EMULSION FLOW OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR SUPPRESING VIBRATION OF COLD CONTINUOUS ROLLING MILL

Abstract

An emulsion flow optimization method suitable for a cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression. Said method aims to suppress vibrations, and by means of an oil film thickness model and a friction coefficient model, an optimum set value of the emulsion flow rate for each rolling stand that aims to achieve vibration suppression is optimized on the basis of an over-lubrication film thickness critical value and an under-lubrication film thickness critical value that are proposed. The described method greatly reduces the incidence of rolling mill vibration defects, improves production efficiency and product quality, treats rolling mill vibration defects, and improves the surface quality and rolling process stability of a finished strip of a cold continuous rolling mill.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to the technical field of cold continuous rolling, in particular to an emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill.

BACKGROUND

Rolling mill vibration defect is always one of the difficult problems that perplex the high-speed and stable production of an on-site cold continuous rolling mill and ensure the surface quality of finished strip. In the past, on-site treatment of rolling mill vibration defects generally depends on the control over the speed of the rolling mill, by which the vibration defects can be weakened, but the improvement of production efficiency is restricted and the economic benefits of enterprises are seriously affected. However, for the cold continuous rolling mill, its device and process features determine the potential of vibration suppression. Therefore, setting reasonable process parameters is the core means for vibration suppression. Through theoretical research and on-the-spot tracking, it is found that the rolling mill vibration is directly related to the lubrication state between the roll gaps. If the roll gaps are in an over-lubrication state, it is indicated that the friction coefficient is too small, thus it is likely to cause slip in the rolling process to cause the self-excited vibration of the rolling mill; if the roll gap is in an under-lubrication state, it is indicated that the average oil film thickness between the roll gaps is less than the required minimum value, thus it is likely to cause sharp increase of the friction coefficient due to rupture of oil films in the roll gaps during the rolling process, which leads to the change of rolling pressure and periodic fluctuation of system stiffness, and thus also causes self-excited vibration of the rolling mill. It can be seen that the key to suppress the vibration of the rolling mill is to control the lubrication state between the roll gaps. On the premise that the rolling schedule, the rolling process and process parameters such as the emulsion concentration and the initial temperature are determined, the setting of emulsion flow rate directly determines the roll gap lubrication state of each rolling stand of the cold continuous rolling mill, and is the main process control means of the cold continuous rolling mill.

The patent No. 201410522168.9 discloses a cold continuous rolling mill vibration suppression method, which comprises the following steps: 1) arranging a cold rolling mill vibration monitoring device on the fifth or fourth rolling stand of the cold continuous rolling mill, and determining whether the rolling mill is about to vibrate by the energy of a vibration signal; 2) arranging a liquid injection device which can independently adjust the flow rate in front of an inlet emulsion injection beam of the fifth or fourth rolling stand of the cold rolling mill; and 3) calculating the forward slip value to determine whether to turn on/off the liquid injection device. The patent No. 201410522168.9 discloses a comprehensive emulsion flow optimization method for ultra-thin strip rolling of a cold continuous rolling mill. The existing device parameters and process parameter data of a cold continuous rolling mill control system are used to define the process parameters of comprehensive emulsion flow optimization considering the slip, vibration and hot slide injury as well as shape and pressure control, and determine the optimal flow rate distribution value of each rolling stand under the current tension schedule and rolling reduction schedule. The comprehensive optimization setting of emulsion flow rate for ultra-thin strip rolling is realized by computer program control. The above patents mainly focus on monitoring equipment, forward slip calculation model, emulsion flow rate control and other aspects to realize rolling mill vibration control; vibration is only a constraint condition of emulsion flow rate control, and is not the main treatment object.

SUMMARY

(I) Technical Problems Solved

The purpose of the invention is to provide an emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill. The method aims to suppress vibrations, and by means of an oil film thickness model and a friction coefficient model, comprehensive optimization setting for the emulsion flow rate for each rolling stand is realized on the basis of an over-lubrication film thickness critical value and an under-lubrication film thickness critical value that are proposed so as to achieve the goals of treating rolling mill vibration defects, and improving the surface quality of a finished strip.

(II) Technical Solution

An emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill includes the following steps:

S1, collecting device feature parameters of the cold continuous rolling mill, wherein the device feature parameters include: the radius R_i of a working roll of each rolling stand, the surface linear velocity ν_ri of a roll of each rolling stand, the original roughness Ra_ir0 of a working roll of each rolling stand, the roughness attenuation coefficient B_L of a working roll, the distance l between rolling stands, and the rolling kilometer L_i after roll change of a working roll of each rolling stand, wherein i is 1, 2, . . . , n, and represents for the ordinal number of rolling stands of the cold continuous rolling mill, and n is the total number of rolling stands;

S2, collecting key rolling process parameters of a strip, wherein the key rolling process parameters include: the inlet thickness h_0i of each rolling stand, the outlet thickness h_1i of each rolling stand, strip width B, the inlet speed ν_0i of each rolling stand, the outlet speed ν_1i of each rolling stand, the inlet temperature T₁^r, strip deformation resistance K_i of each rolling stand, rolling pressure P_i of each rolling stand, back tension T_0i of each rolling stand, front tension T_1i of each rolling stand, emulsion concentration influence coefficient k_c, pressure-viscosity coefficient θ of a lubricant, strip density ρ, specific heat capacity S of a strip, emulsion concentration C, emulsion temperature T_c and thermal-work equivalent J;

S3, defining process parameters involved in the process of emulsion flow optimization, wherein the process parameters include that an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of each rolling stand is ξ_i⁺ and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁺, an under-lubrication film thickness critical value is and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁻, the rolling reduction amount is Δh_i,h_0i−h_1i, the rolling reduction rate is

${\varepsilon }_i=\frac{\Delta h_i}{h_{0i}},$

and the inlet temperature of each rolling stand is T_i^r, the distance l between the rolling stands is evenly divided into m sections, and the temperature in the sections is represented by T_i,j (wherein, 1≤j≤m), and T_i^r=T_i−1,m the over-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁺, and the under-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁻;

S4, setting the initial set value of an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function of the cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression as F₀=1.0×10¹⁰;

wherein the executing order of steps S1 to S4 is not limited.

S5, calculating the bite angle α_i of each rolling stand according to the rolling theory, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:

${\alpha }_i=\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}},$

R_i′ is the flattening radius of the working roll of the i^th rolling stand, and is the calculation process value of rolling pressure;

S6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i of each rolling stand;

S7, setting the emulsion flow rate w_i of each rolling stand;

S8, calculating the strip outlet temperature T_i of each rolling stand;

S9, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function F(X):

$\hspace{1em}\{\begin{array}{c}F\left(X\right)=\frac{\lambda }{n}\sum _{i=1}^n\sqrt{{\left({\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\right)}^2}+\left(1-\lambda \right)\max {\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\\ {\xi }_i^{-}<{\xi }_i<{\xi }_i^{+}\end{array}$

S10, determination whether the in-equation F(X)<F₀ is established, if yes, enabling w_i^y=w_i,F₀=F(X), and then turning to step S11, since F₀=1.0×10¹⁰ under the initial circumstance, the value is very large, in the first calculation process, F(X) must be smaller than F₀, and in the subsequent x calculation processes, the corresponding F(X) is obtained with the change of w_i, and the x^th F₀ is the x−1^thF(X), if the x^th F(X) is smaller than the x−1^thF(X), it is determined that F(X)<F₀ is established and turn to step S11; otherwise, turning directly to step S11;

S11, determining whether the emulsion flow rate w_i exceeds a feasible region range, if yes, turning to step S12; otherwise, turning to step S7, wherein the feasible region of w_i ranges from 0 to the maximum emulsion flow rate value allowed by the rolling mill.

S12, outputting an optimal emulsion flow rate set value w_i′, wherein w_i^y is the value of w_i when the calculated value of F(X) in the feasible region is minimum.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the step S6 includes the following steps:

S6.1, calculating the neutral angle γ_i of each rolling stand:

${\gamma }_i=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}\left[1+\frac{1}{2u}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)\right];$

S6.2, calculating to obtain

$u_i^{+}\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{+}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{+},$

the roll gap is just in an over-lubrication state;

S6.3, calculating an over-lubrication film thickness critical value ξ_i⁺ of each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, namely u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi (in the formula, a_i is the liquid friction influence coefficient, b_i is the dry friction influence coefficient, and B_i is the friction coefficient attenuation index), wherein

${\xi }_i^{+}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{+}-a_i}{b_i};$

S6.4, calculating to obtain

$u_i^{-}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{-}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{-},$

the roll gap is Just in an under-lubrication state;

S6.5, calculating an under-lubrication film thickness critical value ξ_i⁻ of each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, namely u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi, wherein

${\xi }_i^{-}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{-}-a_i}{b_i};$

and

S6.6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i of each rolling stand, wherein

${\xi }_{0i}=\frac{{\xi }_i^{+}+{\xi }_i^{-}}{2}.$

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the step S8 includes the following steps:

S8.1, calculating the outlet temperature T₁ of the first rolling stand, wherein

$T_1=T_1^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/2\right)}·\frac{K_1\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_1}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}};$

S8.2, enabling i=1;

S8.3, calculating the temperature T_i,1 of the first section of strip behind the outlet of the i^th rolling stand, i.e. T_i,1=T_i;

S8.4, enabling j=2;

S8.5, showing the relationship between the temperature of the j^th section and the temperature of the j−1^th section by the following equation:

$T_{i,j}=-\frac{2k_0{w}^{0.264}\exp \left(9.45-0.1918C\right)\times 1.163l}{v_{1i}{h}_{1i}\rho \mathrm{Sm}}{T}_{i,j-1}^{-0.213}\left(T_{i,j-1}-T_c\right)+T_{i,j-1},$

wherein k₀ is the influence coefficient of the nozzle shape and spraying angle, and 0.8<k₀<1.2;

S8.6, determining whether the in-equation j<m is established, if yes, enabling j=j+1, and then turning to step S8.5; otherwise, turning to step S8.7;

S8.7, obtaining the temperature T_i,m of the m^th section by iterative calculation;

S8.8, calculating the inlet temperature T_i+1^r of the i+1^th rolling stand: T_i+1^r=T_i,m;

S8.9, calculating the outlet temperature T_i+1 of the i+1^th rolling stand, wherein

$T_{i+1}=T_{i+1}^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_{i+1}/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_{i+1}/2\right)}·\frac{K_{i+1}\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_{i+1}}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}};$

S8.10, determining whether the in-equation i<n is established, if yes, enabling i=i+1, and then turning to step S8.3; otherwise, turning to step S8.11; and

S8.11, obtaining the outlet temperature T_i of each rolling stand.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the step S9 includes the following steps:

S9.1, calculating the dynamic viscosity η_0i of an emulsion between roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein η_0ib·exp(−a·T_i), in the formula, a,b are the dynamic viscosity parameters of lubricating oil under atmospheric pressure;

S9.2, calculating the oil film thickness ξ_i between the roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:

${\xi }_i=\frac{h_{0i}+h_{1i}}{2h_{0i}}·k_c·\frac{3\theta {\eta }_{0i}\left(v_{\mathrm{ri}}+v_{0i}\right)}{{\alpha }_i\left[1-e^{-\theta \left(K-\frac{T_{0i}}{h_{0i}·B}\right)}\right]}-k_{\mathrm{rg}}·\left(1+K_{\mathrm{rs}}\right)·{\mathrm{Ra}}_{\mathrm{ir}0}·e^{-B_L·L_i}$

in the formula, k_rg represents the coefficient of the strength of entrainment of lubricant by the longitudinal surface roughness of the work roll and the strip steel, and is in the range of 0.09-0.15, and K_rs represents the impression rate, that is, the ratio of transferring the surface roughness of the working roll to the strip; and

S9.3, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function

$\hspace{1em}\{\begin{array}{c}F\left(X\right)=\frac{\lambda }{n}\sum _{i=1}^n\sqrt{{\left({\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\right)}^2}+\left(1-\lambda \right)\max {\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\\ {\xi }_i^{-}<{\xi }_i<{\xi }_i^{+}\end{array}$

in the formula, X={w_i} is the optimization variable and λ is the distribution coefficient.

In the present application, as long as the next step is not conditional on the result of the previous step, it is not necessary to follow the steps, unless the next step depends on the previous step.

(III) Beneficial Effects

the technical solution of the invention is adopted, and the emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of the cold continuous rolling mill fully combines the device and process features of the cold continuous rolling mill, and aiming at the problems of vibration defects, starting from the comprehensive optimization setting for the emulsion flow rate of each rolling stand and changing the previous idea of constant emulsion flow control for each rolling stand of the cold continuous rolling mill, the method obtains the optimal set value of the emulsion flow rate for each rolling stand that aims to achieve vibration suppression by optimization; and the method greatly reduces the incidence of rolling mill vibration defects, improves production efficiency and product quality, brings greater economic benefits for enterprises, treats rolling mill vibration defects, and improves the surface quality and rolling process stability of a finished strip of a cold continuous rolling mill.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the present invention, the same reference numerals always represent the same features, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an emulsion flow optimization method of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of calculating the vibration determination index reference value;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of calculating the strip outlet temperature of each rolling stand; and

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of calculating an emulsion flow comprehensive optimization objective function.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The technical solution of the present invention will be further described in combination with the drawings and the embodiments.

Rolling mill vibration defects are very easily caused between roll gaps of each rolling stand of a cold continuous rolling mill, whether in an over-lubrication state or in an under-lubrication state, and the setting of the emulsion flow rate directly affects the lubrication state between the roll gaps of each rolling stand. In order to realize the treatment of the rolling mill vibration defects, starting from the emulsion flow rate, this patent ensures that both the overall lubrication state of the cold continuous rolling mill and the lubrication state of individual rolling stands can be optimum through the comprehensive optimal distribution of the emulsion flow rate of the cold continuous rolling mill, so as to achieve the goal of treating the rolling mill vibration defects, improving the surface quality and rolling process stability of a finished strip of the cold continuous rolling mill.

Referring to FIG. 1, an emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill includes the following steps:

S1, collecting device feature parameters of the cold continuous rolling mill, wherein the device feature parameters include: the radius R_i of a working roll of each rolling stand, the surface linear velocity ν_ri of a roll of each rolling stand, the original roughness Ra_ir0 of a working roll of each rolling stand, the roughness attenuation coefficient B_L of a working roll, the distance l between rolling stands, and the rolling kilometer L_i after roll change of a working roll of each rolling stand, wherein i is 1, 2, . . . , n, and represents the ordinal number of rolling stands of the cold continuous rolling mill, and n is the total number of rolling stands;

S2, collecting key rolling process parameters of a strip, wherein the key rolling process parameters include: the inlet thickness h_0i of each rolling stand, the outlet thickness h_1i of each rolling stand, strip width B, the inlet speed ν_0i of each rolling stand, the outlet speed ν_1i of each rolling stand, the inlet temperature T₁^r, strip deformation resistance K_i of each rolling stand, rolling pressure P_i of each rolling stand, back tension T_0i of each rolling stand, front tension T_1i of each rolling stand, emulsion concentration influence coefficient k_c, pressure-viscosity coefficient θ of a lubricant, strip density ρ, specific heat capacity S of a strip, emulsion concentration C, emulsion temperature T_c and thermal-work equivalent J;

S3, defining process parameters involved in the process of emulsion flow optimization, wherein the process parameters include that an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of each rolling stand is ξ_i⁺ and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁺, an under-lubrication film thickness critical value is ξ_i⁺ and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁻, the rolling reduction amount is Δh_i=h_0i−h_1i, the rolling reduction rate is

${\varepsilon }_i=\frac{\Delta h_i}{h_{0i}},$

the inlet temperature of each rolling stand is T_i^r, the distance l between the rolling stands is evenly divided into m sections, and the temperature in the sections is represented by T_i,j(wherein, 1≤j≤m), and T_i^r=T_i−1,m, the over-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁺, and the under-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁻;

S4, setting the initial set value of an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function of the cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression as F₀=1.0×10¹⁰;

the executing order of steps S1 to S4 is not limited, and in some cases, steps S1 to S4 can be performed simultaneously.

S5, calculating the bite angle α_i of each rolling stand according to the rolling theory, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:

${\alpha }_i=\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}},$

R_i′ is the flattening radius of the working roll of the i^th rolling stand, and is the calculation process value of rolling pressure;

S6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation flowchart is shown in FIG. 2:

S6.1, calculating the neutral angle γ_i of each rolling stand:

${\gamma }_i=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}\left[1+\frac{1}{2u_i}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)\right];$

S6.2, calculating to obtain

$u_i^{+}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{+}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{+},$

the roll gap is Just in an over-lubrication state;

S6.3, calculating an over-lubrication film thickness critical value ξ_i⁺ of each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, namely u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi (in the formula, a_i is the liquid friction influence coefficient, b_i is the dry friction influence coefficient, and B_i is the friction coefficient attenuation index), wherein

${\xi }_i^{+}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{+}-a_i}{b_i};$

S6.4, calculating to obtain

$u_i^{-}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{-}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{-},$

the roll gap is just in an under-lubrication state;

S6.5, calculating an under-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁻ each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, namely u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi, wherein

${\xi }_i^{-}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{-}-a_i}{b_i};$

and

S6.6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i of each rolling stand, wherein

${\xi }_{0i}\frac{{\xi }_i^{+}+{\xi }_i^{-}}{2};$

S7, setting the emulsion flow rate w_i of each rolling stand;

S8, calculating the strip outlet temperature T_i of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation flowchart is shown in FIG. 3,

S8.1, calculating the outlet temperature T₁ of the first rolling stand, wherein

$T_1=T_1^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1\text{/}4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1\text{/}2\right)}·\frac{K_1\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_1}\right)}{\rho SJ};$

S8.2, enabling i=1;

S8.3, calculating the temperature T_i,1 of the first section of strip behind the outlet of the i^th rolling stand, i.e. T_i,1=T_i;

S8.4, enabling j=2;

S8.5, showing the relationship between the temperature of the j^th section and the temperature of the j−1^th section by the following equation:

$T_{i,j}=-\frac{2k_0{w}_i^{0.264}\exp \left(9.45-0.1918C\right)\times 1.163l}{v_{1i}{h}_{1i}\rho Sm}{T}_{i,j-1}^{-0.213}\left(T_{i,j-1}-T_c\right)+T_{i,j-1},$

wherein k₀ is the influence coefficient of the nozzle shape and spraying angle, and 0.8<k₀<1.2;

S8.6, determining whether the in-equation j<m is established, if yes, enabling j=j+1, and then turning to step S8.5; otherwise, turning to step S8.7;

S8.7, obtaining the temperature T_i,m of the m^th section by iterative calculation;

S8.8, calculating the inlet temperature T_i+1^r of the i+1^th rolling stand: T_i+1^r=T_i,m;

S8.9, calculating the outlet temperature T_i+1 of the i+1^th rolling stand, wherein

$T_{i+1}=T_{i+1}^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_{i+1}\text{/}4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_{i+1}\text{/}2\right)}·\frac{K_{i+1}\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_{i+1}}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}};$

S8.10, determining whether the in-equation i<n is established, if yes, enabling i=i+1, and then turning to step S8.3; otherwise, turning to step S8.11; and

S8.11, obtaining the outlet temperature T_i of each rolling stand;

S9, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function F(X), wherein the calculation flowchart is shown in FIG. 4,

S9.1, calculating the dynamic viscosity η_0i, of an emulsion between roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein η_0ib·exp(−a·T_i), in the formula, a,b are the dynamic viscosity parameters of lubricating oil under atmospheric pressure;

S9.2, calculating the oil film thickness ξ_i between the roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:

${\xi }_i=\frac{h_{0i}+h_{1i}}{2h_{0i}}·k_c·\frac{3\theta {\eta }_{0i}\left(v_{\mathrm{ri}}+v_{0i}\right)}{{\alpha }_i[1-e^{-\theta \left(K-\frac{T_{0i}}{h_{0i}·B}\right)}]}-k_{\mathrm{rg}}·\left(1+K_{\mathrm{rs}}\right)·{\mathrm{Ra}}_{\mathrm{ir}0}·e^{-B_L·L_i}$

in the formula, k_rg represents the coefficient of the strength of entrainment of lubricant by the longitudinal surface roughness of the work roll and the strip steel, and is in the range of 0.09-0.15, and K_rs represents the impression rate, that is, the ratio of transferring the surface roughness of the working roll to the strip; and

