Encrypted CCNx

Abstract
One embodiment provides a system that facilitates selective encryption of bit groups of a message. During operation, the system determines, by a content requesting device or content producing device, a message that includes a plurality of bit groups, each corresponding to a type, a length, and a set of values, wherein one or more bit groups are marked for encryption, and wherein the message indicates a name that is a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier comprising contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level. The system computes a plurality of cipher blocks for the message based on an authenticated encryption protocol. The system encrypts the one or more bit groups marked for encryption based on one or more symmetric keys, wherein the marked bit groups include one or more name components. Subsequently, the system indicates the encrypted bit groups as encrypted.
Description
RELATED APPLICATION

The subject matter of this application is related to the subject matter in the following applications:

    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/847,814, entitled “ORDERED-ELEMENT NAMING FOR NAME-BASED PACKET FORWARDING,” by inventor Ignacio Solis, filed 20 Mar. 2013 (hereinafter “U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/847,814”);
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,175, entitled “CONTROLLING THE SPREAD OF INTERESTS AND CONTENT IN A CONTENT CENTRIC NETWORK,” by inventors Van L. Jacobson and Diana K. Smetters, filed 18 Dec. 2008 (hereinafter “U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,175”);
    • U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,622, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING COMMUNICATION IN A CONTENT CENTRIC NETWORK,” by inventors Van Jacobson, filed 11 Dec. 2008 (hereinafter “U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,622”);
    • U.S. Pat. No. 8,204,060, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FACILITATING FORWARDING A PACKET IN A CONTENT-CENTRIC NETWORK,” by inventor Van L. Jacobson and James D. Thornton, filed 17 Dec. 2009 (hereinafter “U.S. Pat. No. 8,204,060”); and
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/065,691, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HASH-BASED FORWARDING OF PACKETS WITH HIERARCHICALLY STRUCTURED VARIABLE-LENGTH IDENTIFIERS,” by inventors Marc E. Mosko and Michael F. Plass, filed 29 Oct. 2013 (hereinafter “U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/065,691”);


      the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.


BACKGROUND

Field


This disclosure is generally related to distribution of digital content. More specifically, this disclosure is related to a system and method for selectively encrypting bit groups (such as name components) based on multiple symmetric keys in a content centric network message.


Related Art


The proliferation of the Internet and e-commerce continues to create a vast amount of digital content. Content centric network (CCN) architectures have been designed to facilitate accessing and processing such digital content. A CCN includes entities, or nodes, such as network clients, forwarders (e.g., routers), and content producers, which communicate with each other by sending interest packets for various content items and receiving content object packets in return. CCN interests and content objects are identified by their unique names, which are typically hierarchically structured variable length identifiers (HSVLI). An HSVLI can include contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level.


Part of a CCN name can be used for routing purposes, and part of the name can contain sensitive data. For example, some name components may be used by an intermediate node to perform forwarding and caching, while other name components may contain private user information or application-specific data. Current CCN packet formats may include authentication as a primary objective, while previous CCN packet formats may include encryption functionality but are designed to encrypt only the payload while providing authentication for the entire packet. These packet formats do not allow for session-based and pair-wise encryption between two entities, nor do they provide a way to selectively encrypt portions of a CCN packet or message.


SUMMARY

One embodiment provides a system that facilitates selective encryption of bit groups of a message. During operation, the system determines, by a content requesting device or content producing device, a message that includes a plurality of bit groups, each corresponding to a type, a length, and a set of values, wherein one or more bit groups are marked for encryption, and wherein the message indicates a name that is a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier comprising contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level. The system computes a plurality of cipher blocks for the message based on an authenticated encryption protocol. The system encrypts the one or more bit groups marked for encryption based on one or more symmetric keys, wherein the marked bit groups include one or more name components. Subsequently, the system indicates the encrypted bit groups as encrypted.


In some embodiments, the message is an interest packet or a content object packet.


In some embodiments, the system transmits the selectively encrypted message to a content producing device or a content requesting device.


In some embodiments, computing the cipher blocks is further based on beginning at byte zero of the message.


In some embodiments, computing the cipher blocks is further based on an Advanced Encryption Standard using a key with a length of 128 bits.


In some embodiments, encrypting the bit groups is further based on an exclusive disjunction operation.


In some embodiments, indicating the encrypted bit groups as encrypted comprises one or more of: setting a field associated with the bit group in the message; and setting a reserved bit associated with the bit group in the message.


In some embodiments, the system includes in a validation section for the message a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys.


In some embodiments, the system further comprises one or more of the following: wherein a symmetric key is exchanged via a public key operation; wherein a symmetric key is encrypted based on a public key included in the message; wherein the validation section is based on a symmetric key cryptographic system with encryption; wherein a public key identifier of the content producing device is included in the message; and wherein a short symmetric key identifier is specified for use in subsequent messages between the content requesting device and the content producing device.


In some embodiments, the system further comprises one or more of the following: wherein the public key operation is based on a cryptographic system that is RSA-SHA256; and wherein the short symmetric key identifier is a random number that is not derived from the symmetric key.


In some embodiments, the system receives the selectively encrypted message. In response to verifying authentication information associated with the message, the system decrypts, for each bit group indicated as encrypted, the encrypted bit group based on a corresponding symmetric key, wherein a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys are included in a validation section for the message. The system indicates the decrypted bit groups as decrypted.


In some embodiments, verifying the authentication information associated with the message further comprises: looking up in a storage a key identifier associated with the message; and verifying a signature or a message authentication code based on the key identifier.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network facilitating selective encryption of bit groups of a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 presents a flow chart illustrating a method by a content requesting device or a content producing device for selectively encrypting a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 presents a flow chart illustrating a method by a content requesting device or a content producing device for verifying and decrypting a selectively encrypted CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4A illustrates an exemplary format for a selectively encrypted CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4B illustrates an exemplary format for a selectively encrypted CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4C illustrates an exemplary format for a selectively encrypted CCN message with nested encryption, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4D illustrates an exemplary format for an encoding graph with a post-order traversal, corresponding to the exemplary format for the message in FIG. 4C, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4E illustrates an exemplary format for an encoding graph with a reverse post-order traversal, corresponding to the exemplary format for the message in FIG. 4C, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary format for a validation section of a selectively encrypted CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary apparatus that facilitates selective encryption of bit groups of a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary computer system that facilitates selective encryption of bit groups of a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.


Overview


Embodiments of the present invention provide a system which solves the problem of effectively combining authentication and encryption for a packet by facilitating two communicating entities to use multiple different and mutually known keys to encrypt selected portions of a CCN message. Assume that two entities, such as a consumer and a producer, share multiple secret keys based on a known key exchange protocol. The consumer may wish to transmit an interest packet where portions, or “bit groups,” of the packet may require encryption. For example, the name components of the interest name may contain both routable information and sensitive, application-specific information. The consumer may selectively encrypt various name components by placing a container around a name component, marking the name component as encrypted based on a specific key, and indicating the specific key in a validation section for the packet. Exemplary packet formats with encrypted containers are described below in relation to FIGS. 4A-C. The producer can receive the selectively encrypted interest, verify authentication information in the validation section based on the specific keys indicated, and subsequently decrypt each encrypted name component (or bit group) based on the indicated key. The producer can generate a responsive content object and assign the responsive content object with the same selectively encrypted name as the incoming interest. Based on the same methods used by the consumer to selectively encrypt the interest, the producer can also encrypt additional portions of the responsive content object based on other mutually known keys.


Specifically, the system uses an authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD) scheme which simultaneously protects both the privacy and authenticity/integrity of encapsulated data. Given a TLV-formatted packet (e.g., a packet comprised of bit groups where each bit group corresponds to a type, a length, and a set of values), a consumer may use an AEAD scheme to encrypt selective bit groups (such as name components) for the packet. An example of an AEAD scheme that follows an “encrypt-then-authenticate” paradigm as used with a modified TLV-formatted CCN packet is described below in the section entitled “Exemplar Authenticated Encryption Protocol Over Encrypted Containers.”


The following terms describe elements of a CCN architecture:

    • Content Object or “content object”: A single piece of named data, which is bound to a unique name. Content Objects are “persistent,” which means that a Content Object can move around within a computing device, or across different computing devices, but does not change. If any component of the Content Object changes, the entity that made the change creates a new Content Object that includes the updated content, and binds the new Content Object to a new unique name.
    • Unique Names: A name in a CCN is typically location independent and uniquely identifies a Content Object. A data-forwarding device can use the name or name prefix to forward a packet toward a network node that generates or stores the Content Object, regardless of a network address or physical location for the Content Object. In some embodiments, the name may be a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI). The HSVLI can be divided into several hierarchical components, which can be structured in various ways. For example, the individual name components parc, home, ccn, and test.txt can be structured in a left-oriented prefix-major fashion to form the name “/parc/home/ccn/test.txt.” Thus, the name “/parc/home/ccn” can be a “parent” or “prefix” of “/parc/home/ccn/test.txt.” Additional components can be used to distinguish between different versions of the content item, such as a collaborative document.
    • In some embodiments, the name can include a non-hierarchical identifier, such as a hash value that is derived from the Content Object's data (e.g., a checksum value) and/or from elements of the Content Object's name. A description of a hash-based name is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/847,814, which is hereby incorporated by reference. A name can also be a flat label. Hereinafter, “name” is used to refer to any name for a piece of data in a name-data network, such as a hierarchical name or name prefix, a flat name, a fixed-length name, an arbitrary-length name, or a label (e.g., a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) label).
    • Interest or “interest”: A packet that indicates a request for a piece of data, and includes a name (or a name prefix) for the piece of data. A data consumer can disseminate a request or Interest across an information-centric network, which CCN routers can propagate toward a storage device (e.g., a cache server) or a data producer that can provide the requested data to satisfy the request or Interest.


The methods disclosed herein are not limited to CCN networks and are applicable to other architectures as well. A description of a CCN architecture is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,175, which is hereby incorporated by reference.


Exemplary Network and Communication



FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network facilitating selective encryption of bit groups of a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Network 100 can be a content centric network (CCN) and can include a client device 116, a content producing device 118, and a router or other forwarding device at nodes 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, and 114. A CCN router can be a CCN forwarding device residing on top of an IP router. In other words, CCN can be implemented as an overlay on top of IP. Other CCN overlay architecture is also possible. A node can be a computer system, an end-point representing users, and/or a device that can generate interests or originate content.


A requesting entity or content consumer (such as device 116) can generate or determine an interest 130 with an original name of “/a/b/c/d/e.” Consumer 116 can selectively encrypt interest 130 via an encrypt 140 function, which results in an interest 132 with a selectively encrypted name of “/a/b/EK2{c}/EK3{/d/e}.” Interest 132 has two selectively encrypted name components (e.g., “containers” or “bit groups”): 1) name component “c” is encrypted using the symmetric key K2; and 2) name components “/d/e” are encrypted using the symmetric key K3. The keys K2 and K3 are mutually known to consumer 116 and producer 118. Possible key exchange protocols are described below in the section entitled “Possible Methods for Sharing Symmetric Keys.” For each symmetric key used to encrypt a name component, the encrypt 140 function can be further based on an authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD) protocol. As described below, an AEAD scheme can generate an authenticator tag for a respective encrypted container, and consumer 116 can include the authenticator tag in a corresponding validation section for the message. Consumer 116 can transmit selectively encrypted interest 132 through the network. Interest 132 is received and forwarded by intermediate nodes 102 and 114, until it reaches content producing device or content producer 118.


Producer 118 verifies the authentication information (e.g., the authenticator tag included in the validation section for the message). Upon properly verifying the authentication information, producer 118 decrypts each encrypted name component for interest 132 via a decrypt 142 function, based on the information in the validation section. The validation section includes information to identify which symmetric key to use for each encrypted name component (or bit group), as described below in relation to FIG. 5. The decrypt 142 function results in interest 130 with the original name “/a/b/c/d/e.” Producer 118 then generates or produces a content object 131 that is responsive to interest 130. Producer 118 can selectively encrypt content object 131 (e.g., name components of content object 131) to match the name for interest 132 via an encrypt 144 function, which results in content object 133. Producer 118 can also encrypt other bit groups of content object 133 using the same encryption keys previously used by consumer 116 (e.g., K2 and K3). Producer 118 can further encrypt other bit groups of content object 133 using yet another symmetric key shared between the parties (e.g., K4, not shown). In some embodiments, producer 118 can also wrap content object 133 with an outer container, as described below in the section entitled “Wrapping Method.” Producer 118 can transmit content object 133 through the network. Content object 133 travels on a reverse path as interest 132, e.g., back through intermediate nodes 114 and 102, until it reaches consumer 116.


