The present invention generally relates to a system and method for enabling blind and visually impaired people to interact with a physical document and to have access to information printed on a physical document.
Accessibility
In broad terms, accessibility is the ability for a user to access and use information and technology even if this user operates in constrained conditions. Information and technology can be accessible through appropriate specialized technical interfaces. The present invention is directed to a technology to enable visually impaired and blind people to access information printed on physical documents.
Many groups, in governments, private industries and universities, are working on ways to guarantee universal access to the on-line world for all individuals in society. This social movement, combined with a strong push to provide a better accessibility in the workplace, drives an urgent call for new technologies.
As information technology (IT) penetrates all commercial and public transactions and communications, it is important to ensure accessibility to everyone. Governments have begun to define new regulations and standards to enable people with disabilities to easily access information technology. For instance, in the US, the federal, state and local governments have initiated a legislation requiring computer technology to be accessible to people with disabilities. More particularly, in June 2001, the U.S. Federal Government has implemented a legislation known as “Section 508”. Section 508 has changed the rules of the game on how the government must buy information technology and in particular “accessible” IT.
Countries have established regulations that require accessibility at some level, other countries are in the process of developing such regulations. In addition, international organizations are working to develop accessibility standards.
Accessibility Aids for Blind People
For someone who is completely unable to use a normal screen or read a printed text, there are two alternatives: Braille reading or speech. Currently available assistance for blind and visually impaired people comprises a wide range of technical solutions, including document scanners and enlargers, interactive speech software and cognitive tools, screen reader software and screen enlargement programs.
Reading manuals and reports at work, textbooks at school, and menus at restaurants, and more generally reading printed material at any time and in any place is part of daily life. The present invention is based on the following observation: it is easier and quicker for sighted people to turn over pages of a book than to browse electronic pages on a computer screen. It would be an improvement to provide a similar capability to blind and visually impaired people. For instance, it would be a real improvement for blind people to have the possibility to access information printed on a physical document directly from this physical document.
When we compare paper based information with computer based information, paper has a number of useful properties that computers cannot provide. For instance:
Many electronic systems attempt to replace paper. They offer, for instance, a better access to multimedia services. However, most users prefer to work with paper and it is difficult to foresee, in a near future, a general and massive replacement of paper books by electronic books (e.g., by Web accessible e-books).
Publication entitled “The Last Book”, IBM Systems Journal, Vol 36, No. 3-1997, by J. Jacobson, B. Comiskey, C. Turner, J. Albert, and P. Tsao of the MIT Media Laboratory, compares printed books and computer screens in the following terms:
Publication entitled “A Comparison of Reading Paper and On-Line Documents”, O'Hara and Sellen, XRCE: Technical Report: EPC-1997-101, Xerox Co. summarizes a study comparing reading from paper to reading on-line. As reported in this article:
As reported in an article entitled “Paper is still with us”, by Ph. Jane Benson—The Journal of Electronic Publishing, published by the University of Michigan Press—
Also, in the article entitled “Electronic Journals: What do users think of them ?”, by Dr Cliff McKnight, Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicester LE11 3TU, UK, we can read:
Sighted people can browse very easily through paper catalogs, magazines, newspapers, maps and books by flipping through the pages and by “glancing” at pictures and text. It is also very easy for them to mark and return to specific parts of a physical document. It would be desirable to offer similar possibilities to blind and visually impaired people and in particular to enable these people to easily browse through the same paper catalogs, magazines, newspapers, maps and books, and to easily “access” (receive and hear) information related to pictures and text printed on pages of these documents.
The convenience and usefulness of a system for enabling blind and visually impaired people to access information directly from hard-copy documents, to turn over pages and to manually search for text, is well illustrated by in the following article entitled “Talking Books Speak Volumes”, by Kendra Mayfield, Wired News, Jul. 13, 2000,
In fact audio tapes have a drawback which is similar to the drawback experienced when we scroll computer screens: the user can only go forward or backwards. The possibilities of navigation are very limited. It is difficult for people with visual impairments, to use audio books or screen readers the same way sighted people do. For instance, looking up a recipe or searching for a gardening tip on an audio tape or on a long electronic book is extremely tedious and time consuming.