S9.3, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function:

$\hspace{1em}\{\begin{array}{c}F\left(X\right)=\frac{\lambda }{n}\sum _{i=1}^n\sqrt{{\left({\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\right)}^2}+\left(1-\lambda \right)\max {\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\\ {\xi }_i^{-}<{\xi }_i<{\xi }_i^{+}\end{array}$

in the formula, X={w_i} is the optimization variable and λ is the distribution coefficient;

S10, determining whether the in-equation F(X)<F₀ is established, if yes, enabling w_i^y=w_i,F₀=F(X), and then turning to step S11; otherwise, turning directly to step S11;

S11, determining whether the emulsion flow rate w_i exceeds the a feasible region range, if yes, turning to step S12; otherwise, turning to step S7, wherein the feasible region of w_i ranges from 0 to the maximum emulsion flow rate value allowed by the rolling mill.

S12, outputting an optimal emulsion flow rate set value w_i^y, wherein w_i^y is the value of w_i when the calculated value of F(X) in the feasible region is minimum.

Embodiment 1

In order to further explain the application process of the related technology of the present application, the application process of an emulsion flow optimization method for a cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression is described by taking a 1730 cold continuous rolling mill in a cold rolling plant as an example.

An emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill includes the following steps:

S1, collecting device feature parameters of the cold continuous rolling mill, wherein the 1730 cold continuous rolling mill in a cold rolling plant has 5 rolling stands in total, and the device feature parameters mainly include: the radius R_i={210,212,230,230,228} mm of a working roll of each rolling stand, the surface linear velocity ν_ri={180,320,500,800,1150} m/min of a roll of each rolling stand, the original roughness Ra_ir0={1.0,1.0,0.8,0.8,1.0} um of a working roll of each rolling stand, the roughness attenuation coefficient B_L=0.01 of a working roll, the distance l=2700 mm between rolling stands, and the rolling kilometer L_i={100,110,230,180,90} km after roll change of a working roll of each rolling stand, wherein i is 1, 2, . . . , n, and represents the ordinal number of rolling stands of the cold continuous rolling mill, and n=5 is the total number of rolling stands, the same below;

S2, collecting key rolling process parameters of a strip, wherein the key rolling process parameters mainly include: the inlet thickness h_0i={2.0,1.14,0.63,0.43,0.28} mm of each rolling stand, the outlet thickness h_1i={1.14,0.63,0.43,0.28,0.18} mm of each rolling stand, strip width B=966 mm, the inlet speed ν_0i={110,190,342,552,848} m/min of each rolling stand, the outlet speed ν_1i={190,342,552,848,1214} m/min of each rolling stand, the inlet temperature T₁^r=110° C., strip deformation resistance K_i={360,400,480,590,650} MPa of each rolling stand, rolling pressure P_i={12800,11300,10500,9600,8800} kN of each rolling stand, back tension T_0i{70,145,208,202,229} MPa of each rolling stand, front tension T_1i={145,208,202,229,56} MPa of each rolling stand, emulsion concentration influence coefficient k_c=0.9, pressure-viscosity coefficient θ=0.034 of a lubricant, strip density ρ=7800 kg/m³, specific heat capacity S=0.47 kJ/(kg·° C.) of a strip, emulsion concentration C=4.2%, emulsion temperature T_c=58° C. and thermal-work equivalent J=1;

S3, defining process parameters involved in the process of emulsion flow optimization, wherein the process parameters mainly include that an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁺ each rolling stand is and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁺, an under-lubrication film thickness critical value is ξ_i⁻ and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁻, the rolling reduction amount is Δh_i=h_0i−h_1i, the rolling reduction rate is

${\varepsilon }_i\frac{\Delta h_i}{h_{0i}},$

the inlet temperature of each rolling stand is T_i^r, and the distance l=2700 mm between the rolling stands is evenly divided into m=30 sections, and the temperature in the sections is represented by T_i,j (wherein, 1≤j≤m), and T_i^r=T_i−1,m, the over-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁺, and the under-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁻;

S4, setting the initial set value of an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function of a cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression as F₀=1.0×10¹⁰;

S5, calculating the bite angle α_i of each rolling stand according to the rolling theory, wherein the calculation formula is

${\alpha }_i=\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}},$

from which it can be obtained that α_i=10.0556,0.0427,0.0258,0.0223,0.01841;

S6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i of each rolling stand;

S6.1, calculating the neutral angle γ_i of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation formula is

${\gamma }_i=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}\left[1+\frac{1}{2u_i}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)\right];$

S6.2, calculating to obtain u_i⁺={0.0248,0.0186,0.0132,0.0136,0.0191} according to the formula

$u_i^{+}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{+}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{+}=1,$

the roll gap is just in an over-lubrication state;

S6.3, calculating an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁺ each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, i.e. u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi (in the formula, a_i is the liquid friction influence coefficient, a_i=0.0126, b_i is the dry friction influence coefficient, b_i=0.1416, and B_i is the friction coefficient attenuation index, B_i=−2.4297), wherein the calculation formula is

${\xi }_i^{+}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{+}-a_i}{b_i},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i⁻={1.009,1.301,2.249,2.039,1.268} um;

S6.4, calculating to obtain u_i⁻={0.1240,0.0930,0.0660,0.0680,0.0955} according to the formula

$u_i^{-}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{-}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{-}=0.6,$

the roll gap is just in an under-lubrication state;

S6.5, calculating an under-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁻ each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, i.e. u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi, wherein the calculation formula is

${\xi }_i^{-}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{-}-a_i}{b_i},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i⁻={0.098,0.233,0.401,0.386,0.220} um;

S6.6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i, wherein

${\xi }_{0i}=\frac{{\xi }_i^{+}+{\xi }_i^{-}}{2},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_0i={0.554,0.767,1.325,1.213,0.744};

S7. Setting the emulsion flow rate of each rolling stand to be w_i={900,900,900,900,900} L/min;

S8, calculating the strip outlet temperature T_i of each rolling stand,

S8.1, calculating the outlet temperature T₁ of the first rolling stand,

$T_1=T_1^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/2\right)}·\frac{K_1\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_1}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}}=110+\frac{1-\left(0.43/4\right)}{1-\left(0.43/2\right)}·\frac{360\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-0.43}\right)}{7.8·0.47·1}=172.76°C.$

S8.2, enabling i=1;

S8.3, calculating the temperature T_1,1, of the first section of strip behind the outlet of the first rolling stand, i.e. T_i,1=T_i=172.76° C.;

S8.4, enabling j=2;

S8.5, showing the relationship formula between the temperature of the j^th section and the temperature of the j−1^th section by the following equation:

$T_{i,j}=-\frac{2k_0{w}_i^{0.264}\exp \left(9.45-0.1918C.\right)\times 1.163l}{v_{1i}{h}_{1i}\rho Sm}{T}_{i,j-1}^{-0.213}\left(T_{i,j-1}-T_c\right)+T_{i,j-1},$

wherein k₀=1.0;

S8.6, determining whether the in-equation j<m is established: if yes, enabling j=j+1. and then turning to step S8.5; otherwise, turning to step S8.7;

S8.7, obtaining the temperature T_1,30=103.32° C. of the m=30^th section by iterative calculation finally;

S8.8, calculating the inlet temperature T₂^r of the second rolling stand: T₂^r=T_1,m=103.32° C.;

S8.9, calculating the outlet temperature T₂ of the second rolling stand:

$T_2=T_2^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_2/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_2/2\right)}·\frac{K_2\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_2}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}}=103.32+\frac{1-\left(0.45/4\right)}{1-\left(0.45/2\right)}·\frac{400\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-0.45}\right)}{7800·0.47·1}=178.02°C.;$

S8.10, determining whether the in-equation i<n is established: if yes, enabling i=i+1, and then turning to step S8.3; otherwise, turning to step S8.11;

S8.11, obtaining the outlet temperature T_i={172.76,178.02,186.59,194.35,206.33}° C. of each rolling stand;

S9, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function F(X);

S9.1, calculating the dynamic viscosity η_0i of an emulsion between roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein η_0i=b·exp(−a·T_i), in the formula, a,b are the dynamic viscosity parameters of lubricating oil under atmospheric pressure, and it can be obtained from a=0.05, b=2.5 that η_0i={5.39,5.46,5.59,5.69,5.84};

S9.2, calculating the oil film thickness ξ_i between the roll gaps of each rolling stand according to the following formula:

${\xi }_i=\frac{h_{0i}+h_{1i}}{2h_{0i}}·k_c·\frac{3\theta {\eta }_{0i}\left(v_{\mathrm{ri}}+v_{0i}\right)}{{\alpha }_i\left[1-e^{-\theta \left(K-\frac{T_{0i}}{h_{0i}·B}\right)}\right]}-k_{rg}·\left(1+K_{rs}\right)·{\mathrm{Ra}}_{\mathrm{ir}0}·e^{-B_{\mathrm{Li}}{L}_i}$

wherein in the formula, k_rg represents the coefficient of the strength of entrainment of lubricant by the longitudinal surface roughness of the work roll and the strip steel, k_rg=1.183, and K_rs represents the impression rate, that is, the ratio of transferring the surface roughness of the working roll to the strip, K_rs=0.576, from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i={0.784,0.963,2.101,2.043,1.326} um;

S9.3, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function:

$\{\begin{array}{c}F\left(X\right)=\frac{\lambda }{n}\sum _{i=1}^n\sqrt{{\left({\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\right)}^2}+\left(1-\lambda \right)\max {\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\\ {\xi }_i^{-}<{\xi }_i<{\xi }_i^{+}\end{array}\hspace{1em}$

in the formula, X={w_i} is the optimization variable, λ=0.5 is the distribution coefficient, and thus F(X)=0.94;

S10, enabling w_i^y=w_i={900,900,900,900,900}L/min if F(X)=0.94<F₀=1×10¹⁰ is established, F₀=F(X)=0.94, turning to step S11, wherein in the subsequent x calculation processes, the corresponding F(X) is obtained with the change of w_i, and the x^th F₀ is the x−1^th F(X). If the x^th F(X) is smaller than the x−1^th F(X), it is judged that F(X)<F₀ is established and turn to step S11;

S11, determining whether the emulsion flow rate w_i exceeds the feasible region range. If yes, turning to step S12; otherwise, turning to step S7; and

S12, outputting an optimal emulsion flow rate set value w_i^y={1022,1050,1255,1698,1102}L/min.

Embodiment 2

In order to further explain the application process of the related technology of the present application, the application process of an emulsion flow optimization method for a cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression is described by taking a 1420 cold continuous rolling mill in a cold rolling plant as an example.

An emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill includes the following steps:

S1, collecting device feature parameters of the cold continuous rolling mill, wherein the 1420 cold continuous rolling mill in a cold rolling plant has 5 rolling stands in total, and the device feature parameters mainly include: the radius R_i{211,213,233,233,229} mm of a working roll of each rolling stand, the surface linear velocity ν_ri={182,322,504,805,1153} m/min of a roll of each rolling stand, the original roughness Ra_ir0={1.0,1.0,0.9,0.9,1.0} um of a working roll of each rolling stand, the roughness attenuation coefficient B_L=0.015 of a working roll, the distance l=2750 mm between rolling stands, and the rolling kilometer L_i={120,130,230,190,200} km after roll change of a working roll of each rolling stand, wherein i is 1, 2, . . . , n, and represents the ordinal number of rolling stands of the cold continuous rolling mill, and n=5 is the total number of rolling stands, the same below;

S2, collecting key rolling process parameters of a strip, wherein the key rolling process parameters mainly include: the inlet thickness h_0i={2.1,1.15,0.65,0.45,0.3} mm of each rolling stand, the outlet thickness h_1i={1.15,0.65,0.45,0.3,0.15} mm of each rolling stand, strip width B=955 mm, the inlet speed ν_0i={115,193,346,555,852} m/min of each rolling stand, the outlet speed ν_1i={191,344,556,849,1217} m/min of each rolling stand, the inlet temperature T₁^r=115° C., strip deformation resistance K_i={370,410,490,590,660} MPa of each rolling stand, rolling pressure P_i={12820,11330,10510,9630,8820} kN of each rolling stand, back tension T_0i={73,148,210,205,232}MPa of each rolling stand, front tension T_1i={147,212,206,231,60} MPa of each rolling stand, emulsion concentration influence coefficient k_c=0.9, pressure-viscosity coefficient θ=0.036 of a lubricant, strip density ρ=7800 kg/m³, specific heat capacity S=0.49 kJ/(kg·° C.) of a strip, emulsion concentration C=4.5%, emulsion temperature T_c=59° C. and thermal-work equivalent J=1;

S3, defining process parameters involved in the process of emulsion flow optimization, wherein the process parameters mainly include that an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁺ each rolling stand is and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁺, an under-lubrication film thickness critical value is and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁻, the rolling reduction amount is Δh_i=h_0i−h_1i, the rolling reduction rate is

${\varepsilon }_i=\frac{\Delta h_i}{h_{0i}},$

the inlet temperature of each rolling stand is T_i^r, the distance l=2750 mm between the rolling stands is evenly divided into m=30 sections, and the temperature in the sections is represented by T_i,j (wherein, 1≤j≤m), and T_i^r=T_i−1,m, the over-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁺, and the under-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁻;

