The invention relates generally to power boats, specifically to the delivery of power from the engine of a power boat to a propeller, and back to the boat itself to effect forward or reverse motion in water. More specifically, my invention relates to a reliable and economical form of self-contained, enclosed drive shaft and associated components, suitable for installation on small boats.
The enclosed shaft system of the present invention provides in a unified structure, including a unique arrangement of bearings and an impeller-distributor to create continuous circulation of fluid lubricant among all bearing surfaces, wherein one or more journal bearings stabilize shaft movement and permit the flow of lubricant. The invention further includes appropriate seals to contain lubricant within the shaft enclosure and exclude seawater there from and an isolator designed to cooperate with the remaining components and to provide long life with stable characteristics.
A problem with current draft shaft propulsion systems is the protrusion of a rotating shaft through the hull of a marine vessel. The exposure of the shaft to the marine environment requires a large amount of maintenance in order to prevent marine growth from coating the shaft. Marine growth is one of the greatest deterrents to proper and efficient performance of a marine vessel. Marine growth is typically of the animal type, acorn barnacles and tubeworms being the most prevalent. The growth causes excessive turbulence along the shaft, thereby reducing the efficiency of the vessel and associated propeller. The rotation of the shaft further imparting turbulence onto the propeller resulting in vibrations that is difficult to eliminate. The cleaning of an exposed propeller shaft is difficult due to its shape and the need to perform most such cleaning while the vessel is in the water.
The present invention is directed to an enclosed, oil filled, self contained, shaft and thrust bearing assembly including an isolator mount which is the entry point of the shaft system into the hull of the vessel and transmits all of the thrust from the propeller to the vessel's hull structure.
As can be readily determined from Kutta-Joukowski theorem & calculation of The Magnus Effect, removing the rotational element from a marine shaft greatly reduces lift, drag and the horse power required to generate them. Enclosing the shaft in a stationary casing then can be calculated as straight forward drag based upon presented area of the appendage. This can be determined by viewing a standard NACA Foil or fin section which is the elliptical result of a cross section through a shaft at the angle of incidence (shaft angle) of the fluid stream. A chart of drag factors for standard NACA foil series is shown below:
The total drag on a fin or foil comes from two major components, induced drag (drag generated by lift) and profile drag (drag created by the shape and size of the foil). These two major drag components can be thought of as “active” and “passive” drag. Then, within “passive” or profile drag, there are two further components, drag due to the cross-section being presented to the incident flow, and wetted surface area drag due to the friction drag of the surface of the foil.
The passive drag components are present in both the enclosed as well as conventional exposed shaft systems. It is worthy of note however that the Magnus effect is more detrimental to the performance and power losses created by a spinning exposed shaft in a conventional system due to the presence of both “active”, “passive” and “vortex” drag, than can be calculated for a non-rotating enclosed system, which only exhibits “passive” drag elements.
For every action there exists an equal and opposite reaction, simply put, the generation of lift, friction, and drag requires an equal input of energy to overcome itself.
Similarly, each cutlass style bearing within the shaft system adds an additional 3% of lost energy, plus more losses associated with stuffing boxes and shaft seals averaging approximately 2%. Extrapolation of the formulae defining the Magnus effect in a series, shows an increase relative to left and velocity, therefore total shaft horse power losses can range from 6% to more than 10% after all the components are added together.
“Lift per unit length of a cylinder acts perpendicular to the velocity (V) and is given by:
L=pVG(Lbs/Ft)
Where:
Two early aerodynamicists determined the magnitude of the lift force, Kutta in Germany and Joukowski in Russia. The lift equation for a rotating cylinder bears their names. The equation states that the lift L per unit length along the cylinder is directly proportional to the velocity V of the flow, the density p of the flow, and the strength of the vortex G that is established by the rotation.
L=p*V*G
The equation gives lift-per-unit length because the flow is two-dimensional. (Obviously, the longer the cylinder, the great the lift) Determining the vortex strength G takes a little more math. The vortex strength equals the rotational speed V, times the circumference of the cylinder. If b is the radius of the cylinder.
G=2.0*b*pi*Vr
Where pi=3.14159. The rotational speed Vr is equal to the circumference of the culinder times the spin s of the cylinder.
Vr=2.0*b*pi*s
U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,372, to Tibbetts, is directed to a through hull assembly for a marine drive which includes a housing comprised of a forward and rear section and a shaft mounted therein. The housing is sealed and extends through the hull and contains thrust bearings at one end and needle bearings at the opposite end as well as lubricant.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,521,368, to Hingerty, Jr., is directed to an improved power transmission assembly for marine propulsion apparatus which is interposed in driving and thrust absorbing relation between the engine drive shaft and the propeller shaft of a boat.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,758,707, to Creighton, is directed to providing a mounting support for use in an inboard drive marine propulsion system. The center support and rear strut include one or more bearing assemblies as well as a seal for both ends of a support housing for preventing water from entering the support housing.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,400, to Newton et al, is directed to a sealing system for affecting a seal around a rotatable cylindrical shaft at a location wherein the shaft extends through a boat hull.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,863,737, to Kakihara, is directed to a stern tube bearing assembly having means for flowing a lubricating fluid from the fore end of the assembly to a reservoir at the aft end thereof before returning along the inside of the bearing.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,875,430, to Sirois, is directed to a method of assembling a marine propulsion assembly and boat.
These prior art patents disclose various constructions for marine propulsion systems. It would be highly desirable to utilize the disclosed self-contained shaft system that is enclosed, oil filled, shaft and includes a thrust bearing assembly which includes an oil pump to circulate the oil throughout the system. The system would reduce vibration and noise, allow more delivered horsepower to be used by the propeller, reduce installation time and increase the time between recommended maintenance.
Disclosed is an enclosed, oil filled shaft and thrust bearing assembly in a marine vessel. The enclosure eliminates the exposure of a drive shaft to the environment. In a conventional marine vessel drive shaft installation, the drive shaft is exposed to the saltwater thereby requiring sacrificial zincs to prevent premature corrosion and paint to prevent marine growth. Degradation of the zinc, as well as the paint, together with various environmental pressures can result in vibrations. The thrust bearing assembly allows the thrust to be directed to the shafts mounting system rather than through the vessels main propulsion engines and isolators thereby reducing vibration and noise emissions. In addition the elimination of thrust loading transmitted directly to the propulsion engines reduces wear and tear on the engine mounts, isolators and engine support structures. The non rotating casing of the shaft assembly, eliminates the Magnus Effect as can be calculated by the Kutta Jukowski theorem, allows clean water to flow to the propeller which allows more delivered horsepower to be used by the propeller. Anti-fouling paint will also last longer on a surface that does not rotate at high speeds.
Thus, it is an object of this invention to provide an affordable, enclosed shaft for propulsion of small boats. More specifically, my invention is an enclosed shaft system intended to replace existing fixed shaft technology as a single piece bolt on system.
Accordingly, it is a primary objective of the instant invention to substantially shorten the time required to install and align a shaft and engine system.
It is a further objective of the instant invention to substantially increase the maintenance interval of a drive shaft system, in the order of hundreds of hours before recommended maintenance.
It is yet another objective of the instant invention to deliver more horsepower to the propeller by on average due to reductions in friction within the drive train.
It is a still further objective of the invention is to provide advantages conventionally found in large commercial ships that can be mass produced for small pleasure craft.
It is a further object to provide linear support along the total length of the shaft by providing journal bearings that are evenly spaced along the shaft to prevent torque generated distortion along the shaft (formation of helix).
Other objectives and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with any accompanying drawings wherein are set forth, by way of illustration and example, certain embodiments of this invention. Any drawings contained herein constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention and illustrate various objects and features thereof.
a is an end view of the impeller rotor.
b is a side view of the impeller rotor.
Enclosed Shaft System. Referring first to
Journal Bearing or Bearings. Within the casing 30 there are one or more bronze journal bearings 31. These are fully hydrodynamic, i.e. they are fully submerged in fluid lubricant. The rotation of the shaft 10 pulls lubricant in the direction of rotation towards the center of the journal, and builds a dynamically generated pressure within the journal bearing 31, precluding metal-to-metal contact. In the preferred embodiment with proper tolerances, these bearings develop approximately 10 PSI at normal operating angular velocity. The principal purpose of the journal bearing 31 is to support the shaft 10 and reduce axial distortion under torsional loads, which can result in vibration and a reduction in the possible transmission of horsepower. A secondary benefit of the journal bearing 31 is to support the casing 30 against the shaft 10; the casing 30 is prone to deflection from dynamic pressure of the water flowing around it by motion of the vessel. As shown in
A nominal 2-inch (5-cm) shaft 10 will carry the rigidity or longitudinal stiffness of a 3.5-inch (8.9-cm) shaft because of this additional support. I have found that a series of journal bearings 31 spaced between 20 and 30 inches (51 and 76 cm) apart is beneficial to the overall operating efficiency of the shaft system.
Casing with Isolator Mount. The casing 30 is threaded at both ends allowing one end to be threaded into the propeller bearing housing 18 and the other end to be threaded into the isolator mount 90. Apart from the threaded connections at the ends, the casing 30 carries no thrust from the propeller assembly 19 and is only a housing or conduit containing lubricant for the bearings; there is only minimal mechanical loading within the casing 30. Once the casing 30 is installed, the strut barrel 16 is injected with a marine grade structural polyurethane adhesive 20, such as 3M 5200 in the preferred embodiment, flexibly attaching the casing to the strut, reducing noise transmission and reducing metal to metal contact, as shown in
Isolator Mount. Referring again to
Referring to
The urethane bushings 94 and 94′ are sized and are of the correct hardness that once compressed to the force that each model of shaft requires; they will transmit thrust to the hull structure 91 and flex sufficiently to provide a continuous water seal to the hull 91. Urethane has proved to be the preferred material in my invention due to its physical characteristics—it is impervious to most chemicals, retains tremendous dimensional stability (i.e., has no shape memory), retains stability at temperatures from −40 to +200° F. (−40 to 93° C.). The thrust assembly 50 is bolted directly to the isolator mount 90 thereby reducing the amount of space required within the hull relative to the conventional art. An O-ring seal 99 seals thrust assembly 50 to the isolator mount 90. The isolator mount 90 eliminates installation time for separate isolator and thrust assemblies, and further reduces total shaft installation time for a substantial saving to the boat manufacturer in overhead.
Thrust Assembly. Referring to
Forward thrust bearing 52 and reverse thrust bearing 53 are tapered roller bearings manufactured for their thrust bearing properties and their ability to circulate lubricant in a predictable fashion. The forward and reverse thrust bearings are of the known art and are not, in and of themselves, regarded as separate inventive matter in the context of my invention. In the preferred embodiment, Timken taper roller bearings are selected. Oil Impeller/Forward Thrust Bearing Sleeve. Referring again to
Impeller-distributor. The impeller-distributor 70 has a centrifugal component of its pumping action, aided by the natural tendency of a taper bearing to displace oil in the direction of the narrow end of the taper. This centrifugal action of a taper bearing is known art, and described by manufacturer literature including Timken Super Precision Bearings, a catalog of bearings and application notes. Referring now to
Seal Sleeve. Continuing to refer to
Coupling. The coupling or companion flange 11 may be keyed or splined to the shaft 10, depending on specific application. The end of shaft 10 is threaded and a stake nut is appropriately torqued against the coupling 11, and staked to a machined keyway on the threaded shaft 10 to prevent loosening.
Integrated coupling and seal sleeve. In the preferred embodiment, the seal sleeve 95 and companion flange 11 may be of one piece, and may be mounted to the shaft by a drilled and tapped hole in the coupling end of shaft 10.
Propeller Bearing Housing. Referring again to
Shaft. Drive shaft 10 is preferably made of high chromium stainless steel or better, noted for its high torsional strength and resistance to salt water corrosion. At the propeller end, drive shaft 10 is machined to conventional specifications with standard SAE or ISO taper and keyway or splines, and threaded to accept propeller retaining nuts and a cotter pin. At the inboard end, drive shaft 10 is machined with a shoulder to accommodate the thrust housing 51 and coupling component 11 to the inventor's own specifications, and threaded to accept a stake nut of the conventional art. A drive shaft 10 is preferably sized to accept the desired horsepower by applying a safety factor, generally a factor of 5.0 for Diesel engines and a factor of 2.0 for gasoline engines. Due to the extra support provided to the shaft system along its length by the casing 30 and attendant support bearings 31 (as shown in
All patents and publications mentioned in this specification are indicative of the levels of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. All patents and publications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
It is to be understood that while a certain form of the invention is illustrated, it is not to be limited to the specific form or arrangement herein described and shown. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention and the invention is not to be considered limited to what is shown and described in the specification and any drawings/figures included herein.
One skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objectives and obtain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as those inherent therein. The embodiments, methods, procedures and techniques described herein are presently representative of the preferred embodiments, are intended to be exemplary and are not intended as limitations on the scope. Changes therein and other uses will occur to those skilled in the art which are encompassed within the spirit of the invention and are defined by the scope of the appended claims. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.
This application is based and claims the filing date of Provisional Patent Application No. 60/828,379 filed Oct. 5, 2006 the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2072001 | Guthans | Feb 1937 | A |
2521368 | Hingerty, Jr. | Sep 1950 | A |
3580214 | Muller | May 1971 | A |
3863737 | Kakihara | Feb 1975 | A |
4127080 | Lakiza et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4786264 | Asanabe et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4813898 | Nakase et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4875430 | Sirois | Oct 1989 | A |
5310372 | Tibbetts | May 1994 | A |
5370400 | Newton et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5419724 | Wyland et al. | May 1995 | A |
6758707 | Creighton | Jul 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080214068 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60828379 | Oct 2006 | US |