This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/692,797, filed Jun. 21, 2005.
The invention generally relates to paper products and more particularly to embossed tissue products exhibiting a high perceived softness.
Tissue products manufactured using wet press technology can be embossed subsequent to creping to improve bulk, appearance and perceived softness. It is known in the art to emboss sheets comprising multiple plies of tissue to increase the surface area of the sheets thereby enhancing their bulk and moisture holding capacity. Tissue products are usually marketed in rolls, containing a specified number of sheets per roll. Tissue embossed in conventional patterns of spot debossments, when packaged in roll form, exhibit a tendency to be non-uniform in appearance often due to uneven buildup of the bosses as the sheet is wound onto the roll, resulting in a ridging effect detracting from the appearance of the rolls.
A tissue product exhibiting improved tactile and visual characteristics is disclosed. The tissue product is defined by a plurality of signature boss groupings, each grouping including a plurality of similarly aligned signature bosses. Major axes of one of the groupings of signature bosses diverge in the clockwise direction from the machine direction of said web, and major axes of another of grouping of signature bosses diverge in the counter-clockwise direction from the machine direction of said web.
One advantage of the present invention is to provide an embossed tissue which avoids buildup and ridging problems while heightening the consumer's perception of softness. The pattern which is formed in the tissue of the present invention may be formed by debossing or embossing. When an emboss pattern is formed, the reverse side of the sheet retains a deboss pattern. The projections which are formed are referred to as bosses. When a deboss pattern is formed, the reverse side of the sheet retains an emboss pattern and the projections are still referred to as bosses. Thus, the methodologies may be interchanged while producing the same product. When the web or sheets are formed into a roll, the tissue is aligned so that the bosses are internal to the roll and the debossed side of the tissue is exposed.
The product according to the present invention may include signature bosses, macro bosses and micro bosses. Signature bosses may be made up of any embossing design. They are most often a design which may be related by consumer perception to the particular manufacturer of the tissue. Macro bosses and micro bosses may assume a variety of different configurations, for example stitch-like bosses and rounded dot-like bosses.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the boss pattern combines relatively shallow micro bosses with deeper defined macro bosses and signature bosses. Signature bosses may be formed of groupings of closed linear bosses. For example, a signature boss may be formed as groupings of closed linear bosses defining peripheral plateaus around a central region. Groupings of signature bosses are preferably linearly aligned. A pattern of mixed inclinations is selected so that some of the signature boss groupings are aligned in the machine direction, some are aligned with a clockwise offset relative to machine direction, and some of the signature boss groupings are aligned with a counterclockwise offset relative to machine direction. One effect of this mixed inclination arrangement is that the rolls possess very good roll structure and do not exhibit the ridging effect found with prior art embossed tissue patterns.
Signature bosses, macro bosses and micro bosses serve to greatly enhance the bulk of the tissue while also enhancing the distortion of the surface thereof. The signature bosses may be groupings of continuous linear embosses and embossed or debossed to significantly greater depth than the micro bosses. The signature bosses and macro bosses may be embossed or debossed to an equal height and have similarly defined boundaries. Groupings of signature bosses may exhibit the same overall pattern but may be scaled in size, e.g., the paper product may include two differently scaled signature bosses. The macro bosses can define continuous or stitchlike patterns embossed or debossed to greater depth than micro bosses. In addition, the signature bosses further enhance the puffy or filled appearance of the sheet both by creating the illusion of shading as well as by creating actual shading due to displacement of the sheet apparently caused by puckering of surrounding regions due to the heavy embossing or debossing given to the signature.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
The present invention will be more fully understood and further advantages will become apparent when reference is made to the following detailed description of the invention and the accompanying drawings wherein like numerals represent like elements, and in which:
According to one embodiment of the present invention, enhanced perceived softness, controlled sidedness, good roll structure and good ply bonding are provided by a tissue substrate having embossed therein a pattern which is comprised of distinct elements, the first, an array of signature bosses, the second, an array of macro bosses and the third, a pattern of micro bosses. The macro bosses preferably comprise discontinuous elements that are embossed or debossed in the tissue substrate in a pattern of a meandering linear array. In the illustrated embodiments of the invention, cells defined by the macro bosses are generally in the shape of a tapered ellipse. In alternative embodiments of the invention, the cells defined by macro bosses may be differently configured.
The macro bosses further define generally linear sections aligned in a predetermined direction, which may be offset from the machine direction. The effect is a pattern having discontinuous lines and curves defining a plurality of generally interconnected cells. In one embodiment of the present invention, each cell contains only a signature boss (
Substrates for use in the present invention include toilet tissue. The paper substrates for forming the tissue are readily recognizable to the skilled artisan. In one example, the paper substrate may have a basis weight of from about 8.5 to about 15.5 pounds per 3000 square foot ream of tissue.
One embodiment of a boss pattern according to the invention is disclosed in
Referring to
In illustrated embodiments of the present invention, signature bosses 16, 18 define tulip-shaped elements.
Signature bosses 16, 18 define tulip-shaped elements. Signature bosses 16, 18 have a major axis and a minor axis and a length along the major axis being greater than a length along the minor axis. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the major axis length is more than 1.5 times greater than the minor axis length.
Macro bosses 20 define a plurality of closed cells 24 and broken linear segments 26. Linear segments 26 associated with adjacent cells 24 are generally parallel to each other and extend across the tissue paper in a predetermined direction offset from the machine direction. Closed cells 24 are generally defined as tapered ellipses. In the embodiments of
Referring to
Consumer perception testing was carried out to rate the quality of the product using the emboss patterns of the present invention. In one example, market testing was conducted in which the embossed tissues of the present invention as described in the specification (
In another test, four sets of tissue rolls were prepared from substantially identical base sheets using the patterns of
In yet another test, two sets of tissue rolls were prepared, one incorporating the emboss pattern of
Aspects of a method for manufacturing a tissue product of the present invention are shown in greater detail in the process flow diagram of
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/455,678 filed Apr. 25, 2012 now abandoned, which is a continuation of a U.S. application Ser. No. 13/081,047 filed Apr. 6, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,187,427), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/878,334 filed Sep. 9, 2010 now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/381,874 filed Mar. 17, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,799,161), which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/471,225 filed Jun. 20, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,851), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/692,797 filed Jun. 21, 2005. The priority of the foregoing applications are hereby claimed and the entirely of their disclosures are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
361844 | Taylor | Apr 1887 | A |
361849 | Taylor | Apr 1887 | A |
496964 | Wheeler | May 1893 | A |
497421 | Wheeler | May 1893 | A |
D40254 | Zschaemisch | Sep 1909 | S |
D63343 | Vandergaw et al. | Nov 1923 | S |
D64690 | Schwarz | May 1924 | S |
D77398 | De Laney | Jan 1929 | S |
2121013 | Brown | Jun 1938 | A |
D117018 | Turpan | Oct 1939 | S |
D154696 | Mitschke | Aug 1949 | S |
D167528 | Odzer | Aug 1952 | S |
D179699 | Sadinoff | Feb 1957 | S |
D184493 | Scheiding | Feb 1959 | S |
D184878 | Kerkovius | Apr 1959 | S |
2954838 | Nuorivaara | Oct 1960 | A |
3240656 | Faircloth | Mar 1966 | A |
D213661 | Hicks | Mar 1969 | S |
D231019 | Gilling et al. | Mar 1974 | S |
D231021 | Gilling et al. | Mar 1974 | S |
D239137 | Appleman | Mar 1976 | S |
D260193 | Elchook, Jr. et al. | Aug 1981 | S |
4307141 | Walbrun | Dec 1981 | A |
4320162 | Schulz | Mar 1982 | A |
4339088 | Niedermeyer | Jul 1982 | A |
4483728 | Bauernfeind | Nov 1984 | A |
D288150 | Schulz et al. | Feb 1987 | S |
4659608 | Schulz | Apr 1987 | A |
4671983 | Burt | Jun 1987 | A |
4759967 | Bauernfeind | Jul 1988 | A |
D298588 | Peddada | Nov 1988 | S |
4803032 | Schulz | Feb 1989 | A |
4927588 | Schulz | May 1990 | A |
D319349 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1991 | S |
5158819 | Goodman, Jr. et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5300347 | Underhill et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
D352833 | Schulz | Nov 1994 | S |
D354853 | Schulz | Jan 1995 | S |
D354854 | Schulz | Jan 1995 | S |
D354855 | Schulz | Jan 1995 | S |
D354856 | Schulz | Jan 1995 | S |
5409572 | Kershaw et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5436057 | Schulz | Jul 1995 | A |
D362121 | Nugent et al. | Sep 1995 | S |
D368587 | Schulz | Apr 1996 | S |
D371910 | Schulz | Jul 1996 | S |
D373905 | Schulz | Sep 1996 | S |
5573830 | Schulz | Nov 1996 | A |
D377419 | Schulz | Jan 1997 | S |
5597639 | Schulz | Jan 1997 | A |
5620776 | Schulz | Apr 1997 | A |
D393370 | Schulz et al. | Apr 1998 | S |
D393949 | Schulz et al. | May 1998 | S |
D401421 | Schulz | Nov 1998 | S |
D405269 | Schulz | Feb 1999 | S |
5874156 | Schulz | Feb 1999 | A |
D406791 | Schulz et al. | Mar 1999 | S |
D407902 | Schulz et al. | Apr 1999 | S |
D408152 | Wilhelm et al. | Apr 1999 | S |
D409000 | Dwiggins et al. | May 1999 | S |
5904812 | Salman et al. | May 1999 | A |
D411369 | Burr et al. | Jun 1999 | S |
D418306 | Burr et al. | Jan 2000 | S |
6077390 | Salman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6165319 | Heath et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6248211 | Jennings et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261666 | Enderby et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277467 | Dwiggins et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299729 | Heath et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331228 | Heath et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344111 | Wilhelm | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6413614 | Giesler, Sr. et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440268 | Baggot et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6517673 | Heath et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6558511 | Dwiggins et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6649024 | Oriaran et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6699360 | Heath et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
D488622 | Dwiggins | Apr 2004 | S |
D488931 | Dwiggins | Apr 2004 | S |
6733608 | Baggot et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6827819 | Dwiggins et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6896767 | Wilhelm | May 2005 | B2 |
6896768 | Dwiggins et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
D517816 | Dwiggins et al. | Mar 2006 | S |
D519739 | Schuh et al. | May 2006 | S |
7297226 | Schulz | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7527851 | Schuh et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7799161 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8187427 | Schuh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8287986 | Huss et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010008683 | Takai et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020079073 | Wilhelm | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030192662 | Heath et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050103456 | Hein et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060286885 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070144693 | Ruthven et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080038515 | Kershaw et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066882 | Schulz | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090179349 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090297781 | Huss et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100327484 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110183026 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120021178 | Miller et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120213965 | Schuh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130011627 | Schuh et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1253242 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1398413 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1504886 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2069446 | Mar 1997 | GB |
WO2007002171 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2006/024107 that issued Oct. 13, 2006. |
Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review filed in copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/455,678, filed Jan. 25, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130011627 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60692797 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11471225 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 12381874 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13455678 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 13619842 | US | |
Parent | 13081047 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13455678 | US | |
Parent | 12878334 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13081047 | US | |
Parent | 12381874 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 12878334 | US |