This invention pertains to information, and more particularly to easier processing of incoming information.
The need to externally process (in some way) information and convey that information to a user has been around for a long time. For example, blind persons can use canes or Seeing Eye dogs to navigate: these devices translate information that would normally be processed visually into another sense that the blind person can perceive: in this case, the sense of touch.
Military applications of data processing also exist. In the early days of air warfare, the pilot (usually the sole person in the plane, and therefore also responsible for firing the weapons) had to locate enemy planes using the senses of sight and sound. With the advent of detection apparatuses (for example, radar) that extend beyond the pilot's range of vision, the pilot has access to additional information. This information is provided to the pilot using a head's-up display.
But the information provided can often be overwhelming. Even in the early days of air travel, without the development of technologies such as radar, a pilot had a great deal of data he must process visually: visually checking the skies for their current condition; checking instruments for current elevation, the current roll, pitch, and yaw of the aircraft, the speed of the aircraft, current fuel reserves, and so on. Specialized pilots might also have to keep track of additional information: for example, a military pilot needs to know how much weaponry he is still carrying.
The use of head's up displays can reduce the number of different places a pilot has to look at to gather the information he needs. Instead of looking for a particular instrument in the cockpit, the pilot just looks at a particular location on the head's-up display. But as more and more information is conveyed to the pilot, he has to look at more places in the head's-up display to find everything he needs to know, and he has to process all the visual information to understand what the data represents.
A need remains for a way to address these and other problems associated with the prior art.
Consider a soldier in a combat environment. The soldier needs situational awareness. He needs to keep track of the totality of his environment: not simply what he can see in front of him with his eyes. He needs to know where the rest his unit is located, relative to his location. He needs to know how much ammunition he is currently carrying. He needs to know about dangers in his environment: for example, if there are trace chemicals indicating an explosive device is in the vicinity. And so on.
The soldier can survey his environment and keep aware of his teammates' locations by constantly moving his head around, looking in all directions. But this is both tiring and dangerous, as the motion might be noticed by enemies. The soldier can keep track of his ammunition in his head, but this information is easily forgotten in the heat of the battle. And unless his senses are particularly sensitive, he is unlikely to detect dangers in the environment, such as trace chemicals that can be smelled.
An enactive perception device, according to embodiments of the invention, permits a user, such as the soldier, to process information more efficiently. An enactive perception device can use sensory substitution to provide a user with information about his environment. For example, movement behind the soldier can be detected using cameras and infrared sensors; when detected, the soldier can be alerted to the movement by stimulation of a muscle, such as the soldier's trapezius muscle. Chemical sensors can be used to detect chemical traces, which can be translated into tongue stimulation to alert the soldier to the chemical traces. Ammunition status can be determined tracking how many rounds of ammunition have been fired relative to the soldier's original load, and status can be provided by muscle stimulation of the abdomen. And so on.
The advantage of using an enactive perception device is that the soldier can provided with information using different senses. Rather than the soldier having to specifically search for information (e.g., searching the arena for teammates, or checking his remaining ammunition), the information can be determined automatically and provided to the soldier in a manner he can process.
Further, by providing different sensations in different ways, the user automatically knows what information is being conveyed, without having to process the information mentally. To use a different example, fighter pilots get their information via various instruments (e.g., altimeter, fuel gauge, compass, etc.), sometimes in combination with heads-up displays. The fighter pilot then has to mentally process the information he receives visually to identify a particular piece of information. For example, to determine the airplane's current ammunition status in the prior art, the pilot has to visually find the information (either from an instrument in the instrument panel or from a section of the heads-up display). But using an enactive perception device according to embodiments of the invention, the fighter pilot can know when he is running low on ammunition when he feels the muscle stimulation of a particular part of the body (e.g., the abdomen). This sensation is unique: a stimulation of the abdomen would not be confused with a stimulation of another muscle of the body. Thus, the fighter pilot can more quickly process information, via its translation to a different sensation, which avoids the need for the fighter pilot to mentally process the visual information to discern the pertinent data.
From the above discussion, it can be understood that an enactive perception device allows a user to integrate perception and action. An enactive perception device enhances a user's ability to perceive his environment and act on it to change his environment and to perceive the change in faster, richer, and more differentiated ways. An enactive perception device provides contextually relevant information in addition to sensory information, and can utilize all sensory mechanisms available to the user.
An advantage of the enactive perception device is that the enactive perception device can interface with underutilized sensory mechanisms to provide relevant stimulus to the user. An enactive perception device can also provide information that is both local and remote to the user. For example, in the soldier example discussed above, the soldier's ammunition load can be local information, but information about where supporting units (e.g., artillery) might be located can be remote information: for example, provided from headquarters.
An enactive perception device according to embodiments of the invention can include components that are worn by the user as part of armor or a uniform, as discussed above. But it is equally viable for the enactive perception device to be something that the user contacts, but is not worn. For example, an enactive perception device can be fitted into the steering wheel and car set of an automobile, providing the user with information only when the user is touching the steering wheel or the car seat. Such an enactive perception device can provide the user with information about traffic conditions, and suggest a direction to travel. For example, when the time is right for the user to make a turn, the enactive perception device can stimulate a muscle on the appropriate side of the body or the steering wheel, indicating the direction to turn. Such an enactive perception device can provide complementary information to a navigation device.
An enactive perception device according to embodiments of the invention can also provide information that is dependent on other factors. For example, an enactive perception device can include a wrist band or other sensor device. The location of the wrist band or sensor device can indicate what information should be provided. If the wrist band or sensor device is in front of the user's body, the enactive perception device can provide prospective information; if the wrist band or sensor device is behind the user's body, the enactive perception device can provide retrospective information. The relative location of the wrist band or sensor device can be determined using any desired technology: for example, Bluetooth® technology can be used to determine the relative location of the wrist band or sensor device to the user's body. (Bluetooth is a registered trademark of Bluetooth SIG, Inc.)
Machine 105 includes data receiver 130, converter 135, and sensory input devices 140 and 145. Data receiver 130 can receive data from a data source. Converter 135 can convert the data into a sensory input form, which can then be provided to sensory input devices 140 and 145. A user wearing sensory input devices 140 and 145 can then receive the data as sensory input.
The reader will understand that
Although
While
Information from both local environment sensor layer 415 and remote environment sensor layer 420 is forwarded to sensory processor 425, and then to sensory translator interface 430. (The combination of sensory processor 425 and sensory translator interface can form converter 135 as described with reference to
The following discussion is intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable machine in which certain aspects of the invention may be implemented. Typically, the machine includes a system bus to which is attached processors, memory, e.g., random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), or other state preserving medium, storage devices, a video interface, and input/output interface ports. The machine may be controlled, at least in part, by input from conventional input devices, such as keyboards, mice, etc., as well as by directives received from another machine, interaction with a virtual reality (VR) environment, biometric feedback, or other input signal. As used herein, the term “machine” is intended to broadly encompass a single machine, or a system of communicatively coupled machines or devices operating together. Exemplary machines include computing devices such as personal computers, workstations, servers, portable computers, handheld devices, telephones, tablets, etc., as well as transportation devices, such as private or public transportation, e.g., automobiles, trains, cabs, etc.
The machine may include embedded controllers, such as programmable or non-programmable logic devices or arrays, Application Specific Integrated Circuits, embedded computers, smart cards, and the like. The machine may utilize one or more connections to one or more remote machines, such as through a network interface, modem, or other communicative coupling. Machines may be interconnected by way of a physical and/or logical network, such as an intranet, the Internet, local area networks, wide area networks, etc. One skilled in the art will appreciated that network communication may utilize various wired and/or wireless short range or long range carriers and protocols, including radio frequency (RF), satellite, microwave, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 810.11, Bluetooth, optical, infrared, cable, laser, etc.
The invention may be described by reference to or in conjunction with associated data including functions, procedures, data structures, application programs, etc. which when accessed by a machine results in the machine performing tasks or defining abstract data types or low-level hardware contexts. Associated data may be stored in, for example, the volatile and/or non-volatile memory, e.g., RAM, ROM, etc., or in other non-transitory storage devices and their associated storage media, including hard-drives, floppy-disks, optical storage, tapes, flash memory, memory sticks, digital video disks, biological storage, etc. Associated data may be delivered over transmission environments, including the physical and/or logical network, in the form of packets, serial data, parallel data, propagated signals, etc., and may be used in a compressed or encrypted format. Associated data may be used in a distributed environment, and stored locally and/or remotely for machine access.
Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention with reference to illustrated embodiments, it will be recognized that the illustrated embodiments may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. And, though the foregoing discussion has focused on particular embodiments, other configurations are contemplated. In particular, even though expressions such as “in one embodiment” or the like are used herein, these phrases are meant to generally reference embodiment possibilities, and are not intended to limit the invention to particular embodiment configurations. As used herein, these terms may reference the same or different embodiments that are combinable into other embodiments.
Consequently, in view of the wide variety of permutations to the embodiments described herein, this detailed description and accompanying material is intended to be illustrative only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. What is claimed as the invention, therefore, is all such modifications as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/501,953, titled “ENACTIVE PERCEPTION DEVICE”, filed Jun. 28, 2011, which is herein incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5128865 | Sadler | Jul 1992 | A |
5249967 | O'Leary et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5454722 | Holland et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5533181 | Bergsneider | Jul 1996 | A |
5781879 | Arnold et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797123 | Chou et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5857855 | Katayama | Jan 1999 | A |
5887120 | Wical | Mar 1999 | A |
5961333 | Harrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6126449 | Burns | Oct 2000 | A |
6138085 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173261 | Arai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6385620 | Kurzius et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6453315 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504990 | Abecassis | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523026 | Gillis | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6556964 | Haug et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6684202 | Humphrey et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7403890 | Roushar | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7487094 | Konig et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7539697 | Akella et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7555441 | Crow et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565403 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567895 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7607083 | Gong et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7644144 | Horvitz et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7711573 | Obeid | May 2010 | B1 |
7711672 | Au | May 2010 | B2 |
7720675 | Burstein et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7792685 | Andino, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813917 | Shuster | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7870203 | Judge et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7917587 | Zeng et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7966265 | Schalk et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8090725 | Cranfill | Jan 2012 | B1 |
20020059376 | Schwartz | May 2002 | A1 |
20020099730 | Brown et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106622 | Osborne et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030027121 | Grudnitski et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028564 | Sanfilippo | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030093322 | Sciuk | May 2003 | A1 |
20030167266 | Saldanha et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182310 | Charnock et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040030556 | Bennett | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040053203 | Walters et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040117234 | Lindsay-Scott et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050055209 | Epstein | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050165600 | Kasravi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192949 | Kojima | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197890 | Lu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202871 | Lippincott | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204337 | Diesel et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262428 | Little et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272517 | Funk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282141 | Falash et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060206332 | Paek et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230102 | Hidary | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235843 | Musgrove et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246973 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070061179 | Henderson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112710 | Drane et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135225 | Nieminen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070196798 | Pryor et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203991 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213126 | Deutsch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070259324 | Frank | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260421 | Berner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265089 | Robarts et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080052283 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120029 | Zelek et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080191864 | Wolfson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281620 | Schalk et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300930 | Compitello et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006164 | Kaiser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024554 | Murdock et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024747 | Moses et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090035736 | Wolpert et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090153350 | Steger et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090198488 | Vigen | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248399 | Au | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282104 | O'Sullivan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287672 | Chakrabarti et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292541 | Daya et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319508 | Yih et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023377 | Sheridan | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100098289 | Tognoli | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145678 | Csomai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179916 | Johns et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100228733 | Harrison et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100271298 | Vice et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100306251 | Snell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328051 | Hale et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040837 | Eden et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055098 | Stewart | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110184939 | Elliott | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208511 | Sikstrom et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Schwartz | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268300 | DeMers et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295759 | Selvakummar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002149675 | May 2002 | JP |
2004157931 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2012000013 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated May 5, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/419,324, filed May 19, 2006 entitled “System and Method for Authoring and Learning”. |
Van Rijk, R et al., Using CrisisKit and MOPED to Improve Emergency Management Team Training, Proceedings ISCRAM 2004, Brussels, May 3-4, 2004. pp. 161-166. |
Thomas, P.G. et al., AESOP—An Electronic Student Observatory Project, Frontiers in Education, 1998, 5 pages. |
Loftin, R.B. et al., Training the Hubble Space Telescope Flight Team, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1995, pp. 31-37. |
Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/419,317, filed May 19, 2006 entitled “Method for Interactive Training and Learning.” |
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/419,317, filed May 19, 2006 entitled “Method for Interactive Training and Learning.” |
Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2009 U.S. Appl. No. 11/419,317, filed May 19, 2006 entitled “Method for Interactive Training and Learning.” |
Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2009 U.S. Appl. No. 11/419,317, filed May 19, 2006 entitled “Method for Interactive Training and Learning.” |
Aiolli, Fabio; Sebastiani, Fabrizio; Sperduti, Alessandro, Preference Learning for Category-Ranking Based Interactive Text Cagegorization, Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, ICJNN 2007, Orlando, FL, Aug. 12-17, 2007, pp. 2034-2039. |
Mood Indicator Based on History of Electronic Communication Thread, IPCOM, Disclosure No. IPCOM000198194D, Jul. 29, 2010, 3 pages, retrieved from http://ip.com/IPCOM/000198194. |
Keh, Huan-Chao, The Chinese Text Categorization System with Category Priorities, Journal of Software, Oct. 2010, vol. 5, No. 10, pp. 1137-1143. |
R. Hawkins and M. Russell, Document Categorization Using Lexical Analysis and Fuzzy Sets, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jun. 1992, vol. 35, No. 1A, 1 pg. |
Lingway Vertical Search Solutions, Lingway HR Suite, “Lingway e-Recruitment Applications: a Semantic Solution for Recruitment”, retrieved from http://www.lingway.com/images/pdf/fichelhrslea07anglaisweb.pdf on Jun. 17, 2012 (2 pages). |
Tseng, “Semantic Classification of Chinese unknown words”, ACL '03 Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics—vol. 2 Association for Computational Linguistics Stroudsburg, PA, USA © 2003. |
Mohammad, “Measuring Semantic Distance Using Distributional Profiles of Concepts”, a thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Graduate Department of Computer Science University of Toronto, 2008, pp. 1-167. |
Mohammad, et al., “Measuring Semantic Distance Using Distributional Profiles of Concepts”, Association for Computational Linguistics; retrieved at http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/˜saif/WebDocs/Measuring-Semantic-Distance.pdf, 2006, pp. 1-34. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61501953 | Jun 2011 | US |