End-capped polyisobutylene polyurethane

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11851522
  • Patent Number
    11,851,522
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 23, 2022
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 26, 2023
    4 months ago
Abstract
A polymeric material includes a polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer. The polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer includes soft segments, hard segments, and end groups. The soft segments include a polyisobutylene diol residue. The hard segments include a diisocyanate residue. The end groups are bonded by urea bonds to a portion of the diisocyanate residue. The end groups include a residue of a mono-functional amine.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to polymeric materials. More specifically, the disclosure relates to polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymers, methods for making polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymers, and medical devices containing polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymers


BACKGROUND

Polymeric materials are widely used in the field of medical devices. For example, polymeric materials such as silicone rubber, polyurethane, and fluoropolymers are used as coating and/or insulating materials for medical leads, stents, catheters, and other devices.


Block copolymers are polymeric materials made of alternating sections of polymerized monomers. Polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymers are polymeric materials with many unique physical and mechanical properties. Exemplary properties, which may be particularly desirable in the field of medical devices, include thermal stability, chemical resistance, biocompatibility, and gas impermeability, among others.


Incorporating polymeric materials into implantable medical devices may be done by a variety of methods, depending on the specific application. In some applications, for example, for implantable lead bodies, the polymeric material may be extruded at a temperature sufficient to cause the block copolymer to flow, but not high enough to cause the polymeric material to break down. That is, the material that forms the lead after the extrusion and cooling has largely the same structure as the original polymeric material.


In other applications, it may be desirable to employ solvent-based processing to incorporate a polymeric material into an implantable medical device. Solvent-based processing includes electrospraying, electrospinning, spray coating, dip coating, and force spinning. Essential to all solvent-based processing of polymeric materials is the ability to bring the polymeric material into solution while retaining the basic structure of the polymeric material.


SUMMARY

Example 1 is a polymeric material including a polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer. The polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer includes soft segments, hard segments, and end groups. The soft segments include a polyisobutylene diol residue. The hard segments include a diisocyanate residue. The end groups are bonded by urea bonds to a portion of the diisocyanate residue. The end groups include a residue of a mono-functional amine.


Example 2 is the polymeric material of Example 1, wherein the mono-functional amine is a primary amine or a secondary amine.


Example 3 is the polymeric material of either of Examples 1 or 2, wherein the mono-functional amine includes a C3 to C30 aliphatic chain.


Example 4 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 1-3, wherein the mono-functional amine is butylamine.


Example 5 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 1-4, wherein the soft segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, and the hard segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 30% to about 60% by weight of the copolymer.


Example 6 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 1-5, wherein the diisocyanate residue includes 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate residue.


Example 7 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 1-6, wherein the hard segments further include a chain extender residue.


Example 8 is the polymeric material of Example 7, wherein the chain extender residue is 1,4-butanediol residue.


Example 9 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 1-8, wherein the soft segments further include at least one of a polyether diol residue, a polyester diol residue, and a polycarbonate diol residue.


Example 10 is a medical device including the polymeric material of any of Examples 1-9.


Example 11 is a method of making a polymeric material. The method includes heating a mixture of soft segment components and hard segment components to an elevated temperature to form a prepolymer, reacting a chain extender with the prepolymer to form a polymer, and reacting an end capping agent with at least one of: the prepolymer and the polymer to form the polymeric material. The soft segment components include a polyisobutylene diol. The hard segment components include a diisocyanate. The end capping agent includes a mono-functional amine.


Example 12 is the method of Example 11, wherein the mono-functional amine is a primary amine or a secondary amine.


Example 13 is the method of either of Examples 11 or 12, wherein the mono-functional amine includes a C3 to C30 aliphatic chain.


Example 14 is the method of any of Examples 11-13, wherein the mono-functional amine is butylamine.


Example 15 is the method of any of Examples 11-14, wherein the diisocyanate is in stoichiometric excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol and the chain extender, and the mono-functional amine is an at least equimolar amount with respect to the diisocyanate.


Example 16 is a polymeric material including a polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer. The polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer includes soft segments, hard segments, and end groups. The soft segments include a polyisobutylene diol residue. The hard segments include a diisocyanate residue. The end groups are bonded by urea bonds to a portion of the diisocyanate residue. The end groups include a residue of a mono-functional amine including a C3 to C30 aliphatic chain.


Example 17 is the polymeric material of Example 16, wherein the mono-functional amine is a primary amine or a secondary amine.


Example 18 is the polymeric material of Example of either of Examples 16 or 17, wherein the mono-functional amine is butylamine.


Example 19 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 16-18, wherein the soft segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, and the hard segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 30% to about 60% by weight of the copolymer.


Example 20 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 16-19, wherein the diisocyanate residue includes 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate residue.


Example 21 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 16-19, wherein the hard segments further include a chain extender residue.


Example 22 is the polymeric material of Example 21, wherein the chain extender residue is 1,4-butanediol residue.


Example 23 is the polymeric material of any of Examples 16-22, wherein the soft segments further include at least one of: a polyether diol residue, a polyester diol residue, and a polycarbonate dial residue.


Example 24 a medical device including a polymeric material. The polymeric material includes a polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer. The polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer includes soft segments, hard segments, and end groups. The soft segments include a polyisobutylene diol residue. The hard segments include a diisocyanate residue. The end groups are bonded by urea bonds to a portion of the diisocyanate residue. The end groups include a residue of a mono-functional amine including a C3 to C30 aliphatic chain.


Example 25 is the medical device of Example 24, wherein the mono-functional amine is a primary amine or a secondary amine.


Example 26 is the medical device of either of Examples 24 or 25, wherein the mono-functional amine is butylamine.


Example 27 is the medical device of any of Examples 24-26, wherein the soft segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, and the hard segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 30% to about 60% by weight of the copolymer.


Example 28 is the medical device of any of Examples 24-27, wherein the diisocyanate residue includes 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate residue.


Example 29 is a method of making a polymeric material. The method includes heating a mixture of soft segment components and hard segment components to an elevated temperature to form a prepolymer, reacting a chain extender with the prepolymer to form a polymer, and reacting an end capping agent with at least one of: the prepolymer and the polymer to form the polymeric material. The soft segment components include a polyisobutylene diol. The hard segment components include a diisocyanate. The end capping agent includes a mono-functional amine including a C3 to C30 aliphatic chain.


Example 30 is the method of Example 29, wherein the mono-functional amine is a primary amine or a secondary amine.


Example 31 is the method of either of Examples 29 or 30, wherein the mono-functional amine is butylamine.


Example 32 is the method of any of Examples 29-31, wherein the diisocyanate is in stoichiometric excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol and the chain extender, and the mono-functional amine is an at least equimolar amount with respect to the diisocyanate.


Example 33 is the method of any of Examples 29-32, wherein heating the mixture of the soft segment components and the hard segment components to an elevated temperature and reacting the chain extender with the heated mixture are in the presence of a tertiary amine catalyst.


Example 34 is the method of Example 29, wherein the diisocyanate includes 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate.


Example 35 is the method of any of Examples 29-34, wherein the soft segment components further include a polytetramethylene oxide diol, the diisocyanate is in stoichiometric excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol, the chain extender, and the polytetramethylene oxide diol, and the mono-functional amine is an at least equimolar amount with respect to the diisocyanate.


While multiple examples are disclosed, still other examples in accordance with this disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a first step of a process to produce polyisobutylene-polyurethane according to some embodiments of this disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a second step of a process to produce polyisobutylene-polyurethane according to some embodiments of this disclosure.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating another process to produce polyisobutylene-polyurethane according to some embodiments of this disclosure.



FIG. 4 is a plot of dynamic viscosity as a function of concentration for polyisobutylene-polyurethane solutions according to some embodiments of this disclosure.





While this disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The intention, however, is not to limit the disclosure to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, this disclosure is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In accordance with various aspects of the disclosure, polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymers (also referred to herein collectively as “PIB—PUR”) and methods for making the same are disclosed. Medical devices that can be implantable or insertable into the body of a patient and that comprise a polyisobutylene urethane copolymer are also disclosed. PIB—PUR is a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPUs) that contains hard and soft segments. PIB—PUR is useful in a number of applications, including in medical devices used for insertion or implantation into a patient because they are hydrolytically stable and have good oxidative stability.


Polyurethanes are a family of copolymers that are synthesized from polyfunctional isocyanates (e.g., diisocyanates, including both aliphatic and aromatic diisocyanates) and polyols (e.g., macroglycols). Commonly employed macroglycols include polyester diols, polyether diols and polycarbonate diols. The macroglycols can form polymeric segments of the polyurethane. Aliphatic or aromatic diols may also be employed as chain extenders, for example, to impart improved physical properties to the polyurethane.


In some embodiments, the polyisobutylene urethane copolymer includes one or more polyisobutylene segments, one or more segments that includes one or more diisocyanate residues, optionally one or more additional polymeric segments (other than polyisobutylene segments), and optionally one or more chain extenders.


As used herein, a “polymeric segment” or “segment” is a portion of a polymer. The polyisobutylene segments of the polyisobutylene urethane copolymers are generally considered to constitute soft segments, while the segments containing the diisocyanate residues are generally considered to constitute hard segments. The additional polymeric segments may include soft or hard polymeric segments. As used herein, soft and hard segments are relative terms to describe the properties of polymer materials containing such segments. Without limiting the foregoing, a soft segment may display a glass transition temperature (Tg) that is below body temperature, more typically from 35° C. to 20° C. to 0° C. to −25° C. to −50° C. or below. A hard segment may display a Tg that is above body temperature, more typically from 40° C. to 50° C. to 75° C. to 100° C. or above. Tg can be measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and/or thermomechanical analysis (TMA).


The weight ratio of soft segments to hard segments in the polyisobutylene urethane copolymers of the various embodiments can be varied to achieve a wide range of physical and mechanical properties, and to achieve an array of desirable functional performance. For example, the weight ratio of soft segments to hard segments in the polymer can be varied from 99:1 to 95:5 to 90:10 to 75:25 to 50:50 to 25:75 to 10:90 to 5:95 to 1:99, more particularly from 95:5 to 90:10 to 80:20 to 70:30 to 65:35 to 60:40 to 50:50, and even more particularly, from about 80:20 to about 50:50. In some embodiments, the soft segment components can be about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, and the hard segment components can be about 30% to about 60% by weight of the copolymer.


In some embodiments, the copolymer may include polyisobutylene in an amount of about 60% to about 100% by weight of the soft segments and a polyether, a polyester, or a polycarbonate in an amount of about 0% to about 40% by weight of the soft segments. For example, the copolymer may include soft segments in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, of which polyisobutylene is present in an amount of about 60% to about 100% by weight of the soft segments and polyether is present in an amount of about 0% to about 40% by weight of the soft segments. In another embodiment, the copolymer may include soft segments in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, of which polyisobutylene (e.g., a polyisobutylene diol residue) is present in an amount of about 70% to about 95% by weight of the soft segments and a polyether (e.g., polytetramethylene oxide diol residue) is present in an amount of about 5% to about 40% by weight of the soft segments.


Diisocyanates for use in forming PIB—PUR of the various embodiments include aromatic and non-aromatic (e.g., aliphatic) diisocyanates. Aromatic diisocyanates may be selected from suitable members of the following, among others: 4,4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), 2,4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (2,4-MDI), 2,4- and/or 2,6-toluene diisocyanate (TDI), 1,5-naphthalene diisocyanate (NDI), para-phenylene diisocyanate, 3,3′-tolidene-4,4′-diisocyanate and 3,3′-dimethyl-diphenylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate. Non-aromatic diisocyanates may be selected from suitable members of the following, among others: 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H12-MDI), 3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl isocyanate (isophorone diisocyanate or IPDI), cyclohexyl diisocyanate, and 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (TMDI).


In some embodiments, a polyether diol such as polytetramethylene oxide diol (PTMO diol), polyhexametheylene oxide diol (PHMO diol), polyoctamethylene oxide diol or polydecamethylene oxide diol, can be combined with a polyisobutylene diol and diisocyanate to form a polyisobutylene polyurethane copolymer. In some embodiments, PIB—PUR may have a generally uniform distribution of polyurethane hard segments, polyisobutylene segments and polyether segments to achieve favorable micro-phase separation in the polymer. In some embodiments, polyether segments may improve key mechanical properties such as Shore hardness, tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural modulus, elongation tear strength, flex fatigue, tensile creep, and/or abrasion performance, among others.


The polyisobutylene diol may be a telechelic polyisobutylene diol formed from by carbocationic polymerization beginning with a difunctional initiator compound, such as 5-tert-butyl-1,3-bis(1-methoxy-1-methylethyl)benzene (hindered dicumyl ether).


PIB—PUR in accordance with the various embodiments may further include one or more optional chain extender residues. Chain extenders can increase the hard segment length, which can in turn results in a copolymer with a higher tensile modulus, lower elongation at break and/or increased strength.


Chain extenders can be formed from aliphatic or aromatic diols, in which case a urethane bond is formed upon reaction with an isocyanate group. Chain extenders may be selected from suitable members of the following, among others: 1,4 cyclohexanedimethanol, alpha,omega-alkane diols such as ethylene glycol (1,2-ethane diol), 1,4-butanediol (BDO), and 1,6-hexanediol. Chain extenders may be also selected from suitable members of, among others, short chain diol polymers (e.g., alpha,omega-dihydroxy-terminated polymers having a molecular weight less than or equal to 1000) based on hard and soft polymeric segments (more typically soft polymeric segments) such as those described above, including short chain polyisobutylene diols, short chain polyether polyols such as polytetramethylene oxide diols, short chain polysiloxane diols such as polydimethylsiloxane dials, short chain polycarbonate diols such as polyhexamethylene carbonate diols, short chain poly(fluorinated ether) diols, short chain polyester dials, short chain polyacrylate dials, short chain polymethacrylate dials, and short chain polyvinyl aromatic) dials. Chain extenders may also be selected form suitable glycols, such as propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, and tripropylene glycol.


As noted above, it may be desirable to employ solvent-based processing to incorporate a polymeric material, such as PIB—PUR, into an implantable medical device. In some embodiments, the PIB—PUR may be synthesized and stored for a period of time until it is incorporated into the solvent processing. For example, the PIB—PUR may be stored for a period of days, weeks or months. For solvent processing, the PIB—PUR is dissolved in a solvent, such as, for example, 2,6-dimethylpyridine or tetrahydrofuran (THF), to obtain a desired concentration and/or viscosity of the resulting PIB—PUR solution. The PIB—PUR solution can then be deposited onto a substrate, such as a medical device, by electrospraying, electrospinning, spray coating, dip coating, or force spinning.


It has been found that as PIB—PUR is stored for an extended period of time, on the order of weeks and months, the molecular weight (both the weight average molecular weight (Mw) and the number average molecular weight (Mn)) of the PIB—PUR can increase during the storage period. In some cases, the stored PIB—PUR forms a gel. Such gels are that is no longer easily soluble in 2,6-dimethylpyridine or THF and thus, no longer suitable for solvent-based processing.


It has been found that, in some embodiments, an end-capping agent that is a mono-functional amine can mitigate the increase in molecular weight due to extended storage time. In addition, it has been found that, in some embodiments, the addition of such an end capping agent to PIB—PUR that has been stored for an extended period of time can reverse the increase in molecular weight of the PIB—PUR. Further, it has been found that the addition of such an end capping agent to PIB—PUR even after is has gelled and is no longer soluble in 2,6-dimethylpyridine or THF can break down the cross-links in the gel so that the PIB—PUR is soluble in 2,6-dimethylpyridine or THF. A gel is defined as a substantially dilute cross-linked system which exhibits no flow when in a steady-state.


The mono-functional amine can include a C3 to C30 aliphatic chain that can be straight or branched, saturated or unsaturated, a primary amine or a secondary amine. For example, in some embodiments, the mono-functional amine can be a butylamine or a butylamine ether, such as 2-methoxy ethylamine.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a first step of a process to produce polyisobutylene-polyurethane according to some embodiments of this disclosure. A polymeric material including PIB—PUR according to embodiments of this disclosure can be made by mixing soft segment components 10, including polyisobutylene diol 12 and optional polyether diol 14 (PTMO is illustrated), and hard segment component 16, including a diisocyanate 18 (MDI is illustrated), together and heating the mixture to an elevated temperature in the presence of a catalyst 20 to form a prepolymer 22.


An elevated temperature is any temperature above room temperature, such as 30° C., 40° C., 50° C., 60° C., 70° C., 80° C., 90° C., or 100° C., or any temperature between any of the preceding temperatures. The catalyst can be any suitable catalyst, such as, an organometallic catalyst, for example, tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate (stannous octoate), or a tertiary amine catalyst, for example, 2,6-dimethylpyridine, 1-cyclohexyl-N,N-dimethylmethanamine, N,N,N′,N′,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine, or 4-methylmorpholine, 1-methylimidazole.


The second step is shown in FIG. 2. A chain extender 24 (BDO is illustrated) is reacted at an elevated temperature with the prepolymer 22, along with the mono-functional amine 26 (butylamine is illustrated) in the presence of the catalyst 20 to form a PIB—PUR 28. As shown in FIG. 2, the mono-functional amine 26 caps the ends of the PIB—PUR 28, reacting with the diisocyanate 18 to prevent further chain extension. The mono-functional amine 26 may also react with excess diisocyanate 18 and reduce unwanted side reactions. In some embodiments, the mono-functional amine 26 may be added to the prepolymer 22 at the same time as the chain extender 24. In other embodiments, the mono-functional amine 26 may be added after the chain extender 24 has at least partially reacted with the prepolymer 22 to form a polymer. In some embodiments, the mono-functional amine 26 may be added to the prepolymer 22 at the same time as the chain extender 24 and after the chain extender 24 has at least partially reacted with the prepolymer 22 to form a polymer.


The diisocyanate 18 can be in stoichiometric excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol 12, the optional polyether diol 14, and the chain extender 24. The diisocyanate 18 may be in excess to account for diisocyanate lost to reactions with residual water. For example, in some embodiments, the diisocyanate 18 is in excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol 12, the optional polyether 14, and the chain extender 24 by as little as 0.5 mole percent (mol %), 1 mol % 1.5 mol %, or 2 mol %, or as much as 2.5 mol %, 3 mol %, 4 mol %, or 5 mol %, or any value between any two of the preceding values. For example in some embodiments, the diisocyanate 18 is in excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol 12, the optional polyether 14, and the chain extender 24 by from 0.5 mol % to 5 mol %, 1 mol % to 4 mol %, 1.5 mol % to 3 mol %, 2 mol % to 2.5 mol %, or 0.5 mol % to 2.5 mol %.


In some embodiments, the mono-functional amine 26 can be added in at least equimolar amounts with respect to the diisocyanate 18. In some embodiments, an excess of the mono-functional amine 26 can be added. If necessary, some of the excess mono-functional amine 26 can be removed by heating above the boiling point of the mono-functional amine 26. For example, excess butylamine can be removed by heating above about 78° C., the boiling point of butylamine.


Thus, the PIB—PUR 28 illustrated in FIG. 2 is a polymeric material including at least soft segments including a residue of the polyisobutylene diol 12, hard segments including at least residue of the diisocyanate 18, and end groups bonded to some of the diisocyanate residue by a urea bond. The end groups are a residue of the mono-functional amine 26. The hard segments of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 further include a residue of the chain extender 24. The soft segments of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 also further include a residue of the polyether diol 14. In some embodiments, the soft segments can alternatively or additionally include a residue of a polycarbonate diol and/or a polyester diol.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating another process to produce polyisobutylene-polyurethane according to some embodiments of this disclosure. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the mono-functional amine 26 (butylamine is shown) is added after the polymerization reaction is at least substantially complete. The polymerization reaction is at least substantially complete when there is no noticeable increase in the viscosity of the polyisobutylene-polyurethane over a period of several hours. FIG. 3 shows a PIB—PUR chain 30 and a diisocyanate residue 32 bonded to a urethane linkage of the PIB—PUR 30 to form an allophanate 34. In some embodiments, the PIB—PUR 30 may have been produced and end-capped with a mono-functional amine as for PIB—PUR 28 described above. In other embodiments, the PIB—PUR 30 may not have been end-capped with a mono-functional amine when initially synthesized. The diisocyanate residue 32 may be a result of the excess of diisocyanate used to make the PIB—PUR 30 as described above.


Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that during storing for an extended period of time, the diisocyanate residue 32 also bonds with other hard or soft segment components, including other chains of the PIB—PUR 30 (not shown), thus cross-linking the other hard or soft segment components to the PIB—PUR 30, increasing the molecular weight of the PIB—PUR 30, and eventually gelling the PIB—PUR 30 as described above. These side reactions can form the allophanate 34. Other side reactions can form other cross-linking structures, such as a biuret (not shown).