Nowadays, digital audio books are designed to make published documents accessible and navigable for to blind or visually impaired persons. The ANSI/NISO Z39.86 standard, defines a format and content for an electronic file set that comprises a digital audio book and establishes a limited set of requirements for digital audio books playback devices. It uses established and new specifications to delineate the structure of digital audio books whose content can range from text with corresponding spoken audio, to audio with little or no text. However, if a sighted user of a physical book wishes to discuss a particular section of such this book with a blind user, the blind user must actively search for a digital copy of the same edition of the book and then must search for the relevant section. There is a need to enable individuals familiar with paper documents to continue to use those same documents as they age and their vision may be deteriorating. There is also a need to provide a mechanism by which the text of a familiar physical document may be supplemented by speech output or display of a more easily readable version of the text.
One of the characteristics of the publishing industry is that most publications can be delivered in a digital form. In some cases, the digital form has really supplanted the physical one. In other cases, the digital form appears complementary to the physical one. However, in most cases, the physical form is till dominant. In fact, in terms of business models, with the exception of journals and directories, which tend to follow a subscription model, most publishers have been unable to create profitable digital products and services, able to generate significant incomes. Digital audio books represent an important improvement compared to traditional analog audio books. For instance, digital audio books provide access to virtually stored information, offer improved navigation capabilities, allow the use of keywords for searching and directly accessing text in electronic books. However, due to a relatively limited number of vision impaired users, the cost of such digital audio books remains relatively high. It results from this that a very small number of titles are published both, as printed books and as digital audio books.
The necessity of using a natural friendly interface for having access to information has been precisely summarized by Ann Light, in the article entitled “Fourteen Users in Search of a Newspaper: the Effect of Expectation on Online Behaviour”, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, CSRP507,
“People expect the friendly familiar paradigm of media to guide them through uncharted territories of information”.
According to prior art, electronic reading machines using computer-based optical character recognition (OCR) are widely used to help visually impaired people and people with reading difficulties to read information on paper documents. An electronic reading machine basically comprises
Usually, a method for electronically reading a printed document comprises the following steps:
Currently, reading machines are provided by a variety of companies, including IBM, Telesensory, Arkenstone and Kurzweil Educational Systems. Unfortunately, electronic reading machines suffer from a variety of functional and operational deficiencies that limit their usefulness. For instance:
As a result, even for an experienced user, it can take more than a minute before an electronic reading machine can read a single scanned page. During of after the reading, errors must be corrected. The process is repeated for every page in the document.
Since scanners are limited in size, another drawback concerning electronic reading machines is the reading of pages with large formats (a newspaper page for instance). Such pages cannot be scanned in one pass but require multiple passes.
Moreover, a complete electronic reading system with a computer, a scanner, and speech hardware and software is bulky and non portable.
It is clear that reading a text on a paper document by means of an electronic reading machine involves complex manipulations and time consuming operations. However, there are other important deficiencies that limit in practice the acceptance and usefulness of electronic reading machines. Basically, the tasks required for using these electronic reading machines are far to be “natural”. Reading physical documents by means of an electronic reading machine, has nothing in common with the automatic “natural” way of reading practiced by sighted people.
A mobile scanning pen comprising an optical character recognition function, can also be used for producing a digital version of a printed document. Wizcom's Quicklink Pen Personal Scanner is an example of such pen. However, scanning printed words using such a pen can be rapidly tedious and laborious. Each line must be individually (and accurately) scanned and a reasonable visual acuity is required. The present invention does not require a good vision, as only two physical markers are required to define the part of the document that must be read.
As a conclusion, it is important to enable blind people to easily and conveniently access information comprised in hard-copy publications that are read everyday by sighted people.
It is an object of the invention to enable a blind or visually impaired person, as well as a person with reading disabilities, to access information printed on a physical document and information related to this printed information.
It is another object of the invention to enable a blind or visually impaired person to access information directly from a physical document without using an electronic reading machine based on a page scanner and/or an optical character recognition (OCR).
It is another object of the invention to enable a blind or visually impaired person to easily select a part of a physical document simply by touching (e.g., with the fingertip or with a pen) this physical document.
It is a further object of the present invention to enable a blind or visually impaired person to take a physical document, to open it at any page, to select with a finger or a pen a part of this page and to hear the text of the selected part.
It is also an object of the present invention to enable both magnification and electronic reading of a selected part of a physical document.
It is a further object of the present invention to enable a person, after having selected a part of a printed document comprising text and images, to hear the text, to receive descriptions of images, and to access multimedia information or services related to said printed text and images.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a system that, apart from providing to a blind or visually impaired person, an access to information directly from a physical document, can also be used for many other applications in the daily life, such as helping children to read, enabling people with reading difficulties to read, enabling sighted people to read in the dark, enabling people with a poor vision to read small print on paper documents.
