a length L. In some embodiments, W can be less than or approximately equal to 2.0 cm, and is preferably within 1.7-2.0 cm. In some embodiments, L can be greater than or approximately equal to 2.5 cm (or greater than 2.86 cm), and is preferably within 2.5-6.0 cm, or more narrowly within 2.86-5.72 cm. Also, with reference to FIG. 4A3, the angle α between the webs 121 and the flanges 122 is preferably less than 90 degrees, and more preferably less than 75 degrees.
In the embodiment shown in
The embodiment shown in
With reference to
Further, in the embodiments shown in
In some embodiments, such as shown in
In some embodiments, the lower baffle member 120B includes a pair of upwardly extending edge portions 122 connected at opposing sides of the bottom portion 198. Further, the upper baffle member 120A can include a pair of downwardly extending edge portions 122 connected at opposing sides of the top portion 192. The vent can also include a second elongated lower baffle member 120B configured similarly to the first elongated lower baffle member 120B and having longitudinal axis that is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the first lower baffle member 120B. One of the edge portions 122 of the first lower baffle member 120B and a first of the edge portions 122 of the upper baffle member 120A can overlap to form a narrow passage therebetween. Further, one of the edge portions 122 of the second lower baffle member 120B and a second of the edge portions 122 of the upper baffle member 120A can overlap to form a second narrow passage therebetween, such that at least some of the air flowing through the ember and/or flame impedance structure traverses a circuitous path partially formed by the second narrow passage.
Although
The baffle members cause air flowing from one side of the baffle member to another side to traverse a flow path. In some embodiments, such as the configurations shown in
A test was conducted to determine the performance of certain configurations of baffle members 120 that were constructed according to the embodiment illustrated in
The test setup included an ember generator placed over the vent being tested, and a combustible filter media was positioned below the tested vent. A fan was attached to the vent to generate an airflow from the ember generator and through the vent and filter media. One hundred grams of dried pine needles were placed in the ember generator, ignited, and allowed to burn until extinguished, approximately two and a half minutes. The combustible filter media was then removed and any indications of combustion on the filter media were observed and recorded. The test was then repeated with the other vents. Table 1 below summarizes the results of the test, as well as the dimensions and net free vent area associated with each tested vent. Net free vent area is discussed in greater detail below, but for the purposes of the tested vents, the net free vent area is calculated as the width W1 of the gap between the flanges 122 of adjacent baffle members 120, multiplied by the length of the baffle members 120 (which is 19″ for each of the tested vents), multiplied further by the number of such gaps.
Each of the tested vents offered enhanced protection against ember intrusion, as compared to a baseline setup in which the tested vents are replaced with a screened opening. The results in Table 1 indicate that the first tested vent had improved performance for prevention of ember intrusion relative to the second tested vent. Moreover, the first tested vent also had a higher net free vent area than the second tested vent.
The results in Table 1 also indicate that the third tested vent offers the best performance for prevention of ember intrusion. It is believed that this is due in part to the fewer number of gaps between adjacent baffle members 120 that were present in the third tested vent, which restricted the paths through which embers could pass. Another factor believed to contribute to the ember resistance of the third tested vent is the greater distance embers had to travel to pass through the vent by virtue of the larger dimensions of the baffle members 120, which may provide a greater opportunity for the embers to extinguish. The third tested vent had the lowest net free vent area. The results indicate that a vent having a configuration similar to the third tested vent but having still larger dimensions (e.g., W1=1.0″, W2=2.0″, W3=4.0″) would maintain the ember intrusion resistance while increasing the net free vent area relative to the third tested vent. The upper bounds for the dimensions of the baffle member will depend on the type of roof on which the vent is employed, the size of the roof tiles, and other considerations.
As noted elsewhere in this application, the goal of preventing ember intrusion must be balanced against the goal of providing adequate ventilation. The results of this test indicate that, for a vent configured in the manner illustrated in
However, as noted above, in some embodiments it may be desirable to position the first vent member 100 in a different portion of the roof than the second vent member 200.