The allophanate 34 is a reversible bond. As noted above, it has been found that the addition of the mono-functional amine 26, even after the PIB—PUR 30 has gelled, reverses the gelling of the PIB—PUR 30 and reduces its molecular weight. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the steric hindrance associated with the allophanate 34 weakens the bond, resulting in the reversible bond shown in FIG. 3. It is believed that the diisocyanate residue 32 bonds preferentially with the mono-functional amine 26, tying up the diisocyanate residue 32 in a more stable alkyl amine 36 (a butyl amine shown), as shown in FIG. 3. Tying up the diisocyanate reside 32 may prevent reformation of the allophanate 34 and reduce the cross-linking of the other hard or soft segment components to the PIB—PUR 30, breaking down the gelation of the PIB—PUR 30 and reducing the molecular weight of the PIB—PUR 30. In some embodiments, the molecular weight of the PIB—PUR 30 may be reduced to an initial molecular weight of a linear chain of PIB—PUR 30.


The amine termination of the mono-functional amine 26 is believed to be well suited to this application, in contrast to, for example, a similarly-structured mono-functional alcohol. It has been found that while the mono-functional amine 26 is effective in reversing gelation of the PIB—PUR 30, a similarly-structured mono-functional alcohol is not effective.


The PIB—PUR 26 or PIB—PUR 30 according to embodiments of this disclosure can be incorporated into medical devices which can be implanted or inserted into the body of a patient. Example medical devices may include, without limitation, vascular grafts, electrical leads, catheters, leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCP), pelvic floor repair support devices, shock coil coverings, covered stents, urethral stents, internal feeding tubes/balloons, structural heart applications including valve leaflets, suture sleeves, breast implants, ophthalmic applications including intraocular lenses and glaucoma tubes, and spinal disc repair. Example electrical leads may include, without limitation, implantable electrical stimulation or diagnostic systems including neurostimulation systems such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems, deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) systems, gastric nerve stimulation systems, cochlear implant systems, and retinal implant systems, among others, and cardiac systems including implantable cardiac rhythm management (CRM) systems, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD's), and cardiac resynchronization and defibrillation (CRDT) devices, among others.


EXAMPLES

The present disclosure is more particularly described in the following examples that are intended as illustrations only, since numerous modifications and variations within the scope of the present disclosure will be apparent to those of skill in the art. Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages, and ratios reported in the following examples are on a weight bases, and all reagents used in the examples were obtained, or are available, from the chemical suppliers described below, or may be synthesized by conventional techniques.


Example 1
PIB—PUR Treatment after 98 Days

Polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer (PIB—PUR) including soft segments including a polyisobutylene diol residue and hard segments including a diisocyanate residue was prepared as follows. In a 1 liter resin kettle, 106 grams of telechelic polyisobutylene diol formed from by carbocationic polymerization beginning with 5-feat-butyl-1,3-bis(1-methoxy-1-methylethyl)benzene, 72 grams of 4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), and 56 grams of polytetramethylene oxide diol were dissolved in 545 grams of 2,6-dimethylpyridine. The 1 liter resin kettle was equipped with overhead mechanical stirring and was purged with dry nitrogen gas. The polyisobutylene diol had a number average molecular weight (Mn) of 1905 grams/mole and the polytetramethylene oxide diol had a Mn of 1000 grams/mole. The solution was stirred by the overhead mechanical stirrer under the flow of nitrogen gas at a temperature of 60 degrees Celsius while the reagents reacted for 2 hours. After the 2 hours, 16 grams of freshly distilled 1,4-butanediol was added to the solution by dropwise addition and the solution maintained at a temperature of 70 degrees Celsius while the reaction continued for an additional 2 hours. After the additional 2 hours, the solution was highly viscous solution containing the PIB—PUR.


The PIB—PUR was stored at room temperature in a sealed container. After 15 days, the PIB—PUR was characterized by gel permeation chromatography using a multi angle light scattering detector (GPC-MALLS) to determine the number average molecular weight (Mn) and the weight average molecular weight (Mw). The PIB—PUR was recharacterized after 63 days and 98 days. The results are shown in Table 1 below. As shown in Table 1 the molecular weight increased, particularly between 64 and 98 days. At 98 days, the PIB—PUR was observed to have gelled. The gelled PIB—PUR was found to be predominantly insoluble in either 2,6-dimethylpyridine or THF, indicating that chemical cross-linking of the PIB—PUR had occurred (the molecular weight was determined from a soluble fraction).


The gelled PIB—PUR was treated with butylamine in excess equimolar concentration to the MDI by adding 2,6-dimethylpyridine and 0.5 g of butylamine to 1 g of the gelled PIB—PUR, and then shaking on a shaker table at 225 rpm at 30° C. for about 12 hours. The treated PIB—PUR became a viscous liquid again indicating that whatever chemical cross-linking had taken place appeared to have been reversed with the addition of the butylamine. The treated PIB—PUR solution was recharacterized after 24 hours and after 25 days. The results are also shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the molecular weight of the treated PIB—PUR decreased significantly with the addition of the butylamine.













TABLE 1







PIB-PUR
Mn
Mw




















After 15 days
128,100
286,100



After 63 days
132,200
282,500



After 98 days
213,100
393,100



24 hours after
109,200
259,700



Butylamine





Treatment





25 days after
89,600
217,000



Butylamine





Treatment










Example 2
PIB—PUR Treatment after 24 Days

Polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer (PIB—PUR) including soft segments including a polyisobutylene diol residue and hard segments including a diisocyanate residue was prepared as follows. In a 1 liter resin kettle, 105 grams of telechelic polyisobutylene diol formed from by carbocationic polymerization beginning with 5-tert-butyl-1,3-bis(1-methoxy-1-methylethyl)benzene, 72 grams of 4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), and 57 grams of polytetramethylene oxide diol were dissolved in 546 grams of 2,6-dimethylpyridine. The 1 liter resin kettle was equipped with overhead mechanical stirring and was purged with dry nitrogen gas. The polyisobutylene diol had a number average molecular weight (Mn) of 1905 grams/mole and the polytetramethylene oxide diol had a Mn of 1000 grams/mole. The solution was stirred by the overhead mechanical stirrer under the flow of nitrogen gas at a temperature of 60 degrees Celsius while the reagents reacted for 2 hours. After the 2 hours, 16 grams of freshly distilled 1,4-butanediol was added to the solution by dropwise addition and the solution maintained at a temperature of 70 degrees Celsius while the reaction continued for an additional 2 hours. After the additional 2 hours, the solution was highly viscous solution containing the PIB—PUR.


The PIB—PUR was stored at room temperature in a sealed container. The PIB—PUR was characterized after 24 days by gel permeation chromatography using a multi angle light scattering detector (GPC-MALLS) to determine the number average molecular weight (Mn) and the weight average molecular weight (Mw). The results are shown in Table 2 below.


The PIB—PUR was treated with butylamine in at least equimolar concentration to the MDI by adding 2,6-dimethylpyridine and 0.08 g of butylamine to 1 g of the PIB—PUR, and then shaken on a shaker table at 225 rpm at 30° C. for about 12 hours. The treated PIB—PUR solution was stored at room temperature in a sealed container and recharacterized after 24 hours. The results are also shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the molecular weight of the treated PIB—PUR decreased significantly with the addition of the butylamine suggesting that at least some of the chemical cross-linking that had taken place over 24 days appeared to have been reversed with the addition of the butylamine.













TABLE 2







PIB-PUR
Mn
Mw




















After 24 days
138,700
313,600



24 hours after
51,330
142,500



Butylamine





Treatment










A dynamic viscosity was measured for various concentrations of the PIB—PUR of Example 2 in 2,6-dimethylpyridine before treatment 40 and 24 hours after treatment 42 with the butylamine. Three PIB—PUR solutions of various concentrations were prepared for each of the before treatment 40 and after treatment 42 by adding appropriate amounts of 2,6-dimethylpyridine. The results are shown in FIG. 4. As shown in FIG. 4, the dynamic viscosity dropped significantly with the addition of the butylamine, again suggesting that at least some of the chemical cross-linking that had taken place over 24 days appeared to have been reversed with the addition of the butylamine.


Example 3
PIB—PUR Treatment after 21 Days

Polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer (PIB—PUR) including soft segments including a polyisobutylene diol residue and hard segments including a diisocyanate residue was prepared as follows. In a 1 liter resin kettle 13 grams of telechelic polyisobutylene diol formed from by carbocationic polymerization beginning with 5-tert-butyl-1,3-bis(1-methoxy-1-methylethyl)benzene, 9 grams of 4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), and 7 grams of polytetramethylene oxide diol were dissolved in 8 grams of 2,6-dimethylpyridine. The 1 liter resin kettle was equipped with overhead mechanical stirring and was purged with dry nitrogen gas. The polyisobutylene diol had a number average molecular weight (Mn) of 1905 grams/mole and the polytetramethylene oxide diol had a Mn of 1000 grams/mole. The solution was stirred by the overhead mechanical stirrer under the flow of nitrogen gas at a temperature of 60 degrees Celsius while the reagents reacted for 2 hours. After the 2 hours, 2 grams of freshly distilled 1,4-butanediol was added to the solution by dropwise addition and the solution maintained at a temperature of 70 degrees Celsius while the reaction continued for an additional 2 hours. After the additional 2 hours, the solution was highly viscous solution containing the PIB—PUR.


The PIB—PUR was stored at room temperature in a sealed container. The PIB—PUR was characterized after 21 days by gel permeation chromatography using a multi angle light scattering detector (GPC-MALLS) to determine the number average molecular weight (Mn) and the weight average molecular weight (Mw). The results are shown in Table 3 below.


The PIB—PUR was treated with butylamine in at least equimolar concentration to the MDI by adding 2,6-dimethylpyridine and 0.08 g of butylamine to 1 g of the PIB—PUR, and then shaken on a shaker table at 225 rpm at 30° C. for about 12 hours. The treated PIB—PUR solution was stored at room temperature in a sealed container and recharacterized after 24 hours and after 17 days. The results are also shown in Table 3. As shown in Table 3, the molecular weight of the treated PIB—PUR decreased significantly with the addition of the butylamine suggesting that at least some of the chemical cross-linking that had taken place over 21 days appeared to have been reversed with the addition of the butylamine. As further shown in Table 3, the cross-links did not reappear over an additional 17 days of storage.













TABLE 3







PIB-PUR
Mn
Mw




















After 21 days
71,700
184,000



24 hours after
65,970
159,000



Butylamine





Treatment





17 days after
61,970
147,800



Butylamine





Treatment










A dynamic viscosity was measured for various concentrations of the PIB—PUR of Example 2 in 2,6-dimethylpyridine before treatment 44 and 24 hours after treatment 46 with the butylamine. Three PIB—PUR solutions of various concentrations were prepared for each of the before treatment 40 and after treatment 42 by adding appropriate amounts of 2,6-dimethylpyridine. The results are shown in FIG. 4. As shown in FIG. 4, the dynamic viscosity dropped significantly with the addition of the butylamine, again suggesting that at least some of the chemical cross-linking that had taken place over 24 days appeared to have been reversed with the addition of the butylamine.


Various modifications and additions can be made to the embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of this disclosure. For example, while the embodiments described above refer to particular features, the scope of this disclosure also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the described features. Accordingly, the scope of this disclosure is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A polymeric material comprising: a polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer including: soft segments including a polyisobutylene diol residue and least one of: a polyether diol residue, a polyester diol residue, and a polycarbonate diol residue;hard segments including a diisocyanate residue; andend groups bonded by urea bonds to a portion of the diisocyanate residue, the end groups including a residue of a mono-functional, primary amine having a C3 to C30 aliphatic straight chain, wherein the soft segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, and the hard segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 30% to about 60% by weight of the copolymer.
  • 2. The polymeric material of claim 1, wherein the diisocyanate residue includes 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate residue.
  • 3. The polymeric material of claim 1, wherein the hard segments further include a chain extender residue.
  • 4. The polymeric material of claim 3, wherein the chain extender residue is 1,4-butanediol residue.
  • 5. A medical device comprising: a polymeric material including: a polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer including: soft segments including a polyisobutylene diol residue and least one of: a polyether diol residue, a polyester diol residue, and a polycarbonate diol residue;hard segments including a diisocyanate residue; andend groups bonded by urea bonds to a portion of the diisocyanate residue, the end groups including a residue of a mono-functional, primary amine having a C3 to C30 aliphatic straight chain, wherein the soft segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the copolymer, and the hard segments are present in the copolymer in an amount of about 30% to about 60% by weight of the copolymer.
  • 6. The medical device of claim 5, wherein the diisocyanate residue includes 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate residue.
  • 7. A method of making a polymeric material, the method comprising: heating a mixture of soft segment components and hard segment components to an elevated temperature, the soft segment components including a polyisobutylene diol and least one of: a polyether diol, a polyester diol, and a polycarbonate diol, and the hard segment components including a diisocyanate to form a prepolymer;reacting a chain extender with the prepolymer to form a polyisobutylene-polyurethane block polymer; andreacting an end capping agent with at least one of: the prepolymer and the polymer to form the polymeric material, wherein the end capping agent is a mono-functional, primary amine having a C3 to C30 aliphatic straight chain, and wherein the soft segment components are present in the polymeric material in an amount of about 40% to about 70% by weight of the polymeric material, and the hard segment components are present in the polymeric material in an amount of about 30% to about 60% by weight of the polymeric material.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the diisocyanate is in stoichiometric excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol and the chain extender, and the mono-functional amine is in at least equimolar amount with respect to the diisocyanate.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein heating the mixture of the soft segment components and the hard segment components to an elevated temperature and reacting the chain extender with the heated mixture are in the presence of a tertiary amine catalyst.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the diisocyanate includes 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the soft segment components further include a polytetramethylene oxide diol, the diisocyanate is in stoichiometric excess with respect to the polyisobutylene diol, the chain extender, and the polytetramethylene oxide diol, and the mono-functional amine is in at least equimolar amount with respect to the diisocyanate.
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the end capping agent is reacted with the prepolymer to form the polymeric material.
  • 13. The method of claim 7, wherein the end capping agent is reacted with the polymer to form the polymeric material.
  • 14. The polymeric material of claim 3, wherein the soft segments include the polyether diol residue, the diisocyanate residue is 4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate residue and the chain extender residue is 1,4-butanediol residue.
  • 15. The polymeric material of claim 14, wherein the polyisobutylene-polyurethane block copolymer is a thermoplastic block copolymer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/248,498, filed Jan. 15, 2019 and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/618,262, filed Jan. 17, 2018, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (392)
Number Name Date Kind
2182513 Buckeridge Dec 1939 A
2202877 Stevens et al. Jun 1940 A
2240558 Carleton May 1941 A
2451420 Watkins Oct 1948 A
2463452 Yule Mar 1949 A
3069236 Schultz et al. Dec 1962 A
3148028 Schultz et al. Sep 1964 A
3328372 Thomas et al. Jun 1967 A
3427366 Verdol et al. Feb 1969 A
3505252 Brotherton et al. Apr 1970 A
3642964 Rausch et al. Feb 1972 A
3755265 Fletcher et al. Aug 1973 A
3815611 Denniston, III Jun 1974 A
3966624 Duling et al. Jun 1976 A
4043331 Martin et al. Aug 1977 A
4103079 Thaler Jul 1978 A
4118427 Rhein et al. Oct 1978 A
4145515 Pogozelski et al. Mar 1979 A
4154913 Hergenrother et al. May 1979 A
4157429 Hergenrother et al. Jun 1979 A
4157430 Hergenrother et al. Jun 1979 A
4230509 Tulis et al. Oct 1980 A
4276394 Kennedy et al. Jun 1981 A
4304771 Suh et al. Dec 1981 A
4316973 Kennedy Feb 1982 A
4342849 Kennedy Aug 1982 A
4352359 Larimore et al. Oct 1982 A
4374276 Boden et al. Feb 1983 A
4404297 Fishler et al. Sep 1983 A
4420411 Boden et al. Dec 1983 A
4423185 Matsumoto et al. Dec 1983 A
4425264 Boden et al. Jan 1984 A
4430233 Boden et al. Feb 1984 A
4477604 Oechsle, III Oct 1984 A
4484586 McMickle et al. Nov 1984 A
4486572 Kennedy Dec 1984 A
4508889 Noren et al. Apr 1985 A
4518615 Cherukuri et al. May 1985 A
4539996 Engel Sep 1985 A
4570270 Oechsle, III Feb 1986 A
4600652 Solomon et al. Jul 1986 A
4675361 Ward Jun 1987 A
4686137 Ward, Jr. et al. Aug 1987 A
4752626 Hoye et al. Jun 1988 A
4767885 Kennedy Aug 1988 A
4771082 Solodovnik et al. Sep 1988 A
4861830 Ward Aug 1989 A
4880883 Grasel et al. Nov 1989 A
4888389 Kennedy et al. Dec 1989 A
4906673 Mori Mar 1990 A
4910321 Kennedy et al. Mar 1990 A
4928689 Hauser May 1990 A
4939184 Kennedy Jul 1990 A
4982038 Kimble et al. Jan 1991 A
5000875 Kolouch Mar 1991 A
5017664 Grasel et al. May 1991 A
5026814 Re et al. Jun 1991 A
5029585 Lieber et al. Jul 1991 A
5090422 Dahl et al. Feb 1992 A
5103837 Weidlich et al. Apr 1992 A
5120813 Ward Jun 1992 A
5129404 Spehr et al. Jul 1992 A
5149739 Lee Sep 1992 A
5152299 Soukup Oct 1992 A
5171760 Kaszas et al. Dec 1992 A
5194505 Brugel Mar 1993 A
5212248 Knoll et al. May 1993 A
5269810 Hull et al. Dec 1993 A
5282844 Stokes et al. Feb 1994 A
5285844 Schneid Feb 1994 A
5322520 Milder Jun 1994 A
5324324 Vachon et al. Jun 1994 A
5330520 Maddison et al. Jul 1994 A
5332791 Knoll et al. Jul 1994 A
5332798 Ferreri et al. Jul 1994 A
5340881 Kennedy et al. Aug 1994 A
5385579 Helland Jan 1995 A
5428123 Ward et al. Jun 1995 A
5433730 Alt Jul 1995 A
5442010 Hauenstein et al. Aug 1995 A
5442015 Kennedy et al. Aug 1995 A
5476496 Strandberg et al. Dec 1995 A
5554178 Dahl et al. Sep 1996 A
5559067 Lerner et al. Sep 1996 A
5585444 Blackborow et al. Dec 1996 A
5589563 Ward et al. Dec 1996 A
5609622 Soukup et al. Mar 1997 A
5630844 Dogan et al. May 1997 A
5637647 Faust Jun 1997 A
5663234 Kennedy et al. Sep 1997 A
5665823 Saxena et al. Sep 1997 A
5677386 Faust Oct 1997 A
5681514 Woody Oct 1997 A
5741331 Pinchuk Apr 1998 A
5753764 Boutevin et al. May 1998 A
5755762 Bush May 1998 A
5766527 Schildgen et al. Jun 1998 A
5837313 Ding et al. Nov 1998 A
5849415 Shalaby et al. Dec 1998 A
5852118 Horrion et al. Dec 1998 A
5853652 Schildgen et al. Dec 1998 A
5861023 Vachon Jan 1999 A
5874484 Dirckx et al. Feb 1999 A
5886089 Knowlton Mar 1999 A
5898057 Chiang et al. Apr 1999 A
5902329 Hoffmann et al. May 1999 A
5912302 Gadkari et al. Jun 1999 A
5931862 Carson Aug 1999 A
5987746 Williams Nov 1999 A
5991667 Feith Nov 1999 A
6005051 Kennedy et al. Dec 1999 A
6010715 Wick et al. Jan 2000 A
6072003 Horrion et al. Jun 2000 A
6087454 Vanhaeren et al. Jul 2000 A
6093197 Bakula et al. Jul 2000 A
6117554 Shalaby et al. Sep 2000 A
6194487 Morimoto et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200589 Kennedy et al. Mar 2001 B1
6228945 Kennedy et al. May 2001 B1
6236893 Thong May 2001 B1
6242058 Bahadur et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253110 Brabec et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256541 Heil et al. Jul 2001 B1
6284682 Troczynski et al. Sep 2001 B1
6361780 Ley et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363286 Zhu et al. Mar 2002 B1
6365674 Kaufhold et al. Apr 2002 B1
6426114 Troczynski et al. Jul 2002 B1
6436136 Flodin et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444334 Doi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6545097 Pinchuk et al. Apr 2003 B2
6555619 Kennedy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6600956 Maschino et al. Jul 2003 B2
6627724 Meijs et al. Sep 2003 B2
6653365 Jia Nov 2003 B2
6703433 Bahadur et al. Mar 2004 B1
6706779 Bahadur et al. Mar 2004 B2
6709514 Hossainy Mar 2004 B1
6730324 Troczynski et al. May 2004 B2
6770325 Troczynski et al. Aug 2004 B2
6808766 Miyama et al. Oct 2004 B1
6827881 Molnar et al. Dec 2004 B2
6849667 Haseyama et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852794 Puhala et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869466 Day et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870024 Haubennestel et al. Mar 2005 B2
6889092 Zhu et al. May 2005 B2
6896965 Hossainy May 2005 B1
7013182 Krishnan Mar 2006 B1
7065411 Verness Jun 2006 B2
7101956 Benz et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105622 Kennedy et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115300 Hossainy Oct 2006 B1
7119138 Feeney et al. Oct 2006 B1
7160941 Jin et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174221 Chen et al. Feb 2007 B1
7180172 Sethumadhavan et al. Feb 2007 B2
7196142 Kennedy et al. Mar 2007 B2
7231259 Jenney et al. Jun 2007 B2
7247364 Hossainy et al. Jul 2007 B2
7279175 Chen et al. Oct 2007 B2
7280875 Chitre et al. Oct 2007 B1
7289856 Karicherla Oct 2007 B1
7292890 Whitehurst et al. Nov 2007 B2
7347751 Sweeney et al. Mar 2008 B2
7358306 Turri et al. Apr 2008 B2
D579758 Tanaka et al. Nov 2008 S
7465777 Zoromski et al. Dec 2008 B2
7470728 Jia et al. Dec 2008 B2
7501179 Song et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504052 Ehbing et al. Mar 2009 B2
7524890 Lee et al. Apr 2009 B2
7553546 Tan Jun 2009 B1
7572515 Sethumadhavan et al. Aug 2009 B2
7617004 Bartels et al. Nov 2009 B2
7715922 Tan May 2010 B1
7727541 Richard et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756589 Krishnan Jul 2010 B2
7820769 Seifalian et al. Oct 2010 B2
7825199 Matyjaszewski et al. Nov 2010 B1
7881808 Borgaonkar et al. Feb 2011 B2
7979142 Krishnan Jul 2011 B2
8034874 Strickler et al. Oct 2011 B2
8075906 Richard et al. Dec 2011 B2
8163826 Willberg et al. Apr 2012 B2
8304471 Joseph et al. Nov 2012 B2
8304482 Joseph et al. Nov 2012 B2
8324290 Desai et al. Dec 2012 B2
8349123 Zhang et al. Jan 2013 B2
8372468 Desai et al. Feb 2013 B2
8374704 Desai et al. Feb 2013 B2
8394393 Mather et al. Mar 2013 B2
8501831 Desai et al. Aug 2013 B2
D689734 Bock Sep 2013 S
8529934 Desai et al. Sep 2013 B2
8644952 Desai et al. Feb 2014 B2
8660663 Wolf et al. Feb 2014 B2
8674034 Kennedy et al. Mar 2014 B2
8676344 Desai et al. Mar 2014 B2
8765238 Atanasoska et al. Jul 2014 B2
8889926 Kennedy et al. Nov 2014 B2
8903507 Desai et al. Dec 2014 B2
8927660 Desai et al. Jan 2015 B2
8962785 Faust et al. Feb 2015 B2
8969424 Lin Mar 2015 B2
8992512 Richard et al. Mar 2015 B2
9011516 Weber et al. Apr 2015 B2
9574043 Faust et al. Feb 2017 B2
9655720 Bluestein et al. May 2017 B2
9926399 Faust et al. Mar 2018 B2
10513576 Faust et al. Dec 2019 B2
10526429 Delaney et al. Jan 2020 B2
10562998 Faust et al. Feb 2020 B2
11472911 Delaney, Jr. et al. Oct 2022 B2
20010021743 Wakana et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020012694 Moo-Young et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020022826 Reynolds et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020028303 Bahadur et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020058981 Zhu et al. May 2002 A1
20020107133 Troczynski et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107330 Pinchuk et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138123 Casas-Bejar et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020155144 Troczynski et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020193459 Haseyama et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198282 Jia Dec 2002 A1
20030018156 Meijs et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030031699 Van Antwerp Feb 2003 A1
20030040785 Maschino et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050408 Puhala et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055179 Ota et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030073961 Happ Apr 2003 A1
20030093136 Osypka et al. May 2003 A1
20030108588 Chen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030125499 Benz et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140787 Day et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030176613 Hohberg Sep 2003 A1
20030204022 Kennedy et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030236558 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040037886 Hsu Feb 2004 A1
20040054210 Benz et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059402 Soukup et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063805 Pacetti et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040068036 Halladay et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040127674 Haubennestel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143255 Vanney et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040171779 Matyjaszewski et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040175558 El-Nounou et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186545 Rosero et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193139 Armstrong et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040198901 Graham et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040262739 Sethumadhavan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050031874 Michal et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050037050 Weber Feb 2005 A1
20050038135 Jin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043585 Datta et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060022 Felt et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070985 Knapp et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079199 Heruth et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080470 Westlund et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050143808 Hossainy et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050173780 Sethumadhavan et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050180919 Tedeschi Aug 2005 A1
20050272894 Kennedy et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288408 Resendes et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288476 Yilgor et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009540 Jia et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060047083 Yilgor et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060047098 Anna et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069419 Sweeney et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060111465 Jia et al. May 2006 A1
20060129217 Krishnan Jun 2006 A1
20060135721 Lange Jun 2006 A1
20060142503 Lang et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060171981 Richard et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060223946 Faust et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235499 Heil, Jr. et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060249446 Yeager Nov 2006 A1
20060249447 Yeager Nov 2006 A1
20060264577 Faust et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070051531 Borganonkar et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070093604 Kennedy et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106144 Squeri May 2007 A1
20070117925 Strickler et al. May 2007 A1
20070122361 Jia May 2007 A1
20070128246 Hossainy et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135601 Diakoumakos et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070141339 Song et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142560 Song et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070151531 Masaoka et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070190104 Kamath et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070190108 Datta et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070190319 Kalayci Aug 2007 A1
20070203302 Kennedy et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208155 Zoromski et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070239245 Borgaonkar et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070269485 Richard et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282411 Franz et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080008739 Hossainy et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080009939 Gueriguian et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080051866 Chen et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080095918 Kleiner et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108773 Wicks et al. May 2008 A1
20080119374 Willberg et al. May 2008 A1
20080161443 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161900 Weber et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167423 Richards et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167710 Dave et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175881 Ippoliti et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080194736 Lu Aug 2008 A1
20080208325 Helmus et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080233164 Seifalian et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080311173 Schwarz et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090054961 Borgaonkar et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090156772 Strickler et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090187162 Ohara et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090242123 Zhang et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090292094 Larichev et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090326077 Desai et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100023104 Desai et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025703 Towns et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055470 Klun et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069578 Faust et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100075018 Desai et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100107967 Tanaka et al. May 2010 A1
20100179298 Faust et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100241071 Atanasoska et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241204 Scheuermann Sep 2010 A1
20100241208 Pinchuk Sep 2010 A1
20100241209 Krishnan Sep 2010 A1
20100249296 Kimura et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100267897 Kennedy et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100323330 Jia Dec 2010 A1
20100324200 Joseph et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015303 Joseph et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110045030 Desai et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110051581 Janik et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054580 Desai et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054581 Desai et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110087317 Borgaonkar et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110152989 Tan Jun 2011 A1
20110213084 Kennedy et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110244001 Mather et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110263808 Mather et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120077934 Faust et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120083523 Richard et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120158107 Wolf et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120259069 Kennedy et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120309661 Adams et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130013040 Desai et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041108 Kennedy et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130041442 Arnholt et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130079487 Faust et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130122185 Desai et al. May 2013 A1
20130131765 Polkinghorne et al. May 2013 A1
20130131767 Desai et al. May 2013 A1
20130209716 Custodero et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130216840 Radhakrishnan et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130313118 Lin Nov 2013 A1
20130317128 Lin Nov 2013 A1
20130330390 Pacetti Dec 2013 A1
20130331538 Kennedy et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140074201 Arnholt et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088218 Desai et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140096964 Chakraborty et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140144580 Desai et al. May 2014 A1
20140194963 Desai et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140235905 Kennedy et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140242141 Atanasoska et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140256846 Sevignon et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140272447 Maye et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140275598 Freeman et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288222 Yano et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140299249 Custodero et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303724 Bluestein et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140343190 Custodero et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140343216 Custodero et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140378575 Sevignon et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150056553 Huang et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150274876 Faust Oct 2015 A1
20160008607 Kane et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160024340 Rukavina Jan 2016 A1
20160145362 Wettling et al. May 2016 A1
20160311983 Delaney et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170100237 Anderson-Cunanan et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170137558 Faust et al. May 2017 A1
20170174845 Delaney, Jr. et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170327622 Delaney et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180208698 Faust et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180258196 Delaney, Jr. et al. Sep 2018 A1
20190054204 Delaney, Jr. et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190218334 Delaney et al. Jul 2019 A1
20200109232 Faust et al. Apr 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (131)
Number Date Country
9003841 Feb 1992 BR
1221430 May 1987 CA
1248606 Jan 1989 CA
2114874 Aug 1994 CA
2278680 Aug 1998 CA
1221430 Jun 1999 CN
1248606 Mar 2000 CN
1745111 Mar 2006 CN
102131530 Jul 2011 CN
102304679 Jan 2012 CN
102341134 Feb 2012 CN
102365308 Feb 2012 CN
102712808 Oct 2012 CN
104231207 Dec 2014 CN
102573940 Apr 2015 CN
104520345 Apr 2015 CN
104592850 May 2015 CN
104602888 May 2015 CN
104610902 May 2015 CN
104640918 May 2015 CN
106129383 Nov 2016 CN
2418075 Oct 1975 DE
19610350 Sep 1997 DE
0153520 Sep 1985 EP
0259492 Mar 1988 EP
0275907 Jul 1988 EP
0610714 Aug 1994 EP
0732349 Sep 1996 EP
0837097 Apr 1998 EP
1061092 Dec 2000 EP
0961796 May 2002 EP
1489109 Dec 2004 EP
2006328 Dec 2008 EP
2385960 Nov 2011 EP
2922888 Sep 2015 EP
46-025014 Jul 1971 JP
61-031417 Feb 1986 JP
61073666 Apr 1986 JP
61-236814 Oct 1986 JP
63-199719 Aug 1988 JP
02088614 Mar 1990 JP
H02202908 Aug 1990 JP
4154815 May 1992 JP
06-345821 Dec 1994 JP
07-102017 Apr 1995 JP
07-330591 Dec 1995 JP
07331223 Dec 1995 JP
10-087726 Apr 1998 JP
1087726 Apr 1998 JP
11131325 May 1999 JP
H11256069 Sep 1999 JP
2000119363 Apr 2000 JP
2000169814 Jun 2000 JP
2000508368 Jul 2000 JP
2000-264947 Sep 2000 JP
2000-303255 Oct 2000 JP
2001011319 Jan 2001 JP
2001040064 Feb 2001 JP
2001131879 May 2001 JP
2001521788 Nov 2001 JP
2002-202908 Jul 2002 JP
2002348317 Dec 2002 JP
2003137951 May 2003 JP
2004204181 Jul 2004 JP
2006515795 Jun 2006 JP
2008238761 Oct 2008 JP
2009132832 Jun 2009 JP
2009535182 Oct 2009 JP
2009540873 Nov 2009 JP
2011526326 Oct 2011 JP
2012515231 Jul 2012 JP
2012519053 Aug 2012 JP
2013502495 Jan 2013 JP
2013503711 Feb 2013 JP
2013-166868 Aug 2013 JP
2014533580 Dec 2014 JP
2015523192 Aug 2015 JP
2017-521163 Aug 2017 JP
1987004625 Aug 1987 WO
9316131 Aug 1993 WO
1993022360 Nov 1993 WO
9526993 Oct 1995 WO
1995026993 Oct 1995 WO
1997000293 Jan 1997 WO
9707161 Feb 1997 WO
1997047664 Dec 1997 WO
1998033832 Aug 1998 WO
1998034678 Aug 1998 WO
1999051656 Oct 1999 WO
0213785 Feb 2002 WO
2003042273 May 2003 WO
2004004412 Jan 2004 WO
2004014453 Feb 2004 WO
2004044012 May 2004 WO
2004113400 Dec 2004 WO
2005035655 Apr 2005 WO
2006011647 Feb 2006 WO
2006110647 Oct 2006 WO
2007030722 Mar 2007 WO
2007117566 Oct 2007 WO
2007119687 Oct 2007 WO
2007126806 Nov 2007 WO
2007130900 Nov 2007 WO
2008060333 May 2008 WO
2008066914 Jun 2008 WO
2008112190 Sep 2008 WO
2008127730 Oct 2008 WO
2008156806 Dec 2008 WO
2009051945 Apr 2009 WO
2009058397 May 2009 WO
2009153600 Dec 2009 WO
2009158600 Dec 2009 WO
2009158609 Dec 2009 WO
2010039986 Apr 2010 WO
2010078552 Jul 2010 WO
2010081132 Jul 2010 WO
2010107530 Sep 2010 WO
2010111280 Sep 2010 WO
2010135418 Nov 2010 WO
2011022583 Feb 2011 WO
2011028873 Mar 2011 WO
2011060161 May 2011 WO
2012093597 Jul 2012 WO
2013005004 Jan 2013 WO
2013192186 Dec 2013 WO
2014018509 Jan 2014 WO
2014081916 May 2014 WO
2015007553 Jan 2015 WO
2016007367 Jan 2016 WO
2017106774 Jun 2017 WO
2017127642 Jul 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (183)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2010/028334, dated May 6, 2010, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2010/046072, dated Oct. 15, 2010, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2010/047633, dated Jun. 17, 2011, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2010/047703, dated Jun. 17, 2011, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2011/061692, dated Feb. 9, 2012, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/053448, dated Apr. 28, 2014, 11 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/053448, dated Jul. 28, 2014, correcting earlier version dated Apr. 28, 2014, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2016/027294 dated Jul. 28, 2016, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2016/067363, dated Mar. 3, 2017, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2017/031856, dated Aug. 11, 2017, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2018/021311, dated May 24, 2018, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2018/046813, dated Dec. 11, 2018, 11 pages.
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2009/048827, dated Oct. 6, 2009, 3 pages.
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2009/048845, dated Oct. 6, 2009, 3 pages.
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2010/020733, dated May 6, 2010.
Ioffe, David et al., “Bromine, Organic Compounds”, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 4, pp. 340-365, © 2002.
Ivan, B. et al., “Synthesis of New Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes”, Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Org. Coat. Plast. Prepr., 43, 908-913 (1980).
Ivan, B., et. al. Living Carbocationic Polymerization. XXX. One-Pot Synthesis of Allyl-Terminated Linear and Tri-Arm Star Polyisobutylenes, and Epoxy- and Polyisobutylenes, and Epoxy- and Hydroxy-Telechelics Therefrom. Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 28:89-104, 1990.
Jenny, C. et al., “A New Insulation Material for Cardiac Leads with Potential for Improved performance”, HRS 2005, HeartRhythm, 2, S318-S319 (2005).
Jewrajka, Suresh K. et al., “Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes. II. Polyureas Containing Mixed PIB/PTMO Soft Segments”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 47, 2787-2797 (2009).
Jewrajka, Suresh K. et al., “Polyisobutylene-Based Segmented Polyureas. I. Synthesis of Hydrolytically and Oxidatively Stable Polyureas”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 47, 38-48 (2009).
Kabalka, George W.; et al. “N-t-Butoxycarbonyl Protection of Primary and Secondary Amines in the Hydroboration Reaction: Synthesis of Amino Alcohols.” Synthetic Communications: An International Journal for Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 25(14), 2135-2143 (1995).
Kali, Gergely; et al. “Anionic Amphiphilic End-Linked Conetworks by the Combination of Quasiliving Carbocationic and Group Transfer Polymerizations.” Journal of Polymer Science, Part A—Polymer Chemistry, 2009, 47(17):4289-4301.
Kang, Jungmee et al., “Rendering Polyureas Melt Processible”, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 49, 2461-2467 (2011).
Kang, Jungmee et al., Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes. V. Oxidative-Hydrolytic Stability and Biocampatibility, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 48, 2194-2203 (2010).
Kang, Jungmee, et al. Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes with Unprecedented Properties and How They Came About. Polymer Chemistry, 49:3891-3904.
Kanna, Y. (2006). The degradative resistance of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanocore integrated polyurethanes: An in vitro study. Biomaterials, 27:1971-1979.
Kennedy, J.P. et al., “Designed Polymers by Carbocationic Macromolecular Engineering: Theory and practice”, Hanser Publishers 1991, pp. 191-193 and 226-233.
Kennedy, J.P. et al., “Polyisobutylene-Based Diols and Polyurethanes” , Urethane Chemistry and Applications, Ed., K. H. Edwards, ACS Symp. Book Series, 172, Washington, D.C. 1981, pp. 383-391.
Kennedy, J.P. et al., “Polyisobutylene-Based Diols and Polyurethanes” Advances in Urethane Science and Technology, vol. 8, 1981, pp. 245-251.
Kennedy, J.P. et al., “Polyisobutylene-based Model urethane Networks, I. Initial characterization and Physical properties”, Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 49, Copyright 1983 by ACS, pp. 69-77.
Kennedy, Joseph P. Synthesis, Characterization and Properties of Novel Polyisobutylene-Based urethane Model Networks, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 33(7), May 20, 1987, pp. 2449-2465.
Kennedy, Joseph P. “Synthesis, Characterization and Properties of Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes”, 6th International Technical/Marketing Conference: Polyurethane—New Paths to Progress-Marketing—Technology, Journal of Cellular Plastics, 1983, 19:288-307.
Kennedy, Joseph P. “Synthesis, Characterization and Properties of Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes”, Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, vol. 17 (Jan. 1985), pp. 82-88.
Kennedy, Joseph P. “Synthesis, Characterization and Properties of Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes”, The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc., polyurethane Division, Proceedings of the SPI—6th International Technical/Marketing Conference, Nov. 2-4, 1983, San Diego, CA, pp. 514-516.
Kennedy, Joseph P., “Polyurethanes Based on Polyisobutylenes”, Chemtech, Nov. 1986, 16(11), pp. 694-697.
Kidane, A. G.; et al. (2008). Review: Current developments and future prospects for heart valve replacement therapy. Wiley InterScience, pp. 290-303.
Kidane, A. G.; et al. (2009). A novel nanocomposite polymer for development of synthetic heart valve leaflets. Acta Biomaterialia, 5:2409-2417.
Kirby, Darren, “Use of a Bioactive Material on a Pacemaker Electrode for the Purpose of Enhancing Heart Pace/Sense Efficiency”, MSC Biomedical Engineering, Thesis, Trinity College Dublin (2003).
Knight, P. T.; et al. (2010). In vivo kinetic degradation analysis and biocompatibility of aliphatic polyester polyurethanes. Student Award Winner for Outstanding Research in the Ph.D. Category, 2010 Society for Biomaterials Annual Meeting, Seattle, Washington, Apr. 21-24, 2010; Wiley InterScience 2010, pp. 333-343.
Koberstein, J. T., et. al. Compression-Molded Polyurethane Block Copolymers. 1. Microdomain Morphology and Thermomechanical Properties. Macromolecules, 25:6195-6204, 1992.
Koberstein, J. T., et. al. Compression-Molded Polyurethane Block Copolymers. 2. Evaluation of Microphase Compositions. Macromolecules, 25:6205-6213, 1992.
Koberstein, J. T., et. al. Simultaneous SAXS-DSC Study of Multiple Endothermic Behavior in Polyether-Based Polyurethane Block Copolymers. Macromolecules, 19:714-720, 1986.
Kunal, K., et. al. Polyisobutylene: A Most Unusual Polymer. Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, 46:1390-1399, 2008.
Lazzarato, Loretta; et al. “(Nitrooxyacyloxy)methyl Esters of Aspirin as Novel Nitric Oxide Releasing Aspirins.” J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5058-5068.
“Butyl Rubber Properties and Applications”, downloaded form URL: hiit://ww.iisrp.com/WebPolymers/02ButylRubberIIR.pdf availale on the internet on Jul. 31, 2007 according to Wayback Web Archive.
Ako, Masayuke et al., “Polyisobutylene-based urethane foams I. Comparative reactivities of hydroxyl-terminated polyisobutylene-diols and -triols and other hydroxyl-capped polyols with isocyanate”, Polymer Bulletin 19(2), 137-143 (1988).
Ako, Masayuke et al., “Polyisobutylene-based urethane foams II. Synthesis and properties of novel polyisobutylene-based flexible polyurethane foams”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 37(5), Feb. 5, 1989, pp. 1351-1361.
Ayandele, E.; et al. (2012). Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsequioxane (POSS)-Containing Polymer Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials, 2:445-475.
Bacaloglu, R. and Cotarca, L. “Reactions of Aryl Isocyanates with Alcohols in the Presence Ob Tertiary Amines.” Journal f. prakt. Chemie. , 330(4):530-540.
Bela et al., Living Carbocation Polymerization. XX. Synthesis of Allyl-Telechelic Polyisobutylenes by One-Pot Polymerization-Functionalization polymer. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1988; 58:869-872.
Chang, Victor S.C. et al. “Gas Permeability, Water Absorption, Hydrolytic Stability and Air-Oven Aging of Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethane Networks”, Polymer Bulletin 8(2-3-4), 69-74 (1982).
Chen, Chi-Chang et al., “Solid Polymer Electrolytes III Preparation, Characterization, and Ionic Conductivity of New Gelled Polymer Electrolytes Based on Segmented, Perfluoropolyether-Modified Polyurethane”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 40, pp. 486-495 (2002).
Chen, D., et. al. Amphiphilic Networks: 11. Biocompatibility and Controlled Drug Release of Poly[Isobutylene-co-2-(dimethy1amino)Ethyl Methacrylate]. J. of Biomedical Materials Research, 23:1327-1342, 1989.
Chen, T. K., et. al. Glass Transition Behaviors of a Polyurethane Hard Segment based on 4, 4′-Diisocyanatodiphenylmethane and 1,4-Butanediol and the Calculation of Microdomain Composition. Macromolecules, 30:5068-5074, 1997.
Cho, J. C., et. al. Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, and Drug Release of Poly(Alkyl Methacrylate-B-Isobutylene-B-Alkyl Methacrylate). Biomacromolecules, 7:2997-3007, 2006.
Choi, T., et. al. Segmented Polyurethanes Derived from Novel Siloxane-Carbonate Soft Segments for Biomedical Applications. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 49:865-872, 2011.
Christenson, E. M., et. al. Oxidative Mechanisms of Poly(Carbonate Urethane) and Poly(Ether Urethane) Biodegradation: In Vivo and In Vitro Correlations. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 70A:245-255, 2004.
Claiborne, T. E., Slepian, M. J., Hossainy, S., & Bluestein, D. (2013). Polymeric trileaflet prosthetic heart valves: evolution and path to clinical reality. Expert Rev Med Devices., 9(6):577-594.
Communication in Cases for Which No Other Form is Applicable, issued in PCT/US2013/053448, dated Jul. 28, 2014, 1 page.
Cozzens, David et al. Long Term in Vitro Biostability of Segmented Polyisobutylene-Based Thermoplastic Polyurethanes. Journal of Biomedicals Materials Research Journal, Part A, 774-782, 2010.
De, Priyadarsi et al., “Carbocationic Polymerization of Isobutylene Using Methylaluminum Bromide Coinitiators: Synthesis of Bromoally Functional Polyisobutylene” Macromolecules, Oct. 2006, 39(2), 7527-7533.
De, Priyadarsi et al., “Relative Reactivity of C4 Olefins toward the Polyisobutylene Cation” Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6861-6870.
Efrat, T.; et al. (2006). Nanotailoring of polyurethane adhesive by polyhedral oligomerica silsequioxane (POSS). J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 20(12): 1413-1430.
Erdodi, G., et al., “Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes. III. Polyurethanes Containing PIB/PTMO Soft Co-Segments,” J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem, 47:5278-5290 (2009).
Erdodi, G., et al., “Polyisobutylene-Based Polyurethanes. VI. Unprecedented Combination of Mechanical Properties and Oxidative/Hydrolytic Stability by H-Bond Acceptor Chain Extenders” J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem, 48:2361-2371 (2010).
Examination Report and Search Report for Chinese Application No. 201380042582.3, dated Dec. 4, 2015, consisting of 6 pages.
Extended European Search Report issued in EP appln. 16206626.0, dated Apr. 25, 2017, 8 pages.
Fan, L., et. al. The Absolute Calibration of a Small-Angle Scattering Instrument with a Laboratory X-ray Source. XIV International Conference on Small-Angle Scattering (SAS09), Journal of Physics: Conference Series 247, 11 pages, 2010.
Faust, R. et al., “Method to Prepare Block Copolymers by The Combination of Cationic And Anionic Polymerization”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/225,905, filed Apr. 5, 2007.
Fischer, Stefan; et al. “Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Bromo- and Fluorodanicalipin A.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2555-2558.
Fu, B.X.; et al. (2001). Structural development during deformation of polyurethane containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) molecules. Polymer, 42:599-611.
Gadkari A. et al., “Preparation and biocompatibility of Novel Polar-Nonpolar Networks. Osynthesis, Characterization and Histological-Bacterial Analysis of Mixed Polytetrahydrofuran-Polyisobutylene Networks”, Polymer Bulletin, vol. 22, No. 1, Jul. 1, 1989, pp. 25-32.
Georgiou, Theoni K; et al. “Amphiphilic Model Conetworks of Polyisobutylene Methacrylate and 2-(Dimethylamino) ethyl Methacrylate Prepared by the Combination of Quasiliving Carbocationic and Group Transfer Polymerizations.” Macromolecules 2007, 40, 2335-2343.
Ghanbari, H.; et al. (2010). The anti-calcification potential of a silsesquioxane nanocomposite polymer under in vitro conditions: Potential material for synthetic leaflet heart valve. Acta Biomaterialia, 6:4249-4260.
Giusti, Paolo et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of New potentially Hemocompatible Thermoplastic Elastomers”, p. 371, Abstract.
Gu, W.; et al. (2011). Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) suppresses enzymatic degradation of PCL-based polyurethanes. Biomacromolecules, 12:3066-3077.
Gunatillake, P. A., et. al. Synthesis and Characterization of a Series of Poly(alkylene carbonate) Macrodiols and the Effect of Their Structure on the Properties of Polyurethanes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 69:1621-1633, 1998.
Gunatillake, P.A. et al., “Poly(dimethylsiloxane)/Poly(hexamethylene oxide) Mixed Macrodiol Based Polyurethane Elastomers. I. Synthesis and Properties”, Journal of Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 76, 2026-2040, © 2000.
Gyor, M., et. al. Living Carbocationic Polymerization of Isobutylene with Blocked Bifunctional Initiators in the Presence of Di-tert-butylpyridine as a Proton Trap. J. of Macromolecular Science, Part A, Pure Appl. Chem., 29 (8):639-653, 1992.
H. Mach and P. Rath. “Highly Reactive Polyisobutene as a Component of a New Generation of Lubricant and Fuel Additives,” Lubrication Science 11-2, Feb. 1999, pp. 175-185.
Hansen, Charles M. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook, 2nd ed. New York, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2007, 546 pages.
Hernandez, et. al. R. Microstructural Organization of Three-Phase Polydimethylsiloxane-Based Segmented Polyurethanes. Macromolecules, 40:5441-5449, 2007.
Hernandez, R., et. al. A Comparison of Phase Organization of Model Segmented Polyurethanes with Different Intersegment Compatibilities. Macromolecules, 41:9767-9776, 2008.
Higashihara, T. et al., “Synthesis of Poly(isobutylene-block-methyl methacrylate) by a Novel Coupling Approach”, Macromolecules, 39:5275-5279 (2006).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated May 26, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/071170, entitled “High Strength Polyisobutylene Polyurethanes”.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2016/027294, dated Nov. 2, 2017, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2016/067363, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2017/031856, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Chapter II, issued in PCT/US2006/035064, dated Sep. 12, 2007, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2006/013308, dated Aug. 25, 2006.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2006/035064, dated Jan. 23, 2007, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2007/007558, dated Sep. 20, 2007.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2007/008528, dated Oct. 2, 2007.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2007/012948, dated Nov. 28, 2007.
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 201980006384.9, dated Aug. 30, 2021, with English translation.
Toffe, David et al., “Bromine, Organic Compounds”, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 4, pp. 340-365, (Copyright) 2002.
Ivan, Bela, et. al. New Telechelic Polymers and Sequential Copolymers by Polyfunctional Initiator-Transfer Agents (Inifers). VII. Synthesis and Characterization of (Alpha),(Omega)-Di(Hydroxy) Polyisobutylene. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition, 18:3177-3191, 1980.
Ivan, Bela; et al. “Living Carbocationic Polymerization. XXX. One-Pot Synthesis of Allyl-Terminated Linear and Tri-Arm Star Polyisobutylenes, and Epoxy-and Hydroxy-Telechelics Therefrom.” Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 28, 89-104 (1990).
Jewrajka, Suresh K. et al., “Polyisobutylene-Based Segmented Polyureas. I. Synthesis of Hydrolytically and Oxidativeiy Stable Polyureas”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 47, 38-48 (2009).
Kang, Jungmee et al, “PIB-Based Polyurethanes. IV. The Morphology of Polyurethanes Containing Soft Co-Segments”, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 47, 6180-6190 (2009).
Koberstein, J. T., et al. Compression-Molded Polyurethane Block Copolymers. 1, Microdomain Morphology and ITherrnomechanical Properties. Macromolecules, 25:6195-6204, 1992.
Kunal, K., et. al. Polyisobutylene: A Most Unusual Polymer. Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, 46:1390-1399 2006.
Lelah, M.D. et al., “Polyurethanes in Medicine”, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1986, Chapter 3 D.
Leung, L. M., et. al. DSC Annealing Study of Microphase Separation and Multiple Endothermic Behavior in Polyether-Based Polyurethane Block Copolymers. Macromolecules, 19:706-713, 1986.
Lewis, S. (2000). Synthesis of polyisobutylene-silica hybrid stars and networks via sol-gel processing. Formal Seminar, pp. 1-25.
Li, J. et al., “Polyisobutylene supports—a non-polar hydrocarbon analog of PEG supports”, Tetrahedron, 61(51):12081-12092, Dec. 2005.
Macias, A. et al., “Preparacion y reticulacion de poliisobutilenos de bajo peso molecular con grupos terminales reactivos”, Revista de Plasticos Modernos, No. 332 (Apr. 1983), pp. 412-418.
Martin, D. J., et. al. Polydimethylsiloxane/Polyether-Mixed Macrodiol-Based Polyurethane Elastomers: Biostability. Biomaterials, 21:1021-1029, 2000.
Miller, J. A., “New Directions in Polyurethane Research”, Organic Coatings and Applied Polymer Science Proceedings, vol. 47, Copyright 1982 by ACS, pp. 124-129.
Mitzner, E. et al., “Modification of poly(ether urethane) elastomers by incorporation of poly(isobutylene) glycol. Relation between polymer properties and thrombogenicity”, J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer edn. vol. 7, No. 12, pp. 1105-1118 (1996).
Mitzner, E., et. al. Modification of Segmented Poly(Ether Urethanes) by Incorporation of Poly(Isobutylene)Glycol. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A., Pure and Applied Chemistry, 34(1):165-178, 1997.
Miyabayashi, Toshio et al., “Characterization of Polyisobutylene-Based Model Urethane Networks”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 31, pp. 2523-2532 (1986).
Motte, S., & Kaufman, L. J. (2012). Strain stiffening in collagen I Networks. Biopolymers, 99(1):35-46.
Muller, J.P. et al., “Surface modification of polyurethanes by multicomponent polyaddition reaction”, Journal of Materials Science Letters 17(2), 1998, pp. 115-118.
Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,059, dated Apr. 11, 2011.
Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/492,483, dated Nov. 21, 2011, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,858, dated Feb. 15, 2012, 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/492,483, dated Jul. 13, 2012, 9 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/071170, entitled: High Strength Polyisobutylene Polyurethanes, dated Jun. 6, 2014.
Odian, G. “Principles of Polymerization,” Wiley Interscience (2004), pp. 80-83.
Office Action issued in EP 07754128 dated Mar. 31, 2010.
Office Action issued in EP Application No. 07754128.2, dated Feb. 19, 2009, 3 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,059, dated Aug. 24, 2010.
Official Action for European Application No. 13802190.2-1301, dated Dec. 21, 2016, consisting of 5 pages.
Ojha et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Thermoplastic Polyurethaneureas based on Polyisobutylene and Poly (tetramethylene oxide) Segments”, J. Macromolecular Science, Part A, vol. 47(3), pp. 186-191, Mar. 2010.
Ojha, Umaprasana et al., “Syntheses and characterization of novel biostable polyisobutylene based thermoplastic polyurethanes”, Polymer 50(2009), 3448-3457.
Ojha, Umaprasana et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Endfunctionalized Polyisobutylenes for Sharpless-type Click Reactions”, Polymer Preprings 2007, 48(2), 786.
Pinchuk, L. Review: A Review of the Biostability and Carcinogenicity of Polyurethanes in Medicine and the New Generation of ‘Biostable’ Polyurethanes. J. Biomater. Sci., Polymer Edn., 6(3):225-267, 1994.
Pistor, V. (2012). Research article: Microstructure and crystallization kinetics of polyurethane thermoplastics containing trisilanol isobutyl POSS. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 283031, 8 pages.
Prucker, O., et al. Photochemical Attachment of Polymer Films to Solid Surfaces via Monolayers of Benzophenone Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121:8766-8770, 1999.
Puskas, J.E. et al., “polyisobutylene-based biomaterials”, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 42, Issue 13 (2004) pp. 3091-3109.
Raftopoulos, K. N. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of POSS on the molecular mobility of polyurethanes with varying segment Mw. Polymer, 54:2745-2754.
Raftopoulos, K. N., and Pielichowski, K. (2015). Segmental dynamics in hybrid polymer/POSS nanomaterials. Progress in Polymer Science, 52 pages.
Raftopoulos, K. N.; et al. (2013). POSS along the hard segments of polyurethane. Phase separation and molecular dynamics. Macromolecules, 46:7378-7386.
Rahmani, B.; et al. (2012). Manufacturing and hydrodynamic assessment of a novel aortic valve made of a new nanocomposite polymer. Journal of Biomechanics, 7 pages.
Rajkhowa, Ritimoni et al., “Efficient syntheses of hydroxyallyl end functional polyisobutylenes, a precursors to thermoplastic polyurethanes”, Polymer Reprints (American Chemical Society, Division of Polymer Chemistry) 2007, 48(2), 233-234.
Ranade, S. et al., “Physical characterization of controlled release of paclitaxel from the TAXUS(Trademark) Express2(Trademark) drug-eluting stent”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 71A (2004) 625-634.
Ranade, S.V. et al., “Styrenic Block copolymers for Biomaterial and Drug Delivery Applications”, Acta Biomater. Jan. 2005; 1(1): 137-44.
Rashid, S. T.; et al. (2004). The use of animal models in developing the discipline of cardiovascular tissue engineering: a review. Biomaterials, 25:1627-1637.
Response filed Aug. 31, 2009 to Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2009, EP App 07754128.
Saiani, A., et. al. Origin of Multiple Melting Endotherms in a High Hard Block Content Polyurethane. 1. Thermodynamic Investigation. Macromolecules, 34:9059-9068, 2001.
Saiani, A., et. al. Origin of Multiple Melting Endotherms in a High Hard Block ContentPolyurethane. 2. Structural Investigation. Macromolecules, 37:1411-1421, 2004.
Santos, R. et al., “New Telechelic Polymers and Sequential Copolymers by Polyfunctional Initiator-Transfer-Agents (Inifers)”, Polymer Bulletin, 11:341-348 (1984).
Schellekens, Yves, et al. “Tin-Free Catalysts for Production of Aliphatic Thermoplastic Polyurethanes.” Green Chemistry, 16:4401-4407, 2014.
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380042582.3, entitled “High Strength Polyisobutylene Polyurethanes” dated May 10, 2016 consisting of 5 pages.
Siefken, Von Werner. “Mono- und Polyisocyanate, IV. Mitteilung uber Polyurethane,” [With machine English translation]. Justus Liebigs Annalen Der Chemie, 562(2):75-136, 1949.
Simmons, Anne. et al., “The effect of sterilisation on a poly(dimethylsiloxane)/poly(hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol-based Polyurethane elastomer”, Biomaterials 2006, 27, 4484-4497.
Singh, Vishwakarma; et al. “Molecular complexity from aromatics. Cycloaddition of spiroepoxycyclohexa-2,4-dienones and intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction: a stereoselective entry into tetracyclic core of atisane diterpenoids.” Tetrahedron 69 (2013) 137-146.
Six, Christian, et al. “Isocyanates, Organic.” Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, vol. 20:63-82, 2012.
Soytas, S. H.; et al. (2009). Synthesis of POSS-functionalized polyisobutylene via direct initialization. Macromol. Rapid Commun., 30:2112-2115.
Speckhard et al., “New generation polyurethanes.” Polymer News (1984), 9(12), 354-8.
Speckhard, T.A. et al., “New generation polyurethanes”, Polymer News 1984, 9(12), 354-358.
Speckhard, T.A. et al., “Properties of Polyisobutylene Polyurethane Block Copolymers: 2. Macroglycols produced by the ‘inifer’ technique”, Polymer, vol. 26, No. 1, Jan. 1985, pp. 55-78.
Speckhard, T.A. et al., “Properties of Polyisobutylene Polyurethane Block Copolymers: 3. hard segments based on 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H12MD1) and butane dial”, Polymer, vol. 26, No. 1, Jan. 1985, pp. 70-78.
Speckhard, T.A. et al., “Properties of Polyisobutylene-Polyurethane Block Copolymers”, Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, vol. 15 (Jul. 1983), pp. 183-192.
Speckhard, T.A. et al., “Properties of Polyisobutylene-Polyurethane Block Copolymers: I. Macroglycols from Ozonolysis of Isobutylene-Isoprene Copolymer”, Polymer Engineering and Science, Apr. 1983, vol. 23. No, 6, pp. 337-349.
Speckhard, T.A. et al., “Ultimate Tensite Properties of Segmented Polyurethane Elastomers”, Rubber Chem. Technol., 59, 405-431 (1986).
Speckhard; T. A., et. al. Properties of Polyisobutylene Polyurethane Block Copolymers: 2. Macroglycols Produced by the “Inifer” Technique, Polymer, 26:55-69, 1985.
Stokes, K., et. al. Polyurethane Elastomer Biostability. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 9:321-354, 1995.
Storey, Robson F.; et al. “Carbocation Rearrangement in Controlled/Living Isobutylene Polymerization,” Macromolecules 1998, 31, pp. 1058-1063.
Tan, A.; et al. (2013). Surface modification of a polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane poly(carbonate-urea) urethane (POSS-PCU) nanocomposite polymer as a stent coating for enhanced capture of endothelial preogenitor cells. Biointerphase, 8(23):1-18.
Tan, J. et al., “In Vivo Biostability Study of a New Lead Insulation Material,” Cardiostim 2006, Europace Supplements, 8, 179PW/9 (2006).
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380042582.3, entitled “High Strength Polyisobutylene Polyurethanes” dated Jul. 27, 2016 consisting of 5 pages.
Tonelli, C. et al., “New Fluoro-Modified Thermoplastic Polyurethanes” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 87, Issue 14 (2003) 2279-2294.
Tonelli, Claudio et al., “New Perfluoropolyether Soft Segment Containing Polyurethanes”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 57, pp. 1031-1042 (1995).
Virmani, R. et al. Circulation Feb. 17, 2004, 109(6) 701-5.
Viski, Peter, et al. “A Novel Procedure for the Cieavage of Olefin Derivatives to Aldehydes Using Potassium Permanganate.”J. Org. Chem., 51:3213-3214, 1986.
Wang, F. Polydimethylsiloxane Modification of Segmented Thermoplastic Polyurethanes and Polyureas, PhD. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State university, Apr. 13, 1998.
Weisberg, David M. et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Amphiphilic Poly(urethaneurea)-comb-polyisobutylene Copolymers”, Macromolecules 2000, 33(12), pp. 4380-4389.
Weiss, H. G.; et al. “Diborane from the Sodium Borohydride-Sulfuric Acid Reaction.” Contribution From Research Laboratory, Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation, Dec. 5, 1959, 81(23):6167-6168.
Weissmuller, M. et al., “Preparation and end-linking of hydroxyl-terminated polystyrene star macromolecules”, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 200(3), 1999, 541-551.
Wiggins, Michael J. et al., “Effect of soft-segment chemistry on polyurethane biostability during in vitro fatigue loading”, Journal of biomedical materials research, 68(4), 2004, 668-683.
Wohlfarth, C., “Permittivity (Dielectric Constant) of Liquids”, CRC Handbook, 91st ed. 2010-2011, p. 6-186 to 6-207.
Wright, James I., “Using Polyurethanes in Medical Applications”, 5 pages. Downloaded from http://www.cmdm.com on Oct. 17, 2006.
Wu et al. “The role of adsorbed fibrinogen in platelet adhesion to polyurethane surfaces: A comparison of surface hydrophobicity, protein adsorption, monoclonal antibody binding, and platelet adhesion.” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, vol. 74A Issue 4, pp. 722-738 (2005).
Xu, Ruijian et al., “Low permeability biomedical polyurethane nanocomposites”, Journal of Miomedical Materials Research, 2003, vol. 64A, pp. 114-119.
Yang, M. et al., J. biomed. Mater. Res. 48 (1999) 13-23.
Yeh, J. et al., “Moisture diffusivity of Blamer.RTM. versus Biomer.RTM.-coated Polyisobutylene polyurethane urea (PIB-PUU): a potential blood sac material for the artificial heart”, Journal of Materials Science Letters 13(19), 1994, pp. 1390-1391.
Yoon, Sung C. et al., “Surface and bulk structure of segmented poly(ether urethanes) with Perfluoro Chain Extenders 5. Incorporation of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) and Polyisobutylene Macroglycols”, Macromolecules Mar. 14, 1994, 27(6), pp. 1548-1554.
York, P., “New Materials and Systems for Drug Delivery and Targeting”, Chemical Aspects of Drug Delivery Systems, Copyright 1996, pp. 1-10, proceedings from a symposium held Apr. 17-18, 1996 at Salford University.
Zhang, F., et. al. Glassy Carbon as an Absolute Intensity Calibration Standard for Small-Angle Scattering. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 41A:1151-1158, May 2010.
Zhang, W., and Muller, A. H.E. (2013). Architecture, self-assembly and properties of well-defined hybrid polymers based on polyhedral oligomeric silsequioxane (POSS). Progress in Polymer Science 38:1121-1162.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230018482 A1 Jan 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62618262 Jan 2018 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16248498 Jan 2019 US
Child 17951682 US