This invention relates to barrier devices for vehicular traffic control, soil erosion containment, impact attenuation and the like which can be interconnected with one another to define a barrier wall structure, and, more particularly, to an end connector for barrier devices which allows them to articulate relative to one another through an angle of about 22.5° in both the clockwise and counterclockwise directions when arranged in an interconnected line forming a barrier wall.
A variety of different devices have been developed for absorbing the kinetic energy resulting from impact with a moving vehicle, and for the containment of forces exerted by soil or water. Highway barriers and channelizers, for example, are intended to provide a continuous wall or barrier along the center line or shoulder of a highway when laid end-to-end to absorb grazing blows from moving vehicles. One commonly used highway barrier is formed of pre-cast reinforced concrete, and is known as the “Jersey” style barrier. Highway barriers of this type have a relatively wide base resting on the pavement or shoulder of the highway, opposed side walls and opposed end walls. The side walls consist of a “curb reveal” extending vertically upwardly from the base a short distance, a vertically extending top portion connected to the top wall of the barrier and an angled portion between the curb reveal and the vertical top portion. This design is intended to contact and redirect the wheels of a vehicle in a direction toward the lane of traffic in which the vehicle was originally traveling, instead of the lane of opposing traffic. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,059,362.
One problem with the Jersey-style highway barriers described above is the weight of reinforced concrete. A concrete barrier having a typical length of twelve feet weighs about 2,800-3,200 pounds, and requires special equipment to load, unload and handle on site. It has been estimated that for some road repairs, up to 40 percent of the total cost is expended on acquiring, delivering and handling concrete barriers. Additionally, concrete barriers have little or no ability to absorb shock upon impact, and have a high friction factor. This increases the damage to vehicles which collide with such barriers, and can lead to serious injuries to passengers of the vehicle.
In an effort to reduce weight, facilitate handling and shipment, and provide improved absorption of vehicle impact forces, highway barriers have been designed which are formed of a hollow plastic container filled with water, sand or other ballast material such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,681,302, 4,773,629, 4,946,306, 5,123,773 and 5,882,140. For example, the '302 patent discloses a barrier comprising a housing having a top wall, bottom wall, opposed side walls and opposed end walls interconnected to form a hollow interior which is filled with water. The ends of each barrier couple to an adjacent barrier to form a continuous wall. The container structure is preferably formed of a resilient, plastic material which is deformable upon impact and capable of resuming its original shape after being struck.
The '629, '306, '773 and '140 patents noted above represent advances in deformable highway barrier designs. The first two patents disclose barriers which comprise a longitudinally extending housing made of semi-rigid plastic which is self-supporting, and has a predetermined shape which is maintained when filled with water, sand or other ballast material. Such devices are connected end-to-end by a key insertable within grooves formed in the end walls of adjacent barriers. Interconnected fill openings are provided which permit adjacent barriers to be filled with water or other ballast material when laid end-to-end.
The '773 and '140 patents disclose further improvements in barrier devices including side walls formed with higher curb reveals, a horizontally extending step and vertical indentations in order to assist in maintaining the structural integrity of the container, and internal baffles for dampening movement of water or other ballast material within the container interior. Interlocking male and female coupling elements are formed on the opposite end walls of each barrier to facilitate connection of adjacent barriers end-to-end. Additionally, channels or openings are formed in the barriers from one side wall to the other to permit the insertion of the tines of a fork lift truck therein for easy loading, unloading and handling of the barriers.
One problem with barrier devices of the type described above is that the coupling elements which connect one barrier device to an adjacent one permit limited pivotal movement. While a gradual curve along a barrier wall formed by a number of interconnected barrier devices may be obtained, the amount of articulation between adjacent barriers is limited to a few degrees. Consequently, such barrier devices may not be used on roadways or other applications with sharper curves.
This invention is directed to an end connector for a barrier or channelizer device which permits articulation of one barrier device through a relatively large angle with respect to an adjacent barrier device within a barrier wall, so that a barrier wall may be formed having a significantly curved shape.
The barrier device of this invention comprises a housing having a top wall, a bottom wall, opposed end walls and opposed side walls interconnected to form a hollow interior adapted to be at least partially filled with a ballast material. In the presently preferred embodiment, the end connector of each barrier device includes a first coupling element on one end wall and a second coupling element on the opposite end wall, both of which extend from the top wall of the barrier device to its bottom wall. The first coupling element has a generally cylindrical-shaped inner cavity, defined by a curved surface on the end wall, a portion of which is open. An arm extends from opposite sides of the opening in the inner cavity. Each arm forms a stop along its inner surface, and a convex pivot surface along its outer surface. The two stops are spaced approximately 45° from one another.
The second coupling element on the opposite end wall of each barrier device includes a neck section protruding outwardly from a concave pivot surface formed on such opposite end wall between the top and bottom walls of the barrier device. The neck section is connected to a cylindrical-shaped pivot pin. In forming a barrier wall with the barrier devices of this invention, the pivot pin of the second coupling element of one barrier device is inserted into the inner cavity of the first coupling element of an adjacent barrier. The pivot pin is captured within the inner cavity, and the neck portion of the second coupling element extends between the two arms of the first coupling element. Because the two arms of the first coupling element are spaced about 45° apart, the barrier with the second coupling element can pivot throughout essentially the same 45° angle relative to the adjacent barrier, e.g. approximately 22.5° in both the clockwise and counterclockwise direction. This permits a barrier wall to be formed having a substantial curve, compared to that permitted in prior barrier device designs, allowing the barrier devices herein to be used on most curved roadways and similar applications.
The structure, operation and advantages of the presently preferred embodiment of this invention will become further apparent upon consideration of the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the Figs., the barrier device 10 of this invention comprises a top wall 12, a bottom wall 14, opposed end walls 16, 18, and, opposed side walls 20, 22 which are interconnected to collectively define a hollow interior. A number of barrier devices 10 may be arranged end-to-end to form an essentially continuous wall. Two barrier devices 10, 10′ are shown in
In the presently preferred embodiment, each of the walls 12-22 are formed of a semi-rigid plastic material chosen from the group consisting of low density polyethylene, acrylonitrile or butadiene styrene, high impact styrene, polycarbonates and the like. These plastic materials are all inherently tough and exhibit good energy absorption characteristics. They will also deform and elongate, but will not fail in a brittle manner at energy inputs which cause other materials to undergo brittle failure. The surfaces of these types of plastic materials are inherently smoother than materials from which other barriers are typically constructed, therefore creating less friction and reducing the likelihood of serious abrasion injuries to vehicles and/or passengers who may come into contact therewith. Additionally, materials of this type are unaffected by weather and have excellent basic resistance to weathering, leaching and biodegradation. Additives such as ultraviolet inhibitors can be combined with such plastic materials making them further resistant to the effects of weather. They also retain their mechanical and chemical properties at low ambient temperatures.
When using the barrier device 10 of this invention as a highway barrier, the hollow interior is preferably filled with a “ballast” material such as water or other liquid, or a flowable solid material such as sand, concrete and the like. For this purpose, the walls 12-22 of barrier device 10 have a thickness in the range of about one-eighth inch to one inch so as to perform satisfactorily in service. The barrier device 10 is preferably in the range of about six to eight feet in length, and, at the wall thickness noted above, has a weight when empty of about 20 to 140 lbs. When filled with a liquid such as water, the overall weight of the barrier is in the range of about 150 to 2,200 lbs. Flowable solid material such as sand and the like increase the weight of barrier 10 further.
