Patent Grant
10138045
The present invention generally relates to protective covers and cases for articles. More particularly, the present invention discloses protective covers for smaller hand held articles, namely guns, collector's items, and the like that are planar in nature.
Up until now there have been relatively moderate efforts in designing and manufacturing a fully engineered protective cover for handheld planar type articles, a number of the current protective covers available for hand held articles to the consumer appear to be design afterthoughts in that they are nothing any more special than a foam padded pocket being similar to a laptop bag in basic construction. The typical protective cover has a zippered enclosure with a soft foam padded lining with a nylon type fabric cover, wherein the protective cover very loosely fits around the article. The current other protective cover materials available are typically various forms of corrugated cardboard, bubble wrap, or sheet foam padding that at the very best only moderately protect the article, this being primarily due to the packaging and protective cover materials being inherently soft and flexible and also fitting around the outer surface of the article in a very loose manner, due to the protective cover attempting to fit a wide variety of article sizes.
What this results in that if another piece of cargo or transport vehicle wall becomes adjacent to the article during shipping or transport and comes in contact with the currently available protective cover, the cover firstly will not have any structural rigidity to resist any sort of point impact to protect the article, and secondly with the relative movement being allowed to the article within the cover during the normal shipping inertia loads, the article will tend to bang around especially on its outer periphery against the inside of the protective cover allowing further damage to the outer periphery of the article and again causing potential damage to the surface finish of the article, this is especially critical in that this shifting of the article within the protective cover during transit is highly cyclical, (due to vehicle motion) i.e. occurring numerous times (in the thousands), thus the aforementioned damage can become highly cumulative in nature.
Therefore, two very basic desirable things come to light to maximize the shipping and transport protection given to the article. The first desirable thing is “structural rigidity”, in other words the protective cover should be able to handle a point load impact and be able to handle a bending load imposed upon the article along its longest axis from end to end. Wherein the aforementioned point load impact and bending load are placed upon the exterior of the protective cover, the protective cover would have the rigidity to absorb the brunt of this external loading by being its own rigid structure, thus not transmitting these external protective cover loads to the article itself. The second desirable thing for the protective cover is to have a very snug and close-fitting fit to the exterior surface of the article, that absolutely minimizes the relative movement of the article within the protective cover during transport or shipment. As this snug fitting concept will go a long way toward preventing the previously described high-frequency occurrence and cumulative damage to either the exterior surface finish of the article or damage to the exterior surfaces being principally upon the outer periphery of the article.
The well-known problem to accomplishing the above two mentioned things for a protective cover typically requires a totally custom made hard shell enclosure that has an interior that is also custom fit and cut to the external surface of the article, as is typically used in specialized cases made for high value electronic equipment that is frequently shipped or transported frequently. To address one of these two things, the prior art in differing art areas has used air pressure to create temporary rigidity in structures, wherein as long as the air negative or positive pressure remains in place the normally flexible structure is rigid, with the structure becoming flexible once again when the air negative or positive pressure returns to atmospheric pressure. To address the close fitting requirement, the prior art has had solutions that are permanent, such as expandable polyurethane foam, that can certainly precisely encase an article's unique external shape for shipping without any relative movement of the article in the foam casing, however, the foam casing being permanent in shape and not reusable or very durable, thus being acceptable for one time shipping from factory to user, however, not being acceptable for multiple transport scenarios, where the article is transported multiple times to its site of usage or where a different article is used that is a slightly different size.
Starting in the prior art for an air rigid type apparatus with United States Patent Application Number 20080289640 to Kline, disclosed is a vacuum activated device for holding a human immobile. The device in Kline includes a rigid frame of a three dimensional shape large enough to surround a human torso and a bag comprised of a flexible, air impermeable material enclosing the frame with a closure on the bag being necessary to allow an occupant to enter or be placed within it. In Kline, when air is evacuated through a hole in the bag its surface will collapse around the frame and the occupant's body with the rigidity of the frame in combination with the pressure applied to the occupant by the surface of the bag will impede further movement by the occupant wherein a means to allow the occupant access to breathable air will is provided.
Continuing in the prior art for an air rigid apparatus in U.S. Pat. No. 7,273,462 (2007) to Rugfelt, et al. disclosed is an apparatus for supporting and stabilizing an injured person or an injured limb, with a flexible film element enclosing an airtight inner region that can be evacuated. The film element in Rugfelt is provided with two insertion bodies which respectively are formed with two air-permeable, flexible material strips and each insertion body is divided into chambers containing loose particles, by way of intersecting seams formed between the material strips. The seams in Rugfelt on both insertion bodies are staggered in relation to each other in both directions in such a way that the particles combine to form a substantially homogenously thick particle layer. Further, Rugfelt teaches a device for stabilizing an injured body part with a flexible film element enclosing an airtight region that can be evacuated, wherein the film element has two air permeable flexible material strips forming an insertion body that is divided into chambers containing loose particles, with the seams of the material strips are staggered to one another in both directions, such that the particles form a homogeneously thick particle layer, see
As Rugfelt's goal is to support and stabilize an injured body part, see column 2, lines 5 to 19, the point of the evacuated chamber to solely “stiffen” the film element, i.e. to stabilize the injured body part, wherein constant stiffness in all directions is important, which in having cross pieces or long thin chambers within the film element causes buckling zones as between chambers is taught as being undesirable, further the long thin chambers require manual redistribution of the particle for evening-out the particle distribution within each chamber. Another issue important to Rugfelt's application is the elimination of shrinkage of the film element during evacuation, see column 2, lines 20 to 31, as shrinkage in the film element of any form while evacuating the film element as against an injured body part is very undesirable as having potential for causing added injury due to compression movement in any direction of the film element as against the injured body part.
Ideally, Rugfelt's goals during film element evacuation, are to have the film element simply becoming rigid evenly in all directions with minimal or no shrinkage, thus simply holding the injured body part in place for transport without applying any added loading to the injured body part either through uneven (longitudinal versus lateral) stiffness or loading of the film element from evacuation or having any shrinkage, i.e. film element movement as against the injured body part during evacuation, see column 2, lines 35 to 42. Rugfelt teaches the structure to accomplish the above mentioned goals is somewhat similar to Korfmacher in the formation of a mat type structure, however, Rugfelt adding a matrix grid type structure for the interior chambering seaming resulting in small volume wise chambers thus absolutely avoiding a continuous chamber in any direction from the seams intersecting at right angles, see column 2, lines 43 to column 3, line 34.
Looking in particular at
Further in the prior art in this same area of air pressure rigid structures in U.S. Pat. No. 3,745,998 (1973) to Rose, disclosed is an emergency immobilization and extrication device similar to Rugfelt except that the longitudinal chambers are used for the particulate filler to enhance lengthwise rigidity for the limb, further a system of foraminous distribution between chambers for vacuuming is disclosed along with soft and irregular particulate matter being claimed as forming a more rigid structure when subjected to a vacuum pressure. Next in the prior art again for solidifying flexible structures via air is in U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,185 (1992) to Latimer that discloses an emergency immobilization device that allows the particulate materials to be manually shifted to provided additional stiffening in selected areas of the support. Further, in the prior art for air rigidity structures in U.S. Pat. No. 4,657,003 (1987) to Wirtz disclosed is an emergency immobilization device similar to Latimer in function, wherein the particulate materials are to be manually shifted to provide additional stiffening in selected areas of the support, with a different interior chamber system.
Also in the prior art for air rigid based structures, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,826,583 (1998) to Wood disclosed is an emergency immobilization and extrication device that permits a victim of spinal column trauma to be firmly supported and immobilized for transportation. The device in Wood comprises a container filled with a multiplicity of small, resilient particles resting in a light-weight rigid base-board, and having a sliding rigid cover. The container in Wood comprises means for inflating with gas and deflating, see abstract. Wood claims “flexible sub-containers in the shape of a human body” within the device, where each sub-container is filled with a plurality of deformable and resilient particles, having container perforations sufficiently small so that the gas but not the particles may travel freely from one sub-container to another, see column 6, lines 2-7.
Next, in the prior art for air rigid devices, in United States Patent Application Publication Number 20040082891 to Daugherty, et al. disclosed a vacuum splint device for securely immobilizing an injured limb or other body part. The device in Daugherty et al., includes a plurality of T-shaped straps for insertion through slots on the sleeve of the device. Each strap in Daugherty et al., may be folded over the slots and back upon itself to fasten the end of the strap to the device. The sleeve of the Daugherty et al., device includes a plurality of particles that are initially separated by air to allow for the device to be flexible. Once placed on the injured body part, the air may be removed from the Daugherty et al., device using an intake/exhaust valve tube assembly to compress the particles together to form a substantially rigid sleeve. A filter in Daugherty et al., is on the valve tube assembly to ensure that the particles remain within the sleeve.
Once the air is removed from the Daugherty et al., device, a clamp may be used on the tube of the valve tube assembly to prevent any air from flowing into the tube. Upon removal of the Daugherty et al., device from the injured limb, the straps may be removed from the device for replacement or washing. Air may be introduced into the sleeve by undoing the clamp so as to allow air to reenter the interior in the Daugherty et al., device and separate the particles and allow the device to be folded.
Also in the prior art area for what is termed “vacuum splints” in U.S. Design Pat. No. D261,430 (1981) to Baturin disclosed is the ornamental design for a vacuum splint having a mattress shape where the particles inside the split are divided into circumferential chambers, and two primary chambers exist along the length of the mattress, and several additional chambers exist along the width of the mattress, see
Next looking in the prior art at sportboard specific protective covers in United States Patent Application Publication Number 20070125671 to Stephens, disclosed is an industry standard packaging design to ship and protect surfboards, wakeboards, snowboards, kiteboards, etc. in various sizes. Stephens uses corrugated die-cut end caps, flexible straps, and foam and corrugated pads to provide enhanced fragility protection in an easy to assemble/disassemble and reusable package. This package in Stephens makes it possible to ship expensive board products around the world safely and cost effectively for OEM Bulk and retail single/bulk deliveries, see abstract, however, not really being designed to be reusable for multiple transportation use scenarios.
Continuing in this prior art area for sportboard specific protective covers in United States Patent Application Publication Number 20100006469 to Allouche disclosed is a surfboard case that includes a body which has an interior that is structured to stretchably adapt to a surfboard having a predetermined shape and size. The body in Allouche is further structured to substantially cushion an impact to the surfboard contained within the surfboard case. In at least one instance in Allouche, a substantial portion of the surfboard case comprises a neoprene material of construction. The surfboard case in Allouche also includes at least one reinforcement section disposed in protective relation to a predetermined portion of the surfboard, see abstract.
Further, in this prior art area for sportboard specific protective covers in U.S. Pat. No. 4,483,380 (1984) to Beran disclosed is a foldable protective cover and carrier for sports equipment. The cover in Beran includes an outer layer of protective material such as nylon and an inner layer of cushioning material such as foam plastic. A pocket in Beran is provided at each longitudinal end of the cover at the inner side, and four laterally extending straps are spaced along the outer layer of material with two straps being at the longitudinal ends and the other two inwardly thereof. Reinforcing strips in Beran extend laterally across the longitudinal ends of the cover and a third reinforcing strip having a fifth strap connected therewith extends between the inwardly positioned straps to form a handle at one side edge when the cover is fully assembled. Sports equipment, such as a surfboard, is placed on the inner side of the unfolded cover in Beran, preferably with the bottom facing upwardly, and the cover is folded over a surfboard in an overlapping fashion to provide a dual layer of protection for the bottom of the board The pair of inwardly positioned straps in Beran are the fastened about the board, after which the ends of the cover are folded around the board ends in such a manner that the dual layer of protection wraps continuously around the nose and tail of the board, after which the end straps are fastened.