Upon receiving content object 133, consumer 116 performs similar steps to verify and decrypt selectively encrypted content object 133 as producer 118 performs to verify and decrypt selectively encrypted interest 132. For example, consumer 116 verifies the authentication information in content object 133, and upon verifying the authentication information, consumer 116 begins decrypting the encrypted bit groups or name components of content object 133 via a decrypt 146 function, based on the information in the validation section. The decrypt 146 function results in a content object 131 with the original name “/a/b/c/d/e.” Consumer 116 can subsequently perform a lookup and clear a corresponding entry in its pending interest table (PIT) for interest 132 and/or interest 130.


Selectively Encrypting a CCN Message



FIG. 2 presents a flow chart 200 illustrating a method by a content requesting device or a content producing device for selectively encrypting a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. During operation, the system determines, by a content producing device or a content requesting device, a message that includes a plurality of bit groups, where each bit group corresponds to a type, a length, and a set of values, and where one or more bits are marked for encryption (operation 202). The message also indicates a name that is a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier comprising contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level. The message can be an interest packet or a content object packet. The system then computes a plurality of cipher blocks for the message based on an authenticated encryption protocol (operation 204). The authenticated encryption protocol can be an “encrypt-then-authenticate” scheme that simultaneously encrypts and authenticates more data than it encrypts. One example of such an authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD) scheme is Advanced Encryption Standard in Galois/Counter Mode (AES-GCM), as described below. The system encrypts the one or more bit groups marked for encryption based on one or more symmetric keys, where the marked bit groups include one or more name components (operation 206). The bit groups can also include the payload and any other bit groups or TLV-formatted groups that an encryptor may wish to encrypt. In addition, the encryptor can perform a nested encryption of bit groups, as described below in relation to FIG. 4C.


The system includes in a validation section for the message a nonce and a key identifier (KeyId) for each of the symmetric keys used to encrypt a bit group (operation 208). Possible symmetric key exchange protocols are discussed below in the section entitled “Possible Methods For Sharing Symmetric Keys.” Subsequently, the system transmits the selectively encrypted message to another entity (operation 210). For example, the CCN message can be an interest packet that is selectively encrypted and transmitted from a content requesting device to a content producing device. The content producing device can subsequently return to the content requesting device a responsive content object that has the same selectively encrypted name. The responsive content object can be further selectively encrypted.


Exemplar Authenticated Encryption Protocol Over Encrypted Containers


Block cipher modes of operation can simultaneously protect both the privacy and the authenticity or integrity of encapsulated data. Such authenticated encryption (AE) schemes can also authenticate more data than they encrypt, and are referred to as authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD) schemes. One example of an AEAD scheme is the Advance Encryption Standard in Galois/Counter Mode (AES-GCM), used with block ciphers with a block size of 128 bits. AES-GCM uses the “encrypt-then-authenticate” paradigm. The scheme is based on a secret key K, a nonce (e.g., Initialization Vector or IV), and a counter per nonce. The selectively encrypted packet carries a KeyId and a nonce. As described in IETF RFC 4106, “The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)” (June 2005) (hereinafter “RFC 4106”), which disclosure is herein incorporated in its entirety, the KeyId identifies a (key, salt) pair which is created during association setup. The nonce is 1-8 bytes in size and is carried in the validation section for the packet, as described below in relation to FIG. 5. The nonce is left-padded with zeros to 8 bytes and appended to the salt to form the GCM-AES IV. Note that the nonce in the packet may also be a counter.


To encrypt the packet using the GCM-AES scheme, an encryptor uses the following inputs: the secret key K; distinct Initialization Vectors IV (typically 96 bits); plaintext P (up to 239-256 bits); and associated data A (up to 264 bits). Using these inputs, the encryptor creates the following outputs: the ciphertext C (with a length equal to P); and the authentication tag T (0-128 bits). Authentication tag T is constructed by feeding blocks of data into the GHASH function and encrypting the result. For example, the GHASH function can be defined by GHASH(H,A,C): H is the hash key, a string of 128 zero-bits encrypted using the block cipher; A is the associated data which is only authenticated but not encrypted; and C is the ciphertext. Thus, the function GHASH of GCM-AES is performed over all of C and A for each encrypted container.


The decryptor receives the outputs, C and T, along with A (which can include a plaintext header, tail, or other meta information), and can determine K and IV based on a previous key exchange protocol. The decryptor thus uses inputs K, IV, C, A, and T to determine the output, which is either the plaintext P or a “FAIL” result.


Each encrypted bit group of a CCN message is an independent key/nonce execution of the GCM-AES scheme. The encryptor can perform an exclusive disjunction (i.e., XOR) operation on the “value” of the encrypted container. Thus, the ciphertext C contains a mixture of some XOR'd bytes and some plaintext bytes. The associated data A comprises all prior validation sections as well as the current validation section. An exemplary format of a validation section is described below in relation to FIG. 5.


The byte counter can run from byte 0 of the message to the end of the message to clarify that the ciphertext C is the entire CCNx message. An encryptor does not need to compute AES blocks E(K,Yi) for message sections that fall outside of the XOR range. In some embodiments, the encryptor can use only the “value” bytes of specific encrypted containers and perform encryption over the compacted range. While this may provide more compatibility with existing GCM-AES implementations, the encryptor may need to make all the uncovered bytes part of the associated data A, which may require additional overhead to properly encode the lengths.


Possible Methods for Sharing Symmetric Keys


Communicating entities need to exchange symmetric keys. In one method, the entities exchange symmetric keys via a public key operation. The public key operation can be based on a cryptographic system that is, e.g., RSA-SHA256. The wrapped key can be included in the message using the key, i.e., the message embeds its own decryption key under a public key operation. In another method, two communicating entities exchange a separate message with the wrapped key, then refer to it with an agreed to identifier. In another method, two communicating entities use an on-line key exchange mechanism, such as a version of Diffie Hillman key exchange.


Communicating entities need to identify the symmetric key(s) used to encrypt portions of a message. In embodiments of the present invention, the encryptor can establish one or more encryption contexts identified by a given TLV Type value. At the end of the message, in the ValidationAlgorithm section, the encryptor can associate the encryption context with a KeyId for the symmetric key. The KeyId of a symmetric key may be a small integer value agreed upon by the parties. The KeyId values may be relative to the name prefix used in the message exchanges, which allows the same KeyId value to be used in multiple communications with different name prefixes without ambiguity.


Verifying and Decrypting a Selectively Encrypted CCN Message



FIG. 3 presents a flow chart 300 illustrating a method by a content requesting device or a content producing device for verifying and decrypting a selectively encrypted CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. During operation, the system receives, by a content producing device or a content requesting device, a message that includes a plurality of bit groups, each corresponding to a type, a length, and a set of values, wherein one or more bit groups are indicated as encrypted (operation 302). The message also indicates a name that is a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier comprising contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level. The system determines whether the authentication information is verified (decision 304). For example, the system can look up in a key storage the key identifier. If the key identifier is found, the system can subsequently verify the authenticator tag(s) (e.g., a CWC-MAC signature) included in the validation section. If the authentication information is not verified, the system drops or discards the message (operation 306) and the operation returns. If the authentication information is verified, the system decrypts each bit group that is indicated as encrypted based on the corresponding symmetric key (operation 308).


Exemplary Format for Selectively Encrypted CCN Messages



FIG. 4A illustrates an exemplary format for a selectively encrypted CCN message 400, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Message 400 can include a fixed header 402, optional headers 404, a message type 406, a message length 408, and a message value that comprises fields 410 and 412 and the fields shown in lines 414, 426, 436, 442, 452, 458, and 462. Field 410 can be a type field with a value of “T_NAME” and field 412 can be a length field with a value equal to “Name Length.” Line 414 can include TLV values for the first and second name components of a name: “T0,” “L0,” and “V0”; and “T1,” “L1,” and “V1.” Line 426 can include an indicator that the subsequent value or bit group (e.g., the third name component) is an encrypted value based on a specific symmetric key. For example, line 426 can include a type field with a value of “TE2,” a length field with a value of “LE2=L2+4” (e.g., the length of the third name component plus four bytes for the corresponding type and length fields, with values of “T2” and “L2,” respectively), and a value field that comprises the encrypted version of the bit group for the third name component (e.g., “T2,” “L2,” and “V2”), as indicated by the patterned background. The TE values may be selected from a range of values, which link to corresponding validation sections for each TE. The authentication range for each TE is over the entire CCN message. Furthermore, each TE indicates a value that is an independent key/nonce execution of the underlying AEAD scheme, e.g., GCM-AES. A validation section for TE2 is included in the message at line 468, as described below.


Line 436 can include TLV values for the fourth name component of a name: “T3,” “L3,” and “V3.” Line 442 can include an indicator that the subsequent value or bit group (e.g., the fifth name component) is an encrypted value. For example, line 442 can include a type field with a value of “TE4,” a length field with a value of “LE4=L4+4” (e.g., the length of the fifth name component plus four bytes for the corresponding type and length fields, with values of “T4” and “L4,” respectively), and a value field that comprises the encrypted version of the bit group for the fifth name component (e.g., “T4,” “L4,” and “V4”), as indicated by the patterned background. A validation section for TE4 is included in the message at line 470.


Line 452 includes another TLV bit group that has a type of “T_EXPIRY” and a corresponding length and value. Line 458 can include an indicator that the subsequent value or bit group (e.g., the payload of the message) is an encrypted value. For example, line 458 can include a type field with a value of “TE5,” a length field with a value of “LE5=L5+4” (e.g., the length of the payload component plus four bytes for the corresponding type and length fields, with values of “T_PAYLOAD” and “L5,” respectively), and a value field that comprises the encrypted version of the bit group for the payload (e.g., “T_PAYLOAD,” “L5,” and “Value”), as indicated by the patterned background.


Message 400 can also include a validation section that corresponds to each encryption scheme used in message 400. The validation sections can be included linearly, or, in the case of nested encryption, based on a post-order traversal. Message 400 can include a line 468 that indicates the validation algorithm and validation payload corresponding to the encryption marked by “TE2” at line 426. Message 400 can also include lines 470 and 472, which indicate the validation algorithm and validation payload corresponding to the encryption marked, respectively, by “TE4” at line 442 and by “TE5” at line 458. An exemplary format of a validation section is described below in relation to FIG. 5.


Given an original name such as “/a/b/c/d/e” for an interest, the selectively encrypted version of the name based on message 400 may be “/a/b/EK2{c}/d/EK4{e},” where K2 is indicated as the symmetric key used to encrypt the third name component, “c,” and K4 is indicated as the symmetric key used to encrypt the fifth name component, “e.”



FIG. 4B illustrates an exemplary format for a selectively encrypted CCN message 480, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Message 480 can include similar fields as message 400 of FIG. 4A (different fields are marked with a dotted circle around the corresponding label), including fixed header 402, optional headers 404, message type 406, message length 408, and a message value that comprises fields 410 and 412 and the fields shown in lines 414, 426, 474, 452, 458, and 462. Lines 414 and 426 include similar information as in FIG. 4A for the first, second, and third name components. Line 474 can include an indicator that the subsequent value or bit group (e.g., the fourth and fifth name components) is an encrypted value. For example, line 474 can include a type field with a value of “TE3,” a length field with a value of “LE3=L3+L4+8” (e.g., the length of the fourth name component plus the length of the fifth name component plus eight bytes for the respective corresponding type and length fields, with values of “T3,” “L3,” “T4,” and “L4,” respectively), and a value field that comprises the encrypted version of the bit group for the fourth and fifth name components (e.g.: “T3,” “L3,” and “V3”; and “T4,” “L4,” and “V4”), as indicated by the patterned background. Lines 452, 458, 462, 468, and 472 of message 480 include similar information as described in relation to message 400 of FIG. 4A. Message 480 does include a line 476 that indicates the validation algorithm and validation payload corresponding to the encryption marked by “TE3 in message 480 at line 474.


Given an original name such as “/a/b/c/d/e” for an interest, the selectively encrypted version of the name based on message 480 may be “/a/b/EK2{c}/EK3{/d/e},” where K2 is indicated as the symmetric key used to encrypt the third name component, “c,” and K3 is indicated as the symmetric key used to encrypt the fourth and fifth name components, “/d/e”.



FIG. 4C illustrates an exemplary format for a selectively encrypted CCN message 490 with nested encryption, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Message 490 can include similar fields as message 400 of FIG. 4A, including fixed header 402, optional headers 404, message type 406, message length 408, and a message value that comprises fields 410 and 412 and the fields shown in lines 414, 482, 492, 452, 458, and 462. Line 414 includes similar information as in FIG. 4A for the first and second name components.


Line 482 can include an indicator that the subsequent value or bit group (e.g., the third name component, and then, in a nested encryption, the fourth and fifth name components) is an encrypted value. For example, line 482 can include a type field with a value of “TE2” and a length field with a value of “LE2=L2+4+L3+L4+12.” “LE2” is calculated based on the length of the third name component plus four bytes for the corresponding type and length fields (with values of “T2” and “L2”), plus the length of the fourth and fifth name components plus 12 bytes for the respective corresponding type and length fields (with values of “TE3,” LE3,” “T3,” “L3,” “T4,” and “L4,” respectively). Line 482 can also include a value field that comprises both the encrypted version of the bit group for the third name component (e.g., “T2,” “L2,” and “V2”), as indicated by the patterned background, and the nested encryption depicted in line 492. Line 492 indicates a nested encryption that is included in the TE2 container of line 482. Line 492 can include a type field with a value of “TE3” and a length field with a value of “LE3=L3+L4+8.” “LE3” is calculated based on the length of the fourth and fifth name components plus eight bytes for the corresponding type and length fields (with values of “T3,” “L3,” “T4,” and “L4,” respectively). Line 492 can also include a value field that comprises the encrypted version of the bit group for the fourth and fifth name components (e.g., “T3,” “L3,” “V3,” “T4,” “L4,” and “V4”), as indicated by the patterned background.


Lines 452, 458, 462, and 472 of message 490 include similar information as described in relation to message 400 of FIG. 4A. The validation sections included in message 490 are slightly different based on the nested encryption of the TE3 values (fourth and fifth name components) within the TE2 encryption container. In general, an encryptor includes a validation section for each encrypted context or container. For a nested encryption, the validation section corresponding to the nested encryption must also be encrypted under the same parent container. For example, TE3 is a nested encryption under TE2, so the validation section corresponding to TE3 is also encrypted under TE2. Message 480 includes a line 494 which depicts this scenario. Line 494 includes an indicator that the subsequent value (e.g., the TE3 validation section) is an encrypted value. Line 494 can include a type field with a value of “TE2” and a length field for a value of “L” that corresponds to the length of the validation section for TE3. Line 496 indicates the validation algorithm and validation payload corresponding to the encryption marked by “TE2,” and line 472 indicates the validation algorithm and validation payload corresponding to the encryption marked by “TE5.”


Given an original name such as “/a/b/c/d/e” for an interest, the selectively encrypted version of the name based on message 490 may be “/a/b/EK2{c, EK3{/d/e} },” where K2 is indicated as the symmetric key used to encrypt the third name component, “c,” and the (nested) encrypted version of the fourth and fifth name components, and K3 is indicated as the symmetric key used to encrypt the fourth and fifth name components, “/d/e”.



FIG. 4D illustrates an exemplary format for an encoding graph 498 with a post-order traversal, corresponding to the exemplary format for message 490 in FIG. 4C, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Graph 498 depicts containment of bit groups as left nodes and sequential ordering of bit groups as right nodes. Functions 498.1, 498.2, and 498.3 correspond to a depth-first search post-order for encrypting the bit groups in their respective containers. For example, function 498.1 is the first function performed and corresponds to the inner TE3 container for encrypting the T3 and T4 name components (marked with a “1” in a circle). Based on the post-order traversal, the next function is function 498.2, which corresponds to the TE2 container for encrypting the T2 bit group and the encrypted T3 container (marked with a “2” in a circle). Finally, the third function is function 498.3, which corresponds to the TE5 container for encrypting the payload (marked with a “3” in a circle). In some embodiments, without nested encryption, the traversal can be performed linearly or based on an ascending TE value.



FIG. 4E illustrates an exemplary format for an encoding graph 499 with a post-order traversal, corresponding to the exemplary format for message 490 in FIG. 4C, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Similar to graph 498, graph 499 depicts containment of bit groups as left nodes and sequential ordering of bit groups as right nodes. Functions 499.1, 499.2, and 499.3 correspond to a depth-first search reverse post-order for decrypting the bit groups in their respective containers. For example, the first function performed is function 499.1, which corresponds to the TE5 container for decrypting the payload (marked with a “1” in a circle). Based on the post-order traversal, the next function is function 499.2, which corresponds to the TE2 container for decrypting the T2 bit group and the encrypted T3 container (marked with a “2” in a circle). Finally, function 499.3 is the third function and corresponds to the inner TE3 container for decrypting the T3 and T4 name components (marked with a “3” in a circle). Note that decryption is performed in the reverse order of the validation sections listed in the packet. Thus, functions 499.1-499.3 are performed in a reverse post-order which corresponds to the reverse order of the validation sections listed in FIG. 4C.


Exemplary Format for Validation Section of Selectively Encrypted CCN Messages



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary format for a validation section 500 of a selectively encrypted CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Validation section 500 can include a validation algorithm (lines 502, 506, 512, and 518) and a validation payload (lines 524 and 528). The validation algorithm section can include a nonce and a KeyId for each symmetric key used to encrypt a bit group. For example, line 502 can include a type field with a value of “T_VALALG” and a length field whose value includes the length of the fields shown in lines 506, 512, and 518. Line 506 is a TLV bit group for the KeyId and includes: a type field with a value of “T_KEYID”; a length field; and a value field of “KeyID.” Line 512 is a TLV bit group for the nonce and includes: a type field with a value of “T_NONCE”; a length field with a value of 1-8 bytes; and a value field of “Nonce(IV).” As described above, the KeyId identifies a (key, salt) pair which is created during association setup, while the nonce is 1-8 bytes in size and left-padded with 0's to 8 bytes and appended to the salt to form the GCM-AES IV.


Line 518 is a TLV bit group for the container, which is a range of encrypted container values that allows matching of keys to containers. For example, line 518 can include a type field with a value of “T_CONTAINER,” a length field with a value of “2,” and a value field that is the “TE Value” (e.g., TE2 of message 400 in FIG. 4A).


Line 524 includes a type field with a value of “T_PAYLOAD” and a length field with a value of 8, 12, or 16 bytes (as described in RFC 4106), and line 528 includes a value field that comprises an authenticator tag which is created based on the underlying AEAD scheme. For example, using AES-GCM as described above, the authenticator tag is created based on a GHASH function performed over all of the encrypted and non-encrypted data for each encrypted container.


Wrapping Solution/Method


In addition to the selective encryption of a CCN message described herein, a CCN message may also be encrypted based on a wrapping method. This method involves encapsulating an interest packet or a content object packet with a routable encapsulation name and various “wrapper” headers. To create a “wrapper” interest of an original interest, an entity creates a T_ENCAP packet, assigns an encapsulation or “wrapper” name to the wrapper interest, and places the original interest in an encrypted container after the name. The entity adds a validation section (e.g., ValidationAlg and ValidationPayload), where the ValidationAlg identifies that this specific scheme is being used and is 0-bytes of value.


To create a “wrapper” content object of an original content object, an entity creates a T_ENCAP packet, assigns the same wrapper interest name to the wrapper content object, and places the original content object in an encrypted container. The encrypted container for the original content object typically has a different TE number or encryption container indicator than the encrypted or wrapped interest. For example, if a consumer wraps the original interest in a container based on a symmetric key K1, it is likely that a responding producer wraps the responsive content object in a container based on a different symmetric key K2. Note that the consumer and the producer both possess the secret symmetric keys K1 and K2 via a key exchange protocol. Similar to wrapping the original interest, the entity that wraps the original content object adds a validation section, which includes a ValidationAlg with the (KeyID, Nonce) pair used by the encrypted container, and further includes a ValidationPayload with the authenticator tag. If there is only one encrypted container (e.g., only one TE or encrypted container), the encryptor does not need to include the TE number in the validation section. Plaintext cache control directives (or other TLVs) may be included in the T_ENCAP packet outside of the encrypted interest or content object packet.


Exemplary Apparatus and Computer System



FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary apparatus 600 that facilitates selective encryption of bit groups of a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Apparatus 600 can comprise a plurality of modules which may communicate with one another via a wired or wireless communication channel. Apparatus 600 may be realized using one or more integrated circuits, and may include fewer or more modules than those shown in FIG. 6. Further, apparatus 600 may be integrated in a computer system, or realized as a separate device which is capable of communicating with other computer systems and/or devices. Specifically, apparatus 600 can comprise a communication module 602, a block computing module 604, a bit group encrypting module 606, a bit group decrypting module 608, and a security module 610.


In some embodiments, communication module 602 can send and/or receive data packets to/from other network nodes across a computer network, such as a content centric network, where a data packet can correspond to an interest or a content object message that includes a plurality of bit groups, each corresponding to a type, a length, and a set of values, wherein one or more bit groups are marked for encryption. Block computing module 604 can compute a plurality of cipher blocks for the message based on an authenticated encryption protocol. Bit group encrypting module 606 can encrypt the one or more bit groups marked for encryption based on one or more symmetric keys, wherein the marked bit groups include one or more name components. Bit group encrypting module 606 can also indicate the encrypted bit groups as encrypted.


Communication module 602 can transmit the selectively encrypted message to a content producing device or a content requesting device. Bit group encrypting module 606 can indicate the encrypted bit groups as encrypted by setting a field associated with the bit group in the message or by setting a reserved bit associated with the bit group in the message.


Security module 610 can include in a validation section for the message a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys. Security module 610 can also include one of the following: wherein a symmetric key is exchanged via a public key operation; wherein a symmetric key is encrypted based on a public key included in the message; wherein the validation section is based on a symmetric key cryptographic system with encryption; wherein a public key identifier of the content producing device is included in the message; and wherein a short symmetric key identifier is specified for use in subsequent messages between the content requesting device and the content producing device. Security module 610 can verify the authentication information associated with the message by: looking up in a storage a key identifier associated with the message; and verifying a signature or a message authentication code based on the key identifier.


Communication module 602 can receive the selectively encrypted message. In response to verifying authentication information associated with the message (security module 610), bit group decrypting module 608 can decrypt, for each bit group indicated as encrypted, the encrypted bit group based on a corresponding symmetric key, wherein a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys are included in a validation section for the message. Bit group decrypting module 608 can indicate the decrypted bit groups as decrypted.



FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary computer system 702 that facilitates selective encryption of bit groups of a CCN message, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Computer system 702 includes a processor 704, a memory 706, and a storage device 708. Memory 706 can include a volatile memory (e.g., RAM) that serves as a managed memory, and can be used to store one or more memory pools. Furthermore, computer system 702 can be coupled to a display device 710, a keyboard 712, and a pointing device 714. Storage device 708 can store an operating system 716, a content-processing system 718, and data 730.


Content-processing system 718 can include instructions, which when executed by computer system 702, can cause computer system 702 to perform methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, content-processing system 718 may include instructions for sending and/or receiving data packets to/from other network nodes across a computer network, such as a content centric network, where a data packet can correspond to an interest or a content object message that includes a plurality of bit groups, each corresponding to a type, a length, and a set of values, wherein one or more bit groups are marked for encryption. Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for computing a plurality of cipher blocks for the message based on an authenticated encryption protocol (block computing module 722). Content-processing system 718 can also include instructions for encrypting the one or more bit groups marked for encryption based on one or more symmetric keys and for indicating the encrypted bit groups as encrypted (bit group encrypting module 724).


Content-processing system 718 can further include instructions for transmitting the selectively encrypted message to a content producing device or a content requesting device (communication module 720). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for indicating the encrypted bit groups as encrypted by setting a field associated with the bit group in the message or by setting a reserved bit associated with the bit group in the message (bit group encrypting module 724).


Content-processing system 718 can additionally include instructions for including in a validation section for the message a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys (security module 728). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for including one or more of the following: wherein a symmetric key is exchanged via a public key operation; wherein a symmetric key is encrypted based on a public key included in the message; wherein the validation section is based on a symmetric key cryptographic system with encryption; wherein a public key identifier of the content producing device is included in the message; and wherein a short symmetric key identifier is specified for use in subsequent messages between the content requesting device and the content producing device (security module 728). Content-processing system 718 can also include instructions for verifying the authentication information associated with the message by: looking up in a storage a key identifier associated with the message; and verifying a signature or a message authentication code based on the key identifier (security module 728).


Content-processing system 718 can also include instructions for receiving the selectively encrypted message (communication module 720). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for, in response to verifying authentication information associated with the message (security module 728), decrypting, for each bit group indicated as encrypted, the encrypted bit group based on a corresponding symmetric key, wherein a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys are included in a validation section for the message (bit group decrypting module 726). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for indicating the decrypted bit groups as decrypted (bit group decrypting module 726).