It is a further object of the present invention to enable individuals familiar with paper documents to continue to use the same documents as they age and their vision may be deteriorating and to supplement the text of a familiar physical document by speech output or display of a more easily readable version of the text.
As defined in independent claims, the invention relates generally to a method, a system and a computer program for enabling a blind or visually impaired person, to access information printed on a physical document, directly from said physical document, simply by pointing and touching a desired part of said document. More particularly, the method comprises the steps of:
Further embodiments of the invention are provided in the appended dependent claims.
The novel and inventive features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative detailed embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The invention itself, as well as a preferred mode of use, objects and advantages thereof, can be understood by reference to the following illustrative embodiment described by the accompanying drawings.
The present invention addresses different problems that may arise in reading text, particularly problems that affect visually impaired persons or persons who cannot see or read correctly (e.g., in low light conditions). For instance:
The present invention allows a blind reader to receive an audible transcription of a selected part of a physical document (for example an audible transcription of a selected text in book).
The present invention also discloses a method for selecting a part of a physical document simply by pressing with a fingertip or a pen a touch foil placed over said document; for identifying data associated with this selected part in a database comprising an electronic copy of the document; for extracting text from said data and for converting this text into speech.
The present invention is directed to a method for use in a user system connected to a network, for retrieving from a server, an electronic copy of a physical document, and information related to said document, and for playing, displaying, reading and/or magnifying on the screen of this user system, the retrieved electronic copy and information related to said document. The method comprises the steps of:
As shown in
The physical document (101) can be of any kind, for example, a newspaper, a legal document, a geographic map, a fiction novel, an academic text book, a technical book, a commercial catalog or even any other type of engraved, written, or printed surface. The material of the document can be paper, plastic, wood or any other material. For identifying the selected document (101) to the system, a bar code (107) is printed or attached at a well known position on the physical document (e.g., on the front cover, back cover or first page). In the embodiment of the invention shown in
In an alternate embodiment of the invention, a physical document can be specifically produced for the purpose of accessing information from a tactile system. Compared to the original paper document, this physical document can have a different form, to include, for instance, tactile indications (in Braille, for example) related to the structure and pages of the document. With such a tactile document or book, a blind user can quickly and independently navigate in the document, and can easily mark the sections of text he wish to hear. In this embodiment, to select the same part of text, the server determines from the points selected by the user on the physical document, the corresponding points in the original paper document.
Touch Foil
The touch foil (102) may be made of transparent resistive or capacitive films of the type used commonly to manufacture touch screens. The generated signal is generally proportional to the coordinates of the point pressed. One example of touch foil it is possible to use is the TouchTek4 (4-wire Analog Resistive Touchscreens) of MICRO TOUCH company (TouchTek™ is a trademark of the MICRO TOUCH Company).
1
TouchTek4 touchscreens feature hard-coated polyester topsheets, available in several surface finishes. Spacer dots are available in several dot arrays, optimized for finger, pen and finger, or pen-only input. Electronic control is provided by a serial controller, or by 4-wire controllers. TouchTek4's specifications include narrow inactive border areas and compact touch sensors which allow system designers and OEMs to provide the largest useable screen area and full mouse emulation without sacrificing functionality or consuming excess power. Apart from being suited for implementing the functions of this invention, TouchTek4 touchscreens are commonly used in hand-held personal information management systems, PDAs, mobile computing systems, automotive, diagnostics and telecom devices, and Internet appliances. TouchTek4 touchscreens are engineered to accept more than three million touches to any area of the screen.
Barcode Reader
The barcode reader (103), connected to user workstation (104) is used to identify the documents and pages of the documents selected by the user. One example of barcode reader it is possible to use, is the PenWAND© ComputerWare. The PenWAND is a combination of barcode reader and light pen in one hand-held instrument. This is an ideal solution for applications requiring reading of barcodes and screen selection.
User Workstation
In the embodiment of the invention illustrated in
The user workstation (104) is, for example, an Internet appliance, a multimedia Personal Computer (PC), a game console, a cell phone . . . . The touch foil (102) communicates with the user workstation by means of a cable, a wire pair, an infrared link, or a wireless link. In a particular embodiment, the user workstation (104) is connected to a communication network (105), preferably the Internet network and comprises a Web Browser application.
Server
The server (106) is primarily the repository where electronic representations (900) of physical documents (700) are stored. Each electronic representation is associated with a physical document (or publication) by means of the barcode printed on this physical document. The electronic representation of a document includes an exact copy or replica of the original document. This copy includes, for instance, scanned images of pages.
The electronic representation may also include text, text descriptions of graphical elements (such as charts, graphs or illustrations). The server also provides users with additional information such as:
As shown in
The method comprises the steps of:
The bar code gives access, on the server (106), to information related to the selected physical document, such as:
This information about the selected physical document is transmitted from the server (106) to the user workstation (204) as a text file. This text file is then converted to electronic voice (205) by means of a text-to-speech software operating on the user workstation.
The user workstation can also receive from the server (106) operational instructions (206) for locating page numbers barcodes on the pages of the selected physical document or publication (e.g., “Page number codes are located on bottom left and bottom right corners of pages”). These operational instructions are transmitted to the user by means of the text-to-speech software operating on the user workstation.
1
Alternate embodiments for identifying pages of a document exists and can be used with the present invention. An example is given by a document having page numbers printed as text. It is possible to identify a page of the document by scanning on the page the place where the page number is printed. A scanning device can be integrated with the barcode scanner described previously. The scanning device can also be used separately like the Quicklink Pen Personal Scanner described in the specifications of the present application.
The selection of a part of a physical document using a touch foil, can be done according to various forms. For example, in a particular embodiment of the invention, if the user touches a single point on the touch foil and then presses the READ key, this operation is equivalent to a command for reading the full document from this point (possibly until the user presses a STOP READ reserved key on the user workstation keyboard). Also, if the user selects a first page and indicates a first point on this first page, and then selects a second page and indicates a second point on this second page, and then presses the READ key, this operation is equivalent to a command for reading the document from the first point selected on the first page to the second point selected on the second page. It is now apparent that other arrangements can be implemented by those skilled in the art for correlating a plurality of points selected by a user with a part of a physical document.
In the example illustrated in
http://www.virgin.net/170301/?&Page=16&Xf=27&Yf=43&Xt=152&Yt=168
specifies:
In the example illustrated in
It is important to note that different methods can be used to determine, from the coordinates of the points selected (701), (702) on the touch foil, the text data (903) that must be must be extracted from the electronic copy (from point 901 to point 902). In the example illustrated in
The server can also receive from the user workstation a HTTP request (such as “&format=magnifyOriginal”) to view a magnified image of a part of the original document. The server sends back a reply including an image of the selected part of the same format and appearance than the original document. This image is magnified on the display of the user workstation.
The information returned by the server (806) in reply to the request (807) received from user workstation (804) can be different than the exact transcription (as a text file) of the data printed on the physical document. In fact, nothing prevents the server (806), to reply with any kind of multimedia information (e.g., a combination of a long text description with music or songs). This multimedia information can be linked (or even hyperlinked) with different parts of the physical document that the user can select. Therefore, the invention is not limited to a mechanism for reading (i.e., for speaking by means of text-to-speech transcription) text printed on a physical document to a blind user, but the invention is also directed to a mechanism for accessing from a physical document, all kinds of multimedia information or services available on the Web
What has been described is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Other arrangements and methods can be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03368035 | Apr 2003 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation application claiming priority to Ser. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,165,478, issued Oct. 20, 2015.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4644339 | Ruder | Feb 1987 | A |
4996707 | O'Malley et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5223828 | McKiel, Jr. | Jun 1993 | A |
5267331 | Siwoff | Nov 1993 | A |
5287102 | Mckiel, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5325123 | Bettinardi | Jun 1994 | A |
5359675 | Siwoff | Oct 1994 | A |
5374924 | McKiel, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5386494 | White | Jan 1995 | A |
5400434 | Pearson | Mar 1995 | A |
5412189 | Cragun | May 1995 | A |
5461416 | Bettinardi | Oct 1995 | A |
5511148 | Wellner | Apr 1996 | A |
5561736 | Moore et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5586196 | Sussman | Dec 1996 | A |
5617507 | Lee et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630060 | Tang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633674 | Trulaske et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634084 | Malsheen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5664210 | Fleming | Sep 1997 | A |
5686960 | Sussman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694256 | Winkler | Dec 1997 | A |
5715412 | Aritsuka et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5814979 | Schulhof et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875428 | Kurzweil | Feb 1999 | A |
5900908 | Kirkland | May 1999 | A |
5960448 | Reichek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982370 | Kamper | Nov 1999 | A |
6018710 | Wynblatt et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052663 | Kurzweil | Apr 2000 | A |
6084556 | Zwem | Jul 2000 | A |
6085161 | MacKenty | Jul 2000 | A |
6088675 | MacKenty et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6115482 | Sears | Sep 2000 | A |
6127990 | Zwem | Oct 2000 | A |
6184847 | Fateh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6289304 | Grefenstette | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308151 | Smith | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324511 | Kiraly | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6385581 | Stephenson | May 2002 | B1 |
6442523 | Siegel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446041 | Reynar | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6640010 | Seeger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6683631 | Carroll | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6731315 | Ma et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6731326 | Bettinardi | May 2004 | B1 |