Continuing in this prior art area of sportboard protective covers in U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,235 (1992) to Bamburak, et al., disclosed a protective cover for a surfboard or the like that has a cushioned end with protective pockets to enclose the fin(s), and also can cover an end of the surfboard. The fin-receiving pockets in Bamburak, et al., are formed between air-filled plenums or bodies of shock-absorbing material such as foam. A closure strap in Bamburak, et al., can encircle the surfboard for holding the protective cover in place, or a zipper closure can be provided, see abstract. Next, in the sportboard cover protective arts in U.S. Pat. No. 7,017,747 (2006) B2 to Kiger, et al. disclosed is a protective surfboard covering device including a cover that defines a plurality of inflatable cushions that may include a top surface cushion, a bottom surface cushion, and a pair of laterally spaced apart sidewall cushions, the cushions defining therebetween a surfboard compartment and cooperating to form a mouth through which the surfboard is inserted into the surfboard compartment, see abstract. Note, that in Kiger et al., using positive air pressure for rigidity is generally not as preferable as using negative air pressure with particulate matter, due to the situation when the air pressure is lost then for the positive pressure device as in Kiger et al., all cushioning and rigidity is lost, wherein with the negative pressure device such as a vacuum splint in Rose, wherein loss of air pressure will still result in some cushioning and rigidity of the device remaining.
Moving ahead in the sportboard protective cover arts, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,193,677 (1993) to Moreno disclosed a surfboard storage and carrying bag with a pneumatically inflated guard rail comprising of three circumferential tubes with each pneumatically inflated and attached inside a surfboard storage or carrying bag that when inflated provides a guard rail or bumper to protect the surfboard. Moreno also describes an inflatable pillow that protects fin protrusions, see abstract. Moreno would have the same problems as Kiger et al., is using a positive air pressure to add rigidity and cushioning to the protective cover. Next, in the sportboard protective cover arts, U.S. Pat. No. 5,094,344 (1992) to Savage disclosed is a surfboard carry case that includes a soft portion and a rigid hard portion, structured such that at least one surfboard can be carried therein, with a tail portion of the surfboard, including the fins, protectively encapsulated within the hard case portion.
Continuing, in the sportboard protective cover arts in U.S. Pat. No. 5,163,550 (1992) to Hawk disclosed is a protective cover for snowboards comprising an elastic elongated panel having an elastic cord around its outer peripheral edge which must be stretched in order to permit insertion of the snowboard such that the bottom of the snowboard is covered by the panel and the elastic cord snugly engages the top surface of the panel; and reinforcing layers are provided along the surrounding edge of the panel to overlap the edges of the snowboard. Noting, that Hawk recognizes the importance of protecting the outer periphery of the sportboard from damage.
Continuing, in the sportboard protective cover arts in U.S. Pat. No. 8,387,789 (2013) to Baker, disclosed is an encasement protective apparatus for an article preferably in the form of a surfboard, the protective apparatus is evacuated thus compressing soft particles together to stiffen the apparatus for protecting the article during shipment. The protective apparatus in Baker is constructed of a fluid tight sealed cover that has disposed within intersticed first and second chambers that each have the soft particles disposed within, wherein the cover is wrapped about the article and the first and second chambers are evacuated to cause the cover to stiffen about the article for protecting the article.
Next, in the vacuum actuated packing nest arts in U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,830 to Bender et el., disclosed in a sealed bag that is air tight that is partially filled with a plurality of spherical foam pieces that are about 1/16 to ⅛ inch in diameter, wherein an article such as a camera is inserted into the bag, wherein the loose non evacuated bag forms about the article, with a manual vacuum pump evacuates the bag, thus causing the foam pieces to become tightly packed into one another forming a rigid enclosure about the article. However, in Bender, the article is directly exposed to the foam pieces which could result in foam pieces becoming trapped within cracks and crevices in the article being generally undesirable.
Moving onward, also in the vacuum actuated packing nest arts in U.S. Pat. No. 5,595,806 to Korfmacher disclosed is a mat for bearing and supporting an article for packaging, wherein the mat is airtight envelope having a valve and a partial fill of granular material that is lodged within an air permeable fabric sack with spacing controlled by spacer threads causing the fabric to have parallel panels. However, in Korfmacher the granular material is free to move within the entire parallel gap formed by the spacer threads and the fabric, which can have the undesirable effect of allowing the granular material to bunch up in a particular corner on the airtight envelope, thus causing an uneven padding effect from the granular material, especially when the granular material is vacuumed out and becomes rigid.
Continuing now in the medical table arts, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,207 to Moenning et al., disclosed is a medical table assembly having a plurality of parallel tubes that are adjacent to one another running lengthwise within the table, each tube is a separate air tight assembly with an inner tube that runs parallel with the granular material in-between the tubes, wherein the air is evacuated out through the inner tube. In Moenning, the purpose of the evacuation of the bed portion of the medical table is to rigidify the bed and tighten the patient restraints, obviously not encasing the patient.
Further, in the prior art wherein the article is in the form of a firearm in U.S. Pat. No. 6,253,915 to Mesica, et al. disclosed a protective pouch for firearms that includes a compartment defined by front and rear faces and a peripheral face between the front and rear faces. A zipper opening mechanism in Mesica provides access to the inside of the pouch and the pouch is constructed of a fabric-like material having bulletproof characteristics. The pouch in Mesica includes a mechanism for securing a firearm within the pouch, plus a lock may also be included to restrict access to the contents of the pouch.
Continuing, in the prior art wherein the article is in the form of a firearm in U.S. Pat. No. 4,463,847 to Gordon disclosed is a rust-preventive firearm receptacle comprising a water-vapor-impervious material cover defining a cavity, a vapor-phase anti-rust inhibitor insert with active vapor-phase anti-rust inhibitor, a soft interior, including a pocket attached to the interior for replaceably receiving the insert, and a tape device mounted about the perimeter of the receptacle to seal the interior cavity thereof from outside air. The invention in Gordon is generally used by placing a chemical carrier insert into the cavity pocket such that when the firearm is carried within the sealed cavity of the receptacle, it is surrounded by the vapor-phase inhibitor emanating out of the insert and when inactive, the insert can be replaced.
Next, in the prior art also wherein the article is in the form of a firearm in U.S. Pat. No. 7,451,872 to Allen, disclosed is a weaponry container comprising: a plurality of elongated walls movably coupled to one another, each one of the walls having: (a) a length extending along a longitudinal axis, (b) a width extending along a lateral axis, the lateral axis intersecting with the longitudinal axis, (c) a perimeter, (d) an outer surface, at least part of the outer surface having a rigid characteristic, and (e) an inner surface, the elongated walls defining an inner space when the weaponry container is closed. Wherein in Allen, the inner space being configured to receive a first elongated weapon and a second elongated weapon; at least one fastener coupled to at least one of the elongated walls; a first weaponry holder coupled to the inner surface of a first one of the elongated walls, the first weaponry holder being flexible, the first weaponry holder having a plurality of sections, the sections being spaced apart from each other along an axis parallel to the lateral axis, each one of the sections extending from the inner surface, each one of the sections having a section end.
Further, in Allen at least one of the section ends having a first fastener configured to removably attach the section ends to each other, the sections defining a first holding space when the section ends are attached to each other, the first holding space having a size, the first fastener enabling adjustment of the size so that, when an end of the first elongated weapon is inserted into the first holding space: (a) said sections restrain a lateral movement of said end along the first axis; and (b) the first weaponry holder secures said end to the first elongated wall; a second weaponry holder coupled to the inner surface of the first elongated wall, the second weaponry holder being flexible, the second weaponry holder having a plurality of sections, the sections being spaced apart from each other along the axis parallel to the lateral axis.
Also in Allen, each one of the sections extending from the inner surface, each one of the sections having a section end, at least one of the section ends having a second fastener configured to removably attach the section ends to each other, the sections defining a second holding space when the section ends are attached to each other, the second holding space having a size, the second fastener enabling adjustment of the size so that, when an end of the second elongated weapon end is inserted into the second holding space: (a) said sections restrain a lateral movement of said end along a second axis; and (b) the second weaponry holder secures said end to the first elongated wall; and a flexible extension coupled to at least one of the walls, part of the flexible extension extending adjacent to at least a portion of the perimeters of the walls when the weaponry container is closed.
Moving onward, in the prior art again wherein the article is in the form of a firearm in U.S. Pat. No. 7,063,737 to Tilby, et al., disclosed a soft case for holding weapons as they are transported or stored that has a clam-shell type body with an upper half body and a lower half body interconnected by a hinge. In Tilby, the upper and lower half bodies and hinge are made from a foam plastic that is soft enough to protect a weapon surrounded by the upper and lower half bodies and capable of being permanently shaped under heat and pressure to have one-half of a weapon molded as a recess in the upper half body and an opposite side one-half of the weapon molded as a recess in the lower half body. Whereby in Tilby when the upper and lower body halves are pivoted about the hinge and into a face to face relationship, with a weapon positioned in the recesses formed in the half bodies and including a zipper for securing the body halves together and a handle for carrying the gun case. Wherein the problem in Tilby is the permanent shaped that the upper and lower bodies take for a particular firearm, wherein there are numerous firearm shapes that need to be accommodated which makes the Tilby case inflexible in this respect for securely holding the firearm without relative movement during shipment.
Yet further, in the prior art further wherein the article is in the form of a firearm in U.S. Pat. No. 5,924,565 to Colee, disclosed is a gun case having a waterproof outer shell and an oil impregnated inside fabric liner, and conjoined sidelong and end access openings that allow the gun case to be quickly turned inside out and hung for cleaning and/or drying. Further in Colee secure fold-over hook and loop fastener closure flaps are provided for both openings to solidly retain the gun within the gun case and to prevent accidental opening and release of the gun. Padding is disposed between the patterned outer shell fabric and inner liner to cushion the gun as it is transported, and to maintain the buoyancy of the gun case so that it floats even with a gun contained therein. Thus in Colee, with just generic type padding the firearm only receives moderate protection, as the firearm by necessity has a loose cavity with which to move within the case that can result in damage to the firearm through movement within the case from handling.
What is needed is a protective cover that accomplishes is two very basic desirable things to maximize the shipping and transport protection given to the article. The first desirable thing is “structural rigidity”, in other words the protective cover must be able to handle an external point load impact and be able to handle an external bending load imposed upon the article along its longest axis from end to end. Wherein, the aforementioned point load impact and bending loads are placed upon the exterior of the protective cover, wherein the protective cover will absorb and stand up to the brunt of this external loading by being its own rigid structure, thus not transmitting these external protective cover loads directly to the article itself or at least shielding the majority of the external loading from the article. The second desirable thing for the protective cover is to have a very snug and close-fitting fit to the exterior surface of the article, even with varying outer shapes of the article, that minimizes the relative movement of the article in the protective cover during transport or shipment being due to a molded around the article type rigid encasement of the protective apparatus. As this snug fitting concept will go a long way toward preventing the previously described high-frequency occurrence and cumulative damage to either the exterior surface finish of the article or damage to the exterior surfaces being principally upon the outer periphery of the article emanating from the undesirable relative movement as between article outer surface and the cover interior lining.
Therefore the challenge of the present invention is to have a protective cover apparatus that can custom fit itself to a multitude of different size articles and to have the structural rigidity necessary to adequately protect the article, while at the same time having the ability to be used with a number of different sizes of articles and being desirably flexible for storage and handling when the protective cover apparatus of the present invention does not have an article disposed within it.
Broadly, the present invention is of an encasement protective apparatus for enveloping an article includes a flexible surrounding sidewall that is substantially fluid tight about a longitudinal axis, wherein the surrounding sidewall has a substantially fluid tight first end portion and an opposing substantially fluid tight second end portion, with the longitudinal axis spanning therebetween. The surrounding sidewall also having a substantially fluid tight first margin portion and an opposing substantially fluid tight second margin portion, wherein the first and second margin portions are substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis, the surrounding sidewall also having an outer surface portion that is adjacent to an external environment and an inner surface portion that defines a primary interior formed by the sidewall. Wherein, the first and second end portions, the first and second margins, and where the outer surface portion is attached at the first and second end portions thus, forms a pocket that the article is disposed within. With the first and second margin portions at the outer surface being removably engagable to one another and that define a first aperture opening, thereby the pocket defining a secondary interior, further a second aperture is disposed therethrough the sidewall allowing fluid communication from the primary interior into the external environment.
Also included in the encasement protective apparatus is a plurality of particulate items loosely disposed the primary interior. Wherein operationally, when the primary interior has a portion of the fluid evacuated therethrough out the second aperture, creating an absolute pressure within the primary interior that is less than the absolute pressure in the external environment causing the primary interior to be compressed resulting in the apparatus being in an evacuated state being defined as when the particulate items are substantially in compressive contact with one another and also substantially immovable relative to one another. This results in the surrounding sidewall becoming rigidified to provide a rigid shell to protect the article. Further, the particulate items are relatively movable and loose relative to one another being defined as an un-evacuated state when the primary interior is equalized in absolute pressure with the external environment when the primary interior is un-evacuated therethrough the second aperture thereby placing the apparatus into the un-evacuated state allowing the sidewall to be pliable, facilitating the article to be taken from the pocket or disposed within the pocket therethrough the first aperture.
These and other objects of the present invention will become more readily appreciated and understood from a consideration of the following detailed description of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention when taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which;
With initial reference to
Continuing,
Next,
Moving onward,
Next,
Continuing,
Moving ahead,
Next, in
Continuing,
Next,
Further,
Further,
Broadly, in referring to
Wherein, the outer surface portion 150 is attached 155 at the first 125 and second 130 end portions thus, forming the pocket 165 that the article 65 is disposed within, see
Also included in the encasement protective apparatus 50 is the plurality of particulate items 300 loosely disposed within the primary interior 160, wherein the particulate items 300 have a non-symmetrical outer surface 310, see
Note that in the evacuated state 360, shrinkage is a concern (from the un-evacuated state 380), especially as related to the secondary interior 170, this is especially acute in the injured/broken limb evacuation support arts, wherein any shrinkage is undesirable plus notable if the shrinkage is differentiated as between two perpendicular axes which could cause even further damage to the injured/broken limb. In the present invention, there is no non-symmetrical orientation of the particulate items 300 within the primary interior 160 to cause uneven evacuation state 360 shrinkage of the sidewall 115 to minimize any sliding of the inner surface 145 as against the article 65.
Further the particulate items 300 are relatively movable and loose relative to one another being defined as an un-evacuated state 380, see
Optionally in looking at
Further, as an option for the encasement protective apparatus 50 for an article 65, each of the compressible particulate items 300 can have a non-symmetrical outer surface 310 that is operational to substantially cause each compressible particulate item 300 to frictionally interlock with an adjacent compressible particulate item 300 in the evacuated state 360 to further add to the rigidified shell, see
Also, optionally, for the encasement protective apparatus 50 for the article 65, the second aperture 340 can further comprise a valve 345 disposed therein, wherein the valve 345 is selectively able to be placed in an open 355 or a closed state, wherein the open state 355 allows fluid flow 350 therethrough the second aperture 340 and the closed state substantially prevents fluid flow 350 therethrough the second aperture 340, see
In addition, an option for the encasement protective apparatus 50 for the article 65, can further comprise an auxiliary pocket 420 that is partially affixed 421 to the flexible surrounding sidewall 115 outer surface portion 150, as best shown in
In addition, an option for the encasement protective apparatus 50 for the article 65, can further comprise the fold out flap 435 that is partially affixed to the flexible surrounding sidewall 115 inner surface portion 145, as shown in
For the article 65 options would include; Guns 75, Tennis Rackets, Surfboards, Snowboards, Skis, Laptops, iPads/tablets, Kite/paddle-boards, Jewelry case, Bicycles, Guitars, Musical instruments, Scientific equipment, Sparring vest, Golfing, Cricket bats, Stand UP Paddle, Boards, Seat cushions-Automotive, Hockey Sticks, Fishing gear, Art Shipping, General shipping of goods, Ice Coolers, Wine bottle transport, Compound Hunting Bows, and the like.
Accordingly, the present invention of an encasement protective apparatus 50 has been described with some degree of particularity directed to the embodiments of the present invention. It should be appreciated, though; that the present invention is defined by the following claims construed in light of the prior art so modifications of the changes may be made to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention without departing from the inventive concepts contained therein.
This is a continuation in part (CIP) patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/990,640 filed on Jan. 7, 2016 by Roger James Baker of Aurora, Colo., US, that in turn claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/100,483 filed on Jan. 7, 2015 by Roger James Baker of Aurora, Colo., U.S.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7063737 | Tilby | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| D677049 | Pennington | Mar 2013 | S |
| 8387789 | Baker | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8662269 | Shor | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 9834361 | Baker | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 20100006469 | Allouche | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180065793 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62100483 | Jan 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14990640 | Jan 2016 | US |
| Child | 15796846 | US |