S4, setting the initial set value of an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function of a cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression as F₀=1.0×10¹⁰;

S5, calculating the bite angle α_i of each rolling stand according to the rolling theory, wherein the calculation formula is

${\alpha }_i=\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}},$

from which it can be obtained that α_i={0.0566,0.0431,0.0261,0.0227,0.0188};

S6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i of each rolling stand;

S6.1, calculating the neutral angle γ_i of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation formula is

${\gamma }_i=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}\left[1+\frac{1}{2u_i}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)\right];$

S6.2, calculating to obtain u_i⁺={0.0251,0.0187,0.0135,0.0138,0.0193} according to the formula

$u_i^{+}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{+}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{+}=1,$

the roll gap is just in an over-lubrication state;

S6.3, calculating an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁺ each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, i.e. u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi (in the formula, a_i is the liquid friction influence coefficient, a_i=0.0128, b_i is the dry friction influence coefficient, b_i=0.1426, and B_i is the friction coefficient attenuation index, B_i=−2.4307), wherein the calculation formula is

${\xi }_i^{+}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{+}-a_i}{b_i},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i⁺={1.011,1.321,2.253,2.041,1.272} um;

S6.4, calculating to obtain u_i⁻={0.1243,0.0936,0.0664,0.0685,0.0955} according to the formula

$u_i^{-}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{-}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{-}=0.6,$

the roll gap is just in an under-lubrication state;

S6.5, calculating an under-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁻ each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, i.e. u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi, wherein the calculation formula is

${\xi }_i^{-}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{-}-a_i}{b_i},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i⁻={0.101,0.236,0.411,0.389,0.223} um;

S6.6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i, wherein

${\xi }_{0i}=\frac{{\xi }_i^{+}+{\xi }_i^{-}}{2},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_0i={0.557,0.769,1.327,1.215,0.746};

S7, setting the emulsion flow rate of each rolling stand to be w_i={900,900,900,900,900} L/min;

S8, calculating the strip outlet temperature T_i of each rolling stand,

S8.1, calculating the outlet temperature T₁ of the first rolling stand,

$T_1=T_1^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/2\right)}·\frac{K_1\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_1}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}}=110+\frac{1-\left(0.43/4\right)}{1-\left(0.43/2\right)}·\frac{360\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-0.43}\right)}{7.8·0.47·1}=175.81°C.$

S8.2, enabling i=1;

S8.3, calculating the temperature T_1,1, of the first section of strip behind the outlet of the first rolling stand, i.e. T_i,1=T_i=175.81° C.;

S8.4, enabling j=2;

S8.5, showing the relationship between the temperature of the j^th section and the temperature of the j−1^th section by the following equation:

$T_{i,j}=-\frac{2k_0{w}_i^{0.264}\exp \left(9.45-0.1918C.\right)\times 1.163l}{v_{1i}{h}_{1i}\rho Sm}{T}_{i,j-1}^{-0.213}\left(T_{i,j-1}-T_c\right)+T_{i,j-1},$

wherein k₀=1.0;

S8.6, determining whether the in-equation j<m is established: if yes, enabling j=j+1. and then turning to step S8.5; otherwise, turning to step S8.7;

S8.7, obtaining the temperature T_1,30=105.41° C. of the m=30^th section by iterative calculation finally;

S8.8, calculating the inlet temperature T₂^r of the second rolling stand: T₂^r=T_1,m=105.41° C.;

S8.9, calculating the outlet temperature T₂ of the second rolling stand

$T_2=T_2^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_2/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_2/2\right)}·\frac{K_2\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_2}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}}=103.32+\frac{1-\left(0.45/4\right)}{1-\left(0.45/2\right)}·\frac{400\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-0.45}\right)}{7800·0.47·1}=182.52^{\circ }C.;$

S8.10, determining whether the in-equation i<n is established: if yes, enabling i=i+1, and then turning to step S8.3; otherwise, turning to step S8.11;

S8.11, obtaining the outlet temperature T_i=1175.86,179.36,189.77,196.65,207.541° C. of each rolling stand;

S9, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function F(X);

S9.1, calculating the dynamic viscosity η_0i of an emulsion between roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein η_0i=b·exp(−a·T_i), in the formula, a,b are the dynamic viscosity parameters of lubricating oil under atmospheric pressure, and it can be obtained from a=0.15, b=3.0 that η_0i={5.45,5.78,5.65,5.75,5.89};

S9.2, calculating the oil film thickness ξ_i between the roll gaps of each rolling stand according to the following formula:

${\xi }_i=\frac{h_{0i}+h_{1i}}{2h_{0i}}·k_c·\frac{3\theta {\eta }_{0i}\left(v_{\mathrm{ri}}+v_{0i}\right)}{{\alpha }_i\left[1-e^{-\theta \left(K-\frac{T_{0i}}{h_{0i}·B}\right)}\right]}-k_{rg}·\left(1+K_{rs}\right)·{\mathrm{Ra}}_{\mathrm{ir}0}·e^{-B_{\mathrm{Li}}·L_i}$

wherein in the formula, k_rg represents the coefficient of the strength of entrainment of lubricant by the longitudinal surface roughness of the work roll and the strip steel, k_rg=1.196, and K_rs represents the impression rate, that is, the ratio of transferring the surface roughness of the working roll to the strip, K_rs=0.584, from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i={0.795,0.967,2.132,2.056,1.337} um;

S9.3, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function:

$\{\begin{array}{c}F\left(X\right)=\frac{\lambda }{n}\sum _{i=1}^n\sqrt{{\left({\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\right)}^2}+\left(1-\lambda \right)\max {\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\\ {\xi }_i^{-}<{\xi }_i<{\xi }_i^{+}\end{array}\hspace{1em}$

in the formula, X={w_i} is the optimization variable, λ=0.5 is the distribution coefficient, and thus F(X)=0.98;

S10, enabling w_i^y=w_i={900,900,900,900,900} L 1 min if F(X)=0.98<F₀=1×10¹⁰ is established, F₀=F(X)=0.98, turning to step S11, wherein in the subsequent x calculation processes, the corresponding F(X) is obtained with the change of w_i, and the x^th F₀ is the x−1^th F(X). If the x^th F(X) is smaller than the x−1^th F(X), it is judged that F(X)<F₀ is established and turn to step S11;

S11, determining whether the emulsion flow rate w_i exceeds the feasible region range. If yes, turning to step S12; otherwise, turning to step S7; and

S12, outputting an optimal emulsion flow rate set value w_i^y={1029,1055,1261,1703,1109} L/min.

Embodiment 3

In order to further explain the application process of the related technology of the present application, the application process of an emulsion flow optimization method for a cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression is described by taking a 1220 cold continuous rolling mill in a cold rolling plant as an example.

An emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill includes the following steps:

S1, collecting device feature parameters of the cold continuous rolling mill, wherein the 1220 cold continuous rolling mill in a cold rolling plant has 5 rolling stands in total, and the device feature parameters mainly include: the radius R_i={208,210,227,226,225} mm of a working roll of each rolling stand, the surface linear velocity ν_ri={176,317,495,789,1146} m/min of a roll of each rolling stand, the original roughness Ra_ir0={0.9,0.9,0.7,0.7,0.8} um of a working roll of each rolling stand, the roughness attenuation coefficient B_L=0.01 of a working roll, the distance l=2700 mm between rolling stands, and the rolling kilometer L_i={152,102,215,165,70} km after roll change of a working roll of each rolling stand, wherein i is 1, 2, . . . , n, and represents the ordinal number of rolling stands of the cold continuous rolling mill, and n=5 is the total number of rolling stands, the same below;

S2, collecting key rolling process parameters of a strip, wherein the key rolling process parameters mainly include: the inlet thickness h_0i={1.8,1.05,0.57,0.39,0.25} mm of each rolling stand, the outlet thickness h_1i={1.05,0.57,0.36,0.22,0.13} mm of each rolling stand, strip width B=876 mm, the inlet speed ν_0i={104,185,337,546,844} m/min of each rolling stand, the outlet speed ν_1i={188,337,548,845,1201}m/min of each rolling stand, the inlet temperature T₁^r=110° C., strip deformation resistance K_i={355,395,476,580,640} MPa of each rolling stand, rolling pressure P_i={12900,11200,10400,9600,8900} kN of each rolling stand, back tension T_0i={74,141,203,201,219} MPa of each rolling stand, front tension T_1i{140,203,199,224,50} MPa of each rolling stand, emulsion concentration influence coefficient k_c=0.8, pressure-viscosity coefficient θ=0.035 of a lubricant, strip density ρ=7800 kg/m³, specific heat capacity S=0.45 kJ/(kg·° C.) of a strip, emulsion concentration C=3.7%, emulsion temperature T_c=55° C. and thermal-work equivalent J=1;

S3, defining process parameters involved in the process of emulsion flow optimization, wherein the process parameters mainly include that an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁺ each rolling stand is and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁺, an under-lubrication film thickness critical value ξ_i⁻ is and the friction coefficient at this time is u_i⁻, the rolling reduction amount is Δh_i=h_0i−h_1i, the rolling reduction rate is

${\varepsilon }_i=\frac{\Delta h_i}{h_{0i}},$

the inlet temperature of each rolling stand is T_i^r, the distance l=2700 mm between the rolling stands is evenly divided into m=30 sections, and the temperature in the sections is represented by T_i,j (wherein, 1≤j≤m), and T_i^r=T_i−1,m, the over-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁺, and the under-lubrication judgment coefficient is A⁻;

S4, setting the initial set value of an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function of a cold continuous rolling mill that aims to achieve vibration suppression as F₀=1.0×10¹⁰;

S5, calculating the bite angle α_i of each rolling stand according to the rolling theory, wherein the calculation formula is

${\alpha }_i=\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}},$

from which it can be obtained that α_i={0.0546,0.0406,0.0247,0.0220,0.0179};

S6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i of each rolling stand;

S6.1, calculating the neutral angle γ_i of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation formula is

${\gamma }_i=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}\left[1+\frac{1}{2u_i}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)\right];$

S6.2, calculating to obtain u_i⁺={0.0242,0.0179,0.0127,0.0130,0.0185} according to the formula

$u_i^{+}=\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{+}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{+}=1,$

the roll gap is just in an over-lubrication state;

S6.3, calculating an over-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁺ each rolling stand according to the relationship formula between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, i.e. u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi (in the formula, a_i is the liquid friction influence coefficient, a_i=0.0125, b_i is the dry friction influence coefficient, b_i=0.1414, and B_i is the friction coefficient attenuation index, B_i=−2.4280), wherein the calculation formula is

${\xi }_i^{+}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{+}-a_i}{b_i},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i⁻={1.001,1.289,2.232,2.037,1.268} um;

S6.4, calculating to obtain u_i⁻={0.1241,0.0922,0.0610,0.0630,0.0935} according to the formula

$u_i^{-}\frac{1}{2\left(2A^{-}-1\right)}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Delta h_i}{R_i^{\prime }}}+\frac{T_{i0}-T_{i1}}{P_i}\right)$

from steps S5 and S6.1 assuming that when

$\frac{{\gamma }_i}{{\alpha }_i}=A^{-}=0.6,$

the roll gap is just in an under-lubrication state;

S6.5, calculating an under-lubrication film thickness critical value of ξ_i⁻ each rolling stand according to the relationship between the friction coefficient and the oil film thickness, i.e. u_i=a_i+b_i·e^Bi·ξi, wherein the calculation formula is

${\xi }_i^{-}=\frac{1}{B_i}\ln \frac{u_i^{-}-a_i}{b_i},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i⁻:={0.097,0.223,0.398,0.385,0.210} um;

S6.6, calculating the vibration determination index reference value ξ_0i, wherein

${\xi }_{0i}=\frac{{\xi }_i^{+}+{\xi }_i^{-}}{2},$

from which it can be obtained that: ξ_0i={0.548,0.762,1.321,1.207,0.736};

S7, setting the emulsion flow rate of each rolling stand to be w_i={900,900,900,900,900} L/min;

S8, calculating the strip outlet temperature T_i of each rolling stand,

S8.1, calculating the outlet temperature T₁ of the first rolling stand,

$T_1=T_1^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_1/2\right)}·\frac{K_1\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_1}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}}=110+\frac{1-\left(0.43/4\right)}{1-\left(0.43/2\right)}·\frac{360\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-0.43}\right)}{7.8·0.47·1}=169.96°C.$

S8.2, enabling i=1;

S8.3, calculating the temperature T_1,1, of the first section of strip behind the outlet of the first rolling stand, i.e. T_i,1=T_i=169.96° C.;

S8.4, enabling j=2;

S8.5, showing the relationship between the temperature of the j^th section and the temperature of the j−1^th section by the following equation:

$T_{i,j}=-\frac{2k_0{w}_i^{0.264}\exp \left(9.45-0.1918C.\right)\times 1.163l}{v_{1i}{h}_{1i}\rho Sm}{T}_{i,j-1}^{-0.213}\left(T_{i,j-1}-T_c\right)+T_{i,j-1},$

wherein k₀=1.0;

S8.6, determining whether the in-equation j<m is established: if yes, enabling j=j+1. and then turning to step S8.5; otherwise, turning to step S8.7;

S8.7, obtaining the temperature T_1,30=101.25° C. of the m=30^th section by iterative calculation finally;

S8.8, calculating the inlet temperature T₂^r of the second rolling stand: T₂^r=T_1,m=101.25° C.;

S8.9, calculating the outlet temperature T₂ of the second rolling stand:

$T_2=T_2^r+\frac{1-\left({\varepsilon }_2/4\right)}{1-\left({\varepsilon }_2/2\right)}·\frac{K_2\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-{\varepsilon }_2}\right)}{\rho \mathrm{SJ}}=103.32+\frac{1-\left(0.45/4\right)}{1-\left(0.45/2\right)}·\frac{400\ln \left(\frac{1}{1-0.45}\right)}{7800·0.47·1}=175.86°C.;$

S8.10, determining whether the in-equation i<n is established: if yes, enabling i=i+1, and then turning to step S8.3; otherwise, turning to step S8.11;

S8.11, obtaining the outlet temperature T_i={177.96,172.78,184.59,191.77,203.33}° C. of each rolling stand;

S9, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function F(X);

S9.1, calculating the dynamic viscosity η_0i of an emulsion between roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein η_0i=b·exp(−a·T_i), in the formula, a,b are the dynamic viscosity parameter of lubricating oil under atmospheric pressure, and it can be obtained from a=0.15, b=2.0 that η_0i={5.45,5.02,5.98,5.45,5.76};

S9.2, calculating the oil film thickness ξ_i between the roll gaps of each rolling stand according to the following formula:

${\xi }_i=\frac{h_{0i}+h_{1i}}{2h_{0i}}·k_c·\frac{3\theta {\eta }_{0i}\left(v_{\mathrm{ri}}+v_{0i}\right)}{{\alpha }_i\left[1-e^{-\theta \left(K-\frac{T_{0i}}{h_{0i}·B}\right)}\right]}-k_{rg}·\left(1+K_{rs}\right)·{\mathrm{Ra}}_{\mathrm{ir}0}·e^{-B_{\mathrm{Li}}·L_i}$

wherein in the formula, k_rg represents the coefficient of the strength of entrainment of lubricant by the longitudinal surface roughness of the work roll and the strip steel, k_rg=1.165, and K_rs represents the impression rate, that is, the ratio of transferring the surface roughness of the working roll to the strip, k_rs=0.566, from which it can be obtained that: ξ_i={0.774,0.926,2.088,2.032,1.318} um;

S9.3, calculating an emulsion flow rate comprehensive optimization objective function:

$\{\begin{array}{c}F\left(X\right)=\frac{\lambda }{n}\sum _{i=1}^n\sqrt{{\left({\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\right)}^2}+\left(1-\lambda \right)\max {\xi }_i-{\xi }_{0i}\\ {\xi }_i^{-}<{\xi }_i<{\xi }_i^{+}\end{array}\hspace{1em}$

In the formula, X={w_i} is the optimization variable, λ=0.5 is the distribution coefficient, and thus F(X)=0.91;

S10, enabling w_i^y=w_i={900,900,900,900,900} L/min if F(X)=0.91<F₀=1×10¹⁰ is established, F₀=F(X)=0.91, turning to step S11, wherein in the subsequent x calculation processes, the corresponding F(X) is obtained with the change of w_i, and the x^th F₀ is the x−1^th F(X). If the x^th F(X) is smaller than the x−1^th F(X), it is judged that F(X)<F₀ is established and turn to step S11;

S11, determining whether the emulsion flow rate w_i exceeds the feasible region range. If yes, turning to step S12; otherwise, turning to step S7; and

S12, outputting an optimal emulsion flow rate set value w_i^y={1016,1040,1266,1681,1111} L/min.

The invention is applied to the five-machine-frame cold continuous rolling mills 1730, 1420 and 1220 in the cold rolling plant. According to the production experience of the cold rolling plant, the solution of the invention is feasible, and the effect is very obvious. The invention can be further applied to other cold continuous rolling mills, and the popularization prospect is relatively broad.

To sum up, the technical solution of the invention is adopted, and the emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of the cold continuous rolling mill fully combines the device and process features of the cold continuous rolling mill, and aiming at the vibration defect problem, starting from the comprehensive optimization setting of the emulsion flow rate of each rolling stand, the method changes the previous idea of constant emulsion flow control for each rolling stand of the cold continuous rolling mill, and obtains the optimal set value of the emulsion flow rate for each rolling stand that aims to achieve vibration suppression by optimization; and the method greatly reduces the incidence of rolling mill vibration defects, improves production efficiency and product quality, and brings greater economic benefits for enterprises; and achieves the treatment for rolling mill vibration defects, and improves the surface quality and rolling process stability of a finished strip of a cold continuous rolling mill.

Claims

1. An emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill, characterized by comprising the following steps: (S1) collecting device feature parameters of the cold continuous rolling mill, wherein the device feature parameters comprise: the radius Ri of a working roll of each rolling stand, the surface linear velocity νri of a roll of each rolling stand, the original roughness Rair0 of a working roll of each rolling stand, roughness attenuation coefficient BL of a working roll, the distance l between rolling stands, and the rolling kilometer Li after roll change of a working roll of each rolling stand, wherein i is 1, 2, . . . , n, and represents the ordinal number of the rolling stands of the cold continuous rolling mill, and n is the total number of rolling stands;(S2) collecting key rolling process parameters of a strip, wherein the key rolling process parameters comprise: the inlet thickness h0i of each rolling stand, the outlet thickness h1i of each rolling stand, strip width B, the inlet speed ν0i of each rolling stand, the outlet speed ν1i of each rolling stand, the inlet temperature T1r, strip deformation resistance Ki of each rolling stand, rolling pressure Pi of each rolling stand, back tension T0i of each rolling stand, front tension T1i of each rolling stand, emulsion concentration influence coefficient kc, pressure-viscosity coefficient θ of a lubricant, strip density ρ, specific heat capacity S of a strip, emulsion concentration C, emulsion temperature Tc and thermal-work equivalent J;(S3) defining process parameters involved in the emulsion flow optimization process, wherein the process parameters comprise an over-lubrication film thickness critical value ξi+ of each rolling stand, the friction coefficient ui+ at this time, an under-lubrication film thickness critical value ξi− and the friction coefficient ui− at this time, the rolling reduction amount Δhi (wherein Δhi=h0i−h1i), the rolling reduction rate εi (wherein

2. The emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill according to claim 1, characterized in that, the step S6 comprises the following steps: (S6.1) calculating the neutral angle γi of each rolling stand:

3. The emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill according to claim 2, characterized in that, the step S8 comprises the following steps: (S8.1) calculating the outlet temperature T1 of the first rolling stand, wherein

4. The emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill according to claim 3, characterized in that, the step S9 comprises the following steps: (S9.1) calculating the dynamic viscosity η0i of an emulsion between roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein η0i=b·exp(−a·Ti), and in the formula, a,b are dynamic viscosity parameters of lubricating oil under the atmospheric pressure;(S9.2) calculating the oil film thickness ξi between roll gaps of each rolling stand, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:

5. The emulsion flow optimization method for suppressing vibration of a cold continuous rolling mill according to claim 3, characterized in that, 0.8<k0<1.2.