6766069 | Dance | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6823184 | Nelson | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6892352 | Myers | May 2005 | B1 |
6940491 | Carro | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6980202 | Carro | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999066 | Litwiller | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000189 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013279 | Nelson | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027038 | Carro | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032171 | Carroll | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7106220 | Gourgey | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7139445 | Pilu | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7181692 | Siegel | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194411 | Slotznick et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212318 | Bradbery | May 2007 | B2 |
7472338 | Carro | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473670 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
9165478 | Carro et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9684676 | Page | Jun 2017 | B1 |
20010056439 | Carro | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056463 | Grady | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003469 | Gupta | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020047870 | Carro | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069223 | Goodisman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069240 | Berk | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087598 | Carro | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101447 | Carro | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020102966 | Lev | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020152236 | Carro | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156866 | Schneider | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174271 | Tanigawa | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178007 | Slotznick | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184188 | Mandyam | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191847 | Newman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030037031 | Birder | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046082 | Siegel | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069977 | Heiden | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030103238 | MacLean | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117378 | Carro | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117379 | Carro | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030187886 | Hull | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191852 | Carro | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030234763 | Hejza Litwiller | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040021648 | Blume | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034832 | Taylor | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040091842 | Carro | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122811 | Page | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040158717 | Cox | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199874 | Larson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205605 | Adler | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050028092 | Carro | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050076300 | Martinez | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114772 | Talley | May 2005 | A1 |
20050234851 | King | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20150242096 | Carro | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance (Jun. 9, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. 1564. |
Kendra Mayfield, Talking Books Speak Volumes, Wired News, Feb. 23, 2007, retrieved from internet: http://www.wired.com/news/gizmos/0,1452,375,00.html, 4 pages. |
Philippa Jane Benson, Paper is Still With Us, The Journal of Electronic Publishing, University of Michigan Press, Feb. 23, 2007, 7 pages, http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-02/benson0702.htm/. |
Dr. Cliff Mcknight, Electronic Journals: What Do Users Think of Them?, Department of information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leics LE11 3TU, UK, Feb. 23, 2007, http:scholar.google.com/scholar?q=casch:edXCCig2FZQJ:www.dl.ulis.ac.jp/ISDL97/pro . . . , 7 pages. |
IBM TDB: Light pen to use with a transparent electro-luminiscent display; IP.com No. IPCOM000016405D, Original Publication Date: Nov. 30, 2002, 3 pages, http://www.ip.com/pubview/IPCOM000016405D. |
O'Hara et al., A Comparison of Reading Paper and On-Line Documents, 8 pages, To appeal in Proceedings of CIII '97, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta,GA. |
Kellami et al., Children with visual impairment and their reading: a comparison between reading from paper and computer screen, Apr. 6, 2007, retrieved from internet: http://web.archive.org/web/20010715030158/http://www.bham.ac.uk/RCEVH/Projects/text.htm, 5 pages. |
Lucent Technologies, bell laboratories projects, Welcome to Our Multilingual Text-to-Speech Systems, Feb. 23, 2007, retrieved from internet: http://www.bell-labs.com/project/tts/index.html, 3 pages. |
Ann Light, Fourteen Users in Search of a Newspaper: the Effect of Expectation on Online Behaviour, 21 pages, Mar. 23, 2007, retrieved from internet: http://archive.org/web/20050411045045/www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/users/annl/Expectations.htm. |
Notice of Allowance (dated Mar. 25, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Reply Brief (Feb. 17, 2012) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Examiner's Answer (Dec. 20, 2011) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Appeal Brief (Oct. 26, 2011) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Advisory Action (dated Aug. 23, 2011) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Final Amendment (dated Jul. 28, 2011) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Final Office Action (dated Apr. 26, 2011) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Amendment (dated Mar. 14, 2011) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Office Action (dated Dec. 13, 2010) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Final Amendment (dated Nov. 16, 2010) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Final Office Action (dated Sep. 16, 2010) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Amendment (dated Jul. 6, 2010) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
Office Action (dated Mar. 5, 2010) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
RCE (May 20, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564. |
312 Amendment (dated May 13, 2015) for U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,810, filed Apr. 15, 2004, Conf. No. 1564 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150242096 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10826810 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 14696815 | US |