The technical field relates generally to an emergency braking assist system for a vehicle.
Driving environment monitoring systems are increasingly used in vehicles. The information detected by these systems may be used inter alia for automatic emergency braking of the vehicle. However, the performance of emergency braking is always associated with a risk to the traffic following behind. The data detected by driving environment monitoring systems must therefore be reliable and emergency braking must take place within optimum limits, in order to prevent a collision on the one hand with an object in front of the vehicle and on the other hand with a vehicle following behind.
DE 10 2010 029 223 A1 discloses a mathematical model which is used to abort an emergency braking operation initiated according to the prior art or to reduce braking force, so as to limit the collision severity of a future rear-end collision and at the same time achieve sufficient braking action.
In one exemplary embodiment, a method for automatic emergency braking of a vehicle includes detecting an object in the regions in front of and behind the vehicle and specifying at least one emergency braking parameter as a function of at least one detected object in the region in front of the vehicle. The at least one emergency braking parameter is modified if no object, in particular no travelling following vehicle, is detected in the region behind the vehicle.
In this way, emergency braking may advantageously proceed with the optimum parameters if there is no object in the region behind the vehicle, since traffic to the rear does not have to be taken into consideration.
The emergency braking parameters may include a permissible speed range within which the emergency braking assist system is active, or a deceleration requirement, or a speed reduction, or the time of emergency braking.
Advantageously, the speed range or the deceleration requirement or the speed reduction may be set to an optimum value in order to prevent a collision with the object in front of the vehicle or to reduce collision severity. An optimum value could, for example, be the maximum possible deceleration power of the vehicle's brakes. Optimum values for the speed range are inter alia the values for standard urban and extra-urban speed limits, i.e., the ranges 30-50, 70-100, and 130 km/h. In particular, emergency braking may proceed in any speed range, since there is no risk of a rear-end collision due to the absence of objects in the region to the rear.
The emergency braking parameters may be modified as follows: the permissible speed range is increased or the deceleration requirement is increased or the speed reduction is increased or the time of emergency braking is brought forward.
It may be more advantageous for the time of emergency braking to be brought forward, so as to have more time for decelerating the vehicle. Harm to other road users is ultimately ruled out by the object identification in the region to the rear.
In a further exemplary configuration, object detection in the region behind the vehicle may proceed continuously. This advantageously makes it possible to anticipate that the region behind the vehicle is free of further objects and emergency braking may be carried out with modified or increased emergency braking parameters. In this way, in particular, the region to the rear may also be monitored during emergency braking.
The increase in at least one of the emergency braking parameters may be maintained until an object, in particular a travelling following vehicle, is detected in the region behind the vehicle.
An object identified in this way in the region to the rear before or during emergency braking may be taken into consideration and the initiation or continuation of emergency braking may be adapted to changing traffic situations. In particular, the increased emergency braking parameters may be cancelled and the basic parameters applied.
In one exemplary configuration, object detection in the region behind the vehicle may determine a relative speed or a distance of the detected object. The distance and relative speed may give an indication of the future behaviour of the object following behind and thus of the emergency braking parameters to be taken into account during subsequent emergency braking.
It is thus possible in particular to examine each traffic situation individually and for emergency braking to proceed with emergency braking parameters tailored to the object following behind.
In another exemplary configuration, the increase in at least one emergency braking parameter may proceed dynamically with the relative speed or the distance of the detected object.
Adaptation of the emergency braking parameters may proceed continuously during emergency braking, the emergency braking parameters in this way being adapted to the emergency braking behaviour of the vehicle itself or to the behavior of the object following behind.
In one exemplary configuration, evasive action may be performed if a collision with the detected object in the region in front of the vehicle and the detected object in the region behind the vehicle, in particular a travelling following vehicle, is no longer preventable by emergency braking.
Evasive action may be initiated if it is ascertained during emergency braking that braking to avoid an accident with the obstacle or the object following behind can no longer be prevented despite adaptation of the emergency braking parameters. Pointless emergency braking of the vehicle may in particular be avoided in this way.
In one exemplary embodiment, an emergency braking assist system for a vehicle includes an object detection unit for the region in front of and behind the vehicle, and a control unit for carrying out a method as described above, wherein the control unit includes an electronic memory on which the method may be stored.
Other advantages of the disclosed subject matter will be readily appreciated, as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The method shown in
At the point in time 49 the object detection system detects an object in the region to the rear of the vehicle and reduces the permitted speed reduction back to the basic parameters 53 dynamically as a function of the speed and distance of the identified object. The adjustment proceeds dynamically, such that intermediate parameters, shown for example by the dashed line 51, between the optimum parameters and the basic parameters may also be adopted.
The present disclosure has been described herein in an illustrative manner, and it is to be understood that the terminology which has been used is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation. Obviously, many modifications and variations of the invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2015 216 679.1 | Sep 2015 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of International application No. PCT/DE2016/200401, filed Aug. 26, 2016, which claims priority to German application No. 10 2015 216 679.1, filed on Sep. 1, 2015, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/DE2016/200401 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 15908010 | US |