As described above, displacing (laterally or upslope/downslope) the first vent member 100 relative to the second vent member 200 can advantageously provide a further barrier to entry of embers or flames through the vent system 10. Displacement can additionally protect persons walking on the roof, such as firefighters, from falling through or into holes in the roof deck. This is because if a person's foot falls through the second vent member 200, displacing the hole in the roof deck 50 (i.e., the hole at which the first vent member 100 is positioned) away from the second vent member 200 helps to prevent the hole from being located in a position where the foot will proceed through the roof deck hole. Thus, if a person's foot breaks through the second vent member 200, the fall can be stopped by the roof deck 50. Displacement of the first and second vent members 100, 200 can provide other performance advantages as well. For example, it has been found that displacement can help to prevent “backloading” of the vent system. Backloading occurs when unusual conditions, such as strong winds or violent storms, force air to flow through a vent system in a direction opposite from the direction for which the vent system was designed.
The first vent member 100 of the one-piece embodiment can be configured substantially as described hereinabove with reference to
With continued reference to
The mesh material can be secured to the base 330 and/or baffle wall 320 by any of a variety of different methods, including without limitation adhesion, welding, and the like. In some embodiments, the base 330 includes a ledge (not shown) extending radially inward from the baffle wall 320, the ledge helping to support the mesh material 340.
In various embodiments, the mesh material 340 substantially inhibits the ingress of floating embers. Compared to the baffle members 120 and 220 described above, the mesh material 340 may provide greater ventilation. The baffle system restricts the amount of net free ventilating area (NFVA) under the ICC Acceptance Criteria for Attic Vents—AC132. Under AC132, the amount of NFVA is calculated at the smallest or most critical cross-sectional area of the airway of the vent. Sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 of AC132 (February 2009) read as follows:
“4.1.1. The net free area for any airflow pathway (airway) shall be the gross cross-sectional area less the area of any physical obstructions at the smallest or most critical cross-sectional area in the airway. The net free area shall be determined for each airway in the installed device.”
“4.1.2. The NFVA for the device shall be the sum of the net free areas determined for all airways in the installed device.”
Consider now the roof vent 10 illustrated in
Contrast that with a roof vent employing a primary vent member 300 as shown in
In preferred embodiments, the vents disclosed herein are preferably designed to engage surrounding roof cover elements (e.g., roof tiles) in accordance with a repeating engagement pattern of the cover elements. In other words, embodiments of the vents can be assembled with the roof cover elements without cutting or otherwise modifying the cover elements to fit with the vents. As explained above, the secondary vent member (including without limitation all of the embodiments described herein) can be offset laterally, upslope, or downslope from the primary vent member (including without limitation all of the two-piece embodiments described herein), for example by 2-4 roof cover elements. When utilized in conjunction with fire-resistant underlayment and construction materials, this offsetting of the vent members provides added protection against flame and ember intrusion into the building.
