The present invention relates to apparatus and methods for providing embolic protection in a patient's vascular system. In particular, it relates to an embolic protection device that can be deployed in a patient's aorta to protect the aortic arch vessels and downstream organs from potential emboli. The embolic protection device can be used acutely, for example for embolic protection during cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology procedures, or it can be implanted for chronic embolic protection, for example from cardiogenic emboli or emboli from ruptured or vulnerable aortic plaque.
Cerebral embolism is a known complication of cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass and catheter-based interventional cardiology and electrophysiology procedures. Embolic particles, which may include thrombus, atheroma and lipids, may become dislodged by surgical or catheter manipulations and enter the bloodstream, embolizing in the brain or other vital organs downstream. Other sources of potential emboli include cardiogenic emboli, such as thrombus that results from chronic atrial fibrillation, and emboli from ruptured or vulnerable aortic plaque. Cerebral embolism can lead to neuropsychological deficits, stroke and even death. Other organs downstream can also be damaged by embolism, resulting in diminished function or organ failure. Prevention of embolism would benefit patients and improve the outcome of these procedures.
Given that the sources of potential emboli can be acute or chronic, it would be advantageous to provide an embolic protection device that can either be used acutely, for example for embolic protection during cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology procedures, or that can be implanted for chronic embolic protection, for example from cardiogenic emboli or emboli from ruptured or vulnerable aortic plaque. A further advantage would be realized by providing an embolic protection device that can be implanted without interfering with transluminal aortic access for performing future surgeries and other interventional or diagnostic procedures. Another advantage would come from providing an embolic protection device that can be retrieved and removed from the patient after the necessity for it has passed. Yet another advantage would come from providing an embolic protection device that can be deployed and retrieved using minimally invasive techniques.
Previous devices for preventing cerebral embolism are described in the following patents and patent applications, which are hereby incorporated by reference: U.S. Pat. App. 20040215167 Embolic protection device, PCT App. WO/2004/019817 Embolic protection device, U.S. Pat. No. 6,371,935 Aortic catheter with flow divider and methods for preventing cerebral embolization, U.S. Pat. No. 6,361,545 Perfusion filter catheter, U.S. Pat. No. 6,254,563 Perfusion shunt apparatus and method, U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,517 Perfusion shunt apparatus and method, U.S. Pat. No. 6,537,297 Methods of protecting a patient from embolization during surgery, U.S. Pat. No. 6,499,487 Implantable cerebral protection device and methods of use, U.S. Pat. No. 5,769,816 Cannula with associated filter, U.S. Pat. App. 20030100940 Implantable intraluminal protector device and method of using same for stabilizing atheromas.
The filter mesh material of the conical inner structure 104 and the cylindrical outer structure 102 may be made of knitted, woven or nonwoven fibers, filaments or wires and will have a pore size chosen to stop emboli above a certain size to pass through. The filter mesh material may be made of a metal, a polymer or a combination thereof and may optionally have an antithrombogenic coating on its surface. The filter mesh material of the conical inner structure 104 and the cylindrical outer structure 102 may have the same pore size or they may have different pore sizes. For example, the filter mesh material of the conical inner structure 104 and the cylindrical outer structure 102 may both have a pore size in the range of approximately 1 mm to 0.1 mm or even smaller, depending on whether it is intended to capture macroemboli only or microemboli as well. Alternatively, the filter mesh material of the cylindrical outer structure 102 may have a pore size to stop microemboli as small as 0.1 mm and the filter mesh material of the conical inner structure 104 may have a pore size to stop macroemboli larger than 1 mm. In another alternate embodiment, a portion of the cylindrical outer structure 102 configured to be positioned away from the aortic arch vessels may be constructed of an impermeable material rather than the filter mesh material.
The narrow upstream end of the conical inner structure 104 has a catheter port 106 with a resilient seal that is sized for passage of a catheter shaft.
Optionally, when the embolic protection device 100 is intended to be used for embolic protection during a catheter-based diagnostic or interventional procedure, the delivery catheter 124 may be configured as a diagnostic catheter, a guiding catheter or therapeutic catheter.
The embolic protection device 100 will preferably be self-supporting in the deployed condition. This can be accomplished with a variety of different constructions. In one example, the conical inner structure 104 and the cylindrical outer structure 102 can be constructed with a resilient filter mesh material that can be compressed into the undeployed condition and will self-expand into the deployed condition. Alternatively, the filter mesh can be supported by a framework that includes an upstream hoop 112, a downstream hoop 114 and one or more longitudinal struts 113 that form the cylindrical outer structure 102 and one or more angled struts 107 that, together with the downstream hoop 114, form the conical inner structure 104. In an alternate construction, the upstream end of the conical inner structure 104 can be supported by one or more radial struts connected to the upstream hoop 112, obviating the need for the angled struts 107. (
The embolic protection device 100 may be constructed with the conical inner structure 104 and the cylindrical outer structure 102 having approximately the same longitudinal dimensions, as shown in the drawings. Alternatively, the conical inner structure 104 or the cylindrical outer structure 102 can be made longer or shorter without adversely affecting the performance of the product. In another alternate construction, the cylindrical outer structure 102 can be made slightly conical with the larger end of the cone on the upstream side.
Optionally, the embolic protection device 100 may include features to assist in retracting the device for retrieval from the patient's aorta. For example, the upstream end 108 and the downstream end 110 of the embolic protection device 100 may be constructed with retraction members 116, 120 that are configured like purse strings or lassos around the circumference of the cylindrical outer structure 102. A pull loop 122 or other graspable structure near the downstream end 110 of the embolic protection device 100 is connected to the retraction members 116, 120 by one or more connecting members 113. Optionally, two separate pull loops 122 may be provided for selectively retracting the upstream and downstream retraction members 116, 120. The retraction members 116, 120 and connecting members 113 may be made of suture, wire, plastic filament or a combination of these materials. In an alternate construction, the support hoops 112, 114 described above may also be configured to serve as the retraction members 116, 120.
The catheter port 106 in the embolic protection device 100 allows transluminal aortic access for performing future surgeries and other interventional or diagnostic procedures.
In one particularly preferred embodiment, the embolic protection device 100 is configured to close the upstream end 108 of the cylindrical outer structure 102 first to assure that any captured emboli do not migrate out of the collection chamber 103. This can be accomplished by providing two separate pull loops 122 for selectively retracting the upstream and downstream retraction members 116, 120. Alternatively, it can be accomplished by configuring the connecting members 118 so that, when the pull loop 122 is pulled, the upstream retraction member 116 is automatically tightened before the downstream retraction member 120 is tightened.
The entire embolic protection device or a portion of it may be coated with an antithrombogenic coating, for example a bonded heparin coating, to reduce the formation of clots that could become potential emboli. Alternatively or in addition, the embolic protection device or a portion of it may have a drug-eluting coating containing an anti-inflammatory or antistenosis agent.
The uninflated embolic protection device 100 may be delivered into the patient's aorta on a guidewire or delivery catheter and/or inside of a delivery sheath. Once, the embolic protection device 100 is in the proper position within the aortic arch, the inflatable support framework 160 is inflated through the inflation tube 170. At least the distal inflatable toroidal balloon 164, and optionally the proximal inflatable toroidal balloon 162, makes a seal with the aortic wall when inflated so that blood flow will be directed into the collection chamber 103 and through the filter mesh material to capture any potential emboli. If the embolic protection device 100 is intended for short term use, the proximal end of the inflation tube 170 may be left exposed at the insertion site. Alternatively, if the embolic protection device 100 is intended for long term use, the inflation tube 170 may be detached from the inflated embolic protection device 100. As another alternative, the proximal end of the inflation tube 170 may be buried under the patient's skin to allow later access for deflating and withdrawing the embolic protection device 100.
When the embolic protection device 100 is no longer needed, the inflatable support framework 160 is deflated and the embolic protection device 100 is withdrawn from the patient. Preferably, the embolic protection device 100 is configured such that the distal toroidal balloon 164 on the upstream end of the collection chamber 103 deflates first to effectively capture any potential emboli inside of the collection chamber 103. Other mechanisms described herein may also be used to assist in retracting the embolic protection device 100.
Other mechanisms may be employed for deploying and/or retrieving the embolic protection device 100. For example, the embolic protection device 100 can be elongated in the longitudinal direction to cause it contract radially. Releasing the tension on the embolic protection device 100 allows it to contract in the longitudinal direction and to expand radially for deployment. A retrieval catheter can be configured to apply longitudinal tension to the embolic protection device 100 to collapse it radially for withdrawal from the patient. Alternatively or in addition, the embolic protection device 100 can be twisted or wrapped to cause it contract radially. Releasing the embolic protection device 100 allows it to untwisted or unwrapped and to expand radially for deployment. A retrieval catheter can be configured to apply torque to the embolic protection device 100 to twist or wrap it to collapse it radially for withdrawal from the patient. These mechanisms may also be used in combination with the methods described above, such as those using retraction members or an inflatable support framework, to deploy and/or retrieve the embolic protection device 100.
Alternate embodiments of the embolic protection device 100 may combine features of the embodiments described herein to accomplish the same ends. For example, an embolic protection device 100 may be constructed with a single hoop 112 or inflatable toroidal balloon 164 on the upstream end of a cylindrical or conical outer structure 102 in contact with the vessel wall to anchor the device and to direct blood flow into the emboli collection chamber 103. The downstream end of the outer structure 102 may be constructed without a hoop or toroidal balloon, or alternatively with a smaller diameter hoop or toroidal balloon, as it is not critical for the downstream end of the embolic protection device 100 to contact or make a seal with the vessel wall. The inner conical structure 104 may be constructed with self-supporting filter mesh material or the filter mesh material may be supported on a framework of resilient struts and/or inflatable struts.
The embolic protection device of the present invention can also be used for embolic protection of other organ systems. For example, an embolic protection device can be deployed in the patient's descending aorta for preventing embolic particles in the aortic blood flow from entering the renal arteries and embolizing in the patient's kidneys.
While the present invention has been described herein with respect to the exemplary embodiments and the best mode for practicing the invention, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications, improvements and subcombinations of the various embodiments, adaptations and variations can be made to the invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/691,471, filed Aug. 30, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/801,850, filed Jul. 17, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,770,318, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/532,630, filed Apr. 26, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,107,734, which is the National Stage Entry of PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/024558, filed Nov. 29, 2007, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/861,687, filed on Nov. 29, 2006, the full disclosures of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4790809 | Kuntz | Dec 1988 | A |
5108419 | Reger et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5197485 | Grooters | Mar 1993 | A |
5643227 | Stevens | Jul 1997 | A |
5769816 | Barbut et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769819 | Schwab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797880 | Erskine | Aug 1998 | A |
5800525 | Bachinski et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6013051 | Nelson | Jan 2000 | A |
6117154 | Barbut et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139517 | Macoviak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6152144 | Lesh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6254563 | Macoviak et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258120 | McKenzie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6348063 | Yassour et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355051 | Sisskind et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361545 | Macoviak | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371935 | Macoviak et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6461370 | Gray et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499487 | McKenzie et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537297 | Tsugita et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6682543 | Barbut et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695864 | Macoviak et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6746469 | Mouw | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6808520 | Fourkas et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7044958 | Douk et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7232453 | Shimon | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235060 | Kraus | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7537600 | Eskuri et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7758606 | Streeter et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766932 | Melzer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8052717 | Mujkanovic et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8114114 | Belson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123779 | Demond et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8298258 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8337519 | Wasicek et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8382788 | Galdonik et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8414482 | Belson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8420902 | Gilsinger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8679149 | Belson | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8728114 | Belson | May 2014 | B2 |
8740930 | Goodwin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8968354 | Wang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9107734 | Belson | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9144485 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9492265 | Russell et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9744023 | Wang et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9770318 | Belson et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
1001626 | Belson | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20010044632 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004667 | Adams et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020058964 | Addis | May 2002 | A1 |
20020128680 | Pavlovic | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030040736 | Stevens et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040772 | Hyodoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030100940 | Yodfat | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125765 | Blackledge et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171803 | Shimon | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208224 | Broome | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040034380 | Woolfson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073253 | Morrill et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040138692 | Phung et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040215167 | Belson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225354 | Allen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050010246 | Streeter et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050283186 | Berrada et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060287668 | Fawzi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293706 | Shimon | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070027534 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060944 | Boldenow et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073246 | Simon | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080027481 | Gilson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090149881 | Vale et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090254172 | Grewe | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100010535 | Mujkanovic et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100106180 | Strother et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100274277 | Eaton | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312268 | Belson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120016408 | Barbut et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120271340 | Castellano et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120330348 | Strauss et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130096606 | Bruchman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130245669 | Basu et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267993 | Carpenter et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140058372 | Belson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140214069 | Franklin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140249568 | Adams et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150320540 | Belson | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150366650 | Zi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160317277 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170360547 | Belson | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180206970 | Eggert et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190015152 | Howard et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2609800 | Jan 2007 | CA |
1179321 | Feb 2002 | EP |
WO-0007656 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0027292 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-03047648 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03073961 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03094791 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-2004019817 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 6,348,062 B1, 02/2002, Hopkins et al. (withdrawn) |
Final Office action dated Oct. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/691,471. |
Office action dated Jun. 28, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/691,471. |
European search report with search opinion dated Jun. 22, 2017 for EP Application No. 07840099.1. |
“European search report with written opinion dated Feb. 17, 2017 for EP07840099”. |
International search report and written opinion dated Apr. 9, 2008 for PCT/US2007/024558. |
International search report and written opinion dated Apr. 22, 2013 for PCT Application No. US2013/20563. |
“International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 14, 2015 for PCT/US2015/049908.” |
International search report dated Jan. 15, 2004 for PCT/US2003/026938. |
Notice of allowance dated Feb. 26, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,986. |
Notice of allowance dated Mar. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,538. |
Notice of allowance dated Apr. 15, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,630. |
Notice of allowance dated May 31, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,850. |
Notice of allowance dated Aug. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/347,046. |
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,850. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,992. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 18, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,887. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 23, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/493,854. |
Office action dated Jan. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,630. |
Office action dated Jan. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/735,864. |
Office action dated Feb. 26, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,630. |
Office action dated Mar. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,630. |
“Office action dated Apr. 7, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,850.” |
Office action dated Apr. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,538. |
Office action dated Apr. 10, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,630. |
Office action dated Jun. 10, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,630. |
Office action dated Jul. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/735,864. |
Office action dated Jul. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,992. |
Office action dated Jul. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,887. |
Office action dated Aug. 25, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/175,042. |
Office action dated Sep. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,850. |
Office action dated Nov. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,850. |
Office action dated Nov. 19, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,630. |
Office action dated Dec. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,538. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190307544 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60861687 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15691471 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 16450871 | US | |
Parent | 14801850 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15691471 | US | |
Parent | 12532630 | US | |
Child | 14801850 | US |