Data 830 can include any data that is required as input or that is generated as output by the methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, data 830 can store at least: a packet or message that corresponds to an interest or a content object; a bit group that corresponds to a type, a length, and a set of values; a name that is a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI) comprising contiguous name components ordered from a most general level to a most specific level; a message that includes a plurality of bit groups, wherein one or more bit groups are marked for encryption, and wherein the message indicates a name that is an HSVLI; a plurality of cipher blocks; an indicator of an authenticated encryption protocol; one or more symmetric keys; a key identifier or a KeyId; a nonce; a key, salt pair; Initialization Vectors; plaintext; ciphertext; associated data; an authentication tag or an authenticator; a GHASH function; an indicator of an encrypted bit group or a decrypted bit group; a field or a reserved bit associated with a bit group; an indicator of a public key operation; a public key; an indicator of a symmetric key cryptographic system with encryption; a public key identifier or a public KeyId; a short symmetric key identifier; a key storage; and a signature or a message authentication code.


The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.


The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.


Furthermore, the methods and processes described above can be included in hardware modules. For example, the hardware modules can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules are activated, the hardware modules perform the methods and processes included within the hardware modules.


The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a content requesting device configured to communicate with a content centric network (CCN) and to perform a method comprising: generating an Interest requesting a content object by a hierarchically structured variable-length name that is used to forward the Interest in the CCN, the name comprising name components arranged contiguously in an order from a most general level to a most specific level and each including a bit group comprising a type, a length, and a set of values, wherein one or more of the name components at the most specific level are marked for encryption;exchanging one or more symmetric keys via a public key operation;encrypting each name component at the most specific level marked for encryption using a respective symmetric key, to produce a selectively encrypted name having one or more encrypted name components and one or more unencrypted name components;indicating each encrypted name component as encrypted by setting a respective field associated with the bit group of the encrypted name component;including in the Interest a validation section that identifies the respective symmetric key for each encrypted name component; andtransmitting the Interest to the CCN; anda content producing device configured to receive the Interest from the CCN and responsive thereto, perform a method comprising: verifying authentication information associated with the Interest by looking up in a storage a key identifier associated with the Interest;responsive to the verifying, decrypting, for each encrypted name component indicated as encrypted, the encrypted name component based on a corresponding symmetric key, wherein a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys are included in a validation section for the Interest;indicating the decrypted name components as decrypted; andproducing a content object that matches the name components as decrypted.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: encrypting the content object using one of the symmetric keys.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the encrypting includes computing a plurality of cipher blocks for the Interest based on an authenticated encryption protocol.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein computing the cipher blocks is further based on beginning at byte zero of the Interest.
  • 5. The system of claim 3, wherein computing the cipher blocks is further based on an Advanced Encryption Standard using a key with a length of 128 bits.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein encrypting the bit groups of the name components marked for encryption is further based on an exclusive disjunction operation.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein indicating each encrypted name component further comprises: setting a reserved bit associated with the bit group of the encrypted name component.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, further comprising one or more of the following: wherein a symmetric key is encrypted based on a public key included in the Interest;wherein the validation section is based on a symmetric key cryptographic system with encryption;wherein a public key identifier of the content requesting device is included in the Interest; andwherein a symmetric key identifier is specified for use in subsequent messages between the content requesting device and the content producing device.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, further comprising one or more of the following: wherein the public key operation is based on a cryptographic system that is Rivest-Shamir-Adleman Secure Hash Algorithm 256-bit (RSA-SHA 256); andwherein the symmetric key identifier is a random number that is not derived from the symmetric key.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the Interest is configured to be forwarded to the content producing device by CCN nodes along a path of the CCN based on the name.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the content object packet is configured to be forwarded to the content requesting device along a path of the CCN in reverse to the Interest based on the name.
  • 12. A computer-implemented method comprising: at a content producing device configured to communicate with a content centric network (CCN): generating a content object packet responsive to an Interest from a content requesting device that requests a content object by a hierarchically structured variable-length name, the content object packet including the content object and the name to be used to forward the content object packet in the CCN, the name comprising name components arranged contiguously in an order from a most general level to a most specific level and each including a bit group comprising a type, a length, and a set of values, wherein one or more of the name components are marked for encryption;exchanging one or more symmetric keys via a public key operation;encrypting each name component at the most specific level marked for encryption using a respective symmetric key, to produce a selectively encrypted name having one or more encrypted name components and one or more unencrypted name components;indicating each encrypted name component as encrypted by setting a respective field associated with the bit group of the encrypted name component;including in the content object packet a validation section that identifies the respective symmetric key for each encrypted name component; andtransmitting the content object packet to the CCN; andat the content requesting device, receiving the content object packet from the CCN, and responsive thereto: verifying authentication information associated with the content object packet by looking up in a storage a key identifier associated with the content object packet, and verifying a signature or a message authentication code based on the key identifier;responsive to the verifying, decrypting, for each encrypted name component indicated as encrypted, the encrypted name component based on a corresponding symmetric key, wherein a nonce and a key identifier for each of the symmetric keys are included in the validation section for the content object packet;indicating the decrypted name components as decrypted; andbased on the decrypted name components, performing a lookup, and clearing an entry, in a Pending Interest Table (PIT) corresponding to the Interest.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the method further comprises: encrypting the content object of the content object packet using one of the symmetric keys; andstoring in the validation section an identifier of the one of the symmetric keys used to encrypt the content object.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein indicating each encrypted name component further comprises: setting a reserved bit associated with the bit group of the encrypted name component.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, further comprising one or more of the following: wherein the validation section is based on a symmetric key cryptographic system with encryption;wherein a public key identifier of the content producing device is included in the content object packet; andwherein a symmetric key identifier is specified for use in subsequent messages between the content requesting device and the content producing device.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising one or more of the following: wherein the public key operation is based on a cryptographic system that is Rivest-Shamir-Adleman Secure Hash Algorithm 256-bit (RSA-SHA 256); andwherein the symmetric key identifier is a random number that is not derived from the symmetric key.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, wherein the content object packet is configured to be forwarded to the content requesting device along a path of the CCN in reverse to the Interest based on the name.
  • 18. The method of claim 12, wherein the encrypting includes computing a plurality of cipher blocks for the content object packet based on an authenticated encryption protocol.
  • 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the encrypting includes first encrypting the one or more of the name components marked for encryption using a first symmetric key and second encrypting results of the first encrypting using a second symmetric key to produce one or more nested encryption name components.
  • 20. The system of claim 19, further comprising: encrypting the second symmetric key and storing the results in the validation section in correspondence with the one or more nested encryption name components.
  • 21. The system of claim 1, wherein the Interest is configured to be forwarded to the content producing device by CCN nodes along a path of the CCN based on the name, and the content object packet is configured to be forwarded to the content requesting device along a path of the CCN in reverse to the Interest based on the name.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the encrypting each name component at the most specific level includes encrypting at least two name components at the most specific level with at least two respective symmetric keys.
  • 23. The method of claim 12, wherein the encrypting each name component at the most specific level includes encrypting at least two name components at the most specific level with at least two respective symmetric keys.
  • 24. The method of claim 12, further comprising, at the content requesting device, when the authentication information is not verified, discarding the content object.
US Referenced Citations (629)
Number Name Date Kind
817441 Niesz Apr 1906 A
4309569 Merkle Jan 1982 A
4921898 Lenney May 1990 A
5070134 Oyamada Dec 1991 A
5110856 Oyamada May 1992 A
5214702 Fischer May 1993 A
5377354 Scannell Dec 1994 A
5440635 Bellovin Aug 1995 A
5506844 Rao Apr 1996 A
5629370 Freidzon May 1997 A
5845207 Amin Dec 1998 A
5870605 Bracho Feb 1999 A
6021464 Yao Feb 2000 A
6047331 Medard Apr 2000 A
6052683 Irwin Apr 2000 A
6085320 Kaliski, Jr. Jul 2000 A
6091724 Chandra Jul 2000 A
6128623 Mattis Oct 2000 A
6128627 Mattis Oct 2000 A
6173364 Zenchelsky Jan 2001 B1
6209003 Mattis Mar 2001 B1
6226618 Downs May 2001 B1
6233617 Rothwein May 2001 B1
6233646 Hahm May 2001 B1
6289358 Mattis Sep 2001 B1
6292880 Mattis Sep 2001 B1
6332158 Risley Dec 2001 B1
6363067 Chung Mar 2002 B1
6366988 Skiba Apr 2002 B1
6957228 Horvitz Mar 2003 B1
6574377 Cahill Jun 2003 B1
6654792 Verma Nov 2003 B1
6667957 Corson Dec 2003 B1
6681220 Kaplan Jan 2004 B1
6681326 Son Jan 2004 B2
6732273 Byers May 2004 B1
6769066 Botros Jul 2004 B1
6772333 Brendel Aug 2004 B1
6775258 vanVanvalkenburg Aug 2004 B1
6834272 Naor Dec 2004 B1
6862280 Bertagna Mar 2005 B1
6901452 Bertagna May 2005 B1
6915307 Mattis Jul 2005 B1
6917985 Madruga Jul 2005 B2
6968393 Chen Nov 2005 B1
6981029 Menditto Dec 2005 B1
7007024 Zelenka Feb 2006 B2
7013389 Srivastava Mar 2006 B1
7031308 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Apr 2006 B2
7043637 Bolosky May 2006 B2
7061877 Gummalla Jun 2006 B1
7080073 Jiang Jul 2006 B1
RE39360 Aziz Oct 2006 E
7149750 Chadwick Dec 2006 B2
7152094 Jannu Dec 2006 B1
7177646 ONeill Feb 2007 B2
7181620 Hur Feb 2007 B1
7206860 Murakami Apr 2007 B2
7206861 Callon Apr 2007 B1
7210326 Kawamoto May 2007 B2
7233948 Shamoon Jun 2007 B1
7246159 Aggarwal Jul 2007 B2
7257837 Xu Aug 2007 B2
7287275 Moskowitz Oct 2007 B2
7315541 Housel Jan 2008 B1
7339929 Zelig Mar 2008 B2
7350229 Lander Mar 2008 B1
7362727 ONeill Apr 2008 B1
7382787 Barnes Jun 2008 B1
7395507 Robarts Jul 2008 B2
7430755 Hughes Sep 2008 B1
7444251 Nikovski Oct 2008 B2
7466703 Arunachalam Dec 2008 B1
7472422 Agbabian Dec 2008 B1
7496668 Hawkinson Feb 2009 B2
7509425 Rosenberg Mar 2009 B1
7523016 Surdulescu Apr 2009 B1
7535926 Deshpande May 2009 B1
7542471 Samuels Jun 2009 B2
7543064 Juncker Jun 2009 B2
7552233 Raju Jun 2009 B2
7555482 Korkus Jun 2009 B2
7555563 Ott Jun 2009 B2
7564812 Elliott Jul 2009 B1
7567547 Mosko Jul 2009 B2
7567946 Andreoli Jul 2009 B2
7580971 Gollapudi Aug 2009 B1
7623535 Guichard Nov 2009 B2
7636767 Lev-Ran Dec 2009 B2
7647507 Feng Jan 2010 B1
7660324 Oguchi Feb 2010 B2
7685290 Satapati Mar 2010 B2
7698463 Ogier Apr 2010 B2
7698559 Chaudhury Apr 2010 B1
7769887 Bhattacharyya Aug 2010 B1
7779467 Choi Aug 2010 B2
7801069 Cheung Sep 2010 B2
7801177 Luss Sep 2010 B2
7816441 Elizalde Oct 2010 B2
7831733 Sultan Nov 2010 B2
7873619 Faibish Jan 2011 B1
7908337 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Mar 2011 B2
7924837 Shabtay Apr 2011 B1
7953014 Toda May 2011 B2
7953885 Devireddy May 2011 B1
7979912 Roka Jul 2011 B1
8000267 Solis Aug 2011 B2
8010691 Kollmansberger Aug 2011 B2
8069023 Frailong Nov 2011 B1
8074289 Carpentier Dec 2011 B1
8117441 Kurien Feb 2012 B2
8160069 Jacobson Apr 2012 B2
8204060 Jacobson Jun 2012 B2
8214364 Bigus Jul 2012 B2
8224985 Takeda Jul 2012 B2
8225057 Zheng Jul 2012 B1
8239331 Shanmugavelayutham Aug 2012 B2
8271578 Sheffi Sep 2012 B2
8271687 Turner Sep 2012 B2
8312064 Gauvin Nov 2012 B1
8332357 Chung Dec 2012 B1
8375420 Farrell Feb 2013 B2
8386622 Jacobson Feb 2013 B2
8447851 Anderson May 2013 B1
8462781 McGhee Jun 2013 B2
8467297 Liu Jun 2013 B2
8473633 Eardley Jun 2013 B2
8553562 Allan Oct 2013 B2
8572214 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Oct 2013 B2
8654649 Vasseur Feb 2014 B2
8665757 Kling Mar 2014 B2
8667172 Ravindran Mar 2014 B2
8677451 Bhimaraju Mar 2014 B1
8688619 Ezick Apr 2014 B1
8699350 Kumar Apr 2014 B1
8718055 Vasseur May 2014 B2
8750820 Allan Jun 2014 B2
8761022 Chiabaut Jun 2014 B2
8762477 Xie Jun 2014 B2
8762570 Qian Jun 2014 B2
8762707 Killian Jun 2014 B2
8767627 Ezure Jul 2014 B2
8817594 Gero Aug 2014 B2
8826381 Kim Sep 2014 B2
8832302 Bradford Sep 2014 B1
8836536 Marwah Sep 2014 B2
8861356 Kozat Oct 2014 B2
8862774 Vasseur Oct 2014 B2
8868779 ONeill Oct 2014 B2
8874842 Kimmel Oct 2014 B1
8880682 Bishop Nov 2014 B2
8903756 Zhao Dec 2014 B2
8923293 Jacobson Dec 2014 B2
8934496 Vasseur Jan 2015 B2
8937865 Kumar Jan 2015 B1
8972969 Gaither Mar 2015 B2
8977596 Montulli Mar 2015 B2
9002921 Westphal Apr 2015 B2
9015468 Wang Apr 2015 B2
9032095 Traina May 2015 B1
9071498 Beser Jun 2015 B2
9112895 Lin Aug 2015 B1
9137152 Xie Sep 2015 B2
9253087 Zhang Feb 2016 B2
9270598 Oran Feb 2016 B1
9280610 Gruber Mar 2016 B2
9401899 Wang Jul 2016 B2
9590887 Mahadevan Mar 2017 B2
9596323 Luby Mar 2017 B2
20020002680 Carbajal Jan 2002 A1
20020010795 Brown Jan 2002 A1
20020038296 Margolus Mar 2002 A1
20020048269 Hong Apr 2002 A1
20020054593 Morohashi May 2002 A1
20020077988 Sasaki Jun 2002 A1
20020078066 Robinson Jun 2002 A1
20020138551 Erickson Sep 2002 A1
20020152305 Jackson Oct 2002 A1
20020176404 Girard Nov 2002 A1
20020188605 Adya Dec 2002 A1
20020199014 Yang Dec 2002 A1
20030004621 Bousquet Jan 2003 A1
20030009365 Tynan Jan 2003 A1
20030033394 Stine Feb 2003 A1
20030046396 Richter Mar 2003 A1
20030046421 Horvitz et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046437 Eytchison Mar 2003 A1
20030048793 Pochon Mar 2003 A1
20030051100 Patel Mar 2003 A1
20030061384 Nakatani Mar 2003 A1
20030074472 Lucco Apr 2003 A1
20030088696 McCanne May 2003 A1
20030097447 Johnston May 2003 A1
20030099237 Mitra May 2003 A1
20030140257 Peterka Jul 2003 A1
20030229892 Sardera Dec 2003 A1
20040024879 Dingman Feb 2004 A1
20040030602 Rosenquist Feb 2004 A1
20040039906 Oka Feb 2004 A1
20040064737 Milliken Apr 2004 A1
20040071140 Jason Apr 2004 A1
20040073617 Milliken Apr 2004 A1
20040073715 Folkes Apr 2004 A1
20040139230 Kim Jul 2004 A1
20040196783 Shinomiya Oct 2004 A1
20040218548 Kennedy Nov 2004 A1
20040221047 Grover Nov 2004 A1
20040225627 Botros Nov 2004 A1
20040233916 Takeuchi Nov 2004 A1
20040246902 Weinstein Dec 2004 A1
20040252683 Kennedy Dec 2004 A1
20040267902 Yang Dec 2004 A1
20050003832 Osafune Jan 2005 A1
20050013440 Akiyama Jan 2005 A1
20050028156 Hammond Feb 2005 A1
20050043060 Brandenberg Feb 2005 A1
20050050211 Kaul Mar 2005 A1
20050066121 Keeler Mar 2005 A1
20050074001 Mattes Apr 2005 A1
20050132207 Mourad Jun 2005 A1
20050149508 Deshpande Jul 2005 A1
20050159823 Hayes Jul 2005 A1
20050198351 Nog Sep 2005 A1
20050249196 Ansari Nov 2005 A1
20050259637 Chu Nov 2005 A1
20050262217 Nonaka Nov 2005 A1
20050281288 Banerjee Dec 2005 A1
20050286535 Shrum Dec 2005 A1
20050289222 Sahim Dec 2005 A1
20060010249 Sabesan Jan 2006 A1
20060029102 Abe Feb 2006 A1
20060039379 Abe Feb 2006 A1
20060051055 Ohkawa Mar 2006 A1
20060072523 Richardson Apr 2006 A1
20060099973 Nair May 2006 A1
20060129514 Watanabe Jun 2006 A1
20060129811 Fiske Jun 2006 A1
20060133343 Huang Jun 2006 A1
20060146686 Kim Jul 2006 A1
20060173831 Basso Aug 2006 A1
20060193295 White Aug 2006 A1
20060203804 Whitmore Sep 2006 A1
20060206445 Andreoli Sep 2006 A1
20060215684 Capone Sep 2006 A1
20060223504 Ishak Oct 2006 A1
20060242155 Moore Oct 2006 A1
20060256767 Suzuki Nov 2006 A1
20060268792 Belcea Nov 2006 A1
20060288237 Goodwill Dec 2006 A1
20070019619 Foster Jan 2007 A1
20070033397 Phillips, II Feb 2007 A1
20070073888 Madhok Mar 2007 A1
20070094265 Korkus Apr 2007 A1
20070101123 Kollmyer May 2007 A1
20070112880 Yang May 2007 A1
20070124412 Narayanaswami May 2007 A1
20070127457 Mirtorabi Jun 2007 A1
20070156998 Gorobets Jul 2007 A1
20070160062 Morishita Jul 2007 A1
20070162394 Zager Jul 2007 A1
20070171828 Dalal Jul 2007 A1
20070189284 Kecskemeti Aug 2007 A1
20070195765 Heissenbuttel Aug 2007 A1
20070198838 Nonaka Aug 2007 A1
20070204011 Shaver Aug 2007 A1
20070209067 Fogel Sep 2007 A1
20070239892 Ott Oct 2007 A1
20070240207 Belakhdar Oct 2007 A1
20070245034 Retana Oct 2007 A1
20070253418 Shiri Nov 2007 A1
20070255677 Alexander Nov 2007 A1
20070255699 Sreenivas Nov 2007 A1
20070255781 Li Nov 2007 A1
20070274504 Maes Nov 2007 A1
20070275701 Jonker Nov 2007 A1
20070276907 Maes Nov 2007 A1
20070283158 Danseglio Dec 2007 A1
20070294187 Scherrer Dec 2007 A1
20080005056 Stelzig Jan 2008 A1
20080005223 Flake Jan 2008 A1
20080005262 Wurzburg Jan 2008 A1
20080010366 Duggan Jan 2008 A1
20080037420 Tang Feb 2008 A1
20080043989 Furutono Feb 2008 A1
20080046340 Brown Feb 2008 A1
20080059631 Bergstrom Mar 2008 A1
20080080440 Yarvis Apr 2008 A1
20080082662 Dandliker Apr 2008 A1
20080095159 Suzuki Apr 2008 A1
20080101357 Iovanna May 2008 A1
20080107034 Jetcheva May 2008 A1
20080107259 Satou May 2008 A1
20080123862 Rowley May 2008 A1
20080133583 Artan Jun 2008 A1
20080133755 Pollack Jun 2008 A1
20080151755 Nishioka Jun 2008 A1
20080159271 Kutt Jul 2008 A1
20080165775 Das Jul 2008 A1
20080186901 Itagaki Aug 2008 A1
20080200153 Fitzpatrick Aug 2008 A1
20080215669 Gaddy Sep 2008 A1
20080216086 Tanaka Sep 2008 A1
20080243992 Jardetzky Oct 2008 A1
20080250006 Dettinger Oct 2008 A1
20080256138 Sim-Tang Oct 2008 A1
20080256359 Kahn Oct 2008 A1
20080270618 Rosenberg Oct 2008 A1
20080271143 Stephens Oct 2008 A1
20080287142 Keighran Nov 2008 A1
20080288580 Wang Nov 2008 A1
20080291923 Back Nov 2008 A1
20080298376 Takeda Dec 2008 A1
20080320148 Capuozzo Dec 2008 A1
20090006659 Collins Jan 2009 A1
20090013324 Gobara Jan 2009 A1
20090022154 Kiribe Jan 2009 A1
20090024641 Quigley Jan 2009 A1
20090030978 Johnson Jan 2009 A1
20090037763 Adhya Feb 2009 A1
20090052660 Chen Feb 2009 A1
20090067429 Nagai Mar 2009 A1
20090077184 Brewer Mar 2009 A1
20090092043 Lapuh Apr 2009 A1
20090097631 Gisby Apr 2009 A1
20090103515 Pointer Apr 2009 A1
20090113068 Fujihira Apr 2009 A1
20090116393 Hughes May 2009 A1
20090117922 Bell May 2009 A1
20090132662 Sheridan May 2009 A1
20090135728 Shen May 2009 A1
20090144300 Chatley Jun 2009 A1
20090157887 Froment Jun 2009 A1
20090185745 Momosaki Jul 2009 A1
20090193101 Munetsugu Jul 2009 A1
20090198832 Shah Aug 2009 A1
20090222344 Greene Sep 2009 A1
20090228593 Takeda Sep 2009 A1
20090254572 Redlich Oct 2009 A1
20090268905 Matsushima Oct 2009 A1
20090274158 Sharp Nov 2009 A1
20090276396 Gorman Nov 2009 A1
20090285209 Stewart Nov 2009 A1
20090287835 Jacobson Nov 2009 A1
20090287853 Carson Nov 2009 A1
20090288076 Johnson Nov 2009 A1
20090288143 Stebila Nov 2009 A1
20090288163 Jacobson Nov 2009 A1
20090292743 Bigus Nov 2009 A1
20090293121 Bigus Nov 2009 A1
20090296719 Maier Dec 2009 A1
20090300079 Shitomi Dec 2009 A1
20090300407 Kamath Dec 2009 A1
20090300512 Ahn Dec 2009 A1
20090307286 Laffin Dec 2009 A1
20090307333 Welingkar Dec 2009 A1
20090323632 Nix Dec 2009 A1
20100005061 Basco Jan 2010 A1
20100027539 Beverly Feb 2010 A1
20100046546 Ram Feb 2010 A1
20100057929 Merat Mar 2010 A1
20100058346 Narang Mar 2010 A1
20100088370 Wu Apr 2010 A1
20100094767 Miltonberger Apr 2010 A1
20100094876 Huang Apr 2010 A1
20100098093 Ejzak Apr 2010 A1
20100100465 Cooke Apr 2010 A1
20100103870 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Apr 2010 A1
20100122326 Bisbee May 2010 A1
20100124191 Vos May 2010 A1
20100125911 Bhaskaran May 2010 A1
20100131660 Dec May 2010 A1
20100150155 Napierala Jun 2010 A1
20100165976 Khan Jul 2010 A1
20100169478 Saha Jul 2010 A1
20100169503 Kollmansberger Jul 2010 A1
20100180332 Ben-Yochanan Jul 2010 A1
20100182995 Hwang Jul 2010 A1
20100185753 Liu Jul 2010 A1
20100195653 Jacobson Aug 2010 A1
20100195654 Jacobson Aug 2010 A1
20100195655 Jacobson Aug 2010 A1
20100217874 Anantharaman Aug 2010 A1
20100217985 Fahrny Aug 2010 A1
20100232402 Przybysz Sep 2010 A1
20100232439 Dham Sep 2010 A1
20100235516 Nakamura Sep 2010 A1
20100246549 Zhang Sep 2010 A1
20100250497 Redlich Sep 2010 A1
20100250939 Adams Sep 2010 A1
20100257149 Cognigni Oct 2010 A1
20100268782 Zombek Oct 2010 A1
20100272107 Papp Oct 2010 A1
20100281263 Ugawa Nov 2010 A1
20100284309 Allan Nov 2010 A1
20100284404 Gopinath Nov 2010 A1
20100293293 Beser Nov 2010 A1
20100316052 Petersen Dec 2010 A1
20100322249 Thathapudi Dec 2010 A1
20100332595 Fullagar Dec 2010 A1
20110013637 Xue Jan 2011 A1
20110019674 Iovanna Jan 2011 A1
20110022812 vanderLinden Jan 2011 A1
20110029952 Harrington Feb 2011 A1
20110055392 Shen Mar 2011 A1
20110055921 Narayanaswamy Mar 2011 A1
20110060716 Forman Mar 2011 A1
20110060717 Forman Mar 2011 A1
20110090908 Jacobson Apr 2011 A1
20110106755 Hao May 2011 A1
20110131308 Eriksson Jun 2011 A1
20110137919 Ryu Jun 2011 A1
20110145597 Yamaguchi Jun 2011 A1
20110145858 Philpott Jun 2011 A1
20110149858 Hwang Jun 2011 A1
20110153840 Narayana Jun 2011 A1
20110158122 Murphy Jun 2011 A1
20110161408 Kim Jun 2011 A1
20110202609 Chaturvedi Aug 2011 A1
20110219093 Ragunathan Sep 2011 A1
20110219427 Hito Sep 2011 A1
20110219727 May Sep 2011 A1
20110225293 Rathod Sep 2011 A1
20110231578 Nagappan Sep 2011 A1
20110239256 Gholmieh Sep 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer Oct 2011 A1
20110264824 Subramanian Oct 2011 A1
20110265159 Ronda Oct 2011 A1
20110265174 Thornton Oct 2011 A1
20110271007 Wang Nov 2011 A1
20110280214 Lee Nov 2011 A1
20110286457 Ee Nov 2011 A1
20110286459 Rembarz Nov 2011 A1
20110295783 Zhao Dec 2011 A1
20110299454 Krishnaswamy Dec 2011 A1
20120011170 Elad Jan 2012 A1
20120011551 Levy Jan 2012 A1
20120023113 Ferren Jan 2012 A1
20120036180 Thornton Feb 2012 A1
20120039469 Mueller Feb 2012 A1
20120045064 Rembarz Feb 2012 A1
20120047361 Erdmann Feb 2012 A1
20120066727 Nozoe Mar 2012 A1
20120079056 Turanyi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120079281 Lowenstein Mar 2012 A1
20120102136 Srebrny Apr 2012 A1
20120106339 Mishra May 2012 A1
20120110159 Richardson May 2012 A1
20120114313 Phillips May 2012 A1
20120120803 Farkas May 2012 A1
20120127994 Ko May 2012 A1
20120136676 Goodall May 2012 A1
20120136936 Quintuna May 2012 A1
20120136945 Lee May 2012 A1
20120137367 Dupont May 2012 A1
20120141093 Yamaguchi Jun 2012 A1
20120155464 Kim Jun 2012 A1
20120158973 Jacobson Jun 2012 A1
20120163373 Lo Jun 2012 A1
20120166433 Tseng Jun 2012 A1
20120170913 Isozaki Jul 2012 A1
20120179653 Araki Jul 2012 A1
20120197690 Agulnek Aug 2012 A1
20120198048 Ioffe Aug 2012 A1
20120221150 Arensmeier Aug 2012 A1
20120224487 Hui Sep 2012 A1
20120226902 Kim Sep 2012 A1
20120257500 Lynch Oct 2012 A1
20120284791 Miller Nov 2012 A1
20120290669 Parks Nov 2012 A1
20120290919 Melnyk Nov 2012 A1
20120291102 Cohen Nov 2012 A1
20120300669 Zahavi Nov 2012 A1
20120307629 Vasseur Dec 2012 A1
20120314580 Hong Dec 2012 A1
20120317307 Ravindran Dec 2012 A1
20120317655 Zhang Dec 2012 A1
20120322422 Frecks Dec 2012 A1
20120323933 He Dec 2012 A1
20120331112 Chatani Dec 2012 A1
20130024560 Vasseur Jan 2013 A1
20130041982 Shi Feb 2013 A1
20130051392 Filsfils Feb 2013 A1
20130054971 Yamaguchi Feb 2013 A1
20130060962 Wang Mar 2013 A1
20130061084 Barton Mar 2013 A1
20130064368 Lefebvre Mar 2013 A1
20130066823 Sweeney Mar 2013 A1
20130073552 Rangwala Mar 2013 A1
20130073882 Inbaraj Mar 2013 A1
20130074155 Huh Mar 2013 A1
20130090942 Robinson Apr 2013 A1
20130091237 Ambalavanar Apr 2013 A1
20130091539 Khurana Apr 2013 A1
20130108039 Gong May 2013 A1
20130110987 Kim May 2013 A1
20130111063 Lee May 2013 A1
20130128786 Sultan May 2013 A1
20130132719 Kobayashi May 2013 A1
20130139245 Thomas May 2013 A1
20130151584 Westphal Jun 2013 A1
20130151646 Chidambaram Jun 2013 A1
20130152070 Bhullar Jun 2013 A1
20130163426 Beliveau Jun 2013 A1
20130166668 Byun Jun 2013 A1
20130173822 Hong Jul 2013 A1
20130182568 Lee Jul 2013 A1
20130182931 Fan Jul 2013 A1
20130185406 Choi Jul 2013 A1
20130191412 Kitamura Jul 2013 A1
20130197698 Shah Aug 2013 A1
20130198119 Eberhardt, III Aug 2013 A1
20130212185 Pasquero Aug 2013 A1
20130219038 Lee Aug 2013 A1
20130219081 Qian Aug 2013 A1
20130219478 Mahamuni Aug 2013 A1
20130223237 Hui Aug 2013 A1
20130227048 Xie Aug 2013 A1
20130227114 Vasseur Aug 2013 A1
20130227166 Ravindran Aug 2013 A1
20130242996 Varvello Sep 2013 A1
20130250809 Hui Sep 2013 A1
20130262365 Dolbear Oct 2013 A1
20130262698 Schwan Oct 2013 A1
20130275544 Westphal Oct 2013 A1
20130282854 Jang Oct 2013 A1
20130282860 Zhang Oct 2013 A1
20130282920 Zhang Oct 2013 A1
20130304758 Gruber Nov 2013 A1
20130304937 Lee Nov 2013 A1
20130325888 Oneppo Dec 2013 A1
20130329696 Xu Dec 2013 A1
20130332971 Fisher Dec 2013 A1
20130336103 Vasseur Dec 2013 A1
20130336323 Srinivasan Dec 2013 A1
20130339481 Hong Dec 2013 A1
20130343408 Cook Dec 2013 A1
20140003232 Guichard Jan 2014 A1
20140003424 Matsuhira Jan 2014 A1
20140006354 Parkison Jan 2014 A1
20140006565 Muscariello Jan 2014 A1
20140029445 Hui Jan 2014 A1
20140032714 Liu Jan 2014 A1
20140033193 Palaniappan Jan 2014 A1
20140040505 Barton Feb 2014 A1
20140040628 Fort Feb 2014 A1
20140043987 Watve Feb 2014 A1
20140047513 vantNoordende Feb 2014 A1
20140074730 Arensmeier Mar 2014 A1
20140075567 Raleigh Mar 2014 A1
20140082135 Jung Mar 2014 A1
20140082661 Krahnstoever Mar 2014 A1
20140089454 Jeon Mar 2014 A1
20140096249 Dupont Apr 2014 A1
20140098685 Shattil Apr 2014 A1
20140108313 Heidasch Apr 2014 A1
20140108474 David Apr 2014 A1
20140115037 Liu Apr 2014 A1
20140122587 Petker et al. May 2014 A1
20140129736 Yu May 2014 A1
20140136814 Stark May 2014 A1
20140140348 Perlman May 2014 A1
20140143370 Vilenski May 2014 A1
20140146819 Bae May 2014 A1
20140149733 Kim May 2014 A1
20140156396 deKozan Jun 2014 A1
20140165207 Engel Jun 2014 A1
20140172783 Suzuki Jun 2014 A1
20140172981 Kim Jun 2014 A1
20140173034 Liu Jun 2014 A1
20140173076 Ravindran Jun 2014 A1
20140181140 Kim Jun 2014 A1
20140192677 Chew Jul 2014 A1
20140192717 Liu Jul 2014 A1
20140195328 Ferens Jul 2014 A1
20140195641 Wang Jul 2014 A1
20140195666 Dumitriu Jul 2014 A1
20140204945 Byun Jul 2014 A1
20140214942 Ozonat Jul 2014 A1
20140233575 Xie Aug 2014 A1
20140237085 Park Aug 2014 A1
20140237095 Bevilacqua-Linn Aug 2014 A1
20140245359 DeFoy Aug 2014 A1
20140254595 Luo Sep 2014 A1
20140280823 Varvello Sep 2014 A1
20140281489 Peterka Sep 2014 A1
20140281505 Zhang Sep 2014 A1
20140282816 Xie Sep 2014 A1
20140289325 Solis Sep 2014 A1
20140289790 Wilson Sep 2014 A1
20140298248 Kang Oct 2014 A1
20140314093 You Oct 2014 A1
20140337276 Iordanov Nov 2014 A1
20140365550 Jang Dec 2014 A1
20150006896 Franck Jan 2015 A1
20150018770 Baran Jan 2015 A1
20150032892 Narayanan Jan 2015 A1
20150033365 Mellor Jan 2015 A1
20150039890 Khosravi Feb 2015 A1
20150063802 Bahadur Mar 2015 A1
20150089081 Thubert Mar 2015 A1
20150095481 Ohnishi Apr 2015 A1
20150095483 Muramoto Apr 2015 A1
20150095514 Yu Apr 2015 A1
20150120663 LeScouarnec Apr 2015 A1
20150169758 Assom Jun 2015 A1
20150188770 Naiksatam Jul 2015 A1
20150195149 Vasseur Jul 2015 A1
20150207633 Ravindran Jul 2015 A1
20150207864 Wilson Jul 2015 A1
20150222424 Mosko Aug 2015 A1
20150222435 Lea Aug 2015 A1
20150279348 Cao Oct 2015 A1
20150288755 Mosko Oct 2015 A1
20150312300 Mosko Oct 2015 A1
20150349961 Mosko Dec 2015 A1
20150372903 Hui Dec 2015 A1
20150381546 Mahadevan Dec 2015 A1
20160019275 Mosko Jan 2016 A1
20160021172 Mahadevan Jan 2016 A1
20160062840 Scott Mar 2016 A1
20160080327 Yoneda Mar 2016 A1
20160105279 Zheng Apr 2016 A1
20160110466 Uzun Apr 2016 A1
20160171184 Solis Jun 2016 A1
20160182228 Smith Jun 2016 A1
20160255180 Bae Sep 2016 A1
20160359822 Rivera Dec 2016 A1
20170085441 Azgin Mar 2017 A1
20170111330 Mosko Apr 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
103873371 Jun 2014 CN
1720277 Jun 1967 DE
19620817 Nov 1997 DE
0295727 Dec 1988 EP
0757065 Jul 1996 EP
1077422 Feb 2001 EP
1383265 Jan 2004 EP
1384729 Jan 2004 EP
1473889 Nov 2004 EP
2120402 Nov 2009 EP
2120419 Nov 2009 EP
2120419 Nov 2009 EP
2124415 Nov 2009 EP
2214357 Aug 2010 EP
2299754 Mar 2011 EP
2323346 May 2011 EP
2552083 Jan 2013 EP
2928149 Oct 2015 EP
2214356 May 2016 EP
03005288 Jan 2003 WO
03042254 May 2003 WO
03049369 Jun 2003 WO
03091297 Nov 2003 WO
2005041527 May 2005 WO
2007113180 Oct 2007 WO
2007122620 Nov 2007 WO
2007144388 Dec 2007 WO
2011049890 Apr 2011 WO
2012077073 Jun 2012 WO
2013123410 Aug 2013 WO
2014023072 Feb 2014 WO
2015084327 Jun 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (177)
Entry
Liu, Hang—A TLV-Structured Data Naming Scheme for Content Oriented Networking. Published in: Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on Jun. 10-15, 2012. Date Added to IEEE Xplore: Nov. 29, 2012.
Jacobson, Van et al., “Content-Centric Networking, Whitepaper Describing Future Assurable Global Networks”, Palo Alto Research Center, Inc., Jan. 30, 2007, pp. 1-9.
Koponen, Teemu et al., “A Data-Oriented (and Beyond) Network Architecture”, SIGCOMM '07, Aug. 27-31, 2007, Kyoto, Japan, XP-002579021, p. 181-192.
Ao-Jan Su, David R. Choffnes, Aleksandar Kuzmanovic, and Fabian E. Bustamante. Drafting Behind Akamai: Inferring Network Conditions Based on CDN Redirections. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (Feb. 2009).
“PBC Library-Pairing-Based Cryptography-About,” http://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc. downloaded Apr. 27, 2015.
C. Gentry and A. Silverberg. Hierarchical ID-Based Cryptography. Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2002. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2002).
Boneh et al., “Collusion Resistant Broadcast Encryption With Short Ciphertexts and Private Keys”, 2005.
D. Boneh and M. Franklin. Identity-Based Encryption from the Weil Pairing. Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO 2001, vol. 2139, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2001).
Anteniese et al., “Improved Proxy Re-Encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage”, 2006.
Xiong et al., “CloudSeal: End-to-End Content Protection in Cloud-based Storage and Delivery Services”, 2012.
J. Bethencourt, A, Sahai, and B. Waters, ‘Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption,’ in Proc. IEEE Security & Privacy 2007, Berkeley, CA, USA, May 2007, pp. 321-334.
J. Lotspiech, S. Nusser, and F. Pestoni. Anonymous Trust: Digit.
J. Shao and Z. Cao. CCA-Secure Proxy Re-Encryption without Pairings. Public Key Cryptography. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5443 (2009).
Gopal et al. “Integrating content-based Mechanisms with hierarchical File systems”, Feb. 1999, University of Arizona, 15 pages.
R. H. Deng, J. Weng, S. Liu, and K. Chen. Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-Encryption without Pairings. CANS. Spring Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5339 (2008).
RTMP (2009). Available online at http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/rtmp/ pdf/rtmp specification 1.0.pdf.
S. Chow, J. Weng, Y. Yang, and R. Deng. Efficient Unidirectional Proxy Re-Encryption. Progress in Cryptology—AFRICACRYPT 2010. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2010).
S. Kamara and K. Lauter. Cryptographic Cloud Storage. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2010).
Sandvine, Global Internet Phenomena Report—Spring 2012. Located online at http://www.sandvine.com/downloads/ documents/Phenomenal H 2012/Sandvine Global Internet Phenomena Report 1H 2012.pdf.
The Despotify Project (2012). Available online at http://despotify.sourceforge.net/.
V. K. Adhikari, S. Jain, Y. Chen, and Z.-L. Zhang. Vivisecting Youtube:An Active Measurement Study. In INFOCOM12 Mini-conference (2012).
Vijay Kumar Adhikari, Yang Guo, Fang Hao, Matteo Varvello, Volker Hilt, Moritz Steiner, and Zhi-Li Zhang. Unreeling Netflix: Understanding and Improving Multi-CDN Movie Delivery. In the Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2012 (2012).
Jacobson, Van et al. ‘VoCCN: Voice Over Content-Centric Networks.’ Dec. 1, 2009. ACM ReArch'09.
Rosenberg, J. “Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols”, Apr. 2010, pp. 1-117.
Shih, Eugene et al., ‘Wake on Wireless: An Event Driven Energy Saving Strategy for Battery Operated Devices’, Sep. 23, 2002, pp. 160-171.
Fall, K. et al., “DTN: an architectural retrospective”, Selected areas in communications, IEEE Journal on, vol. 28, No. 5, Jun. 1, 2008, pp. 828-835.
Gritter, M. et al., ‘An Architecture for content routing support in the Internet’, Proceedings of 3rd Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, 2001, pp. 37-48.
“CCNx,” http://ccnx.org/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“Content Delivery Network”, Wikipedia, Dec. 10, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Content_delivery_network&oldid=465077460.
“Digital Signature” archived on Aug. 31, 2009 at http://web.archive.org/web/20090831170721/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature.
“Introducing JSON,” http://www.json.org/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“Microsoft PlayReady,” http://www.microsoft.com/playready/.downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“Pursuing a pub/sub internet (PURSUIT),” http://www.fp7-pursuit.ew/PursuitWeb/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“The FP7 4WARD project,” http://www.4ward-project.eu/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
A. Broder and A. Karlin, “Multilevel Adaptive Hashing”, Jan. 1990, pp. 43-53.
Detti, Andrea, et al. “CONET: a content centric inter-networking architecture.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2011.
A. Wolman, M. Voelker, N. Sharma N. Cardwell, A. Karlin, and H.M. Levy, “On the scale and performance of cooperative web proxy caching,” ACM SIGHOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 16-31, Dec. 1999.
Afanasyev, Alexander, et al. “Interest flooding attack and countermeasures in Named Data Networking.” IFIP Networking Conference, 2013. IEEE, 2013.
B. Ahlgren et al., ‘A Survey of Information-centric Networking’ IEEE Commun. Magazine, Jul. 2012, pp. 26-36.
Bari, MdFaizul, et al. ‘A survey of naming and routing in information-centric networks.’ Communications Magazine, IEEE 50.12 (2012): 44-53.
Baugher, Mark et al., “Self-Verifying Names for Read-Only Named Data”, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Mar. 2012, pp. 274-279.
Brambley, Michael, A novel, low-cost, reduced-sensor approach for providing smart remote monitoring and diagnostics for packaged air conditioners and heat pumps. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2009.
C.A. Wood and E. Uzun, “Flexible end-to-end content security in CCN,” in Proc. IEEE CCNC 2014, Las Vegas, CA, USA, Jan. 2014.
Carzaniga, Antonio, Matthew J. Rutherford, and Alexander L. Wolf. ‘A routing scheme for content-based networking.’ INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. vol. 2. IEEE, 2004.
Cho, Jin-Hee, Ananthram Swami, and Ray Chen. “A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 13.4 (2011): 562-583.
Compagno, Alberto, et al. “Poseidon: Mitigating interest flooding DDoS attacks in named data networking.” Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2013 IEEE 38th Conference on. IEEE, 2013.
Conner, William, et al. “A trust management framework for service-oriented environments.” Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 2009.
Content Centric Networking Project (CCN) [online], http://ccnx.org/releases/latest/doc/technical/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Content Mediator Architecture for Content-aware Networks (COMET) Project [online], http://www.comet-project.org/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
D.K. Smetters, P. Golle, and J.D. Thornton, “CCNx access control specifications,” PARC, Tech. Rep., Jul. 2010.
Dabirmoghaddam, Ali, Maziar Mirzazad Barijough, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. ‘Understanding optimal caching and opportunistic caching at the edge of information-centric networks.’ Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2014.
Detti et al., “Supporting the Web with an information centric network that routes by name”, Aug. 2012, Computer Networks 56, pp. 3705-3702.
Dijkstra, Edsger W., and Carel S. Scholten. ‘Termination detection for diffusing computations.’ Information Processing Letters 11.1 (1980): 1-4.
Dijkstra, Edsger W., Wim HJ Feijen, and A_J M. Van Gasteren. “Derivation of a termination detection algorithm for distributed computations.” Control Flow and Data Flow: concepts of distributed programming. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986. 507-512.
E. Rescorla and N. Modadugu, “Datagram transport layer security,” IETF RFC 4347, Apr. 2006.
E.W. Dijkstra, W. Feijen, and A.J.M. Van Gasteren, “Derivation of a Termination Detection Algorithm for Distributed Computations,” Information Processing Letter, vol. 16, No. 5, 1983.
Fayazbakhsh, S. K., Lin, Y., Tootoonchian, A., Ghodsi, A., Koponen, T., Maggs, B., & Shenker, S. (Aug. 2013). Less pain, most of the gain: Incrementally deployable ICN. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 147-158). ACM.
G. Tyson, S. Kaune, S. Miles, Y. El-Khatib, A. Mauthe, and A. Taweel, “A trace-driven analysis of caching in content-centric networks,” in Proc. IEEE ICCCN 2012, Munich, Germany, Jul.-Aug. 2012, pp. 1-7.
G. Wang, Q. Liu, and J. Wu, “Hierarchical attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control in cloud storage services,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2010, Chicago, IL, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737.
G. Xylomenos et al., “A Survey of Information-centric Networking Research,” IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials, Jul. 2013.
Garcia, Humberto E., Wen-Chiao Lin, and Semyon M. Meerkov. “A resilient condition assessment monitoring system.” Resilient Control Systems (ISRCS), 2012 5th International Symposium on. IEEE, 2012.
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Jose J. ‘A unified approach to loop-free routing using distance vectors or link states.’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 19. No. 4. ACM, 1989.
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Jose J. ‘Name-Based Content Routing in Information Centric Networks Using Distance Information’ Proc ACM ICN 2014, Sep. 2014.
Ghali, Cesar, GeneTsudik, and Ersin Uzun. “Needle in a Haystack: Mitigating Content Poisoning in Named-Data Networking.” Proceedings of NDSS Workshop on Security of Emerging Networking Technologies (SENT). 2014.
Ghodsi, Ali, et al. “Information-centric networking: seeing the forest for the trees.” Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, 2011.
Ghodsi, Ali, et al. “Naming in content-oriented architectures.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2011.
Gupta, Anjali, Barbara Liskov, and Rodrigo Rodrigues. “Efficient Routing for Peer-to-Peer Overlays.” NSDI. vol. 4. 2004.
Heckerman, David, John S. Breese, and Koos Rommelse. “Decision-Theoretic Troubleshooting.” Communications of the ACM. 1995.
Heinemeier, Kristin, et al. “Uncertainties in Achieving Energy Savings from HVAC Maintenance Measures in the Field.” ASHRAE Transactions 118.Part 2 (2012).
Herlich, Matthias et al., “Optimizing Energy Efficiency for Bulk Transfer Networks”, Apr. 13, 2010, pp. 1-3, retrieved for the Internet: URL:http://www.cs.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/informationik/ag-karl/publications/miscellaneous/optimizing.pdf (retrieved on Mar. 9, 2012).
Hoque et al., ‘NLSR: Named-data Link State Routing Protocol’, Aug. 12, 2013, ICN 2013, pp. 15-20.
https://code.google.com/p/ccnx-trace/.
I. Psaras, R.G. Clegg, R. Landa, W.K. Chai, and G. Pavlou, “Modelling and evaluation of CCN-caching trees,” in Proc. IFIP Networking 2011, Valencia, Spain, May 2011, pp. 78-91.
Intanagonwiwat, Chalermek, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. ‘Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks.’ Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 2000.
J. Aumasson and D. Bernstein, “SipHash: a fast short-input PRF”, Sep. 18, 2012.
J. Hur, “Improving security and efficiency in attribute-based data sharing,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng., vol. 25, No. 10, pp. 2271-2282, Oct. 2013.
V. Jacobson et al., ‘Networking Named Content,’ Proc. IEEE CoNEXT '09, Dec. 2009.
Jacobson et al., “Custodian-Based Information Sharing,” Jul. 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine: vol. 50 Issue 7 (p. 3843).
Ji, Kun, et al. “Prognostics enabled resilient control for model-based building automation systems.” Proceedings of the 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. 2011.
K. Liang, L. Fang, W. Susilo, and D.S. Wong, “A Ciphertext-policy attribute-based proxy re-encryption with chosen-ciphertext security,” in Proc. INCoS 2013, Xian, China, Sep. 2013, pp. 552-559.
Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part I.” HVAC&R Research 11.1 (2005): 3-25.
Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part II.” HVAC&R Research 11.2 (2005): 169-187.
L. Wang et al., ‘OSPFN: An OSPF Based Routing Protocol for Named Data Networking,’ Technical Report NDN-0003, 2012.
L. Zhou, V. Varadharajan, and M. Hitchens, “Achieving secure role-based access control on encrypted data in cloud storage,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 1947-1960, Dec. 2013.
Li, Wenjia, Anupam Joshi, and Tim Finin. “Coping with node misbehaviors in ad hoc networks: A multi-dimensional trust management approach.” Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2010 Eleventh International Conference on. IEEE, 2010.
Lopez, Javier, et al. “Trust management systems for wireless sensor networks: Best practices.” Computer Communications 33.9 (2010): 1086-1093.
M. Green and G. Ateniese, “Identity-based proxy re-encryption,” in Proc. ACNS 2007, Zhuhai, China, Jun. 2007, pp. 288-306.
M. Ion, J. Zhang, and E.M. Schooler, “Toward content-centric privacy in ICN: Attribute-based encryption and routing,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 39-40.
M. Naor and B. Pinkas “Efficient trace and revoke schemes,” in Proc. FC 2000, Anguilla, British West Indies, Feb. 2000, pp. 1-20.
M. Nystrom, S. Parkinson, A. Rusch, and M. Scott, “PKCS#12: Personal information exchange syntax v. 1.1,” IETF RFC 7292, K. Moriarty, Ed., Jul 2014.
M. Parsa and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “A Protocol for Scalable Loop-free Multicast Routing.” IEEE JSAC, Apr. 1997.
M. Walfish, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Shenker, “Untangling the web from DNS,” in Proc. USENIX NSDI 2004, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737.
Mahadevan, Priya, et al. “Orbis: rescaling degree correlations to generate annotated internet topologies.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 37. No. 4. ACM, 2007.
Mahadevan, Priya, et al. “Systematic topology analysis and generation using degree correlations.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 36. No. 4. ACM, 2006.
Matocha, Jeff, and Tracy Camp. ‘A taxonomy of distributed termination detection algorithms.’ Journal of Systems and Software 43.3 (1998): 207-221.
Matted Varvello et al., “Caesar: A Content Router for High Speed Forwarding”, ICN 2012, Second Edition on Information-Centric Networking, New York, Aug. 2012.
McWilliams, Jennifer A., and Iain S. Walker. “Home Energy Article: A Systems Approach to Retrofitting Residential HVAC Systems.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2005).
Merindol et al., “An efficient algorithm to enable path diversity in link state routing networks”, Jan. 10, Computer Networks 55 (2011), pp. 1132-1140.
Mobility First Project [online], http://mobilityfirst.winlab.rutgers.edu/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Narasimhan, Sriram, and Lee Brownston. “HyDE—A General Framework for Stochastic and Hybrid Modelbased Diagnosis.” Proc. DX 7 (2007): 162-169.
NDN Project [online], http://www.named-data.net/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Omar, Mawloud, Yacine Challal, and Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah. “Certification-based trust models in mobile ad hoc networks: A survey and taxonomy.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35.1 (2012): 268-286.
P. Mahadevan, E.Uzun, S. Sevilla, and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “CCN-krs: A key resolution service for ccn,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-centric Networking, Ser. INC 14 New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 97-106. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2660129.2660154.
S. Deering, “Multicast Routing in Internetworks and Extended LANs,” Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88, Aug. 1988.
S. Deering et al., “The PIM architecture for wide-area multicast routing,” IEEE/ACM Trans, on Networking, vol. 4, No. 2, Apr. 1996.
S. Jahid, P. Mittal, and N. Borisov, “EASiER: Encryption-based access control in social network with efficient revocation,” in Proc. ACM ASIACCS 2011, Hong Kong, China, Mar. 2011, pp. 411-415.
S. Kamara and K. Lauter, “Cryptographic cloud storage,” in Proc. FC 2010, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, Jan. 2010, pp. 136-149.
S. Kumar et al. “Peacock Hashing: Deterministic and Updatable Hashing for High Performance Networking,” 2008, pp. 556-564.
S. Misra, R. Tourani, and N.E. Majd, “Secure content delivery in information-centric networks: Design, implementation, and analyses,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 73-78.
S. Yu, C. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou, “Achieving secure, scalable, and fine-grained data access control in cloud computing,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2010, San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2010, pp. 1-9.
S.J. Lee, M. Gerla, and C. Chiang, “On-demand Multicast Routing Protocol in Multihop Wireless Mobile Networks,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 7, No. 6, 2002.
Scalable and Adaptive Internet Solutions (SAIL) Project [online], http://sail-project.eu/ Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Schein, Jeffrey, and Steven T. Bushby. A Simulation Study of a Hierarchical, Rule-Based Method for System-Level Fault Detection and Diagnostics in HVAC Systems. US Department of Commerce,[Technology Administration], National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005.
Shani, Guy, Joelle Pineau, and Robert Kaplow. “A survey of point-based POMDP solvers.” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 27.1 (2013): 1-51.
Sheppard, John W., and Stephyn GW Butcher. “A formal analysis of fault diagnosis with d-matrices.” Journal of Electronic Testing 23.4 (2007): 309-322.
Shneyderman, Alex et al., ‘Mobile VPN: Delivering Advanced Services in Next Generation Wireless Systems’, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 3-29.
Solis, Ignacio, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. ‘Robust content dissemination in disrupted environments.’ proceedings of the third ACM workshop on Challenged networks. ACM, 2008.
Sun, Ying, and Daniel S. Weld. “A framework for model-based repair.” AAAI. 1993.
T. Ballardie, P. Francis, and J. Crowcroft, “Core Based Trees (CBT),” Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88, Aug. 1988.
T. Dierts, “The transport layer security (TLS) protocol version 1.2,” IETF RFC 5246, 2008.
T. Koponen, M. Chawla, B.-G. Chun, A. Ermolinskiy, K.H. Kim, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica, ‘A data-oriented (and beyond) network architecture,’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 181-192, Oct. 2007.
V. Goyal, 0. Pandey, A. Sahai, and B. Waters, “Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2006, Alexandria, VA, USA, Oct.-Nov. 2006, pp. 89-98.
V. Jacobson, D.K. Smetters, J.D. Thornton, M.F. Plass, N.H. Briggs, and R.L. Braynard, ‘Networking named content,’ in Proc. ACM CoNEXT 2009, Rome, Italy, Dec. 2009, pp. 1-12.
Verma, Vandi, Joquin Fernandez, and Reid Simmons. “Probabilistic models for monitoring and fault diagnosis.” The Second IARP and IEEE/RAS Joint Workshop on Technical Challenges for Dependable Robots in Human Environments. Ed. Raja Chatila. Oct. 2002.
Vutukury, Srinivas, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A simple approximation to minimum-delay routing. vol. 29. No. 4. ACM, 1999.
W.-G. Tzeng and Z.-J. Tzeng, “A public-key traitor tracing scheme with revocation using dynamic shares,” in Proc. PKC 2001, Cheju Island, Korea, Feb. 2001, pp. 207-224.
Waldvogel, Marcel “Fast Longest Prefix Matching: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications”, A dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2002.
Walker, Iain S. Best practices guide for residential HVAC Retrofits. No. LBNL-53592. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (US), 2003.
Wang, Jiangzhe et al., “DMND: Collecting Data from Mobiles Using Named Data”, Vehicular Networking Conference, 2010 IEEE, pp. 49-56.
Xylomenos, George, et al. “A survey of information-centric networking research.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 16.2 (2014): 1024-1049.
Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘A case for stateful forwarding plane.’ Computer Communications 36.7 (2013): 779-791.
Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘Adaptive forwarding in named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review 42.3 (2012): 62-67.
Zahariadis, Theodore, et al. “Trust management in wireless sensor networks.” European Transactions on Telecommunications 21.4 (2010): 386-395.
Zhang, et al., “Named Data Networking (NDN) Project”, http://www.parc.com/publication/2709/named-data-networking-ndn-project.html, Oct. 2010, NDN-0001, PARC Tech Report.
Zhang, Lixia, et al. ‘Named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44.3 {2014): 66-73.
Soh et al., “Efficient Prefix Updates for IP Router Using Lexicographic Ordering and Updateable Address Set”, Jan. 2008, IEEE Transactions On Computers, vol. 57, No. 1.
Beben et al., “Content Aware Network based on Virtual Infrastructure”, 2012 13th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering.
Biradar et al., “Review of multicast routing mechanisms in mobile ad hoc networks”, Aug. 16, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35 (2012) 221-229.
D. Trossen and G. Parisis, “Designing and realizing and information-centric Internet,” IEEE Communications Magazing, vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 60-67, Jul. 2012.
Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al., “Automatic Routing Using Multiple Prefix Labels”, 2012, IEEE, Ad Hoc and Sensor Networking Symposium.
Gasti, Paolo et al., ‘DoS & DDoS in Named Data Networking’, 2013 22nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Aug. 2013, pp. 1-7.
lshiyama, “On the Effectiveness of Diffusive Content Caching in Content-Centric Networking”, Nov. 5, 2012, IEEE, Information and Telecommunication Technologies (APSITT), 2012 9th Asia-Pacific Symposium.
J. Hur and D.K. Noh, “Attribute-based access control with efficient revocation in data outsourcing systers,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 1214-1221, Jul. 2011.
Kaya et al., “A Low Power Lookup Technique for Multi-Hashing Network Applications”, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on Emerging VLSI Technologies and Architectures, Mar. 2006.
Hogue et al., “NLSR: Named-data Link State Routing Protocol”, Aug. 12, 2013, ICN'13.
Nadeem Javaid, “Analysis and design of quality link metrics for routing protocols in Wireless Networks”, PhD Thesis Defense, Dec. 15, 2010, Universete Paris-Est.
Wetherall, David, “Active Network vision and reality: Lessons form a capsule-based system”, ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Dec. 1, 1999. Pages 64-79.
Kulkarni A.B. et al., “Implementation of a prototype active network”, IEEE, Open Architectures and Network Programming, Apr. 3, 1998, pp. 130-142.
Xie et al. “Collaborative Forwarding and Caching in Content Centric Networks”, Networking 2012.
European Search Report in counterpart European Application No. 16192113.5, dated Mar. 16, 2017, 11 pages.
Mosko, et al., “CCNx Messages in TLV Format,” ICNRG, Internet-Draft, Experimental, Jun. 29, 2015, 33 pages.
Jacobson, et al., “Networking Named Content,” CoNEXT'09, Dec. 2009, 12 pages.
Lui et al. (A TLV-Structured Data Naming Scheme for Content-Oriented Networking, pp. 5822-5827, International Workshop on the Network of the Future, Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on Jun. 10-15, 2012).
Peter Dely et al. “OpenFlow for Wireless Mesh Networks” Computer Communications and Networks, 2011 Proceedings of 20th International Conference on, IEEE, Jul. 31, 2011 (Jul. 31, 2011), pp. 1-6.
Garnepudi Parimala et al “Proactive, reactive and hybrid multicast routing protocols for Wireless Mesh Networks”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, IEEE, Dec. 26, 2013, pp. 1-7.
Tiancheng Zhuang et al. “Managing Ad Hoc Networks of Smartphones”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Oct. 1, 2013.
Amadeo et al. “Design and Analysis of a Transport-Level Solution for Content-Centric VANETs”, University “Mediterranea” of Reggio Calabria, Jun. 15, 2013.
Marc Mosko: “CCNx 1.0 Protocol Introduction” Apr. 2, 2014 [Retrieved from the Internet Jun. 8, 2016] http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.1%20CCNx%201.0%20Protocol%20Introduction.pdf *paragraphs [01.3], [002], [02.1], [0003].
Akash Baid et al: *Comparing alternative approaches for networking of named objects in the future Internet*, Computer Communications Workshops (Infocom Wkshps), 2012 IEEE Conference on, IEEE, Mar. 25, 2012, pp. 298-303, *Paragraph [002]* *figure 1*.
Priya Mahadevan: *CCNx 1.0 Tutorial*, Mar. 16, 2014, pp. 1-11, Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.2%20CCNx%201.0%20Tutorial.pdf [retrieved on Jun. 8, 2016] *paragraphs [003]-[006], [0011], [0013]* *figures 1,2*.
Marc Mosko et al “All-In-One Streams for Content Centric Networks”, May 24, 2015, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/AllinOne.pdf [downloaded Jun. 9, 2016] *the whole document*.
Cesar Ghali et al. *Elements of Trust in Named-Data Networking*, Feb. 13, 2014 Retrieved from the internet Jun. 17, 2016 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.3332v5.pdf *p. 5, col. 1* *p. 2, col. 1—2* * Section 4.1; p. 4, col. 2* *Section 4.2; p. 4, col. 2*.
Priya Mahadevan et al. “CCN-KRS”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-Centric Networking, Inc. '14, Sep. 24, 2014.
Flavio Roberto Santos et al. “Funnel: Choking Polluters in BitTorrent File Sharing Communities”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, IEEE vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 1, 2011.
Liu Wai-Xi et al: “Multisource Dissemination in content-centric networking”, 2013 Fourth International conference on the network of the future (NOF), IEEE, Oct. 23, 2013, pp. 1-5.
Marie-Jose Montpetit et al.: “Network coding meets information-centric networking”, Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on emerging Name-Oriented mobile networking design, architecture, algorithms, and applications, NOM '12, Jun. 11, 2012, pp. 31-36.
Asokan et al.: “Server-Supported Signatures”, Computer Security Esorics 96, Sep. 25, 1996, pp. 131-143, Section 3.
Mandl et al.: “A Fast FPGA Based Coprocessor Supporting Hard Real-Time Search”, New Frontiers of Information Technology, Proceedings of the 23rd Euromicro Conference Budapest, Sep. 1, 1997, pp. 499-506 *The Whole Document*.
Sun et al.: “Content-Based Route Lookup Using CAMs”, Global Communications Conference, IEEE, Dec. 3, 2012 *The Whole Document*.
Gelenbe et al.: “Networks With Cognitive Packets”, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2000. IEEE, Aug. 29, 2000, pp. 3-10.
Vangelis et al.: “On the Role of Semantic Descriptions for Adaptable Protocol Stacks in the Internet of Things”, 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, IEEE, May 13, 2014, pp. 437-443, *last paragraph of section II.B*.
Smetters et al. “Securing Network Content” Technical Report, PARC TR-2009-1, Oct. 1, 2009, Retrieved from the internet URL:http//www.parc.com/content/attachments/TR-2009-01.pdf [retrieved Nov. 1, 2016].
Marc Mosko “CCNx Label Forwarding (CCNLF)” Jul. 21, 2014.
Gallo Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs “Content-Centric Networking Packet Header Format” Jan. 26, 2015.
Huard J-F et al. “A Programmable Transport Architecture with QOS Guarantees” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 36, No. 10, Oct. 1, 1998.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, 2002, Microsoft Press, p. 23.
Mind—A Brief Introduction, John R. Searle, 2004, Oxford University Press, pp. 62-67.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170111330 A1 Apr 2017 US