The present invention relates to internal combustion engines, and more particularly to a post-lean idle emission control.
During the combustion process, gasoline is oxidized, and hydrogen (H) and carbon (C) combine with air. Various chemical compounds are formed including carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), unburned hydrocarbons (HC), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other compounds.
Automobile exhaust systems include a three-way catalytic converter that helps oxidize CO, HC and reduce NOx in the exhaust gas. The catalytic converter includes an oxygen storage capability to provide a buffer for lean to rich air-to-fuel (AFR) deviations. For example, oxygen is stored in the catalytic converter during lean operation (i.e., excess air) and is depleted from the catalytic converter during rich operation (i.e., excess fuel).
During idle, engines may be operated using a lean AFR (i.e., an AFR greater than stoichiometry (AFRSTOICH)) to improve fuel consumption. More specifically, because a lean AFR is used, less fuel is consumed during idle. However, extended lean operation presents a challenge for exhaust after-treatment. One challenge is that the catalytic converter's NOx conversion efficiency falls off rapidly as the AFR goes lean and the catalyst becomes saturated with oxygen. Lean NOx trapping after-treatment technology has been developed to address this issue.
Another challenge is that excess oxygen is stored in the catalytic converter. More specifically, catalytic converters are formulated to store a targeted mass of oxygen. This enhances catalyst efficiency by acting as a buffer for small rich deviations, during which oxygen is released for oxidation, and lean deviations, during which the excess oxygen is stored. During extended lean operation, the catalytic converter becomes saturated with oxygen. The NOx conversion efficiency is then reduced until some of the excess oxygen is removed. The excess oxygen must be removed prior to returning to stoichiometric operation (i.e., operation using AFRSTOICH), for proper 3-way (i.e., HC, CO, and NOx) conversion efficiency to resume.
Engine control systems can remove the excess oxygen with a short period of rich operation after lean idle. As a result, excess fuel is consumed. This fuel consumption penalty cancels out some of the benefit of lean idle operation.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an engine control system that regulates fuel to an engine after lean idle operation. The engine control system includes a first module that determines a rich mass fuel rate based on a lean operation mass air flow and a stoichiometric air to fuel ratio (AFR) and that calculates a time rich based on the rich mass fuel rate. A second module regulates fuel to the engine during a rich operation period after the lean idle operation to provide the rich mass fuel rate for the time rich.
In other features, the first module calculates a mass of oxygen stored during the lean idle operation and determines an oxygen to fuel ratio (OFR) based on the stoichiometric AFR. The time rich is further calculated based on the mass of oxygen stored and the OFR. The first module calculates a product of a % oxygen content of air by mass, the lean operation mass air flow and a lean time and determines the mass of oxygen stored as a minimum of the product and a target mass of oxygen stored. The target mass of oxygen stored is based on a storage factor and a storage capacity of the catalytic converter.
In still other features, the engine control system further includes a third module that corrects the time rich based on an inlet sensor signal and an outlet sensor signal of the catalytic converter. The third module measures an actual response time between the inlet sensor signal and the outlet sensor signal and calculates a correction factor based on the actual response time and a target response time.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiment is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. As used herein, the term module refers to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that execute one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality.
With reference to
The control module 12 receives a throttle position signal from a throttle position sensor (TPS) 21 and a mass air flow (MAF) signal from a MAF sensor 23. The throttle position signal and the MAF signal are used to determine the air flow into the engine 14. The air flow data is used to calculate the corresponding fuel to be delivered to the engine 14 by the fuel system 16.
The exhaust system 18 includes an exhaust manifold 22, a catalytic converter 24, an inlet oxygen sensor 26 located upstream from the catalytic converter 24, and an outlet oxygen sensor 28 located downstream from the catalytic converter 24. It is anticipated that the sensors 26,28 can be of a type known in the art including, but not limited to, switching sensors and wide-range air-fuel (WRAF) sensors. The catalytic converter 24 treats the engine-out emissions by increasing the rate of oxidization of hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO), and the rate of reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx), to decrease tail-pipe emissions.
To enable oxidization, the catalytic converter 24 requires air or oxygen and the catalytic converter 24 can release stored oxygen as needed. In a reduction reaction, oxygen is generated from NOx and the catalytic converter 24 can store the extra oxygen as appropriate. The oxygen storage capacity (OSC) of the catalytic converter 24 is indicative of the catalytic converter's efficiency in oxidizing the HC and CO, and reducing NOx. The inlet oxygen sensor 26 communicates with the control module 12 and is responsive to the oxygen content of the exhaust stream entering the catalytic converter 24. The outlet oxygen sensor 28 communicates with the control module 12 and is responsive to the oxygen content of the exhaust stream exiting the catalytic converter 24.
The inlet oxygen sensor 26 and the outlet oxygen sensor 28 respectively generate an inlet sensor signal (ISS) and an outlet sensor signal (OSS). The ISS and OSS are voltage signals that vary based on the oxygen content of the exhaust. More specifically, as the oxygen content of the exhaust increases (e.g., AFR goes high or fuel goes lean), the voltage signal decreases. As the oxygen content of the exhaust decreases (e.g., AFR goes low or fuel goes rich), the voltage signal increases. The control module 12 receives the ISS and OSS and correlates the sensor signal voltage to the oxygen content level of the exhaust.
The post-lean idle control of the present invention monitors engine operating parameters during a lean idle period (tIDLE). The engine is operated lean during idle to improve fuel consumption because less fuel is consumed when operating lean. The engine is operated rich for a calculated period (tRICH) after lean idle operation. More specifically, the post-lean idle control of the present invention determines an excess mass fuel rate ({dot over (m)}FUELEXC) based on the engine operating conditions during the lean idle period (tIDLE). After the lean idle operation ends, the engine is operated rich to deliver {dot over (m)}FUELEXC for tRICH In this manner, the excess oxygen stored in the catalytic converter is efficiently reduced to the desired level after an extended period of lean engine idle.
The post-lean idle control calculates an excess mass air flow (MAFEXC) based on the actual air to fuel ratio (AFRLEAN), the stoichiometric air to fuel ratio (AFRSTOICH) and the lean fuel rate ({dot over (m)}FUELLEAN) during TIDLE according to the following equation:
MAFEXC=(AFRLEAN−AFRSTOICH){dot over (m)}FUELLEAN
The mass of oxygen stored in the catalytic converter (mO2STRD) during tIDLE is determined based on the following relationship:
mO2STRD=MIN[((% O2AIR)(MAFEXC)(tIDLE),mO2TARGET)]
where % O2AIR is the percentage of oxygen in air by weight (i.e., 23.2%) and mO2TARGET is the target mass of stored oxygen. mO2TARGET is calculated based on the following equation:
mO2TARGET=(fO2)(mO2CAP)
where fO2 is an oxygen storage factor and is the amount of oxygen reserve desired in the catalytic converter (e.g., equal to a nominal value of 0.5). It is anticipated that fO2 can vary (i.e., is reduced over time) based on a calculated OSC to account for aging. mO2CAP is the oxygen mass storage capacity of a new catalytic converter and is a fixed catalytic converter design parameter.
A stoichiometric oxygen to fuel ratio (OFRSTOICH) is calculated based on the following equation:
OFRSTOICH=(AFRSTOICH)(% O2AIR)
The rich fuel mass required to reduce the stored oxygen to the desired level during tRICH is calculated according to the following stoichiometric relationship:
tRICH is calculated based on the following equation:
where {dot over (m)}FUELEXC is calculated according to the following relationship:
where AFRRICH is the air to fuel ratio during tRICH and is a calibrated value (e.g., approximately 13.1). It is anticipated that AFRRICH can vary based on a temperature of the catalytic converter (TCAT) (e.g., determine AFRRICH from a look-up table based on TCAT). MAFEXC is the mass air flow during tIDLE, which is based on the signal from the MAF sensor.
Referring now to
where tRESPTARG is the target or desired response time of the OSS (i.e., lag time to go lean/rich after ISS) and tRESPMEAS is the measured or actual response time of the OSS. tRESPTARG is calculated based on the following relationship:
A corrected tRICH (tRICHCORR) is calculated as the product of tRICH and fERROR. In this manner, fERROR functions as an adaptively learned gain factor. fERROR will be equal to one when there is sufficient oxygen storage, greater than one when there is insufficient oxygen storage and less than one if there is excess oxygen storage. The post-lean idle control operates the engine to provide {dot over (m)}FUELEXC for tRICHCORR to reduce the stored oxygen to the desired level.
Referring now to
In step 306, control determines MAFEXC based on AFRACT, AFRSTOICH and {dot over (m)}FUELLEAN during tIDLE. Control determines MO2STRD in step 308 and mFUELRICH in step 310. In step 312, control determines {dot over (m)}FUELEXC In step 316, control corrects tRICH based on fERROR. Control regulates fueling to the engine to provide {dot over (m)}FUELEXC for tRICHCORR in step 318. In step 320, control determines whether tRICHCORR has expired. If tRICHCORR has not expired, control loops back to step 318. If tRICHCORR has expired, control regulates fueling based on a normal fueling rate in step 322 and control ends. The normal fueling rate can include, but is not limited to, a fueling rate that provides AFRSTOICH.
Referring now to
The post-lean idle control of the present invention precisely meters the amount (i.e., {dot over (m)}FUELEXC) and the duration (i.e., tRICHCORR) of the rich fueling event after lean idle. In this manner, the conversion efficiency of the catalytic converter is maximized for optimal emissions and the fuel consumption penalty for depleting the stored oxygen is minimized to provide optimal fuel economy.
Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the present invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this invention has been described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4760822 | Mieno et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
5228286 | Demura | Jul 1993 | A |
5438826 | Blischke et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444977 | Kawabata | Aug 1995 | A |
6622479 | Kakuyama et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6701706 | Bruck et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6812029 | Ohsuga et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828156 | Ohsuga et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060260294 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |