Claims
- 1. A plasma display device having a composite back panel including a metal substrate having a predetermined thermal coefficient of expansion (TCE) and a ceramic barrier rib structure which are co-fired at a predetermined temperature, the ceramic barrier rib structure being composed from:
- a first glass material having a TCE which is less than the TCE of the metal substrate, the first glass being formulated to flow-back at the co-firing temperature; and
- a second glass material having a TCE which is greater than the TCE of the metal substrate, wherein the first and second glass materials are mixed in a proportion to produce a composite ceramic material having a TCE which is substantially equal to the TCE of the metal substrate.
- 2. A plasma display device according to claim 1, wherein:
- the metal substrate is made from titanium;
- the first glass material has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ ZnO 15.00-50.00 MgO 10.00-45.00 BaO 5.00-30.00 SiO.sub.2 10.00-45.00;______________________________________
- the second glass material has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ SiO2 10.00-80.00 B.sub.2 O.sub.3 5.00-60.00 BaO 5.00-30.00 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.00-60.00;______________________________________
- and
- the mixture of the first and second glass materials has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________first glass 99.50-60.00 second glass 0.50-40.00.______________________________________
- 3. A plasma display device according to claim 2, wherein the first glass material has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ ZnO 30.00 MgO 25.00 BaO 20.00 SiO.sub.2 25.00.______________________________________
- 4. A plasma display device according to claim 2, wherein the second glass material has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ SiO.sub.2 19.53 B.sub.2 O.sub.3 17.16 BaO 63.31 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.00.______________________________________
- 5. A plasma display device according to claim 2, wherein the second glass material has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ SiO.sub.2 16.12 B.sub.2 O.sub.3 6.05 BaO 68.76 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 9.07.______________________________________
- 6. A green ceramic tape having defined by percent weight formulation as:
- ______________________________________ glass 1 40.00-70.00 glass 2 1.00-15.00 solvent 10.00-30.00 resin 10.00-40.00______________________________________
- wherein:
- glass 1 has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ ZnO 15.00-50.00 MgO 10.00-45.00 BaO 5.00-30.00 SiO.sub.2 10.00-45.00; and______________________________________
- glass 2 has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ SiO2 10.00-80.00 B.sub.2 O.sub.3 5.00-60.00 BaO 5.00-30.00 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.00-60.00.______________________________________
- 7. A green ceramic tape according to claim 6, wherein the solvent has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ Methyl-ethyl-ketone 46.90 Ethanol 46.90 Fish oil 6.20.______________________________________
- 8. A green ceramic tape according to claim 6, wherein the resin has a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________Methyl-ethyl-ketone 36.00 Ethanol 36.00 butyl benzyl phthalate 11.20 a further resin including a 16.80 terpolymer having butyral, alcohol and acetate groups______________________________________
- 9. A green ceramic tape according to claim 6, further comprising a surfactant combined with the other ingredients in a percent weight range of one-half percent to five percent.
- 10. A green ceramic tape according to claim 6, having a formulation defined by percent weight as:
- ______________________________________ glass 1 57.51 glass 2 6.39 solvent 15.97 resin 17.89 surfactant 2.24.______________________________________
- 11. A green ceramic tape according to claim 6, wherein glass 1 and glass 2 are prepared to have an average particle size greater than 15 .mu.m.
Parent Case Info
This application claims the priority of U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/093,157 entitled EMBOSSED PLASMA DISPLAY BACK PANEL filed on Jul. 17, 1998 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/093,987 entitled EMBOSSED PLASMA DISPLAY file on Jul. 24, 1998.
US Referenced Citations (11)
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry |
B. Mercier, E. Benoit and Y. Blache, "A New Video Storage Architecture For Plasma Display Panels", IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, pp. 121-127, vol. 42, No. 1. Feb. 1996. |
International Search Report corresponding to PCT application PCT/US99/16126. |