This application is a national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2017/052354, filed Aug. 9, 2017, which claims the benefit of GB Application 1613794.5, filed Aug. 11, 2016. The entire contents of International Application No. PCT/GB2017/052354 and GB Application 1613794.5 are incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to the protection of personnel and equipment from injury and damage caused by projectiles and hazardous gas leaks generated as the result of a vacuum pump, valve or abatement equipment failure.
Deposition steps of semiconductor wafer processing employ a variety of precursor gases. These gases are often used inefficiently in the process, and any unused precursors and process by-products are pumped away from the chamber by vacuum pumps.
As the precursors and process by-products are pumped away from the chamber they continue to react and/or deposit solids inside the vacuum and/or abatement system. In particular, deposits can form in the dead volumes of the vacuum pumps that serve to convey the gases away from the chamber and in the exhaust lines and within abatement equipment through which the gases pass.
The maintenance of a semiconductor process chamber or vacuum and/or abatement system is usually carried out with great care to prevent exposure of any sections of the vacuum pump, valve or abatement equipment to oxygen or moisture during service of operation thereof.
For example, epitaxial processes use a mixture of chlorosilane precursors and hydrogen which are known to form potentially explosive deposits of polychlorosilane by-products in the pumping mechanism. At low pressure the process deposits do not pose a significant danger. However, upon exposure to the atmosphere, the deposits readily absorb oxygen which can start an energetic reaction between the deposited material and absorbed oxygen. The reaction may be of sufficient energy to cause an instantaneous explosion. This explosion may cause catastrophic failure of the body of the pump or the exhaust line. The explosion may result in projectiles of various sizes being formed, together with a corresponding increase in gas volume—thus creating a pressure wave.
Vacuum pump systems are often installed within enclosures. Such an enclosure may house several pumps, inlet lines, exhaust lines, valves and gas abatement equipment. The enclosures, on models such as the Edwards Limited Zenith™ combined pumping and abatement system, are manufactured from steel frames with thin gauge sheet metal. Removable panels are provided to allow service personnel access to the vacuum and abatement equipment installed within the enclosure. Provision of the enclosure permits the volume of gas defined therewithin to be extracted by the house duct system. This, in turn, protects personnel in the event of a gas leak from the equipment within the enclosure.
In the event of an explosive incident small projectiles, that are able to achieve higher velocities than larger projectiles, generally pass straight through the thin gauge sheet metal panels, whilst larger projectiles and the pressure wave created by expanding gas dislodge the panels from the supporting frame. These panels represent much larger projectiles which, in turn, create a potential source of injury or damage to either personnel or equipment in the vicinity.
One known method of preventing the generation of projectiles is to avoid the build up of potentially explosive deposits within the vacuum and/or abatement system. The continuous addition of gases such as oxygen or hydrochloric acid to a foreline of the pump during processing can cause a gradual reaction with the deposit within the vacuum and/or abatement system thus rendering it inert. However, many semiconductor wafer producers are reluctant to allow the addition of a reactive gas to the foreline due to concerns about the back-migration of the additive gases, which can affect the process chemistry in the process chamber.
Another known safety measure employed to mitigate damage by potential projectiles is to use high gauge, thick, steel for the enclosure housing the vacuum and/or abatement system. Such measures not only make it difficult for personnel to open and remove the doors to service the equipment housed in the enclosure but can also add a large capital cost to the equipment.
Therefore, there is a need in the industry for an improved enclosure system for the protection of personnel and equipment from injury and damage caused by projectiles generated as the result of a process by-product reaction whilst maintaining the ability to extract said enclosure to prevent injury due to leaks from the vacuum pump, abatement equipment and/or any associated ducts/valves.
According to the present disclosure, there is provided an enclosure for minimising egress of hazardous gases released from post process chamber equipment during operation thereof, the enclosure comprising a structural frame describing an outer envelope of post process chamber equipment to be housed therein; an outlet, configured to be connected to an extraction system; and a plurality of panels, each panel comprising a sub-frame to which is connected a mesh layer in combination with a non-porous, membrane layer, the layers being substantially co-planar with one another, wherein the panels are mounted to the enclosure frame in a contiguous manner such that, in use, a pressure internal to the enclosure, lower than that experienced external to the enclosure, can be maintained thereby inhibiting inadvertent egress of any hazardous gases present in the enclosure.
One or more of the panels may be removably mounted to the enclosure frame. This enables easy access to the interior of the enclosure thus facilitating servicing of equipment housed therein.
The membrane may comprise a rubber, for example from the group of neoprene, butyl and nitrile, or a polymer for example from the group of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) or polyethylene (PE).
The membrane of the membrane layer may be configured to rupture when subjected to high pressures, such as those experienced upon catastrophic failure of equipment housed within the enclosure. Such a catastrophic failure may occur when by-products deposited within a vacuum pump, abatement equipment, ducts or valves of the system explode. The thickness of the membrane may be in the range of 0.05 to 0.5 mm, preferably in the range of 0.05 to 0.1 mm.
Alternatively, the membrane layer may be configured to flap out of plane of the panel when subjected to the high pressures generated upon catastrophic failure of equipment housed within the enclosure. Thus the high pressure wave can pass out of the enclosure and the energy of the blast may be more readily dissipated avoiding damage that may be caused by containment thereof. In this embodiment the thickness of the membrane in the membrane layer is preferably in the range of 0.5 to 3 mm, more preferably in the range of 1 to 2 mm.
The mesh layer may be configured to contain projectiles formed upon catastrophic failure of equipment housed within the enclosure. Optimally, the mesh layer may comprise two sheets of wire mesh. It has been found that provision of two layers of mesh serves to contain the resulting projectiles, whilst not significantly increasing the weight of the corresponding panel so that access to the enclosure can still readily be achieved for service personnel.
Where the panel comprises more than one sheet of wire mesh, the membrane layer may be provided between two of the sheets of wire mesh, alternatively it may be provided on one side of the mesh layer.
By enclosing a vacuum and/or abatement system with a wire mesh in combination with a thin membrane, any projectiles (generated by an energetic reaction of process by-product) hit the wire mesh, which causes the projectiles to lose momentum and thus reduce the likelihood of them injuring personnel or damaging neighbouring equipment. During normal operation, the thin, non-porous membrane seals the enclosed volume sufficiently to allow a slightly lower pressure (a few mbar) than atmospheric pressure to be maintained within the enclosure. This pressure difference enables the extraction of the enclosed volume and prevents leakage, into the working area, of hazardous gases originating from the vacuum and/or abatement system. Such an enclosure may be used to surround equipment employed to evacuate and abate a variety of semiconductor process chambers producing potentially explosive solid by-products, for example Epitaxial process chambers.
The use of wire mesh can replace the need for thick gauge steel plates, thus reducing the capital cost of the enclosure and increasing the ease with which the doors can be opened/panels removed by service personnel to access the equipment within the enclosure system. The use of a thin, non-porous, membrane creates a sufficient seal such that the enclosure system can be attached to an extract duct as a safety measure against possible dangerous gas leaks from any device housed within the enclosure system.
The generation of projectiles by an energetic reaction of process by-product will be accompanied by an instantaneous expansion of gas which will be generated in the explosive reaction. Therefore, it is advantageous that the panels, consisting of a wire mesh with a thin non-porous membrane, surrounding the pump comprise a means for the release of gas from within the enclosed volume. The ability to release and prevent the build-up of pressure generated in the explosion reduces the possible deformation of the wire mesh and/or ejection of the panel, which would compromise the protection offered by the wire mesh with a thin non-porous membrane.
The wire mesh with a membrane surrounding the pump and/or abatement equipment may, advantageously, be comprised of separate panels. This enables service personnel to gain access to a particular area of equipment by removing individual panels. The wire mesh with a membrane surrounding the equipment may comprise a plurality of separate panels, for example around each of the vertically extending sides of the pump and the enclosure floor and ceiling. Any combination of thick gauge steel and wire mesh with membrane panels can be utilised providing protection against projectiles propelled in all directions around the equipment.
Projectiles can be generated with velocities of between 10 m/s and 120 m/s. Those of greatest concern are those with a velocity of between 60 m/s and 120 m/s, therefore the wire mesh is preferably configured to prevent projectiles with a kinetic energy of between 150 joules and 450 joules from passing therethrough.
Other preferred and/or optional aspects of the disclosure are defined in the accompanying claims.
In order that the present disclosure may be well understood, an embodiment thereof, which is given by way of example only, will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawing.
The enclosure system 2 comprises a metal frame 12 configured to describe an outer envelope of a working space surrounding the post-chamber equipment 4. A number of panels 14 are affixed to the frame 12 to form walls and a ceiling of the enclosure system 2. One or more of the panels 14 may be removably connected to the frame 12 or they may be configured to be connected using a hinge, or similar mechanism, to form doors. Thus, access points into the enclosure system 2, and therefore any equipment therein, by service personnel may be provided. Such access may be effected either by opening the doors and/or completely removing the, or each, respective panel from the enclosure.
An alternatively configured panel 14b is illustrated in
In a further alternative, as illustrated in
Upon installation, panels 14b and 14c may be orientated such that the membrane 16 forms an internal surface of the enclosure 2 with the mesh 18 representing the external surface or the membrane 16 may be the external surface with the mesh 18 forming an internal surface.
Each mesh panel 18 may comprise a single sheet of wire mesh or it may comprise a number of sheets of wire mesh in combination. Preferably, two wire mesh sheets are provided in each panel 14, either using the configuration illustrated in
The membrane material may comprise a rubber (for example from the group of neoprene, butyl and nitrile) or it may comprise a polymer (for example from the group of PVC, PET, PTFE, PE), however, any thin, frangible, non-porous material may be used. The membrane or film used in panels 14a, 14b, 14c would have a thickness in the range of 0.05 to 0.5 mm, more preferably in the range of 0.05 to 0.1 mm.
An alternatively configured panel 14d is illustrated in
Returning to
Continuous extraction during operation is necessary as a safety precaution to prevent any leaked hazardous process fluids from contaminating the atmosphere outside the enclosure where personnel are located. The rate of extraction from the enclosure 2 is typically in the order of 4 to 5 air changes per minute.
The configuration of the enclosure system 2 must be such to enable extraction to occur. In other words, whilst the panels 14 need not be hermetically sealed to one another via the frame 12, a sufficient level of sealing must be achieved to prevent/inhibit ingress of air so that a pressure differential (of a few, say 2 to 20 mbar) between the interior and the exterior of the enclosure can be maintained. Thereby the enclosure system 2 retains any hazardous gases in the vicinity of the vacuum and/or abatement system 4 and the volume of the enclosure is safely extracted via an extraction duct connected to outlet 30.
If a failure event is experienced, whereby material deposited within the equipment 4 becomes explosive, two primary effects will be realised. Fragments of the body of the apparatus will be formed as the catastrophic failure occurs. These fragments will form high velocity projectiles, capable of wreaking serious damage upon proximate equipment. The second aspect of the explosive incident will be a significant high pressure disturbance which, if contained, can also cause a great deal of damage to structural components in the area. Indeed, in a conventional system, such a pressure wave can destroy the enclosure and turn the panels of the enclosure itself into further projectiles that are likely to contribute to the damage caused.
In an enclosure of the type represented by the present disclosure, these catastrophic effects are somewhat mitigated. In the first instance, the thin membranes 16 would be ruptured by the overpressures created by the explosion. Consequently, rather than containing and reflecting the overpressure, the high pressure wave will be transmitted outside the enclosure and will rapidly be dissipated. Energy will be dispersed and hence, the panels 14 of the enclosure system 2 will not be dislodged simply by virtue of the overpressures experienced within the enclosure. In the alternative embodiment illustrated in
The mesh sheets of the panels 18 absorb and disperse the impact energy of projectiles formed from the fragments of the apparatus generated during the explosive incident. As an example, each mesh sheet serves to prevent projectiles having kinetic energy of between 150 joules and 450 joules from escaping from the enclosure system. Additional energy from projectiles is absorbed by each successive mesh sheet of a panel 18 until all the energy is removed and the projectiles are eventually stopped or at least slowed significantly to minimize the damage caused thereby. It is preferred that two mesh sheets are provided in each panel as discussed above.
As a result, providing an enclosure according to the present disclosure around a vacuum and/or abatement system, serves to protect personnel working in the vicinity from injury caused by projectiles generated as a result of an energetic reaction of process by-product of the pump, valve or abatement equipment.
Whilst the embodiments described herein comprise panels according to the disclosure exclusively, it is envisaged that these panels can be provided in combination with more conventional metal plates for some sections of the enclosure but the effectiveness of the mitigating measures will, correspondingly be reduced and the plates may represent hazardous projectiles. Alternatively, the support structure 20 of some or each of the panels 14 may be formed integrally with the structural frame 12 of the enclosure 2. In this instance the enclosure will take longer to install and access into the enclosure would be less readily achieved. A combined approach is envisaged in this integral approach, whereby one or more sections of the enclosure comprise panels 14 of the type comprising an external structural framework 20 that can be removably mounted on and connected to the main enclosure frame 12.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1613794 | Aug 2016 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2017/052354 | 8/9/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/029475 | 2/15/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4325309 | King et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
6119422 | Clear et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
10153546 | Kolak et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20110123355 | Davidson | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202182221 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102010046504 | Mar 2012 | DE |
2025825 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2111593 | Jul 1983 | GB |
10-2011-0040968 | Apr 2011 | KR |
10-2016-0035574 | Mar 2016 | KR |
2005108837 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2010015847 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2011098764 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2012041281 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) dated Feb. 13, 2017 in counterpart GB application No. GB1613794.5, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 7, 2017 in counterpart international application No. PCT/GB2017/052354, 10 pp. |
The Notification of Preliminary Rejection, and translation thereof, from counterpart Korean Application No. 10-2019-7003868, dated Sep. 28, 2021, 10 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190170142 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |