The present invention relates to minimally invasive and catheter delivered embolic capture devices for use in the vasculature, especially those suited for usage in the brain and vessel systems perfusing the same.
Several acute stroke therapy trials were reported in 2007. Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II found a 9.9% rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after combination IV-intra-arterial (IA) tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy was administered within 3 hours of acute stroke onset.
Further results from the MERCI and Multi-MERCI investigators have shown that successful recanalization of acute distal ICA and proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions can be achieved in 53% to 63% of patients using the MERCI retriever (Concentric Medical) alone or in combination with IV/IA thrombolytics, yet symptomatic hemorrhages occurred in 6% of those patients who were recanalized.
Another approach in those who fail MERCI retrieval has been to use angioplasty or self-expanding stents to compress friable clots and allow better penetration of thrombolytic agents. Recanalization rates of up to 89% with balloons and 79% with stents have been achieved in small numbers of patients.
Reports of aggressive revascularization of acute ICA and tandem ICA/middle cerebral artery occlusions using stents and intracranial thrombolysis have demonstrated the feasibility of this approach, again in small numbers of patients.
Attempts to identify prognostic factors for hemorrhagic complications and eventual clinical outcomes in patients undergoing these aggressive multimodal interventions showed that residual distal occlusions, tandem occlusions, larger initial pretreatment CT infarct size by Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) score, hyperglycemia and use of both IA and IV thrombolytics were all associated with negative results. Novel mechanical revascularization strategies used deflated microballoon catheters and the Alligator retrieval device (Chestnut Medical Technologies) to open vessels that may be refractory to IA thrombolytics or the MERCI device.
There are new stents being used to assist in the coiling of wide-necked aneurysms, such as the closed-cell design Enterprise (Cordis Neurovascular, Inc), the electrodetachable, fully retrievable Solo (eV3 Neurovascular) and the covered, balloon-expandable Willis (Microport). Development of significant focal stenosis remains a problem, seen in up to 5.8% of stent-assisted cases. A novel approach is to use a high-coverage, endoluminal mesh to divert flow and thus induce aneurysm thrombosis. The Pipeline Neuroendovascular Device (Chestnut Medical Technologies) is a tubular, bimetallic implant with approximately 30% coverage by area. Preliminary experience in humans has been encouraging.
It is hoped that immunohistochemical and molecular biological data can be used to develop biologically active endovascular devices in the future. A novel method for depositing viable, migration capable fibroblasts on coils and successfully passing them through microcatheters may be a promising technique for endovascular intervention.
Intra-arterial (IA) therapies for acute stroke have evolved over the past decade. Despite the promising results of the PROACT II study, which demonstrated a 66% recanalization rate, substantially higher recanalization rates with IA pharmacologic thrombolysis have not been achieved over the past 7 years. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a clot retrieval device (Merci retriever X5, X6; Concentric Medical, Mountain View, Calif.). Unfortunately, when used alone, the clot retriever is successful in only approximately 50% of cases, and multiple passes with this device are often required to achieve successful recanalization. IA thrombolytics administered concomitantly enhance the procedural success of this device but may increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation of the reperfused infarction. There have been several reports of coronary stent implantation used for mechanical thrombolysis of recalcitrant occlusions. In a recent report, stent placement with balloon-mounted or self-expanding coronary stents was shown to be an independent predictor for recanalization of both intracranial and extracranial cerebrovascular occlusions. In another recent report, recanalization rates of 79% were achieved using balloon-mounted stent technology.
Self-expanding stents designed specifically for the cerebrovasculature can be delivered to target areas of intracranial stenosis with a success rate of >95% and an increased safety profile of deliverability because these stents are deployed at significantly lower pressures than balloon-mounted coronary stents. There has been an anecdotal report of the use of a self-expanding stent in the setting of acute symptomatic intracranial occlusion. In addition, a recent comparison of self-expanding and balloon-mounted stents in an animal model of acute embolic occlusion has shown no difference in the 2 stent groups with respect to recanalization rates.
This retrospective multicenter series demonstrates that the use of self-expanding stents is feasible in the setting of symptomatic medium- and large-vessel intracranial occlusions. With stent placement as a first-line mechanical treatment or as a “last-resort” maneuver, TIMI/TICI 2 or 3 revascularization was successfully obtained in 79% of the lesions in which stents were placed. This retrospective review suggests that focal occlusions limited to a single medium or large vessel, particularly solitary occlusions of the MCA or VBS, may be preferentially amenable to stent placement and thus can help clinicians to achieve improved rates of recanalization. In addition, gender may playa role in the success of self-expanding stent implantation: TIMI/TICI 2 or 3 flow was documented in all female patients studied, and female patients were more likely to achieve improved clinical outcomes as measured by NIHSS and mRS scores. Most importantly, our preliminary experience may lead to future pivotal studies that might aid clinicians to better stratify patients most likely to derive maximal clinical benefit from stent placement.
The use of other mechanical means has been reported to be effective in recanalization of acute occlusions. In the MERCI trial, overall recanalization rates (TIMI/TICI 2 or 3 flow) of 48% were achieved with the Merci mechanical clot retriever.
Several authors have proposed endovascular treatment with stent deployment for ICA dissection with high-grade stenosis or occlusion when anticoagulation fails to prevent a new ischemic event. In these cases, the MCA was patent.
We found that stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis/thrombectomy compared favorably with IV rtPA thrombolysis.
This higher rate of MCA recanalization could be explained by carotid flow restoration, allowing direct access to the MCA thrombus.
Endovascular treatment could potentially extend the therapeutic window beyond 3 hours. Actually, in all cases in the endovascular group, MCA recanalization was obtained by 291 minutes.
Despite these promising preliminary results, potential drawbacks related to the procedure must be considered. Acute complications such as transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke, femoral or carotid dissection, and death have been reported. Other potential hazards of endovascular treatment of carotid dissection could be observed, as they were in stenting of other cases of arteriopathy. In our series, 1 embolic stroke and 1 acute in-stent thrombosis occurred in the same patient. Despite this new infarction, we observed significant neurologic improvement in this patient, probably because the MCA remained patent. Late stent thrombosis has also been reported.
Devices, methods, and systems facilitate and enable treatment of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. More specifically, a tethered basket-like system operates in conjunction with a microcatheter system, to provide arterial support and capture emboli.
According to a feature of the present invention, a device for the removal of emboli is disclosed comprising a mesh capturer having at least an undeployed state and a deployed state, the mesh capturer being inserted into the neurovasculature in an undeployed state and removed from the microvasculature in its deployed state; wherein the mesh capturer is deployed into its deployed state distal to an embolus and advanced proximally until the embolus is substantially contained within the mesh capturer; and wherein the basket is deployed above the subclavian artery and common carotid artery.
According to a feature of the present invention, a method for removing an embolus is disclosed comprising inserting a microcatheter and guidewire distal to an embolus; inserting a embolus capture device over the wire through the microcatheter distal to the embolus; deploying the embolus capture device; retracting the deployed embolus capture device until the embolus is substantially contained within the embolus capture device; and removing the embolus capture device.
The above-mentioned features and objects of the present invention will become more apparent with reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and in which:
In the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, biological, electrical, functional, and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims. As used in the present invention, the term “or” shall be understood to be defined as a logical disjunction and shall not indicate an exclusive disjunction unless expressly indicated as such or notated as “xor.”
The ideal stent for intracranial use would be flexible, precisely delivered, retrievable, able to be repositioned, atraumatic, available in various lengths and diameters, thin-walled and radiopaque. It should provide sufficient coverage to restrain coils, while having wide enough fenestrations to permit catheterisation with coil or other embolic agent delivery catheters. The currently available over-the-wire stents are not ideal. The balloon-expandable stents of sufficient length are too stiff to be reliably and safely deployed. While existing self-expanding stents offer some improvement in this respect there are still serious difficulties in deploying them in distal locations and the currently available or planned stents for intracranial use are not available in the small diameters necessary for distal intracranial use.
The stent is delivered through a micro-catheter, allowing standard microcatheter/wire techniques to reach locations inaccessible to over-the-wire stents. It fulfills all the criteria mentioned above. A particularly appealing characteristic is its ability to be retrieved and repositioned after complete delivery, if its position is felt to be suboptimal or if the stent proves not to be necessary. The stent conforms completely to the normal vessel geometry and is not prone to strut opening on convexities. It is compatible with all currently used embolic agents for aneurysm occlusion and is MR compatible.
Stents have been used widely in occlusive lesions in the peripheral, renal, and coronary arteries to treat stenosis of vessels narrowed by a variety of pathologic conditions. Initially used mainly in extracranial cerebral vessels for carotid artery stenosis or the treatment of pseudoaneurysms of the extracranial carotid artery, small stents are now increasingly used for intracranial vessel disease such as the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms not amenable to conventional endovascular techniques.
Major limitations of the currently available stents, usually cardiac stents, however, are their relative stiffness, rendering them not flexible enough to pass the C1/C2 vertebral artery or carotid siphon tortuosities.
The design constraints for the device used in this study were to develop an endovascular stent that is flexible enough to be delivered via a microcatheter and to be placed in small vessels but with sufficient radial forces to conform to the vessel wall when deployed.
Leaving the guidewire in place after stent deployment in curved vessels might be an option to stabilize the stent and thus prevent stent displacement while catheterizing the aneurysm with a second microcatheter. In contrast to the Neuroform, because of the design of our stent, displacement should not be an issue.
The present inventors have realized that by leveraging a conventional self-expanding reperfusion device delivery platform, a poly-modic system can be iterated which crosses a embolus, filters, and either removes the offending embolus or is optionally emplaced to address the same. A paucity of extant systems effective for such combination therapies is noted among the art. The instant system allows for natural lysis, perfusion of the challenged vessels, and importantly filters any particulates generated, to obviate the need to be concerned with distal migration of the particulates generated.
The present invention relates to emboli removal devices used to treat, among other things, ischemic stroke. Naturally, therefore, the emboli removal devices of the present invention are designed to be used in neuro-type applications, wherein the specifications of the present catheters and emboli removal devices may be deployed in the blood vessels of the cerebral vascular system. Similarly contemplated for the emboli removal systems and catheters of the present invention is deployment in other parts of the body wherein the specifications of the present invention may be used in other vessels of the body in a non-invasive manner. Specifically, the inventors of the present invention have devised devices and methods of the removal of neurocranial emboli without causing distal complication arising from the passing of larger pieces of a recovered embolus distal to the location of the original embolus.
According to embodiments, disclosed herein is a catheter-emboli removal system. The emboli removal devices of the present invention are for reperfusion of blood vessels. When the catheter-emboli removal system of the present invention is deployed into a blood vessel having an embolus, the emboli removal device is expanded and moved proximally along the vessel so that the embolus is substantially contained with the mesh basket of the emboli removal device.
According to the instant teachings, deployment of the system of the present invention establishes immediate 50% of the diameter of the lumen patency of the vessel being addressed by removing the embolus occluding the vessel. Among the prior art, no system having adequately small profile with flexibility to promote improved access for in-site treatment is known which may be used as a temporary (not implanted) solution and removed without substantial damage to the vasculature.
Additionally, in reperfusion applications the emboli removal device may be deployed as a safety device. As the embolus lyses, the deployed emboli removal device filters larger embolus particles from migrating distally, thereby reducing the chances of further complications. If reperfusion is unsuccessful, then the emboli removal device is retracted proximally, thereby substantially capturing the embolus. Then the entire device is removed together with the microcatheter.
According to embodiments and as illustrated in
To address the problem of the guidewire offset, the inventors devised an embolus capture device or basket 200 that is adept at capturing embolus 120 even when deployed in an offset way. As part of the embolus capture device/basket 200 design, pieces of embolus 120 that break away from embolus 120 are recaptured to prevent potential migration more distal in the vasculature which may potentially cause other emboli, too remote to safely address.
As illustrated in
Embolus capture device/basket 200 comprises mesh basket 210 and tethers 220 which are deployed from microcatheter 230. Mesh basket 210 comprises a radially expandable woven mesh or coil basket open on the proximal end and closed at the distal end. The mesh may be made from materials well known and understood by artisans, including polymers, fluoropolymers, nitinol, stainless steel, vectran, or kevlar. Other biocompatible materials that may be woven or coiled are similarly contemplated. Mesh basket 210 connects to microcatheter 230 via tethers 220 and is designed to be compatible such that it is removable in its deployed state without causing dissection or other damage to the vasculature.
Mesh basket 210 comprises a plurality of individual cells, having a uniform size or spacing geometry or a variable size or spacing geometry. According to embodiments where the size or spacing geometry is variable, smaller size or spacing geometry is used to provide a tight mesh for preventing the passage of small pieces of embolus 120 that break away. Larger size or spacing geometry units allow from blood flow 110. In all cases, size or spacing geometry will not allow pieces of embolus 120 that may cause potential complications. In some embodiments, the mesh basket 210 comprises struts having increased thickness adjacent to the proximal end 211 of the mesh basket 210 to provide tensile strength for opening the mesh basket 210′, such as described in U.S. Provisional No. 61/015,154, filed on Dec. 19, 2007, the entire content of which has been incorporated by reference above. The mesh basket 210 can comprise a woven retrieval basket having low porosity fine wires in the basket area to support a clot and thicker wires at a proximal end that open the retrieval basket and give tensile strength to the retrieval basket.
Tethers 220 serve to provide structure for mesh basket 210, while providing large openings whereby blood may freely flow from the proximal to distal end of embolus removal device/basket 200. According to embodiments, tethers 220 are made from the same material as mesh basket 210. Those skilled in the art will readily understand that materials for tethers and mesh may be the same, different, or interchangeable, as needed.
During deployment of embolus capture device/basket 200, mesh basket is stored in microcatheter 230 in an undeployed state. In the undeployed state, microcatheter 230 is advanced distal to embolus 120 and mesh basket 210 is deployed. According to embodiments, both mesh basket 210 and tethers 220 are deployed distal to embolus 120 to prevent tethers 220 from dislodging pieces of embolus 120 prior to full expansion of mesh basket 210, thereby preventing the pieces from advancing distal to the embolus 120 before mesh basket 210 is in place to filter them.
After deployment, according to embodiments, embolus removal system 200 is retracted proximally until embolus is substantially contained within mesh basket 210. Thereafter, mesh basket 210 and microcatheter 230 are removed from the vasculature of the patient. During removal of mesh basket 210 and microcatheter 230, embolus 120 is trapped within mesh basket 210 and withdrawn from vessel 110. In some embodiments, a foreign body is the target of removal. The foreign body can comprise, for example, a microcoil, a medical device, a kidney stone, and/or a gallstone.
According to embodiments, microcatheter 230 length and diameter are suitable for inserting into a human patient and capable of reaching a target embolus in the region above the subclavian and common carotid arteries. For example, according to embodiments, microcatheter 230 is about 150 cm long; microcatheter has a proximal segment (at a control end of microcatheter 230) that is about 115 cm long with an outer diameter of about 3.5 French and a distal segment (at a deployment end of microcatheter 230) is about 35 cm with an outer diameter of about 2.7 French. The inventors contemplate, according to embodiments a gradual decrease or stepwise in the outer diameter dimension as a function of the distal distance from proximal segment, according to embodiments. For example, proximal segment is 3.5 French at the most proximal end and distal segment is 2.7 French at the most distal end. Disposed between is a segment having one or more intermediate outer diameters between 3.5 French and 2.7 French, such as 3.2 French and 3.0 French. The inner diameter of microcatheter 230 is 0.012 to 0.029 inches, according to embodiments, which allows microcatheter to be inserted along a preinserted guidewire or used to infuse therapeutic agents. According to embodiments, the performance of microcatheter 230 is comparable to standard microcatheters 230 and is designed to track over a guidewire through the neurovasculature.
As illustrated by embodiments in
Alternately and as illustrated according to embodiments in
In some embodiments, the embolus capture device/basket 200 has radiopacity at a distal end of the device. The radiopacity may comprise at least a peg, selected from the group consisting of platinum and gold, the peg being pressed into pre-laser cut apertures at a distal end of the mesh basket.
If reperfusion is not successful to a desired degree, then embolus capture device/basket 200 is inserted through the microcatheter as described herein and deployed distal to the embolus 120. For example, creating a channel for flow ideally includes making a vessel at least about halfway patent, or 50% of diameter of a vessel being open. According to embodiments, the channel created may be a cerebral equivalent of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 0, TIMI 1, or TIMI 2, TIMI 3, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) and TICI 3. In these cases, blood flow is not accomplished to a desired degree. It is therefore desirable to remove the entire embolus. Thus, after embolus capture device/basket 200 is deployed distal to the embolus, it is retreated proximal until embolus 120 is substantially inside of mesh basket 210 in operation 512. Thereafter, mesh basket 210, embolus 120, and microcatheter 230 are removed.
The embolus capture devices of the present invention may be designed for over the wire deployment or rapid exchange deployment, according to embodiments.
Expressly incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein are U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,928,260 and 5,972,019 along with U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,147,655; 7,160,317; 7,172,575; 7,175,607; and 7,201,770.
As excerpted from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/015,154, filed Dec. 19, 2007, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference,
In one embodiment, ischemic stroke reperfusion or clot capture is performed by a reperfusion device or embolus capture device comprising a NiTi cut tube.
One embodiment for ischemic stroke clot retrieval includes an eccentric design. This embodiment addresses the problem during clot removal of the thrombectomy device being forced off-center because of microcatheter positioning after the microcatheter/guidewire passes the embolus. This “off-centering” causes the device to miss the embolus when pulled proximal to attempt to capture it or fragmenting will occur because the device will shave the embolus. In some embodiments, an off center delivery system is used to capture the embolus. In some embodiments, the struts are designed or favored to the periphery of the artery as opposed to the center of the artery. In some embodiments, the struts are designed to accumulate in 270 degrees of the thrombectomy device allowing open space for the embolus to fall into. By making the attachment point off-center, the open area is increased. By making the device off-center from the point of attachment to the delivery system, the device must increase the chance of capturing the embolus, which is also off-center from the microcatheter.
The chart below illustrates several ischemic stroke delivery system assembly embodiment options:
In some embodiments, the delivery systems maintain an outer diameter at the solder joint of 0.024″ max. In some embodiments, the PET heat shrink is installed over the distal 45 cm of the delivery device. In some embodiments, the distal tip of the delivery system is trimmed after installation of the PET heat shrink. In some embodiments, the distal and proximal ends of the delivery system are deburred. In some embodiments, the delivery systems must accept a 0.010″ guidewire.
The chart below illustrates dimensions for embodiments of the hypotube assembly, or delivery system.
The embodiments disclosed in the tables above accept a 0.010 G.W. (guidewire) straight. In some embodiments, the distal tip of the hypotube 712 is ground (e.g., to 0.0175″) to accept the inner diameter (e.g., 0.015″) of the ribbon coil 713. The distal tip of the hypotube 712 is soldered to the proximate tip of the ribbon coil 713. The PET 714 is cut to 45 cm, the heat shrink is heated to 400 degrees Fahrenheit, and restrained while heated.
A study was performed to evaluate in-vitro tracking of embodiments of delivery system. The testing equipment included: a FlowTek A201 with stroke model, a 5F CORDIS® ENVOY™ MPD guide catheter, a 135 cm×0.027″ inner diameter CORDIS® MASS TRANSIT™ microcatheter, and a 0.010 diameter×200 cm length TRANSEND® guidewire. The study used the following numbered scoring system: (1) pass with no friction at all; (2) pass with acceptable friction; (3) pass with some friction; (4) pass with difficulty; (5) can't pass.
The following notes were taken from the study regarding guidewire tracking. Design 1 passed fine until the PCOM segment with a score of 4. Design 2 experienced some friction requiring 300 cm of exchange wire with a score of ¾. Design 4 scored a 5 at curve 4. Design 5 scored a 4 generally. Designs 3 and 4 had a 0.0155″ inner diameter and designs 1 and 2 had a 0.014″ inner diameter. Design 5 had a 0.002″×0.010″×0.018″ hypotube ribbon coil.
Strut thicknesses for the recanalization or reperfusion devices described herein can include 0.0040″, 0.0025″, 0.0020″, and 0.0009″. The strut thicknesses may vary. The devices may be used for reperfusion and may be tethered. The devices may or may not be recapturable and may or may not include markers.
In some embodiments, the devices described herein are be used for clot removal and comprise a clot basket or spiral basket. In one embodiment, the clot removal device comprises a woven retrieval basket. The woven retrieval basket may include features such as an over the wire design, low porosity fine wires in the basket area to support a clot (wire dia: 0.035 mm and 56-97 pics/cm), or thicker wires that open the basket and give it tensile strength (wire dia: 0.076 mm). The woven retrieval basket may also be fully automatable.
In another embodiment, a reperfusion catheter device includes a nitinol braid. In one embodiment, the braid includes 24 strands with a wire size of 0.076 mm, a braid angle of 42 degrees, an expanded diameter of 3.5 mm, and a collapsed diameter of approximately 0.030″. Other disclosure can be found in U.S. Provisional No. 61/015,154, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
As excerpted from U.S. Provisional No. 61/057,613 filed May 30, 2008, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference, devices and methods for restoring blood flow and embolus removal during acute ischemic stroke are provided.
In accordance with several embodiments, many of the positives of stenting can be combined with revascularization/reperfusion using devices effective to impact and remove embolus. This trend now applies in the brain, and promises dramatic improvements in therapies and treatments.
The pathological course of a blood vessel that is blocked is a gradual progression from reversible ischemia to irreversible infarction (cell death). A stroke is often referred to as a “brain attack” and occurs when a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked or ruptures. An ischemic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked. Ischemic strokes comprise about 78% of all strokes. A hemorrhagic stroke, which account for the remaining 22% of strokes, occurs when a blood vessel in the brain ruptures. Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States, behind heart disease and cancer and is the leading cause of severe, long-term disability. Each year roughly 700,000 Americans experience a new or recurrent stroke. Stroke is the number one cause of inpatient Medicare reimbursement for long-term adult care. Total stroke costs now exceed $45 billion per year in US healthcare dollars.
Viable tissue that surrounds a central core of infarction has consistently been demonstrated in animal models to be salvageable if blood flow can be restored within a time window of several hours. Data from human studies with surrogate measurements of cell viability tended to support this hypothesis. Thus, current treatment strategy for ischemic stroke is based on an urgent restoration of blood flow to the ischemic tissue within the tolerance time window to prevent the permanent loss of brain cells, leading to improved outcome for the patient.
According to the instant disclosure, if autolysis is not occurring then capture of the embolus/blood clot in its entirety without fragmenting the embolus and removal of the embolus/blood clot from the body without creating a new stroke in a new territory is performed.
According to some embodiments, the system will allow maintained arterial access to the treatment site and provide greater support to the arterial tree by being either over-the-wire (OTW) or rapid exchange (RX). This feature will enable the embolus/blood clot to be securely captured and removed by providing support within the vessel. The OTW or RX support provided will prevent the proximal vessel from buckling or kinking during tensioning upon embolus removal. Buckling or kinking of the vessel causes the proximal vessel orifice to ovalize, thereby stripping the embolus from the capture device.
In some embodiments, emboli can be removed while reperfusion is taking place using a variety of devices in the neural space.
Using everted basket-like members and everted stent-like members, emboli can be removed without compromising access, as they become enmeshed with the devices and can be removed without vessel damage.
In one embodiment, an occluded artery, for example, at the MCA/ACA bifurcation is accessed with a microcatheter, then a clot is accessed using the subject reperfusion/clot removal device, allowing for reperfusion by the reperfusion/clot removal device.
In one embodiment, the reperfusion/clot removal device engages the clot by impacting the same. The nature of the open-cell structure of the device grabs the clot, which is then slowly pulled back until it can be drawn into the carotid siphon and then removed into the cavernous carotid, then the common carotid and eventually removed from the body.
Those skilled in the art readily understand how this procedure applies to other neuro-vessels.
A study was performed to evaluate swine blood for clotting characteristics under certain handling conditions. The materials used in the test included: (1) 1 liter of pig blood (no anti-coagulant), (2) Pyrex® glassware, (3) Clorox® bleach, (4) syringes, and (5) saline consisting of a multi-purpose no rub isotonic solution, (In accordance with one embodiment, the testing procedure was performed as follows: (1) pour pig blood into glassware, (2) allow pig blood to sit for 90 minutes, (3) wash the pig blood with saline, (4) allow to sit for 60 minutes, (5) remove “white” clot with cutting tools, (6) wash thoroughly with saline, and (7) measure clot dimensions. The dimensions of the clot removed from the pig blood had a length of 50 mm and a diameter ranging from 7 to 10 mm. Other disclosure can be found in U.S. Provisional No. 61/057,613, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
As excerpted from U.S. application Ser. No. 12/123,390, filed Apr. 19, 2008 and from U.S. Provisional No. 60/980,736, filed Oct. 17, 2007, which are expressly incorporated herein by reference,
According to embodiments and as illustrated in
According to some examples of the instant system during shipping of catheter-revascularization system 900, shipping lock (not shown) is installed between delivery handle 906 and winged apparatus 908 to prevent deployment and premature extension of revascularization device 924 (see
According to embodiments, agent delivery device 930 provides a conduit in fluid communication with the lumen of the catheter-based revascularization system 900 enabling users of the system to deliver agents through catheter-revascularization system 900 directly to the location of the embolus. The instant revascularization system delivery device may be made from materials known to artisans, including stainless steel hypotube, stainless steel coil, polymer jackets, and/or radiopaque jackets. In one embodiment, the revascularization systems comprise a plurality of apertures 918 allowing infusable lytic agents to exit radially and distally into at least a subject embolus when transmitted through agent delivery device which is in fluid communication therewith. The revascularization systems according to several embodiments herein can comprise radiopacity for imaging purposes.
Accordingly, luer connector 932 or a functional equivalent provides sterile access to the lumen of catheter-based revascularization system 900 to effect delivery of a chosen agent. Artisans will understand that revascularization devices of the present invention include embodiments made essentially of nitinol or spring tempered stainless steel. Revascularization devices likewise may be coated or covered with therapeutic substances in pharmacologically effective amounts or lubricious materials. According to embodiments, coatings include nimodipine, vasodialators, sirolamus, and paclitaxel. Additionally, at least heparin and other coating materials of pharmaceutical nature may be used.
Deployment end 904 of catheter-based revascularization system 900 comprises proximal segment 910 and distal segment 920. Proximal segment 910, according to embodiments, houses distal segment 920 and comprises outer catheter 912 that is of a suitable length and diameter for deployment into the blood vessel of the neck, head, and cerebral vasculature. For example in some embodiments, proximal segment 910 is from at least about 100 cm to approximately 115 cm long with an outer diameter of at least about 2.5 French to about 4 French.
Referring also to
Referring to
As known to artisans, revascularization device 924 may be coated or covered with substances imparting lubricous characteristics or therapeutic substances, as desired. Naturally, the expandable mesh design of revascularization device 924 must be a pattern whereby when revascularization device 924 is retracted, it is able to fully retract into inner catheter 922. The nature of the cell type likewise changes with respect to the embodiment used, and is often determined based upon nature of the clot.
Catheter-revascularization system 900 is deployed through a patient's blood vessels. Once the user of catheter-revascularization system 900 determines that the embolus to be addressed is crossed, as known and understood well by artisans, revascularization device 924 is deployed by first positioning outer catheter 912 in a location immediately distal to the embolus.
Then, to revascularize/reperfuse the occluded blood vessel, distal catheter 920 is deployed in a location whereby revascularization device 924 expands at the location of the embolus, as illustrated by
As discussed above and claimed below, creating a channel for flow ideally includes making a vessel at least about halfway-patent, or 50% of diameter of a vessel being open. According to other embodiments, the channel created may be a cerebral equivalent of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction TIMI 1, TIMI 2, or TIMI 3.
Restoration of blood flow may act as a natural lytic agent and many emboli may begin to dissolve. Revascularization device 924 is designed, according to embodiments, to radially filter larger pieces of the dissolving embolus and prevent them from traveling distal to the device and potentially causing occlusion in another location. Because the revascularization device provides continuous radial pressure at the location of the obstruction, as the embolus dissolves, the blood flow continues to increase.
After the embolus is lysed, revascularization device 924 is sheathed into outer catheter 912 and removed from the body. According to embodiments, larger pieces of the thrombus may be retracted with revascularization device 924 after being captured in the radial filtering process. According to embodiments, revascularization device 924 may be detachable whereby the revascularization device 924 may detach from catheter-based revascularization system 900 if it is determined that revascularization device 924 should remain in the patient. As discussed above and as illustrated in
As excerpted from U.S. Provisional No. 60/987,384, filed Nov. 12, 2007, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference,
In one embodiment, a method is disclosed comprising providing a microcatheter having at least a distal segment, proximal segment, and active segment for use above the subclavian artery and common carotid artery, wherein the active segment is radially expandable.
In one embodiment, a catheter system for use above the juncture of the subclavian artery and common carotid artery is provided, although other uses are equally appropriate as determined by qualified medical personnel and may be introduced via a guidewire. The device operates as a standard microcatheter during introduction into a patient. The distal segment, which is remotely deployable, has attached to it an active segment that expands radially to reperfuse emboli. After reperfusion, the active segment is returned to its configuration prior to expansion and the entire microcatheter system is removed.
According to embodiments and as illustrated by an exemplary embodiment in
According to embodiments, catheter length and diameter are suitable for inserting into a human patient and capable of reaching a target embolus in the region above the subclavian and common carotid arteries. For example, according to embodiments, microcatheter 1100 is about 150 cm long; proximal segment 1102 is about 115 cm with an outer diameter of about 4 French and distal segment 1104 is about 35 cm with an outer diameter of about 2.7 French. In one embodiment, the microcatheter 1100 is 135 cm long, proximal segment 1102 is 90 cm long, and distal segment 1104 is 45 cm long. In one embodiment, the microcatheter 1100 has an inner diameter of 0.012″. The inventors contemplate, according to embodiments a gradual decrease or stepwise in the outer diameter dimension as a function of the distal distance from proximal segment 1102, according to embodiments. For example, proximal segment 1102 is 4 French at the most proximal end and distal segment 1104 is 2.7 French at the most distal end. Disposed between is a segment having one or more intermediate outer diameters between 4 French and 2.7 French, such as 3.4 French and 3.0 French (see
According to embodiments, microcatheter 1100 is designed to follow a path of least resistance through a thrombus. Guidewire inserted through a thrombus tends to follow the path of least resistance through the softest parts of each thrombus. When microcatheter 1100 is inserted, it likewise follows this path of least resistance. As blood flow is restored, the natural lytic action further helps to break up the thrombus.
According to embodiments, active segment 1110 comprises a radially expandable woven mesh or coil. The mesh may be made from materials well known and understood by artisans, including polymers, fluoropolymers, nitinol, stainless steel, vectran, or kevlar. Other biocompatible materials that may be woven or coiled are similarly contemplated. Active segment 1110 is, according to embodiments, 5 mm to 50 mm in length when expanded and is designed to substantially return to its preexpansion configuration for removal of microcatheter after reperfusion. In one embodiment, active segment 1110 is 15 mm long.
As indicated above, active segment 1110 comprises a mesh. The mesh comprises a plurality of individual units, having a uniform size or spacing geometry or a variable size or spacing geometry. According to embodiments where the size or spacing geometry is variable, smaller size or spacing geometry is used to provide a tight mesh for expanding a channel through the thrombus. Larger size or spacing geometry units allow from blood flow through active segment 1110. In one embodiment, active segment 1110 comprises a woven polymer mesh that is heparin coated. In one embodiment, active segment 1110 has a suitable porosity to permit blood flow when expanded. In one embodiment, releasing expansion of active segment 1110 will trap thrombus in the mesh.
According to embodiments, variable cell size or spacing geometry is accomplished with points where the braid crosses over fixed filaments (PICS). Thus, the cell size or spacing geometry varies by varying the density of the braid. Where high radial force is needed to open a channel in an embolus, for example, the filaments of the mesh are denser and therefore cross each other more often, yielding small cell size or spacing geometry that leads to the application of greater radial force when the mesh expands. Where perfusion is desired, the PICS are less dense and the resulting cell size or spacing geometry is increased. Additionally, drug delivery through microcatheter will be more effective in mesh configurations having a large size or spacing geometry.
Active segment 1110 may be coated or covered with substances, such as lubricious agents or pharmacologically active agents, according to embodiments. For example, active segment 1110 may be covered with heparin or other agents that are used in clot therapy, such as those that aid in dissolving clots or mitigating vasospasms.
According to similar embodiments, therapeutic agents are deployable through the lumen of microcatheter 1100, thereby allowing users of microcatheter 1100 to determine on a case-by-case basis whether to administer an agent. Accordingly, the braid/geometry of active segment 1110 is porous to allow the agent to pass from lumen of microcatheter 1100 into the blood vessel at the site of an embolus, for example.
Activation member 1120, according to embodiments, is a wire that connects proximal segment 1102 to distal segment 1104 and allows a user of microcatheter 1100 to deploy active segment 1110. Accordingly, activation member 1120 is made from stainless steel wire or braid, composites polymers and metal braids, ribbon or wire coils. According to embodiments, activation member 1120 comprises a hollow lumen that slidably moves over a guidewire to insert microcatheter 1100.
When active segment 1110 is expanded in a vessel, the radial expansion causes a channel to be formed in a thrombus for restored blood flow past the occlusion and thereby reperfuse the vessel. Activation of active segment 1110 is accomplished by mechanical methods, such as with activation member 1120 or by using liner of microcatheter 1110. Use of the liner is accomplished by leaving the liner unfused with active segment 1110.
For example, activation member 1120 fuses to the distal-most portion of activation segment 1110. According to embodiments, activation segment 1110 is heat set into a native confirmation in an expanded state. When activation member 1120 tensions active segment 1110, its confirmation changes from an expanded state into a deliverable state. Once delivered to the site of an embolus, activation member 1120 is adjusted to allow active segment 1110 to relax and thereby expand. According to similar embodiments, active segment 1110 is heat set into a native unexpanded confirmation. Activation member 1120 is used to tension active segment 1110 when delivered to the site of an embolus, thereby expanding it.
Other activation methods include electrical, chemical, and thermal activators, as is known and understood by artisans. Hydraulic activation may be accomplished with a balloon in the interior of the catheter that is filled with a fluid, thereby expanding the balloon, which expands active segment.
According to embodiments illustrated in
Once activated, active segment 1110 allows blood to flow around microcatheter 1100 and active segment 1110 to create therapeutic benefits associated with reperfusion. For example and according to embodiments, the portions of distal segment 1104 immediately proximal and distal to active segment 1110 may have a diameter of 2.0 French to 3.0 French and have installed therein revascularization ports 1112, as shown in
According to embodiments, a filter may be placed distal of active segment to prevent embolus pieces detached in the reperfusion process from escaping and causing distal occlusions. Accordingly, active segment is designed to capture pieces of embolus during the reperfusion processes. These pieces are captured within active segment 1110 when active segment 1110 is returned to its initial confirmation after expansion.
In some embodiments, active segment 1110 comprises an infusable microwire with an integrated filter as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the rapid reperfusion device comprises an infusable temporary stent as illustrated in
As shown in
According to embodiments illustrated in
While the apparatus and method have been described in terms of what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention need not be limited to the disclosed embodiments. It is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the claims, the scope of which should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar structures. The present invention includes any and all embodiments of the following claims.
It should also be understood that a variety of changes may be made without departing from the essence of the invention. Such changes are also implicitly included in the description. They still fall within the scope of this invention. It should be understood that this invention is intended to yield a patent covering numerous aspects of the invention both independently and as an overall system and in both method and apparatus modes.
Further, each of the various elements of the invention and claims may also be achieved in a variety of manners. This invention should be understood to encompass each such variation, be it a variation of an embodiment of any apparatus embodiment, a method or process embodiment, or even merely a variation of any element of these.
Particularly, it should be understood that as the invention relates to elements of the invention, the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms or method terms—even if only the function or result is the same.
Such equivalent, broader, or even more generic terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this invention is entitled.
It should be understood that all actions may be expressed as a means for taking that action or as an element which causes that action.
Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a invention of the action which that physical element facilitates.
Any patents, publications, or other references mentioned in this application for patent are hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, as to each term used it should be understood that unless its utilization in this application is inconsistent with such interpretation common dictionary definitions should be understood as incorporated for each term and all definitions, alternative terms, and synonyms such as contained in at least one of a standard technical dictionary recognized by artisans and the Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, latest edition are hereby incorporated by reference.
Finally, all referenced listed in the Information Invention Statement or other information statement filed with the application are hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference; however, as to each of the above, to the extent that such information or statements incorporated by reference might be considered inconsistent with the patenting of this/these invention(s), such statements are expressly not to be considered as made by the applicant(s).
In this regard it should be understood that for practical reasons and so as to avoid adding potentially hundreds of claims, the applicant has presented claims with initial dependencies only.
Support should be understood to exist to the degree required under new matter laws—including but not limited to United States Patent Law 35 USC 132 or other such laws—to permit the addition of any of the various dependencies or other elements presented under one independent claim or concept as dependencies or elements under any other independent claim or concept.
To the extent that insubstantial substitutes are made, to the extent that the applicant did not in fact draft any claim so as to literally encompass any particular embodiment, and to the extent otherwise applicable, the applicant should not be understood to have in any way intended to or actually relinquished such coverage as the applicant simply may not have been able to anticipate all eventualities; one skilled in the art, should not be reasonably expected to have drafted a claim that would have literally encompassed such alternative embodiments.
Further, the use of the transitional phrase “comprising” is used to maintain the “open-end” claims herein, according to traditional claim interpretation. Thus, unless the context requires otherwise, it should be understood that the term comprise or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, are intended to imply the inclusion of a stated element or step or group of elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other element or step or group of elements or steps.
Such terms should be interpreted in their most expansive forms so as to afford the applicant the broadest coverage legally permissible.
This application claims the Paris Convention Priority of and fully incorporates by reference, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/980,736, filed on Oct. 17, 2007; Application Ser. No. 60/987,384, filed on Nov. 12, 2007; Application Ser. No. 61/015,154, filed on Dec. 19, 2007; Application Ser. No. 61/044,392, filed on Apr. 11, 2008; Application Ser. No. 61/057,613, filed on May 30, 2008; and U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/123,390, filed on May 19, 2008 by the present and the instant assignee.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2709999 | Nagel | Jun 1955 | A |
3174851 | Buehler et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3351463 | Rozner et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3506171 | Rupert | Apr 1970 | A |
3753700 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4650466 | Luther | Mar 1987 | A |
4993481 | Kamimoto et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998539 | Delsanti | Mar 1991 | A |
5035686 | Crittenden et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5057114 | Wittich et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5222964 | Cooper | Jun 1993 | A |
5222971 | Willard et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5275622 | Lazarus et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5312344 | Grinfeld et al. | May 1994 | A |
5327885 | Griffith | Jul 1994 | A |
5344395 | Whalen | Sep 1994 | A |
5370653 | Cragg | Dec 1994 | A |
5425739 | Jessen | Jun 1995 | A |
5449372 | Schmaltz | Sep 1995 | A |
5456667 | Ham et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5527282 | Segal | Jun 1996 | A |
5643309 | Myler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649906 | Gory et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653743 | Martin | Aug 1997 | A |
5681336 | Clement et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683449 | Marcade | Nov 1997 | A |
5695469 | Segal | Dec 1997 | A |
5718724 | Goicoechea et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5792157 | Mische | Aug 1998 | A |
5795322 | Boudewijn | Aug 1998 | A |
5800457 | Gelbfish | Sep 1998 | A |
5800519 | Sandock | Sep 1998 | A |
5827324 | Cassell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5853419 | Imran | Dec 1998 | A |
5916235 | Gugliemlim | Jun 1999 | A |
5922019 | Hankh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928260 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5938671 | Katoh | Aug 1999 | A |
5938697 | Killion et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941895 | Myler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941896 | Kerr | Aug 1999 | A |
5947995 | Samuels | Sep 1999 | A |
5951599 | McCrory | Sep 1999 | A |
5961547 | Razavi | Oct 1999 | A |
5968013 | Smith et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972016 | Morales | Oct 1999 | A |
5972019 | Engelson | Oct 1999 | A |
5972219 | Habets | Oct 1999 | A |
5976120 | Chow et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980514 | Kupiecki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001118 | Daniel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010449 | Selmon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6010498 | Guglielmi | Jan 2000 | A |
6010521 | Lee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015424 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051020 | Goicoechea et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063070 | Eder | May 2000 | A |
6063104 | Villar et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063111 | Hieshima et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066149 | Samson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066158 | Engelson | May 2000 | A |
6093199 | Brown et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096034 | Kupiecki et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106548 | Roubin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117167 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123115 | Greenhalgh | Sep 2000 | A |
6136006 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146396 | Konya et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159238 | Killion et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159239 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2000 | A |
6164339 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2000 | A |
6168592 | Kupiecki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6168604 | Cano | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190358 | Fitzmaurice | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192944 | Greenhalgh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193708 | Ken et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210364 | Anderson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217609 | Haverkost | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221096 | Aiba et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231598 | Berry et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238430 | Klumb et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254628 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258115 | Dubrul | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280413 | Clark et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283940 | Mullholland | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283992 | Hankh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290720 | Khosravi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305436 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306141 | Jervis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322585 | Khosravi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325815 | Kusleika et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325820 | Khosravi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325822 | Chouinard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344041 | Kupiecki et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6383205 | Samson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390993 | Cornish et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402771 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6454780 | Wallace | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458139 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468301 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475236 | Roubin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475237 | Drasler et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485500 | Kokish | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485509 | Killion et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6537294 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551341 | Boylan et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551342 | Shen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553810 | Webb et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554842 | Heuser et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554856 | Doorly et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558405 | McInnes | May 2003 | B1 |
6562066 | Martin | May 2003 | B1 |
6569179 | Teoh et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569193 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575997 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589265 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592607 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592615 | Marcade et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605057 | Fitzmaurice | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610077 | Hancock et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616617 | Ferrera et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629953 | Boyd | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632241 | Hancock et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635081 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638294 | Palmer | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641590 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652505 | Tsugita | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652576 | Stalker | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660021 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663607 | Slaikeu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666829 | Cornish et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669723 | Killion et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673025 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685722 | Rosenbluth | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6685738 | Chouinard et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695813 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702843 | Brown et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709440 | Callol et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716178 | Kilpatrick et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6723112 | Ho et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730104 | Sepetka et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6733519 | Lashinski | May 2004 | B2 |
6746468 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764506 | Roubin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773454 | Wholey et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790237 | Stinson | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795979 | Fournier | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802851 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818015 | Hankh et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821291 | Bolea et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824558 | Parodi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833003 | Jones et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840958 | Nunez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6881220 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893413 | Martin | May 2005 | B2 |
6913612 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6949620 | Aida et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953472 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955685 | Escamilla et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960227 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6991641 | Diaz et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994723 | McMahon | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7001422 | Escamilla et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004954 | Voss | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7004955 | Shen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004956 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018401 | Hyodoh et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7029688 | Hubbell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037329 | Martin | May 2006 | B2 |
7041116 | Goto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048014 | Hyodoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056328 | Arnott | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7056336 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060091 | Killion et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7089218 | Visel | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112217 | Kugler et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7118600 | Dua et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125419 | Sequin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128736 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7144421 | Carpenter et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147655 | Chermoni | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147660 | Chobotov et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156869 | Pacetti | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7160317 | McHale | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169165 | Belef et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172575 | El-Nounou | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7172617 | Colgan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175607 | Lim | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7179273 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7179284 | Khosravi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201769 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201770 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223284 | Khosravi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238197 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7240516 | Pryor | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7241301 | Thramann et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261727 | Thielen | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279003 | Berra et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279292 | Imam et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285126 | Sepetka et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294147 | Hartley | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300458 | Henkes et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306619 | Palmer | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7309345 | Wallace | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309351 | Escamilla | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7323000 | Monstdt et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323005 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323006 | Andreas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326240 | Caro et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7344549 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344550 | Carrison et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344556 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351255 | Andreas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7354455 | Stinson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402169 | Killion et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407509 | Greenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7435254 | Chouinard et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7438720 | Shaked | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455646 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473272 | Pryor | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7494474 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7549974 | Nayak | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7691122 | Dieck et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727242 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7727243 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749243 | Phung et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780694 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7833240 | Okushi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7972342 | Gandhi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8029530 | Gesswein et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052640 | Fiorella et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062307 | Sepetka et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066757 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070791 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088140 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100918 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100935 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105333 | Sepetka et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8197493 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010000797 | Mazzocchi | May 2001 | A1 |
20010004705 | Killion et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010013 | Cox et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010031981 | Evans et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034531 | Ho et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044633 | Klint | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044647 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047202 | Slaikeu et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051823 | Khosravi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004667 | Adams et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004681 | Teoh et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007210 | Chouinard et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016564 | Courtney et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016624 | Patterson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032479 | Hankh et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038142 | Khosravi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038146 | Harry | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052643 | Wholey et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068968 | Hupp | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072790 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087209 | Edwin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091355 | Hayden | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095141 | Belef | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020143387 | Soetikno et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161377 | Rabkin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169458 | Connors | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183831 | Rolando et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198588 | Armstrong et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004536 | Boylan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023230 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023299 | Amplatz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032941 | Boyle | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032977 | Brady | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040771 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040772 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055440 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055451 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074056 | Killion et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078605 | Bashiri et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097114 | Ouriel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105484 | Boyle | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125791 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125798 | Martin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130719 | Martin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139796 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139803 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149475 | Hyodoh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153944 | Phung et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176914 | Rabkin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195554 | Shen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199921 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204202 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040002752 | Griffin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006306 | Evans et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006370 | Tsugita | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006381 | Sequin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019322 | Hoffmann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030378 | Khosravi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034386 | Fulton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039412 | Isshiki et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049258 | Khosravi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054367 | Jimenez et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059259 | Cornish et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059407 | Escamilla et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068288 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073300 | Chouinard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078071 | Escamilla et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079429 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088002 | Boyle | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102838 | Killion et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106979 | Goicoechea et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114912 | Okamoto et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117003 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147939 | Rabkin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153117 | Clubb et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158307 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158312 | Chouinard et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186562 | Cox | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193208 | Talpade et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193246 | Ferrera | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199201 | Kellett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215312 | Andreas | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215319 | Berra et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249439 | Richter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254628 | Nazzaro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260385 | Jones et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033334 | Santra et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033349 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033409 | Burke et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038447 | Huffmaster | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038468 | Panetta et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038496 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049676 | Nazzaro et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055047 | Greenhalgh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060017 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075715 | Borges et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080480 | Bolea et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090857 | Kusleika et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090888 | Hines et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096726 | Sequin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102018 | Carpenter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107823 | Leone et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119684 | Guterman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125023 | Bates | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126979 | Lowe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131449 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131515 | Cully et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131516 | Greenhalgh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159774 | Belef | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177228 | Solem et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187612 | Edwin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192661 | Griffen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209673 | Shaked | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209675 | Ton et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209678 | Henkes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216050 | Sepetka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222583 | Cano | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222607 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267570 | Shadduck | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277978 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283166 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020285 | Niermann | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020321 | Parker | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025845 | Escamilla et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025850 | Feller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030865 | Balg | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036281 | Patterson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052816 | Bates et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058833 | VanCamp | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058836 | Bose et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058838 | Bose et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074480 | Bales et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089703 | Escamilla et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100663 | Palmer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106421 | Teoh | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106448 | Shaked | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122643 | Wasicek | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122685 | Bonsignore et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135947 | Soltesz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142841 | Khosravi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142849 | Killion et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060195172 | Luo et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200048 | Furst | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200221 | Malewicz | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224180 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229645 | Bonnette et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259119 | Rucker | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265054 | Greenhalgh et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271090 | Shaked et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276883 | Greenberg et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282116 | Lowe et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287701 | Pal | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287704 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032852 | Machek et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043424 | Pryor | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043425 | Hartley et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055299 | Ishimaru | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055358 | Krolik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055360 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055365 | Greenberg et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060945 | Gilson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067011 | Krolik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073376 | Krolik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088387 | Eskridge et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100425 | Sequin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118205 | Davidson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123972 | Greenberg et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135826 | Zaver et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135888 | Khosravi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141036 | Gorrochategui Barrueta et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142896 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156170 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156228 | Majercak et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162109 | Davila et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191866 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191884 | Eskridge et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191924 | Rudakov | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198028 | Miloslavski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198030 | Martin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198075 | Levy | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203452 | Mehta | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203559 | Freudenthal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208367 | Fiorella et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208371 | French et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219579 | Paul | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219621 | Hartley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225794 | Thramann et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233236 | Pryor | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250040 | Provost et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266542 | Melsheimer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270932 | Headley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288034 | MacCollum et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288037 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288080 | Maccollum et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288083 | Hines | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299503 | Berra et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001333 | Kleine et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015558 | Harlan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015682 | Majercak et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033528 | Satasiya et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039926 | Majercak et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039930 | Jones et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045995 | Guterman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046064 | Sequin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046072 | Laborde et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051803 | Monjtadt | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058724 | Wallace | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071178 | Greenland et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077175 | Palmer | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082159 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086196 | Truckai et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091231 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097495 | Feller et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103477 | Jones | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103585 | Monstadt | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109063 | Hancock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109067 | Caro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114445 | Melsheimer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125855 | Henkes et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140107 | Bei | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140181 | Reynolds | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147100 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161903 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161936 | Feller et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167708 | Molland et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195140 | Myla | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200946 | Braun et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208245 | Hoffman | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208319 | Rabkin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221554 | O'Connor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221600 | Dieck et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221664 | Bales et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221671 | Chouinard et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228216 | Strauss et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234795 | Snow et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243229 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243232 | Hegg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247943 | Lanza et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249598 | Sherry | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255678 | Cully et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262506 | Griffin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262528 | Martin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262532 | Martin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262592 | Jordan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262952 | Channell | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269774 | Garcia et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269868 | Bei | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275497 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080275498 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080275536 | Zarins et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281302 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281350 | Sepetka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281393 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281397 | Killion et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281403 | Kavteladze | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306503 | Que et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306504 | Win et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312732 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319525 | Tieu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319533 | Lehe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018633 | Lindquist et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018634 | State | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018640 | State | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024157 | Anukhin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025820 | Adams | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030502 | Sun et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036968 | Hepworth et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036977 | Rassat et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062726 | Ford et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062773 | Cornish et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062834 | Moftakhar et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068097 | Sevrain | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069828 | Martin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069836 | Labdag et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076450 | Caizza et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082800 | Janardhan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093822 | Ducharme | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105644 | Leonard et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105722 | Fulkerson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105737 | Fulkerson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105747 | Chanduszko et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125053 | Ferrera et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090192455 | Ferrera et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240213 | Miyagawa et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240238 | Grodrian et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090292297 | Ferrera | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299393 | Martin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022951 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100087908 | Hilaire et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100106 | Ferrera | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114017 | Lenker et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114135 | Wilson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137892 | Krolik et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152766 | Dieck et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174309 | Fulkerson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217187 | Fulkerson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100256600 | Ferrera | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268264 | Bonnette | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100299911 | Gianotti et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318097 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009875 | Grandfield et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009941 | Grandfield et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060212 | Slee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110152920 | Eckhouse et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160742 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160757 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160760 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160761 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160763 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166586 | Sepetka et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172699 | Miller et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184456 | Grandfield et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190797 | Fulkerson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202088 | Eckhouse et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238106 | Ferrera et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257675 | Mackiewicz | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270178 | Fiorella et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288572 | Martin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301686 | Bowman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319917 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016396 | Dehnad | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016406 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022576 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022581 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022634 | Kusleika et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035648 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035650 | Linder et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041411 | Horton et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041449 | Eckhouse et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041459 | Fiorella et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041460 | Ferrera et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041464 | Monetti et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041474 | Eckhouse et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041475 | Ferrera et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046686 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120065660 | Ferrera et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071964 | Cattaneo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078140 | Nita | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078285 | Griffin | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089216 | Rapaport et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116443 | Ferrera et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120265238 | Hopkins et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0321912 | Jun 1989 | EP |
820729 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1000590 | May 2000 | EP |
1437097 | Jul 2004 | EP |
2257248 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2301450 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2417919 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2003-033359 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2006-094876 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007-222658 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-236471 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO-9403127 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO9855173 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9944542 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO0032265 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0053120 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0108743 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0136034 | May 2001 | WO |
WO0145569 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO03011188 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO03017823 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2007089897 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007121005 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008117256 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008117257 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2008124728 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009105710 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2009124288 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO2009126747 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO2010010545 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010023671 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2010046897 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010049121 | May 2010 | WO |
WO2010062363 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2010102307 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2010115642 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2010121037 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2010121049 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2011054531 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011095352 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO-2011133486 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO-2011135556 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011144336 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011147567 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012009675 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012025245 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012025247 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
T.W. Duerig, D.E. Tolomeo, M. Wholey, An Overview of Superelastic Stent Design. |
Michael E. Kelly, MD, et al., Recanalization of an Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Using a Self-Expanding, Reconstrainable, Intracranial Microstent as a Temporary Endovascular Bypass; Stroke, Jun. 2008, pp. 1770-1773, vol. 39, issue 6, United States. |
Eric Sauvegeau, MD et al., Middle Cerebral Artery Stenting for Acute Ischemic Stroke After Unsuccessful Merci Retrieval; Neurosurgery (Special Technical Report), Apr. 2007, pp. 701-706, vol. 60, issue 4, United States. |
David M. Pelz, et al., Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2007; Stroke, Jan. 2008, pp. 268-272, vol. 39, issue 1, United States. |
Philippa C. Lavallee, et al., Stent-Assisted Endovascular Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Internal Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion; Stroke, Aug. 2007, pp. 2270-2274, vol. 38, issue 8, United States. |
E.I. Levy et al., Self-Expanding Stents for Recanalization of Acute Cerebrovascular Occlusions; AJNR, May 2007, pp. 816-822, vol. 28, United States. |
Micro Therapeutics, Inc., DBA EV3 Neurovascular, Inc., Solitaire FR Revascularization Device, Instructions for Use, 70494-001 Rev. Mar. 2009. |
Micro Therapeutics, Inc., DBA EV3 Neurovascular, Inc., Fully deployable. Completely retrievable. Solitaire AB, Neurovascular Remodeling Device. |
Robertson, Kathy, Stroke device startup lands National Science Foundation grant, Sacramento Business Journal, Oct. 23, 2009, Sacramento, California, USA. |
Henkes, H. et al., “A Microcatheter-Delivered Highly-Flexible and Fully-Retrievable Stent, Specifically Designed for Intracranial Use,” Interventional Neuroradiology, vol. 9, pp. 391-393 (Dec. 2003). |
Doerfler, A. et al., “A Novel Flexible, Retrievable Endovascular Stent System for Small-Vessel Anatomy: Preliminary In Vivo Data,” Am. J. Neuroradiol. vol. 26, pp. 862-868 (Apr. 2005). |
Liebig, T. et al., “A novel self-expanding fully retrievable intracranial stent (SOLO): experience in nine procedures of stent-assisted aneurysm coil occlusion,” Neuroradiology vol. 48, pp. 471-478 (Jul. 2006). |
Yavuz, K. et al., “Immediate and midterm follow-up results of using an electrodetachable, fully retrievable SOLO stent system in the endovascular coil occlusion of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms,” J. Neurosurg. vol. 107, pp. 49-55 (Jul. 2007). |
“Penumbra, Inc. Enrolls First Patients in Pulse Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Fully Retrievable, Dense Mesh Temporary Stent for Immediate Flow Restoration in Interventional Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment,” Business Wire, Nov. 1, 2010, downloaded at http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20101101006991/en/Penumbra-Enrolls-Patients-PULSE-Clinical-Trial-Evaluate. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/980,736, filed Oct. 17, 2007, Fulkerson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/987,384, filed Nov. 12, 2007, Fulkerson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/015,154, filed Dec. 19, 2007, Ferrera et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/057,613, filed May 30, 2008, Ferrera et al. |
Wakhloo, et al., “Retrievable Closed Cell Intracranial Stent for Foreign Body and Clot Removal,” Neurosurgery, May 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090105722 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60980736 | Oct 2007 | US | |
60987384 | Nov 2007 | US | |
61015154 | Dec 2007 | US | |
61044392 | Apr 2008 | US | |
61057613 | May 2008 | US |