The side walls 20 and 22 each include a substantially vertically oriented curb reveal 26 located between the bottom wall 14 and a horizontally extending ledge or step 28. Extending upwardly at an acute angle from the step 28 is an intermediate section 30 which terminates at the top wall 12. The top wall 12 of barrier 10 is formed with a pair of fill holes 32, preferably having a diameter in the range of about 3-4 inches, through which ballast material may be poured into the hollow interior of the barrier 10. In the presently preferred embodiment, a number of stabilizers 34 are integrally formed in the intermediate section 30, at regularly spaced intervals between the end walls 16, 18. Openings 36 extend through the barrier device 10, between the side walls 20 and 22, which are sized to receive the tines of a fork lift truck in order to move the barrier device 10 from place to place. A stabilizing plate 38 may be connected to the curb reveal 26 of each side wall 20 and 22 to enhance the lateral stability of the barrier device 10. The plates 38 may be formed with one or more holes 40 through which stakes or bolts (not shown) may be inserted and driven into the ground, highway or other surface to provide additional stability.
In the presently preferred embodiment, the end wall 16 is formed with a first coupling element 42 and the end wall 18 is formed with a second coupling element 44 which permit articulation of one barrier device 10 relative to a second barrier device 10′ as discussed below. The first and second coupling elements 42 and 44 extend from the top wall 12 to the bottom wall 14 of the barrier device 10. The first coupling element 42 comprises an inner cavity 46 defined by an arcuate surface of the end wall 16 having the general shape of a portion of a cylinder. The inner cavity 46 is formed with an outwardly facing opening 48 which is bounded on one side by a first arm 50 and on the opposite side by a second arm 52. The first arm 50 includes an angled inner surface forming a stop 54, and an outer portion defining a convex pivot surface 56. The second arm 52 has the same construction, with a stop 58 and convex pivot surface 60. As best seen in
The second coupling element 44 formed on the end wall 18 comprises a concave surface 64 extending from the top wall 12 to the bottom wall 14 of the barrier device 10, and between its side walls 20 and 22. A thin, generally rectangular-shaped neck section 66 protrudes outwardly from the concave surface 64, along its entire length. The neck section 66 is connected to a generally cylindrical-shaped pivot pin 68.
Referring now to
As depicted in
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3326099 | Cova et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3606258 | Fitch | Sep 1971 | A |
3698290 | Wallace | Oct 1972 | A |
3704861 | Glaesener | Dec 1972 | A |
3784167 | Glaesener | Jan 1974 | A |
3856268 | Fitch | Dec 1974 | A |
3876185 | Welch | Apr 1975 | A |
3880404 | Fitch | Apr 1975 | A |
3967704 | Ogden | Jul 1976 | A |
4007917 | Brubaker | Feb 1977 | A |
4059362 | Smith | Nov 1977 | A |
4307973 | Glaesener | Dec 1981 | A |
4321989 | Meinzer | Mar 1982 | A |
4391077 | Giess | Jul 1983 | A |
4415680 | Ushirokawa et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4681302 | Thompson | Jul 1987 | A |
4773629 | Yodock et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4775854 | Cottrell | Oct 1988 | A |
4869619 | Akesaka | Sep 1989 | A |
4917219 | Henry | Apr 1990 | A |
4946306 | Yodock et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4982535 | Pickett | Jan 1991 | A |
5002423 | Mileti | Mar 1991 | A |
5011325 | Antonioli | Apr 1991 | A |
5046884 | Girotti | Sep 1991 | A |
5052850 | Bishop | Oct 1991 | A |
5104254 | Durand | Apr 1992 | A |
5123773 | Yodock et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5429448 | Ballesteros | Jul 1995 | A |
5498101 | Braverman | Mar 1996 | A |
5531540 | Wasserstrom et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5605413 | Brown | Feb 1997 | A |
5607252 | Tischer | Mar 1997 | A |
5688071 | Owen | Nov 1997 | A |
5882140 | Yodock et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5988934 | Wasserstrom | Nov 1999 | A |
6082926 | Zimmer | Jul 2000 | A |
6152064 | Morton | Nov 2000 | A |
6179516 | Ivey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6221928 | Kozma et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6666616 | Yodock, III et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
20020025221 | Johnson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
631 582 | Nov 1989 | FR |
2 292 404 | Feb 1996 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080286041 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |