The present invention relates to organic LED (OLED) devices. More particularly, the invention relates to packaging of OLED devices.
To protect the OLED cells from the environment such as moisture and/or air, a cap 160 encapsulates the device. The active and electrode materials of the OLED cells are sensitive and can be easily damaged due to mechanical contact with, for example, the cap. To prevent damage to the OLED cells, a cavity cap or package is used. The cavity package provides a cavity 145 between the cap and OLED cells. The cavity also allows for the placement of desiccant materials to cope with finite leakage rate of the device.
Typically, the lateral dimensions of OLED devices are usually in the range of a few centimeters or more, depending on the applications. To accommodate the large lateral dimensions, thicker caps are used to provide the necessary mechanical stability to maintain the integrity of the cavity.
However, the demand for thin and flexible devices requires the use of thinner components, such as the cap and the substrate. Decreasing the thickness of the cap reduces its mechanical stability, making it more prone to bending which can cause the cavity to collapse, thereby damaging the OLED cells.
As evidenced from the above discussion, it is desirable to provide an OLED device having improved packaging, particularly those formed on thin or flexible substrates.
The invention relates to encapsulation for devices such as OLED devices. One or more OLED cells are provided in the device region of the substrate. A cap is mounted on the substrate to encapsulate the device. The cap forms a cavity in the device region, separating it from the OLED cells.
In accordance with the invention, spacer particles are provided in the device region to prevent the cap from contacting the OLED cells. In one embodiment, the spacer particles are randomly deposited on the substrate by spraying techniques. In one embodiment, the spacer particles are deposited by a dry spray technique. Alternatively, a wet spray technique is employed to deposit the spacer particles on the substrate. In one embodiment, the spacer particles are coated with an adhesive that can be cured after deposition of the spacer particles. Spacer particles in the non-device region are removed, leaving the spacer particles randomly distributed in the device region. A cap is mounted on the substrate to encapsulate the device. The spacer particles in the device region prevent the cap from contacting the OLED cells.
The invention relates generally to OLED devices. In particular, the invention provides a cost-effective package for encapsulating OLED devices, particularly those formed on flexible or thin substrates. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, spacer particles are provided between the OLED cells and the cap. The spacer particles prevent the cap from contacting the OLED cells.
In one embodiment, the substrate comprises a flexible material, such as a plastic film for forming a flexible device. Various commercially available plastic films can be used to serve as the substrate. Such films, for example, include transparent poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(enthylene naphthalate) (PEN), polycarbonate (PC), polyamides (PI), polysulfones (PSO), and poly(p-phenylene ether sulfone) (PES). Other materials such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methyleacrylate) (PMMA), can also be used to form the substrate. A flexible substrate comprising thin glass or other flexible materials is also useful.
In one embodiment, the substrate is about 20-300 um thick. In some cases, the thin substrate may be mechanically unstable, creating processing problems. A temporary support layer (not shown) can be employed to stabilize the substrate during the fabrication process. The temporary support layer, for example, can be provided on the backside of the substrate. In one embodiment, the temporary support layer comprises a polymer foil coated with an adhesive for attaching to the substrate. After processing, the temporary layer is removed since the device package can be used to mechanically stabilize the device.
A conductive layer 205 is deposited on the substrate. The substrate can be provided with a barrier layer, such as silicon dioxide (SiO2), beneath the conductive layer on the substrate surface prior to depositing the conductive. Barrier layers are particularly useful for substrates comprising soda lime glass. The barrier layer, for example, is about 20 nm thick. In one embodiment, the conductive layer comprises a transparent conductive material, such as indium-tin-oxide (ITO). Other types of transparent conductive layers, including zinc-oxide and indium-zinc-oxide, are also useful. Various techniques, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) physical vapor deposition (PVD), and plasma enhanced CVD (PECVD), can be employed to form the device layer. The conductive layer should be thin to reduce optical absorption and negative impact on subsequent film formation while satisfying electrical requirements. The conductive layer is typically about 0.02-1 μm thick.
Referring to
One or more organic functional layers 310 are formed on the substrate, covering the exposed substrate portions and conductive layer. The functional organic layers comprise, for example, conjugated polymer or low molecular materials such as Alq3. Other types of functional organic layers are also useful. The organic functional layers can be formed by conventional techniques, for example, wet processes such as spin coating or vacuum sublimation (for Alq3 organic layers). The thickness of the organic layers is typically about 2-200 nm.
Referring to
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, spacer particles 480 are deposited on the substrate. In one embodiment, the spacer particles comprise a spherical shape. Spacer particles having other geometric shapes, such as cubical, prism, pyramidal, or other regular or irregular shapes are also useful. The average mean diameter of the spacer particles is sufficient to maintain the desired height of the cavity, which for example is about 2-50 μm. The size and shape distribution of the spacer particles should be sufficiently narrow to ensure proper separation between the cap and OLED cells.
The spacer particles are preferably fixed to one side of the substrate to avoid any movement. In one embodiment, the spacer particles are coated with a thin layer of adhesive before deposition. The adhesive layer comprises, for example, epoxy resin or acrylic resin. In one embodiment, the adhesive is cured by heat treatment. In another embodiment, the adhesive is cured by exposure to ultraviolet radiation. In yet another embodiment, the adhesive comprises a hot melt material.
In one embodiment, the spacer particles are randomly distributed on the substrate. The spacer particles occupy both active and non-active parts (i.e., emitting and non-emitting areas) of the device. In another embodiment, the spacer particles are confined to the non-active areas. Various techniques such as photolithography technology can be employed to pattern the coverage of the spacer particles. Alternatively, shadow mask or stencil mask technology can be used. A shadow mask with the required pattern is placed in close proximity or direct contact with the surface before deposition of the spacer particles. During the spray application process, only the regions which are exposed by the mask will be covered with spacer particles. Alternatively, a patterned dry resist film can be laminated on the bare surface. After the spacer particles are deposited, the dry resist film is cured and removed from the surface, leaving the exposed areas covered with spacer particles. A liquid resist material can also be used in a similar manner.
The distribution or density of the spacer particles should be sufficient to prevent the cap from contacting the OLED cells in the presence of mechanical stress, whether by designed (flexible devices) or accident (handling of the devices). The distribution can be varied to accommodate design requirements, such as the thickness of the cap, thickness of the substrate, and amount of device flexibility needed.
In a preferred embodiment, the spacer distribution is sufficient to maintain the height of the cavity without visibly effecting the emission uniformity of the OLED cells. Typically, a spacer distribution having an average distance between spacer particles of about 10-500 μm is adequate in preventing the cap from contacting the OLED cells. In one embodiment, the density of the spacer particle distribution is about 10-1000 No/mm2. Such a distribution along with the small size of the spacer particles ensures that their influence on emission uniformity is essentially invisible to the unaided human eye.
To avoid causing shorts between the electrodes, the spacer particles preferably comprise a non-conductive material. In one embodiment, the spacer particles are made of glass. Spacer particles made of other types of non-conductive materials, such as silica, polymers, or ceramic, are also useful.
In one embodiment, the spacer particles are deposited by spraying techniques. In a preferred embodiment, a dry spray technique is employed to deposit the spacer particles. Dry spray techniques are described in, for example, Birenda Bahadur (Ed), Liquid Crystals: Applications and Uses, Vol. 1 (ISBN 9810201109), which is incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Dry spray techniques typically comprise electrostatically charging the spacer particles with a first polarity (positive or negative) and the substrate with a second polarity (negative or positive). The spacer particles are blown against the substrate with dry air supplied by a dry air sprayer. Dry air sprayers, such as a DISPA-μR from Nisshin Engineering Co., can be used. Electrostatic attraction causes the spacer particles to adhere to the substrate while electrostatic repulsion between the particles prevents particle agglomeration on the substrate. A particle density of 160-180 No/mm2 can be achieved using a dry air sprayer which generates dry air, for example, having a dew point ≦−58° C. at pressure of 2 kg/cm2 and a current of 50l/min for 10 s spray duration. By varying the spraying parameters, other particle densities can be achieved.
The use of a wet spray technique to deposit the spacer particles on the substrate is also useful. Wet spray techniques are described in, for example, Birenda Bahadur (Ed), Liquid Crystals: Applications and Uses, Vol. 1 (ISBN 9810201109), which is already incorporated by reference for all purposes. Typically, the spacer particles are suspended in an alcoholic or aqueous liquids, such as ethanol, isopropanol, or a mixture comprising alcohol and water. The spacer concentration, for example, is about 0.1-0.5% by weight. Ultrasonic waves can be used to disperse the particles to prevent agglomeration. For example, the spacer particles can be irradiated with ultrasonic waves for several minutes prior to particle deposition. The prepared suspension is sprayed with air through a nozzle onto the substrate, depositing the spacer particles thereon.
Referring to
Referring to
The cap layer 660 comprises, for example, metal or glass. Other types of caps which protect the active components from the environment, such as ceramic or metallized foil, are also useful. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the cap can be stamped or etched, depending on the material used, to form a cavity separating the cap and the OLED devices.
Various techniques can be used to mount the cap layer. In one embodiment, an adhesive is used to mount the cap layer. Adhesives such as self-hardening adhesives, UV or thermal curable adhesives, or hot melt adhesives are useful. Other techniques which employ low temperature solder materials, ultrasonic bonding, or welding techniques using inductance or laser welding are also useful.
In one embodiment of the invention, a sealing dam surrounding the device region of the substrate is provided. The sealing dam supports the cap on the substrate and provides a sealing region located at an outer face of the sealing dam. The use of a sealing dam is described in international patent application “Sealing of Electronic Devices”, PCT/SG00/00133, which is herein incorporated by reference for all purposes.
During the mounting process, the spacer particles may be pressed into the layers of the OLED cells. The spacer particles provide support for the cap over the area of the OLED cells, preventing the cap from contacting the active components of the device when pressure is applied to the cap. Bond pads 650 are formed to provide electrical access to the OLED cells.
As described, the process deposits the adhesive-coated spacer particles after formation of the organic layers. The spacer particles can alternatively be deposited at other points in the process flow. For example, the spacer particles can be deposited before the formation of the first conductive layer, before the formation of the organic layers, or after the formation of the second conductive layer. In effect, the spacer particles can be deposited at any point of the process prior to mounting of the cap.
The adhesive on the spacer particles is cured at some point in the process flow after the deposition of the spacer particles. In one embodiment, the adhesive is cured after the spacer particles are deposited on the substrate and before the formation of the organic layers. In another embodiment, the adhesive is cured after the spacer particles are applied to the first active organic layer and before the formation of the remaining layers. In another embodiment, the adhesive is cured after the spacer particles are applied to the second organic layer and before the formation of the remaining layers. In yet another embodiment, the adhesive is cured after the spacer particles are applied to the second conductive layer and before the encapsulation of the OLED device. Spacer particles can also be useful in providing support in other types of devices that employ cavity packages. Such devices include, for example, electrical devices, mechanical devices, electromechanical devices, or microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to various embodiments, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that modifications and changes may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. The scope of the invention should therefore be determined not with reference to the above description but with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of international patent application titled “Encapsulation of Organic LED Devices”, PCT Patent Application No. PCT/SG99/00143, filed Dec. 17, 1999.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4253741 | Nakauchi et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4640584 | Tsubakimoto et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4811081 | Lyden | Mar 1989 | A |
4842946 | Foust et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4961962 | Morimoto | Oct 1990 | A |
5041395 | Steffen | Aug 1991 | A |
5188280 | Nakao et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5385499 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5399805 | Tyler et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5467253 | Heckman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5486941 | Saiuchi et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5550408 | Kunitomo et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552913 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577319 | Knecht | Nov 1996 | A |
5580619 | Sakai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5610742 | Hinata et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5632663 | Ishihara et al. | May 1997 | A |
5687465 | Hinata et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693956 | Shi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5714838 | Haight et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724230 | Poetzinger | Mar 1998 | A |
5750258 | Sakai et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777386 | Higashi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5804917 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811177 | Shi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821692 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844315 | Melton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5900675 | Appelt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909081 | Eida et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920080 | Jones | Jul 1999 | A |
5939783 | Laine et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949184 | Ohoshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964030 | Lee et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5965907 | Huang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6022583 | Falcone et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6111355 | Inoue et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111356 | Roitman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111357 | Fleming et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124918 | Park et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6156669 | Knappenberger | Dec 2000 | A |
6166489 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172879 | Cilia et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177729 | Benenati et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184959 | Izumi | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198220 | Jones et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210815 | Ooishi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219126 | Von Gutfeld | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222603 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232667 | Hultmark et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6259204 | Ebisawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260264 | Chen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284342 | Ebisawa et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309502 | Hiroshige et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313528 | Solberg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339254 | Venkateshwaran et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6364196 | Wood et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376917 | Takeshita et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6399004 | Slager | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6569706 | Pakbaz et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6580090 | Barth et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6621173 | Yamakawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633124 | Himeshima et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6649221 | Tateno et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650392 | Iwanaga et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6734942 | Takeuchi | May 2004 | B2 |
6791660 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6888237 | Guenther | May 2005 | B1 |
6888308 | Guenther | May 2005 | B1 |
6949880 | Guenther et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952078 | Guenther | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7166007 | Auch et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20020125484 | Silvernail et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030062518 | Auch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030094691 | Auch et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040217703 | Wittmann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3716856 | Dec 1988 | DE |
0 884 792 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 910 228 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0986112 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1021070 | Jul 2000 | EP |
58160927 | Sep 1983 | JP |
60-122919 | Jul 1985 | JP |
3-171643 | Jul 1991 | JP |
04090512 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04136916 | May 1992 | JP |
09097679 | Apr 1997 | JP |
11176571 | Jul 1999 | JP |
WO 9828767 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9828947 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9859528 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 0016361 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0016362 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0069002 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0104938 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0104963 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0139174 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0144865 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0144866 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0145140 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0221557 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 03030272 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030094691 A1 | May 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/SG99/00143 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09989362 | US |