The first vent member 300 of the one-piece embodiment can be configured substantially as described hereinabove with reference to
The second vent member 400 of the one-piece embodiment includes a tapered top with louver slits 416 on its top surface and an opening 418 on its front edge. Between the first vent member 300 and the second vent member 400 is a cavity, which may include screens or other filtering structures to prevent the ingress of debris, wind-driven rain, and pests. In use, air from a region below the roof deck passes through the first vent member 300 then through a cavity between the first and second vent members 300, 400, then through the louver slits 416 and/or the opening 418. The one-piece embodiment shown in
Although the invention has been disclosed in the context of certain embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Accordingly, the invention is not intended to be limited by the specific disclosures of preferred embodiments herein.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/158,004, filed Oct. 11, 2018, entitled EMBER-RESISTANT AND FLAME-RESISTANT ROOF VENTILATION SYSTEM, which is a continuation and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/688,847, filed Apr. 16, 2015, entitled EMBER-RESISTANT AND FLAME-RESISTANT ROOF VENTILATION SYSTEM, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,105,559, issued on Oct. 23, 2018, which is a continuation and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/465,236, filed May 13, 2009, entitled EMBER-RESISTANT AND FLAME-RESISTANT ROOF VENTILATION SYSTEM, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,011,221, issued on Apr. 21, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/052,862, filed May 13, 2008, entitled EMBER-RESISTANT AND FLAME-RESISTANT ROOF VENTILATION SYSTEM, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2343764 | Fuller | Mar 1944 | A |
2638835 | Strawsine | May 1953 | A |
2733649 | LeBarron | Feb 1956 | A |
3027090 | Zerhan, Jr. | Mar 1962 | A |
3311047 | Smith et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3368473 | Sohda et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3376164 | Baehwansky et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3598686 | Clark | Aug 1971 | A |
3598688 | Bellamy | Aug 1971 | A |
3685596 | Collins | Aug 1972 | A |
3780872 | Pall | Dec 1973 | A |
3951336 | Miller et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4040867 | Forestieri et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4054729 | Isenberg | Oct 1977 | A |
4083097 | Anagnostou et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4090435 | Vallee | May 1978 | A |
4097308 | Klein et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4189881 | Hawley | Feb 1980 | A |
4201121 | Brandenburg, Jr. | May 1980 | A |
4224081 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4228729 | Messick | Oct 1980 | A |
4239555 | Scharlack et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4251026 | Siegel et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4314548 | Hanson | Feb 1982 | A |
4382435 | Brill-Edwards | May 1983 | A |
4383129 | Gupta et al. | May 1983 | A |
4432273 | Devitt | Feb 1984 | A |
4433200 | Jester et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4530273 | Smith | Jul 1985 | A |
4574160 | Cull et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4602739 | Sutton, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
D285829 | Lock | Sep 1986 | S |
4625469 | Gentry et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4692557 | Samuelson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4759272 | Zaniewski | Jul 1988 | A |
4803816 | Klober | Feb 1989 | A |
4843794 | Holtgreve | Jul 1989 | A |
4850166 | Taylor | Jul 1989 | A |
4965971 | Jean-Jacques et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4977818 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4986469 | Sutton, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
4995308 | Waggoner et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5048225 | Brandli | Sep 1991 | A |
5049801 | Potter | Sep 1991 | A |
5060444 | Paquette | Oct 1991 | A |
5078047 | Wimberly | Jan 1992 | A |
5095810 | Robinson | May 1992 | A |
5122095 | Wolfert | Jun 1992 | A |
5131200 | McKinnon | Jul 1992 | A |
5131888 | Adkins, II | Jul 1992 | A |
5167579 | Rotter | Dec 1992 | A |
5228925 | Nath et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232518 | Nath et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5296043 | Kawakami et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316592 | Dinwoodie | May 1994 | A |
5333783 | Catan | Aug 1994 | A |
5364026 | Kundert | Nov 1994 | A |
5391235 | Inoue | Feb 1995 | A |
5427571 | Sells et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458538 | MacLeod et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480494 | Inoue | Jan 1996 | A |
5486238 | Nakagawa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5505788 | Dinwoodie | Apr 1996 | A |
5528229 | Mehta | Jun 1996 | A |
5561953 | Rotter | Oct 1996 | A |
5620368 | Bates et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5697192 | Inoue | Dec 1997 | A |
5706617 | Hirai et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722887 | Wolfson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728000 | Bateman | Mar 1998 | A |
5740636 | Archard | Apr 1998 | A |
5746653 | Palmer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746839 | Dinwoodie | May 1998 | A |
5766681 | Stoddart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772502 | Smith | Jun 1998 | A |
5814118 | Wickland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5890322 | Fears | Apr 1999 | A |
5971848 | Nair | Oct 1999 | A |
5990414 | Posnansky | Nov 1999 | A |
6008450 | Ohtsuka et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6050039 | O'Hagin | Apr 2000 | A |
6051774 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061978 | Dinwoodie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077159 | Clayton | Jun 2000 | A |
6105317 | Tomiuchi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129628 | O'Hagin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155006 | Mimura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6220956 | Killian et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227963 | Headrick | May 2001 | B1 |
6241602 | Allen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242685 | Mizukami | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243995 | Reeves et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277024 | Coulton | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286273 | Villela et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294724 | Sasaoka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306030 | Wilson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308473 | Auck | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336304 | Mimura et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361434 | Brandon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365824 | Nakazima et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371847 | Headrick | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6390914 | O'Hagin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415559 | Reeves et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418678 | Rotter | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6439466 | Fikes | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6447390 | O'Hagin | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453629 | Nakazima et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6491579 | O'Hagin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501013 | Dinwoodie | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6541693 | Takada et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571522 | Perini | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606828 | Lin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606830 | Nagao et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6662509 | Sharp et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6662510 | Rotter | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695692 | York | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6780099 | Harper | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799742 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6870087 | Gallagher | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6941706 | Austin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7024828 | Headrick | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053294 | Tuttle et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7101279 | O'Hagin | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7178295 | Dinwoodie | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7250000 | Daniels, II | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D549316 | O'Hagin et al. | Aug 2007 | S |
7320774 | Simmons et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7424790 | Austin et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7469508 | Ceria | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7506477 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509775 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531740 | Flaherty et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540118 | Jensen | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578102 | Banister | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587864 | McCaskill et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618310 | Daniels | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7642449 | Korman et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7678990 | McCaskill et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7736940 | Basol | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7757440 | Austin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7882670 | West | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901278 | O'Hagin | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8112945 | Austin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8782967 | Daniels | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9011221 | Daniels | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9140013 | Daniels | Sep 2015 | B2 |
10105559 | Daniels | Oct 2018 | B2 |
11383111 | Daniels | Jul 2022 | B2 |
20010027804 | Inoue et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020086634 | Selis | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030005649 | Austin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030159802 | Steneby et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040098932 | Broatch | May 2004 | A1 |
20050191957 | Demetry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050239393 | Reese | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239394 | O'Hagin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246972 | Polumbus | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060052047 | Daniels | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052051 | Daniels, II | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060117695 | Estes | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060213767 | Anaf | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060240763 | Takeda | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070067063 | Ahmed | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072541 | Daniels et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094953 | Galeazzo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130850 | Miekka | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173191 | Daniels, II et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070207725 | O'Hagin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243820 | O'Hagin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070275652 | Berkompas | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080098672 | O'Hagin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080220714 | Caruso | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080299892 | Robinson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090113817 | Austin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090203308 | Daniels | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100227540 | Smith | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100229940 | Basol | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100325978 | Montgomery | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120110924 | Makin | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2804301 | Aug 1979 | DE |
3132152 | Jun 1982 | DE |
19823356 | Nov 1999 | DE |
2324823 | Apr 1977 | FR |
805978 | Dec 1958 | GB |
2183819 | Jun 1987 | GB |
2211287 | Jun 1989 | GB |
2279453 | Jan 1995 | GB |
2345536 | Jul 2000 | GB |
59-60138 | Apr 1984 | JP |
06-241517 | Aug 1994 | JP |
06-272920 | Sep 1994 | JP |
09-158428 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10-061133 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11-044035 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-229576 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-274032 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2004-092298 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005-325592 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-534924 | Nov 2007 | JP |
WO 9214971 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 0140568 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 05108708 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 11126773 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
2001 California Building Code, Jun. 21, 2006, Chapter 7A, pp. 1-90.3-1.90.5. |
Building Materials Listing Program, Office of the State Fire Marshal—Fire Engineering—BML Program, http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/bml.html, Printed Feb. 27, 2008, 2 pages. |
Burning Metal, Popular Science pp. 86 (Nov. 2007). |
Chilenswe, 2005, Optimising the airflow performance of ventiators for natural ventilation in buidlings, Doctoral Dissertion, Sheffield Hallam University, UK, pp. 244-245. |
Classic Chemistry Demonstrations, Compiled by Ted Lister, The Royal Society of Chemistry (1995). |
Grill Screens, foodservicedirect.com, http://www.foodservicedirect.com/index.cfm/S/107/CLID/3362/N/9304/Grill_Screens.html, Printed Feb. 29, 2008, 1 page. |
Roof Battens, NASH—National Association of Steel-Framed Housing, http://www.nash.asn.au/whyChooseStStartOwnBuildRoofBatten.php, Printed Mar. 5, 2008, 2 pages. |
Section 1203.2 of the 2007 California Building Code, Chapter 12. |
Stainless Steel Scrubber—Silver Color, foodservicedirect.com, http://www.foodservicedirect.com/index.cfm/S/107/CLID/3362/N/102336/Stainless_Steel . . . , Printed Feb. 29, 2008, 1 page. |
Synthetic Roof Underlayment, ToolBase Services, http://www.toolbase.org/Technology-Inventory/Roofs/synthetic-roof-underlayment, Printed Mar. 5, 2008, 3 pages. |
Tile Batten, http://www.metrollqld.com.au/minisites/products/tilebatten.html, Apr. 12, 2001, 2 pages. |
Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Products, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection—Office of the State Fire Marshall, Published by CAL-FIRE Wildland Fire Prevention Engineering, http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/pdf/fireengineering/bml/wuiproducts.pdf, Revised Dec. 28, 2007, 11 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2008 in corresponding Malaysian Application No. PI 20054111. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2005 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2005/029918. |
Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
Advisory Action dated Nov. 14, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,456, filed Oct. 24, 2007. |
Office Action in Australian Application No. 2009246322, filed May 13, 2009, dated Nov. 28, 2013. |
Office Action in Australian Application No. 2009246322, filed May 13, 2009, dated Aug. 5, 2014. |
Notice of Acceptance in Australian Patent Application No. 2009246322, filed May 13, 2009, dated Dec. 8, 2014. |
Office Action with cited references received in related application Australia Patent Application No. 2014277679, Filed: Dec. 16, 2014, Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2016. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2724010, filed May 13, 2009, dated Apr. 30, 2015. |
Office Action received in related application Canadian Patent Application No. 2,724,010, Filed: Nov. 13, 2010, Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015. |
European Search Report dated May 20, 2015 from related Application No. EP 09747505.7. |
Office Action in European Application No. 09747505.7, filed May 13, 2009, dated Dec. 16, 2016. |
Office Action in European Patent Application No. 09747505.7, dated Oct. 10, 2017, filed May 13, 2009. |
Office Action received in related application European Application No. 09747505.7, Filed May 13, 2009, dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
Office Action in Indian Patent Application No. 8859/DELNP/2010, dated Jan. 25, 2018, filed May 13, 2009. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-509667, filed May 13, 2009, dated Aug. 26, 2014. |
Office Action in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-509667, filed May 13, 2009, dated Aug. 26, 2014. |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2013 in Japanese Application No. 2011-509667, filed May 13, 2009. |
Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2013 in Japanese Application No. 2011-509667, filed May 13, 2009. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-238314, filed Nov. 26, 2014, dated Dec. 8, 2015. |
Office Action in Malaysian Application No. PI 2010005332, filed May 13, 2009, dated Oct. 31, 2014. |
Office Action in Philippines Application No. 2010/502554, filed May 13, 2009, dated May 28, 2015. |
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2010149942/12, filed May 13, 2009, dated Mar. 21, 2013. |
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2010149942/12, filed May 13, 2009, dated Oct. 11, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance in Russian Patent Application No. 2010149942/12, filed May 13, 2009, dated May 23, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 24, 2009, PCT Appl. No. PCT/US09/43838 filed May 13, 2009, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/030027, filed Mar. 25, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230058616 A1 | Feb 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61052862 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16158004 | Oct 2018 | US |
Child | 17811278 | US | |
Parent | 14688847 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 16158004 | US | |
Parent | 12465236 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 14688847 | US |